Together Rhode Island Analysis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Together Rhode Island Analysis Together Rhode Island Analysis Prepared for: Rhode Island Foundation One Union Station Providence, RI 02903 August 2018 REPORT Faculty: Skye Leedahl Melanie Brasher Shanna Pearson-Merkowitz Student Researchers: Travis Doumaney Kristin Sodhi The University of Rhode Island URI Social Science Institute for Research, Social Science Institute for Education, and Policy. Research, Education and Policy University of Rhode Island Kingston, RI 02881 uri.edu/ssirep About The Rhode Island Foundation Founded in 1916, the Rhode Island Foundation is the state’s community foundation. The mission of the Rhode Island Foundation is to be a proactive community and philanthropic leader dedicated to meeting the needs of the people of Rhode Island. The Rhode Island Foundation is the largest funder of Rhode Island's nonprofit sector. In addition, the Foundation works to achieve its goals by: evaluating community issues and making strategic grants, promoting and building effective philanthropy, stewarding permanent endowments and honoring donor intent and current needs, building the strengths and capacity of the nonprofit sector, providing leadership to and a forum for civil dialogue on important issues, and growing their endowments through disciplined and quality investments. Together RI The Rhode Island Foundation launched Together RI in March 2018. It was a series of 20 community events at locations throughout Rhode Island that took place between March 22nd and May 5th, 2018. The events were held at schools, community centers and other locally known places. The purpose of these events was to gather and share information about challenges, successes, and solutions within the state. Additionally, the Rhode Island Foundation wanted to hear from, and encourage dialogue between, all Rhode Islanders and hoped to encourage civic participation. The Foundation felt it was important to create a space for listening, reconnecting, and inspiring civil dialogue at a time when people are more “connected” via social media, yet more disconnected from each other personally, than ever. The events were open to the public and community members were encouraged to attend. Family-style complimentary meals were provided, and participants were encouraged to sit at a table to share their ideas and opinions about various topics, face-to-face with each other. The Rhode Island Foundation hired independent facilitators to moderate and guide the discussions. The Foundation hoped that participants would meet someone new and leave knowing that their voice was heard. Afterwards, University of Rhode Island researchers helped to synthesize the results. The Social Science Institute for Research, Education, and Policy The Social Science Institute for Research, Education, and Policy (SSIREP) at the University of Rhode Island is a campus-wide consortium that brings together strong campus units including political science, economics, sociology, anthropology, psychology, philosophy, English, languages, computer science and statistics, history, gender and women’s studies, nursing, pharmacy, Africana studies, environmental and natural resource economics, marine affairs, education, business, human development, engineering, communications, and labor studies. The SSIREP fosters interdisciplinary programs in scholarly research, teaching and learning, and outreach to students, faculty, business, government, and the community. In addition, SSIREP’s affiliated faculty conduct program and policy evaluations for Rhode Island’s government and nonprofit agencies. For more information, visit: https://web.uri.edu/ssirep/ 1 Faculty Authors Skye Leedahl is an Assistant Professor in the Departments of Human Development & Family Studies and Political Science at the University of Rhode Island. She received a Ph.D. from the University of Kansas in 2013. Her research is focused on social integration and environments for older adults, and she teaches courses on physical environments for older adults, policy issues in health and aging, research methods, and public program evaluation. She has published in high- quality gerontology journals, and has received awards for her research, most recently from the University of Rhode Island Council for Research. Melanie Brasher is an Assistant Professor in the Departments of Sociology & Anthropology and Human Development & Family Studies at the University of Rhode Island. She received a Ph.D. in Sociology from Duke University in 2013. Her research is focused on intergenerational relations, social determinants of health, and population aging. She teaches courses on aging and life the course, family, health, and research methods. Much of her research has focused on the well-being of older adults in China, and she continues to collaborate on research with scholars at the China CDC in Beijing. Shanna Pearson-Merkowitz is the director of the Social Science Institute for Research, Education, and Policy and an Associate Professor at the University of Rhode Island. She received her Ph.D. from the University of Maryland, College Park in 2009. Her research and teaching interests are in workforce, education, and housing policy, economic inequality, and American politics. Her work has been funded by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Russell Sage Foundation, and her scholarly manuscripts have appeared in some of the top political science journals. Student Authors Travis Doumaney is an alum of The School for International Training’s International Honors Program, where he studied comparative Human Rights challenges and advocacy. He is now studying Political Science and Computer Science at the University of Rhode Island. Kristin Sodhi is a graduate student in the International Relations program at the University of Rhode Island. 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary ...........................................................................................................4 1. Rhode Island Foundation Together RI Individual Survey Report 1.1. Introduction...................................................................................................................7 1.2. Demographic Information.............................................................................................7 1.3. Encouraging and Challenging Topics Discussed..........................................................9 1.4. Tone of the Conversation..............................................................................................19 1.5. Community Engagement...............................................................................................22 1.6. How Participants Heard About the Event .....................................................................24 2. Rhode Island Foundation Together RI Discussion Questions Report 2.1. Summary of Findings..................................................................................................29 2.2. Major Categories Summary.........................................................................................31 2.3. Rhode Island’s Biggest Strength.................................................................................41 2.4. Rhode Island’s Biggest Opportunity...........................................................................46 2.5. Challenges That Impact Daily Life.............................................................................54 2.6. Proud About Rhode Island ..........................................................................................63 2.7. Positive Sense of Community in Rhode Island...........................................................65 2.8. Personal Time Working to Improve the State or Community.....................................68 2.9. Most Frequent Topics from Each Community Event..................................................71 Appendix A: Encouraging and Challenging Topics by Town......................................95 Appendix B: Survey Analysis Research Methodology................................................100 Appendix C: Discussion Questions and Survey...........................................................103 Appendix D: Discussion Analysis Research Methodology..........................................107 3 Executive Summary In 2018 the Rhode Island Foundation held 20 community events at locations throughout the state between March 22nd and May 5th. The initiative was named “Together RI.” The purpose of these events was to gather and share information about challenges, successes, and solutions within the state. Community members were invited to attend the events, where complimentary meals were provided, and participants were encouraged to sit at a table to share their ideas and opinions about the various topics. The Rhode Island Foundation helped to moderate the discussions. Nearly 1,300 people participated in the events. Participants were asked to fill out a form regarding what they discussed at their table and a survey about the event. The data analysis of the discussion form and survey results was performed by the University of Rhode Island's Social Science Institute for Research, Education, and Policy (SSIREP) using manual and automated analysis techniques. Together RI at a Glance: • The youngest Together RI participant was three and a half months old, the eldest was a 92-year-old Holocaust survivor. • Nearly 1,000 participants completed surveys asking them about their experience. • Just under 20 percent were under 45 years old; about 35 percent were 65 or older. • Nearly 65 percent of survey respondents were women and nearly 35 percent
Recommended publications
  • Marginalized Communities Advocates - Network (MCA-N)
    A Survey Report On How the Marginalized Communities in IDP sites in Mogadishu and Kismayo Perceive Their Exclusion Prepared and Submitted By: Marginalized Communities Advocates - Network (MCA-N) Contact: +252615459079-+254714378034-Email: [email protected] Website: www.mcadvoc.org (July – August, 2019 Page 1 of 17 Table of Contents Particulars Page Cover page 1 Table of contents 2 Acknowledgements 3 1.0 Report Summary 4 2.0 MCA-Network Brief Background 4 3.0 Assessment Introduction and Background 5 4.0 Assessment Report Goal and Purpose 6 5.0 Assessment Report Findings 6-14 6.0 Recommendations and Way forward 14 8.0 Conclusion 15-17 Page 2 of 17 Acknowledgements As we present this report, we wish to recognize the role played by all Participants whose very active and contributions ensured success in the study and reporting. The region’s security system equally made great effort to ensure successful implementation of the study despite the existing security challenges in the regions. This study would not have been possible without the financial and technical support of UNHCR. We are therefore very grateful to all of those with whom we have had the pleasure to work with from planning stages to the actual implementation of the assessment. It is MCA-Network’s belief that our Knowledge and Experience with local communities have placed us at an advantage to ensure greater quality in service delivery and sustainable working partnership between the Network organizations and the people of both Kismayo and Mogadishu regions and beyond. May we also express our sincere gratitude to the various stakeholders including among others the following: Relevant Local and National Authorities, IDP camps managements, Community elders and leaders, Religious leaders, among others who have facilitated our work to this end.
    [Show full text]
  • The Other War Gang Rape in Somaliland
    The Other War Gang Rape in Somaliland A Report by the Strategic Initiative for Women in the Horn of Africa (SIHA) Compiled by Alicia Luedke The Other War Gang Rape in Somaliland A report by the Strategic Initiative for Women in the Horn of Africa ©SIHA Network 2015 First Published December 2015 All rights reserved. Materials may be freely disseminated and used for educational, activist, and non-profit purposes, with due acknowledgement of the source. Otherwise, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior permission of Strategic Initiative for Women in the Horn of Africa (SIHA) Network Cover Photo by SIHA Network Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................................ 2 Acronyms .................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Preface ....................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 Historical and Socio-Cultural Background 7 Clan Authority and Influence .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Findings from Questionnaire on Inclusion of Marginalized Groups
    Findings from the Humanitarian Response Plan (HRP) Partner Questionnaire: Inclusion of Marginalized Groups in Humanitarian Programs Protection Cluster March 2021 Introduction This report focuses on inclusion of marginalized communities in humanitarian programming toward a better understanding of how partners are implementing the HCT Centrality of Protection (COP) Strategy priority: Enhancing ways to identify and address differential forms of exclusion, including those based on societal discrimination, power structures, vulnerability, age, and gender; and strengthening inclusion of and ensuring accountability by community based and other non-traditional humanitarian responders, for more effective protection to affected populations. This is a critical issue for the humanitarian response, and it is commendable that the HCT has prioritized the issue for the COP strategy since 2018. In 2020 there were a number of initiatives to move forward on the implementation of the strategy, including increased data collection on marginalized and minority groups. This report provides an overview of responses to a questionnaire on inclusion of marginalized groups in the humanitarian response. The questionnaire was developed by the Protection Cluster and administered online in December 2020 to partners of the HRP2021. These findings are based on responses from 105 partners (Refer to Annex I for the list of participating organizations). Ensuring the centrality of protection is the responsibility of all humanitarian actors and not limited to the Protection Cluster and its partners. The request for participation in the online questionnaire was shared with partners across all clusters. The questionnaire contributes to a better understanding of how partners are defining marginalization and what partners are doing to identify and include marginalized groups in their practices and projects.
    [Show full text]
  • African Studies Quarterly
    African Studies Quarterly Volume 15, Issue 4 September 2015 Published by the Center for African Studies, University of Florida ISSN: 2152-2448 African Studies Quarterly | Volume 15, Issue 4| September 2015 http://www.africa.ufl.edu/asq African Studies Quarterly Executive Staff R. Hunt Davis, Jr. - Editor-in-Chief Todd H. Leedy - Associate Editor Anna Mwaba and Fezile Mtsetfwa - Managing Editors Jessica Horwood - Book Review Editor Editorial Committee Oumar Ba Ibrahim Yahaya Ibrahim Fred Boaten Merise Jalalal Lina Benabdallah Yang Jiao Mamadou Bodian Therese Kennelly-Okraku Jennifer Boylan Cecilia Kyalo Ben Burgen Nicholas Knowlton Jessica Casimir Eric Lake Amanda Edgell Chesney McOmber Dan Eizenga Collins R. Nunyonameh Ryan Good Caroline Staub Victoria Gorham Donald Underwood Sheldon Wardwell Emily Hauser Joel O. Wao Advisory Board Adélékè Adéèko Richard Marcus Ohio State University California State University, Long Beach Timothy Ajani Kelli Moore Fayetteville State University James Madison University Abubakar Alhassan Mantoa Rose Motinyane Bayero University University of Cape Town John W. Arthur James T. Murphy University of South Florida, St. Clark University Petersburg Lilian Temu Osaki Nanette Barkey University of Dar es Salaam Plan International USA Dianne White Oyler Susan Cooksey Fayetteville State University University of Florida Alex Rödlach Mark Davidheiser Creighton University Nova Southeastern University Jan Shetler Kristin Davis Goshen College International Food Policy Research Roos Willems Institute Catholic University of Leuven Parakh Hoon Peter VonDoepp Virginia Tech University of Vermont Andrew Lepp Kent State University African Studies Quarterly | Volume 15, Issue 4| September 2015 http://www.africa.ufl.edu/asq © University of Florida Board of Trustees, a public corporation of the State of Florida; permission is hereby granted for individuals to download articles for their own personal use.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Distr
    UNITED NATIONS A General Assembly Distr. GENERAL A/CONF.211/SR.7 30 April 2009 Original: ENGLISH DURBAN REVIEW CONFERENCE SUMMARY RECORD OF THE 7th MEETING Held at the Palais des Nations, Geneva, on Thursday, 23 April 2009, 10 a.m. President: Mr. WAKO (Kenya) later: Mr. PORTALES (Chile) (Vice-President) later: Ms. FARANI AZEVÊDO (Brazil) (Vice-President) CONTENTS HIGH-LEVEL SEGMENT (continued) STATEMENT BY THE DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER AND MINISTER FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF BELGIUM GENERAL SEGMENT (continued) This record is subject to correction. Corrections should be submitted in one of the working languages. They should be set forth in a memorandum and also incorporated in a copy of the record. They should be sent within one week of the date of this document to the Editing Unit, room E.4108, Palais des Nations, Geneva. Any corrections to the records of the public meetings held during this session will be consolidated in a single corrigendum, to be issued shortly after the end of the session. GE.09-12955 (E) 270409 300409 A/CONF.211/SR.7 page 2 The meeting was called to order at 10.20 a.m. HIGH-LEVEL SEGMENT (agenda item 3) (continued) STATEMENT BY THE DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER AND MINISTER FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF BELGIUM 1. Mr. DE GUCHT (Belgium) said that while some had chosen to engage in confrontation at the Review Conference and others had chosen not to attend, his country had opted for commitment and dialogue. Belgium condemned unreservedly the hate-filled statement by the President of the Islamic Republic of Iran, which ran counter to the principles and values of the United Nations, to the letter and spirit of the text that had been adopted and to the commitments undertaken by the Islamic Republic of Iran in Durban in 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • Representation of Somali Clannism in Nomad Diaries: Life, War, and America by Yasmeen Maxamuud
    ================================================================== Language in India www.languageinindia.comISSN 1930-2940 Vol. 21:3 March 2021 =================================================================== Representation of Somali Clannism in Nomad Diaries: Life, War, and America by Yasmeen Maxamuud Dr. Mansour Mohammed Ali Faraj Dr. Ali Saleh Ahmed Al-Haidari =================================================================== Courtesy: https://www.amazon.com/Nomad-Diaries-Cover-Yasmeen- Maxamuud/dp/0970858744/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=Nomad+Diaries%3A+Life%2C +War%2C+and+America&qid=1616367821&s=books&sr=1-1 Abstract Clannism is the most important issue that has played a great role in shaping all aspects of life in Somalia. Yet, it has received little attention by scholars, policy makers, and writers who concern with Somalia: its history, culture, life, civil war, state failure, and peace- building. Therefore, the ==================================================================== Language in India www.languageinindia.comISSN 1930-2940 21:3 March 2021 Dr. Mansour Mohammed Ali Faraj and Dr. Ali Saleh Ahmed Al-Haidari Representation of Somali Clannism in Nomad Diaries: Life, War, and America by Yasmeen Maxamuud 60 current study is an attempt to investigate and explore how Somali Clannism is represented in Yasmeen Maxamuud's novel Nomad Diaries: Life, War, and America. It, accordingly, examines clannism with a wide lens, seeking to understand how this important facet has affected the Somali society as represented in the novel under the study. In attempting such a broad theme in such a short study, this paper aims to introduce the reader to the key images of clannism. The study concludes that the Somali clannism is, first of all, represented as the main marker Somali individuals identify themselves and, therefore, it is viewed as a threat to national identity and social cohesion.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of the BBC Somali Service
    Debating Somali Identity in a British Tribunal: The Case of the BBC Somali Service Abdi Ismail Samatar I. Introduction The Somali Peace Conference sponsored by the Inter-Governmental Authority on Development (IGAD), held in Kenya in 2003–05, was dominated by warlords and partisan mediators.1 It endorsed a political strategy whose objective has been to recreate Somalia as a clan-based federation. Advocates of this approach claim that such a dispensation will approximate the society’s pre-colonial tradition and therefore has the best chance of restoring peace. An argument put forward in sup- port of this agenda is that Somalia’s former governments, particularly the military junta, misused public power by favoring and rewarding certain genealogical groups.2 Proponents contend that formally and openly using genealogical divisions as a basis for distributing public appointments and resources will prevent future clanist favoritism. This approach to political reconstruction mimics Ethiopia’s seemingly novel political project, which divided the country into nine “ethnic prov- inces” in 1991.3 In the case of Ethiopia, the presumed rationale for this political strategy was to overcome past domination of the state by one ethnic group, rather than to revert to an old tradition. The imposition of Amharic culture and language on Oromos, Somalis, Afars, the people of the southern region, and other groups throughout the state—and the denial of their human rights—rationalized re-engineering the new order. The challenge for Ethiopia post-1991 has been how to undo past subjugation without reifying cultural differences politically.4 Dividing each country into administrative units based on ethnic belonging, the 36 Abdi Ismail Samatar proponents argue, will promote democracy and produce a civic order in which no one ethnic group or clan dominates others.
    [Show full text]
  • Final AHDR 2004 Eng.Indb
    CHAPTER SIX Arab Societal Structures and the Regional and International Environments Introduction Clannism (al-‘asabiya) in Arab Society—the Authoritarian Paternalist System and the The societal context in Arab countries is the Family third key factor in explaining the currently deteriorating state of freedom and govern- Clannism, in all its forms, (tribal, clan-based, ance in the region. This chapter looks at communal, and ethnic) (Mohammad Abed al- Each link in the chain both the internal and external dimensions Jabiri, in Arabic, 1995) tightly shackles its fol- takes its portion of of that context. The first dimension includes lowers through the power of the authoritarian the characteristics of societal structures in patriarchal system. This phenomenon, amply freedom from the Arab countries and of the dominant (rentier) discussed in the literature (Hisham Sharabi, individual and delivers mode of production. The second dimension in Arabic, 1990), represents a two-way street relates to the impacts of the regional and in which obedience and loyalty are offered in her or him to the next, global environments surrounding the Arab return for protection, sponsorship, and a share which, in turn, steals a world, which have recently had a stronger of the spoils. influence in detracting from freedom in Clannism implants submission, parasitic further share. Arab countries, particularly in terms of na- dependence and compliance in return for tional liberation. protection and benefits. More damagingly still, clannism is the enemy of personal independ- SOCIETAL STRUCTURES ence, intellectual daring, and the flowering of a unique and authentic human entity. It blocks the energies that lead to growth and a mature, THE CHAIN THAT STIFLES self-reliant intellect.
    [Show full text]
  • Clan in Transition: Societal Changes of Villages in China from the Perspective of Water Pollution
    sustainability Article Clan in Transition: Societal Changes of Villages in China from the Perspective of Water Pollution Qidong Huang 1,*, Jiajun Xu 1 and Yongping Wei 2 1 School of Public Administration, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China; [email protected] 2 School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, the University of Queensland, 4067 Brisbane, Australia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-258-576-7526 Received: 24 November 2017; Accepted: 5 January 2018; Published: 10 January 2018 Abstract: Societal relations in rural areas have entered into a new stage of adjustment over the past decade. However, the adjustment, which might bring about profound societal changes in countryside as well as in China as a whole, have not been paid much attention and very few studies have been conducted from the perspective of ecological resource crises. We use the case of a village as an example to show how water pollution, as one of the contributory factors, possibly affect the transition of clans and societal changes in Chinese villages. Through observation and interviews, we find that there is an apparent rise of “New Clanism” within clans, which gradually abandons the tradition of supremacy of clan interests and places family or individual interests at top priority. We also find that clan boundaries get increasingly obscure since the integrity of clans is undermined by the rise of new interest groups across clans, but the boundaries remain relatively clear due to the consistency (albeit incomplete) of clan interests. Some new clan élites and representatives of new interest groups get involved in village governance, which indicates that their goals have shifted from natural resources to social or political capital.
    [Show full text]
  • Somalia: Majority Clans and Minority Groups in South and Central Somalia
    Country Policy and Information Note Somalia: Majority clans and minority groups in south and central Somalia Version 2.0 June 2017 Preface This note provides country of origin information (COI) and policy guidance to Home Office decision makers on handling particular types of protection and human rights claims. This includes whether claims are likely to justify the granting of asylum, humanitarian protection or discretionary leave and whether – in the event of a claim being refused – it is likely to be certifiable as ‘clearly unfounded’ under s94 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002. Decision makers must consider claims on an individual basis, taking into account the case specific facts and all relevant evidence, including: the policy guidance contained with this note; the available COI; any applicable caselaw; and the Home Office casework guidance in relation to relevant policies. Country Information COI in this note has been researched in accordance with principles set out in the Common EU [European Union] Guidelines for Processing Country of Origin Information (COI) and the European Asylum Support Office’s research guidelines, Country of Origin Information report methodology, namely taking into account its relevance, reliability, accuracy, objectivity, currency, transparency and traceability. All information is carefully selected from generally reliable, publicly accessible sources or is information that can be made publicly available. Full publication details of supporting documentation are provided in footnotes. Multiple sourcing is normally used to ensure that the information is accurate, balanced and corroborated, and that a comprehensive and up-to-date picture at the time of publication is provided. Information is compared and contrasted, whenever possible, to provide a range of views and opinions.
    [Show full text]
  • Leadership Personality and Social Dis-Integration in Somalia
    Asian Research Journal of Arts & Social Sciences 8(3): 1-9, 2019; Article no.ARJASS.47139 ISSN: 2456-4761 Leadership Personality and Social Dis-integration in Somalia Abdisamad Hassan1*, Zawiyah Mohd Zain2 and Mohd Na’iem Ajis2 1School of Government, University Utara Malaysia, Malaysia. 2School of Government, College of Law, Government and International Studies, University Utara Malaysia, Malaysia. Authors’ contributions This work was carried out in collaboration between all authors. All authors designed the study, performed the analysis, wrote the protocol, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Article Information DOI:10.9734/ARJASS/2019/v8i330101 Editor(s): (1) Dr. Raffaela Giovagnoli, Pontifical Lateran University, Piazza San Giovanni in Laterano 4, Rome, Italy. Reviewers: (1) Md. Amir Hossain, IBAIS University, Bangladesh. (2) Zaiton Binti Osman, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia. Complete Peer review History: http://www.sdiarticle3.com/review-history/47139 Received 28 October 2018 Accepted 30 January 2019 Original Research Article Published 28 February 2019 ABSTRACT The study seeks to explore the impact of leadership personalities of previous Somali political leaders on social integration. As Somalia now transit into post conflict reconstruction, there is the need to explore how previous flaws in leadership personalities resulted into social disintegration of the Somali society. To achieve this objective, qualitative interviews were held with 13 respondents across Somali elite in Mogadishu. Using the Big Five personality framework, the results revealed that previous Somali leadership personalities were deeply flawed due to colonial legacy and influence of clannism. In addition, fear of losing and retaining power at all cost instituted clannism as a means on obtaining and retaining political power, thereby compromising unity and social integration.
    [Show full text]
  • Currenttrends in ISLAMIST IDEOLOGY
    CT 26 finals_Layout 1 20-07-16 11:45 AM Page 1 CurrentTrends IN ISLAMIST IDEOLOGY VOLUME 26 July, 2020 ■ HOW ISLAMISTS ARE RUINING ISLAM Mustafa Akyol ■ THE EVOLUTION OF EAST AFRICAN SALAFI-JIHADISM James Barnett ■ OBSERVATIONS ON THE ISLAMIC STATE IN IRAN Mehdi Khalaji ■ HOW THE IRANIAN REVOLUTION INSPIRED TURKISH IS- LAMISM Svante E. Cornell and M. K. Kaya ■ QASSEM SOLEIMANI’S FALL AND THE BATTLE TO COME IN IRAQ Ranj Alaaldin ■ EUROPE FRETS, AMERICA YAWNS: THE TRANS-ATLANTIC GAP ON DOMESTIC ISLAMISM Lorenzo Vidino Hudson Institute Center on Islam, Democracy, and the Future of the Muslim World CT 26 finals_Layout 1 20-07-16 11:45 AM Page 1 CurrentTrends IN ISLAMIST IDEOLOGY VOLUME 26 Edited by Hillel Fradkin, Husain Haqqani, and Eric Brown Hudson Institute Center on Islam, Democracy, and the Future of the Muslim World CT 26 finals_Layout 1 20-07-16 11:45 AM Page 2 © 2020 Hudson Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. ISSN: 1940-834X For more information about obtaining additional copies of this or other Hudson Institute publica- tions, please visit Hudson’s website at www.hudson.org/bookstore or call toll free: 1-888-554-1325. ABOUT HUDSON INSTITUTE Hudson Institute is a nonpartisan, independent policy research organization dedicated to innova- tive research and analysis that promotes global security, prosperity, and freedom. Founded in 1961 by strategist Herman Kahn, Hudson Institute challenges conventional thinking and helps man- age strategic transitions to the future through interdisciplinary studies in defense, international re- lations, economics, health care, technology, culture, and law. With offices in Washington and New York, Hud son seeks to guide public policymakers and global leaders in government and business through a vigorous program of publications, conferences, policy briefings, and recommendations.
    [Show full text]