Environmental Impact Assessments
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Shale Gas in the UK
Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Shale Gas in the UK A thesis submitted to The University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Science and Engineering 2017 Jasmin Cooper School of Chemical Engineering and Analytical Science Table of Contents List of Tables 7 List of Figures 9 Abbreviations 10 Abstract 12 Declaration 13 Copyright Statement 13 Acknowledgements 14 Chapter 1: Introduction 15 1. Background 15 1.1. Shale gas and how it is extracted 15 1.2. Conventional gas and shale gas 19 1.3. Energy mix in the UK 22 1.4. UK shale gas 24 2. Aims and objectives 25 3. Thesis structure 26 4. Methodology 27 4.1. Goal and scope definition 27 4.2. Identification of sustainability issues and definition of indicators 29 4.3. Identification of electricity generation options 30 4.4. Definition of scenarios 31 4.5. Life cycle sustainability assessment 31 4.5.1. Environmental sustainability assessment 31 4.5.2. Economic sustainability assessment 33 4.5.3. Social sustainability assessment 34 4.5.4. Multi-criteria decision analysis 36 4.5.5. Data quality assessment 36 4.6. Conclusions and recommendations 37 References 39 Chapter 2: Shale gas: A review of the economic, environmental and social 48 sustainability Abstract 49 1. Introduction 50 2. Economic aspects 54 2.1. The US experience 54 2.1.1. Direct impacts 54 2.1.2. Indirect impacts 57 2.2. Other regions 58 3. Environmental aspects 61 3.1. Air emissions and impacts 61 3.1.1. GHG and climate change 61 3.1.2. -
Leicester's Green Infrastructure Strategy
LEICESTER GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE STRATEGY 2015-2025 EVIDENCE BASE, ACTIONS AND OPPORTUNITIES 1 | P a g e FOREWORD This framework sets out the strategic vision for our green sites in Leicester and the ways in which they can be created, managed and maintained to provide maximum benefits to the people who live, work or visit Leicester. The actions are supported by an evidence base of data and information which recognise and prioritise key areas where resources can be focussed to develop high quality green infrastructure (GI) into our new and existing communities. By placing the framework within the planning system it is possible to provide the key tools needed to secure these areas and design them to provide multi- functional green space. Improvements to established green space and creating new sites to surround built development will provide an accessible and natural green network. These areas will be capable of supporting a range of functions which include landscaping/public amenity, recreation, flood control, safer access routes, cooler areas to combat predicted climate change and places for wildlife. These functions give rise to a range of environmental and quality of life benefits which include providing attractive and distinctive places to live, work and play; improving public health, facilitating access and encouraging sustainable transport as well as offering an environment to support wildlife. Placing a monetary value on these benefits is difficult, but many have potential to deliver significant economic value by increasing the attractiveness of a neighbourhood for businesses and employers, encouraging tourism and associated revenue, reducing health care costs and maintenance or clean-up costs from flooding. -
Leicester and Leicestershire Strategic Growth Plan (Final Report)
Leicester and Leicestershire Strategic Growth Plan (Final Report) Sustainability Appraisal Report September, 2018 REVISION SCHEDULE Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 1 September Interim SA Report for Leicester and Ian McCluskey Ian McCluskey Alan Houghton 2017 Leicestershire Strategic Planning Group Principal Sustainability Principal Sustainability Regional Director (Alternatives assessment findings) Consultant Consultant Matthew Stopforth Planning Consultant 2 January, Draft SA Report Ian McCluskey Mark Fessey Alan Houghton 2018 Principal Sustainability Principal Consultant Regional Director Consultant 3 February 2nd, Final SA Report Ian McCluskey Mark Fessey Alan Houghton 2018 Principal Sustainability Principal Consultant Regional Director Consultant 4 September Updated SA Report for Strategic Planning Ian McCluskey Ian McCluskey Frank Hayes 12th Group review Principal Sustainability Principal Sustainability Associate Director 2018 Consultant Consultant 5 September Final SA Report Ian McCluskey Ian McCluskey Frank Hayes 26th Principal Sustainability Principal Sustainability Associate Director Consultant Consultant Table of contents 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Scoping .............................................................................................................................................. 8 3 Description of the options ............................................................................................................... -
A46 Corridor Study – Stage One Enhanced Strategic Case November 2018 Strictly Embargoed Until 0001 7Th November 2018
Strictly Embargoed until 0001 7th November 2018 Strictly Embargoed until 0001 7th November 2018 A46 Corridor Study – Stage One Enhanced Strategic Case November 2018 Strictly Embargoed until 0001 7th November 2018 Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 2 2. The case for investment in the A46 Corridor .................................................................................... 8 3. Priority sections for investment ...................................................................................................... 22 4. Recommendations for next steps .................................................................................................... 29 Appendix A: Stakeholders Appendix B: Wider Economic Benefits Calculation Appendix C: Prelimary Environmental Risk Assessment (PERA) 1 Strictly Embargoed until 0001 7th November 2018 1. Introduction 1.1 Background The A46 corridor runs for 250 kilometres between the South West of England and Humberside, through the Midlands. The corridor comprises the M69 and short sections of the M1 and A45. At either end, the corridor divides into a number of corridors, notably the A15 and A1173 in the north, and the A44 and A435 in the south (the A46 begins again in Cheltenham and continues via Stroud to Bath). The majority of the A46 corridor is within the area of interest for this study, as shown in Figure 1-1. The A46 corridor performs many functions: a bypass to the major settlements along its length (such as Coventry, Leicester, Newark and Lincoln); a connection between radial road corridors (such as the M1 and A1); and providing access to the Port of Bristol, the Humber Ports, and South Wales. The road’s form is as varied as its function: from single carriageway ‘A’ road with local accesses to three-lane dual carriageways and motorways. As a consequence of the design of the roads in the corridor and the widely-varying demand for its use, the performance of the corridor also varies considerably. -
Leicester and Leicestershire Strategic Growth Plan (Final Report)
Leicester and Leicestershire Strategic Growth Plan (Final Report) Sustainability Appraisal Report September, 2018 REVISION SCHEDULE Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 1 September Interim SA Report for Leicester and Ian McCluskey Ian McCluskey Alan Houghton 2017 Leicestershire Strategic Planning Group Principal Sustainability Principal Sustainability Regional Director (Alternatives assessment findings) Consultant Consultant Matthew Stopforth Planning Consultant 2 January, Draft SA Report Ian McCluskey Mark Fessey Alan Houghton 2018 Principal Sustainability Principal Consultant Regional Director Consultant 3 February 2nd, Final SA Report Ian McCluskey Mark Fessey Alan Houghton 2018 Principal Sustainability Principal Consultant Regional Director Consultant 4 September Updated SA Report for Strategic Planning Ian McCluskey Ian McCluskey Frank Hayes 12th Group review Principal Sustainability Principal Sustainability Associate Director 2018 Consultant Consultant 5 September Final SA Report Ian McCluskey Ian McCluskey Frank Hayes 26th Principal Sustainability Principal Sustainability Associate Director Consultant Consultant Table of contents 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Scoping .............................................................................................................................................. 8 3 Description of the options ............................................................................................................... -
Biodiversity in Leicester SPG (October 2003)
Biodiversity in Leicester Supplementary Planning Guidance Adopted 13th October 2003 Biodiversity in Leicester Supplementary Planning Guidance CONTENTS chapter page Executive Summary 3 1. Introduction 5 The purpose and structure of the Supplementary Planning Guidance What is biodiversity and why should we conserve it? Leicester's role in biodiversity conservation The biodiversity network and strategic wildlife corridors Planning for biodiversity 2 Nature conservation sites 9 Nature conservation site designation Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs) Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINCs) Local Nature Reserves (LNRs) Biodiversity Enhancement Sites (BESs) 3 Species 13 Protected species Table 1 : Protected species recorded from Leicester Species listed in the local Biodiversity Action Plan and the local Red Data Books The need for protection through the planning system Timing of surveys 4 Habitats 19 Hedgerows Mature Trees Standing dead-wood habitats Species-rich grassland Floodplain wetlands and other wetland habitats Woodlands and spinneys 5 Enhancement of the biodiversity network through 23 planning conditions and agreements Enhancement of biodiversity network Avoiding and minimising damage 1 Compensation Habitat 'translocation' Site groups for enhancement, mitigation or compensation Table 2: Groups of sites in the biodiversity network 6 Monitoring and Review 27 7 Consultation 29 References 30 APPENDICES 1 The planning context for biodiversity 31 Regional Planning Guidance policies Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland -
Blaby Landscape and Settlement Character Assessment
Blaby Landscape and Settlement Character Assessment Final report Prepared by LUC for Blaby District Council January 2020 Project Title: Blaby Landscape and Settlement Character Assessment Client: Blaby District Council Version Date Version Details Prepared by Checked by Approved by 1.0 29/10/2019 Draft report Maria Grant Maria Grant Nick James 1.1 11/12/2019 Draft report Maria Grant Maria Grant Nick James 2.0 07/01/2020 Final report Maria Grant Nick James Nick James Blaby Landscape and Settlement Character Assessment Final report Prepared by LUC for Blaby District Council January 2020 Planning & EIA LUC BRISTOL Offices also in: Land Use Consultants Ltd th Registered in England Design 12 Floor Colston Tower Edinburgh Registered number: 2549296 Landscape Planning Colston Street Bristol Glasgow Registered Office: Landscape Management BS1 4XE Lancaster 43 Chalton Street Ecology T +44 (0)117 929 1997 London London NW1 1JD FS 566056 EMS 566057 LUC uses 100% recycled paper GIS & Visualisation [email protected] Manchester Contents 1 Introduction and background 1 Introduction 1 Background and policy context 1 Landscape baseline 3 2 Methodology 8 Stage 1: Desk study 8 Stage 2: Field verification 17 Stage 3: Reporting 17 3 Landscape Character classification and overall Landscape Sensitivity results 19 Landscape Character Assessment classification for Blaby 19 Overall Landscape Sensitivity Assessment results 22 4 Landscape Character Area profiles 28 5 Settlement Character Area profiles 114 Appendix 1 202 Data and literature list 202 Appendix 2 204 Glossary of terms 204 Appendix 3 207 List of consultees 207 Executive summary Background 1.1 LUC was commissioned by Blaby District Council in July 2019 to produce an up-to-date evidence base for the landscape and settlement character of the district, to support the Blaby Local Plan. -
LESOPS 25 Lott Et Al
2 A Provisional Atlas of the Carabidae of Leicestershire & Rutland Derek Lott, Graham Finch & Gareth Price LESOPS 25 (2011) ISSN 0957 - 1019 A collaborative publication from The Leicestershire & Rutland Environmental Resources Centre and The Leicestershire Entomological Society 3 FOREWORD In the spring of 2009, Derek Lott, Graham Finch & Gareth Price embarked on the production of this atlas. The idea of the atlas was the brainchild of Graham Finch, who had attended a ground beetle training course and became well aware of the need for a VC55 distribution atlas. In July 2009 a very simple first draft was produced. Derek Lott and Graham Finch scrutinized the first draft. A number of important issues needed consideration, such as taxonomic changes, the classification of sites, obtaining accurate grid references and the removal of invalid species records falsely recorded in Leicestershire and Rutland. Derek Lott provided Carabidae context to some sites in the gazetteer as well as providing species context. The production of this atlas was made much easier by the life-long work of Derek Lott, who had already accumulated vast amounts of ground beetle data and local knowledge, without which this atlas would not have been possible. Special thanks go the Carabidae recorders who have sent in records. We have endeavoured to reference and acknowledge the people and sources that have helped in the production of this atlas but often with natural history publications there are too many people to thank over a very long period of time. Our apologies go to the people or sources that have been inadvertently omitted. The gazetteer obtained information from a number of sources, in particular the Flora of Leicestershire (Primavesi & Evans, 1988) and the Flora of Rutland (Messenger, 1971). -
The Parliamentary Constituencies (England) Order 2007
STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2007 No. 1681 REPRESENTATION OF THE PEOPLE, ENGLAND REDISTRIBUTION OF SEATS The Parliamentary Constituencies (England) Order 2007 Made - - - - - 13th June 2007 Coming into force in accordance with article 1(2) £12.00 STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2007 No.1681 REPRESENTATION OF THE PEOPLE, ENGLAND REDISTRIBUTION OF SEATS The Parliamentary Constituencies (England) Order 2007 Made - - - - 13th June 2007 Coming into force in accordance with article 1(2) At the Court at Buckingham Palace, the 13th day of June 2007 Present, The Queen’s Most Excellent Majesty in Council The Boundary Commission for England, in accordance with section 3(1) of the Parliamentary Constituencies Act 1986(a), submitted to the Secretary of State a report dated 31st October 2006 showing the parliamentary constituencies into which they recommend, in accordance with that Act, that England should be divided. A draft of this Order in Council together with a copy of the Boundary Commission’s report was laid before Parliament by the Secretary of State pursuant to section 3(5) of the Parliamentary Constituencies Act 1986, to give effect, without modifications, to the recommendations contained in the report, and each House of Parliament has by resolution approved the draft. Therefore, Her Majesty, is pleased, by and with the advice of Her Privy Council, to make the following Order under section 4 of the Parliamentary Constituencies Act 1986: Citation and commencement 1.—(1) This Order may be cited as the Parliamentary Constituencies (England) Order 2007. (2) This Order shall come into force on the fourteenth day after the day on which it is made. Parliamentary constituencies in England 2.—(1) England shall be divided into the parliamentary constituencies— (a) which are named in column 1 of the Table in the Schedule to this Order; (b) which are designated as being either county constituencies or borough constituencies by inclusion of those words beneath the name in column 1 of the Table in the Schedule; and (a) 1986 c.56. -
English Nature Research Report
r Natural Area: 14. Southern Magnesian Geological Significance: Considerable Limestone (provisional) General geological character: This Natural Area is characterised by the easterly dipping Magnesian Limcstone escarpment ofthe Yorkshire Province. The Permian Magnesian Limestone was deposited on the western edge of the shallow, tropical, Zechstein Sea some 255 million years ago and forms a continuous belt from the south of Shefield to the Durham Coast. Yellow desert sands (reworked by the rising Zechstein Sea) mark the base of the Permian succession. 'Three distinct cycles are recognised within the overlying Magnesian Limestone; thesc cycles consist of interbedded evaporites, mark, siltstones and (dolomitic) limestones and relate to large scale palaeoenvironrnnetal changes often culminating in the evaporation of marine waters in arid climates and the resultant formation of evaporite (salt) deposits. Zechstein-aged sediments in the Southern Magnesian Limestone Natural Area are dominated by the first cycle, characterised by the Cadeby Formation. This is a dolomitised shelf carbonate, similar to modem tropical carbonates such as the Bahamas, and contains a number of fossiliferous patch reefs in the Weatherby Member. Superficial Pleistocene deposits arc not abundanr occurring mainly in isolated patches on high ground. The area was affected by glacial advance on at least twc occasions. An early glaciation (approximately 128,000 years RP) covered the area in ice while during the Devensian (approximately 12,000 years BP) the area was affected by periglacial (tundra-like) erosion. Gorge and cave deposits (eg. at Creswell Crags) contain extensive vertebrate remains, including evidence of humar: occunation. makinr this a kev localitv for intemreting the Pleistocene evolution of the British Isles. -
Scoping Report for Blaby District Local Plan
a Scoping Report for the Blaby District Local Plan Sustainability Appraisal Scoping Report (Post consultation) October 2019 Quality information Prepared by Checked by Approved by Blaby District Council Ian McCluskey Frank Hayes AECOM Principal Consultant Associate Director Larna Smith Graduate Consultant Prepared for: Blaby District Council Prepared by: AECOM Limited 4th Floor Bridgewater House Whitworth Street Manchester M1 6LT UK T: +44 (161) 907 3500 aecom.com © 2019 AECOM Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM. Page | 1 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1 2. Introducing the scope of the SA ...................................................................... 5 3. Population and housing ..................................................................................... 6 4. Health and Wellbeing ...................................................................................... 17 5. Biodiversity and Geodiversity ...................................................................... -
Desford Neighbourhood Plan Strategic Environmental Screening Statement
DESFORD Strategic Environmental Assessment Screening NEIGHBOURHOOD Statement PLAN March 2019 0 Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 2 2. Details of the Neighbourhood Plan ............................................................................................. 4 Title of the plan: ............................................................................................................................... 4 Name of Qualifying Body and Local Planning Authority: ................................................................ 4 Desford Parish Neighbourhood Plan contact point: ....................................................................... 4 Location and spatial extent of the Desford Neighbourhood Plan: ................................................. 4 Timeframe of the Desford Neighbourhood Plan: ............................................................................ 4 Main aims of the Desford Neighbourhood Plan: ............................................................................ 4 Relationship with the Local Plan: .................................................................................................... 5 Will the Desford Parish Neighbourhood Plan propose allocations? And if so, will these be over and above those likely to be included in the Local Plan? .............................................................. 6 What are the key environmental assets (including ‘sensitive areas’)