ICT Software Development and Creative Services Sector
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Bosnia and Herzegovina Joint Opinion on the Legal
Strasbourg, Warsaw, 9 December 2019 CDL-AD(2019)026 Opinion No. 951/2019 Or. Engl. ODIHR Opinion Nr.:FoA-BiH/360/2019 EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) OSCE OFFICE FOR DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS AND HUMAN RIGHTS (OSCE/ODIHR) BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA JOINT OPINION ON THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK GOVERNING THE FREEDOM OF PEACEFUL ASSEMBLY IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA, IN ITS TWO ENTITIES AND IN BRČKO DISTRICT Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 121st Plenary Session (Venice, 6-7 December 2019) On the basis of comments by Ms Claire BAZY-MALAURIE (Member, France) Mr Paolo CAROZZA (Member, United States of America) Mr Nicolae ESANU (Substitute member, Moldova) Mr Jean-Claude SCHOLSEM (substitute member, Belgium) This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL-AD(2019)026 - 2 - Table of Contents I. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 3 II. Background and Scope of the Opinion ...................................................................... 4 III. International Standards .............................................................................................. 5 IV. Legal context and legislative competence .................................................................. 6 V. Analysis ..................................................................................................................... 8 A. Definitions of public assembly .................................................................................. -
Elections in the Western Balkans: Fragile Progress in Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Serbia
Elections in the Western Balkans: Fragile Progress in Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Serbia Graduate Policy Workshop January 2017 Authors Edward Atkinson, Nicholas Collins, Aparna Krishnamurthy, Mae Lindsey, Yanchuan Liu, David Logan, Ken Sofer, Aditya Sriraman, Francisco Varela Sandoval Advisor Jeff Fischer CONTENTS About the WWS Graduate Policy Workshop ........................................................................................iv Acknowledgements ..............................................................................................................................iv Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Albania ................................................................................................................................................... 2 Background and Context .................................................................................................................. 2 Description of Electoral and Political Processes and Institutions ................................................... 3 Electoral and Political Issues ............................................................................................................ 4 Electoral Process Vulnerabilities .......................................................................................................................... 4 Political Process Vulnerabilities ........................................................................................................................... -
Czech Development Cooperation in Bosnia and Herzegovina Icons Icons 48
CZECH DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA ICONS ICONS 48 17 ICONS: COLOUR VERSION ICONS 48 ICONS NO ZERO GOOD HEALTH QUALITY GENDER CLEAN WATER POVERTY HUNGER AND WELL-BEING EDUCATION EQUALITY AND SANITATION CZECH DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 17 ICONS: COLOUR VERSION NO ZEROAFFORDABLE AND GOODDECENT HEALTH WORK AND QUALITYINDUSTRY, INNOVATION GENDERREDUCED CLEANSUSTAINABLE WATER CITIES RESPONSIBLE POVERTY HUNGERCLEAN ENERGY ANDECONOMIC WELL-BEING GROWTH EDUCATIONAND INFRASTRUCTURE EQUALITYINEQUALITIES ANDAND SANITATION COMMUNITIES CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION Bosnia and Herzegovina is one of the Czech Republic’s Thematic priorities and SDGs: Sustainable development goals most important development cooperation partners. AFFORDABLE AND DECENTCLIMATE WORK AND INDUSTRY,LIFE INNOVATION REDUCEDLIFE SUSTAINABLEPEACE, JUSTICE CITIES RESPONSIBLEPARTNERSHIPS Over the past 20 years, the nature of cooperation has CLEAN ENERGY ECONOMICACTION GROWTH AND INFRASTRUCTUREBELOW WATER INEQUALITIESON LAND ANDAND COMMUNITIES STRONG CONSUMPTIONFOR THE GOALS evolved from humanitarian assistance from the Czech INSTITUTIONS AND PRODUCTION Republic through post-war reconstruction to the current scheme to support the stability and successful ICONS 48 ICONS 48 integrationICONS of Bosnia and Herzegovina into the CLIMATE LIFE LIFE PEACE, JUSTICE PARTNERSHIPS EconomicACTION When an icongrowth is onBELOW a square, WATER thatwith square mustONemphasis LAND be proportional 1 x 1. ANDon STRONG energyFOR THEfrom GOALS ICONS INSTITUTIONS European -
Science-Technology Park Ilidža As a Generator of Innovation Potential and SME’S Development in Bosnia and Herzegovina
ISSN 2303-4521 PERIODICALS OF ENGINEERING AND NATURAL SCIENCES Vol. 1 No. 2 (2013) Available online at: http://pen.ius.edu.ba Science-Technology Park Ilidža as a Generator of Innovation Potential and SME’s Development in Bosnia and Herzegovina Darko Petković Hazim Bašić Benjamin Duraković Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Faculty of Mechanical Engineering International University Sarajevo University of Zenica University of Sarajevo Faculty of Engineering [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Sanja Prodanović Faculty of Economics East Sarajevo University of East Sarajevo [email protected] Abstract Many nations are currently adopting a variety of directed strategies to launch and support the development of research parks. Science and technology research parks are seen increasingly as a means to create dynamic clusters that accelerate economic growth and international competitiveness. Technology parks represent the place of SME's development and the place of the most direct technological transfer. Research parks encourage greater collaboration among universities, research laboratories, and SMEs, providing a means to help convert new ideas into the innovative technologies for the market. They are recognized to be a tool to create successful new companies, sustain them and attract new ones, especially in the science, technology, and innovation sector. Universities, in turn, benefit by exposure to the business world. What all these parks have in common is that they are, at heart, knowledge partnerships that foster innovation. University research and science parks provide the launch pad that startup companies need when they are "spun out" from a university or company. The current state of development of technology parks in Bosnia and Herzegovina and possibilities of establishment of a new technology park in Sarajevo (Ilidža) region are analyzed in this paper. -
Bosnia and Herzegovina: Attitudes on Violent Extremism and Foreign Influence
Bosnia and Herzegovina: Attitudes on Violent Extremism and Foreign Influence January 4 - February 3, 2017 Detailed Methodology • The survey was conducted by Ipsos in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) on behalf of the International Republican Institute’s Center for Insights and Survey Research, and was funded by the National Endowment for Democracy. • Data was collected between January 4 and February 3, 2017 through face-to-face interviews at the respondents’ homes using the CAPI method (computer assisted personal interviewing). • A total of 1,537 interviews were completed, with an overall margin of error of plus or minus 2.5 percent at the midrange of the 95 percent confidence level. A nationally-representative sample was assembled based on a multistage stratification proportionate to population sample distribution, through the random selection of households and respondents. • The sample is composed of citizens of BiH, aged 18 and older and was based on the 2013 Census; Vital Statistics 2012 and Ipsos estimations derived from the Central Election Commission database; Agency for Identification Documents; and the Registers and Data Exchange of Bosnia and Herzegovina database. • The sampling frame consisted of polling station territories (approximate size of census units) within strata defined by municipalities and type of settlements (urban and rural). Polling station territories enable the most reliable sample selection, due to the fact that these units represent the most comprehensive and up-to-date data available. • Households were selected according to the random route technique. Starting from a given address, interviewers selected the third house down the same side of the street or the next available house for an interview from the starting point. -
Never Again: International Intervention in Bosnia and Herzegovina1
Never again: 1 International intervention in Bosnia and Herzegovina July 2017 David Harland2 1 This study is one of a series commissioned as part of an ongoing UK Government Stabilisation Unit project relating to elite bargains and political deals. The project is exploring how national and international interventions have and have not been effective in fostering and sustaining political deals and elite bargains; and whether or not these political deals and elite bargains have helped reduce violence, increased local, regional and national stability and contributed to the strengthening of the relevant political settlement. This is a 'working paper' and the views contained within do not necessarily represent those of HMG. 2 Dr David Harland is Executive Director of the Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue. He served as a witness for the Prosecution at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia in the cases of The Prosecutor versus Slobodan Milošević, The Prosecutor versus Radovan Karadžić, The Prosecutor versus Ratko Mladić, and others. Executive summary The war in Bosnia and Herzegovina was the most violent of the conflicts which accompanied the break- up of Yugoslavia, and this paper explores international engagement with that war, including the process that led to the signing of the Dayton Peace Agreement. Sarajevo and Srebrenica remain iconic symbols of international failure to prevent and end violent conflict, even in a small country in Europe. They are seen as monuments to the "humiliation" of Europe and the UN and the -
The Influence of External Actors in the Western Balkans
The influence of external actors in the Western Balkans A map of geopolitical players www.kas.de Impressum Contact: Florian C. Feyerabend Desk Officer for Southeast Europe/Western Balkans European and International Cooperation Europe/North America team Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V. Phone: +49 30 26996-3539 E-mail: [email protected] Published by: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e. V. 2018, Sankt Augustin/Berlin Maps: kartoxjm, fotolia Design: yellow too, Pasiek Horntrich GbR Typesetting: Janine Höhle, Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V. Diese Publikation ist/DThe text of this publication is published under a Creative Commons license: “Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 international” (CC BY-SA 4.0), https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-sa/4.0/legalcode. ISBN 978-3-95721-471-3 Contents Introduction: The role of external actors in the Western Balkans 4 Albania 9 Bosnia and Herzegovina 14 Kosovo 17 Croatia 21 Macedonia 25 Romania 29 Serbia and Montenegro 32 The geopolitical context 39 3 Introduction: The role of external actors in the Western Balkans by Dr Lars Hänsel and Florian C. Feyerabend Dear readers, A spectre haunts the Western Balkans – the spec- consists of reports from our representatives in the tre of geopolitics. Once again, the region is at risk various countries involved. Along with the non-EU of becoming a geostrategic chessboard for exter- countries in the Western Balkans, this study also nal actors. Warnings are increasingly being voiced considers the situation in Croatia and Romania. in Brussels and other Western capitals, as well as in the region itself. Russia, China, Turkey and the One thing is clear: the integration of the Western Gulf States are ramping up their political, eco- Balkans into Euro-Atlantic and European struc- nomic and cultural influence in this enclave within tures is already well advanced, with close ties and the European Union – with a variety of resources, interdependencies. -
Serbia (Srbija), Montenegro (Crna Gora) and Bosnia and Herzegovina (Bosna I Hercegovina)
Serbia (Srbija), Montenegro (Crna Gora) and Bosnia and Herzegovina (Bosna i Hercegovina) Recent history Serbia, Montenegro and Bosnia and Herzegovina (BIH) were all (along with Croatia and FYR Macedonia) formed as a result of the break-up of Yugoslavia in the 1990s. BIH declared its independence from Yugoslavia in 1992, following a referendum. This break-up sparked conflict among the three large ethnic groups within the federation. Bosniaks and Croats generally favoured independence, whereas Bosnian Serbs, supported by the Serbian government, wished for a union with Serbia. Further conflict later erupted between the Croat statelet of Herzog-Bosnia and the Bosniaks. The wars lasted until the intervention of NATO and the signing of the Dayton Accords in 1995, by which time an estimated 100,000 people had been killed, many in acts of ethnic cleansing. Under the Dayton Accords, BIH was administratively decentralised and divided into two entities, the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Republika Srpska. Central government is consociational, with three rotating Presidents and set numbers of seats in both Houses of the Parliamentary Assembly for Croats, Bosniaks and Serbs. After the dissolution of Yugoslavia,How Serbia does did maintaina General a federation Election with Montenegro. actually However, work? this gradually evolved into a looser relationship, and Montenegrins narrowly voted for independence from Serbia in May 2006. Montenegro The UK is a liberal democracy. This means that we democratically elect politicians, who is now recognised as a separate nation by both Serbia and the EU. represent our interests. It also involves that individual rights are protected. Much more problematic has been Serbia’s relationship with Kosovo, which has a majority (90%) ethnic Albanian population. -
BOSNIA and HERZEGOVINA Copyright © UNDP 2009, All Rights Reserved
ASSESSMENT OF DEVELOPMENT RESULTSBOSNIA AND EVALUATION OF UNDP CONTRIBUTION HerZEGovina Evaluation Office, May 2009 United Nations Development Programme REPORTS PUBLISHED UNDER THE ADR SERIES Afghanistan Jamaica Argentina Jordan Bangladesh Lao PDR Barbados Montenegro Benin Mozambique Bhutan Nicaragua Bosnia & Herzegovina Nigeria Botswana Rwanda Bulgaria Serbia China Sudan Colombia Syrian Arab Republic Republic of the Congo Tajikistan Egypt Ukraine Ethiopia Uzbekistan Guatemala Turkey Honduras Viet Nam India Yemen EVALUATION TEAM Team Leader Evelyn Bazalgette Team Members Alain Thery Ozren Runic EO Task Manager and Team Member Vijayalakshmi Vadivelu EO Research Assistant Tega Shivute ASSESSMENT OF DEVELOPMENT RESULTS: BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Copyright © UNDP 2009, all rights reserved. Manufactured in the United States of America. Printed on recycled paper. The analysis and recommendations of this report do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations Development Programme, its Executive Board or the United Nations Member States. This is an independent publication by UNDP and reflects the views of its authors. Design: Green Communication Design inc. FOREWORD The Evaluation Office of the United Nations faces numerous challenges, including tackling Development Programme (UNDP) conducts poverty, reducing unemployment, strengthening independent evaluations of UNDP contributions the capacities of public management institu- to development results through its country pro- tions, controlling fiscal deficit and harmonizing grammes. These evaluations are titled Assessment complex administrative structures. of Development Results (ADR). An ADR evalu- ates the relevance and strategic positioning of The international community, including the UNDP support and contributions to a coun- various UN agencies, have played an important try’s development over a specified period of role in the country’s reconstruction and develop- time. -
Novi Grad Sarajevo Sarajevo MN MAC
BUSINESS FRIENDLY MUNICIPALITY SOUTH EAST EUROPE CRO Novi Grad BiH SER Novi Grad Sarajevo Sarajevo MN www.novigradsarajevo.ba MAC Location Bosnia and Herzegovina, 43°84’N 18°37’E Border Crossings Montenegro (68 km), Croatia (102) Population 130.000 Territory 47,8 km²; 44,5% arable land, 26,4% forests, 29,1% roads and other Budget € 19,5 million, 46% of capital investments Contact Bulevar Meše Selmovića 97, 71.000 Sarajevo, +387 33 291 100, [email protected] is the most populated municipality in BiH and the Novi Grad Sarajevo Vienna (774 km) “entrance gate” to Sarajevo from Corridor Vc. Being in close proximity to the international airport in Sarajevo, Corridor Vc and international Budapest (551 km) sea ports in the Mediterranean, Novi Grad Sarajevo holds a highly favorable geographic position, with easy access to local and regional Zagreb markets. With continuous investments in infrastructure and capital (401 km) investments reaching the value of more than 50% of its annual budget, the municipality stands out as a modern and favorable place for living and doing business. Educated, qualified and young workforce, fully Belgrade (344 km) equipped industrial and business zones and local incentives strongly Milan recommend Novi Grad Sarajevo as an investment location. The (1.028 km) municipality has already welcomed investors in traditional and new industries such as automotive, chemical, processing, food, and ICT. The local community has been recording continuous progress in terms Sofia (583 km) of construction due to its vast spatial potentials and a vivid business, NOVI GRAD Istanbul cultural and tourism scene, being surrounded by four mountains. -
EMERGENCY RESPONSE to COVID-19 in Mixed Migration Context in Bosnia and Herzegovina
EMERGENCY RESPONSE TO COVID-19 in Mixed Migration Context in Bosnia and Herzegovina SITUATION REPORT #48 / 22 March 2021 Reporting Period: 09/03 – 22/03/2021 http://drc.ba/covid19_resources BIWEEKLY HIGHLIGHTS UPDATES: 154,627 cases of COVID-19 confirmed in BiH, 5,938 deaths and 125,343 recovered patients.1 96 PoCs exhibiting 96 PoCs exhibiting COVID-19-like symptoms monitored by PHC and DRC medical symptoms and teams in TRC Blazuj (9), TRC Miral (15), TRC Sedra (2) and TRC Borici (70). isolated in reception facilities 53 positive PoCs isolated and monitored by PHC and DRC medical teams in TRC Borici (45), TRC Miral (5) and TRC Blazuj (3). 1,351 PoCs 103 new PoCs exhibiting COVID-19-like symptoms referred to symptomatic screened in isolation in reception centers: 20 in TRC Miral, 6 in TRC Sedra, 48 in TRC Borici, 8 in reception facilities TRC Usivak and 21 in TRC Blazuj. 276 PoCs referred to preventive isolation in reception facilities. 44 new PoCs confirmed positive 1,351 PoCs screened for COVID-19 symptoms: 1,008 new arrivals to temporary for COVID-19 reception facilities in BiH during the reporting period; 343 already accommodated individuals experiencing symptoms. CUMULATIVE: 57 PoCs monitored in preventive isolation by DRC Medical Officers (13 in TRC Miral 89 PoCs positive and 44 in TRC Sedra). for COVID-19 240 PoCs tested for COVID-19. Out of 240, 44 results confirmed positive. 67,500 COVID- 19 screenings in KEY DEVELOPMENTS AND CHALLENGES reception facilities and in out-of-site Following the rise in COVID-19 cases among PoCs accommodated in TRC Borici, a locations blanket PCR testing was performed for the entire population of this center. -
BOSNIA and HERZEGOVINA on Its European Path #Euenlargement
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA on its European path #EUenlargement Trade & Mobility & 09/2021 investment empowerment Key milestones ● The EU is Bosnia and Herzegovina’s ● Visa-free travel to the EU since December biggest trading partner 2010 ● The EU’s Foreign Direct Investment ● Over 12,169 participants from Bosnia Last updated: JULY 2008 in Bosnia and Herzegovina reached and Herzegovina in student, academic €228 million in 2020 In 2020 and youth exchanges under ERASMUS+ Signature of the Stabilisation and ● Volume of trade in goods (2014-2020) Association Agreement with the EU was €9.6 72% ● €35.15 million in support to civil society & entry into force of the billion in 2020 in exports (2014-2020) Interim Agreement on 61% trade in imports Supporting DECEMBER 2010 EU funding transformation Entry into force of visa liberalisation ● The EU is the largest provider ● Strengthening democracy: rule of law, of financial assistance to Bosnia and justice and fundamental rights Herzegovina ● Reforming public administration ● €1.19 billion in EU pre-accession funds ● Fostering competitiveness and supporting JUNE 2015 (2007-2020) business development Entry into force of ● €2.4 billion in loans from European ● Working towards a cleaner environment the Stabilisation and Investment Bank since 1999 and safer food supply Association Agreement ● €284.3 million provided since 2009 in Western Balkans Investment Framework Support grants, to leverage investments of 9% for key estimated €3.6 billion FEBRUARY 2016 23% sectors Bosnia and Herzegovina submits EU membership