DOCSLIB.ORG

Election Summary Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Election Summary Report Page: 1 of 7 4/2/2020 4:30:01 PM Election Summary Report Closed Primary IMPERIAL COUNTY March 03, 2020 Summary for: All Contests, All Districts, All Tabulators, All Counting Groups OFFICIAL FINAL REPORT Precincts Reported: 218 of 218 (100.00%) Voters Cast: 23,885 of 77,390 (30.86%) Cards Cast: 23,885 Page: 2 of 7 4/2/2020 4:30:01 PM Presidential Preference - Democratic (Vote for 1) DEM Precincts Reported: 218 of 218 (100.00%) Total Times Cast 13,555 / 37,269 36.37% Candidate Party Total BERNIE SANDERS DEM 5,678 43.39% JOSEPH R. BIDEN DEM 3,795 29.00% MICHAEL R. BLOOMBERG DEM 1,537 11.75% ELIZABETH WARREN DEM 706 5.40% PETE BUTTIGIEG DEM 343 2.62% JULIÁN CASTRO DEM 244 1.86% TOM STEYER DEM 177 1.35% AMY KLOBUCHAR DEM 109 0.83% ANDREW YANG DEM 86 0.66% ROQUE "ROCKY" DE LA DEM 78 0.60% FUENTE III JOHN K. DELANEY DEM 65 0.50% CORY BOOKER DEM 56 0.43% TULSI GABBARD DEM 56 0.43% MICHAEL BENNET DEM 54 0.41% MARIANNE WILLIAMSON DEM 24 0.18% JOE SESTAK DEM 23 0.18% MICHAEL A. ELLINGER DEM 18 0.14% MARK STEWART DEM 15 0.11% GREENSTEIN MOSIE BOYD DEM 11 0.08% DEVAL PATRICK DEM 10 0.08% Total Votes 13,085 Total NAKIA L. ANTHONY WRITE-IN 0 0.00% DAPHNE DENISE BRADFORD WRITE-IN 0 0.00% WILLIE FELIX CARTER WRITE-IN 0 0.00% MICHAEL DENAME WRITE-IN 0 0.00% JEFFREY H. DROBMAN WRITE-IN 0 0.00% ROBERT JORDAN WRITE-IN 0 0.00% HEATHER MARIE STAGG WRITE-IN 0 0.00% Page: 3 of 7 4/2/2020 4:30:01 PM Presidential Preference - Republican (Vote for 1) REP Precincts Reported: 218 of 218 (100.00%) Total Times Cast 6,680 / 14,635 45.64% Candidate Party Total DONALD J. TRUMP REP 5,876 92.58% JOE WALSH REP 146 2.30% ROQUE "ROCKY" DE LA REP 127 2.00% FUENTE BILL WELD REP 89 1.40% ROBERT ARDINI REP 63 0.99% MATTHEW JOHN MATERN REP 23 0.36% ZOLTAN G. ISTVAN REP 23 0.36% Total Votes 6,347 Total DENIS C.GRASSKA WRITE-IN 0 0.00% ROBERT LEE MANNING JR. WRITE-IN 0 0.00% Presidential Preference - American Independent (Vote for 1) AI Precincts Reported: 218 of 218 (100.00%) Total Times Cast 449 / 1,943 23.11% Candidate Party Total ROQUE "ROCKY" DE LA AI 69 41.82% FUENTE DON BLANKENSHIP AI 32 19.39% PHIL COLLINS AI 31 18.79% J.R. MYERS AI 18 10.91% CHARLES KRAUT AI 15 9.09% Total Votes 165 Presidential Preference - Green (Vote for 1) GRN Precincts Reported: 218 of 218 (100.00%) Total Times Cast 32 / 216 14.81% Candidate Party Total HOWIE HAWKINS GRN 8 50.00% DARIO HUNTER GRN 4 25.00% DAVID ROLDE GRN 3 18.75% SEDINAM MOYOWASIFZA- GRN 1 6.25% CURRY DENNIS LAMBERT GRN 0 0.00% Total Votes 16 Total KENT MESPLAY WRITE-IN 0 0.00% Page: 4 of 7 4/2/2020 4:30:01 PM Presidential Preference - Libertarian (Vote for 1) LIB Precincts Reported: 218 of 218 (100.00%) Total Times Cast 110 / 477 23.06% Candidate Party Total KIM RUFF LIB 11 18.33% JACOB HORNBERGER LIB 9 15.00% KEN ARMSTRONG LIB 8 13.33% ADAM KOKESH LIB 7 11.67% SOURAYA FAAS LIB 6 10.00% SAM ROBB LIB 5 8.33% JO JORGENSEN LIB 5 8.33% MAX ABRAMSON LIB 3 5.00% VERMIN SUPREME LIB 3 5.00% ERIK CHASE GERHARDT LIB 2 3.33% KEENAN WALLACE DUNHAM LIB 1 1.67% STEVEN A RICHEY LIB 0 0.00% DAN BEHRMAN LIB 0 0.00% Total Votes 60 Total NICHOLAS D'ARTAGNAN WRITE-IN 0 0.00% DUMAS GEBY EVA ESPINOSA WRITE-IN 0 0.00% JAMES ORLANDO OGLE WRITE-IN 0 0.00% Presidential Preference - Peace and Freedom (Vote for 1) PF Precincts Reported: 218 of 218 (100.00%) Total Times Cast 50 / 540 9.26% Candidate Party Total GLORIA LA RIVA PF 24 72.73% HOWIE HAWKINS PF 9 27.27% Total Votes 33 Congress 51st (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 218 of 218 (100.00%) Total Times Cast 23,885 / 77,390 30.86% Candidate Party Total JUAN C. VARGAS DEM 15,133 65.04% JUAN M HIDALGO, JR REP 8,136 34.96% Total Votes 23,269 Page: 5 of 7 4/2/2020 4:30:01 PM State Assembly District 56 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 218 of 218 (100.00%) Total Times Cast 23,885 / 77,390 30.86% Candidate Party Total EDUARDO GARCIA DEM 14,905 64.17% AMERICA FIGUEROA REP 8,321 35.83% Total Votes 23,226 Supervisor 2nd District (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 39 of 39 (100.00%) Total Times Cast 5,622 / 16,125 34.87% Candidate Party Total LUIS A. PLANCARTE 2,926 55.37% CLAUDIA M. CAMARENA 2,358 44.63% Total Votes 5,284 Supervisor 3rd District (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 40 of 40 (100.00%) Total Times Cast 5,263 / 16,677 31.56% Candidate Party Total MICHAEL W. KELLEY 4,306 100.00% Total Votes 4,306 Supervisor 4th District (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 51 of 51 (100.00%) Total Times Cast 4,597 / 12,842 35.80% Candidate Party Total RYAN E. KELLEY 3,813 100.00% Total Votes 3,813 Page: 6 of 7 4/2/2020 4:30:01 PM Imperial Irrigation Director Division 2 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 46 of 46 (100.00%) Total Times Cast 5,271 / 15,464 34.09% Candidate Party Total JB HAMBY 2,149 41.89% RYAN D. CHILDERS 1,355 26.41% BRUCE KUHN 1,312 25.58% DILDA DENNIS MCFADDEN 314 6.12% Total Votes 5,130 Imperial Irrigation Director Division 4 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 27 of 27 (100.00%) Total Times Cast 4,093 / 16,862 24.27% Candidate Party Total ERIC ORTEGA 1,841 46.47% JAVIER GONZALEZ 1,138 28.72% JOONG KIM 983 24.81% Total Votes 3,962 Proposition 13 (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 218 of 218 (100.00%) Total Times Cast 23,885 / 77,390 30.86% Candidate Party Total NO 11,647 50.31% YES 11,503 49.69% Total Votes 23,150 Measure G (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 4 of 4 (100.00%) Total Times Cast 609 / 1,721 35.39% Candidate Party Total NO 331 56.10% YES 259 43.90% Total Votes 590 Page: 7 of 7 4/2/2020 4:30:01 PM Measure P (Vote for 1) Precincts Reported: 29 of 29 (100.00%) Total Times Cast 3,455 / 9,961 34.69% Candidate Party Total NO 1,775 52.59% YES 1,600 47.41% Total Votes 3,375.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2020 Primary Election Results
    Official Election Results Primary Election - May 12, 2020 Thomas County, Nebraska Description District# Name Party Total Thomas Thomas Nonpartisan/Partisan Description District# Name Party Early Voting Early Voting Thomas Precinct Thomas By Request Total Early Voting Thomas Republican Ticket President Donald J. Trump Republican 262 Early Voting 221 Thomas 41 N/A President Bill Weld Republican 5 Early Voting 4 Thomas 1 N/A US Senator Ben Sasse Republican 141 Early Voting 124 Thomas 14 3 3 0 US Senator Matt Innis Republican 132 Early Voting 100 Thomas 28 4 4 0 President Tulsi Gabbard Democratic 0 Early Voting Thomas 0 Congress, District 3 Larry Lee Scott Bolinger Republican 10 Early Voting 8 Thomas 1 1 1 0 Congress, District 3 Adrian Smith Republican 219 Early Voting 186 Thomas 29 4 4 0 Congress, District 3 William Elfgren Republican 13 Early Voting 13 Thomas 0 0 0 0 Congress, District 3 Justin Moran Republican 11 Early Voting 5 Thomas 6 0 0 0 Congress, District 3 Arron Kowalski Republican 7 Early Voting 4 Thomas 1 2 2 0 0 Democratic Ticket President Joe Biden Democratic 24 Early Voting 21 Thomas 2 1 1 0 President Tulsi Gabbard Democratic 0 Early Voting 0 Thomas 0 0 0 0 President Bernie Sanders Democratic 3 Early Voting 0 Thomas 2 1 1 0 President Elizabeth Warren Democratic 0 Early Voting 0 Thomas 0 0 0 0 0 US Senator Dennis Frank Maček Democratic 2 Early Voting 1 Thomas 1 0 0 0 US Senator Chris Janicek Democratic 7 Early Voting 6 Thomas 0 1 1 0 US Senator Larry Marvin Democratic 5 Early Voting 5 Thomas 0 0 0 0 US Senator Angie Philips Democratic 5 Early Voting 2 Thomas 2 1 1 0 US Senator Alisha Shelton Democratic 3 Early Voting 2 Thomas 1 0 0 0 US Senator Daniel M.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 112 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 112 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION SENATE—Wednesday, December 7, 2011 The Senate met at 11:30 a.m. and was appoint the Honorable KIRSTEN E. GILLI- day and the hundreds of thousands called to order by the Honorable BRAND, a Senator from the State of New more who made the ultimate sacrifice KIRSTEN E. GILLIBRAND, a Senator from York, to perform the duties of the Chair. during World War II. These service- the State of New York. DANIEL K. INOUYE, members are heroes. They set a fine ex- President pro tempore. ample for the men and women who pro- PRAYER Mrs. GILLIBRAND thereupon as- tect our freedoms today, and none of us sumed the chair as Acting President The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- will ever forget their courage. pro tempore. fered the following prayer: Let us pray. f f O mighty God, our hope for years to RECOGNITION OF THE MAJORITY PAYROLL TAX CUT come, thank You for giving us this day LEADER to use for Your glory. From the morn- Mr. REID. Madam President, the Re- ing Sun until the going down of the The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- publicans like to claim they are the same, Your blessings provide us with pore. The majority leader is recog- party of the tax cuts, but as Democrats confidence that our future is brighter nized. propose more tax relief—we propose it than our past. f every day for working families—Repub- Today, as we remember Pearl Harbor licans every day are showing their true SCHEDULE and a day of infamy, we praise You for colors.
    [Show full text]
  • FCS Confronts Bullying Students Push Politics
    friends’ central school FOCUS Volume XXXVII, Issue IV 1101 City Avenue Wynnewood Pennsylvania 19096 January/February 2012 FCS Confronts Bullying By OLIVER GOODMAN ‘13 In This and STEFAN SULTAN ‘15 Issue: rom the graph to the right it is reassuring to know that Fof the 332 (85% of the Upper School) of Friends’ Central How much of a problem is bullying in our Upper School? students who took the bullying survey last April, only 7% of them thought bullying to be a major problem in our commu- 7% Student Jobs nity. In comparison a national bullying survey found that 68% pg 3 of students saw bullying as a major problem in their schools. 18% Additionally, 53% of students at FC reported bullying to be a A big problem small problem. But what exactly counts as bullying? I'm not sure Alumni Dr. Sternberg, the school psychologist, defines bully- 53% Not a problem ing as “behavior that is intended to harm or hurt others. It is A small problem Athletes when one individual or a group of individuals purposely mis- 22% pg 4 treats another. It can be done directly (to a person), or indi- rectly (about a person).” Shockingly enough, many people who took the survey Fashion reported that the majority of the bullying they had encoun- pg 2 tered was happening in the classroom. To see what teach- At Friends’ Central we are lucky to be well ahead of ers thought of this, the perspective of grade dean Mr. Buck, the national average in students who say bullying is not a big as he explained it, is, “I see very little [bullying].
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Letters List 2017-2019
    R Sen. Maria Cantwell Office Depot Sales of Possibly Unnecessary 11/17/16 1/30/ 17 Computer Repair Products T Sen. Bill Nelson SES Bonuses 11/17/16 1/24/17 V Sen. Bill Nelson Out of Network Hospital Costs 12/1/16 1/31/17 X Sens. Mike Lee, Amy Seed Mergers 12/14/16 1/30/ 17 Klobuchar y Rep. Peter Welch Visa / EMV 12/14/16 1/31/17 z Sens. Cory Booker, Robert FieldTurf 12/16/16 1/24/17 Menendez vu Sens. Mike Lee, Ron Johnson FTC Actions 12/21/16 1/23/17 CONGRESSIONAL LETTERS 2017: VOLUME 1 l(b)( ?)(A) I Member: Subject ~sponded 1 Sen. Mike Lee Non Public Briefing onl 7 1/4/2017 1/5/17 Qualcomm, & Questcor 2 Reps. Eliot Engel, Tony Fur Labeling 1/9/2017 2/16/17 Cardenas, Paul Tonka, Earl Blumenauer, Steve Cohen, Donald Beyer Jr., Mike Quigley, Leonard Lance, Nita Lowey, Anna Eshoo, & Jerry McNerney 3 Sen. Ted Cruz Seed Mergers 1/11/17 1/31/17 4 Sen. Mike Lee Non Public Briefing on Quincy 1/17/17 1/25/17 Biosciences 5 Sens. Susan Collins and Robert Invitation to testify re Senior Scams 1/23/17 Casey Jr. (Senate Aging Committee) 6 Sen. Cory Booker Walgreens / RiteAid Merger 2/2/17 2/21 /17 7 Sen. Bill Nelson Fiat Chrysler 1/31/17 3/15/17 8 Rep. Steve Chabot Invitation to testify re Small Business 2/16/17 Cybersecurity (House Small Business Committee) 9 Sen. Jon Tester Vizio 3/3/17 3/21/17 10 Sen.
    [Show full text]
  • Primary Care: Estimating Leading Democratic Candidates' Health Plans
    CHAIRMEN Primary Care: MITCH DANIELS Estimating Leading Democratic Candidates’ Health Plans LEON PANETTA US Budget Watch 2020 TIM PENNY January 24, 2020 PRESIDENT Health care is the single largest part of the federal budget and a key driver of our MAYA MACGUINEAS unsustainably rising national debt.1 Rising health care costs also place growing burdens on households and businesses and – along with a significant uninsured rate DIRECTORS BARRY ANDERSON – have prompted those seeking higher office to propose bold solutions with ERSKINE BOWLES significant fiscal implications. CHARLES BOWSHER KENT CONRAD As part of our US Budget Watch 2020 project, the Committee for a Responsible Federal DAN CRIPPEN Budget has analyzed the plans of the four candidates polling the highest in the VIC FAZIO WILLIS GRADISON majority of national polls and polls in the first four primary states: Vice President Joe JANE HARMAN Biden, Mayor Pete Buttigieg, Senator Bernie Sanders, and Senator Elizabeth Warren. WILLIAM HOAGLAND JIM JONES For each plan, we score the fiscal impact of coverage and other spending provisions, LOU KERR JIM KOLBE reductions in current and proposed health care costs, direct offsets proposed as part MARJORIE MARGOLIES of their plans to expand coverage, and further offsets meant to finance remaining DAVE MCCURDY costs. We focus on federal fiscal impact rather than the effect on total national health JAMES MCINTYRE, JR. expenditures. DAVID MINGE MARNE OBERNAUER, JR. JUNE O’NEILL Our estimates are rough and rounded, based on our best understanding of how PAUL O’NEILL campaign-level detail translates into specific policies, and subject to change as more RUDOLPH PENNER details are made available.2 This report is for educational purposes and does not ROBERT REISCHAUER represent an endorsement of any candidate or any policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrate and Reactivate the 1968 Fair Housing Mandate Courtney L
    Georgia State University College of Law Reading Room Faculty Publications By Year Faculty Publications 1-1-2016 Integrate and Reactivate the 1968 Fair Housing Mandate Courtney L. Anderson Georgia State University College of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/faculty_pub Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, and the Housing Law Commons Recommended Citation Courtney L. Anderson, Integrate and Reactivate the 1968 Fair Housing Mandate, 13 Hastings Race & Poverty L.J. 1 (2016) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Publications at Reading Room. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications By Year by an authorized administrator of Reading Room. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HASTINGS RACE AND POVERTY LAW JOURNAL VOLUME XIII NO. 1 WINTER 2016 ARTICLES INTEGRATE AND REACTIVATE THE 1968 FAIR HOUSING MANDATE Courtney L. Anderson LA GRAN LUCHA: LATINA AND LATINO LAWYERS, BREAKING THE LAW ON PRINCIPLE, AND CONFRONTING THE RISKS OF REPRESENTATION Marc‐Tizoc González THE OBERGEFELL MARRIAGE EQUALITY DECISION, WITH ITS EMPHASIS ON HUMAN DIGNITY, AND A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO FOOD SECURITY Maxine D. Goodman NOTE POLICE TERROR AND OFFICER INDEMNIFICATION Allyssa Villanueva University of California Hastings College of the Law 200 McAllister Street, San Francisco, CA 94102 HASTINGS RACE AND POVERTY LAW JOURNAL Winter 2016 Volume 13, Issue 1 Mission Statement The Hastings Race and Poverty Law Journal is committed to promoting and inspiring discourse in the legal community regarding issues of race, poverty, social justice, and the law. This Journal is committed to addressing disparities in the legal system.
    [Show full text]
  • Giving Adequate Attention to Failings of Judicial Impartiality
    Impeach Brent Benjamin Now!? Giving Adequate Attention to Failings of Judicial Impartiality JEFFREY W. STEMPEL* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION:M EN WITH NO REGRETS AND INADEQUATE CONCERN................... 2 II. CAPERTON V. MASSEY: JUDICIAL ERROR; WASTED RESOURCES; NEW CONSTITUTIONAL LAW—AND LIGHT TREATMENT OF THE PERPETRATOR ............................................................................................... 10 A. The Underlying Action............................................................................... 10 B. The 2004 West Virginia Supreme Court Elections..................................... 12 C. Review and Recusal ................................................................................... 13 D. The Supreme Court Intervenes .................................................................. 16 E. Caperton’s Test for Determining When Recusal Is Required by the Due Process Clause ........................................................................ 17 F. Comparing the “Reasonable Question as to Impartiality” Standard for Nonconstitutional Recusal Under Federal and State Law to the “Serious Risk of Bias” Standard for Constitutional Due Process Under Caperton....................................... 19 G. The Dissenters’ Defense of Justice Benjamin—And Defective Judging ...................................................................................... 25 H. Enablers: Reluctance To Criticize Justice Benjamin................................. 28 * © 2010 Jeffrey W. Stempel. Doris S. & Theodore B. Lee Professor
    [Show full text]
  • Monmouth University Poll NORTH CAROLINA: COOPER LEADS for GUV, TIGHT SENATE RACE, PREZ in PLAY
    Please attribute this information to: Monmouth University Poll West Long Branch, NJ 07764 www.monmouth.edu/polling Follow on Twitter: @MonmouthPoll _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Released: Contact: Thursday, September 3, 2020 PATRICK MURRAY 732-979-6769 (cell); 732-263-5858 (office) [email protected] Follow on Twitter: @PollsterPatrick NORTH CAROLINA: COOPER LEADS FOR GUV, TIGHT SENATE RACE, PREZ IN PLAY West Long Branch, NJ – Joe Biden and Donald Trump are separated by a negligible 2-point margin among all registered voters in North Carolina according to the Monmouth (“Mon-muth”) University Poll, while the U.S. Senate race is even tighter. Gov. Roy Cooper, on the other hand, currently enjoys a large lead in his reelection bid on the back of strong voter approval of his handling of the Covid- 19 crisis. Among all registered voters in North Carolina, the race for president stands at 47% for Biden and 45% for Trump. Another 3% support Jo Jorgensen (Libertarian), less than 1% back either Howie Hawkins (Green) or Don Blankenship (Constitution), and 3% are undecided. Voter intent includes 41% who say they are certain to vote for Biden (versus 44% who say they are not at all likely to support the Democrat) and 40% who are certain to support Trump (versus 47% who are not at all likely). Under a likely voter scenario with a somewhat higher level of turnout than 2016, Biden stands at 48% support and Trump is at 46%. The results are an identical 48% to 46% when using a likely voter model with lower turnout. Each of the last three presidential elections were decided by fewer than four percentage points in North Carolina.
    [Show full text]
  • Amy Coney Barrett
    Post-Hearing Analysis: Amy Coney Barrett Introduction After President Trump nominated Amy Coney Barrett, Alliance for Justice issued our report. Reviewing her record, it was clear that if Barrett is confirmed, the American people will suffer grave harm. Millions will lose their health insurance. The clock will be turned back on critical rights and legal protections. Her record overwhelmingly demonstrates that she would be an extreme member of the Court and would implement the dangerous agenda of President Trump and the Republican Party. This week, Amy Coney Barrett’s testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee only confirmed and reinforced our prior conclusions. When pressed regarding Trump’s litmus tests — and her own record — she was evasive, misleading, and even contemptuous. She was visibly annoyed that senators had the gall to probe her record and views. She chastised senators for asking questions she decided she would not answer. She failed to turn over key documents to the Senate.. She famously held up a blank notepad, proudly displaying she had taken no notes; an apt metaphor for how she went out of her way not to address the very real concerns and fears millions of people have with her nomination. Republican senators spent the hearings trying to downplay the stakes and pretend that they were only interested in judges who will neutrally and without bias apply the law. Ted Cruz once asked a previous Trump nominee — who he later forced to withdraw — what that judge had ever done to advance the conservative cause. Yet, over days of hearing, Republicans tried to pretend they weren’t pushing an agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Omnibus June 2019 Dem Primary
    Democratic Dividing Lines Verified Voter Omnibus Survey N=484 Democrats or Democratic leaners June 22 - June 25, 2019 !X!1 Key Findings • Biden’s lead among 24 announced Democratic candidates has narrowed by 6-points since May to 32% of the Democratic vote. • Biden’s 6-point drop came with a concurrent 6-point gain by Elizabeth Warren to 11% of the Democratic vote, or 4- points behind Bernie Sanders who takes 15% of the Democratic vote. • Biden continues to lead both Sanders and Warren in head to head match-ups, but his lead has narrowed to 30-points from both Sanders and Warren, down from 36-points ahead of Sanders and 47-points ahead of Warren in May. • 73% of Democrats plan to watch the debates, or coverage of the debates. Ahead of the kickoff of tonight’s debates, we tested Democratic concern about two recent pieces of news about Biden — his flip flopping on the Hyde Amendment’s impact on access to abortion, and past associations with segregationists. • We found the Hyde Amendment resonates more strongly with Democratic voters, with 39% of Democrats concerned about Biden’s stance on the Hyde Amendment, and 22% concerned about his associations with segregationists. • Particularly concerned are women, African Americans, younger voters, and more educated voters. !2 Methodology • Using a voter file-matched online panel, we surveyed n=1,006 registered voters across the country from June 22 to June 25, 2019, with a sample of 484 Democrats or Democratic-leaning Independents. • With our third monthly tracking survey of 2019, we were able to confirm the voting history of participants and track changes in the attitudes and behaviors of key 2020 voters since our last survey of verified Democratic or Democratic-leaning Independent voters from May 20 to May 21, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Biden Holds Steady, Warren Slips As the Iowa Caucuses Approach
    ABC NEWS/WASHINGTON POST POLL: 2020 Democrats EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE AFTER 12:01 a.m. Sunday, Jan. 26, 2020 Biden Holds Steady, Warren Slips As the Iowa Caucuses Approach Joe Biden’s holding his ground in preference nationally for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination, with Bernie Sanders close by and a drop in support for Elizabeth Warren. Two new arrivals to the leaderboard come next in the latest ABC News/Washington Post poll: Mike Bloomberg and Andrew Yang. With the Feb. 3 Iowa caucuses drawing near, 77 percent of Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents nationally say they’re satisfied with their choice of candidates. Far fewer, 24 percent, are very satisfied, although that’s near the average in ABC/Post polls since 2000. This poll, produced for ABC by Langer Research Associates, finds plenty of room for movement: Just about half of leaned Democrats are very enthusiastic about their choice, and 53 percent say they’d consider supporting a different candidate. Warren, while weaker as a first choice, leads in second-choice preference. Further, while Biden continues to prevail by a wide margin as the candidate with the best chance to defeat Donald Trump in the general election, his score on the measure has slipped slightly, from 45 percent in July to 38 percent now. Eighteen percent pick Sanders as best against Trump; 10 percent, Warren. Biden does best in vote preference among likely voters, defined here as those who say they’re registered and certain to vote in their state’s primary or caucuses. He has 34 percent support in this group, leading Sanders, at 22 percent, and Warren, 14 percent.
    [Show full text]
  • Ipsos Poll Conducted for Thomson Reuters Core Political Data
    Ipsos Poll Conducted for Thomson Reuters Core Political Data AUGUST 7, 2019 © 2019 Ipsos. All rights reserved. Contains Ipsos' Confidential and Proprietary information and may not be disclosed or reproduced without the prior written consent of Ipsos. © 2019 Ipsos 1 IPSOS POLL CONDUCTED FOR REUTERS Core Political Data These are findings from an Ipsos poll conducted for date August 1-5, 2019 For the survey, a sample of including ages 2,129 1,795 807 772 140 Registered Democratic Republican Independent 18+ Americans Voters Registered Registered Registered Voters Voters Voters were interviewed online © 2019 Ipsos 2 IPSOS POLL CONDUCTED FOR REUTERS Core Political Data The precision of the Reuters/Ipsos online polls is measured using a credibility interval. In this case, the poll has a credibility interval of plus or minus the following percentage points 2.4 2.6 3.9 4.0 9.4 All Adults All Registered Democratic Republican Independent Voters Registered Voters Registered Voters Registered Voters For more information about credibility intervals, please see the appendix. © 2019 Ipsos 3 IPSOS POLL CONDUCTED FOR REUTERS Core Political Data • The data were weighted to the U.S. current population data by: – Gender – Age – Education – Ethnicity – Region • Statistical margins of error are not applicable to online polls. • All sample surveys and polls may be subject to other sources of error, including, but not limited to coverage error and measurement error. • Figures marked by an asterisk (*) indicate a percentage value of greater than zero but less than one half of one per cent. • Where figures do not sum to 100, this is due to the effects of rounding.
    [Show full text]