DOCSLIB.ORG

Planning Regulatory Committee

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Planning Regulatory Committee Planning Regulatory Committee Minutes of the Meeting Held on 8 July 2011 Present: Mr J Rogers - Chairman Mr B Bremner Mr D Harrison Mr D Callaby Mr J Rogers Mr N Dixon Mr J Shrimplin – Vice-Chairman Mr P Duigan Ms H Thomson Mr A Gunson Mr M Wilby Mr R Hanton Mr A Wright Mr P Hardy Members also in attendance: Mr J Herbert Mr I Monson Officers in Attendance: Mr D Collinson - Environment, Transport and Development Ms F Croxen - Legal Services Mr A Harriss - Environment, Transport and Development Mr D Higgins - Environment, Transport and Development Mr N Johnson - Environment, Transport and Development Ms A Lambert - Environment, Transport and Development Ms N Levett - Environment, Transport and Development Mr N Palmer - Environment, Transport and Development 1. Apologies and Substitution 1.1 Apologies for absence were received from Mr Hemsley, Mr Iles, Mr Plant and Mr Stone 2. Minutes 2.1 The minutes of the meeting held on 3 June 2011 were confirmed by the Committee and signed by the Chairman. 3. Declarations of Interest 3.1 The following declarations were made: Planning Regulatory Committee – 8 July 2011 1 Mr Bremner - Item 5a as the portfolio holder for Planning at Norwich City Council. Mr Rogers – Item 5c as a Member of Breckland District Council Mr Duigan – Item 5c as a Member of Breckland District Council Mr Hardy – Item 5a as the Local Member 4 Urgent Business 4.1 There were no items of urgent business. 5. Applications Referred to Committee for Determination 5.1 C/4/2010/4003: Norwich:Trowse Depot, Old Station Yard, Trowse Norwich:Non-Compliance with Conditions 2 and 3 of Planning Permission C/4/2007/4003 to enable the grant of a full planning permission for the continued use of the site for storage and distribution of aggregates and manufacture of coated roadstone at Trowse Depot with no defined end date: Lafarge Aggregates Ltd 5.2 The annexed report by the Director of Environment, Transport and Development was received. 5.3 It was stated that since the report had been circulated an objection had been received from a resident of Millgate. The officer had spoken to the resident and the objection was that there had not been a proper, comprehensive consultation and there were health risks from the site from dust and noise. There was also problems caused by the noise and vibrations of frequent freight trains shaking the nearby houses. 5.4 The following points were made in response to questions from the Committee: The suggested conditions place more stringent limits on future expansion. Britvic Soft Drinks did not object to the current permission granted on the site, it was only worried over any future expansion on the site. All the conditions put forward by Norwich City Council had been accepted by the County Council in the report. 5.5 Mr Atkinson from Lanpro spoke in objection to the application raising the following concerns: The impact that the application would have on dwellings in the area and development of affordable housing would be negative. Lafarge’s ability to operate the site and manage the long term generation process. The application was a permanent and high impact with 120 HGV movements per day. There had been no Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) carried out for this application and no proper assessment for economic growth. Planning Regulatory Committee – 8 July 2011 2 There was no scope for mitigation measures and no details of how Lafarge would manage off site impact. The site had changed radically since the temporary application was approved, the site was now in a residential area. The site was too small to accommodate the quantity of aggregate being extracted. The site would have the effect of capping the value and the sale of properties in the area. He summed up by saying that he requested the decision to be deferred until an Environmental Impact Assessment had been carried out along with a detailed scheme of mitigation for the application to take into account noise and dust pollution and overspill from the site. 5.6 In response to a question from the Committee Mr Atkinson said that concerns related to the extent of the impact from the site and he felt that it was inappropriate to delegate powers to officers with regard to mitigation levels at the site. He would ask for a detailed series of mitigation plans and how the impacts would be dealt with. 5.7 Mr Anderson, Senior Planning and Estates Manager at Lafarge Aggregates, made the following points: Lafarge Aggregates was a major employer in the area and throughout the UK and supplier to the construction industry. It had invested in rail transport and currently operated 50 trains per week. This all contributes towards sustainability targets and the carbon reduction strategy within the County. The railhead at Trowse had been moving bulk materials by rail and road for over 50 years. The application in 2008 resulting in the time limited consent allowed any issues needing solving to be addressed. The site was a highly sustainable facility and essential to the supply of aggregates and coated roadstone to Norwich and mid-Norfolk. The site supplied a local market which would have to be supplied from elsewhere if the application was not successful. This would mean materials would have to travel considerable distances by road which was not as environmentally friendly or sustainable. Technical reports had been commissioned by Lafarge regarding noise, dust and environmental issues and appropriate mitigation. The Planning Authority, Norwich City Council’s Environmental Health Officer, the Environment Agency (EA) and other statutory consultees had rigorously reviewed these reports. All concerns raised had been addressed by recommending strict conditions which would be included in any planning consent. The application was a continuation of existing resources and there was no proposals to intensify the use of the site. Planning Regulatory Committee – 8 July 2011 3 The site had operated for fifty years without any impact on neighbouring land users and the conditions proposed by NCC further strengthen an already tightly controlled site. Lafarge would be willing to set up a liaison group with Trowse Parish Council, neighbours and local councillors. 5.8 The following answers were given in response to questions by the Committee: Some modifications would be needed to be made to the plant. The company needed the long term future that a permanent permission would guarantee in order to justify investing such money in the plant. There were no plans to increase the range of operations at the site. This planning permission was submitted prior to the expiry of the temporary planning permission. There had been some spillage of materials through the perimeter fencing but this would be remedied by a solid retaining wall. The movement of HGVs fluctuated from week to week. Lafarge would not want to limit operations at the site they would be looking for an indefinite planning permission. Planting trees on the boundary of the site would not have an impact on suppressing noise but would help visual impact. 5.9 Local Member Mr Hardy made the following comments: The perceived impact on house prices would generate a lack of confidence to businesses and residents in the area. Could the application be deferred until an EIA had been carried out? He wanted companies such as Britvic and Lanpro to have the confidence to stay in the area. 5.10 It was confirmed that the planners had concluded that there was no need for an EIA to be carried out in this case. There was a comprehensive list of conditions placed on the application. 5.11 The recommendation was proposed by Mr Wilby and seconded by Mr Gunson. With nine votes for none against and four abstentions it was RESOLVED: 5.12 That the Director of Environment, Transport and Development be: (i) Authorised to grant planning permission subject to conditions outlined in Section 12 of the report. (ii)The delegation of powers be given to officers to discharge conditions where those detailed above require the submission and implementation of a scheme, or further details, either before development commences, or within a specified date of planning permission being granted or at any other period. (iii) The delegation of powers be given to officers to deal with any non-material amendments to the application that may be submitted. Planning Regulatory Committee – 8 July 2011 4 6. C/7/2010/7016: East Carelton and Ketteringham Parishes: Former Ketteringham Quarry, Hethersett Road, East Carelton: Continued recycling of former building materials and use of concrete batching plant until 31 May 2029: Site entrance improvements including hardening of site access road: Hardening of remainder of concrete batching compound: Highway improvements: Construction of car park and footpath: Erection of estate fencing around ice house: Restoration of the site in accordance with an improved restoration scheme by 31 May 2030 with public access to former quarry and adjoining land and woodland for informal recreational purposes: Mobile Concrete Supplies/Middleton Aggregates Ltd 6.1 The annexed report by the Director of Environment, Transport and Development was received. 6.2 The following points were made in response to questions from the Committee: The proposal did not necessitate the need to remove any of the oak trees from the two visibility splays. No comments had been received from Norfolk Wildlife Trust. 6.3 Mr Ponder spoke on behalf of the objectors in the village making the following points: The application was to make a temporary permission permanent. The site would be in the middle of a conservation area and a wildlife corridor to Wymondham. It was an oasis for bio-diversity and local residents would like to see it returned to natural parkland.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan
    Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan Regulation 18 HRA Report May 2021 Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan Regulation 18 HRA Report LC- 654 Document Control Box Client South Norfolk Council Habitats Regulations Assessment Report Title Regulation 18 – HRA Report Status FINAL Filename LC-654_South Norfolk_Regulation 18_HRA Report_8_140521SC.docx Date May 2021 Author SC Reviewed ND Approved ND Photo: Female broad bodied chaser by Shutterstock Regulation 18 – HRA Report May 2021 LC-654_South Norfolk_Regulation 18_HRA Report_8_140521SC.docx Contents 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose of this report ............................................................................................................................................... 1 2 The South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan ................................................................... 3 2.1 Greater Norwich Local Plan .................................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan ................................................................................ 3 2.3 Village Clusters ..........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • East Carleton Tg 17984 02053
    EAST CARLETON TG 17984 02053 WW1 - 8 WW2 - 0 With acknowledgement to the Commonwealth War Graves Commission http://www.cwgc.org/ Unmarked cross of sacrifice © Evelyn Simak WW1 Casualties Awards Rank Number Service Unit Age Parish Conflict Date Notes Gilbert Lance East BAILEY 8576 Norfolk Regt. 2nd Bn. 23 WW1 22/04/1916 Born in Swainsthorpe Hart Corporal Carleton Cecil East BECKETT Sapper 85087 Royal Engineers 207th Field Coy. 23 WW1 27/08/1916 Born in Hedenham Edward Carleton East George B. CROWE WW1 not found Carleton Arthur East Son of William and Ellen Dawson, of East Carleton. DAWSON Private 16278 Norfolk Regt. 3rd Bn. 25 WW1 06/03/1915 William Carleton Buried at Felixstowe (Walton) cemetery William 18th Div. East Son of Mary Ann and the late John William ROWLING Driver 92890 Royal Field Artillery 25 WW1 13/08/1918 Joseph Ammunition Col. Carleton Rowling of East Carleton Ernest East formerly (8866) Cambridgeshire Regt. SPARKES Private 42980 South Staffordshire Regt. 2nd Bn. 37 WW1 05/05/1918 Herbert Carleton [Unconfirmed as the man on the memorial] East Also remembered at Swardeston. John Henry STEWARD Major - Norfolk Regt. 3rd Bn. 51 WW1 10/05/1915 Carleton Buried at East Carleton George The Queen's (Royal West East Son of Alice Townsend, of East Carleton, Norwich, TOWNSEND Private G/21335 2nd Bn. 20 WW1 13/05/1917 Arthur Surrey Regt.) Carleton and the late Robert Townsend. WW2 Casualties None recorded Arthur William DAWSON at Walton, nr. Felixstowe John Henry STEWARD (image © Evelyn Simak) Disclaimer. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this record, no guarantee of 100% accuracy is given or implied.
    [Show full text]
  • East Carleton & Ketteringham Parish Council Newsletter
    East Carleton & Ketteringham Parish Council Newsletter Spring Edition 2010 April 2010 Bluebell walk at A11 gap closure Ketteringham Hall th 8 & 9th May The Quarry a brief history Shooting in Ketteringham Why not volunteer for the new quarry sub Parish Council contacts committee Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Chairman’s Message Dear Friend and Neighbour I count myself privileged every day to be living in this beautiful part of the world where we have open spaces, fresh air and abundant wildlife. Although we grumble about some of the issues that we face here in East Carleton and Ketteringham, you only have to look at the news on the TV every morning to realise how fortunate we are. Some of the issues that regularly face us are traffic, speeding and road maintenance, development and planning, flooding and renewable energy as well as trespassing and fly tipping. Fortunately no volcanoes! We debate these issues and make our representations regularly at meetings and follow them up through the clerk with letters expressing our concerns. There are times when we manage to achieve our aims and there are times when we do not. But we continue to strive together for the common good. I hope to think that, going forward, we can also achieve this with the quarry project. There has been a recent surge in interest regarding the quarry project and it is heartening to see so many more people taking a keen interest, which has not been the case up to now. However, there has been some misinformation being circulated within the villages that has been less than helpful and that may have compromised some of the excellent progress that has been made over the last five years.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Norwich Local Plan Site Proposals Document
    Greater Norwich Local Plan Site Proposals document Contents Page Page 1 Introduction 5 2 Settlement Summaries and Sites 12 3 Broadland 12 o Horsford 56 o Acle 16 o Horsham & Newton St. Faiths 61 o Attlebridge 17 o Horstead & Stanninghall 64 o Aylsham 21 o Lingwood & Burlingham 65 o Beighton 22 o Marsham 68 o Blofield 24 o Panxworth 71 o Blofield Heath 26 o Postwick 72 o Brundall 28 o Rackheath 75 o Buxton with Lamas 30 o Reedham 78 o Cantley 31 o Reepham 79 o Cawston 33 o Salhouse 83 o Coltishall & Horstead 35 o South Walsham 87 o Crostwick 36 o Spixworth 89 o Drayton 40 o Sprowston 90 o Felthorpe 41 o Strumpshaw 94 o Foulsham 43 o Taverham 96 o Frettenham 44 o Thorpe St. Andrew 98 o Gt & Lt Plumstead 47 o Weston Longville 101 o Gt Witchingham & Lenwade 49 o Woodbastwick 102 o Hainford 51 o Wroxham 103 o Hellesdon 53 o Hevingham 54 o Honningham 2 4 Norwich 105 5 South Norfolk 125 X o Alpington & Yelverton 125 o Hingham 226 o Ashby St Mary 126 o Keswick 230 o Aslacton 127 o Ketteringham 232 o Ashwellthorpe & Fundenhall 130 o Kirby Cane 234 o 132 236 Barford o Little Melton o Barnham Broom 134 o Loddon & Chedgrave 240 o Bawburgh 136 o Long Stratton 244 o Bergh Apton 139 o Marlingford & Colton 247 o Bixley 142 o Morley 250 o Bracon Ash 144 o Mulbarton 252 o Bramerton 147 o Mundham 254 o Bressingham 148 o Needham 255 o Brockdish (inc Thorpe Abbotts) 149 o Newton Flotman 257 o Brooke 150 o Norton Subcourse 259 o Broome 153 o Poringland 260 o Bunwell 155 o Pulham Market 265 o Burston and Shimpling 158 o Pulham St Mary 267 o Caistor St Edmund
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly List of Decisions Made During Week
    Weekly List - Application Decisions made during the Week Ending 18 December 2020 Committee applications are considered by the Planning Committee. Delegated applications are considered by Planning Services. 1. Appl Number : 2020/2267 Parish: Aldeby App Type : Non Material Amendment Location : Krismara Station Road Aldeby NR34 0BY Proposal : Non Material Amendment from 2020/0601 - Change of roof tiles from Redland 49 type to Crest Planum Concrete - Anthracite Grey Decision : Approval with no Conditions Delegated Date of decision : 14 December 2020 2. Appl Number : 2020/0775 Parish: Aslacton App Type : Approval of Condition Details Location : Western Farm Plantation Road Aslacton NR15 2ER Proposal : Details for condition 4, 6, 9, 10,12, 13, 16 and 18 of 2019/1665 - (4) Soft landscaping, (6) Noise mitigation strategy (9) Odours management plan (10) Insect management plan (12) New Access Detail (13) Existing Access Detail (16) Materials (18) Biodiversity plan Decision : Approval of details - Approved Delegated Date of decision : 14 December 2020 3. Appl Number : 2020/1963 Parish: Bawburgh App Type : Works to trees in Conservation Area Location : 4 Bawburgh Mill Harts Lane Bawburgh NR9 3LS Proposal : (T1) Willow - fell (T2) Ash - fell (T3) Ash - fell (T4) Poplar - fell (T5) Poplar - fell (T6 & 7) Willow - fell (T8) Silver Birch - fell (T11) Acer - fell (T12) Ash - fell (T13) Ash - fell (T14) Poplar - fell (T15) Ash - fell (G1) Beech x 4 - crown-lift to 8m above footpath/reduce canopy by 30%, reducing overall height to 20m (T16) Beech- crown-lift
    [Show full text]
  • EARSHAM MAP SET Soul Choice Norfolk House
    Ditchingham CP B A Earsham CP GNLP0390 GNLP0218 Bungay CP WAVENEY DISTRICT GREATER NORWICH LOCAL PLAN Key Map set showing Submitted Submitted Sites ± Sites in Earsham Parish Flixton CP Broads Authority Boundary ( where applicable ) 1:10,000 Parish Boundary © Crown Copyright and database right 2016.Ordnance Survey: Broadland District Council - 100022319 Norwich City Council - 100019747 South Norfolk District Council - 100019483 EARSHAM MAP SET Soul Choice Norfolk House Gothic House GP Clevedon 1 20 Woodland View Driveways Woodlands 9.8m 17 25 26 Houses LB 16 Jo-An MARSH LANE Springtime TCB Orchard Cottage Council 5 Abattoir BEECH TREE WAY Brambles Beechwood Homefield THE STREET Swift House 9 26 Old 8 Brambles Station 24 2 House 1 Hawthorns Copperbeech STATION ROAD 7 The Conifers 11 Old Ale 13 House Wyvern 1 SIDINGS 14 19 Garage Rozelle 7 5 Corner Cosy Pond THE Wynnward Lynward 11 LB 8 6 4 Cottage Rackhams Nook 22 6 3 Daywood 9 A 143 1 2 1 3 15 17 1 Church Path War Meml Cottages Workings 1 PH 8.2m 8 8 19 27 Church Path Hall DUKESWAY 27 GREEN MILESTONE THE Earsham El Sub Sta 31 2 10 16 13 Church Path LANE 33 35 1 4 37 8 A 143 Juniper Cott 39 10 Waveney 28 House 12 3 WAVENEY CRESCENT 6 Kingsbury House Ashwold Lodge Farm 7 Mile End Villa MS Earsham The Lodge Earsham CP Cottage 19 Woodcroft Meadow View Belmont The Otters CHURCH ROAD GNLP0218 Farm Ppg Sta View Mile End Pond VALLEY CLOSE GP 7 8 Allotment Gardens 1 Lodge House 4 10.5m 2 Pine Trees Subway Sunrise Track LANE Fn ACRE FIVE 9.3m The Moorings The Coach House Pen House Church Farm 11.2m
    [Show full text]
  • South Norfolk Council Electoral Review
    South Norfolk Council Electoral Review Warding Patterns Submission September 2016 1 Contents 1. Foreword 2. Introduction 2. Proposed Warding Arrangements 3. Equality of Representation 4. Community Identities and Interests 5. Convenient and effective local government 6. Conclusion 1. Foreword South Norfolk is earmarked for significant growth. By 2022, the number of electors within parts of our District, including Costessey, Wymondham and Long Stratton will have increased substantially. We have been required, as a result of the present electoral variance within the Old Costessey Ward to undertake a review of the District Ward Boundaries at this stage, even though we recognise that ideally this process would have followed on from a Parish Boundary review. Having sought clarity regarding the criteria employed by the Local Government Boundary Commission to undertake this review, we have felt compelled to employ a strict adherence to the “10% principle” – that no ward should be more or less than 10% from the average and, in practice, as close to the average as possible. We must redraw the lines following the requirements of the Commission, ensuring that a Parish does not sit in two different District Wards, unless it is also warded. However, this has led to a number of dilemmas in fine-tuning our proposals that our communities will rightly highlight to you. Nonetheless, as much as our communities may favour alternative arrangements, we also recognise that just because a Parish or Town lies in a different District Ward, our communities do not necessarily change. Community organisations will still bind them together, based on their commonalities – and in some cases differences.
    [Show full text]
  • Hornsea Project Three Offshore Wind Farm Preliminary Environmental Information Report
    Hornsea Project Three Offshore Wind Farm Hornsea Project Three Offshore Wind Farm Preliminary Environmental Information Report: Annex 4.5 – Visual Receptors for the Onshore Infrastructure Date: July 2017 Annex 4.5 – Visual Receptors for Onshore Infrastructure Preliminary Environmental Information Report July 2017 Environmental Impact Assessment Preliminary Environmental Information Report Liability Volume 6 This report has been prepared by RPS, with all reasonable skill, care and diligence within the terms of their contracts with DONG Energy Power (UK) Ltd. Annex 4.5 Visual Receptors for the Onshore Infrastructure Report Number: P6.6.4.5 Version: Final Date: July 2017 This report is also downloadable from the Hornsea Project Three offshore wind farm website at: www.dongenergy.co.uk/hornseaproject3 DONG Energy Power (UK) Ltd. 5 Howick Place, Prepared by: RPS London, SW1P 1WG Checked by: Jennifer Brack © DONG Energy Power (UK) Ltd, 2017. All rights reserved Accepted by: Sophie Banham Front cover picture: Kite surfer near one of DONG Energy's UK offshore wind farms © DONG Energy Hornsea Approved by: Sophie Banham Project Three (UK) Ltd., 2016. i Annex 4.5 – Visual Receptors for Onshore Infrastructure Preliminary Environmental Information Report July 2017 List of Tables Table 1.1: Onshore Cable Corridor – Western Route Option- Locations of Visual Receptors by Parish. .............. 1 Table 1.2: Eastern Onshore Cable Corridor Option – Loations of Visual Receptors by Parish ............................. 2 Table.1.3: Onshore Cable Corridor South of Convergence of the Western and Eastern Options – Locations of Visual Receptors by Parish .................................................................................................................. 3 Table 1.4: Onshore HVAC Booster Station – Locations of Visual Receptors by Parish .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Parish and Town Council Submissions to the South Norfolk District Council Electoral Review
    Parish and Town Council submissions to the South Norfolk District Council electoral review This PDF document contains submissions from anonymous local residents. Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks. Kingsley, Paul From: Yahoo! Account Sent: 19 December 2016 14:55 To: reviews Subject: Draft Recommendations on the new electoral arrangements for SNDC Attachments: pc.docx Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Good afternoon, Please see attached the views of Alburgh Parish Council. Jackie Ellis Clerk to Alburgh Parish Council 1 Draft Recommendations for new electoral arrangements Views of Alburgh Parish Council: We do not agree with your recommendations for many reasons. Please see below: Our proposed new ward is too large. At present we share a ward with four other parishes which are important to us, most especially Wortwell. We do not agree with your new plans to separate Alburgh and Wortwell as we have very strong historic parish links. To separate these would be extremely detrimental to our local community. Transport Links: There are no good links across our proposed ward. There is a bus service to Wortwell, Harleston, Denton and Norwich. There is no bus service to Bungay other than the school bus. There are no links with the east of the ward. Community Groups: At present we hold joint meetings with 5 parish councils once a year. They are Alburgh, Wortwell, Denton, Topcroft and Earsham. People from our parish attend events in Wortwell and likewise with people coming to our events. Children from Wortwell come to Alburgh and Denton Primary School.
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolkancestor New Cover.Qxd
    The Norfolk Ancestor Hare and Hounds, Halvergate c1913 - see Notes and Queries Volume Six Part One MARCH 2009 The Journal of the Norfolk Family History Society 59 High Street, East Ham. See article Memories of a Norfolk Village formerly Norfolk & Norwich Genealogical Society Does anyone recognise the orchestra or the venue? Can you help Mr Norton with his query on the Claxton's and Kelf's? (see Notes and Queries) NORFOLK FAMILY HISTORY SOCIETY A private company limited by guarantee Registered in England, Company No. 3194731 Registered as a Charity - Registration No. 1055410 Registered Office address: Kirby Hall, 70 St. Giles Street, ______________________________________________________________________________ HEADQUARTERS and LIBRARY Kirby Hall, 70 St Giles Street, Norwich NR2 1LS Tel: (01603) 763718 Email address: [email protected] NFHS Web pages:<http://www.norfolkfhs.org.uk BOARD OF TRUSTEES Malcolm Cole-Wilkin (P.R. Transcripts) Denagh Hacon (Editor, Ancestor) Brenda Leedell (West Norfolk Branch) Pat Mason (Company Secretary) Mary Mitchell (Monumental Inscriptions) Edmund Perry (Projects Coordinator) Colin Quantrill Colin Skipper (Chairman) Jean Stangroom (Membership Secretary) Carole Taylor (Treasurer) Patricia Wills-Jones (East Norfolk Branch, Strays) EDITORIAL COMMITTEE Denagh Hacon (Editor) Edmund Perry (Assistant Editor) Julie Hansell (Copy Typist) Current Rates for Membership: UK Membership: £10.00 per year. Overseas Airmail £12.00 per year Joint Membership: £15.00 per year. Joint Overseas Airmail £18.00 per year UK Single
    [Show full text]
  • Cringleford Parish Council Neighbourhood Development Plan 2013-2026 Consultation Statement July 2013
    CRINGLEFORD PARISH COUNCIL NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2013-2026 CONSULTATION STATEMENT JULY 2013 Neighbourhood Planning Regulations 2012. Section 15(2) of Part 5 of the Regulations Introduction Early in 2011 Cringleford Parish Council were approached by South Norfolk District Council and asked to produce a Neighbourhood Development Plan as a follow up to our recently produced Parish Plan. We were offered this as part of the Front Runners Project and in May 2011 Cringleford Parish Council were confirmed as a Front Runner. In September 2011 Cringleford Parish Council set up a sub committee of the Chairman, 4 Councillors and the Parish Clerk to progress the Neighbourhood Development Plan and the first sub committee meeting was held on 9 th September 2011. Initial Exhibition A Public Exhibition was held by South Norfolk Council to advertise the Joint Core Strategy and Site Specific Allocations at Waitrose Car Park on 8 th October 2011 and the Parish Council joined with them to get the publics opinion on the need for a Neighbourhood Development Plan. The general consensus was a Neighbourhood Development Plan was a positive way forward for the village. Statement of Community Involvement A Statement of Community Involvement was produced and advertised on the Council’s website setting out how the Council would communicate with parishioners and the statutory consultees. Public Exhibition Weekend – Vision and Objectives Cringleford Parish Council then held a Public Exhibition and all parishioners and statutory consultees were invited by written invitation. The Exhibition was held on 25 th /26 th November 2011 at the Pavilion, Oakfields Road, Cringleford and invited comments and observations from the 109 parishioners and statutory consultees in attendance.
    [Show full text]
  • The South Norfolk (Parish Electoral Arrangements and Electoral Changes) Order 2007
    STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2007 No. 485 LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENGLAND The South Norfolk (Parish Electoral Arrangements and Electoral Changes) Order 2007 Made - - - - 21st February 2007 Coming into force in accordance with article 1(2) and 1(3) South Norfolk District Council, under section 9(a) of the Local Government and Rating Act 1997(b) (“the 1997 Act”), have made to the Electoral Commission(c) proposals dated February 2007 for electoral arrangements in the parishes of Diss, Roydon and Wymondham(d) in the district of South Norfolk and for electoral changes to thirteen wards of the district of South Norfolk and five electoral divisions of the county of Norfolk: The Electoral Commission have decided to give effect to those proposals and, in relation to the changes made on 1st April 2003 affecting the parishes of Alburgh, Bressingham, Bunwell, Carleton Rode, Chedgrave, Colney, Cringleford, Diss, East Carleton, Ellingham, Forncett, Geldeston, Heckingham, Hethersett, Heywood, Ketteringham, Langley with Hardley, Little Melton, Loddon, Redenhall with Harleston, Roydon, Starston, Swardeston, Tacolneston and Wymondham(e), to make related alterations of the boundaries of the wards of the district of South Norfolk referred to in column (1) of Schedule 1, and the electoral divisions of the county of Norfolk referred to in column (1) of Schedule 2: Accordingly, the Electoral Commission, in exercise of the powers conferred by sections 14(f) and 23(g) of the 1997 Act, make the following Order: Citation and commencement 1.—(1) This Order may be cited as the South Norfolk (Parish Electoral Arrangements and Electoral Changes) Order 2007. (2) This Order, with the exception of article 7 and Schedule 2, comes into force— (a) This section has been amended by the Local Government Commission for England (Transfer of Functions) Order 2001 (S.I.
    [Show full text]