Final Report Normandy and Jersey Lobster

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Final Report Normandy and Jersey Lobster MAC ALISTER ELLIOTTAND PARTNERS LTD FinalReport NormandyandJerseylobster( Homarusgammarus ) fishery 28APRIL 2010 MacAlisterElliottandPartnersLtd 56HighStreet,Lymington HampshireSO419AH UnitedKingdom Tel:015906790 16 Fax:01590671573 E-mail:[email protected] Website: www.macalister-elliott.com Tableofcontents Reportsummary...........................................................................................................1 Résumédurapport.......................................................................................................3 1.Introduction..............................................................................................................5 1.1Generalbackground...........................................................................................5 1.2Client..................................................................................................................5 1.3UnitofCertification...........................................................................................5 1.4Assessmentteamandpeerreviewers.................................................................7 1.5PreviousassessmentsbyMEP...........................................................................8 1.6Reportstructure..................................................................................................9 2.Thefishery..............................................................................................................10 2.1Targetspeciesandpopulation..........................................................................10 2.2Fishingoperations............................................................................................10 2.3Fishingeffort....................................................................................................12 2.3.1Licencedpots.............................................................................................12 2.3.2Othermetricsofeffort...............................................................................13 2.4Landings...........................................................................................................15 2.4.1BasseNormandie.......................................................................................15 2.4.2Jersey.........................................................................................................15 2.4.3Recreationallandings................................................................................16 2.5Retainedspecies,by-catchandprotectedspecies............................................16 2.6Ecosystemcontext............................................................................................18 2.6.1Oceanographiccontext..............................................................................18 2.6.2Benthos......................................................................................................18 2.6.3Protectedanddesignatedareas..................................................................18 2.7Interactionswithotherfisheriesandnon-fisheriesactivities...........................20 3.Stockstatusandassessment...................................................................................21 3.1Fisheries-dependentdataandanalysis.............................................................21 3.2Fisheries-independentdataandanalysis..........................................................22 3.3Sizestructure....................................................................................................23 4.ManagementSystem..............................................................................................25 4.1Organisationsinvolvedinmanagement...........................................................25 4.2Legislativeandadministrativecontext.............................................................26 4.2.1National/regionalframeworks.................................................................26 4.2.2Co-managementframework......................................................................26 2147R02BApril2011 4.3Managementplanandobjectives,rulesandtools............................................27 5.Fisheryevaluationprocess.....................................................................................29 5.1MSCstandard...................................................................................................29 5.2Risk-BasedFramework(RBF).........................................................................30 5.3PSAforlobster.................................................................................................30 5.4Assessmentprocess..........................................................................................30 5.5AssessmentofNormandyandJerseylobsterfishery.......................................31 5.6Stakeholderconsultations.................................................................................32 6.Scoring...................................................................................................................33 6.1Scoringmethodology.......................................................................................33 6.2Weighting.........................................................................................................33 7.Assessmentresults..................................................................................................35 7.1Overallresults..................................................................................................35 7.2Principle1........................................................................................................35 7.3Principle2........................................................................................................36 7.4Principle3........................................................................................................36 7.5Conditions........................................................................................................37 7.5.1TimetableforConditions..........................................................................37 7.5.2FormalConditions.....................................................................................37 7.5.3Defactoconditions....................................................................................39 7.5.4Recommendations.....................................................................................40 7.5.5ClientActionPlan.....................................................................................40 8.Chainofcustody.....................................................................................................41 8.1VesselsintheUnitofCertification..................................................................41 8.2Pointsoflanding...............................................................................................41 8.3Processingonboard.........................................................................................41 8.4Traceabilitywithinthefishery.........................................................................41 8.4.1Jersey.........................................................................................................41 8.4.2BasseNormandie.......................................................................................42 8.5Eligibilitydate..................................................................................................42 Annex1–Assessmenttree........................................................................................43 Annex2:SICAandPSATableswithscoresandjustifications.................................98 1.Principle1(targetspecies)SICAtables.............................................................98 2.Principle1(targetspecies)PSAtables............................................................107 3.Principle2(retainedandby-catchspecies)SICAtables.................................111 2147R02BApril2011 Annex3–ClientActionPlan..................................................................................117 Annex4–Summaryofstakeholdercomments.......................................................126 Annex4–Summaryofstakeholdercomments.......................................................126 Annex5–Peerreviewercommentswithresponses................................................128 Annex6-References...............................................................................................161 2147R02BApril2011 Report summary ThisistheFinalReportfortheMSCassessmentofthefisheryforEuropeanlobster (Homarusgammarus )co-managedbytheBailiwickofJersey(UK)andtheregionof BasseNormandie(lowerNormandy,France).Co-managementofthefisheryisalso shared by the region of Bretagne (Brittany, France) whose fishermen land a small proportionofthecatch;however,theydidnotchoosetoparticipateintheassessment. The assessment was carried out by the Certification Body MacAlister Elliott and PartnersLtd.onbehalfofthetwoclients:theComitéRegionaldePêcheMaritime (CRPM)deBasseNormandieandtheDepartmentofFisheries,StatesofJersey. Co-managementofthefisherytakesplacewithintheframeworkoftheGranvilleBay Treaty(betweentheUKandFrance),whichallowsforsharedaccesstoFrenchand Jerseywatersin GranvilleBay,withsharedmanagement of marine resources. The Granville Bay Treaty sets out objectives for fisheries in the shared Granville Bay Treatyarea.AgreementsmadeattheGranvilleBayTreatylevelareimplementedat the national or regional level via existing institutional structures. Enforcement is tackledatnationalorregionallevel,butdiscussedattheGranvilleBayTreatylevel.
Recommended publications
  • Download the Full Jersey ILSCA Report
    Jersey Integrated Landscape and Seascape Character Assessment Prepared for Government of Jersey by Fiona Fyfe Associates May 2020 www.fionafyfe.co.uk Jersey Integrated Landscape and Seascape Character Assessment Acknowledgements Acknowledgements The lead consultant would like to thank all members of the client team for their contributions to the project. Particular thanks are due to the Government of Jersey staff who accompanied field work and generously shared their time and local knowledge. This includes the skipper and crew of FPV Norman Le Brocq who provided transport to the reefs and marine areas. Thanks are also due to the many local stakeholders who contributed helpfully and willingly to the consultation workshop. Innovative and in-depth projects such as this require the combined skills of many professionals. This project had an exceptional consultant team and the lead consultant would like to thank them all for their superb contributions. She would particularly like to acknowledge the contribution of Tom Butlin (1982- 2020) for his outstanding and innovative work on the visibility mapping. • Jonathan Porter and Tom Butlin (Countryscape) • Carol Anderson (Carol Anderson Landscape Associates) • Nigel Buchan (Buchan Landscape Architecture) • Douglas Harman (Douglas Harman Landscape Planning) All photographs have been taken by Fiona Fyfe unless otherwise stated. Carol Anderson Landscape Associates ii FINAL May 2020 Prepared by Fiona Fyfe Associates for Government of Jersey Jersey Integrated Landscape and Seascape Character Assessment Foreword Ministerial Foreword It gives me tremendous pleasure to introduce the Jersey Integrated Landscape and Seascape Character Assessment which has been commissioned for the review of the 2011 Island Plan. Jersey’s coast and countryside is a unique and precious asset, which is treasured by islanders and is one of the key reasons why people visit the island.
    [Show full text]
  • Sediment Budget and Morphological Evolution in the Bay of Mont-Saint-Michel (Normandy, France): Aerial (LIDAR) and Terrestrial Laser Monitoring
    Littoral 2010, 12007 (2011) DOI:10.1051/litt/201112007 © Owned by the authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2011 Sediment budget and morphological evolution in the Bay of Mont-Saint-Michel (Normandy, France): aerial (LIDAR) and terrestrial laser monitoring Gluard Lucile1, [email protected] Levoy Franck1, Bretel Patrice1, Monfort Olivier1, 1 Morphodynamique Continentale et Côtière UMR6143 Université de Caen – CNRS 2-4, rue des Tilleuls – 14 000 CAEN - FRANCE Abstract We propose a study on the use of laser techniques to monitor altimetric variations in the tidal flat of the Bay of Mont-Saint-Michel. The Bay of Mont-Saint-Michel has been strongly anthropised. Because of impoldering, wandering rivers were not able to sap salt-meadow and modern tidal flooding of the Mont-Saint-Michel has lowered. Through modern studies and projects aimed at restoring the marine nature of the bay it appears that flushes are useful to discard sediment tending to silt the bay. The major aim of our work consists in the better understanding of the effect of the dam built recently (May 2009) in that purpose. Laser scanning is commonly used for topographic surveys and the generation of Digital Elevation Model (DEM). Repeating surveys, allow to quantify topographic changes and therefore sediment budgets. Our study is based on aerial topographic surveys of the intertidal zone acquired before the operational start up of the dam (in 1997, 2002, 2007 and February 2009). Sediment budgets computations confirm that the bay tends to accrete but at annual rates quite variable in time. The value computed between 2002 and 2007 is 2.3 times and 3.5 times smaller than the deposition rates computed for the 1997/2002 and 2007/2009 periods.
    [Show full text]
  • Sainte Apolline's Chapel St. Saviour's, Guernsey Conservation Plan
    Sainte Apolline's Chapel St. Saviour's, Guernsey Conservation Plan DRAFT Ref: 53511.03 December 2003 Wessex Archaeology Ste Apolline’s Chapel St Saviour’s Parish Guernsey Conservation Plan DRAFT Prepared for: States of Guernsey Heritage Committee Castle Cornet St Peter Port Guernsey GY1 1AU By: Wessex Archaeology Portway House Old Sarum Park Salisbury Wiltshire SP4 6EB In partnership with Carden & Godfrey Architects Environmental Design Associates Ltd AVN Conservation Consultancy & Dr John Mitchell Reference: 53511.03 18th December 2003 © The Trust for Wessex Archaeology Limited 2003 all rights reserved The Trust for Wessex Archaeology Limited is a Registered Charity No. 287786 Ste Apolline’s Chapel, St Saviour’s Parish, Guernsey Conservation Plan CONTENTS CHAPTER 1:INTRODUCTION.................................................................................1 1.1 Project Background ..........................................................................................1 1.2 Aims of the Conservation and Management Plan..........................................1 1.3 Methods..............................................................................................................2 CHAPTER 2:UNDERSTANDING .............................................................................7 2.1 Site Location......................................................................................................7 2.2 Development of the Chapel ..............................................................................7 2.3 The Condition of the
    [Show full text]
  • Orkney & Shetland Sea Kayaking
    South East England & Channel Islands Sea Kayaking Derek Hairon et al. Sheffield Lincoln Skegness 25 24 23 22 Nottingham The Wash Derby Hunstanton Cromer King’s Lynn Norwich Great Yarmouth Peterborough 21 Lowestoft Bury St Edmunds Northampton Cambridge 20 Ipswich Banbury Orford Ness Milton Keynes 19 Felixstowe Colchester 18 Luton The Naze Clacton-on-Sea Oxford Southend-on-Sea LONDON 15 16 17 Isle of Staines Sheppey 12 14 13 Croydon Margate Ramsgate 11 Dover South Foreland Crawley Folkestone 10 Winchester Calais Southampton Dungeness Hastings 1 5 Brighton 9 2 3 7 4 6 Boulogne Littlehampton Eastbourne Portsmouth Beachy Head Selsey Bill 8 Isle of Wight FRANCE 0 10 20 30 40 Kilometres Nautical Miles 0 20 South East England and Channel Islands Sea Kayaking Derek Hairon, Andy Levick, Mark Rainsley, Mark Gawler, Annie Davis, Guy Smith, John Brett and Kurt Finch Pesda Press www.pesdapress.com First published in Great Britain 2015 by Pesda Press Tan y Coed Canol, Ceunant Caernarfon, Gwynedd LL55 4RN Wales Copyright © 2015 Derek Hairon, Andy Levick, Mark Rainsley, Mark Gawler, Annie Davis, Guy Smith, John Brett and Kurt Finch. ISBN: 978-1-906095-50-5 The Authors assert the moral right to be identified as the authors of this work. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the Publisher. Maps by Bute Cartographic Printed and bound in Poland, www.lfbookservices.co.uk Introduction Though geographically close, the two areas covered in this guide are as different in character as it is possible to conceive.
    [Show full text]
  • Guernsey, 1814-1914: Migration in a Modernising Society
    GUERNSEY, 1814-1914: MIGRATION IN A MODERNISING SOCIETY Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Leicester by Rose-Marie Anne Crossan Centre for English Local History University of Leicester March, 2005 UMI Number: U594527 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U594527 Published by ProQuest LLC 2013. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 GUERNSEY, 1814-1914: MIGRATION IN A MODERNISING SOCIETY ROSE-MARIE ANNE CROSSAN Centre for English Local History University of Leicester March 2005 ABSTRACT Guernsey is a densely populated island lying 27 miles off the Normandy coast. In 1814 it remained largely French-speaking, though it had been politically British for 600 years. The island's only town, St Peter Port (which in 1814 accommodated over half the population) had during the previous century developed a thriving commercial sector with strong links to England, whose cultural influence it began to absorb. The rural hinterland was, by contrast, characterised by a traditional autarkic regime more redolent of pre­ industrial France. By 1914, the population had doubled, but St Peter Port's share had fallen to 43 percent.
    [Show full text]
  • A Working List of the Birds of the Channel Islands
    A Working List of the Birds of the Channel Islands Glyn Young, Mark Lawlor & Jill Watson This Working List includes details of all those bird species recorded in the (British) Channel Islands of Jersey (including Les Ecrehous and Les Minquiers), Guernsey (including Herm, Jethou and Lihou), Alderney (including Burhou and the Casquets) and Sark that have been accepted by the islands’ respective ornithological committees. Some recent records may not be included, as the relevant committee has not yet verified them. Further details of each species or of individual records can be found in published reports or by contacting the committees directly (see below). Records are updated annually after individual islands’ records committees have discussed the preceding year’s reports. The report is currently updated to 31st December 2008 and the authors are grateful to Mark Atkinson (Alderney), Mick Dryden (Jersey) and Tony Paintin (Jersey) for their help in maintaining this list. Status To date it has been difficult for the authors to standardise the status of birds in the four islands as interpretation has often differed and coverage has been patchy. As a guideline, however, the following categories have been used to describe status: Resident - recorded throughout the year Migrants and non-breeding visitors Breeding species Accidental - each record is recounted Occasional - has bred in most years Occasional - individuals out of season Rare - 1-10 pairs breed in most years Rare - 5-20 records Scarce - 11-50 pairs breed in most years Scarce - 21-50 individuals Common - 51-500 pairs breed in most years Common - 51-100 individuals Very common - 500+ pairs breed in most years Very common - 101-1,000 individuals Abundant - more than 1,000 pairs breed in Abundant - more than 1,000 most years individuals In practice, some of the categories have been further elaborated (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • H: Offshore Reefs and Islands
    H: OFFSHORE REEFS AND ISLANDS INTRODUCTION The Bailiwick of Jersey includes several groups of uninhabited islands and reefs which lie off the coast of the main island. Les Écréhous and Le Plateau des Minquiers lie approximately 9 km (6 miles) to the north-east and 20 km (13 miles) south of the main island respectively. To the west of Les Écréhous are the smaller reefs of Les Dirouilles and Paternosters. At high tide the reefs are little more than small rocky projections above water level while at low tide a vast area of fertile rock plateau is uncovered which, combined with the intertidal areas around mainland Jersey, effectively doubles the area of the Bailiwick. In 1956 the International Court of Justice at the Hague upheld Jersey's sovereignty over Les Écréhous and Le Plateau des Minquiers; a claim which had been disputed by France. This simple characterisation has been based on a desk study of existing information. The main sources are noted in Appendix 2. We would note that, to date, there is relatively little data on the offshore islands particularly with respect to archaeology, past land use and biodiversity and the reefs provide an important opportunity for future research. The following characterisation therefore represents a summary of present knowledge and information. Further research will considerably enhance our understanding of these important areas and increase their significance. The whole area of offshore reefs and islets is considered to form one main character type. There are nevertheless significant differences between the two main reefs of Les Écréhous and Le Plateau des Minquiers particularly in terms of their geographic location, relative isolation and biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Jersey Location Geography Climate
    Jersey Location The Bailiwick of Jersey is located in Europe and has a total area of 45 square miles. Jersey is the largest of the Channel Islands, which are located in the English Channel, off the coast of Normandy, France, and include Guernsey, Alderney, Sark, Herm, and Jethou. Jersey is 9 miles long and 5 miles wide. The island is 14 miles north of France and 100 miles south of Great Britain. It is bordered on the north by the English Channel and on the south by the Bay of Mont St Michel. Its political boundaries also include the reefs of Minquiers and the Ecrehous. (Jones) Geography The geography of the island is mainly gentle and rolling, with rougher hills along the northern coast with the English Channel. The highest point is 143 meters, while sea level is the island’s lowest point. The island’s location in between the Bay of Mont St Michel and the English Channel gives the island tidal ranges of over 40 feet, among the largest range in the world. Most of the island is a plateau which sweeps towards sea level as one travels south. The west end of the island features St Ouen’s Pond, which is Jersey’s largest fresh water source. The interior of the island is home to pastoral grazing lands and home to most of Jersey’s agriculture. Climate Jersey’s climate is quite temperate, due to its location in the English Channel. The island is the sunniest place in the British Isles with an average of over 1,951 hours per year.
    [Show full text]
  • English Channel
    PUB. 191 SAILING DIRECTIONS (ENROUTE) ★ ENGLISH CHANNEL ★ Prepared and published by the NATIONAL GEOSPATIAL-INTELLIGENCE AGENCY Bethesda, Maryland © COPYRIGHT 2006 BY THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT NO COPYRIGHT CLAIMED UNDER TITLE 17 U.S.C. 2006 TWELFTH EDITION For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: http://bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; DC area (202) 512-1800 Fax: (202) 512-2250 Mail Stop: SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-0001 Preface 0.0 Pub. 191, Sailing Directions (Enroute) English Channel, 0.0 Courses.—Courses are true, and are expressed in the same Twelfth Edition, 2006, is issued for use in conjunction with manner as bearings. The directives “steer” and “make good” a Pub. 140, Sailing Directions (Planning Guide) North Atlantic course mean, without exception, to proceed from a point of Ocean, Baltic Sea, North Sea, and the Mediterranean Sea. origin along a track having the identical meridianal angle as the Companion volumes are Pubs. 192, 193, 194, and 195. designated course. Vessels following the directives must allow for every influence tending to cause deviation from such track, 0.0 This publication has been corrected to 9 September 2006, and navigate so that the designated course is continuously including Notice to Mariners No. 36 of 2006. being made good. 0.0 Currents.—Current directions are the true directions toward Explanatory Remarks which currents set. 0.0 Dangers.—As a rule outer dangers are fully described, but 0.0 Sailing Directions are published by the National Geospatial- inner dangers which are well-charted are, for the most part, Intelligence Agency (NGA), under the authority of Department omitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Observation and Modelling of Natural Retention Structures In
    Journal of Marine Systems Archimer, archive institutionnelle de l’Ifremer Vol. 63, Issues 3-4 , Dec. 2006, Pages 244-256 http://www.ifremer.fr/docelec/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2006.05.004 © 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved ailable on the publisher Web site Observation and modelling of natural retention structures in the English Channel Alain Ménesguen*,a, and Francis Gohina aDépartement Dynamiques de l'Environnement Côtier, Laboratoire Ecologie benthique, IFREMER/Centre de Brest, 29280 Plouzané, France *: Corresponding author : tel: 33 2 98 22 43 34 ; fax: 33 2 98 22 45 48 ; e-mail: [email protected] blisher-authenticated version is av Abstract: Accumulation of heat, or dissolved substances (nutrients, pollutants, etc.), or fine suspended particles in a water body is a key process in the functioning of aquatic ecosystems and their resistance to perturbations. In complex and wide open environments such as marine ecosystems, net accumulation is not only linked to the local renewal capacity of the water body, but also to the partial recirculation of water due to convective cells of various sizes. The English Channel, which can be considered as mainly dominated by tidal movements, exhibits such a complex quasi-permanent long-term circulation, made of a central “river” bordered with a lot of nested gyres. Here, we show that structures visible on satellite images of SST (Sea Surface Temperature), chlorophyll and SPIM (Suspended Particulate Inorganic Matter) can be explained by steady state distributions of tracers having various half-life durations, which can be computed using a simple technique of regularly distributed micro-injection in the permanent flow field.
    [Show full text]
  • Performing Jurisdictional Politics in the Bailiwick of Guernsey: a Study
    Transformations issue 35 (2021) Performing Jurisdictional Politics in the www.transformationsjournal.org Bailiwick of Guernsey: A Study of Anthems and ISSN 1444-3775 Stamps AUTHOR BIO Henry Johnson Born in Jersey in the Channel Islands, Henry Johnson is now ABSTRACT Professor of Music at the University of Otago, New ZealanD. His research interests The Bailiwick of Guernsey is a British jurisdiction in the Channel Islands are in Island StuDies and Asian comprising several islands and forming a binary with the neighbouring Studies. He has undertaken Bailiwick of Jersey. The Bailiwick is an archipelago of administrative similitude fieldwork on many island and island-based jurisdictional difference. It is a dependency of the British locations in Europe, Asia, Crown with a sense of independence and with identity and jurisdiction Australasia and the Pacific. His constructed within, between and across several island spheres. This is a setting recent publications incluDe Global of anomalous/autonomous territories, with the Bailiwick having a distinct Glam and Popular Music geography of overlapping political jurisdictions that exhibit an administrative (Routledge, 2016), Migration, dialectics of place with islandness and archipelago-ness at the core of identity Education and Translation making. This article asks: How do the islands within the Bailiwick of Guernsey (Routledge, 2020), and Nenes’ perform jurisdictional politics as territorial units? As well as discussing the Koza Dabasa (Bloomsbury, 2021). He is Associate Director of the islands’ top-down administrative structures, distinct emblems of politicised Centre for Global Migrations at island identity in the form of anthems and postage stamps are considered the University of Otago. regarding the ways they contribute to island performativity and identity construction within their territorial setting.
    [Show full text]
  • The Minquiers and Écréhous in Spatial Context: Contemporary Issues and Cross Perspectives on Border Islands, Reefs and Rocks
    Island Studies Journal , Vol. 10, No. 2, 2015, pp. 163-180 The Minquiers and Écréhous in spatial context: Contemporary issues and cross perspectives on border islands, reefs and rocks Christian Fleury ESO (Espaces et Sociétés) Caen, Université de Caen-Normandie, France [email protected] and Henry Johnson University of Otago, New Zealand [email protected] ABSTRACT: The Minquiers and Écréhous reefs are located in different parts of the Gulf of St Malo between the British island of Jersey and the French mainland. As a part of the Bailiwick of Jersey, they are geographically very close to the international sea border between Jersey and France, and have had a history of disputed sovereignty. Due to their respective geographical locations and histories, the Minquiers and Écréhous are important sites for the field of Island Studies because of their existence as “border islands”. This article offers a study of these reefs in their spatial context of land and sea, discussing contemporary issues, including fishing, environmentalism and tourism, and offering cross perspectives in terms of their political, economic and cultural connections with Jersey and France. They exist in a context of immense spatial change with substantial tidal ebbs and flows, and between mainlands and historically contested maritime terrains. Such a study helps show how the Minquiers and Écréhous occupy an inbetween space (land, sea and nations), which resulted in international agreements in 2000 that confirmed both the maritime boundary separating France and Jersey, and the areas agreed on as common waters for fishing purposes within Jersey’s jurisdiction. In this setting, this paper offers a critical discussion on the nature of “islands inbetween” (including all the Channel Islands), where land and sea are interconnected as a result of nature, politics, historical fishing rights and leisure activities.
    [Show full text]