OHAAKI a POWER STATION on MAORI LAND Evelyn Stokes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

OHAAKI a POWER STATION on MAORI LAND Evelyn Stokes OHAAKI A POWER STATION ON MAORI LAND Evelyn Stokes Te Matahauariki Institute University of Waikato 2003 ii List of Contents 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................1 2. Geothermal Exploration 1966-76 ................................................................4 3. The Environmental Impact Report 1977 ....................................................13 4. The Environmental Impact Audit 1978 .....................................................17 5. MWD Attempts to Purchase the Land .......................................................23 6. The Ministerial Requirement for a Designation ........................................41 7. Appointment of the Ngati Tahu Tribal Trust 1980 ....................................57 8. Negotiations Toward a Lease 1981-82 ......................................................69 9. The Ohaaki Liaison Committee .................................................................85 10. Marae Development and the ‘Amenity Grant’ ..........................................97 11. The Ngawha .............................................................................................113 12. Geothermal Policy Development 1980s ..................................................129 13. The Resource Management Act 1991 ......................................................141 14. Retrospect ................................................................................................155 15. References ................................................................................................160 16. Appendices: 1. A Note on the Name Ohaaki ..........................................163 2. Submission to the Commission for the Environment ....164 3. Statement at Hearing of Objections to Ministerial Requirement ...................................................................172 iii iv List of Figures 1. Taupo Volcanic Zone ...................................................................................4 2. Proposed Ohaaki Geothermal Power Project 1978 ......................................7 3. Drilling a Geothermal Well .........................................................................9 4. Proposed Ohaaki Power Station .................................................................24 5. Land to be Designated ...............................................................................25 6. Ngati Tahu Lands .......................................................................................56 7. Te Ohaaki Papakainga c.1930 ....................................................................58 8. Tahorakuri A1 Blocks Land Tenure 1980 .................................................61 9. Flow Diagram of Ohaaki Power Station ....................................................86 10. Comparative Height of Ohaaki Cooling Tower .........................................89 11. Te Ohaaki Papakainga 1983 ....................................................................100 12. Geothermal Features at Ohaaki ................................................................115 Acknowledgements My thanks and appreciation go to Lois MacMillan, University Secretarial Services, who typed the text, and Max Oulton, Department of Geography, University of Waikato, who prepared the maps and photographs. Acknowledgment is also due to Electricorp for the photographs on pp. 84, 128, 152, 153 and 154 of the opening of the dining hall at Te Ohaaki Marae and the Ohaaki power station by the Governor General, Sir Paul Reeves on 31 October 1989. All other photographs were taken by Evelyn Stokes. v Tahumatua, the ancestral meeting house of Ngati Tahu at Te Ohaaki Marae vi 1. Introduction This paper is about a geothermal power station called Ohaaki (see Appendix 1), constructed over the period 1982-1989 on Maori land close by Te Ohaaki Marae and the ancestral papakainga of Ngati Tahu. This is a personal account of the impact of this project on Ngati Tahu rather than a history of the construction of the power station. My initial involvement began early in 1977 when I was asked by the Power Development Division of the New Zealand Electricity Department (NZED) to comment on likely social and economic impacts of the proposed geothermal power station in their preparation of an Environmental Impact Report. In 1980 I was appointed by the Maori Land Court as one of the trustees of Te Ohaaki Marae and the lands affected by the power project. I held this position until I resigned in 1992. I was, therefore, party to all the negotiations with Crown representatives over the Maori lands involved and the development of Te Ohaaki Marae. How I became so involved with the Ngati Tahu community is part of the story that will unfold in the following pages. In 1977 I was an outsider, with no ancestral ties or other connections with Ngati Tahu. I knew little about this community then but I was interested in the social and economic impact of large development projects. At the University of Waikato where I was employed in the Geography Department I was already working with colleagues Robert Mahuta, John Rangihau and Jim Ritchie on the impacts of the Huntly Power Station and contributing to the Huntly Monitoring Project, based at the university. During a period of study leave in North America in 1976 I met and talked with a range of people involved in impact assessment from Alaska to Ontario to Arizona, an experience which broadened my perspectives. My time in Fairbanks, Alaska was particularly illuminating (Stokes 1976). I had also reported on impacts at Huntly (Stokes 1977 and 1978). I was also developing a number of local contacts in this new field of environmental impact assessment which was now being applied to public works in New Zealand. The 1970s was a time of developing awareness and policy-making in the area of resource management in New Zealand. It was also a time of developing awareness of Maori land issues too. This was a significant part of the developing scenario at Ohaaki in the late 1970s. My own position is perhaps best spelled out in one letter, from correspondence I had with the Commissioner for the Environment, W. D. Wendelken, in mid 1977: One of the issues involving environmental impact and decision-making which I am particularly concerned about is the conflict of “national interest” versus the welfare of local communities on whom a major project is imposed. While in Canada I talked to several people about the proposed Mackenzie Valley Pipeline. Some of the Fairbanks people I met had given evidence to the enquiry conducted by Mr Justice Berger last year. I have now just received a copy of the Berger Commission Report. It is a very impressive document, not just in terms of format, high standard of illustrations and quality of writing. It also contains the best statement I have seen on this problem of “national interest” expressed by the dominant European urban industrial culture, weighed against the potential destruction of viable indigenous cultures and economies. There was considerable concern on this issue in Alaska and I feel we have a parallel situation in New Zealand. For example, the pressure to preserve indigenous forests is largely an urban middle class environmental awareness thing, and few of these people really understand the implications for local people of tying up large areas in National Parks or other preservation systems. This has affected Tuhoe people in the Urewera; the Nga Manawa Incorporation in the Kaimai-Mamaku area 1 have had to put up with a great deal of pressure from environmentalists because these Maori groups are trying to get some income from their lands by planting pine trees. In the past they have also been castigated for leaving their lands idle and unproductive. They can’t win, but I think there are a lot of South Island Pakeha West Coast people whose livelihood depends on timber milling who would understand their attitudes. I have had arguments with my ecology-minded university colleagues on this. But my attitude is based on childhood experience; my uncles were timber millers in the Kaimai, and many of my school holidays were spent at the Whakamarama mill settlement (it disappeared when the mill closed in 1946). It was from the mill people that we learned to appreciate, understand and respect the bush. But it was also a means of livelihood for these people, Maori and Pakeha, and they also understood the need for long-term conservation and management of slow- growing indigenous trees. I might also add that most of the Kaimai-Mamaku has been milled at least once since the 1880s. I also think that far more destruction has been perpetrated by feral goats in the Kaimai in the last 20 years than by mill people in the last 80-90 years. I also believe pine trees are here to stay, for they regenerate themselves without being planted by people, and we need their timber. I enclose a copy of a paper I have done on the Maori Community at Waahi Marae [see Stokes 1977] in which I have tried to suggest some of the social and economic impacts of the Huntly Power Station, and put them in historical and cultural context. This is a good example of locating a power station with no regard whatsoever for existing community patterns, and no real attempt to talk to the local people and listen to their grievances. After four years of construction some senior NZED men came to the marae for the first time when Duncan McIntyre [Minister of Maori Affairs] visited earlier this year to receive submissions from the local people. Now
Recommended publications
  • Ngongotaha News July 2014
    NGONGOTAHA NEWS The Sunny side of the Mountain - FLUORIDE FREE NGONGOTAHA Editor Ann Henderson - Phone 3574 651 email: [email protected] website: www.ngongotahanews.co.nz This is what happens, the kids take the car keys off you. NEXT DEADLINE Friday 25th July 2014 11am July 2014 issue Photo courtesy of Rotorua Daily Post THE UNWANTED “URINAL” OOPS SORRY BOLT I was phoned recently by the Editor of the Daily Post asking my opinion on the so called “Bolt” being re-erected in Ngongotaha, I thought this guy had lost his marbles, who in their right mind would want to place a monstrosity like this in our beautiful village. Well I was wrong, apparently Progress Ngongotaha think it would be a good idea. Well after my scathing comments in the daily post being made public, I have received so many emails and comments, reinforcing my opinion. Why! Why! oh Why! would we want this when Rotorua didn’t. It used to take pride of place in the City Focus. But fear not people, I have found an owner, he doesnt know it yet. Let me quote from an article written by Kevin Page in the Daily Post Friday June 20th. “The Rotorua Area Electricity Authority was giving us a pressie to commemorate, er something so memorable I forget what it was. Before we knew what was happening it was unwrapped and in place. Smack bang in the middle of town, and we hated it. Except me” I went on to read that Kevin liked it so much that he tried taking it home to put on his front lawn after a “night out” I suppose it could look attractive after a night out on the ‘turps’ Well Kevin YOU CAN HAVE IT.
    [Show full text]
  • FT1 Taupo Volcano
    Geological Society of New Zealand New Zealand Geophysical Society 26th New Zealand Geothermal Workshop 6th - 9th December 2004 Great Lake Centre Taupo Field Trip Guides Organising Committee Vern Manville (Convenor) Diane Tilyard (Administration and right-hand) Paul White, Chris Bromley, Shane Cronin, Ian Smith, Stuart Simmons (Science Programme) Brent Alloway (Sponsorship) Geoff Kilgour, Tamara Tait (Social Programme) Brad Scott, Mike Rosenberg, Peter Kamp, Adam Vonk, Cam Nelson, Jim Cole, Graham Leonard, Karl Spinks and Greg Browne (Field trip leaders) Nick Mortimer (Web master) And Student helpers and off-siders and Members of the Geological Society and Geophysical Society Committees Geological Society of New Zealand Miscellaneous Publication 117B ISBN 0-908678-99-1 Field Trip Guides – Contents Field Trip 1 Taupo Volcano 1-10 Mike Rosenberg & Geoff Kilgour Field Trip 2 Geothermal systems 13-40 Stuart F. Simmons, Patrick R.L. Browne & Bradley J. Scott Field Trip 5 Stratigraphic Architecture and 43-86 Sedimentology of King Country and Eastern Taranaki Basins Peter J.J. Kamp, Adam J. Vonk, & Campbell S. Nelson Field Trip 6 The Miocene-Pliocene interior seaway of the 89-109 central North Island: sedimentary patterns and tectonic styles in the Kuripapango Strait Greg H. Browne Field Trip 7 Caldera Volcanism in the Taupo 111-135 Volcanic Zone Karl D. Spinks, J.W. Cole, & G.S. Leonard Field Trip 1 Taupo Volcano Michael Rosenberg and Geoff Kilgour Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences, Wairakei Research Centre, Private Bag 2000, Taupo
    [Show full text]
  • THE ECOLOGICAL REQUIREMENTS of the NEW ZEALAND FALCON (Falco Novaeseelandiae) in PLANTATION FORESTRY
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. THE ECOLOGICAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE NEW ZEALAND FALCON (Falco novaeseelandiae) IN PLANTATION FORESTRY A thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Zoology at Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand Richard Seaton 2007 Adult female New Zealand falcon. D. Stewart 2003. “The hawks, eagles and falcons have been an inspiration to people of all races and creeds since the dawn of civilisation. We cannot afford to lose any species of the birds of prey without an effort commensurate with the inspiration of courage, integrity and nobility that they have given humanity…If we fail on this point, we fail in the basic philosophy of feeling a part of our universe and all that goes with it.” Morley Nelson, 2002. iii iv ABSTRACT Commercial pine plantations made up of exotic tree species are increasingly recognised as habitats that can contribute significantly to the conservation of indigenous biodiversity in New Zealand. Encouraging this biodiversity by employing sympathetic forestry management techniques not only offers benefits for indigenous flora and fauna but can also be economically advantageous for the forestry industry. The New Zealand falcon (Falco novaeseelandiae) or Karearea, is a threatened species, endemic to the islands of New Zealand, that has recently been discovered breeding in pine plantations. This research determines the ecological requirements of New Zealand falcons in this habitat, enabling recommendations for sympathetic forestry management to be made.
    [Show full text]
  • Ages on Weathered Plio-Pleistocene Tephra Sequences, Western North Island, New Zealand
    riwtioll: Lowe. D. ~.; TiP.I>CU. J. M.: Kamp. P. J. J.; Liddell, I. J.; Briggs, R. M.: Horrocks, 1. L. 2001. Ages 011 weathered Pho-~Je.stocene tephra sequences, western North Island. New Zealand. Ill: Juviglle. E.T.: Raina!. J·P. (Eds). '"Tephras: Chronology, Archaeology', CDERAD editeur, GoudeL us Dossiers de f'ArcMo-Logis I: 45-60. Ages on weathered Plio-Pleistocene tephra sequences, western North Island, New Zealand Ages de sequences de tephras Plio-Pleistocenes alteres, fie du Nord-Ouest, Nouvelle lelande David J. Lowe·, J, Mark Tippett!, Peter J. J, Kamp·, Ivan J. LiddeD·, Roger M. Briggs· & Joanna L. Horrocks· Abstract: using the zircon fISsion-track method, we have obtainedfive ages 011 members oftwo strongly-...-eathered. silicic, Pliocene·Pleislocelle tephra seql/ences, Ihe KOIIIUQ and Hamilton Ashformalions, in weslern North !sland, New Zealand. These are Ihe jirst numerical ages 10 be oblained directly on these deposils. Ofthe Kauroa Ash sequence, member KI (basal unit) was dated at 2,24 ± 0.19 Ma, confirming a previous age ofc. 1.25 Ma obtained (via tephrochronology)from KlAr ages on associatedbasalt lava. Members K1 and X3 gave indistinguishable ages between 1,68.±0,/1 and 1.43 ± 0./7 Ma. Member K11, a correlQlilV! ojOparau Tephra andprobably also Ongatiti Ignimbrite. was dated at 1.18:i: 0.11 Ma, consistent with an age of 1.23 ± 0.02 Ma obtained by various methodr on Ongaiiti Ignimbrite. Palaeomagnetic measurements indicated that members XI3 to XIJ (top unit, Waiterimu Ash) are aged between c. 1.2 Ma and O. 78 Mo. Possible sources of/he Kauroa Ash Formation include younger \!Oleanic centres in the sOllthern Coromandel Volcanic Zone orolder volcanic cenlres in the Taupo Volcanic Zone, or both.
    [Show full text]
  • Soils of the Bay of Plenty Volume 2 Central Bay of Plenty
    Soils of the Bay of Plenty Volume 2 Central Bay of Plenty Environment Bay of Plenty Environmental Publication 2010/11-2 5 Quay Street P O Box 364 Whakatane NEW ZEALAND ISSN: 1175 9372 Working with our communities for a better environment E mahi ngatahi e pai ake ai te taiao Soils of the Bay of Plenty Volume 2: Central Bay of Plenty Environmental Publication 2010/11-2 ISSN: 1175 9372 June 2010 Environment Bay of Plenty 5 Quay Street PO Box 364 Whakatane 3158 NEW ZEALAND Prepared by W. C. Rijkse and D. F. Guinto Preface Soil is a resource, a living, breathing entity that, if treated properly, will maintain itself. It’s our lifeline for survival. When it has finally been depleted, the human population will disappear. Project your imagination into the soil below you next time you go into the garden. Think with compassion of the life that exists there. Think, the drama, the harvesting, and the work that carries on ceaselessly. Think about the meaning of being a steward for the earth. Marjorie Harris, In the Garden (1995) For as long as I can remember I have been intrigued and fascinated by landscapes and soils of New Zealand, in particular of the Bay of Plenty where I spent a good deal of my career mapping soils. A landscape to me is a puzzle, a closed book, and to be able to open that book, to solve the puzzle by finding out what soils are in the landscape and what are the possibilities for good land use, is a joy we scientists call pedology – the science of soils.
    [Show full text]
  • Geothermal Project Reports List.Xlsx
    Geothermal Project Reports List.xlsx Geothermal Project Reports List Call Number Title Author 1979.01 Corrosion testing in geothermal systems ABDURRAHMAN, M. 1979.03 Evaluation of the North Davao geothermal prospect, Mindanao, Southern Philippines AREVALO, E. 1979.04 Geothermal pilot plant studies in Broadlands BASYARI, A. 1979.05 Two-phase geothermal fluid transmission application to El Tatio Geothermal Field, Chile BENABARRE, J. 1979.06 Geochemistry of hydrothermal alteration of the Ohaki Rhyolite, Broadlands Geothermal Field, New Zealand BOGIE, I. 1979.07 Gravity anomalies over the Ngawha Geothermal Field, Northland, New Zealand CORDON, U. 1979.08 Economic analysis of geothermal plant DANU, H. 1979.09 Preliminary study of the binary cycle with reference to its application to the geothermal resources in India RAO, D.H. 1979.10 Mapping and chemical survey of surface distance features, Ngawha Geothermal Field, Northland, New TESFAGIORGIS, P. Zealand 1979.12 Geothermal well design - prediction of flow and heat transfer KANGUA, J.F. 1979.15 Non-electrical uses of geothermal energy - downhole heat exchanger design LEE, K. 1979.16 Mapping of vents associated with Putahi Rhyolite, Northland, N.Z. LETELIER, M. 1979.17 Setting of the geothermal fields of Tibet and a discussion of associated heat source problems LIAO, Z. 1979.19 The potential of the Manito geothermal system, South-Eastern Luzon, Philippines OBUSAN, R. 1979.20 A literature survey of geopressured systems PENG, D-J. 1979.21 Build-up test analysis of Ngawha and Kamojang wells PRATOMO, H. 1979.22 Thermodynamics of geothermal plant - optimisation studies TARIGAN, G. 1979.23 More efficient use of geothermal heat at Broadlands Lucerne Company's drying plant VAN DE WYDEVEN, F.
    [Show full text]
  • Geothermal Power Development in New Zealand - Lessons for Japan
    Geothermal Power Development in New Zealand - Lessons for Japan - Research Report Emi Mizuno, Ph.D. Senior Researcher Japan Renewable Energy Foundation February 2013 Geothermal Power Development in New Zealand – Lessons for Japan 2-18-3 Higashi-shimbashi Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 105-0021 Phone: +81-3-6895-1020, FAX: +81-3-6895-1021 http://jref.or.jp An opinion shown in this report is an opinion of the person in charge and is not necessarily agreeing with the opinion of the Japan Renewable Energy Foundation. Copyright ©2013 Japan Renewable Energy Foundation.All rights reserved. The copyright of this report belongs to the Japan Renewable Energy Foundation. An unauthorized duplication, reproduction, and diversion are prohibited in any purpose regardless of electronic or mechanical method. 1 Copyright ©2013 Japan Renewable Energy Foundation.All rights reserved. Geothermal Power Development in New Zealand – Lessons for Japan Table of Contents Acknowledgements 4 Executive Summary 5 1. Introduction 8 2. Geothermal Resources and Geothermal Power Development in New Zealand 9 1) Geothermal Resources in New Zealand 9 2) Geothermal Power Generation in New Zealand 11 3) Section Summary 12 3. Policy and Institutional Framework for Geothermal Development in New Zealand 13 1) National Framework for Geothermal Power Development 13 2) Regional Framework and Process 15 3) New National Resource Consent Framework and Process for Proposals of National Significance 18 4) Section Summary 21 4. Environmental Problems and Policy Approaches 22 1) Historical Environmental Issues in the Taupo Volcanic Zone 22 2) Policy Changes, Current Environmental and Management Issues, and Policy Approaches 23 3) Section Summary 32 5.
    [Show full text]
  • GNS Science Consultancy Report 2013/155
    DISCLAIMER This report has been prepared by the Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Limited (GNS Science) exclusively for and under contract to Bay of Plenty Regional Council. Unless otherwise agreed in writing by GNS Science, GNS Science accepts no responsibility for any use of, or reliance on any contents of this Report by any person other than Bay of Plenty Regional Council and shall not be liable to any person other than Bay of Plenty Regional Council, on any ground, for any loss, damage or expense arising from such use or reliance. The data presented in this Report are available to GNS Science for other use from January 2015. BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCE Tschritter, C.; White, P. 2014. Three-dimensional geological model of the greater Lake Tarawera catchment. GNS Science Consultancy Report 2013/155. 42 p. Project number 631W1026 Confidential 2013 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... III 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 1 2.0 REVIEW OF GEOLOGY AND HHYDROGEOLOGY IN THE GREATER LAKE TARAWERA CATCHMENT ............................................................................. 2 2.1 History and Structure ..................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Major Geological Units in the Study Area ..................................................................... 2 2.2.1 Okataina Rhyolites ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Centre for Building Performance Research and the School Of
    LINZEY | Making a Place: Mangakino 1946-62 | AHA: Architectural History Aotearoa (2008) vol 5:65-71 Making a Place: Mangakino 1946-62 Kate Linzey, Interior Design, Weltec, Wellington ABSTRACT: In between Whakamaru (1949-56) and Maraetai (1946-53) dams, on the Waikato River, sits Mangakino. Planned and built from c1948 to 1951, by the Town Planning section of the Ministry of Works, the civic centre was to provide housing and services for the work force on the Maraetai scheme. The architectural design of these dams has previously been discussed as the work of émigré architect, Fredrick Neumann/Newman (Leach), and the town, as that of Ernst Plischke (Lloyd-Jenkins, Sarnitz). In 1949 the plan for Mangakino was published, alongside the plan for Upper Hutt, in the February-March edition of the Design Review. As two "rapidly growing towns," Upper Hutt and Mangakino are briefly reviewed in the context of two essays ("Who wants community centres?" and "Community Centres" by HCD Somerset), an outline of the curriculum of the new School of Architecture and Town Planning, run by the Architectural Centre, and notification of the 1948 Town Planning Amendment Act. As published in the Design Review, the plan of Mangakino includes a church in the south west, with the sporting facilities to the north and Rangatira Drive flanking a shopping strip on the east. The church sits in a field of grass, isolated and apparently serene. In the drawing published in the monograph Ernst Plischke, however, this building has been cropped off. Focusing on the case of Mangakino, this essay will review the discourse of town planning for secular and religious communities in the late 1940s.
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematical Modelling of Wairakei Geothermal Field
    ANZIAM J. 50(2009), 426–434 doi:10.1017/S1446181109000212 MATHEMATICAL MODELLING OF WAIRAKEI GEOTHERMAL FIELD MALCOLM A. GRANT1 (Received 1 November, 2008; revised 22 April, 2009) Abstract Mathematical modelling of Wairakei geothermal field is reviewed, both lumped- parameter and distributed-parameter models. In both cases it is found that reliable predictions require five to ten years of history for calibration. With such calibration distributed-parameter models are now used for field management. A prudent model of Wairakei, constructed without such historical data, would underestimate field capacity and provide only general projections of the type of changes in surface activity and subsidence. 2000 Mathematics subject classification: primary 86A99. Keywords and phrases: geothermal, reservoir modelling, Wairakei, review. 1. Introduction Wairakei geothermal field is located in the North Island of New Zealand, in the Taupo Volcanic Zone. In the late 1940s there was one geothermal field developed for electrical generation in the world, Laraderello in Italy. This example, and a looming electricity shortage, led to the decision to develop Wairakei for power generation. The first drilling showed a field markedly different from Larderello, as it was full of hot water rather than the expected steam. The subsequent development had a large element of exploration, and there was a significant scientific effort to understand the physical nature of the field. The power station was built by 1958, but research continued thereafter, and to the present day. Part of this effort was mathematical modelling. As pressures drew down with exploitation, it was discovered that the drawdown at depth was extremely uniform across the entire field, so that a single pressure history described this drawdown.
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Energy - Industry Status Report (Year Ending March 2006)
    Prepared for The Energy Efficiency and Conservation Authority Renewable Energy - Industry Status Report (year ending March 2006) By East Harbour Management Services EAST HARBOUR MANAGEMENT SERVICES P O BOX 11 595 WELLINGTON Tel: 64 4 385 3398 Fax: 64 4 385 3397 www.eastharbour.co.nz www.energyinfonz.com June 2006 East Harbour Project # EH243 Field Code Changed - Third Edition This study has been commissioned by the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Authority (EECA). EECA welcome any feedback this report. For further information contact: EECA Phone 04 470 2200 PO Box 388 Wellington New Zealand http://www.eeca.govt.nz/ [email protected] EECA disclaimer: ―It will be noted that the authorship of this document has been attributed to a number of individuals and organisations involved in its production. While all sections have been subject to review and final editing, the opinions expressed remain those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Authority. Recommendations need to be interpreted with care and judgement.‖ Notes: 1. The report focuses on useable energy at source from renewable energy resources, because this is what is pragmatically measurable. Hydro, wave, tidal and wind useable energy is measured as direct output from the electricity generator. Solar primary energy is measured as direct output from the collector. Geothermal primary energy is measured at the well head. Bioenergy is measured as direct output from the heat plant. Solar space heating is not measured. 2. To allow comparison with other studies the following methodologies are followed: Electricity Primary energy for electricity generation (excluding PV) is useable energy at source plus generator losses.
    [Show full text]
  • Hello Please Find Attached, the Following Statements of Evidence-In-Chief for Genesis Energy
    From: Alice Lin To: Plan Hearings Cc: Karen Sky Subject: Proposed Plan Change 7 - Statements of Evidence for Genesis Energy Ltd (Submitter ID 422) Date: Friday, 17 July 2020 2:02:41 pm Attachments: image001.png image002.png image003.png Statement of Evidence by Mark Alan Cain (final 20200717).pdf Statement of Evidence by Roger Graeme Young (final 20200717).pdf 20200717- CLWRP PC7 - FINAL Phil Mitchell Statement of Planning Evidence.pdf Hello Please find attached, the following statements of evidence-in-chief for Genesis Energy Ltd (Submitter ID 422): Mark Cain (Genesis) Phil Mitchell (planning) Roger Young (ecology) I would appreciate it if a receipt confirmation email could be provided please. Many thanks. Kind regards Alice Lin | Environmental Policy & Planning Manager Genesis Energy Ltd | 660 Great South Road, Greenlane, Auckland M. 021 0221 1943 DDI. 09 951 9334 BEFORE THE HEARING COMMISSIONERS IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER Proposed Plan Change 7 to the Canterbury Land and Water Regional Plan STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF MARK ALAN CAIN ON BEHALF OF GENESIS ENERGY LIMITED 17 July 2020 Page 1 of 12 Introduction 1. My name is Mark Alan Cain. I have prepared this evidence on behalf of Genesis Energy (Genesis) in my role as the Tekapo Site Manager. I have 24 years’ experience in the hydro-electricity industry and 11 years’ experience in operational and maintenance roles in the mining industry. 2. I hold an Advanced Trade Certificate and Trade Certificate in Fitting Turning and Machining, a National Certificate in Mechanical Engineering (Level 4), a National Diploma in Business (Level 5), and a National Diploma in Electricity Supply (Level 5) among other qualifications.
    [Show full text]