DOCSLIB.ORG

Friday, September 25, 1998

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Friday, September 25, 1998 CANADA VOLUME 135 S NUMBER 126 S 1st SESSION S 36th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, September 25, 1998 Speaker: The Honourable Gilbert Parent CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire'' at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 8385 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, September 25, 1998 The House met at 10 a.m. Two federal government departments and one independent tribu- nal are directly involved under SIMA. As actions taken under _______________ SIMA result in the imposition of duties on imported goods, the Minister of Finance is responsible for the legislation. Prayers Revenue Canada and the Canadian International Trade Tribunal _______________ share responsibility for investigations under the law and Revenue Canada enforces anti-dumping and countervailing duties at the border. GOVERNMENT ORDERS With respect to international implications and negotiations, it is foreign affairs and finance which work together on trade remedy D (1000) policy to co-ordinate Canada’s import and export interests and develop our international trade negotiating positions. [English] Before discussing the merits of Bill C-35, I would like to provide SPECIAL IMPORT MEASURES ACT some background as to why these amendments are being proposed. Hon. Diane Marleau (for the Minister of Finance, Lib.) Canada has a long history in the use of trade remedies. In fact in moved that Bill C-35, an act to amend the Special Import Measures 1904 Canada introduced the world’s first anti-dumping legislation. Act and the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Act, be read the second time and referred to a committee. Since then our trade remedy system has undergone various refinements due to changing economic conditions and the evolu- D (1005 ) tion of international trade rules. These international rules are Mr. Tony Valeri (Parliamentary Secretary to Minister of governed by the World Trade Organization, or the WTO, which sets Finance, Lib.): Madam Speaker, today it is certainly a privilege out detailed rights and obligations of member countries in adminis- for me to begin debate on Bill C-35. tering trade and remedy protection. Essentially this bill contains amendments to Canada’s anti- As the imposition of anti-dumping or countervailing duties dumping and countervailing duty law, known as the Special Import represents an exception from a country’s WTO commitments not to Measures Act, or SIMA. It responds directly to the recommenda- raise tariffs and not to discriminate in its treatment of imports, the tions contained in a 1996 parliamentary report on Canada’s trade right to impose these special duties is carefully circumscribed. remedy system. In general, the Canadian SIMA system is comparable to the These amendments will fine-tune the law by rationalizing the systems of other major users such as the United States and the investigative process, increasing transparency and procedural fair- European Union. The WTO does, however, provide some latitude ness, and in fact enhancing the system’s ability to consider in the administration of trade remedy laws. As a result, there are representations from various segments of Canadian business. some variations between systems, largely reflecting differing legal cultures and economic circumstances. The bill also includes certain technical changes that clarify existing provisions and practices under SIMA and the Canadian There are, of course, important domestic interests on both sides International Trade Tribunal Act. of the trade remedies equation. SIMA is an important component of Canada’s trade remedy One of the key challenges associated with the Special Import legislation. It authorizes the federal government to impose anti- Measures Act was to strike the right balance between the interests dumping and countervailing duties to offset injury to domestic of industries seeking trade remedy action and the interests of firms caused by foreign dumping and subsidies. In this regard it consumers and other manufacturers who may be negatively af- implements Canada’s rights and obligations under the World Trade fected by the imposition of anti-dumping or countervailing duties Organization agreements on subsidies and anti-dumping. on imported goods. 8386 COMMONS DEBATES September 25, 1998 Government Orders D (1010 ) Generally, the recommendations represented adjustments to the SIMA investigation process that allow the system to more ade- quately consider the views of various parties which have a stake in First and foremost, this law is intended to assist Canadian this law. enterprises by offsetting the injurious economic effects resulting from dumping or underpricing practices of foreign exporters, or in the case of subsidies, to remedy the injurious effects of the subsidy I want to be clear that it was for this reason that the government practices of foreign governments. However, the downstream eco- supported virtually all of the subcommittees’ recommendations. nomic interests cannot be ignored. What we have before us today is Bill C-35, which essentially reflects the subcommittees’ recommendations and the requirement that the subcommittees put forward in asking the government to As markets operate increasingly on a global basis, market review these recommendations and build them into legislation. openness becomes a critical factor in attracting investment and maintaining the competitiveness of our domestic firms. There are key changes in Bill C-35, the first being the rational- ization of investigative functions of Revenue Canada and the Canadian manufacturers often have to rely on imported inputs, Canadian International Trade Tribunal to better reflect their respec- for example, to meet specific quality and technical needs of their tive areas of expertise. customers. The second would enhance procedural fairness and transparency According to the OECD, the operations of Canadian manufactur- by bringing Revenue Canada’s treatment of confidential informa- ers rely more on imported inputs than their G-7 counterparts in the tion more in line with the tribunal’s practice respecting the U.S., France, Germany, Japan and the U.K. This reflects the disclosure of confidential information. relatively smaller size of the Canadian economy, as well as its high level of integration with the United States. The third would ensure that the tribunal, in its fact finding, would benefit more fully from expert evidence by permitting Given this, SIMA must represent a balancing act. It must provide expert witnesses to play a more effective role in tribunal inquiries. effective relief to Canadian firms injured by foreign dumping or subsidies while not imposing unnecessary or excessive burden on The fourth would establish new penalty provisions to deter any downstream producers or consumers. This was the key challenge unauthorized disclosure or misuse of confidential information by for lawmakers when SIMA was first developed in 1984 and it legal counsel or expert witnesses in the context of SIMA investiga- certainly remains the challenge today. tions. When the Minister of Finance requested the House of Commons D (1015 ) Standing Committees on Finance and Foreign Affairs and Interna- tional Trade to jointly review SIMA in 1996, he noted that The fifth would improve the provisions which allow the Deputy significant changes had taken place in the global trading environ- Minister of National Revenue to accept an undertaking from ment since 1984 and that it was time to reassess whether the law exporters to raise prices as an alternative to the imposition of continued to reflect the interests of Canadian producers. anti-dumping duties and to ensure that all interested persons are afforded an opportunity to provide views when undertakings are Two subcommittees were asked to undertake this review. They being considered. heard from a broad range of interests, including domestic produc- ers, importers, retailers, academics, trade practitioners and govern- The sixth would require the tribunal to cumulate the injurious ment officials. These parties gave evidence and submitted effects of dumping or subsidizing from more than one country proposals for changes based on their experience with the SIMA consistent with the single price effect in the Canadian market of system. such practices. It was based on these submissions and their deliberations that the The final change would clarify the conditions under which the subcommittees concluded in their report that Canada’s trade reme- tribunal can consider issues of broader public interest and the types dy system under SIMA continues to respond to the needs of of measures it may recommend in a public interest report. Canadian producers that seek protection under the law, while affording downstream producers and consumers an opportunity to The discussions that took place in the recent parliamentary have their interests considered. review of SIMA reflected the changes that have taken place in the structure of the Canadian economy since the law was established in They also identified areas where improvements could be made to 1984. These changes will ensure that the Special Import Measures the system to make it more efficient and more responsive to Act remains a strong trade instrument which truly protects Cana- Canada’s economic needs. dian producers injured by dumped or subsidized imports, while at September 25, 1998 COMMONS DEBATES 8387 Government Orders the same time allowing an opportunity for other producers and whatever commodities they can, including steel, and to sell to consumers to have their interests considered. countries like Canada and the U.S.A. in a desperate attempt to prop up their sagging economies at home. It certainly introduces important changes to Canada’s trade remedy system which take account of the interests of all stakehold- During the subcommittees’ hearings Canadian steel producers ers. It is for the reasons that I have outlined that I would urge all of wanted the Canadian government to get tough with American my colleagues to support its passage. producers. It is certainly within the power of the Canadian govern- ment to do so. It could make it more difficult and costly for U.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Journaux Journals
    HOUSE OF COMMONS OF CANADA CHAMBRE DES COMMUNES DU CANADA 37th PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION 37e LÉGISLATURE, 1re SESSION Journals Journaux No. 12 No 12 Tuesday, February 13, 2001 Le mardi 13 février 2001 10:00 a.m. 10 heures The Clerk informed the House of the unavoidable absence of the Le Greffier informe la Chambre de l’absence inévitable du Speaker. Président. Whereupon, Mr. Kilger (Stormont — Dundas — Charlotten- Sur ce, M. Kilger (Stormont — Dundas — Charlottenburgh), burgh), Deputy Speaker and Chairman of Committees of the Vice–président et président des Comités pléniers, assume la Whole, took the Chair, pursuant to subsection 43(1) of the présidence, conformément au paragraphe 43(1) de la Loi sur le Parliament of Canada Act. Parlement du Canada. PRAYERS PRIÈRE DAILY ROUTINE OF BUSINESS AFFAIRES COURANTES ORDINAIRES PRESENTING REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES PRÉSENTATION DE RAPPORTS DE COMITÉS Mr. Lee (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the M. Lee (secrétaire parlementaire du leader du gouvernement à la Government in the House of Commons), from the Standing Chambre des communes), du Comité permanent de la procédure et Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, presented the des affaires de la Chambre, présente le 1er rapport de ce Comité, 1st Report of the Committee, which was as follows: dont voici le texte : The Committee recommends, pursuant to Standing Orders 104 Votre Comité recommande, conformément au mandat que lui and 114, that the list of members and associate members for confèrent les articles 104 et 114 du Règlement, que la liste
    [Show full text]
  • GASOLINE PRICES in CANADA Report of the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology
    HOUSE OF COMMONS CANADA GASOLINE PRICES IN CANADA Report of the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology Walt Lastewka, M.P. Chair November 2003 The Speaker of the House hereby grants permission to reproduce this document, in whole or in part for use in schools and for other purposes such as private study, research, criticism, review or newspaper summary. Any commercial or other use or reproduction of this publication requires the express prior written authorization of the Speaker of the House of Commons. If this document contains excerpts or the full text of briefs presented to the Committee, permission to reproduce these briefs, in whole or in part, must be obtained from their authors. Also available on the Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire: http://www.parl.gc.ca Available from Communication Canada — Publishing, Ottawa, Canada K1A 0S9 GASOLINE PRICES IN CANADA Report of the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology Walt Lastewka, M.P. Chair November 2003 STANDING COMMITTEE ON INDUSTRY, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY CHAIR Walt Lastewka, M.P. St. Catharines, Ontario VICE-CHAIRS Dan McTeague, M.P. Pickering―Ajax―Uxbridge, Ontario James Rajotte, M.P. Edmonton Southwest, Alberta MEMBERS André Bachand, M.P. Richmond—Arthabaska, Québec Larry Bagnell, M.P. Yukon, Yukon Paul Crête, M.P. Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup— Témiscouata—Les Basques, Québec Brian Fitzpatrick, M.P. Prince Albert, Saskatchewan Cheryl Gallant, M.P. Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke, Ontario Jocelyne Girard-Bujold, M.P. Jonquière, Québec Serge Marcil, M.P. Beauharnois―Salaberry, Québec Brian Masse, M.P. Windsor West, Ontario The Hon. Gilbert Normand, M.P. Bellechasse—Etchemins— Montmagny—L’Islet, Québec Andy Savoy, M.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada and the Middle East Today: Electoral Politics and Foreign Policy
    CANADA AND THE MIDDLE EAST TODAY: ELECTORAL POLITICS AND FOREIGN POLICY Donald Barry Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper came to power in 2006 with little experience in foreign affairs but with a well developed plan to transform his minority Conservative administration into a majority government replacing the Liberals as Canada’s “natural governing party.”1 Because his party’s core of Anglo-Protestant supporters was not large enough to achieve this goal, Harper appealed to non- traditional Conservatives, including Jews, on the basis of shared social values. His efforts were matched by those of Jewish leaders and the government of Israel to win the backing of the government and its followers in the face of declining domestic support for Israel and the rise of militant Islamic fundamentalism. These factors accelerated a change in Canada’s Middle East policy that began under Prime Minister Paul Martin, from a carefully balanced stance to one that overwhelm- ingly favors Israel. Harper’s “pro-Israel politics,” Michelle Collins observes, has “won the respect—and support—of a large segment of Canada’s organized Jewish community.”2 However, it has isolated Canada from significant shifts in Middle East diplomacy and marginalized its ability to play a constructive role in the region. Harper and the Jewish Vote When he became leader of the Canadian Alliance party, which merged with the Progressive Conservatives to form the Conservative Party of Canada in 2004, Tom Flanagan says that Harper realized “The traditional Conservative base of Anglophone Protestants [was] too narrow to win modern Canadian elections.”3 In a speech to the conservative organization Civitas, in 2003, Harper argued that the only way to achieve power was to focus not on the tired wish list of economic conservatives or “neo-cons,” as they’d become known, but on what he called “theo-cons”—those social conservatives who care passionately about hot-button issues that turn on family, crime, and defense.
    [Show full text]
  • JOHN A. MACDONALD the Indispensable Politician
    JOHN A. MACDONALD The Indispensable Politician by Alastair C.F. Gillespie With a Foreword by the Hon. Peter MacKay Board of Directors CHAIR Brian Flemming Rob Wildeboer International lawyer, writer, and policy advisor, Halifax Executive Chairman, Martinrea International Inc., Robert Fulford Vaughan Former Editor of Saturday Night magazine, columnist VICE CHAIR with the National Post, Ottawa Jacquelyn Thayer Scott Wayne Gudbranson Past President and Professor, CEO, Branham Group Inc., Ottawa Cape Breton University, Sydney Stanley Hartt MANAGING DIRECTOR Counsel, Norton Rose Fulbright LLP, Toronto Brian Lee Crowley, Ottawa Calvin Helin SECRETARY Aboriginal author and entrepreneur, Vancouver Lincoln Caylor Partner, Bennett Jones LLP, Toronto Peter John Nicholson Inaugural President, Council of Canadian Academies, TREASURER Annapolis Royal Martin MacKinnon CFO, Black Bull Resources Inc., Halifax Hon. Jim Peterson Former federal cabinet minister, Counsel at Fasken DIRECTORS Martineau, Toronto Pierre Casgrain Director and Corporate Secretary of Casgrain Maurice B. Tobin & Company Limited, Montreal The Tobin Foundation, Washington DC Erin Chutter Executive Chair, Global Energy Metals Corporation, Vancouver Research Advisory Board Laura Jones Janet Ajzenstat, Executive Vice-President of the Canadian Federation Professor Emeritus of Politics, McMaster University of Independent Business, Vancouver Brian Ferguson, Vaughn MacLellan Professor, Health Care Economics, University of Guelph DLA Piper (Canada) LLP, Toronto Jack Granatstein, Historian and former head of the Canadian War Museum Advisory Council Patrick James, Dornsife Dean’s Professor, University of Southern John Beck California President and CEO, Aecon Enterprises Inc., Toronto Rainer Knopff, Navjeet (Bob) Dhillon Professor Emeritus of Politics, University of Calgary President and CEO, Mainstreet Equity Corp., Calgary Larry Martin, Jim Dinning Prinicipal, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Docket 119 Synthesis Iof Comments on the Review.Pdf
    i ii Synthesis of Public Comment on the Forthcoming Review by the Federal Governments of Canada and the United States of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement A Report to the Governments of the United States and Canada January 2006 The views expressed in this synthesis are those of the individuals and organizations who participated in the public comment process. They are not the views of the International Joint Commission. INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION JOINT MIXTE COMMISSION INTERNATIONALE Canada and United States Canada et États-Unis INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION JOINT MIXTE COMMISSION INTERNATIONALE Canada and United States Canada et États-Unis Herb Gray Dennis Schornack Chair, Canadian Section Chair, United States Section Robert Gourd Irene Brooks Commissioner Commissioner Jack Blaney Allen Olson Commissioner Commissioner International Joint Commission Offices Canadian Section United States Section 234 Laurier Ave. West, 22nd Floor 1250 23rd Street, NW, Suite 100 Ottawa, ON K1P 6K6 Washington, D.C. 20440 Phone: (613) 995-2984 Phone: (202) 736-9000 Fax: (613) 993-5583 Fax: (202) 467-0746 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Great Lakes Regional Office 100 Ouellette Avenue, 8th Floor Windsor, ON N9A 6T3 or P.O. Box 32869, Detroit, MI 48232 Phone: (519) 257-6700 or (313) 226-2170 Fax: (519) 257-6740 Email: [email protected] Acknowledgements The International Joint Commission thanks the people from the Great Lakes, the St. Lawrence River and beyond who took part in the public comment process and whose voices are echoed in this report. ISBN 1-894280-60-1 This report is available online at www.ijc.org.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MOST RESPONSIBLE POLITICIAN: Who’S the MRP for Health Care in Canada? Shawn Whatley
    THE MOST RESPONSIBLE POLITICIAN: Who’s the MRP for Health Care in Canada? Shawn Whatley AUGUST 2019 A Macdonald-Laurier Institute Publication Board of Directors Richard Fadden Former National Security Advisor to the Prime Minister, CHAIR Ottawa Pierre Casgrain Brian Flemming Director and Corporate Secretary, International lawyer, writer, and policy advisor, Halifax Casgrain & Company Limited, Montreal Robert Fulford VICE-CHAIR Former Editor of Saturday Night magazine, Laura Jones columnist with the National Post, Ottawa Executive Vice-President of the Canadian Federation Wayne Gudbranson of Independent Business, Vancouver CEO, Branham Group Inc., Ottawa MANAGING DIRECTOR Calvin Helin Brian Lee Crowley, Ottawa Aboriginal author and entrepreneur, Vancouver SECRETARY Peter John Nicholson Vaughn MacLellan Inaugural President, Council of Canadian Academies, DLA Piper (Canada) LLP, Toronto Annapolis Royal TREASURER Hon. Jim Peterson Martin MacKinnon Former federal cabinet minister, Co-Founder and CEO, B4checkin, Halifax Counsel at Fasken Martineau, Toronto DIRECTORS Barry Sookman Blaine Favel Senior Partner, McCarthy Tétrault, Toronto CEO, Kanata Earth Inc., Cut Knife, Saskatchewan Jacquelyn Thayer Scott Jayson Myers Past President and Professor, Cape Breton University, Chief Executive Officer, Sydney Jayson Myers Public Affairs Inc., Aberfoyle Rob Wildeboer Dan Nowlan Executive Chairman, Martinrea International Inc., Vice Chair, Investment Banking, National Bank Vaughan Financial, Toronto Vijay Sappani Co-Founder and Chief Strategy Officer,
    [Show full text]
  • The Informer
    Bill 65 passed on May 10, 2000 during the 37th Session, founded the Ontario Association of Former Parliamentarians. It was the first Bill in Ontario history to be introduced by a Legislative Committee. ONTARIO ASSOCIATION OF FORMER PARLIMENTARIANS SUMMER 2017 Bill 65 passed on May 10, 2000 during the 37th Session, founded the Ontario Association of Former Parliamentarians. It was the first Bill in Ontario history to be introduced by a Legislative Committee. SUMMER 2017 Table Of Contents Interview: Leona Dombrowsky Page 3 Interview: Steve Mahoney Page 5 Obituary: Gerry Martiniuk Page 8 AGM Recap Page 10 Hugh O’Neil Frienship Garden Page 11 Interview: Bill Murdoch Page 13 Interview: Phil Gillies Page 16 Interview: Sharon Murdock Page 19 Interview: Rolando P. Vera Rodas Page 21 Ceremonial Flag Raising Area Page 23 Margaret Campbell Page 24 Tributes Page 26 Contact Us Page 27 2 Bill 65 passed on May 10, 2000 during the 37th Session, founded the Ontario Association of Former Parliamentarians. It was the first Bill in Ontario history to be introduced by a Legislative Committee. Interview: Leona Dombrowsky M. P. P. Liberal, Cabinet Minister Hastings-Frontenac-Lennox and Addington 1999-2007 Prince Edward-Hastings 2007-2011 “It is critical to have an understanding that everything we do has an impact, either positive or negative on the environment.” Leona Dombrowsky’s interest in politics started with dinner table talk when she was young. While her parents were not involved in partisan politics, they were always interested in the issues of the day and hence Leona, growing up in the French Settlement north of Tweed, developed an interest in politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..146 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 8.00)
    CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 140 Ï NUMBER 098 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 38th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, May 13, 2005 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire´´ at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 5957 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, May 13, 2005 The House met at 10 a.m. Parliament on February 23, 2005, and Bill C-48, an act to authorize the Minister of Finance to make certain payments, shall be disposed of as follows: 1. Any division thereon requested before the expiry of the time for consideration of Government Orders on Thursday, May 19, 2005, shall be deferred to that time; Prayers 2. At the expiry of the time for consideration of Government Orders on Thursday, May 19, 2005, all questions necessary for the disposal of the second reading stage of (1) Bill C-43 and (2) Bill C-48 shall be put and decided forthwith and successively, Ï (1000) without further debate, amendment or deferral. [English] Ï (1010) MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE The Speaker: Does the hon. government House leader have the The Speaker: I have the honour to inform the House that a unanimous consent of the House for this motion? message has been received from the Senate informing this House Some hon. members: Agreed. that the Senate has passed certain bills, to which the concurrence of this House is desired. Some hon. members: No. Mr. Jay Hill (Prince George—Peace River, CPC): Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Friday, October 2, 1998
    CANADA VOLUME 135 S NUMBER 131 S 1st SESSION S 36th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, October 2, 1998 Speaker: The Honourable Gilbert Parent CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire'' at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 8689 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, October 2, 1998 The House met at 10 a.m. An hon. member: Let us not exaggerate. _______________ Hon. Don Boudria: —in its supposed wisdom, to resort to a procedural mechanism so as to prevent the bill from going forward. Prayers The opposition has asked that consideration of the bill to help small businesses be postponed for six months. _______________ Hon. Lucienne Robillard: What a contradiction! GOVERNMENT ORDERS Hon. Don Boudria: The Minister of Citizenship and Immigra- tion points out how contradictory this is. She is, as usual, right on the mark. D (1005) It is important that this bill to help small businesses go ahead. [English] [English] CANADA SMALL BUSINESS FINANCING ACT It is important that the opposition not cause delays on this bill by The House resumed from September 29 consideration of the moving dilatory motions, hoist motions or other procedural tricks motion that Bill C-53, an act to increase the availability of to stop this bill from going ahead. I do not think procedural tricks financing for the establishment, expansion, modernization and should be going on. Therefore I move: improvement of small businesses, be read the second time and That the question be now put. referred to a committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Wednesday, April 24, 1996
    CANADA VOLUME 134 S NUMBER 032 S 2nd SESSION S 35th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Wednesday, April 24, 1996 Speaker: The Honourable Gilbert Parent CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) The House of Commons Debates are also available on the Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 1883 HOUSE OF COMMONS Wednesday, April 24, 1996 The House met at 2 p.m. [English] _______________ LIBERAL PARTY OF CANADA Prayers Mr. Ken Epp (Elk Island, Ref.): Mr. Speaker, voters need accurate information to make wise decisions at election time. With _______________ one vote they are asked to choose their member of Parliament, select the government for the term, indirectly choose the Prime The Speaker: As is our practice on Wednesdays, we will now Minister and give their approval to a complete all or nothing list of sing O Canada, which will be led by the hon. member for agenda items. Vancouver East. During an election campaign it is not acceptable to say that the [Editor’s Note: Whereupon members sang the national anthem.] GST will be axed with pledges to resign if it is not, to write in small print that it will be harmonized, but to keep it and hide it once the _____________________________________________ election has been won. It is not acceptable to promise more free votes if all this means is that the status quo of free votes on private members’ bills will be maintained. It is not acceptable to say that STATEMENTS BY MEMBERS MPs will be given more authority to represent their constituents if it means nothing and that MPs will still be whipped into submis- [English] sion by threats and actions of expulsion.
    [Show full text]
  • Friday, October 4, 1996
    CANADA VOLUME 134 S NUMBER 081 S 2nd SESSION S 35th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, October 4, 1996 Speaker: The Honourable Gilbert Parent CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) The House of Commons Debates are also available on the Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 5097 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, October 4, 1996 The House met at 10 a.m. D (1005) _______________ I would like to talk about an individual case that happened in my own constituency which has ramifications for this bill. Many Prayers members of Parliament will probably be able to relate to stories like this because we all have situations which we confront from day _______________ to day. This constituent’s name is Carol. She was married to an abusive husband. Her story is really the plight of thousands of women, and GOVERNMENT ORDERS even some men I suppose, across Canada. Day in and day out they live in silent fear, not just fear of abuse, but in Carol’s case fear for [English] her own life. She was badly beaten by her husband in 1993. She did the right thing, the one which I always encourage spouses in CRIMINAL CODE abusive situations to do, and that is to get in touch with the police. She called the police and her husband was charged. The House resumed from October 3, consideration of the motion that Bill C-55, an act to amend the Criminal Code (high risk Unfortunately, as is often the case this made her husband very offenders), the Corrections and Conditional Release Act, the angry.
    [Show full text]
  • It-Tlettax-Il Leġiżlatura Pl 1090
    IT-TLETTAX-IL LEĠIŻLATURA P.L. 1090 Dokument imqiegħed fuq il-Mejda tal-Kamra tad-Deputati fis-Seduta Numru 74 tal-25 ta’ Jannar 2018 mill-Ispeaker, l-Onor. Anġlu Farrugia. ___________________________ Raymond Scicluna Skrivan tal-Kamra 24th Conference of Speakers and Presiding Officers of the Commonwealth (CSPOC) 8-13 January 2018 Seychelles Hon Anglu Farrugia, Speaker RAPPORT LILL-ISPEAKER DWAR PARTECIPAZZJONI F'KONFERENZA/LAQGMA/ZJARA TA' NATURA PARLAMENTARI BARRA MINN MALT A 1. TITLU TAL-KONFERENZA/LAQGMA: 24TH CONFERENCE OF SPEAKERS AND PRESIDING OFFICERS OF THE COMMONWEALTH 2. DATA: 8-13 TA' JANNAR 2018 3. ISEM IL-MEMBRU /I LI PPARTECIPAW: Speaker Anglu Farrugia 4. SUGGETT /1 FUQ L-AGENDA: KOPJA TAL-PROGRAMM ANNESS MA' DAN IR-RAPPORT (ANNESS I) 5. KONKLUZJONIJIET TAL-LAQGMA, JEKK IKUN IL-KAZ: Fil-bidu tal-konferenza, uhud mill-partedpanti li huma membri fil-lnunitat permanenti iltaqghu ghall­ i. laqgha annwali taghhom. Malta hi patti minn dan il-kutnitat bhala raprezentanti tal-gzejjer Brittanid u r-Regjun tal-Mediterran. F'din il-laqgha giet diskussa !-agenda proposta ghall-konferenza, u gew diskussi 1-possibilitajiet ta' fejn jistghu jigu organizzati 1-laqghat u 1-konferenzi li jmiss. r· Il-konferenza kienet forma ta' diskussjonijiet imqassma fsezzjonijiet u workshops, fejn gew maghzula 1-kelliema, li kienu Speakers minn pajjizi varji tal-Commonwealth biex jaghmlu 1-Indirizz Ewlieni. Speakers ohra gew maghzula sabiex jaghmlu indirizzi iqsar ftl-workshops li segwew. Is-sezzjonijiet kienu mqassma kif gej: " 1. The role rif the Speaker in strengthening Parliamentary diplomacy in both regional and international moperation 2. Use rif technolof!Y to support lVIembers and House Business 3.
    [Show full text]