DOCSLIB.ORG

Managing Large-Scale Penetration of Intermittent Renewables

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Managing Large-Scale Penetration of Intermittent Renewables The MIT Energy Initiative MITEI is also a resource for policy makers and the public, providing unbiased analysis and serving MITEI pairs the Institute’s world-class research as an honest broker for industry and government. teams with key players across the innovation MITEI’s educational offerings combine single-discipline Managing Large-Scale spectrum to help accomplish two important depth with multidiscipline breadth, making our goals: improving today’s energy systems campus an energy learning laboratory. Through Penetration of Intermittent and transforming tomorrow’s global energy research, analysis, and education, MITEI is working marketplace. to find answers to reinvent our energy world. Renewables Linking science, innovation, and policy to transform the world’s energy systems Energy Initiative Massachusetts Institute of Technology An MIT Energy Initiative Mailing address Symposium 77 Massachusetts Avenue, E19-307 Cambridge, MA 02139 USA April 20, 2011 Visiting address 400 Main Street, E19-307 (3rd Floor) Cambridge, MA 02142 USA 617.258.8891 web.mit.edu/mitei MIT Energy Initiative Symposium on Managing Large-Scale Penetration of Intermittent Renewables | April 20, 2011 C Export pages Managing Large-Scale Penetration of Intermittent 1-55 only!!!!!! Renewables An MIT Energy Initiative Symposium April 20, 2011 A B O U T T H E R E P O R T Summary for Policy Makers On April 20, 2011, the MIT Energy Initiative (MITEI) sponsored a symposium on Managing Large-Scale Penetration of Intermittent Renewables that brought together experts in electricity generation, transmission system management, and regulation to discuss the impacts of large- scale penetration of intermittent renewables on electrical power systems. Intermittency refers to the limited control of electrical output from variable and partially predictable generating technol- ogies, such as wind and solar. The grid can accommodate small amounts of intermittent electricity generation, but large-scale penetration requires rebalancing the different elements of the elec- tricity system: generation, transmission, storage, demand management, and regulation. The symposium focused on three different aspects of intermittency: (1) prospects for more flexible operation of thermal power plants — coal, nuclear, and natural gas-fired — to compensate for intermittent sources through cycling and ramping, and the economic significance of this added flexibility; (2) impact of intermittent generation on the transmission grid and system operation; and (3) intermittent renewable generation policies and regulation. The symposium did not address the question as to the desired level of wind and solar, just the issues of managing their large-scale deployment. Prepared and contributed papers informed panel discussions; these documents are available at www.mit.edu/mitei. Symposium participants came from different backgrounds and expressed a wide range of views. Here we summarize for policy makers the key points from the lively discussions. The summary reflects our observations, and it is not offered as a consensus view of the symposium participants. s Framing the issue. Twenty-nine states, the European Union (EU), and countries around the world have adopted policies and incentives to encourage deployment of low-emission renew- able elec tricity generating technologies. This has led to a rapid increase in wind and solar generation, both of which are intermittent non-dispatchable electricity sources. While their deployment remains small today in aggregate, some regions of the US and some countries have sub stantial amounts of wind power. This operational experience informs the challenges facing technology, policy, and regulation in managing widespread large-scale deployment. The characteristics of intermittent sources require system operators to adopt different, and more costly, measures to balance load and generation and maintain system reliability. Intermittency also will influence planning and design of future systems, electricity markets, and regulation. The technical and policy issues will not be resolved quickly because new arrangements will involve winners and losers compared to conventional grid operations. 1. Flexible operation of thermal power plants. In 2010, thermal generation plants — coal, natural gas, and nuclear — provided 88% of US electricity generation. In the absence of pervasive utility-scale and economic storage systems, these units will be required to provide flexibility in a power system where large-scale penetration of intermittent renew- ables is mandated in the absence of large-scale storage. Providing generation flexibility entails fast ramping times, short startup times, and efficient partial load operation. Coal plants and current nuclear plants were not designed specifically for this flexible operation, but were instead intended to provide steady baseload generation. Natural gas plants, on the other hand, have been built, in part, with flexibility in mind in order to respond to the daily variations in load. However, the economics of baseload plants are affected signifi- cantly if they are called upon to operate in load-following mode. This is most clear for nuclear power. The very high capital costs require very high capacity factors for cost recovery. 2 MIT Energy Initiative Symposium on Managing Large-Scale Penetration of Intermittent Renewables | April 20, 2011 Expanding the ability of coal, natural gas, and nuclear plants physically to ramp and cycle to varying degrees will negatively impact their operations, maintenance schedules, and expected operational lifetimes. Retrofits, advanced control systems, and newer plant designs can improve flexible operations and provide better monitoring of physical wear, but these upgrades are technically demanding and costly. In addition, when thermal generation plants are operated at partial load, fuel efficiencies will decrease, emissions will increase, and total system costs will be raised, thus diminishing the benefits of renew- able generation. Accordingly, it will be crucial to assess continuously the balance between the benefits of greater renewable penetration with the cost of adapting conventional baseload systems to meet new operating requirements. Increased flexibility of baseload generation will require new regulatory practices to allocate the recovery of the additional capital cost incurred by more flexible thermal generation capability among intermittent generation units, to adapt economic dispatch rules that take into account the differences in variable cost, and to offer incentives and compensate for sufficient capacity for balancing supply and demand in the face of uncertainty in both. The costs to thermal plant operators of dealing with increased ramping and cycling requirements at different timescales remain to be understood in detail. Today, the optimal dispatch of thermal and intermittent sources cannot be implemented. The underlying point is that increased cycling of thermal power plants because of large-scale deployment of intermittent sources will require incorporation of both spatial and temporal consider- ations that have not been employed in economic dispatch algorithms. 2. Managing intermittent generation on system operations. Transmission, distribution, and storage technology improvements can aid the integration of intermittent renewables. These improvements include geographic aggregation, which smoothes the variability of the intermittency of wind and solar energy over large distances; increasing network intercon- nections to facilitate balancing through electricity imports and exports; and utilization of advanced sensors, control systems, and dispatch algorithms that can monitor and respond to power system changes in real time. Progress is slow because of inadequate mechanisms for exchanging data and setting interface standards, and because system operators under- standably tend to be risk-averse and place a higher premium on reliability than on innova- tion. Improved analytical and modeling tools are needed to optimize operation and regulation of the transmission and distribution system with significant deployment of intermittent generation. 3. Intermittent renewable generation policies and regulation. Policies have been adopted around the world to promote deployment of renewable generation. These policies have been successful in increasing the capacity of wind and solar generation in various national systems, but the cost and operating implications of these policies are not fully appreciated. It is clear that policies that regulate investment, operations, and rates will undergo significant change. It is becoming clear that the total costs and consequences of these policies were not fully understood. In order to ensure the goals of reliability and economic efficiency while simultaneously lowering carbon emissions, substantial regulatory changes are needed. This is further complicated by the location of renewable resources, which is often remote from major load centers, which means transmission may cross multiple jurisdictions, greatly complicating siting options and opportunities. MIT Energy Initiative Symposium on Managing Large-Scale Penetration of Intermittent Renewables | April 20, 2011 3 In the US, power sector regulation is complex and involves three distinct levels of regulation with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and the North American Electricity Reliability Corporation (NERC) at the federal level, a range of Regional Transmission Operators (RTO) and Independent System Operators (ISO) at the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Economics of the Green Investment Bank: Costs and Benefits, Rationale and Value for Money
    The economics of the Green Investment Bank: costs and benefits, rationale and value for money Report prepared for The Department for Business, Innovation & Skills Final report October 2011 The economics of the Green Investment Bank: cost and benefits, rationale and value for money 2 Acknowledgements This report was commissioned by the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS). Vivid Economics would like to thank BIS staff for their practical support in the review of outputs throughout this project. We would like to thank McKinsey and Deloitte for their valuable assistance in delivering this project from start to finish. In addition, we would like to thank the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC), the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), the Committee on Climate Change (CCC), the Carbon Trust and Sustainable Development Capital LLP (SDCL), for their valuable support and advice at various stages of the research. We are grateful to the many individuals in the financial sector and the energy, waste, water, transport and environmental industries for sharing their insights with us. The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors and not those of BIS or any other party, and the authors take responsibility for any errors or omissions. An appropriate citation for this report is: Vivid Economics in association with McKinsey & Co, The economics of the Green Investment Bank: costs and benefits, rationale and value for money, report prepared for The Department for Business, Innovation & Skills, October 2011 The economics of the Green Investment Bank: cost and benefits, rationale and value for money 3 Executive Summary The UK Government is committed to achieving the transition to a green economy and delivering long-term sustainable growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Advantages of Applying Large-Scale Energy Storage for Load-Generation Balancing
    energies Article Advantages of Applying Large-Scale Energy Storage for Load-Generation Balancing Dawid Chudy * and Adam Le´sniak Institute of Electrical Power Engineering, Lodz University of Technology, Stefanowskiego Str. 18/22, PL 90-924 Lodz, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The continuous development of energy storage (ES) technologies and their wider utiliza- tion in modern power systems are becoming more and more visible. ES is used for a variety of applications ranging from price arbitrage, voltage and frequency regulation, reserves provision, black-starting and renewable energy sources (RESs), supporting load-generation balancing. The cost of ES technologies remains high; nevertheless, future decreases are expected. As the most profitable and technically effective solutions are continuously sought, this article presents the results of the analyses which through the created unit commitment and dispatch optimization model examines the use of ES as support for load-generation balancing. The performed simulations based on various scenarios show a possibility to reduce the number of starting-up centrally dispatched generating units (CDGUs) required to satisfy the electricity demand, which results in the facilitation of load-generation balancing for transmission system operators (TSOs). The barriers that should be encountered to improving the proposed use of ES were also identified. The presented solution may be suitable for further development of renewables and, in light of strict climate and energy policies, may lead to lower utilization of large-scale power generating units required to maintain proper operation of power systems. Citation: Chudy, D.; Le´sniak,A. Keywords: load-generation balancing; large-scale energy storage; power system services modeling; Advantages of Applying Large-Scale power system operation; power system optimization Energy Storage for Load-Generation Balancing.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioenergy's Role in Balancing the Electricity Grid and Providing Storage Options – an EU Perspective
    Bioenergy's role in balancing the electricity grid and providing storage options – an EU perspective Front cover information panel IEA Bioenergy: Task 41P6: 2017: 01 Bioenergy's role in balancing the electricity grid and providing storage options – an EU perspective Antti Arasto, David Chiaramonti, Juha Kiviluoma, Eric van den Heuvel, Lars Waldheim, Kyriakos Maniatis, Kai Sipilä Copyright © 2017 IEA Bioenergy. All rights Reserved Published by IEA Bioenergy IEA Bioenergy, also known as the Technology Collaboration Programme (TCP) for a Programme of Research, Development and Demonstration on Bioenergy, functions within a Framework created by the International Energy Agency (IEA). Views, findings and publications of IEA Bioenergy do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the IEA Secretariat or of its individual Member countries. Foreword The global energy supply system is currently in transition from one that relies on polluting and depleting inputs to a system that relies on non-polluting and non-depleting inputs that are dominantly abundant and intermittent. Optimising the stability and cost-effectiveness of such a future system requires seamless integration and control of various energy inputs. The role of energy supply management is therefore expected to increase in the future to ensure that customers will continue to receive the desired quality of energy at the required time. The COP21 Paris Agreement gives momentum to renewables. The IPCC has reported that with current GHG emissions it will take 5 years before the carbon budget is used for +1,5C and 20 years for +2C. The IEA has recently published the Medium- Term Renewable Energy Market Report 2016, launched on 25.10.2016 in Singapore.
    [Show full text]
  • Uranium Isanaturallyoccurring,Verydense,Metallic Definition Andcharacteristics Deposits Definition, Mineralogyand Proportion Ofu-235Tobetween 3And5percent
    Uranium March 2010 Definition, mineralogy and Symbol U nt deposits Atomic number 92 opme vel Definition and characteristics Atomic weight 238.03 de l Uranium is a naturally occurring, very dense, metallic 3 ra Density at 298 K 19 050 kg/m UK element with an average abundance in the Earth’s crust ne mi of about 3 ppm (parts per million). It forms large, highly Melting point 1132 °C e bl charged ions and does not easily fit into the crystal struc- Boiling point 3927 °C na ai ture of common silicate minerals such as feldspar or mica. st Accordingly, as an incompatible element, it is amongst the Mineral Hardness 6 Moh’s scale su r last elements to crystallise from cooling magmas and one -8 f o Electrical resistivity 28 x 10 Ohm m re of the first to enter the liquid on melting. nt Table 1 Selected properties of uranium. Ce Minerals Under oxidizing conditions uranium exists in a highly soluble form, U6+ (an ion with a positive charge of 6), and is therefore very mobile. However, under reducing conditions Other physical properties are summarised in Table 1. it converts to an insoluble form, U4+, and is precipitated. It is these characteristics that often result in concentrations Mineralogy of uranium that are sufficient for economic extraction. Uranium is known to occur in over 200 different minerals, but most of these do not occur in deposits of sufficient Uranium is naturally radioactive. It spontaneously decays grade to warrant economic extraction. The most common through a long series of alpha and beta particle emissions, uranium-bearing minerals found in workable deposits are ultimately forming the stable element lead.
    [Show full text]
  • Movement of Radioactive Material Sellafield Site
    Proceedings of the 18th International Symposium on the Packaging and Transportation of Radioactive Materials PATRAM 2016 September 18-23, 2016, Kobe, Japan Paper No. 3034 Movement of Radioactive Material Sellafield Site Maz Hussain Sellafield Ltd., United Kingdom. Abstract Background The UK nuclear decommissioning priority is to reduce risk and hazard and to deliver the clean-up mission cost effectively. This is particularly relevant at Sellafield where the Legacy Ponds and Silos pose the most significant challenges. The availability of safe packaging for the movement and storage on the Sellafield site is a key enabler to meet the NDA mission for safe interim storage ahead of its subsequent treatment, packaging and final storage to a Geologic Disposal Facility (GDF). There are a significant number of packages and package design types operating on the Sellafield site. Some packages are licensed to the IAEA regulations for safe transport and others comply only with the Sellafield site specific requirements. Introduction Packages to and from the Sellafield site need to comply with the IAEA regulations for safe transport and must meet the Sellafield site requirements. However, the IAEA regulations do not apply to packages within a licensed site. For on-site safe package operations compliance is required against Sellafield site specific procedures, standards and guidance. Package Management System There are a significant number and types of package transfers routinely undertaken safely on the Sellafield site. The packages range from small (18Kg) hand held sample castles to large complex (100Te) packages some with in-built gamma gates, mechanical interlocks and hoisting drive mechanisms. The Sellafield Package Management System (SPMS) efficiently manages package operations and includes for asset register, package tracking, operational history and maintenance.
    [Show full text]
  • Removing Barriers for Deployment Through Policy Development; the UK Case Study
    3rd International Conference on Ocean Energy, 6 October, Bilbao Removing barriers for deployment through policy development; the UK case study. 1 O H. Wragg 1 RenewableUK, Greencoat House, Victoria, London, UK E-mail: [email protected] Abstract and carbon emission reduction. In the UK this came firstly from the European Renewable Energy Systems This paper will provide an overview of the directive [1] and secondly through the UK Climate current state of the UK marine energy industry, Change Act [2]. covering installed capacity to date, planed projects The two further key pieces of UK primary and development scenarios up to 2020. Reference legislation that have subsequently be established are the will be made to the development of RenewableUK’s Renewables Obligation [3], which provides the UK’s renewable Energy Database. revenue support mechanisms for renewable energy, and This paper will also outline the major the Marine and Costal Access Bill [4], which will recommendations form RenewableUK’s response to develop a clearly defined system for planning and the UK Marine Energy Action Plan and how this licensing commercial activities within the UK’s could facilitate development. Particular attention renewable energy zone[5]. will be made to: The UK Government has also produced several key • How the secondary legislation arising from the documents within the past year. In 2009 the Marine and Coastal Access Bill will impact the Department of Energy and Climate Change published industry. the Renewable Energy Strategy [6] and the Department • The current status of the UK funding landscape for Business Innovation and Skills launched the Low and possible development pathways.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geopolitics of the Global Energy Transition Lecture Notes in Energy
    Lecture Notes in Energy 73 Manfred Hafner Simone Tagliapietra Editors The Geopolitics of the Global Energy Transition Lecture Notes in Energy Volume 73 Lecture Notes in Energy (LNE) is a series that reports on new developments in the study of energy: from science and engineering to the analysis of energy policy. The series’ scope includes but is not limited to, renewable and green energy, nuclear, fossil fuels and carbon capture, energy systems, energy storage and harvesting, batteries and fuel cells, power systems, energy efficiency, energy in buildings, energy policy, as well as energy-related topics in economics, management and transportation. Books published in LNE are original and timely and bridge between advanced textbooks and the forefront of research. Readers of LNE include postgraduate students and non-specialist researchers wishing to gain an accessible introduction to a field of research as well as professionals and researchers with a need for an up-to-date reference book on a well-defined topic. The series publishes single- and multi-authored volumes as well as advanced textbooks. **Indexed in Scopus and EI Compendex** The Springer Energy board welcomes your book proposal. Please get in touch with the series via Anthony Doyle, Executive Editor, Springer ([email protected]) More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/8874 Manfred Hafner • Simone Tagliapietra Editors The Geopolitics of the Global Energy Transition Editors Manfred Hafner Simone Tagliapietra Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei Milan, Italy Milan, Italy ISSN 2195-1284 ISSN 2195-1292 (electronic) Lecture Notes in Energy ISBN 978-3-030-39065-5 ISBN 978-3-030-39066-2 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39066-2 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Onr Corporate Plan 2017/18 En Route to 2020
    ONR CORPORATE PLAN 2017/18 EN ROUTE TO 2020 Office for Nuclear Regulation Corporate Plan 2017/18 Financial year 1 April 2017 to 31 March 2018 Presented to Parliament pursuant to Paragraphs 23 and 25(3) of Schedule 7 to the Energy Act 2013 July 2017 © ONR copyright 2017 The text of this document (this excludes, where present, the Royal Arms and all departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium provided that it is reproduced accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as ONR copyright and the document title specified. Where third party material has been identified, permission from the respective copyright holder must be sought. Any enquiries related to this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] This publication is available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications Print ISBN 9781474145695 Web ISBN 9781474145701 ID P002881793 06/17 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK for Williams Lea Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office CONTENTS 1. Foreword .........................................................................................................1 2. About this plan ..............................................................................................3 3. Our Operating Environment .........................................................................9 4. Our Strategic Themes and Key Activities ....................................................15 Influencing improvements
    [Show full text]
  • Hydroelectric Power -- What Is It? It=S a Form of Energy … a Renewable Resource
    INTRODUCTION Hydroelectric Power -- what is it? It=s a form of energy … a renewable resource. Hydropower provides about 96 percent of the renewable energy in the United States. Other renewable resources include geothermal, wave power, tidal power, wind power, and solar power. Hydroelectric powerplants do not use up resources to create electricity nor do they pollute the air, land, or water, as other powerplants may. Hydroelectric power has played an important part in the development of this Nation's electric power industry. Both small and large hydroelectric power developments were instrumental in the early expansion of the electric power industry. Hydroelectric power comes from flowing water … winter and spring runoff from mountain streams and clear lakes. Water, when it is falling by the force of gravity, can be used to turn turbines and generators that produce electricity. Hydroelectric power is important to our Nation. Growing populations and modern technologies require vast amounts of electricity for creating, building, and expanding. In the 1920's, hydroelectric plants supplied as much as 40 percent of the electric energy produced. Although the amount of energy produced by this means has steadily increased, the amount produced by other types of powerplants has increased at a faster rate and hydroelectric power presently supplies about 10 percent of the electrical generating capacity of the United States. Hydropower is an essential contributor in the national power grid because of its ability to respond quickly to rapidly varying loads or system disturbances, which base load plants with steam systems powered by combustion or nuclear processes cannot accommodate. Reclamation=s 58 powerplants throughout the Western United States produce an average of 42 billion kWh (kilowatt-hours) per year, enough to meet the residential needs of more than 14 million people.
    [Show full text]
  • The Value of Economic Dispatch a Report to Congress Pursuant To
    THE VALUE OF ECONOMIC DISPATCH A REPORT TO CONGRESS PURSUANT TO SECTION 1234 OF THE ENERGY POLICY ACT OF 2005 Prepared by United States Department of Energy November 7, 2005 ii THE VALUE OF ECONOMIC DISPATCH A REPORT TO CONGRESS PURSUANT TO SECTION 1234 OF THE ENERGY POLICY ACT OF 2005 Prepared by United States Department of Energy November 7, 2005 iii iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents i List of Acronyms iii Section 1 -- Introduction and Summary 1 Industry Changes 1 Study Method and Overview 2 Summary of Findings 3 Section 2 -- Economic Dispatch 9 What is Economic Dispatch? 9 “Economic” Dispatch vs. “Efficient” Dispatch 11 Security-Constrained Unit Commitment 12 Grid Conditions that Constrain Economic Dispatch 13 Resource Considerations that Constrain Economic Dispatch 14 Security-Constrained Economic Dispatch 15 Current Practices in Building the Economic Dispatch Resource Stack 16 Figure 1 – Building the Economic Dispatch Stack 17 What’s Left for Economic Merit Order Dispatch? 19 Current Practices for Optimizing Dispatch 20 Variations in Economic Dispatch Practices 22 Figure 2 – Map of ISOs and RTOs 26 How Large Should a Dispatch Area Be? 27 Economic Dispatch and Reliability 29 Section 3 – The Benefits of Economic Dispatch 31 Congressional Intent and Study Definitions 31 Overview of Prior Studies and Other Materials Reviewed 32 Review of RTO Studies 33 Review of IPP Studies 34 Findings from Review of Prior Studies and Submitted Materials 36 Table 1 – Studies and Documents Reviewed to Assess Benefits of Economic Dispatch 38 Table 2 – Summary of Economic Dispatch Benefits from RTO Studies 40 Table 3 – Summary of Economic Dispatch Benefits from IPP Studies 42 Section 4 – Which Resources Get Into the Economic Dispatch Stack? 43 Conditions That Could Exclude a Resource from the Dispatch Stack 45 i v Section 5 – Proposed Modifications to Economic Dispatch and Suggestions for Future Work 49 Proposals for Modifying Economic Dispatch 49 Recommendations for Future Work 51 References 54 Appendix A – U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • October 24, 2011 Volume 25 Issue 43
    October 24, 2011 Volume 25 Issue 43 A weekly publication of ® Ux Consulting www.uxc.com The Leading Source For Timely Market Information Ux U3O8 Price: (10/24/11) $51.75 (-$1.00) Third Quarter Spot Uranium Ux LT U3O8 Price: (9/26/11) Review $64.00 The third quarter of 2011 was gener- middle of the month before settling down Ux Weekly Uranium Spot Prices ally a calm one that witnessed some at $52.50 by the end of the month. US$/lb U3O8 © UxC price volatility and a moderate but con- Although the spot price was volatile $75 sistent stream of spot volume, as the during the quarter, the price ended only $70 number of transactions increased con- $0.25 lower than where it began during siderably but at lower average volumes. the first week of the quarter. $65 Classic supply/demand market funda- Buying Activity – As discussed be- $60 mentals were displayed on a small scale low, utility buying declined somewhat, $55 during the quarter, as demand declined but overall activity was notably higher during those times that price increased, $50 than that posted during the second quar- but increased when price fell. The spot $45 ter. This is interesting given that on price fell to its lowest level for the year at repeated occasions a number of partici- $40 the end of August before rebounding pants discussed views that activity was $35 slightly by the end of the quarter. Below or appeared to be slowing considerably. 09 10 11 is a brief review of some of the other Over the past quarter, there were a highlights from last quarter.
    [Show full text]
  • ON20-PRJ-AG Distribution List Main-V1
    Open Networks Project Advisory Group Members Representing Name Company Email Frank Gordon REA [email protected] Rep TBC Xero Energy / ITP Energised [email protected] Renewables Yonna Vitanova Renewable UK [email protected] Barnaby Wharton Renewable UK [email protected] Michael Reiley Scottish Renewables IDNOs Vicki Spiers Independent Networks Association [email protected] Data Anthony Bivens Electralink [email protected] Domestic Users Caroline Farquhar Citizens Advice Bureau [email protected] Mark Hull Community Energy Scotland [email protected] Emma Bridge Community Energy England [email protected] Community Energy Felix Wight Repowering [email protected] Merlin Hyman Regen [email protected] Caroline Bragg Association for Decentralised Energy [email protected] Aggregators Rick Parfett Association for Decentralised Energy [email protected] Goran StrbaC Imperial College [email protected] Academia Ivana Kockar University of Strathclyde [email protected] Simon Gill Scottish Gov Energy Advisory Dept [email protected] Devolved governments Ron Loveland Energy Adviser to the Welsh Gov [email protected] Charles Wood Energy UK [email protected] Generators Simon Vicary Energy UK/EDF Energy [email protected] Helen Stack Centrica [email protected] Daniel Alchin Energy UK [email protected] Large Suppliers Graeme Dawson npower [email protected]
    [Show full text]