DOCSLIB.ORG

Nigeria Situation Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nigeria Situation Report NIGERIA SITUATION REPORT SPECIAL FOCUS ON THE 2015 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS Report No. 1 / 26 January 2015 ~ 0 ~ Table of Contents Executive Summary ……………………………………………………………….... 2 Introduction …………………………………………………………………………… 4 Antecedents of the two Leading Presidential Candidates ………………………. 4 State of Play in the Forthcoming Contest …....................................................... 6 State of the Main Political Parties …………………………………………………. 7 Major Areas of Concern …………………………………………………………….. 8 General Insecurity and Boko Haram Insurgency ……………………. 8 INEC and the Conduct of Credible Elections ………………………… 10 Election-Related Violence ………………………………………….. …. 11 State of the Economy and Corruption ………………………………… 12 Nigerian Power Centres and the February 2015 Elections …………………….. 13 Possible Outcomes of the Elections ………………………………………………. 14 Reactions to the Announced Results of the Elections …………………………… 16 Conclusion ……………………………………………………………………………. 16 ~ 1 ~ JKS & Associates Ltd. Nigeria Situation Report No. 1 26 January 2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In a few weeks from now, Nigerians will go into crucial elections to elect their President, Governors in 28 of the 36 States of the Federation and members of the National and State Legislatures. Although Nigerian elections are usually fiercely contested, there is apprehension that the 2015 elections will be accompanied by violence, before, during and after the elections. The violence will not only be between the parties but also within the parties as a result of the selection processes for the contestants for the various elective offices. While the latter has resulted to large movements of politicians from one party to another and may not continue to generate too much violence, inter-party violence continues and may spill over to the post-election phase. 2. The general insecurity in the country, especially the insurgency in the North-East States of Adamawa, Borno and Yobe, and threats by supporters of leading Presidential candidates that their candidate must win or there will be violence, are considered a real cause for concern. The Boko Haram insurgency, rather than being contained by the military, is escalating and there are doubts as to whether elections could be held successfully in those States. What effect this will have on the Presidential, gubernatorial and legislative elections and the ability of the contestants to meet the constitutional requirements of having 25% of the votes of two-thirds of the election space is still an unanswered question. Whereas there are a few voices asking for postponement of the election because of these questions, the majority view is that the elections should and will hold as scheduled. 3. Questions are also being asked with respect to the Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC’s) preparedness to conduct free and fair elections all over the country. While it is generally agreed that INEC has greatly improved in its performance, there are still questions as to its ability to resist pressure, from all sides, to freely operate and act independently. Yet, the elections will be considered free, fair and credible, to the extent that INEC is considered an unbiased umpire. 4. Eleven Presidential candidates have emerged from the 27 registered political parties. However, the two main contenders are the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) candidate and current President, Goodluck Ebele Jonathan, and the All Progressives Congress (APC) candidate, former military Head of State, Major General Muhammadu Buhari. They were the main candidates in the 2011 election when the PDP candidate won by over 10 million votes. Buhari had contested in the three elections and lost. Nigerians wonder if he will be lucky this fourth time. 5. That question would appear to be legitimate in view of a number of factors, including the fact that, PDP’s dominance has been eroded with many former PDP stalwarts now in the main opposition party, APC, which is an amalgam of several opposition parties. It is also apparent that Buhari has, through his selection by the APC as its Presidential candidate, extended his support base far beyond the narrow confines of the North to include the South West where he did poorly in the 2003, ~ 2 ~ 2007 and 2011 Presidential elections. While President Jonathan’s administration does have credible achievements to its credit, the current state of the economy and the inability of the Federal Government to successfully quell the insurgency in the North-East of the country will count against him. The influence of the power centres in the country is crucial but it can be used to its advantage by either party. 6. Predicting the possible outcome of elections is a challenge anywhere and is particularly so in Nigeria. There are three possible outcomes: either the President wins outright in the first round with majority of the votes and 25% of the votes in two- thirds of the 36 States, or his opponent does so, or neither meets the criteria for a first round win, necessitating a run-off. 7. From our analyses, it is possible for one of the two candidates to emerge in the first round since they could each just obtain the 25% of the votes from 24 States. Thus, for either President Jonathan to win or General Buhari to do so, all the factors referred to earlier will need to be substantially in their favour. Apart from the power of incumbency, this will mean that the PDP is able to correct the serious internal crisis it has had, the war on insurgency is substantially addressed, the economic situation greatly improved and the government is able to better portray its achievements than it has so far. Equally, the party needs to be able to play up the baggage that both the APC and its candidates have. There is not much time for all this to happen before the election and the momentum the APC and its candidate seem to have gained may tilt the result in their favour. But, as the saying goes in this country: “24 hours is very long in Nigerian politics”. 8. The nation must be ready to deal with the likely reaction of a Jonathan loss or win or a Buhari win or loss, as either result is likely to provoke violent reactions from their supporters. Moderation on the part of the leaders of both parties could help reduce the intensity of violence as would be the fairness of the security forces in managing the violence, as well as how well INEC is perceived to be free and fair. 9. From our analysis, we assign ELEVATED as the risk rating for election violence. ~ 3 ~ JKS & ASSOCIATES LTD. NIGERIA SITUATION REPORT NO. 1 SPECIAL FOCUS ON THE 2015 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS INTRODUCTION In less than a month, Nigerians will go to the polls to elect their President, some State Governors and members of the National and State Legislatures. It is a very crucial and massive exercise as it involves not just the election of a President but also that of the Governors of as many as 28 out of the 36 States of Nigeria. Of this number, ten will be contesting for a second term and eight will be contesting for vacant seats. There will be no election in eight States whose Governors are still enjoying their first or second terms in office. Nigerians and their friends are, therefore, apprehensive about what would happen before, during and after the elections. 2. Already, one of the important exercises that preface elections in Nigeria has been concluded: the selection of Presidential and Governorship candidates by all the parties. So far, eleven Presidential candidates have emerged from the 27 registered parties. Expectedly, the ruling People’s Democratic Party (PDP) has selected the incumbent President, Goodluck Jonathan, as its Presidential candidate, while the main opposition party, the All Progressives Congress (APC), has selected a former Head of State, General Muhammadu Buhari, as its Presidential flag bearer. ANTECEDENTS OF THE TWO MAJOR PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES PEOPLES DEMOCRATIC PARTY 3. President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan is the PDP candidate for the 2015 Presidential Elections. Born on 20 November 1957, he has been the President of Nigeria since 2010 when he succeeded late President Umaru Yar'Adua to complete the latter’s tenure in accordance with the Nigerian Constitution. Prior to being President, he served as Governor of Bayelsa State from 2005 to 2007 and as Vice - President of Nigeria from 2007 to 2010. And before this, he was a University lecturer in the University of Port Harcourt. Elected President in 2011, he is seeking a second term. ~ 4 ~ ALL PROGRESSIVES CONGRESS 4. General Muhammadu Buhari is the APC Presidential candidate. He was born on 17 December 1942. A retired Major-General of the Nigerian Army, he was the military Head of State from 31 December 1983 to 27 August 1985. In March 1976, the then Head of State, General Olusegun Obasanjo, appointed General Muhammadu Buhari as the Federal Commissioner (position now called Minister) for Petroleum and Natural Resources. When the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation was created in 1976, Buhari was also appointed as its Chairman, a position he held until 1978. He later served as the Chairman of the Petroleum Trust Fund (PTF), a body created by the government of General Sani Abacha and funded from the revenue generated by the increase in price of petroleum products, to pursue various developmental projects around the country. He has thrice contested, unsuccessfully, for the office of President in 2003, 2007 under the platform of the All Nigeria People’s Party (ANPP) and with the Congress for Progressive Change (CPC) in 2011, moving from one political
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NIGERIA COUNTRY of ORIGIN INFORMATION (COI) REPORT COI Service
    NIGERIA COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION (COI) REPORT COI Service 6 January 2012 NIGERIA 6 JANUARY 2012 Contents Preface Latest news EVENTS IN NIGERIA FROM 16 DECEMBER 2011 TO 3 JANUARY 2012 Useful news sources for further information REPORTS ON NIGERIA PUBLISHED OR ACCESSED AFTER 15 DECEMBER 2011 Paragraphs Background Information 1. GEOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................ 1.01 Map ........................................................................................................................ 1.07 2. ECONOMY ................................................................................................................ 2.01 3. HISTORY (1960 – 2011) ........................................................................................... 3.01 Independence (1960) – 2010 ................................................................................ 3.02 Late 2010 to February 2011 ................................................................................. 3.04 4. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS (MARCH 2011 TO NOVEMBER 2011) ...................................... 4.01 Elections: April, 2011 ....................................................................................... 4.01 Inter-communal violence in the middle belt of Nigeria ................................. 4.08 Boko Haram ...................................................................................................... 4.14 Human rights in the Niger Delta .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • State Fragility and the Reign of Terror in Nigeria: a Case Study of Boko Haram Terrorism
    State Fragility and the Reign of Terror in Nigeria: A Case Study of Boko Haram Terrorism Being a Research Paper submitted in fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Arts in Conflict Transformation and Peace Studies at the University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa By Benjamin Maiangwa Prof Ufo Okeke Uzodike (Supervisor) November 2012 DECLARATION I, Benjamin Maiangwa, hereby declare that this dissertation is my own original work and that all sources have been accurately reported and acknowledged, and that this document has not previously in its entirety or in part been submitted at any university in order to obtain academic qualification. ----------------------------------- ------------------------------- Benjamin Maiangwa Date i DECLARATION BY SUPERVISOR I hereby declare that I acted as supervisor for this MA student: Student’s Full Name: Benjamin Maiangwa Student Number: 211529158 Title of Thesis: State Fragility and the Reign of Terror in Nigeria: A Case Study of Boko Haram Terrorism Regular consultation took place between the student and I throughout the study. I advised the student to the best of my ability and approved the final document for submission to the School of Social Sciences’ Higher Degrees Office for examination by the University appointed Examiners. Supervisor ___________________________ _______________________ Professor Ufo Okeke Uzodike Date ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank all those who contributed to the success and completion of this study. F irst, I am grateful to God almighty for his unconditional love. The sterling and constructive suggestions offered by Professor Ufo Okeke Uzodike, and his willingness to share his time so generously, made the planning, development and completion of the study possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Inclusion Works Nigeria Situational Analysis Version II - June 2020
    Inclusion Works Nigeria Situational Analysis Version II - June 2020 The Inclusion Works programme is testing innovative ways to improve economic empowerment and inclusion for people with disabilities, enabling them to find employment and earn a living. The Inclusion Works programme is a part of the Inclusive Futures initiative. The Institute of Development Studies (IDS) has prepared Situational Analyses (SITANs) which synthesise the most recent existing literature and evidence (drawing on government and non- government sources available online) about the country generally and on factors relating to persons with disabilities involvement in formal employment. For more information about how the situational analyses were conducted see page 29. This situational analysis addresses the question: “what is the current situation in relation to formal sector employment for persons with disabilities in Nigeria?”. Inclusion Works operates in four countries: Bangladesh, Kenya, Nigeria and Uganda. The SITAN can be used throughout the programme, by all those involved in it, to better understand the current context and available evidence. This will help lead to better informed projects which may be focussing on different actors and aspects of the topic (e.g. persons with disabilities, employers, government, organisations for people with disabilities, partnerships, policy) and help with situating the different activities within the wider country context. Where possible, the SITANs also flag up gaps in evidence which the Inclusion Works programme may be interested in addressing. As living documents they will be updated and adapted to include newly published evidence and to reflect any new areas of interest in the programme as it develops. The earliest version of this SITAN was dated June 2019 and reflected the context in Nigeria before the programme was implemented.
    [Show full text]
  • From Direct Capture to Mandate Protection: Experiences from the 2011 Nigerian Elections
    FROM DIRECT CAPTURE TO MANDATE PROTECTION: EXPERIENCES FROM THE 2011 NIGERIAN ELECTIONS 1 2 Contents Chapter 1 ................................................................................................................................................. 7 Introduction: 2011 and the Protection of the People’s Mandate – the CDD Experience ............................ 7 Brief History of Nigeria’s Elections ..................................................................................................... 7 Elections and Mandate Protection in Nigeria ........................................................................................ 8 CDD, Elections Mandate Protection and Deepening Democracy .......................................................... 9 Outline of Chapters ............................................................................................................................ 10 References ......................................................................................................................................... 11 Chapter 2 ............................................................................................................................................... 11 An Assessment of the Legal Framework for the 2011 General Elections ................................................ 11 The 2007 General Elections and Aftermath ........................................................................................ 12 The Electoral Reform Committee and the Amendment of Electoral Laws in Nigeria .........................
    [Show full text]
  • Konflik Politik Pasca Pemilu 2011 Di Nigeria 1
    Fradana Anantara Yunif. 2013. Konflik Politik Pasca Pemilu 2011 Di Nigeria 1 Konflik Politik Pasca Pemilu 2011 Di Nigeria (Politic Conflict After 2011 Election In Nigeria) Fradana Anantara Yunif; Drs. Sugiyanto E.K, MA., Ph.D; Suyani Indriastuti, S.Sos., M.Si. Ilmu Hubungan Internasional, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Jember (UNEJ) Jl. Kalimantan 37, Jember 68121 E-mail: DPU @unej.ac.id Abstrak Pemilu 2011 diadakan pemerintah Nigeria untuk memilih presiden sebagai pengganti presiden Umaru Yar'Adua yang meninggal dunia karena sakit. Hasil pemilu 2011 akhirnya menghasilkan Goodluck Jonathan sebagai pemenang dengan perolehan suara mencapai 59 persen mengungguli pesaing muslim dari wilayah utara Muhammadu Buhari yang hanya meraih 32 persen suara. Namun, Buhari menuding kemenangan Jonathan ini sarat kecurangan. Maka, sebagai aksi protes, para pendukung Buhari mengobarkan kekerasan di beberapa negara bagian di Nigeria utara, melukai dan menewaskan ratusan orang. Muhammadu Buhari dan pendukungnya mempermasalahkan hasil pemilu, pasalnya ada perbedaan yang tajam dalam perhitungan suara di wilayah utara dan selatan. Menurut teori konflik internal dari Michael E Brown, konflik politik di Nigeria ini dipicu oleh faktor terpilihnya Goodluck Jonathan sebagai presiden pada pemilu 2011, padahal seharusnya menurut kesepakatan antara beberapa partai politik disana, calon yang menjabat sebagai presiden adalah dari kelompok yang beragama Islam. Namun sebenarnya ada beberapa faktor lain yang menjadi penyebab konflik politik di Nigeria, seperti struktur, politik, sosial dan ekonomi. Kata Kunci: Nigeria, Pemilu, Konflik Abstract The election of 2011 in Nigeria was held to elect the president of the Nigerian government in lieu of president Umaru Yar'Adua, who died due to his illness.
    [Show full text]
  • Party System Institutionalization and the 2019 State Elections in Nigeria
    Regional & Federal Studies ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/frfs20 Party system institutionalization and the 2019 state elections in Nigeria Henrik Angerbrandt To cite this article: Henrik Angerbrandt (2020) Party system institutionalization and the 2019 state elections in Nigeria, Regional & Federal Studies, 30:3, 415-440, DOI: 10.1080/13597566.2020.1758073 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2020.1758073 © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Published online: 04 May 2020. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 3697 View related articles View Crossmark data Citing articles: 3 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=frfs20 REGIONAL AND FEDERAL STUDIES 2020, VOL. 30, NO. 3, 415–440 https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2020.1758073 Party system institutionalization and the 2019 state elections in Nigeria Henrik Angerbrandt Department of Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala Universitet, Uppsala, Sweden ABSTRACT This article analyses the 2019 state elections in Nigeria with a focus on party system institutionalization. The analysis shows that votes shifted and that voter turnout was higher in the state elections than in the national elections two weeks earlier. This indicates that voters regard the state elections as meaningful and that they assess subnational issues. However, the analysis of the 2019 state elections also shows that democratic norms and practices are weakly institutionalized in the political parties. It is argued that the political parties contribute to making elections in Nigeria disconnected from a majority of the citizens.
    [Show full text]
  • Nigeria Liebe Leserinnen, Liebe Leser
    Länderberichte 16 Religionsfreiheit: Nigeria Liebe Leserinnen, liebe Leser, Nigeria ist fraglos die zahlenmäßig größte schwarze Nation der Welt. Ihre heterogene Bevölkerung ist geprägt von eth- nischer, kultureller und religiöser Vielfalt. Religion spielt in Nigeria eine sehr große Rolle. Sie durchdringt das private und öffentliche Leben seiner Bürger. Zugleich schreibt man ihr leider zahlreiche Konflikte innerhalb der nigerianischen Gesellschaft zu. Mehrere politische, soziale und wirtschaft- liche Trennlinien verlaufen in Nigeria entlang religiöser Trennlinien. Das Wissen um die Rolle und das Recht auf Religionsfreiheit in Nigeria ist daher ein Muss. Dabei versteht sich Nigeria als säkularer Staat, der die freie Religionsausübung garantiert und keine Religion zur Staatsreligion erhebt. Diese Broschüre widmet sich dem Thema der Religionsfreiheit in Nigeria. Dazu erläutern die Autoren zunächst den rechtlichen Rahmen für das Recht auf Religionsfreiheit – aus internationaler, nationaler und regionaler Perspektive. Anschließend untersuchen sie die Einführung des Scharia-Rechts in Nigeria und ihre Folgen für die Religionsfreiheit. Dann widmen sie sich den wichtigsten Religionsgemeinschaften im Land, ihrer Zusammensetzung, ihren Merkmalen und ihrer religiösen Praxis. Zudem erörtern sie kurz die aktuellen Probleme, die mit dem Scharia-Recht einhergehen, und untersuchen extremistische religiöse Gruppierungen wie die Boko-Haram-Sekte. Anschließend vermitteln sie einen Überblick über den rechtlichen Status von Religionsgemeinschaften, die reli- giöse Erziehung in Nigeria sowie den Einfluss der Religion auf das private und öffentliche Leben der Bürger Nigerias. Abschließend sprechen sie Empfehlungen bezüglich des Schutzes und der Förderung der Religionsfreiheit in Nigeria aus. missio hat durch langjährige Partnerkontakte und eine darauf aufbauende Pro- jekt-Policy verschiedene Initiativen zur Förderung des Dialogs der Religionen in Nigeria unterstützt und wird die weitere Entwicklung aufmerksam verfolgen und zu einem Klima des Dialogs in Nigeria seinen Beitrag leisten.
    [Show full text]
  • Elections and Democratic Consolidation in West Africa: Comparative Study of Nigeria and Senegal, 1999-2012
    Elections and Democratic Consolidation in West Africa: Comparative Study of Nigeria and Senegal, 1999-2012 By Abiodun Surajudeen Fatai Supervisor Prof. Suzanne Francis A dissertation Submitted in fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. 2017 i Plagiarism Declaration I………………………………………………..declared as follows that: I. The research reported in this thesis, except where otherwise stated is my original work. II. This thesis has not been submitted for any degree or examination at any other Universities or academic institutions of learning. III. This thesis does not contain other persons’ data, pictures, graph or other information unless precisely acknowledged as being from them. IV. This thesis also, does not contain other person’s writings, unless specifically acknowledged as being sourced from other person’s research work. Where other written sources have been used in this work, their words have been re-worded and the general information attributed to them has been referenced. In addition, where exactly their words have been used, they have been placed inside quotations marks, and referenced as well. V. Finally, this thesis does not comprise text, graphics or tables copied and pasted from the Internet without specifically acknowledging them, and detailing the sources in the thesis and in the reference section. Signed ………………………………. Abiodun Fatai ii Abstract The study examines elections and democratic consolidation in West Africa using Nigeria and Senegal as a comparative lens from 1999-2012. It is predicated on the contradictory trajectories of electoral politics in West Africa under the so-called third wave of democratization and their implication for the consolidation of democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 One-Party Dominant Systems and Constitutional Democracy in Africa
    One-Party Dominant Systems and Constitutional Democracy in Africa: A Comparative Study of Nigeria and South Africa Submitted by Babatunde Adetayo OSENI to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Politics In October 2012 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. Signature: ……………………………… 1 Abstract Democratization is a fragile process, easily reversed when and where its advance is most recent. African countries present particular challenges to democratization, given generally low levels of economic and social development, often combined with ethnic and cultural fractionalization. Debates about democratization have not been sufficiently developed with the African context in mind. In particular, assessment of the effects of presidential systems on democratization has not been sensitively applied to African cases where most regimes are Presidential. Moreover, a particular feature of African democracy, the dominant party within a multi-party system, also raises questions that have not been so pertinent elsewhere. Debates about the merits and demerits of electoral system options for democratic consolidation also require more empirical analysis in Africa. This study is based on the assumption that debates about the relationship between political institutions and democratization in Africa can only be advanced by recognition of the interactions that can be identified between the institutions of presidential, parliamentary and party systems, particularly within the dynamics of one-party dominance.
    [Show full text]
  • Retired Military Officers Are Gaining Influential Political
    http://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/ Research Commons at the University of Waikato Copyright Statement: The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). The thesis may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use: Any use you make of these documents or images must be for research or private study purposes only, and you may not make them available to any other person. Authors control the copyright of their thesis. You will recognise the author’s right to be identified as the author of the thesis, and due acknowledgement will be made to the author where appropriate. You will obtain the author’s permission before publishing any material from the thesis. A New Form of Authoritarianism? Rethinking Military Politics in Post-1999 Nigeria A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science and Public Policy at The University of Waikato by IBIKUNLE EDWARD ADEAKIN 2015 Acknowledgements My gratitude and appreciation goes to my chief supervisor Professor Daniel Zirker whose insightful contributions and guidance made it possible for me to complete this thesis. I am also grateful to my other supervisor, Dr. Alan Simpson who took his time to read this work and offered his advice. I am grateful to the administrative support I got as a doctoral student from the programme administrator of political science and public policy, Frances Douch, to the subject librarian, Jillene Bydder, and other staff at the post-graduate office.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Correspondence a Response to Jacob Zenn on Boko Haram And
    PERSPECTIVES ON TERRORISM Volume 12, Issue 2 Special Correspondence A Response to Jacob Zenn on Boko Haram and al-Qa‘ida by Adam Higazi, Brandon Kendhammer, Kyari Mohammed, Marc-Antoine Pérouse de Montclos, and Alex Thurston Editorial Note The Editorial Board believes that the competing narratives in the research on Boko Haram (predominantly local vs. strongly influenced from abroad) can and should be debated in a healthy manner. However, upon reflection, the Editors acknowledge that this correspondence criticizing Jacob Zenn’s article (from the December 2017 issue of our journal) also contains some allegations regarding Mr. Zenn as a person, detracting from the level of scholarly discourse we strive for in Perspectives on Terrorism. In the June 2018 issue of the journal, we provide Mr. Zenn with an opportunity to respond to his critics, focused specifically on how the evidence he has collected supports his analysis. We invite readers to have a look at his evidence and the evidence of his critics and judge for themselves their respective merits. A recent special issue of Perspectives on Terrorism, published in December 2017 (Volume 11, Number 6, pp. 174-190), included an article by Jacob Zenn entitled “Demystifying al-Qaida in Nigeria: Cases from Boko Haram’s Founding, Launch of Jihad and Suicide Bombings.” The article makes problematic claims that we - as specialists who have done research on Boko Haram - believe merit a response. For us, it is important to respond because we believe crucial perspectives are lost when analysts treat Boko Haram as a mere extension of the global jihadist movement.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: Democracy and Good Governance
    ABSTRACT Title of dissertation: Democracy and Good Governance in a multi-ethnic society: Nigeria as a Case Study. A grassroot study of Igbo, Yoruba and Hausa-Fulani in Nigeria 1999-2011 Cyprian Friday Okoro, (Dr. phil), Political Science, 2012 Dissertation co-supervised by: Professor Dirk Berg-Schlosser Department of Political Science, and Professor Claudia Derichs Department of Political Science The “ethnic contraption of Nigerian state” was a natural creation, but exploited by the British through colonisation, and then propagated by the ethnic nationalities therein through the internally entrenched mindsets. The divergence in political mindset derives from her multi-ethnic composition, which created a non solid but soluble political environment. This environment so created and the actors in it, both active and non active attract the attention of scholars who want to probe the continuing poor returns in the democratic adventures of the country. I probed into the fundamental issues responsible for her poor runs on the democratic tracks and the premise was based on the perspectives of people within the three ethnic groups under study, as well as through the exploratory works of Donald L Horowitz, and Clifford Geertz which I call the Horowitz- Geertz framework. A strong ethno-political mindset among the three nationalities of Igbo, Yoruba, and Hausa-Fulani stood as the nucleus of this study. The mindset is evident in their political philosophies, their membership of the registered political parties, their open and discreet political rivalry, and their pattern of political argument. 1 I found also that the political philosophies of the various personalities in the first republic of 1960-1965, and the second republic of 1979-1983 still dominate the present democratic process, from 1999 to 2011, though with minimal difference noticeable only in the personalities within the political parties.
    [Show full text]