DOCSLIB.ORG

Executive Intelligence Review, Volume 36, Number 6, February 13

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Executive Intelligence Review, Volume 36, Number 6, February 13 Executive Intelligence Review EIRFebruary 13, 2009 Vol. 36 No. 6 www.larouchepub.com $10.00 Lyndon LaRouche on ‘The Meaning of Physical Time’ Helga Zepp-LaRouche: In a Crisis, Don’t Consult Morons Like ‘Free Energy,’ There's No Such Thing as ‘Free Money’ The Astounding High Cost of ‘Free’ Energy Keep Up with 21st CENTURY SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Featured in Spring 2008 • WHAT, EXACTLY, IS A HUMAN BEING? Analog, Digital, and Transcendental Sky Shields • HOW NORBERT WIENER ATTEMPTED TO KILL SCIENCE • Only Diseased Minds Believe in Entropy Creighton Cody Jones • Where Your Computers Really Came From REAL CO2 MEASUREMENTS VS. GLOBAL WARMERS’ FABRICATION Peter Martinson (1920-1961) NORTHERN HEMISPHERE • LIFE WITHIN THE NOÖSPHERE: 440 430 420 410 What Is the Human Mind? 400 Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr. 390 380 370 • THE HISTORICAL DATA THE IPCC IGNORED 360 350 340 180 Years of Atmospheric CO 2 330 320 Gas Analysis by Chemical Methods 310 Ernst-Georg Beck 300 Thousands of direct chemical measurements of CO concen- 290 2 280 tration in the atmosphere since the mid-19th Century show that the current claim of human-induced CO2 increase is a willful fraud. Malaysia’s Agricultural Breakthrough, and Nuclear Desalination, Can Feed the World Mohd Peter Davis Subscribe! Large grass farms that produce Electronic subscriptions are fast-growing food for animals, and enclosed, climate-controlled animal $25 for 6 issues, houses can provide the protein to $48 for 12 issues. feed the world. Single electronic copy is $5. Available at www.21stcenturysciencetech.com or send check/money order to 21st Century P.O. Box 16285, Washington, D.C. 20041 Founder and Contributing Editor: Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr. Editorial Board: Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr., Antony Papert, Gerald Rose, Dennis Small, Edward Spannaus, Nancy Spannaus, Jeffrey Steinberg, EI R William Wertz Editor: Nancy Spannaus Managing Editor: Susan Welsh Assistant Managing Editor: Bonnie James Science Editor: Marjorie Mazel Hecht From the Managing Editor Technology Editor: Marsha Freeman Book Editor: Katherine Notley Graphics Editor: Alan Yue Photo Editor: Stuart Lewis Circulation Manager: Stanley Ezrol hat many people want to know, is: What is really the difference INTELLIGENCE DIRECTORS W Counterintelligence: Jeffrey Steinberg, Michele between Lyndon LaRouche’s science of physical economy, and what Steinberg Economics: John Hoefle,Marcia Merry Baker, every other economist in the world recommends as solutions to the Paul Gallagher crisis? History: Anton Chaitkin Ibero-America: Dennis Small You’ll find LaRouche’s own elaborated answer in ourScience sec- Law: Edward Spannaus Russia and Eastern Europe: Rachel Douglas tion, the second in a three-part series on physical space-time. United States: Debra Freeman Here, by way of sharp contrast, I draw your attention to John May- INTERNATIONAL BUREAUS nard Keynes’ famous 1937 proposal, that the Treasury “fill old bottles Bogotá: Javier Almario Berlin: Rainer Apel with banknotes, bury them at suitable depths in disused coalmines Copenhagen: Tom Gillesberg which are then filled up to the surface with town rubbish, and leave it Houston: Harley Schlanger Lima: Sara Madueño to private enterprise on well-tried principles of laissez-faire to dig the Melbourne: Robert Barwick Mexico City: Rubén Cota Meza notes up again.” While it might “be more sensible to build houses and New Delhi: Ramtanu Maitra the like,” he concedes, “the above would be better than nothing.” Paris: Christine Bierre Stockholm: Hussein Askary That is the way some today are looking at the Obama Administra- United Nations, N.Y.C.: Leni Rubinstein Washington, D.C.: William Jones tion’s “stimulus package.” People are unemployed, so let’s put them Wiesbaden: Göran Haglund back to work—never mind at what! We can create jobs paving the ON THE WEB planet with solar collectors and windmills—isn’t that “better than e-mail: [email protected] www.larouchepub.com nothing”? www.larouchepub.com/eiw Webmaster: John Sigerson The answer, as LaRouche makes very clear, is “No!” The environ- Assistant Webmaster: George Hollis mentalist trends of the past 40 years, he writes, unless profoundly and Editor, Arabic-language edition: Hussein Askary quickly reversed, will doom the world to a new dark age, with a plunge in total population to 1 billion or less. Only a shift toward high energy EIR (ISSN 0273-6314) is published weekly (50 issues), by EIR News Service, Inc., 729 15th St. N.W., flux-density in production of power, can shift economies onto a growth Washington, D.C. 20005. (703) 777-9451 trajectory that will raise productivity and skill levels, fostering the European Headquarters: E.I.R. GmbH, Postfach development of science and technology. 1611, D-65006 Wiesbaden, Germany; Our Feature elaborates that concept: “The Astounding High Cost Bahnstrasse 9a, D-65205, Wiesbaden, Germany Tel: 49-611-73650 of ‘Free’ Energy.” Our team proves that nuclear energy is not only the Homepage: http://www.eirna.com e-mail: [email protected] one and only current solution to our global requirements for power, Director: Georg Neudekker but that 1) it is safe; 2) there is no such thing as the much-ballyhooed Montreal, Canada: 514-855-1699 “nuclear waste”; and 3) “green” sources of electricity such as solar Denmark: EIR - Danmark, Sankt Knuds Vej 11, power and wind are both incompetent and destructive. basement left, DK-1903 Frederiksberg, Denmark. These and other matters will be the subject of LaRouche’s next Tel.: +45 35 43 60 40, Fax: +45 35 43 87 57. e-mail: [email protected]. webcast, on Feb. 11, at 1:00 p.m. Eastern Time, at www.larouchepac. Mexico: EIR, Manual Ma. Contreras #100, com. We’ll have a full report next week. Despacho 8, Col. San Rafael, CP 06470, Mexico, DF. Tel.: 2453-2852, 2453-2853. Copyright: ©2009 EIR News Service. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission strictly prohibited. Canada Post Publication Sales Agreement #40683579 Postmaster: Send all address changes to EIR, P.O. Box 17390, Washington, D.C. 20041-0390. EI R Contents www.larouchepub.com Volume 36, Number 6, February 13, 2009 Science 18 The Meaning of Physical Time Cover Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr. This Week continues the discussion of physical time that he began in last week’s issue, with his article A Mississippi “Nations as Dynamical.” That sharecropper report, he writes, concluded with uses horse- a summary outline of the power to farm, economist’s working definition during the Great National Archives of physical time, as opposed to Depression. clock time. Now, still 4 The Astounding High Cost of ‘Free’ Energy responding to the same relevant The world-wide shortage of electricity cannot be question posted after his Jan. 22 rectified by wind or solar power, so those who webcast address, “I focus on some essential implications of advocate these “free” sources of power are the role of physical time as such. condemning the majority of the Earth’s human I compare physical time, as a population to backwardness. Solving the problem conception of a principle of requires examining the two most important physical space-time, with the concepts in evaluating a power source: energy related concept of physical density and energy flux density. The only rational space.” conclusion is that we must build 6,000 gigawatts of generating capacity, and only nuclear power will do the job. By Laurence Hecht. 11 Why Windmills Can’t Fly: The Non-Science of Wind Energy 14 The Myth of Nuclear ‘Waste’ EI RContents www.larouchepub.com Volume 36, Number 6, February 13, 2009 Economics National International 30 Like ‘Free Energy,’ 44 Pelosi, Frank Schemed 48 U.S. Must Embrace There Is No Such Thing To Bankrupt the United Truth About Gaza; as ‘Free Money’ States Break Sykes-Picot Even though the government Lyndon LaRouche has renewed Cycle can create unlimited amounts of his call for the ouster of Nancy A U.S. intervention into the money at essentially no cost, the Pelosi as Speaker of the House, Israel-Palestinian conflict has effects will be disastrous if that and charged that both Pelosi and to be based on justice and money is not spent to create Rep. Barney Frank, chairman of truth, a rejection of all attacks wealth. The best-known the House Financial Services on civilians, especially example is Weimar Germany Committee, collaborated with Israel’s “doctrine of during 1922-23, when Felix Rohatyn and George disproportionate force,” and, prodigious amounts of free Soros, to kill legislation most importantly, breaking money were printed, which LaRouche had advanced in free of the same Sykes-Picot produced no wealth, and left the 2007, which would have imperial game that created nation in ruins. protected the U.S. economy the conflict in the first place. from the crisis now hitting it. 32 The Fascists Versus 51 Britain’s LTTE: FDR, Then and Now 46 Sen. Richard Shelby Upended Tigers and The imperial bankers, heirs of Calls for New ‘Pecora Opium-Drugged Lions the people who joined with the Hearings’ The Sri Lankan Army fascists and opposed President captured the military capital Franklin D. Roosevelt in the of the Liberation Tigers of 1930s and ’40s, have launched 47 The Homeowners and Bank Protection Act of Tamil Eelam, in a significant a renewed campaign to blow to British operations in assassinate the character and 2007 the region. accomplishments of FDR. Their An updated version of Lyndon goal is to prevent the Obama LaRouche’s HBPA. Administration from taking up 55 Financier Oligarchy Roosevelt’s campaign for the Reacts with Media general welfare, and against the Campaign Against the “economic royalists.” Pope and FDR By Helga Zepp-LaRouche. 37 Do You Want To Stimulate the Economy? 59 In a Crisis Like This, Then Build New Nuclear Don’t Consult Power Plants Morons; Listen to Those Who Forecast It A speech by Helga Zepp- LaRouche to a conference of the Solidarity and Progress party in Paris on Jan.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Modernizing Financial Services: the Glass-Steagall Act Revisited
    MODERNIZING FINANCIAL SERVICES: THE GLASS-STEAGALL ACT REVISITED National Association of Federally-Insured Credit Unions NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FEDERALLY-INSURED CREDIT UNIONS | NAFCU.ORG | 1 INTRODUCTION: Since the financial crisis, the credit union industry has experienced significant consolidation in the financial marketplace while the largest banks have reaped record profits and grown in both size and scope. From 2008 to 2017, the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) chartered only 29 new federal credit unions while, during that same period, 2,528 credit unions closed or merged out of existence. The post-crisis regulatory environment has contributed to this decade-long trend of consolidation, but credit unions have also faced barriers to growth in the form of field of membership rules, capital requirements, and limits on interest rates, among many other restrictions. Accordingly, while it is essential to promote regulatory relief that reduces compliance burdens, credit unions also need modern rules to evolve and grow. Regulatory burden and the pressure to consolidate affects more than just the credit union industry. Community banks have experienced similar declines.1 The lack of new charters among community institutions illustrates the extent to which complex and poorly tailored regulations have put a stranglehold on growth and, by extension, limited consumer financial services. In recognition of these trends and the need for regulatory relief, Congress recently passed the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (S. 2155). S. 2155 garnered bipartisan support and helped alleviate some burdens associated with reporting under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act and the NCUA’s member business lending rules, and provided new safe harbors for compliance with federal consumer financial protection laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Intelligence Review, Volume 36, Number 30, August 7, 2009
    Executive Intelligence Review EIRAugust 7, 2009 Vol. 36 No. 30 www.larouchepub.com $10.00 Reality of Collapse Destroys Fantasy of Recovery The Incredible Shrinking Obama Presidency ‘China Youth Daily’ Circulates LaRouche’s Proposals LaRouche Webcast: The Fall Of the House of Windsor SUBSCRIBE TO EIR ONLINE The Banking System Has Already Collapsed! “There is no possibility of a non-collapse of the present financial system—none! It's finished, now!” —Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr., webcast, July 25, 2007 Unless the Homeowners and Bank Protection Act “is enacted as a first order of business of the 110th Congress in September [2007], many millions of Americans will be evicted from their homes.... The foreclosure tsunami is occurring, not as a result of a mere housing or mortgage crisis, but a disintegration of the entire global financial system.” —EIR Editorial, Aug. 31, 2007 “My view of the economy is that the fundamentals are strong.” —President George W. Bush, Dec. 20, 2007 EIR Online’s Subscribers Know What Is Really Going On.... Do You? To subscribe: www.larouchepub.com/eiw Call 1-800-278-3135 (toll-free) See back cover for subscription rates Founder and Contributing Editor: Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr. Editorial Board: Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr., Antony Papert, Gerald Rose, Dennis Small, Edward Spannaus, Nancy Spannaus, Jeffrey Steinberg, EI R William Wertz Editor: Nancy Spannaus Managing Editors: Bonnie James, Susan Welsh Science Editor: Marjorie Mazel Hecht Technology Editor: Marsha Freeman From the Managing Editor Book Editor: Katherine Notley Graphics Editor: Alan Yue Photo Editor: Stuart Lewis Circulation Manager: Stanley Ezrol “ INTELLIGENCE DIRECTORS f I were President, I’d end this thing right now!” Lyndon LaRouche Counterintelligence: Jeffrey Steinberg, Michele I Steinberg declared at his Aug.
    [Show full text]
  • Leading Articles & Commentary On
    Leading Articles & Commentary on the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission Compiled by the Robert Crown Law Library April 2011 Source Link Excerpt Derivatives, As Accused by Buffett http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/03/14/derivative By Andrew Ross Sorkin s-as-accused-by-buffett/ New York Times March 14, 2011 The Official Verdict: America’s FCIC http://www.economist.com/node/18060818?story_i “The report of the Financial Crisis Inquiry Report is Big, Surprisingly Readable d=18060818 Commission (FCIC), America’s official and a Disappointment probe, gets things slightly the wrong way Economist round. It is breezily written, despite its Mar. 3, 2011 bulk. “The fault lies not in the stars, but in us” is its way of underlining that the crisis was avoidable.” In Case You Didn’t Get the http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/in-case- Memo...The Real Causes of the So- you-didnt-get-the-memo--- Called Financial Crisis /2011/02/19/ABMMfvH_story.html By Michael Lewis Washington Post February 20, 2011 1 A Political Divide Over the Inquiry of http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/17/business/17cri “The government inquiry into the causes the Financial Crisis sis.html of the 2008 financial crisis was the focus By Sewell Chan of intense partisan bickering on New York Times Wednesday at a House hearing. February 17, 2011 Republicans called the final 545-page report a political exercise whose findings were mostly inevitable, while Democrats defended its main conclusion: that Wall Street risk-taking and regulatory negligence combined to produce an avoidable disaster.” Social Forces, More than Bad Actors, http://www.americanbanker.com/bankthink/- Led to Crisis 1032740-1.html By Gregory D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Glass–Steagall Act: Unraveling the Myth Norbert J
    BACKGROUNDER No. 3104 | APRIL 28, 2016 The Glass–Steagall Act: Unraveling the Myth Norbert J. Michel, PhD Abstract The 1933 Glass–Steagall Act is widely acclaimed for ending abusive and Key Points risky financial practices that led to the Great Depression, but it has a much better reputation than it deserves. The foundation of its supposed n The Glass–Steagall Act, the 1933 success is the Act’s vaunted separation of commercial and investment law that separated commercial banking. In truth, however, this separation was never absolute. The law and investment banking, gained a much better reputation than it implemented general prohibitions on certain activities, but included ever deserved. exceptions in every case. That is, the Act did not implement a complete n separation of commercial and investment banking. Furthermore, there There is virtually no evidence that allowing banks to engage in is virtually no evidence that the combination of commercial and invest- securities activities during the ment banking threatened bank safety in the pre-Glass–Steagall era. In pre-Glass–Steagall era worsened most cases the evidence supports the opposite conclusion, that the com- their financial condition relative to bination actually strengthened banks. In virtually all cases of supposed- those engaged in strictly commer- ly abusive and unsound practices during the pre-Glass–Steagall era, the cial bank activities. evidence cited either refers to a secondary source, is nonexistent, or is ir- n Allowing banks to engage in both relevant because Glass–Steagall did not address the practice specifically. types of financial activities actu- ally strengthened these commer- he 1933 Glass–Steagall Act is still admired by many who believe cial banks relative to their special- Tits separation of commercial and investment banking banned ized peers.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission
    FinancialCrisisInquiryCommission Background: ThisMayCongresspassedandPresidentObamasignedtheFraudEnforcementandRecovery Actof2009(FERA).Amongotherthings,theActestablishedaFinancialCrisisInquiry Commission(FCIC)andchargeditwith“examin[ing]thecauses,domesticandglobal,ofthe currentfinancialandeconomiccrisisintheUnitedStates.”ThelawinstructstheCommissionto investigatetheroleof22specifiedfactorsinprecipitatingthecrisisandlookintothecollapseof eachmajorfinancialfirmthatfailedorwouldhavefailedwithoutextraordinarygovernment assistancebetweenAugust2007andApril2009.TheCommissionreceivedbroadsubpoena power,anopen-endedmandatetogatherinformationfromgovernmentagenciesandprivate entitiesandtheauthoritytorefercasesforfederalorstateprosecution.(seeAttachmentA) TheCommissionconsistsofsixmembersappointedbyDemocraticcongressionalleadersand fourmembersappointedbytheirRepublicancounterparts.(AttachmentB)FormerCalifornia statetreasurerPhilAngelidesservesaschairmanoftheFCIC(AttachmentC);formerHouse WaysandMeansCommitteechairmanBillThomas(R-CA)wasnamedvicechairman.The CommissionwillholditsfirstpublicmeetingonSeptember17andisrequiredunderFERAto reportitsfindingsinDecember2010. TheCommission’sOpportunities: • Deepenandsustainthedemandforreformbyshapingpublicunderstandingofthedoctrines, policiesandpracticesthatledtothecollapse • Buildafoundationalrecordforsubsequenthistoricalaccountsoftheeventsunder investigation • Advancetheprocessofbringingindividualandinstitutionalwrongdoerstojustice • Indicatethescopeandkeycharacteristicsofreformsneededtorestorestability,accountability
    [Show full text]
  • New Deal & Economy
    New Deal & Economy New Deal & Economy • Banks & Credit • Federal Spending • Money • Taxation • Industry • Stock Market New Deal and the Banks Bank Crisis • 1931-32 • 2,000 banks failed • Assets - $1.7 billion • March 1933 – 38 states closed banks – NY Stock Exchange closed – Chicago Board of Trade closed Banking • Five day bank holiday • Emergency Banking Act (March ‘33) – Drafted by Hoover’s Treasury Dept – Assistance to private bankers • Federal Deposit Insurance Corp – June 1933 – Accepted by FDR Emergency Banking Act of 1933 • Authorized RFC to – Evaluate banks • Sound banks to reopen • Unsound banks closed – Buy bank stock • Authorized Federal Reserve bank notes Reconstruction Finance Corp. • Hoover: – Voluntary bankers’ pools • RFC: next step • Loans to insolvent banks • $2 billion thru 1932 Glass-Steagall Act of 1933 • Enacted - June 1933 • Separate commercial & investment banking • Established FDIC Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. • Opposed by FDR & Eastern banks • Supported by John Nance Garner & Jesse Jones • Based on Texas program • Original limit: $2,500 • Banks to sell preferred stock to RFC Banking Act of 1935 • Federal Reserve control of monetary policy • Greater govt control of Federal Reserve Jesse Jones • Born Tenn. 1874 • Lumber & banking • Houston Ship Canal QuickTime™ and a • Wilson Dem. decompressor are needed to see this picture. • Anti-Wall Street • Dem Fin. Dir. 24-28 RFC under FDR • “Government Bank” • Loans to – Railroads • Management oversight • Limits on salaries – NYC & Chicago – Bonneville Power Authority RFC Subsidiaries • Export-Import Bank • Federal National Mortgage Association • Electric Home and Farm Authority • Commodity Credit Corporation RFC Controversy • High interest rates – Not compete with private banks • Careful lending • Insufficient? • Private banks & corporations too timid? • More expansion needed? Banks & Credit • Rescued banking system • Expanded credit • Enough? New Deal and Federal Spending FDR & Federal Budget • Believed in balanced budgets • Willing to incur temporary deficit for relief • Unimpressed by J.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Vote Wide Inquiry on Short Selling
    DON’T BLAME THE SHORTS This page intentionally left blank DON’T BLAME THE SHORTS WHY SHORT SELLERS ARE ALWAYS BLAMED FOR MARKET CRASHES AND HOW HISTORY IS REPEATING ITSELF ROBERT SLOAN New York Chicago San Francisco Lisbon London Madrid Mexico City Milan New Delhi San Juan Seoul Singapore Sydney Toronto Copyright © 2010 by Robert Sloan. All rights reserved. Except as permitted under the United States Copyright Act of 1976, no part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of the publisher. ISBN: 978-0-07-163687-2 MHID: 0-07-163687-0 The material in this eBook also appears in the print version of this title: ISBN: 978-0-07-163686-5, MHID: 0-07-163686-2. All trademarks are trademarks of their respective owners. Rather than put a trademark symbol after every occur- rence of a trademarked name, we use names in an editorial fashion only, and to the benefit of the trademark owner, with no intention of infringement of the trademark. Where such designations appear in this book, they have been printed with initial caps. McGraw-Hill eBooks are available at special quantity discounts to use as premiums and sales promotions, or for use in corporate training programs. To contact a representative please e-mail us at [email protected]. Articles reprinted from The New York Times, March 4, April 9, 11, and 21 © 1932 The New York Times. All rights reserved. Used by permission and protected by the Copyright Laws of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • In Search of the Banking Regulator Amid U.S. Financial Reforms of the 1930S Dominique Lacoue-Labarthe
    In Search of the Banking Regulator amid U.S. Financial Reforms of the 1930s Dominique Lacoue-Labarthe To cite this version: Dominique Lacoue-Labarthe. In Search of the Banking Regulator amid U.S. Financial Reforms of the 1930s. 2014. hal-00937533v1 HAL Id: hal-00937533 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00937533v1 Preprint submitted on 28 Jan 2014 (v1), last revised 16 Dec 2014 (v2) HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. In Search of the Banking Regulator amid U.S. Financial Reforms of the 1930s Dominique Lacoue-Labarthe LAREFI Working Paper N° 201 4-01 2014 http: //lare -efi.u -bordeaux4.fr LAREFI Université de-Bordeaux Bâtiment Recherche Economie – 1er étage Avenue Léon Duguit – 33 608 Pessac i LAREFI – LABORATOIRE D ’ANALYSE ET DE RECHERCHE EN ECONOMIE ET FINANCES INTERNATIONALES AUTHORS Dominique Lacoue-Labarthe, LAREFI, Université Montesquieu Bordeaux IV NOTICES LAREFI Working Papers contain preliminary material and research results. They have been peer reviewed. They are circulated in order to stimulate discussion and critical comment; any opinions expressed are only those of the author(s). Copyright LAREFI. All rights reserved. Sections of this material may be reproduced for personal and not-for-profit use without the express written permission of but with acknowledgment to LAREFI.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Regulatory Reform After the Crisis: an Assessment
    Financial regulatory reform after the crisis: an assessment By Darrell Duffie1 Executive Summary “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste.” – Rahm Emanuel, November 2008. This report offers a brief assessment of the post-crisis regulatory reform of the financial system: the most sweeping re-regulation of banking and financial markets since the US “New Deal” reforms2 conducted during the Great Depression. In the 21st century, finance permeates the global economy more deeply and intricately than ever before. The financial crisis of 2007-09 revealed powerful new variations of the notion of a “bank run”. As with the US reforms of the 1930s, governments have been energized by the heavy economic fallout of the crisis, especially given the revelations of socially excessive risk-taking and self-interested misbehavior. Commenters seethed over bailouts of wide swaths of the financial system, including banks, broker-dealers, a huge insurance firm, government- affiliated mortgage agencies, and money-market mutual funds. Staggering social costs were evident in lost output and employment. For example, within five quarters of the end of 2007, the real gross domestic product of the United States and the euro area each fell by about 4%, and were even further below their normal growth paths.3 The impact on Japan was even more severe. The euro area was then battered by a second wave of crisis arising from the exposure of its already weakened banking system to shaky sovereign debt and from worries over the future path of the eurozone. Legislatures and finance ministers around the world empowered financial regulators to rehabilitate on a grand scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Why a New 'Pecora Commission' Is Urgently Needed
    Click here for Full Issue of EIR Volume 36, Number 10, March 13, 2009 EIR Conference Report JACQUES CHEMINADE Why a New ‘Pecora Commission’ Is Urgently Needed The Schiller Institute, founded by Helga Zepp- the tax code, so that Morgan and his like would never LaRouche, held an international conference in Rüs- pay taxes. Al Capone would never have gone to prison, selsheim, Germany, Feb. 21-22, with the title, “Re- had he known “Andy” Mellon better. Pecora then building the World Economy after the Systemic Crisis.” showed that the total taxes paid by the entire House of Keynoted by Lyndon LaRouche and Helga Zepp- Morgan, not only J.P. Morgan, but the entire House of LaRouche, whose speeches we published last week, the Morgan, and its partners, in the previous five years, was conference was attended by about 350 people from 25 a single payment of $5,000 in 1931. nations. We continue here with presentations by some of Then came the list of J.P. Morgan’s and his associ- the other speakers. ates’ properties. They controlled most of the American Jacques Cheminade, president of France’s Solidar- economy, with their British friends. And then came J.P. ity and Progress party (Solidarité et Progrès) addressed Morgan’s preferred list, by which a bank’s influential the conference on Feb. 22. The panel was entitled, “Is friends, including former President Calvin Coolidge, Mankind Capable of Governing Himself?” participated in stock offerings at steeply discounted rates. Their full control of the American economy was Good morning. then exposed. The scene is in the United States hearings.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Notable Senate Investigations: the Pecora Committee
    A History of Notable Senate Investigations prepared by the United States Senate Historical Office Citation: "Subcommittee on Senate Resolutions 84 and 239 (The Pecora Committee), Notable Senate Investigations, U.S. Senate Historical Office, Washington, D.C.” Subcommittee on Senate Resolutions 84 and 239 (The Pecora Committee) Resolution passed: March 2, 1932 Report issued: June 16, 1934 Chairman: Peter Norbeck (R-SD), 1932-1933; Duncan Fletcher (D-FL), 1933-1934 Vice Chairman: Duncan Fletcher, 1932-1933; Peter Norbeck, 1933-1934 Committee members: John Blaine (R-WI) Edward Costigan (D-CO) James Couzens (R-MI) Carter Glass (D-VA) John Townsend (R-DE) Origins Beginning in September 1929, the “Roaring Twenties” came to an agonizing halt as stock prices on Wall Street plunged. On October 24, tagged Black Thursday, a selling frenzy resulted in one-day losses that totaled $9 billion. The following Tuesday, October 29, the market traded 16 million shares—a record that would stand for 39 years. By November the market had shed some $26 billion in value. The market crash in 1929 led to the Great Depression, the longest economic downturn in American history. By 1932 nearly one-quarter of all Americans were unemployed. The financial crisis closed thousands of banks across the country. As depositors panicked, “bank runs” became a common sight on American main streets. To strengthen the financial sector and bolster sagging markets, President Herbert Hoover called on banks to enforce their internal regulations. Amid rumors that “bear raiders” were undermining his efforts, Hoover asked senators to investigate stock market practices. Process On March 2, 1932, senators passed Senate Resolution 84 authorizing the Committee on Banking and Currency to investigate “practices with respect to the buying and selling and the borrowing and lending” of stocks and securities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Permanence of Quasi-Legislative Independent Commissions
    The Rise and Permanence of Quasi-Legislative Independent Commissions By: Steven R. Ross,* Raphael A. Prober,** and Gabriel K. Gillett*** Disclaimer ABSTRACT This article explores Congress’s recent trend of creating quasi-legislative independent commissions to augment its own investigations, and determines what factors may enhance the chance that a commission will prove successful. Although Congress has never been the lone forum for investigations, since 2001 the legislature has been empanelling entities of outside experts to investigate the most significant economic and national security issues. This Article begins with a history of governmental investigations in America, highlighting activity by Congress, independent agencies, and presidential commissions. Next, it describes the modern political, communications, and scheduling strains on Congress that have created an opportunity for new types of investigations, and offers case studies of three quasi-legislative independent commissions – the Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, the Commission on Wartime Contracting in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission. Then, this Article scrutinizes these case studies and concludes that a quasi-legislative independent commission is most likely to be successful where it has a limited scope and investigative flexibility, features members seen as free from political pressures, uses discretion in compelling information, and ties its mission to larger legislative reform. Finally, this Article concludes by
    [Show full text]