The Arctic Forest of the Middle Eocene
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Chamaecyparis Lawsoniana: Lawson Falsecypress1 Edward F
ENH313 Chamaecyparis lawsoniana: Lawson Falsecypress1 Edward F. Gilman and Dennis G. Watson2 Introduction General Information Often seen at 40 to 60 feet tall by 15 feet wide in its culti- Scientific name: Chamaecyparis lawsoniana vated form, this North American native can soar to heights Pronunciation: kam-eh-SIP-uh-riss law-so-nee-AY-nuh of 100 to 150 feet in the wild. The massive, thick trunk and Common name(s): Lawson falsecypress, Port Orford cedar formal, upright, conical silhouette is softened by the gently Family: Cupressaceae weeping tips of the short, upright branches. The flattened, USDA hardiness zones: 5B through 7B (Fig. 2) dark blue-green branchlets have a delicate, almost fern-like Origin: native to North America appearance, and are nicely complemented by the rough, Invasive potential: little invasive potential deeply furrowed, reddish-brown bark. Available in a wide Uses: specimen; screen; bonsai variety of forms and bluish foliage colors, Lawson falsecy- Availability: not native to North America press still remains today an important timber trees from the Pacific Northwest. But it is rare in the nursery trade and probably not well adapted to most landscapes. Figure 2. Range Description Height: 40 to 60 feet Spread: 15 to 25 feet Crown uniformity: symmetrical Figure 1. Mature Chamaecyparis lawsoniana: Lawson Falsecypress 1. This document is ENH313, one of a series of the Environmental Horticulture, UF/IFAS Extension. Original publication date November 1993. Reviewed May 2014. Visit the EDIS website at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu. 2. Edward F. Gilman, professor, Environmental Horticulture Department; Dennis G. Watson, former associate professor, Agricultural Engineering Department, UF/IFAS Extension, Gainesville FL 32611. -
Non-Native Trees and Large Shrubs for the Washington, D.C. Area
Green Spring Gardens 4603 Green Spring Rd ● Alexandria ● VA 22312 Phone: 703-642-5173 ● TTY: 703-803-3354 www.fairfaxcounty.gov/parks/greenspring NON - NATIVE TREES AND LARGE SHRUBS FOR THE WASHINGTON, D.C. AREA Non-native trees are some of the most beloved plants in the landscape due to their beauty. In addition, these trees are grown for the shade, screening, structure, and landscape benefits they provide. Deciduous trees, whose leaves die and fall off in the autumn, are valuable additions to landscapes because of their changing interest throughout the year. Evergreen trees are valued for their year-round beauty and shelter for wildlife. Evergreens are often grouped into two categories, broadleaf evergreens and conifers. Broadleaf evergreens have broad, flat leaves. They also may have showy flowers, such as Camellia oleifera (a large shrub), or colorful fruits, such as Nellie R. Stevens holly. Coniferous evergreens either have needle-like foliage, such as the lacebark pine, or scale-like foliage, such as the green giant arborvitae. Conifers do not have true flowers or fruits but bear cones. Though most conifers are evergreen, exceptions exist. Dawn redwood, for example, loses its needles each fall. The following are useful definitions: Cultivar (cv.) - a cultivated variety designated by single quotes, such as ‘Autumn Gold’. A variety (var.) or subspecies (subsp.), in contrast, is found in nature and is a subdivision of a species (a variety of Cedar of Lebanon is listed). Full Shade - the amount of light under a dense deciduous tree canopy or beneath evergreens. Full Sun - at least 6 hours of sun daily. -
Cupressaceae Calocedrus Decurrens Incense Cedar
Cupressaceae Calocedrus decurrens incense cedar Sight ID characteristics • scale leaves lustrous, decurrent, much longer than wide • laterals nearly enclosing facials • seed cone with 3 pairs of scale/bract and one central 11 NOTES AND SKETCHES 12 Cupressaceae Chamaecyparis lawsoniana Port Orford cedar Sight ID characteristics • scale leaves with glaucous bloom • tips of laterals on older stems diverging from branch (not always too obvious) • prominent white “x” pattern on underside of branchlets • globose seed cones with 6-8 peltate cone scales – no boss on apophysis 13 NOTES AND SKETCHES 14 Cupressaceae Chamaecyparis thyoides Atlantic white cedar Sight ID characteristics • branchlets slender, irregularly arranged (not in flattened sprays). • scale leaves blue-green with white margins, glandular on back • laterals with pointed, spreading tips, facials closely appressed • bark fibrous, ash-gray • globose seed cones 1/4, 4-5 scales, apophysis armed with central boss, blue/purple and glaucous when young, maturing in fall to red-brown 15 NOTES AND SKETCHES 16 Cupressaceae Callitropsis nootkatensis Alaska yellow cedar Sight ID characteristics • branchlets very droopy • scale leaves more or less glabrous – little glaucescence • globose seed cones with 6-8 peltate cone scales – prominent boss on apophysis • tips of laterals tightly appressed to stem (mostly) – even on older foliage (not always the best character!) 15 NOTES AND SKETCHES 16 Cupressaceae Taxodium distichum bald cypress Sight ID characteristics • buttressed trunks and knees • leaves -
Chamaecyparis Lawsoniana in Europe: Distribution, Habitat, Usage and Threats
Chamaecyparis lawsoniana Chamaecyparis lawsoniana in Europe: distribution, habitat, usage and threats T. Houston Durrant, G. Caudullo The conifer Lawson cypress (Chamaecyparis lawsoniana (A. Murray) Parl.) is native to a small area in North America. Variable in form, there are over 200 cultivars selected for horticultural purposes. It has been planted in many countries in Europe, usually as an ornamental, although the timber is also of good quality. It has been severely affected in its native range by root rot disease, and this has now spread to the European population. Chamaecyparis lawsoniana (A. Murray) Parl., known as Lawson cypress, or Port Orford cedar in the United States, is a Frequency large conifer native to North America. It belongs to the family < 25% 25% - 50% Cupressaceae, and is sometimes referred to as a “false-cypress” 50% - 75% to distinguish it from other cypresses in the family. It is long- > 75% lived (more than 600 years) and can reach heights of up to 50 m (exceptionally up to 70 m in its native range) and a diameter exceeding 2 m1, 2. The tree is narrowly columnar with slender, down-curving branches; frequently with forked stems. The bark is silvery-brown, becoming furrowed and very thick with age giving mature trees good fire resistance2, 3. The wood is highly aromatic with a distinctive ginger-like odour, as is the foliage which has a parsley-like scent when crushed3, 4. The evergreen scale-like leaves are around 2-3 mm long5. Abundant, round pea-sized cones ripen in autumn with seed dispersal occurring immediately after and continuing until the following spring6. -
Chamaecyparis Obtusa Hinoki Falsecypress1 Edward F
Fact Sheet ST-156 November 1993 Chamaecyparis obtusa Hinoki Falsecypress1 Edward F. Gilman and Dennis G. Watson2 INTRODUCTION This broad, sweeping, conical-shaped evergreen has graceful, flattened, fern-like branchlets which gently droop at branch tips (Fig. 1). Hinoki Falsecypress reaches 50 to 75 feet in height with a spread of 10 to 20 feet, has dark green foliage, and attractive, shredding, reddish-brown bark which peels off in long narrow strips. GENERAL INFORMATION Scientific name: Chamaecyparis obtusa Pronunciation: kam-eh-SIP-uh-riss ob-TOO-suh Common name(s): Hinoki Falsecypress Family: Cupressaceae USDA hardiness zones: 5 through 8A (Fig. 2) Origin: not native to North America Uses: Bonsai; screen Availability: somewhat available, may have to go out of the region to find the tree DESCRIPTION Height: 40 to 75 feet Spread: 10 to 20 feet Crown uniformity: symmetrical canopy with a regular (or smooth) outline, and individuals have more or less identical crown forms Figure 1. Mature Hinoki Falsecypress. Crown shape: pyramidal Crown density: dense Foliage Growth rate: medium Texture: fine Leaf arrangement: opposite/subopposite Leaf type: simple Leaf margin: entire 1. This document is adapted from Fact Sheet ST-156, a series of the Environmental Horticulture Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Publication date: November 1993. 2. Edward F. Gilman, associate professor, Environmental Horticulture Department; Dennis G. Watson, associate professor, Agricultural Engineering Department, Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville FL 32611. Chamaecyparis obtusa -- Hinoki Falsecypress Page 2 Figure 2. Shaded area represents potential planting range. -
Robert L. Christie (1926 Ð 1999)
ARCTIC VOL. 53, NO. 1 (MARCH 2000) P. 88–91 ROBERT L. CHRISTIE (1926 – 1999) Dr. Robert L. Christie, geologist, naturalist, and explorer, suffered a heart attack on his beloved sailboat in the morning of 1 September 1999 and died a few hours later in hospital in Belleville, Ontario. Some weeks earlier, Bob and Audrey had sold their small farm at nearby Madoc, Ontario, and were preparing to move to Gabriola Island in British Columbia, back to Bob’s home province. Bob will be remembered for a broad range of geological achieve- ments in western and Arctic Canada, as well as in Green- land, achievements documented by nearly 100 maps and reports published in scientific journals. He will be espe- cially remembered for his loving warmth, his infectious laughter, and his limitless generosity. Bob was undoubt- edly the kindest and gentlest man I have ever known, and his family and friends were the special delights in his life. During the early sixties, Bob and I camped together for three summers in the Arctic Islands, doing fieldwork for the Geological Survey of Canada. When faced with tough conditions in the field, Bob would harden with stoic endurance. But when the sun shone on our little flycamp, he would rise to a rhapsody, and his cheerful yodel would signal that all was well in our little corner of the vast Arctic wilderness. Bob won distinction for his fieldwork, particularly in the Arctic islands, but he eschewed visible signs of pres- tige, particularly those institutionally accepted ones, like the medals that he had won, which he playfully referred to as “gongs.” He felt that his most genuine rewards came from the sense of community and solidarity developed by working closely with people whose opinions and feelings Robert L. -
The Taxonomic Position and the Scientific Name of the Big Tree Known As Sequoia Gigantea
The Taxonomic Position and the Scientific Name of the Big Tree known as Sequoia gigantea HAROLD ST. JOHN and ROBERT W. KRAUSS l FOR NEARLY A CENTURY it has been cus ing psychological document, but its major,ity tomary to classify the big tree as Sequoia gigan vote does not settle either the taxonomy or tea Dcne., placing it in the same genus with the nomenclature of the big tree. No more the only other living species, Sequoia semper does the fact that "the National Park Service, virens (Lamb.) End!., the redwood. Both the which has almost exclusive custodY of this taxonomic placement and the nomenclature tree, has formally adopted the name Sequoia are now at issue. Buchholz (1939: 536) pro gigantea for it" (Dayton, 1943: 210) settle posed that the big tree be considered a dis the question. tinct genus, and he renamed the tree Sequoia The first issue is the generic status of the dendron giganteum (Lind!.) Buchholz. This trees. Though the two species \differ con dassification was not kindly received. Later, spicuously in foliage and in cone structure, to obtain the consensus of the Calif.ornian these differences have long been generally botanists, Dayton (1943: 209-219) sent them considered ofspecific and notofgeneric value. a questionnaire, then reported on and sum Sequoiadendron, when described by Buchholz, marized their replies. Of the 29 answering, was carefully documented, and his tabular 24 preferred the name Sequoia gigantea. Many comparison contains an impressive total of of the passages quoted show that these were combined generic and specific characters for preferences based on old custom or sentiment, his monotypic genus. -
Vegetation Descriptions NORTH COAST and MONTANE ECOLOGICAL PROVINCE
Vegetation Descriptions NORTH COAST AND MONTANE ECOLOGICAL PROVINCE CALVEG ZONE 1 December 11, 2008 Note: There are three Sections in this zone: Northern California Coast (“Coast”), Northern California Coast Ranges (“Ranges”) and Klamath Mountains (“Mountains”), each with several to many subsections CONIFER FOREST / WOODLAND DF PACIFIC DOUGLAS-FIR ALLIANCE Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) is the dominant overstory conifer over a large area in the Mountains, Coast, and Ranges Sections. This alliance has been mapped at various densities in most subsections of this zone at elevations usually below 5600 feet (1708 m). Sugar Pine (Pinus lambertiana) is a common conifer associate in some areas. Tanoak (Lithocarpus densiflorus var. densiflorus) is the most common hardwood associate on mesic sites towards the west. Along western edges of the Mountains Section, a scattered overstory of Douglas-fir often exists over a continuous Tanoak understory with occasional Madrones (Arbutus menziesii). When Douglas-fir develops a closed-crown overstory, Tanoak may occur in its shrub form (Lithocarpus densiflorus var. echinoides). Canyon Live Oak (Quercus chrysolepis) becomes an important hardwood associate on steeper or drier slopes and those underlain by shallow soils. Black Oak (Q. kelloggii) may often associate with this conifer but usually is not abundant. In addition, any of the following tree species may be sparsely present in Douglas-fir stands: Redwood (Sequoia sempervirens), Ponderosa Pine (Ps ponderosa), Incense Cedar (Calocedrus decurrens), White Fir (Abies concolor), Oregon White Oak (Q garryana), Bigleaf Maple (Acer macrophyllum), California Bay (Umbellifera californica), and Tree Chinquapin (Chrysolepis chrysophylla). The shrub understory may also be quite diverse, including Huckleberry Oak (Q. -
Chamaecyparis Lawsoniana: a Review of Literature
International Journal of Medical and Health Research International Journal of Medical and Health Research ISSN: 2454-9142 Received: 02-09-2018; Accepted: 04-10-2018 www.medicalsciencejournal.com Volume 4; Issue 11; November 2018; Page No. 11-13 Chamaecyparis lawsoniana: A review of literature Bhasker Sharma Department of Homoeopathy, Sharma Homoeopathy Chikitsalya and Research Center, Itwa Bazar, Siddharthnagar, Utter Pradesh, India Abstract The aerial part of Chamaecyparis lawsoniana is often employed in traditional medicine. The drug is mentioned in the homoeopathic literature and used clinically for severe pain in stomach, keloid, tumors, lipoma of thigh and warts. The present article shows the history and usage of Chamaecyparis lawsoniana in bacterial and viral infection. Keywords: Chamaecyparis lawsoniana, homoeopathic, viral Introduction it. The root rot spread from an unknown source into Chamaecyparis lawsoniana (Murr.) Parl. of the family ornamental plantings outside the native range, from there Cupressaceae, is a large tree 43–55 m in height. The plant is throughout the northern part of the commercial range, and known by the name Port‑ Orford‑ Cedar or Lawson’s cypress. now has reached all but the more remote areas of the range of Its distribution is restricted to the coastal forests of the cedar. There is no known genetic resistance or established Southwestern Oregon and Northern California in the USA. In chemical control. The root rot moves in water via aquatic India, it is grown in gardens of the hills of West Bengal and spores; as spores in mud transported by people, machinery, or Nilgiris of India [1]. animals; or by growing through root grafts between adjacent The aerial part of Chamaecyparis lawsoniana is often trees. -
The Late Cretaceous-Early Tertiary Polar Forests of Northwest Ellesmere Island, Nunavut, Canada: Palaeobotany, Palaeoecology and Palaeoclimatology
THE LATE CRETACEOUS-EARLY TERTIARY POLAR FORESTS OF NORTHWEST ELLESMERE ISLAND, NUNAVUT, CANADA: PALAEOBOTANY, PALAEOECOLOGY AND PALAEOCLIMATOLOGY Adam Zoltan Csank Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science, Honours Department of Earth Sciences Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia Apri12002 Dalhousie University Department of Earth Sciences HJiiicl'\. :--;o'"a Scoria (cJncJda BJH 315 t9021 494-1358 f..l,X t902• 494-6889 DATE Arr=i I, /5 :zoo~ AUTHOR ' TITLE fh~ Late C"etac.eoui ~Ia.,. Fo~"*etff 6F No~thw~ft flf~>tJfP.~ IsJqa" Nvrza,v-vt; Cin.ada : PaJ.ze;g_J~~y, FJJ.uoec.,ltJgy ad Pd!a~ol../l tr it"'09 r Degree Convocatior: Year aoo3 Permission is herewith granted :o Dalhousie Uni•Jersity to circulate and to have copied for non-commercial pu=?oses, at i:s discretion, the above title upon the request of individuals or i~stitutions. THE AUT~OR RESERVES OTHER PtBL!CATION RIGHTS, AND NEITHER THE THESIS NOR EX!E..~SIVE EXTRACTS FROM IT MAY SE PR!.nED OR OTHER'.JISE REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE AUTHOR'S ~~ITT~~ P~~ISSION. THE AUTHOR ATTESTS THAT P~~ISSION HAS BEE..~ OBTAINED FOR THE USE OF AL~ COPYRIGHTED ~!ERIAL APPEARING I~ THIS THESIS (OTHER THAN BRIEF EXCERPTS REQUIRING ONLY PROPER ACl<NOtJLEDGE.'iE..'IT IN SCHOLl.RLY w~ITING) AND THAT ALL SUCH USE IS CLEARLY AClQWtJLEOGED. Abstract During the Mesozoic to Early Cenozoic greenhouse climate phase forests grew well within the polar circle. These unique polar forest ecosystems flourished in a warm, high-latitude environment where trees were subjected to months of unbroken winter darkness followed by continuous daylight in the summer and elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide levels (c. -
Cupressaceae – Cypress Family
CUPRESSACEAE – CYPRESS FAMILY Plant: shrubs and small to large trees, with resin Stem: woody Root: Leaves: evergreen (some deciduous); opposite or whorled, small, crowded and often overlapping and scale-like or sometimes awl- or needle-like Flowers: imperfect (monoecious or dioecious); no true flowers; male cones small and herbaceous, spore-forming; female cones woody (berry-like in junipers), scales opposite or in 3’s, without bracts Fruit: no true fruits; berry-like or drupe-like; 1-2 seeds at cone-scale, often with 2 wings Other: sometimes included with Pinaceae; locally mostly ‘cedars’; Division Coniferophyta (Conifers), Gymnosperm Group Genera: 30+ genera; locally Chamaecyparis, Juniperus (juniper), Thuja (arbor vitae), Taxodium (cypress) WARNING – family descriptions are only a layman’s guide and should not be used as definitive Flower Morphology in the Cupressaceae (Cypress Family) Examples of some common genera Common Juniper Juniperus communis L. var. depressa Pursh Bald Cypress Taxodium distichum (L.) L.C. Rich. Arbor Vitae [Northern White Cedar] Eastern Red Cedar [Juniper] Thuja occidentalis L. Juniperus virginiana L. var. virginiana CUPRESSACEAE – CYPRESS FAMILY Ashe's Juniper; Juniperus ashei J. Buchholz Common Juniper; Juniperus communis L. var. depressa Pursh Utah Juniper; Juniperus osteosperma (Torr.) Little Eastern Red Cedar [Juniper]; Juniperus virginiana L. var. virginiana Bald Cypress; Taxodium distichum (L.) L.C. Rich. Arbor Vitae [Northern White Cedar]; Thuja occidentalis L. Ashe's Juniper USDA Juniperus ashei J. Buchholz Cupressaceae (Cypress Family) Ashe Juniper Natural Area, Stone County, Missouri Notes: shrub to small tree; leaves evergreen, scale- like in 2-4 ranks, somewhat ovate with acute tip, no glands but resinous, margin with minute teeth; bark gray-brown-reddish, shreds easily, white blotches ring trunk and branches; fruit globular, fleshy and hard, blue, glaucous; dolostone bluffs and glades [V Max Brown, 2010] Common Juniper USDA Juniperus communis L. -
Emergent Crowns and Light-Use Complementarity Lead to Global Maximum Biomass and Leaf Area in Sequoia Sempervirens Forests ⇑ Robert Van Pelt A,B, , Stephen C
Forest Ecology and Management 375 (2016) 279–308 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Forest Ecology and Management journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/foreco Emergent crowns and light-use complementarity lead to global maximum biomass and leaf area in Sequoia sempervirens forests ⇑ Robert Van Pelt a,b, , Stephen C. Sillett a,b, William A. Kruse c, James A. Freund b, Russell D. Kramer b a Department of Forestry and Wildland Resources, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA 95521, USA b School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, College of the Environment, University of Washington, Box 352100, Seattle, WA 98195, USA c Kruse Imaging, 3230 Ross Rd., Palo Alto, CA 94303, USA article info abstract Article history: Forests >80 m tall have the highest biomass, and individual trees in these forests are Earth’s largest with Received 23 January 2016 deep crowns emerging above neighboring vegetation, but it is unclear to what degree these maxima Received in revised form 9 May 2016 depend on the emergent trees themselves or a broader-scale forest structure. Here we advance the Accepted 13 May 2016 concept of emergent facilitation, whereby emergent trees benefit co-occurring species. Trees reorganize foliage within crowns to optimize available light and, if long-lived, can reiterate after crown damage to become emergent. The height, depth, and spacing of emergent trees in turn allows for abundant light Keywords: to pass through the canopy, leading to light-use complementarity as well as elevated biomass, leaf area, Sequoia sempervirens and species diversity of the forest as a whole. We chose Sequoia sempervirens to develop this concept and Old growth Forest structure installed eleven 1-ha plots in old-growth forests spanning nearly six degrees of latitude in California.