DOCSLIB.ORG

OLA Quarterly

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

OLA Quarterly Industrializing the Work Flow: New Trends in Technical Services In This Issue Beyond MARC: New Trends for the Library of the Future The Craft of Local Practice: How Catalogers are Gaining Efficiency but Losing Control Authority Control is Alive and … Well? Handcrafted or Mass Produced: What are You Willing to Pay and What is it Worth? I am Cataloger—Hear Me Roar Dressing the Part … Training—the Missing Step in the Industrialization of Technical Services OLAQSpring Vol • No " OLA Quarterly Oregon Library Association Spring 2003 http://www.olaweb.org Vol 9 • No 1 ISSN 1093-7374 The OLA Quarterly is an Industrializing the Work Flow: official publication of the Oregon Library Association. New Trends in Technical Services Please refer questions and input regarding the Quarterly to: Table of Contents Fred R. Reenstjerna OLA Publications Chair Beyond MARC: Douglas County Library New Trends for the Library of the Future Bessie Mayes 1409 NE Diamond Lake Blvd. Roseburg, OR 97470 6 phone 541-440-6007 The Craft of Local Practice: fax 541-440-4317 How Catalogers are Gaining Efficiency but Losing Control [email protected] Lloyd Jansen Graphic Production: Tobias Weiss Design Authority Control is Alive and … Well? 7345 SW Deerhaven Drive Richard V. Jackson Corvallis, OR 97333 " phone 541-738-1897 Handcrafted or Mass Produced: fax 541-738-1897 What are You Willing to Pay and What is it Worth? [email protected] Gary Houk and Alane Wilson "7 I am Cataloger—Hear Me Roar Mary T. Kalnin Dressing the Part … Upcoming Nelia C. Wurangian-Caan Issues 8 Training—the Missing Step in the Industrialization of Technical Services Summer 2003 Deborah Fritz OLA President-elect’s Issue: Diversity in the Profession 9 Fall 2003 An Exchange on: Life with the USA PATRIOT Act Energizing Young Cohn Swales, Robert Truman, Ronnie Lee Budge, Adult Services Fred Reenstjerna, and Anna Grzeszkiewicz Editorial elcome to Oregon, military library, cataloging “the Arizona, to New York, implores us not now let me figure essence of volumetric technology … to give up on standards in our haste to “W out a way to put you (as in) one submarine looking at give the “average Joe/Jane” what s/he to good use!” That’s pretty much how another submarine hiding behind an wants. And my favorite Canadian Fred Reenstjerna greeted me at last iceberg.” Let me welcome Richard colleague, Trina Grover, insists the craft year’s Oregon/Washington Library Jackson, who once challenged me to of cataloging can live in harmony with Association Conference. I think that articulate the value of PromptCat to a the technological tools that ease the was because, after the initial introduc- library school class and is now the process. Daniel CannCasciato, a NACO tions, Fred and I discovered that we Catalog Librarian/Database Manager trainer, insists we really belong in both shared a passion for libraries as at the prestigious Huntington Library. “public” or “patron,” rather than well as a determination that technical Then there is Lloyd Jansen who writes “technical” services. Two librarians I services managers use their wealth of eloquently about his struggle to carry met in my own seminars have unique human resources in the most cost- on his mentor’s high cataloging perspectives about technical services effective manner. From our shared standards while coping within current from their managerial point of view. history on the front lines of a catalog- economic realities. Sharon Walbridge sees cataloging as a ing unit, as filtered through our How could we not include a hybrid activity—“part productivity and different employment perspectives, we spokesperson from a bibliographic part intellectual process,” Felicia Uhden think we have put together a remark- utility in this theme issue? Gary Houk believes there could be something able release for the Spring 2003 issue. and Alane Wilson, whom I know more. The woman who once told me All of the authors are people with from her years as OCLC’s library she considered the MARC record the whom I’ve had personal contact in consultant in the northwest, provides “finest creation of human beings” takes my professional activities. Each of an authoritative look at its past and us into the future with an OPAC that them made such a positive impres- future plans. Mary Kalnin shares how blends the “art” with the “science,” and sion on me that I could hardly wait to she takes advantage of OCLC’s more maybe even a bit of “magic.” Finally, challenge them to share their views sophisticated interfaces at the Univer- Oregon’s own outspoken public about the changing nature of the sity of Washington. Since I know librarian, Fred Reenstjerna, insists, cataloging process. In fact, out of the Mary as the listowner of LIBSUP-L, an “There’s no magic in the drinking water twenty-three prospective contributors electronic discussion list for library in Dublin, Ohio, that turns people into I contacted last August, we are support staff, I would expect no less Super Librarians.” Fred’s lively com- overjoyed with thirteen completed from this early-adopter of new mentary asks why managers have articles. I view it as a remarkable technology. I know Deborah Fritz as turned technical services “into a pre- testament to the ability of busy an excellent cataloging instructor industrial cottage industry” rather than people to get the job done! traveling throughout the U.S. as well Eli Whitney’s “American factory sys- One of the busiest people I know as a small businesswoman who has tem.” You won’t want to miss any of it! is Nelia Wurangian-Caan. At many invented new employment opportuni- We hope you will enjoy these library events she is the center of ties for librarians. She begs us not to stimulating essays, in print and on the organizational action—yet her forget the training component in our Web, at http://www.olaweb.org/ thought-provoking essay shows she rush to embrace technology and quarterly has time to imagine a public catalog increase productivity. that can “walk or talk or sing.” I am As a bonus, the electronic version proud to introduce Bessie Mayes, of this issue of OLAQ will present six —Joy A. Wanden who shared her vision of creating a additional articles that simply would not Library Analyst conference for library paraprofession- fit within the limitations of this print OCLC Western Service Center als in San Diego back in the early journal. “Maggie” Horn, whose career I [email protected] 1990s and is now, in her role in a have followed from California, to Guest Editor OLAQ 1 Beyond MARC: New Trends for the Library of the Future by Bessie Mayes Introduction from HGML and SGML, and is better suited Senior Cataloger It is vitally important that the library to describe the attributes of the technologi- and Map Specialist profession keep pace with new technolo- cal offerings of the private sector, colleges, gies being developed for the public by hospitals, and institutions. XML is exten- Technical Research Library industries across the world. The library has sible, interoperable with other ML lan- Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center, San Diego to adapt to changing trends and life-style guages, and its use has opened the collec- issues. Some changes may necessitate a tions of libraries across the world for [email protected] different approach to the traditional roles viewing, unlike a unique program or stand- and methods of operation. Most libraries alone application could. are meeting a host of challenges presented by industries and new technologies, and X-MARCs the Spot are incorporating new ideas into the My attention was first drawn to XML when I profession to better serve their clients. The began to read e-mails on AUTOCAT discuss- influence of recent industrial changes has ing the concept of using XML languages to resulted in some libraries experiencing replace the traditional MARC language. XML change in their methods of operating. advocates argued for the new language and For example, some functions of the opportunity it provided to be more technical services are being outsourced to descriptive with the emerging technology private businesses. Some libraries find and resources. Those opposed to XML outsourcing easier and more cost effective proposed that traditional MARC could be than hiring personnel to perform these modified to accommodate the ever-changing traditionally held functions. Another data formats or electronic resources. MARC profound change that has already affected was also considered to have a proven track how libraries operate as service providers record, whereas no one knew if XML would is the change in how they present and work well with established rules and describe content. MARC, once the tradi- procedures that had been a part of library tional language of choice for libraries in tradition for some time. After much research describing format and content, is now on XML, my conclusion is that both sides being questioned as to its relevance. As a are correct. library-specific language, it lacked interoperability with other more modern And the winner is … languages used on the Internet such as While attending the American Library Cata- HTML, SGML, and XML. MARC’s inability loging and Metadata Institute conference in to be offered as an industry-wide standard Washington DC, in November 2002, one of was cause for concern among vendors that the presenters commented that “Dublin Core historically provided service to libraries. is so yesterday news.“ Dublin Core was Unlike MARC, however, XML is derived OCLC’s first attempt at migration from MARC to an extensible markup language. However, with formal standardization of Dublin Core- XML, OCLC had taken the next step in accommodating a broader industry in a rapidly expanding market in format language MARC once the traditional on the Web.
Recommended publications
  • Information Management in Communication 1

    Information Management in Communication 1

    Information Management in Communication 1 Information Management in Communication CONTENTS Part I: Documentation science as a field of study: Information sources and documentary search I. Overloaded with information 1. Preliminary Considerations 2. Documentation science as a field of study 3. A Brief History of Documentation 3.1. Antiquity 3.1.1. Asia Minor: 1900-1200 BC – “Catalogues” 3.1.2. The Library of Alexandria –3rd century BC 3.1.3. Public Libraries – 27 AD 3.2. Middle Ages 3.2.1. Monasteries and universities as book custodians – 476 AD - 14th-15th centuries 3.2.2. Gutenberg’s invention of the printing press – mid-1400s 3.3. Early Modern Period 3.3.1. 17th century – first scientific journal – Journal de Savants 3.4. Late Modern Period 3.4.1. Documentation as a scientific field of study 3.4.2. The Universal Bibliographic Repertory 3.4.3. Traité de documentation: le livre sur le livre, théorie et practique (1934) 3.4.4. Ortega y Gasset “The Mission of the Librarian” (1934) 4. Information Sources: Concept and Typology 4.1. Primary information sources 4.2. Secondary information sources 4.3. Tertiary information sources 5. The process of managing documentary information 5.1. Concept 5.2. Stages 5.2.1. Entry 5.2.2. Processing information 5.2.2.1. Formal analysis: 5.2.2.1.1. Bibliographical description 5.2.2.2. Content analysis: 5.2.2.2.1. Indexing 5.2.2.2.2. Writing an Abstract 5.2.2.2.3. The Dublin Core – Metadata Initiative 5.2.3. Dissemination 2 Information Management in Communication II.
  • BIBFRAME at the George Washington University, an Early Experimenter

    BIBFRAME at the George Washington University, an Early Experimenter

    ARTICLE RDF EXCERPTED FROM: INFORMATION STANDARDS QUARTERLY WEB WINTER 2013 | VOL 25 | ISSUE 4 | ISSN 1041-0031 MARC 21 BIBFRAME TOPIC EVOLUTION OF BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATA EXCHANGE AUTHORITY ARE CURRENT BIBLIOGRAPHIC MODELS SUITABLE FOR INTEGRATION WITH THE WEB? A TRANSFORMATIVE OPPORTUNITY: BIBFRAME AT GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY, AN EARLY EXPERIMENTER INTERVIEW WITH GILDAS ILLIEN , BnF SCHEMA BIB EXTEND AUTHOR ANNOTATION 17 IP[ IN PRACTICE ] A Transformative Opportunity: BIBFRAME at the George Washington University, an Early Experimenter JACKIE SHIEH The century’s old tradition of the library’s mission continues to resonate in the information profession, even in today’s fast-moving development of mobile technology.1 The centrality of this mission is indisputably integral to the user’s research experience. In the last two decades, information professionals have been structures, both physical and virtual. For practitioners— under pressure to remain relevant in the world of web data.2 in this case, cataloging professionals—to begin working Information professionals, in particular those who provide in this new environment, a change in their understanding bibliographic description, have had to rethink and retrain of the anatomy of a record must occur. A record consists themselves in the face of a new data service model for the of various components—author, title, publisher, physical records that they create and curate. description, etc. To think and work with each component as Library communities initiated several projects that data instead of text strings is the basis of the revolution. Data attempted to respond to the shifting information landscape can be recognized by machine methods, and connections and remain relevant to their mission.3 On May 13, 2011, the between data can be made among any resources containing Library of Congress (LC) issued a statement on transforming an identifier.
  • Tesi Dottorato Turbanti

    Tesi Dottorato Turbanti

    DIPARTIMENTO DI SCIENZE DOCUMENTARIE, LINGUISTICO-FILOLOGICHE E GEOGRAFICHE DOTTORATO DI RICERCA IN SCIENZE DOCUMENTARIE, LINGUISTICHE E LETTERARIE CURRICULUM IN SCIENZE LIBRARIE E DOCUMENTARIE COORDINATORE: PROF. ALBERTO PETRUCCIANI Internazionalizzazione e vitalità degli studi italiani nelle discipline del libro e del documento: analisi critica e sperimentazione di strumenti bibliometrici DOTTORANDO Simona Turbanti TUTOR CO-TUTOR Prof. Giovanni Di Domenico Prof. Giovanni Solimine INDICE CAPITOLO 1 – LA VITALITA’ DI UNA DISCIPLINA SCIENTIFICA 1.1 L’oggetto, il percorso e l’articolazione della ricerca p. 5 1.2 Il processo della comunicazione scientifica p. 8 1.3 Il livello di internazionalizzazione di una disciplina scientifica p. 12 1.4 La citazione, la citation culture e la nascita della bibliometria p. 15 1.5 Le finalità, gli oggetti e i metodi della valutazione p. 20 1.6 Le scienze umane e sociali e la loro valutazione p. 29 1.7 Altri mezzi di indagine p. 34 CAPITOLO 2 – UNA RASSEGNA CRITICA DELLA BIBLIOGRAFIA 2.1 La letteratura scientifica esistente in ambito bibliometrico p. 35 2.2 Ambiti e limiti delle indagini condotte nell’ambito della Library and information science p. 38 2.3 Le ultime tendenze della letteratura scientifica p. 46 CAPITOLO 3 – LA RICERCA NEI DATABASE CITAZIONALI: UNA RISORSA O UNA FALSA PISTA? 3.1 Le fonti utilizzate p. 48 3.2 Il metodo seguito p. 57 3.3 I limiti riscontrati p. 59 3.4 I risultati e il loro significato p. 62 3.5 Alcune analisi di dettaglio p. 65 3.6 Un tentativo di confronto con altri 2 settori disciplinari p.
  • RDA, BIBFRAME, and the FRBR Library Reference Model The

    RDA, BIBFRAME, and the FRBR Library Reference Model The

    Where Are We Headed? RDA, BIBFRAME, and the FRBR Library Reference Model The technical services world is in a state of chaotic transformation at this moment, and undoubtedly librarians are feeling the growing pains. Three major initiatives in the cataloging field are driving the revolution, and their adoption will mean big changes in the way that catalogers and metadata specialists approach their work. Given the many projects, models, and papers being disseminated and discussed within the library community, the question becomes, what will library cataloging and metadata creation look like in the next decade? Where are we headed? And what knowledge and skills will we need to function in this increasingly digital and mechanized world? The metadata and data management initiatives that are currently being developed, both in and outside the library realm, are numerous, but at the moment three large projects are currently underway that have the potential to be the most transformative for those providing metadata and cataloging services in libraries. The first is the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA)’s Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) Library Reference Model (FRBR LRM) (Riva, Le Bœuf and Žumer, 2016) which seeks to harmonize the various FRBR models into one. The second is the ongoing development and reworking of Resource Description and Access (RDA), the set of rules used to standardize bibliographic description for world-wide access and sharing (RDA, 2010). The third is BIBFRAME, an encoding system which will eventually (probably?) replace the current MAchine-Readable Cataloging (MARC) record as the fundamental repository for bibliographic data (Library of Congress Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative, 2012a).
  • Japanese Bibliographic Records and CJK Cataloging in U.S

    Japanese Bibliographic Records and CJK Cataloging in U.S

    San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Master's Theses Master's Theses and Graduate Research Fall 2009 Japanese bibliographic records and CJK cataloging in U.S. university libraries. Mie Onnagawa San Jose State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses Recommended Citation Onnagawa, Mie, "Japanese bibliographic records and CJK cataloging in U.S. university libraries." (2009). Master's Theses. 4010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31979/etd.pcb8-mryq https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses/4010 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Master's Theses and Graduate Research at SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JAPANESE BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORDS AND CJK CATALOGING IN U.S. UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the School of Library and Information Science San Jose State University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Library and Information Science by Mie Onnagawa December 2009 UMI Number: 1484368 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMT Dissertation Publishing UM! 1484368 Copyright 2010 by ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This edition of the work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code.
  • On the Record: Report of the Library of Congress Working Group on The

    On the Record: Report of the Library of Congress Working Group on The

    OOnn tthhee RReeccoorrdd __________________________________________________________________________ Report of The Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control January 9, 2008 WORKING GROUP ON THE FUTURE OF BIBLIOGRAPHIC CONTROL Richard Amelung John Latham Associate Director Director, Information Center Omer Poos Law Library Special Libraries Association Saint Louis University Clifford Lynch Diane Boehr Executive Director Head, Cataloging Section Coalition for Networked Information Technical Services Division Olivia M. A. Madison (Co-Chair) National Library of Medicine Dean of the Library Diane Dates Casey Iowa State University Dean of Library Services and Judith Nadler Academic Computing Director and University Librarian Governors State University University of Chicago Library Daniel Clancy Brian E. C. Schottlaender (Co-Editor) Engineering Director The Audrey Geisel University Librarian Google University of California, San Diego Christopher Cole Sally Smith Associate Director, Technical Services Manager of Cataloging and Processing National Agricultural Library King County Library System Lorcan Dempsey Seattle, WA Vice President, Programs and Research, Robert Wolven and Chief Strategist Associate University Librarian for OCLC, Inc. Bibliographic Services and Jay Girotto Collection Development Windows Live Search Columbia University Group Program Manager Microsoft Corporation Project Consultants José-Marie Griffiths (Co-Chair) Karen Coyle Dean and Professor Library Consultant School of Information and Library
  • ACRL News Issue (B) of College & Research Libraries

    ACRL News Issue (B) of College & Research Libraries

    Personnel During the summer just past, Frederick G. frequent contributor of scholarly articles to Kilgour became the director of the newly- various learned journals. created Ohio College Library Center. Though Fred’s interest in the history of ideas never a librarian for more blinded him to the imaginative exploration of than thirty years be­ new ideas, nor to new uses for old ideas. His fore accepting the di­ interest in the world of computors has not been rectorship, in many antithetical to his interest in ancient technology; ways this move was a rather, the two are bands on an open-ended step in a new career spectrum. The one informs the other; they both which began in 1965 inform Fred Kilgour; and Fred informs those when Fred left Yale’s of us who are laboring to bring libraries into medical library for the the present and on into the future.—James post of associate li­ Tanis, Yale University. brarian for research and development in Kenneth E. Toombs, director of libraries Yale’s university li­ and professor of library science at the Univer­ Mr. Kilgour brary. sity of Southwestern Louisiana, was appointed Actually, Fred had director of libraries at been preparing for this shift for many years. the University of During his last years at the medical library he South Carolina effec­ increasingly gave his time to those aspects of tive September 1. library development which are frequently sub­ Toombs, a native of sumed under the catch-all term of “automa­ Colonial Heights, Vir­ tion.” Fred’s interest in automation, however, ginia, had been at like his interest in medicine and in science S outhw estern since generally, was predicated upon humanistic pre­ 1963.
  • The Ohio College Library Center: an Overview. Report No. 1. INSTITUTION Michigan Library Consortium, Detroit

    The Ohio College Library Center: an Overview. Report No. 1. INSTITUTION Michigan Library Consortium, Detroit

    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 111 376 IR 002 430 AUTHOR Schoenung, James G. TITLE The Ohio College Library Center: An Overview. Report No. 1. INSTITUTION Michigan Library Consortium, Detroit. PUB DATE Jan 74 NOTE 47p.; :or related documents see IR 002 431 and 432 EDRS PRICE MF-$0.76 HC-$1.95 Plus Postage DESCRIPTORS *Cataloging; College Libraries; Costs; DataBases; Interlibrary Loans; *Library Automation; Library Cooperation; *Library Networks; Library Technical Processes; *On Line Systems; Program Descriptions; Regional Libraries; *Shared Services; Union Catalogs IDENTIFIERS OCLC; *Ohio College Library Center ABSTRACT The Ohio College Library Center (OCLC) isa nonprofit computerized library processing center operatingout of Columbus, Ohio. Six years after its incorporation, OCLC isnow mainly in the business of operating a shared catalogingsystem and producing catalog cards designed to meet the needs of eachof its member libraries. OCLC also maintainsa union catalog of its member libraries as a byproduct of this service.Its data base crows at the rate of about 1,000 records per day, both Library ofCongress (LC) MARC records and the original cataloging done bymember libraries. Catalogers in OCLC's member libraries, using theircomputer display terminals, can call up records in catalog cardformat by imputing LC number, author, or title. Recordscan be modified online to meet local needs. This report further describesOCLC in terms of the basic cataloging process, the system's advantages anddisadvantages, and the costs to and responsibilities of participating libraries. Appendixes outline planned OCLC subsystems andLC's MARC and RECON projects. Sample OCLC printouts are included. (Author/SL) *********************************************************************** Documents acquired by ERIC include many informal unpublished * materials not available from othersources.
  • 2004 Spring Issue

    2004 Spring Issue

    Inside this Issue Trapped in a tower with no door . Dean’s Message ...................................... 2 Children’s book illustrator and Caldecott Medalist Faculty News ............................................ 6 Paul O. Zelinsky brings Rapunzel and other stories Student News ......................................... 10 to life. The featured lecturer discussed his artistic Alumni President’s Message............. 13 process and shared a few sketches. Story, Page 8. Alumni Updates ..................................... 14 INFORMATION AND LIBRARY SCIENCE @ The SCHOOL of INFORMATION and LIBRARY SCIENCE • The UNIVERSITYCa of NORTH CAROLINArolina at CHAPEL HILL SPRING 2004 www.ils.unc.edu Number 64 SURPRISE! A lifetime achievement award and $100,000 birthday gift honor Fred By CHRYS BULLARD UNC-Chapel Hill Dr. Frederick Kilgour Office of Development 1914: Born in Springfield, Mass. 1935: A.B., Harvard College It has been 37 years since 1938: Publishes first scholarly paper Fred Kilgour, retired distin- 1940: Marries Eleanor Beach guished research professor in 1935-42: Harvard College Library the School of Information and 1943-46: Lt., USNR Library Science (SILS), 1942-45: Office of Strategic Services founded the OCLC Online 1948-67: Yale University 1967: Founds OCLC CATHERINE LAZORKO Computer Library Center – the 1971: Creates WorldCat world’s first computerized and 1979: Creates Interlibrary Loan services largest online library network. 1990: Joins SILS faculty Thirty-three years have passed 2004: Publishes scholarly paper No. 205 since he created WorldCat, a digital catalog of library holdings from around the world. Twenty-five “I knew the School of Information and Library Loan Service manages the local, regional and years ago he started the OCLC Interlibrary Loan Science was going to give me a birthday party,” international borrowing and lending of more than Service, exploding the scope of information Kilgour said, “but I didn’t expect anything else.” 7,000 libraries, resource centers and document access.
  • Historical and Current Implications of Cataloguing Quality for Next-Generation Catalogues

    Historical and Current Implications of Cataloguing Quality for Next-Generation Catalogues

    Historical and Current Implications of Cataloguing Quality for Next-Generation Catalogues Barbara Schultz-Jones, Karen Snow, Shawne Miksa, and Richard L. Hasenyager, Jr. Abstract Discussions of quality in library cataloguing are traced from early library science literature to current debates. Three studies that ex- amine dimensions of quality cataloguing in academic libraries, public libraries, and school libraries and a review of vendor processes update the issues surrounding a definition of bibliographic record quality and quality assurance processes. The implications of perceptions of bibliographic record quality on next-generation catalogues are presented with emphasis on the shift in the cataloguer’s judgment from rigid standards for transcription to meeting the requirement for more metadata that matches the user need of find-ability. Introduction Discussions of quality in library cataloguing have been found in library science literature for the past forty years. However, a fresh look at qual- ity cataloguing is needed with the rise in popularity of next-generation catalogues (NGCs). The ability of NGCs to better utilize library data than traditional catalogues has presented the cataloguing community an op- portunity to reassess established notions of “quality” in cataloguing. The concept and philosophy of quality and quality assurances processes may shift as the cataloguing world transitions from Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd edition (AACR2) to the nascent Resource Description and Access (RDA) cataloguing standard (Joint Steering Committee for the Develop- ment of RDA, 2010). Without an understanding of how well current pro- cesses affect library record quality, implementing the new RDA standard and NGCs could replicate or even amplify existing deficiencies in library catalogues.
  • Using Worldcat to Find Items in Libraries

    Using Worldcat to Find Items in Libraries

    Using WorldCat to Find Items in Libraries Background Information In general, libraries are organized by either the Dewey Decimal Classification System or the Library of Congress System. Dewey Decimal Classification System is used in 200,000 libraries in at least 135 countries. Public Libraries and K- 12 School libraries use this system. This system is not a good system as far as genealogy goes. The Library of Congress Classification is used by most research and academic libraries in the U.S. and several other countries. Brigham Young University is a WorldCat library but the Family History Library is not. If you want more in depth information about these two classification systems there are interesting articles on each on Wikipedia.org. From a library patron’s perspective there are problems with just trying to find books by their Dewey Decimal or Library of Congress classification number. The information in the book may span multiple classifications. There may be information in the book about topics other than the main topic. The classifications are done by humans so they may vary from one library to another or even from within the same library, depending on who did the classification. As a result catalogs were created which allowed many entries for a single work. There can be entries for: Author(s) Title and title variations Topics covered in the work Locations covered in the work Etc. Every library developed their own catalog and through the years there have been many catalogs which combined information from more than one library. One of the best known is the National Union Catalog.
  • 124 Erich Meyerhoff: a Man for All Medical Librarians

    124 Erich Meyerhoff: a Man for All Medical Librarians

    124 FESTSCHRIFT DOI: dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2020.873 Erich Meyerhoff: a man for all medical librarians Judith Messerle, AHIP, FMLA; Lucretia W. McClure, AHIP, FMLA See end of article for authors’ affiliations. Erich Meyerhoff—recipient of the Marcia C. Noyes Award, Janet Doe Lecturer, and Fellow—was one of the Medical Library Association’s (MLA’s) most illustrious members who contributed to the welfare of MLA and its members throughout his long life. The authors review his life and significant contributions to the health sciences library profession. Erich was a friend and mentor to countless medical librarians and was truly a man for all medical librarians. For the first time in the history of the Medical Library, Down State Medical Center of the State Library Association (MLA), the Fellows of the University of New York (SUNY) (1957–1961) [2]. association authorized a festschrift to honor one of Things were changing in the medical library its own, Erich Meyerhoff (1919–2015). It is an honor field and in library management in general. As Erich not given lightly. Rather, it speaks to the many ways himself describes in his oral history: in which Erich influenced the association and in particular contributed as a mentor to and example It was a time of great expectations and of active change. It for the well-being and success of members who was a time of subjecting library practices to intense were his colleagues, new and old. He was a friend to scrutiny and the application of rational examinations of every member. library practices, goals and missions.