Parliament and Government

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Parliament and Government Restoring Accountability Recommendations © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of Public Works and Government Services, 2006 Cat. No: CP32-86/3-2006E ISBN: 0-660-19534-8 Available through your local bookseller or through Publishing and Depository Services Public Works and Government Services Canada Ottawa, Ontario KIA OS5 Telephone: (613) 941-5995 Orders only: 1 800 635-7943 Fax: (613) 954-5779 or 1 800 565-7757 Internet: http://publications.gc.ca Ce document est également publié en français sous le titre Rétablir l'imputabilité Recommandations Commission of Inquiry into the Commission d'enquête sur le Sponsorship Program and programme de commandites et Advertising Activities les activités publicitaires Justice John H. Gomery Juge John H. Gomery Commissioner Commissaire February 1, 2006 To Her Excellency The Governor General in Council May it please Your Excellency: As Commissioner appointed by Order in Council P.C. 2004-110 which was promulgated on February 19, 2004 pursuant to Part I of the Inquiries Act, and in accordance with the Terms of Reference assigned therein, I have completed my investigation and analysis of the sponsorship program and advertising activities of the Government of Canada and respectfully submit this report entitled “Restoring Accountability.” This report contains recommendations based on the findings presented in my Fact Finding report released on November 1, 2005, entitled “Who Is Responsible?” John H. Gomery Commissioner Guy-Favreau Complex Complexe Guy-Favreau 200 René-Lévesque Blvd. West 200, boul. René-Lévesque ouest P.O. Box 608, Montreal, Quebec C.P. 608, Montréal (Québec) H2Z 1X4 H2Z 1X4 (514) 283-8093 télécopieur / fax (514) 283-8138 CONTENTS PART ONE: BACKGROUND 1 INTRODUCTION 3 The Commission’s Second Mandate 4 Seeking the Views of Canadians 5 The Need for Greater Accountability 5 Improving Accountability to Parliament 7 Defining Accountability 8 Changing the Culture 10 Outline of the Report 12 2 WHAT HAS BEEN DONE 15 Government Initiatives 16 Changes to Crown Corporations 16 Proposed Reforms to the Financial Administration Act 18 Clarifying Responsibilities and Accountability 19 New Management Reforms 23 Assessing the Reforms 26 3 WHAT CANADIANS SAID 33 The Sponsorship Program: A Unique or a Systemic Problem? 34 Accountability 35 Taking Responsibility 38 Revitalizing the Public Service 39 The Application of Sanctions 40 Advertising, Sponsorships and Politics 42 The Need for Transparency and Access to Information 42 Whistleblowing Legislation 44 Other Integrity Mechanisms 45 The Need for a Culture Change 46 PART TWO: ACCOUNTABILITY 4 PARLIAMENT AND GOVERNMENT 51 The Estimates 54 The Identity and Role of the Public Service 62 Accountability of the Public Service 67 Partisanship and Accountability to Parliament 70 The Role of the Public Accounts Committee 75 5 THE RESPONSIBILITIES AND ACCOUNTABILITIES OF DEPUTY MINISTERS 83 The Statutory Responsibilities of Deputy Ministers 84 Who Are “Senior Public Servants”? 85 The Powers of Deputy Ministers 87 Disagreement about the Accountability of Deputy Ministers before the Public Accounts Committee 91 Deputy Ministerial Responsibility and Accountability 96 Ground Rules for Appearances of Deputy Ministers before Parliamentary Committees 100 Disagreements between Ministers and Deputy Ministers 101 Renewed Emphasis on Administrative Responsibilities 106 Tenure in Office 107 6 STRENGTHENING THE CHAIN OF ACCOUNTABILITY 113 Deputy Ministers 115 The Public Accounts Committee 117 The Treasury Board 119 The Office of the Auditor General 122 A Collaborative Effort 122 7 THE PRIME MINISTER, MINISTERS AND THEIR EXEMPT STAFF 127 The Prime Minister 128 Separating the Political from the Administrative 130 Special Reserve Funds 131 Ministers 132 Exempt Staff 135 8 THE PRIVY COUNCIL OFFICE AND THE CLERK 141 The Privy Council Office 142 The Clerk:The Early Years 146 The Clerk Today 147 The Need for Reform 148 PART THREE: TRANSPARENCY 9 ADVERTISING, SPONSORSHIP INITIATIVES AND LOBBYING 157 Objectives of the Government’s Advertising Policy 158 Changes to Advertising Procedures 159 Defining “Advertising” 160 Advertising Oversight 161 What Is the Appropriate Centre for the Oversight of Government Advertising Activity? 164 Obtaining Value for Money 166 Building Professional Capacity 167 Sponsorships 168 Final Thoughts on Advertising and Sponsorships 171 Overseeing Lobbying 171 10 TRANSPARENCY AND BETTER MANAGEMENT 177 Access to Information 179 Mandatory Record-Keeping 180 Support for Amendments to the Access to Information Act 181 Whistleblower Legislation 185 Sanctions under the Financial Administration Act 187 Appointments to Crown Corporations 188 Internal Audit 190 PART FOUR: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 11 REBALANCING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PARLIAMENT AND GOVERNMENT 197 Consolidated Recommendations 199 APPENDICES Appendix A TERMS OF REFERENCE 207 Appendix B ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBERS 211 Appendix C RESEARCH PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS AND STUDIES 221 Appendix D WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS 225 Appendix E ROUNDTABLE PARTICIPANTS 231 Appendix F CONSULTATION QUESTIONS 237 Appendix G STAFF OF THE COMMISSION 241 PREFACE Preface and Acknowledgements When I undertook to act as Commissioner of this Inquiry,I was conscious of my limitations, one of which was my lack of qualifications and specialized knowledge in the fields of Canadian political institutions, government, and public administration. As the public hearings progressed, I underwent an intensive educational experience in these areas,as witnesses testified about the structure of the federal government in Canada, and the rules, written and unwritten, that govern it. Nonetheless,I was aware that I needed much more expertise than what was being communicated to me in the hearings. In civil or criminal cases, when a Judge is called upon to make a ruling on a matter requiring specialized knowledge,the Judge will expect that the parties involved in the litigation will call to testify expert witnesses able to advise the Court on the technical aspects of the case,and to express informed opinions.Invariably,the experts also produce detailed reports explaining the background of their conclusions. In this way, the Judge ix RESTORING ACCOUNTABILITY:RECOMMENDATIONS becomes sufficiently educated in an area until then unknown to him or her, and is able to come to a rational conclusion. It was on the basis of my experience as a trial judge that I realized that it would be necessary to recruit a team of experts possessing the experience and expertise that I lacked, which could assist and advise the Commission in the preparation of the present Report and the formulation of the recommendations that it contains. The theme that resonated in my mind throughout our hearings and as I began to assess the evidence before me was the necessary link between responsibility and accountability. Last November, I presented my conclusions, based on the evidence, on who was responsible for many of the actions that led to this Inquiry. In this final Report, I offer my views on who should be held accountable for administering our system of government and how to make that system stronger and more transparent. The recommendations in this Report seek to restore accountability to our federal system of government. The Report itself, in the first Chapter, describes in a general way the many sources that were consulted,and in several Appendices the reader will find the names and the qualifications of the persons who provided the Commission with the fruit of their knowledge, experience and wisdom.These are persons who deserve to be called great Canadians, and the Commission is deeply indebted to them all. On behalf of the Commission and on behalf of all Canadians, we thank them sincerely for their time and efforts. Special thanks are due to Mr. Raymond Garneau, who accepted to act as the Chair of the Advisory Committee, and the members of his Committee, which conducted consultations of distinguished experts in public life in five Canadian cities.The Advisory Committee, on the basis of the consultations conducted across Canada and on the basis of x the accumulated experience of its own members, provided the Commission with invaluable insight and counsel.Mr.Garneau took time from a very busy schedule to devote himself whole-heartedly to the task of guiding the work of the Advisory Committee,which he directed with skill and tact. The Advisory Committee was put together at my request by Dr. Donald Savoie, a professor at the University of Moncton, an acknowledged authority on Canadian governmental institutions and practices, and the author of many books and articles on these subjects. I owe him particular thanks for all his efforts in directing the research program, a task that he discharged with remarkable energy and good humour.Dr.Savoie commissioned on our behalf the 17 research studies that form part of this Report, and that have contributed greatly to the Commission’s understanding of the complex issues dealt with in the Report. He also assisted in the drafting of the Report. It is only fair to say that the Commission would not have been able to accomplish its mandate and objectives without his participation. Many others, employees of the Commission and persons engaged by contract to render services to it, worked diligently and under intense pressure to produce the Report on time. I cannot begin to thank each one of them by name for fear of overlooking one or two, but assure them of my gratitude for their expert assistance. Finally,
Recommended publications
  • Libya: Why Are We Involved
    Libya: Why Are We Involved A Policy Update Paper By Derek Burney CDFAI Senior Research Fellow And Senior Strategic Advisor to Ogilvy Renault LLP March, 2011 Prepared for the Canadian Defence & Foreign Affairs Institute 1600, 530 – 8th Avenue S.W., Calgary, AB T2P 3S8 www.cdfai.org © Canadian Defence & Foreign Affairs Institute Other Publications Written For Or Assisted By: The Canadian Defence & Foreign Affairs Institute Operations Security and the Public’s Need to Know Sharon Hobson March, 2011 The Panda Bear Readies to Meet the Polar Bear: China Debates and Formulates Foreign Policy Towards Arctic Affairs and Canada’s Arctic Sovereignty David Curtis Wright March, 2011 ‘Now For the Hard Part’: A User’s Guide to Renewing the Canadian-American Partnership Colin Robertson February, 2011 Canada’s International Policy Statement Five Years Later Andrew Godefroy November, 2010 The ‘Dirty Oil’ Card and Canadian Foreign Policy Paul Chastko October, 2010 China’s Strategic Behaviour Elinor Sloan June, 2010 Reinventing CIDA Barry Carin and Gordon Smith May, 2010 Security in an Uncertain World: A Canadian Perspective on NATO’s New Strategic Concept Paul Chapin, et al March, 2010 The Newly Emerging Arctic Security Environment Rob Huebert March, 2010 Whatever Happened to Peacekeeping? The Future of a Tradition Jocelyn Coulon and Michel Liégeois March, 2010 Democracies and Small Wars Barry Cooper December, 2009 Beneath the Radar: Change or Transformation in the Canada-US North American Defence Relationship James Fergusson December, 2009 The Canada First Defence Strategy – One Year Later George Macdonald October, 2009 Measuring Effectiveness in Complex Operations: What is Good Enough? Sarah Meharg October, 2009 “Connecting the Dots” and the Canadian Counter-Terrorism Effort – Steady Progress or Technical, Bureaucratic, Legal and Political Failure? Eric Lerhe March, 2009 Canada-U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Hill Times, Health Policy Review, 17NOV2014
    TWENTY-FIFTH YEAR, NO. 1260 CANADA’S POLITICS AND GOVERNMENT NEWSWEEKLY MONDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 2014 $4.00 HEARD ON THE HILL BUZZ NEWS HARASSMENT Artist paints Queen, other prominent MPs like ‘kings, queens in their people, wants a national portrait gallery little domains,’ contribute to ‘culture of silence’: Clancy BY LAURA RYCKEWAERT “The combination of power and testosterone often leads, unfortu- n arm’s-length process needs nately, to poor judgment, especially Ato be established to deal in a system where there has been with allegations of misconduct no real process to date,” said Nancy or harassment—sexual and Peckford, executive director of otherwise—on Parliament Hill, Equal Voice Canada, a multi-par- say experts, as the culture on tisan organization focused on the Hill is more conducive to getting more women elected. inappropriate behaviour than the average workplace. Continued on page 14 NEWS HARASSMENT Campbell, Proctor call on two unnamed NDP harassment victims to speak up publicly BY ABBAS RANA Liberal Senator and a former A NDP MP say the two un- identifi ed NDP MPs who have You don’t say: Queen Elizabeth, oil on canvas, by artist Lorena Ziraldo. Ms. Ziraldo said she got fed up that Ottawa doesn’t have accused two now-suspended a national portrait gallery, so started her own, kind of, or at least until Nov. 22. Read HOH p. 2. Photograph courtesy of Lorena Ziraldo Liberal MPs of “serious person- al misconduct” should identify themselves publicly and share their experiences with Canadians, NEWS LEGISLATION arguing that it is not only a ques- tion of fairness, but would also be returns on Monday, as the race helpful to address the issue in a Feds to push ahead on begins to move bills through the transparent fashion.
    [Show full text]
  • Brief by Professor François Larocque Research Chair In
    BRIEF BY PROFESSOR FRANÇOIS LAROCQUE RESEARCH CHAIR IN LANGUAGE RIGHTS UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA PRESENTED TO THE SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE ON OFFICIAL LANGUAGES AS PART OF ITS STUDY OF THE OFFICIAL LANGUAGES REFORM PROPOSAL UNVEILED ON FEBRUARY 19, 2021, BY THE MINISTER OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND OFFICIAL LANGUAGES, ENGLISH AND FRENCH: TOWARDS A SUBSTANTIVE EQUALITY OF OFFICIAL LANGUAGES IN CANADA MAY 31, 2021 Professor François Larocque Faculty of Law, Common Law Section University of Ottawa 57 Louis Pasteur Ottawa, ON K1J 6N5 Telephone: 613-562-5800, ext. 3283 Email: [email protected] 1. Thank you very much to the honourable members of the Senate Standing Committee on Official Languages (the “Committee”) for inviting me to testify and submit a brief as part of the study of the official languages reform proposal entitled French and English: Towards a Substantive Equality of Official Languages in Canada (“the reform proposal”). A) The reform proposal includes ambitious and essential measures 2. First, I would like to congratulate the Minister of Economic Development and Official Languages for her leadership and vision. It is, in my opinion, the most ambitious official languages reform proposal since the enactment of the Constitution Act, 1982 (“CA1982”)1 and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (“Charter”),2 which enshrined the main provisions of the Official Languages Act (“OLA”)3 of 1969 in the Canadian Constitution. The last reform of the OLA was in 1988 and it is past time to modernize it to adapt it to Canada’s linguistic realities and challenges in the 21st century. 3. The Charter and the OLA proclaim that “English and French are the official languages of Canada and have equality of status and equal rights and privileges as to their use in all institutions of the Parliament and government of Canada.”4 In reality, however, as reported by Statistics Canada,5 English is dominant everywhere, while French is declining, including in Quebec.
    [Show full text]
  • CONSTITUTION-MAKING AS INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS a Case Study of the 1980 Canadian Constitutional Negotiations Adam D
    CONSTITUTION-MAKING AS INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS A Case Study of the 1980 Canadian Constitutional Negotiations Adam D. McDonald1, University of Waterloo The Constitution Act, 1982 is a document that profoundly changed the Canadian political landscape. It brought home the highest law of the land; it provided Canadians a mechanism to change their Constitution; it created a Charter of Rights and Freedoms, entrenched within the Constitution, out of the reach of one government. Perhaps its most important legacies, however, are the seemingly permanent isolation of Quebec and the primacy of place in Canadian history it gave Pierre Trudeau. This paper will examine the constitutional history of Canada with a view to determining what made the 1980 negotiating sessions successful when the sessions that led to both the Meech Lake Accord and the Charlottetown Accord were not. It is important, however, to note that the word “successful” is used in the sense that an agreement was reached. Unlike Meech and Charlottetown, the repatriated constitution did not have unanimity among the participants. The question that comes to mind is this: if the governments did not really agree in 1981, why was a Constitution ratified? More importantly, are there lessons that can be drawn from this agreement that can be applied to the failed accords of the Mulroney era? In order to complete this examination, the paper will be divided into two parts. In the first part, Canada’s constitutional story will be told. This is a necessary part of any examination of the constitutional negotiations, for without knowing what the players wanted historically, one cannot see what was changed by the 1980s.
    [Show full text]
  • HT-EM Logos Stacked(4C)
    EXCLUSIVE POLITICAL COCOVERAGE:OVVEERARAGGE: NNEWS,REMEMBERING FEATURES, AND ANALYSISLYSISS INSIDEINNSSIDIDE ACCESS TO HILL TRANSPORTATION POLICY BRIEFING PP. 19-33 JEAN LAPIERRE P. 10 INFORMATION P. 14 CLIMBERS P.41 TWENTY-SEVENTH YEAR, NO. 1328 CANADA’S POLITICS AND GOVERNMENT NEWSWEEKLY MONDAY, APRIL 4, 2016 $5.00 NEWS SYRIAN REFUGEES NEWS NDP ‘Very, very Wernick planning to stick NDP policy few’ Syrian convention refugees came around PCO for a while, ‘one for the to Canada push on for ‘nimbleness and ages,’ many from refugee eager to vote camps: CBSA offi cial Bolduc agility’ in public service on Mulcair’s leadership BY ABBAS RANA “Very, very few” of the BY LAURA RYCKEWAERT thousands of Syrian refugees Privy Council who have come to Canada came Clerk Michael More than 1,500 NDP members from refugee camps and most had Wernick says will attend the party’s policy con- been living in rented apartments his current vention in Edmonton this week to in Syria’s neighbouring countries, priorities include help shape the NDP’s future. a senior CBSA offi cial told creating a public Many are eager to see a review Parliament in February. service that has vote on NDP Leader Tom Mulcair’s Conservatives are now accusing ‘nimbleness leadership and there’s much talk the federal government of convey- and agility’ so about the direction of the party and ing a false perception to Canadians it can meet its “soul,” after its crushing defeat that refugees were selected from the needs of a in the last federal election. refugee camps. But the government ‘busy, ambitious NDP analyst Ian Capstick says it has never said all Syrian government that said the event will be “one for the wants to do a lot ages.” Continued on page 35 in it’s mandate, but I think this Continued on page 34 would be true had we been NEWS SENATE dealing with a blue government NEWS PUBLIC SERVICE or an orange Sen.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BEST :BROADCAST BRIEFING in CANADA Thursday, June 1, 2006 Volume 14, Number 2 Page One of Three
    THE BEST :BROADCAST BRIEFING IN CANADA Thursday, June 1, 2006 Volume 14, Number 2 Page One of Three DO NOT RETRANSMIT THIS ADIO: MOJO Sports Radio (CHMJ) Vancouver, owned by Corus, PUBLICATION BEYOND YOUR will see 14 people out of a job come this weekend. On Monday, June RECEPTION POINT R5, CHMJ begins airing continuous traffic reports during the day and the best of talk from sister station CKNW Vancouver at other times. Howard Christensen, Publisher Broadcast Dialogue New ID is AM730 Continuous Drive Time Traffic and the Best of Talk and 18 Turtle Path will also feature the Vancouver Whitecaps and Giants and Seattle Lagoon City ON L0K 1B0 Seahawks games. Among those out of work are CKNW Sports Director JP (705) 484-0752 [email protected] McConnell and MOJO personalities John McKeachie, Bob Marjanovich, www.broadcastdialogue.com Jeff Paterson and Blake Price. Seen as the 100% CANADIAN As dagger to MOJO’s heart Canada’s public was CHUM-owned Team 1040 Vancouver’s acquisition of broadcaster, CBC offers all Canadians Vancouver Canucks radio rights, owned for decades by broadcasting services CKNW. And earlier, Team 1040 took play-by-play rights to that reflect and celebrate our country’s diverse the BC Lions away from Corus... Y101 (CKBY-FM) Ottawa heritage, culture and stories. is in the midst of a three-day Radiothon – May 31 to June 2 SENIOR BROADCAST TECHNOLOGIST – for the Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO). th This is the 8 annual Y101 Country Cares Challenge for Your primary role will be to ensure the CHEO and organizers say they expect to break the $1- maintenance of broadcasting equipment and million dollar mark at this year’s event..
    [Show full text]
  • 1866 (C) Circa 1510 (A) 1863
    BONUS : Paintings together with their year of completion. (A) 1863 (B) 1866 (C) circa 1510 Vancouver Estival Trivia Open, 2012, FARSIDE team BONUS : Federal cabinet ministers, 1940 to 1990 (A) (B) (C) (D) Norman Rogers James Ralston Ernest Lapointe Joseph-Enoil Michaud James Ralston Mackenzie King James Ilsley Louis St. Laurent 1940s Andrew McNaughton 1940s Douglas Abbott Louis St. Laurent James Ilsley Louis St. Laurent Brooke Claxton Douglas Abbott Lester Pearson Stuart Garson 1950s 1950s Ralph Campney Walter Harris John Diefenbaker George Pearkes Sidney Smith Davie Fulton Donald Fleming Douglas Harkness Howard Green Donald Fleming George Nowlan Gordon Churchill Lionel Chevrier Guy Favreau Walter Gordon 1960s Paul Hellyer 1960s Paul Martin Lucien Cardin Mitchell Sharp Pierre Trudeau Leo Cadieux John Turner Edgar Benson Donald Macdonald Mitchell Sharp Edgar Benson Otto Lang John Turner James Richardson 1970s Allan MacEachen 1970s Ron Basford Donald Macdonald Don Jamieson Barney Danson Otto Lang Jean Chretien Allan McKinnon Flora MacDonald JacquesMarc Lalonde Flynn John Crosbie Gilles Lamontagne Mark MacGuigan Jean Chretien Allan MacEachen JeanJacques Blais Allan MacEachen Mark MacGuigan Marc Lalonde Robert Coates Jean Chretien Donald Johnston 1980s Erik Nielsen John Crosbie 1980s Perrin Beatty Joe Clark Ray Hnatyshyn Michael Wilson Bill McKnight Doug Lewis BONUS : Name these plays by Oscar Wilde, for 10 points each. You have 30 seconds. (A) THE PAGE OF HERODIAS: Look at the moon! How strange the moon seems! She is like a woman rising from a tomb. She is like a dead woman. You would fancy she was looking for dead things. THE YOUNG SYRIAN: She has a strange look.
    [Show full text]
  • Deputy Ministers And'politicization in the Government of Canada: Lessons Learned from the 2006-2007 Conservative Transition
    DEPUTY MINISTERS AND'POLITICIZATION IN THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA: LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE 2006-2007 CONSERVATIVE TRANSITION by SHANNON LEIGH WELLS B.A (Hons) Dalhousie University, 2005 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Political Science) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA August 2007 © Shannon Leigh Wells, 2007 Abstract This thesis analyses the 2006-07 Conservative transition in the Government of Canada by asking the following: is there evidence of overt partisan politicization of the deputy ministers during this transition? Significantly, there is no evidence of overt politicization. Harper has not forced departure of incumbent deputy ministers, nor has he appointed a significant number of known partisan allies from outside the public service. Instead, Harper has retained the overwhelming majority of deputy ministers who served the previous Liberal government. However, the 2006-07 transition also suggests considerable lateral career mobility of deputy ministers within the highest levels of government. The thesis argues that lateral mobility is explained by the "corporate" governance structure in the government of Canada, according to which deputy ministers are expected to identify with the government's broad policy goals and mobilize support for them. High degrees of lateral mobility during the Conservative transition provide evidence to suggest that a potentially rigid bureaucratic system can be made responsive to the policy priorities of a new government without compromising the professional norms of a non-partisan, career public service. ii Table of Contents Abstract ii Table of Contents > iii List of Tables. '. ...iv Acknowledgements '.
    [Show full text]
  • Immigration Reform in Canada and the United States
    1 IMMIGRATION REFORM IN CANADA AND THE UNITED STATES: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS Mai Nguyen (York University) Garth Stevenson (Brock University) Paper prepared for presentation to the annual meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association, Vancouver, British Columbia, June 4, 2008. 2 It is not surprising that most public policies in Canada and the United States are fairly similar, nor is it surprising that innovations in public policy have often occurred at about the same time in the two countries. Similar economic, social and cultural conditions in the two countries might be expected to produce such a result. It is also a fact, although not always acknowledged by Canadians, that American innovations in policy have often been copied in Canada within a few years. John A. Macdonald’s National Policy was based on policies implemented by the United States in the 1860s. More recent examples would include anti- combines legislation in the early 20th century, the largely abortive Bennett New Deal of the 1930s, P.C. 1003 of 1944 (modelled on the Wagner Act), the formation of Via Rail (modelled on Amtrak), the deregulation of the transportation industries in the 1980s, and even the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Immigration is one area of public policy in which the two countries have followed somewhat similar, although not identical, paths. Both accepted large numbers of immigrants from European sources during the century that followed the war of 1812. Both sought to limit Asian immigration by overtly discriminatory means beginning in the latter part of the 19th century. Both, by more subtle means, limited immigration from southern and eastern Europe in the first half of the 20th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Shaping Commitment: Resolving Canada's Strategy Gap In
    SHAPING COMMITMENT: RESolving Canada’S STRATEGY GAP IN AFGHANISTAN AND BEYOND Colonel D. Craig Hilton Canadian Army July 2007 Visit our website for other free publication downloads http://www.StrategicStudiesInstitute.army.mil/ To rate this publication click here. This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. As such, it is in the public domain, and under the provisions of Title 17, United States Code, Section 105, it may not be copyrighted. ***** The views expressed in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Army, the Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. This report is cleared for public release; distribution is unlimited. ***** Comments pertaining to this report are invited and should be forwarded to: Director, Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, 122 Forbes Ave, Carlisle, PA 17013-5244. ***** All Strategic Studies Institute (SSI) publications are available on the SSI homepage for electronic dissemination. Hard copies of this report also may be ordered from our homepage. SSI's homepage address is: www.StrategicStudies Institute.army.mil. ***** The Strategic Studies Institute publishes a monthly e-mail newsletter to update the national security community on the research of our analysts, recent and forthcoming publications, and upcoming conferences sponsored by the Institute. Each newsletter also provides a strategic commentary by one of our research analysts. If you are interested in receiving this newsletter, please subscribe on our homepage at www.StrategicStudiesInstitute. army.mil/newsletter/. ISBN 1-58487-299-3 ii PREFACE The U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Asper Nation Other Books by Marc Edge
    Asper Nation other books by marc edge Pacific Press: The Unauthorized Story of Vancouver’s Newspaper Monopoly Red Line, Blue Line, Bottom Line: How Push Came to Shove Between the National Hockey League and Its Players ASPER NATION Canada’s Most Dangerous Media Company Marc Edge NEW STAR BOOKS VANCOUVER 2007 new star books ltd. 107 — 3477 Commercial Street | Vancouver, bc v5n 4e8 | canada 1574 Gulf Rd., #1517 | Point Roberts, wa 98281 | usa www.NewStarBooks.com | [email protected] Copyright Marc Edge 2007. All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior written consent of the publisher or a licence from the Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency (access Copyright). Publication of this work is made possible by the support of the Canada Council, the Government of Canada through the Department of Cana- dian Heritage Book Publishing Industry Development Program, the British Columbia Arts Council, and the Province of British Columbia through the Book Publishing Tax Credit. Printed and bound in Canada by Marquis Printing, Cap-St-Ignace, QC First printing, October 2007 library and archives canada cataloguing in publication Edge, Marc, 1954– Asper nation : Canada’s most dangerous media company / Marc Edge. Includes bibliographical references and index. isbn 978-1-55420-032-0 1. CanWest Global Communications Corp. — History. 2. Asper, I.H., 1932–2003. I. Title. hd2810.12.c378d34 2007 384.5506'571 c2007–903983–9 For the Clarks – Lynda, Al, Laura, Spencer, and Chloe – and especially their hot tub, without which this book could never have been written.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study of the 1980 Canadian Constitutional Negotiations Mcdonald, Adam D
    www.ssoar.info Constitution-making as intergovernmental relations: a case study of the 1980 Canadian constitutional negotiations McDonald, Adam D. Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: McDonald, A. D. (2004). Constitution-making as intergovernmental relations: a case study of the 1980 Canadian constitutional negotiations. Federal Governance, 1(1), 1-23. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-47048-8 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Basic Digital Peer Publishing-Lizenz This document is made available under a Basic Digital Peer zur Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den DiPP-Lizenzen Publishing Licence. For more Information see: finden Sie hier: http://www.dipp.nrw.de/lizenzen/dppl/service/dppl/ http://www.dipp.nrw.de/lizenzen/dppl/service/dppl/ CONSTITUTION-MAKING AS INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS A Case Study of the 1980 Canadian Constitutional Negotiations Adam D. McDonald1, University of Waterloo The Constitution Act, 1982 is a document that profoundly changed the Canadian political landscape. It brought home the highest law of the land; it provided Canadians a mechanism to change their Constitution; it created a Charter of Rights and Freedoms, entrenched within the Constitution, out of the reach of one government. Perhaps its most important legacies, however, are the seemingly permanent isolation of Quebec and the primacy of place in Canadian history it gave Pierre Trudeau. This paper will examine the constitutional history of Canada with a view to determining what made the 1980 negotiating sessions successful when the sessions that led to both the Meech Lake Accord and the Charlottetown Accord were not. It is important, however, to note that the word “successful” is used in the sense that an agreement was reached.
    [Show full text]