Coleoptera: Cerambycidae)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) CONTRIBUCIÓN AL CONOCIMIENTO DE LOS CERAMBÍCIDOS DE LAS SIERRAS DE TAXCO-HUAUTLA, MÉXICO (COLEOPTERA: CERAMBYCIDAE) Contribution to the knowledge of the longhorned beetles from Sierras de Taxco-Huautla, México (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) Ma. Magdalena Ordóñez-Reséndiz y Geovanni Rodríguez-Mirón. Museo de Zoología, Facultad de Estudios Superiores Zaragoza, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Av. Guelatao 66, Ejército de Oriente, Iztapalapa, D.F. CP 09230, México. E-mail: [email protected]. Palabras Clave: Cerambycidae, Sierras de Taxco-Huautla, México. Introducción En México, la selva baja caducifolia (SBC) o bosque tropical caducifolio (Miranda y Hernández-X, 1963; Rzedowski, 1978) cubría el 17% del territorio nacional; sin embargo, las actividades humanas han perturbado severamente estas comunidades, principalmente en zonas de lomeríos (García Romero et al., 2005). Estudios sobre plantas (Rzedowski, 1991; Pineda García et al., 2007) y vertebrados terrestres (Ceballos y García, 1995) resaltan la alta diversidad y niveles de endemismo de la SBC; en contraste, es poco lo que se conoce sobre los invertebrados de estas comunidades, en particular los coleópteros. Noguera y colaboradores (2002) realizaron un estudio de la familia Cerambycidae en la Reserva de la Biosfera Sierra de Huautla (REBIOSH), al sur del estado de Morelos. En este trabajo se dan a conocer las especies de cerambícidos presentes en la parte occidental de la REBIOSH y en la Sierra de Taxco, con la cual forma una entidad geológica continua, reconocida por la Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO) como Región Terrestre Prioritaria Sierras de Taxco-Huautla (RTP 120) (Arriaga et al., 2000). Materiales y Método Trabajo de campo. Durante 52 días, entre mayo de 2003 a octubre de 2008, se realizaron recolectas diurnas y vespertinas de cerambícidos en 27 localidades de las Sierras de Taxco- Huautla (RTP 120) y sus alrededores, 22 de Guerrero y cinco de Morelos (Fig. 1). Mediante las técnicas de barrido y bareo se capturaron adultos sobre la vegetación herbácea, arbustiva y arbórea; asimismo, se revisaron troncos en descomposición. Los ejemplares se sacrificaron con acetato de etilo y se rotularon con los datos geográficos correspondientes. Determinación taxonómica. Las morfoespecies recolectadas fueron determinadas a género o especie mediante literatura especializada (Linsley y Chemsak, 1995; Yanega, 1996; Chemsak y Noguera, 1998; Turnbow y Thomas, 2002; Monné y Bezark, 2008; Bezark, 2008) y con el apoyo del Dr. Felipe Noguera Martínez de la Estación de Biología Chamela (UNAM). Resultados y Discusión Se registraron 97 especies de Cerambycidae, 78 se determinaron a nivel específico, dos afines a especie y 17 a género (Cuadro 1). La riqueza de especies obtenida fue menor a la reportada en otras áreas de SBC, como Chamela, Jalisco (306 especies) (Chemsak y Noguera, 1996), Sierra de Huautla, Morelos (153 especies) (Noguera et al., 2002), El Aguacero, Chiapas 952 (203 especies) (Toledo et al., 2002) y San Buenaventura, Jalisco (109 especies) (Noguera et al., 2007). Los datos obtenidos en este proyecto son resultado de recolectas directas, por lo que es necesario implementar métodos de captura indirectos para tratar de registrar la diversidad de cerambícidos que habita en cada uno de los sitios estudiados. De los taxones reconocidos a nivel específico, 36 se citan por primera vez para el estado de Guerrero y siete para el estado de Morelos (Cuadro 1). Es probable que surjan nuevas especies de los taxones determinados a género; sin embargo, la problemática taxonómica de algunos grupos y la carencia de información sobre las especies mexicanas, imposibilitan la labor taxonómica. C Figura 1. Sitios de recolecta en las Sierras de Taxco-Huautla. La mayoría de los cerambícidos mostraron una distribución restringida dentro de la zona de estudio, 66 especies (68% del total) se registraron en una o dos localidades. Aunque estos datos sugieren la presencia de endemismos, cabe recordar que el conocimiento biogeográfico del grupo es incipiente (Toledo y Corona, 2006) y que gran parte de México no ha sido explorado de manera sistemática, prueba de ellos son los escasos estudios faunísticos realizados en SBC (Chemsak y Noguera, 1996; Noguera et al., 2002; Toledo et al., 2002; Noguera et al., 2007) y los nuevos registros estatales que se señalan en este trabajo (Cuadro 1). Mecas obereoides Bates se encontró en diez de los sitios visitados y Tylosis puncticollis Bates en nueve sitios, lo cual se atribuye a su amplia distribución en el territorio nacional (Monné y Bezark, 2008; Bezark, 2008). La localidad El Naranjo (sitio 8, Figura 1) se distinguió por presentar la mayor riqueza específica del área con 32 especies, seguida de Los Amates con 14 especies (sitio 15), Las Vías con 13 especies (sitio 14) y Palmillas con 12 especies (sitio 16), todas en el estado de Guerrero. 953 Cuadro 1. Especies de Cerambycidae de las Sierras de Taxco-Huautla. *=nuevo registro para Guerrero, ♦=nuevo registro para Morelos. RIONINAE 28. Chemsakiella sp. Macrotomini 29. Deltaspis alutacea Bates, 1885* 1. Nothopleurus lobigenis Bates, 1884 30. Deltaspis auromarginata Audinet-Serville, 1834 CERAMBYCINAE 31. Deltaspis rubriventris Bates, 1880 Callichromatini 32. Deltaspis variabilis Bates, 1891♦ 2. Plinthocoelium chilensis (Blanchard en Gray, 33. Gambria bicolor (Chevrolat, 1862)* 1851)* 34. Gambria leucozona Bates, 1880* Clytini 35. Ischnocnemis caerulescens Bates, 1885 3. Dexithea klugii (Laporte & Gory, 1935) 36. Ischnocnemis costipennis Thomson, 1864 4. Ochraethes sommeri (Chevrolat, 1835)* 37. Ischnocnemis cyaneus Bates, 1892* 5. Plagionotus astecus (Chevrolat, 1860) 38. Ischnocnemis sexualis Bates, 1885* 6. Tanyochraethes cinereolus (Bates, 1892) 39. Lophalia sp. Eburiini 40. Metaleptus pyrrhulus Bates, 1880* 7. Eburia baroni Bates, 1892 41. Muscidora tricolor Thomson, 1864 8. Eburia laticollis Bates, 1880* 42. Parevander xanthomelas (Guérin-Méneville, Elaphidiini 1844)♦ 9. Orwellion gibbulum gibbulum (Bates, 1880) 43. Sphaenothecus aff. argenteus Bates, 1880 10. Psyrassa oaxacae Toledo, 2002♦ 44. Sphaenothecus bivittata Dupont, 1838 11. Psyrassa sp. 45. Sphaenothecus picticornis Bates, 1880* 12. Stenosphenus protensus Bates, 1880 46. Sphaenothecus trilineatus Dupont, 1838* 13. Stenosphenus rufipes Bates, 1872 47. Stenaspis verticalis verticalis Audinet-Serville, 14. Stenosphenus sp. 1834* Hesperophanini 48. Stenobatyle eburata (Chevrolat, 1862) 15. Austrophanes robustum Chemsak & Linsley, 49. Trachyderes mandibularis mandibularis 1963 Dupont en Audinet-Serville, 1834*♦ Hexoplonini 50. Tylosis puncticollis Bates, 1885 16. Hexoplon calligrammum Bates, 1885 17. Stenygra histrio Audinet-Serville, 1834 LEPTURINAE Lissonotini Lepturini 18. Lissonotus flavocinctus multifasciatus 51. Meloemorpha aliena (Bates, 1880)* Dupont, 1836 52. Strangalia doyeni Chemsak & Linsley, 1976* Oxycoleini 53. Strangalia sp. 1 19. Oxycoleus gratiosus (Bates, 1885)* 54. Strangalia sp. 2 Rhinotragini 20. Acyphoderes cribricollis Bates, 1892 LAMIINAE 21. Odontocera aff. nevermanni Fisher, 1930 Acanthocinini Rhopalophorini 55. Canidia canescens (Dillon, 1955)♦ 22. Rhopalophora cupricollis Guérin-Méneville, 56. Canidia giesberti Wappes & Lingafelter, 1844 2005* 23. Rhopalophora tenuis (Chevrolat, 1855) 57. Canidia spinicornis (Bates, 1881) Trachyderini 58. Eutrichillus comus (Bates, 1881) 24. Ancylocera michelbacheri Chemsak, 1963* 59. Lagocheirus obsoletus Thomson, 1860 25. Batyle laevicollis Bates, 1892* 60. Pseudastylopsis pini (Schaeffer, 1905)* 26. Ceralocyna cribricollis (Bates, 1885) 61. Pseudastylopsis sp. 27. Chemsakiella virgulata Chemsak, 1987* 62. Sternidius naeviicornis (Bates, 1885)* 954 63. Sternidius sp. 1 Lamiini 64. Sternidius sp. 2 80. Mimolochus hoefneri (Thomson, 1865) 65. Urographis sp. 81. Taeniotes luciani Thomson, 1859* Acanthoderini Onciderini 66. Acanthoderes funeraria Bates, 1861* 82. Taricanus truquii Thomson, 1868* 67. Aegomorphus albosignus Chemsak & Phytoeciini Noguera, 1993* 83. Mecas cinerea (Newman, 1840)* 68. Aegomorphus chamelae Chemsak & Giesbert, 84. Mecas marmorata Gahan, 1892 1986*♦ 85. Mecas obereoides Bates, 1881 69. Aegomorphus sp. 1 86. Mecas rotundicollis Thomson, 1868 70. Aegomorphus sp. 2 Pogonocherini 71. Peritapnia nudicornis (Bates, 1885)* 87. Alphomorphus vandykei (Linsley, 1930) 72. Peritapnia pilosa Chemsak & Linsley, 1978♦ 88. Poliaenus hesperus Chemsak & Linsley, 1988 Apomecynini Pteropliini 73. Adetus sp. 1 89. Ataxia sp. 74. Adetus sp. 2 90. Epectasis sp. 75. Dorcasta dasycera (Erichson en Schomburg, Tetraopini 1848)* 91. Phaea biplagiata Chemsak, 1977 Desmiphorini 92. Phaea bryani Chemsak, 1999* 76. Estoloides sp. 93. Phaea mirabilis Bates, 1874* Hemilophini 94. Phaea rufiventris Bates, 1872* 77. Alampyris quadricollis Bates, 1881* 95. Phaea tenuata Bates, 1872* 78. Essostrutha binotata Bates, 1881 96. Phaea vitticollis Bates, 1872* 79. Essostrutha laeta (Newman, 1840) 97. Tetraopes discoideus LeConte, 1858 De acuerdo a la clasificación seguida por Monné y Bezark (2008), la lista obtenida en este estudio comprende representantes de cuatro subfamilias, 24 tribus y 61 géneros. Las subfamilias más diversas fueron Cerambycinae y Lamiinae, como sucede para México y América (Noguera y Chemsak, 1996). Cerambycinae con 50 especies en 33 géneros, presentó la mayor riqueza específica (51.5% del total), seguida de Lamiinae con 45 especies (46.4%) en 24 géneros. Únicamente el 34% de las especies registradas (33 taxones) se distribuyen también en la
Recommended publications
  • Elytra Reduction May Affect the Evolution of Beetle Hind Wings
    Zoomorphology https://doi.org/10.1007/s00435-017-0388-1 ORIGINAL PAPER Elytra reduction may affect the evolution of beetle hind wings Jakub Goczał1 · Robert Rossa1 · Adam Tofilski2 Received: 21 July 2017 / Revised: 31 October 2017 / Accepted: 14 November 2017 © The Author(s) 2017. This article is an open access publication Abstract Beetles are one of the largest and most diverse groups of animals in the world. Conversion of forewings into hardened shields is perceived as a key adaptation that has greatly supported the evolutionary success of this taxa. Beetle elytra play an essential role: they minimize the influence of unfavorable external factors and protect insects against predators. Therefore, it is particularly interesting why some beetles have reduced their shields. This rare phenomenon is called brachelytry and its evolution and implications remain largely unexplored. In this paper, we focused on rare group of brachelytrous beetles with exposed hind wings. We have investigated whether the elytra loss in different beetle taxa is accompanied with the hind wing shape modification, and whether these changes are similar among unrelated beetle taxa. We found that hind wings shape differ markedly between related brachelytrous and macroelytrous beetles. Moreover, we revealed that modifications of hind wings have followed similar patterns and resulted in homoplasy in this trait among some unrelated groups of wing-exposed brachelytrous beetles. Our results suggest that elytra reduction may affect the evolution of beetle hind wings. Keywords Beetle · Elytra · Evolution · Wings · Homoplasy · Brachelytry Introduction same mechanism determines wing modification in all other insects, including beetles. However, recent studies have The Coleoptera order encompasses almost the quarter of all provided evidence that formation of elytra in beetles is less currently known animal species (Grimaldi and Engel 2005; affected by Hox gene than previously expected (Tomoyasu Hunt et al.
    [Show full text]
  • (Coleoptera) of Peru Miguel A
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida 2-29-2012 Preliminary checklist of the Cerambycidae, Disteniidae, and Vesperidae (Coleoptera) of Peru Miguel A. Monné Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, [email protected] Eugenio H. Nearns University of New Mexico, [email protected] Sarah C. Carbonel Carril Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Peru, [email protected] Ian P. Swift California State Collection of Arthropods, [email protected] Marcela L. Monné Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Part of the Entomology Commons Monné, Miguel A.; Nearns, Eugenio H.; Carbonel Carril, Sarah C.; Swift, Ian P.; and Monné, Marcela L., "Preliminary checklist of the Cerambycidae, Disteniidae, and Vesperidae (Coleoptera) of Peru" (2012). Insecta Mundi. Paper 717. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/717 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. INSECTA MUNDI A Journal of World Insect Systematics 0213 Preliminary checklist of the Cerambycidae, Disteniidae, and Vesperidae (Coleoptera) of Peru Miguel A. Monné Museu Nacional Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Quinta da Boa Vista São Cristóvão, 20940-040 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil Eugenio H. Nearns Department of Biology Museum of Southwestern Biology University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001, USA Sarah C. Carbonel Carril Departamento de Entomología Museo de Historia Natural Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos Avenida Arenales 1256, Lima, Peru Ian P.
    [Show full text]
  • Longhorn Beetles (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) Christian Cocquempot, Ake Lindelöw
    Longhorn beetles (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) Christian Cocquempot, Ake Lindelöw To cite this version: Christian Cocquempot, Ake Lindelöw. Longhorn beetles (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae). Alien terrestrial arthropods of Europe, 4 (1), Pensoft Publishers, 2010, BioRisk, 978-954-642-554-6. 10.3897/biorisk.4.56. hal-02823535 HAL Id: hal-02823535 https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02823535 Submitted on 6 Jun 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. A peer-reviewed open-access journal BioRisk 4(1): 193–218 (2010)Longhorn beetles (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae). Chapter 8.1 193 doi: 10.3897/biorisk.4.56 RESEARCH ARTICLE BioRisk www.pensoftonline.net/biorisk Longhorn beetles (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) Chapter 8.1 Christian Cocquempot1, Åke Lindelöw2 1 INRA UMR Centre de Biologie et de Gestion des Populations, CBGP, (INRA/IRD/CIRAD/Montpellier SupAgro), Campus international de Baillarguet, CS 30016, 34988 Montférrier-sur-Lez, France 2 Swedish university of agricultural sciences, Department of ecology. P.O. Box 7044, S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden Corresponding authors: Christian Cocquempot ([email protected]), Åke Lindelöw (Ake.Linde- [email protected]) Academic editor: David Roy | Received 28 December 2009 | Accepted 21 May 2010 | Published 6 July 2010 Citation: Cocquempot C, Lindelöw Å (2010) Longhorn beetles (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae).
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Lamiinae) with Description of a Species with Non‑Retractile Parameres
    ARTICLE Two new genera of Desmiphorini (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Lamiinae) with description of a species with non‑retractile parameres Francisco Eriberto de Lima Nascimento¹² & Antonio Santos-Silva¹³ ¹ Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Museu de Zoologia (MZUSP). São Paulo, SP, Brasil. ² ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5047-8921. E-mail: [email protected] ³ ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7128-1418. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. In this study, two new genera of Desmiphorini (Lamiinae) are proposed: Cleidaria gen. nov., to include Cleidaria cleidae sp. nov. from the state of Chiapas in Mexico, and Obscenoides gen. nov. for Desmiphora (D.) compta Martins & Galileo, 2005. The shape of tarsal claws of Cleidaria cleidae sp. nov. (abruptly narrowed from basal half) is so far, not found in any current genera of the tribe. With respect to Obscenoides compta (Martins & Galileo, 2005) comb. nov., the genitalia of males have an unusual shape with non-retractile parameres. The character combination related to this genital structure is unknown to us in other species in the family, and hypotheses about its function are suggested. Key-Words. Genital morphology; Longhorned beetles; New taxa; Taxonomy. INTRODUCTION the current definitions of some tribes, especially based on the works of Breuning do not take into Lamiinae (Cerambycidae), also known as flat- account adaptive convergences and use superfi- faced longhorns, with more than 21,000 described cial characters to subordinate taxa. species in about 3,000 genera and 87 tribes is Among these tribes, Desmiphorini Thomson, the largest subfamily of Cerambycidae occurring 1860 is not an exception, and its “boundaries” are worldwide (Tavakilian & Chevillotte, 2019).
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnoentomological and Distributional Notes on Cerambycidae and Other Coleoptera of Guerrero and Puebla,Mexico
    The Coleopterists Bulletin, 71(2): 301–314. 2017. ETHNOENTOMOLOGICAL AND DISTRIBUTIONAL NOTES ON CERAMBYCIDAE AND OTHER COLEOPTERA OF GUERRERO AND PUEBLA,MEXICO JONATHAN D. AMITH Research Affiliate, Department of Anthropology, Gettysburg College, Campus Box 2895, Gettysburg, PA 17325, U.S.A. and Research Associate, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013-7012, U.S.A. AND STEVEN W. LINGAFELTER Systematic Entomology Laboratory, Agriculture Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution,Washington, DC 20013-7012, U.S.A. Current address: 8920 South Bryerly Ct., Hereford, AZ 85615, U.S.A. ABSTRACT This article presents both ethnoentomological notes on Nahuatl and Mixtec language terms as they are applied to Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) and distributional records for species collected during three projects carried out in the states of Guerrero and Puebla, Mexico. Some comparative data from other Mesoamerican and Native American languages are discussed. Indigenous common names are mapped onto current taxonomic nomenclature, and an analysis is offered of the logical basis for Indigenous classification: the exclusion of some cerambycids and the inclusion of other beetles in the nominal native “cerambycid” category. New state distributional records for the Cerambycidae collected in this study are offered for Guerrero: Bebelis picta Pascoe, Callipogon senex Dupont, Neocompsa macrotricha Martins, Olenosus ser- rimanus Bates, Ornithia mexicana zapotensis Tippmann, Stenygra histrio Audinet-Serville, Strongylaspis championi Bates, Lissonotus flavocinctus puncticollis Bates, and Nothopleurus lobigenis Bates; and Puebla: Juiaparus mexicanus (Thomson), Ptychodes guttulatus Dillon and Dillon, and Steirastoma senex White. Key Words: linguistics, etymology, Nahuatl, Mixtec, longhorned beetle, wood-borer DOI.org/10.1649/0010-065X-71.2.301 The present article emerges from two language shapes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Earliest Record of Fossil Solid-Wood-Borer Larvae—Immature Beetles in 99 Million-Year-Old Myanmar Amber
    Palaeoentomology 004 (4): 390–404 ISSN 2624-2826 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/pe/ PALAEOENTOMOLOGY Copyright © 2021 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 2624-2834 (online edition) PE https://doi.org/10.11646/palaeoentomology.4.4.14 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9F96DA9A-E2F3-466A-A623-0D1D6689D345 The earliest record of fossil solid-wood-borer larvae—immature beetles in 99 million-year-old Myanmar amber CAROLIN HAUG1, 2, *, GIDEON T. HAUG1, ANA ZIPPEL1, SERITA VAN DER WAL1 & JOACHIM T. HAUG1, 2 1Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Biocenter, Großhaderner Str. 2, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany 2GeoBio-Center at LMU, Richard-Wagner-Str. 10, 80333 München, Germany �[email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9208-4229 �[email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6963-5982 �[email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6509-4445 �[email protected] https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7426-8777 �[email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8254-8472 *Corresponding author Abstract different plants, including agriculturally important ones (e.g., Potts et al., 2010; Powney et al., 2019). On the Interactions between animals and plants represent an other hand, many representatives exploit different parts of important driver of evolution. Especially the group Insecta plants, often causing severe damage up to the loss of entire has an enormous impact on plants, e.g., by consuming them. crops (e.g., Metcalf, 1996; Evans et al., 2007; Oliveira et Among beetles, the larvae of different groups (Buprestidae, Cerambycidae, partly Eucnemidae) bore into wood and are al., 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Chicago Joins New York in Battle with the Asian Longhorned Beetle Therese M
    Chicago Joins New York in Battle with the Asian Longhorned Beetle Therese M. Poland, Robert A. Haack, Toby R. Petrice USDA Forest Service, North Central Research Station, 1407 S. Harrison Rd., Rm. 220, E. Lansing, MI 48823 The Asian longhorned beetle, Anoplophora glabripennis (Motschulsky), was positively iden- would follow New York’s lead tified on 13 July 1998 attacking trees in an area of and that infested trees would northern Chicago known as Ravenswood. Previ- be cut, chipped, burned and ously, the only known North American occur- replaced by new trees at the rence of this Asian cerambycid beetle was in the city’s expense. Amityville area and the Brooklyn area of Long The city of Chicago ben- Island, New York, where it was discovered in efited greatly from New August 1996 (Haack et al. 1996, Cavey et al. York’s experience in imple- 1998). In New York, this woodborer has attacked menting its eradication program. With an excellent species of maple (Acer), horsechestnut (Aesculus well as 1 square mile each in Addison and in leadership team and organization, the city of hippocastanum), birch (Betula), poplar (Populus), Summit. Extensive surveys were conducted out Chicago obtained public cooperation and support willow (Salix), and elm (Ulmus) (Haack et al. to 1 ¼ miles past the outer boundary of known for the eradication program from the outset. The 1997). Because of the potential for longterm infested trees at all three locations. Survey crews media provided excellent, factual and accurate ecological and economic damage an aggressive were composed of APHIS inspectors, federal, information through extensive television, newspa- eradication program that involves locating, re- state and city employees as well as APHIS trained per, and radio coverage.
    [Show full text]
  • Consequences of Evolutionary Transitions in Changing Photic Environments
    bs_bs_banner Austral Entomology (2017) 56,23–46 Review Consequences of evolutionary transitions in changing photic environments Simon M Tierney,1* Markus Friedrich,2,3 William F Humphreys,1,4,5 Therésa M Jones,6 Eric J Warrant7 and William T Wcislo8 1School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia. 2Department of Biological Sciences, Wayne State University, 5047 Gullen Mall, Detroit, MI 48202, USA. 3Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Wayne State University, School of Medicine, 540 East Canfield Avenue, Detroit, MI 48201, USA. 4Terrestrial Zoology, Western Australian Museum, Locked Bag 49, Welshpool DC, WA 6986, Australia. 5School of Animal Biology, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA 6907, Australia. 6Department of Zoology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic. 3010, Australia. 7Department of Biology, Lund University, Sölvegatan 35, S-22362 Lund, Sweden. 8Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, PO Box 0843-03092, Balboa, Ancón, Republic of Panamá. Abstract Light represents one of the most reliable environmental cues in the biological world. In this review we focus on the evolutionary consequences to changes in organismal photic environments, with a specific focus on the class Insecta. Particular emphasis is placed on transitional forms that can be used to track the evolution from (1) diurnal to nocturnal (dim-light) or (2) surface to subterranean (aphotic) environments, as well as (3) the ecological encroachment of anthropomorphic light on nocturnal habitats (artificial light at night). We explore the influence of the light environment in an integrated manner, highlighting the connections between phenotypic adaptations (behaviour, morphology, neurology and endocrinology), molecular genetics and their combined influence on organismal fitness.
    [Show full text]
  • Additions and Deletions to the Known Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) of Bolivia
    INSECTA MUNDI A Journal of World Insect Systematics 0150 Additions and deletions to the known Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) of Bolivia James E. Wappes American Coleoptera Museum 8734 Paisano Pass San Antonio, Texas 78255-3523 Steven W. Lingafelter Systematic Entomology Laboratory Plant Sciences Institute, Agriculture Research Service United States Department of Agriculture National Museum of Natural History Washington, DC 20013-7012 Robert Perger Escuela de Biología & Centro de Investigación en Ciencias del Mar y Limnología (CIMAR) Universidad de Costa Rica 2060 San José, Costa Rica Date of Issue: March 11, 2011 CENTER FOR SYSTEMATIC ENTOMOLOGY, INC., Gainesville, FL James E. Wappes, Steven W. Lingafelter, and Robert Perger Additions and deletions to the known Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) of Bolivia Insecta Mundi 0150: 1-8 Published in 2011 by Center for Systematic Entomology, Inc. P. O. Box 141874 Gainesville, FL 32614-1874 U. S. A. http://www.centerforsystematicentomology.org/ Insecta Mundi is a journal primarily devoted to insect systematics, but articles can be published on any non-marine arthropod. Topics considered for publication include systematics, taxonomy, nomencla- ture, checklists, faunal works, and natural history. Insecta Mundi will not consider works in the applied sciences (i.e. medical entomology, pest control research, etc.), and no longer publishes book re- views or editorials. Insecta Mundi publishes original research or discoveries in an inexpensive and timely manner, distributing them free via open access on the internet on the date of publication. Insecta Mundi is referenced or abstracted by several sources including the Zoological Record, CAB Abstracts, etc. Insecta Mundi is published irregularly throughout the year, with completed manu- scripts assigned an individual number.
    [Show full text]
  • USDA Interagency Research Forum on Invasive Species
    United States Department of Agriculture US Forest Service Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team FHTET-2017-06 November 2017 The abstracts were submitted in an electronic format and were edited to achieve only a uniform format and typeface. Each contributor is responsible for the accuracy and content of his or her own paper. Statements of the contributors from outside the U. S. Department of Agriculture may not necessarily reflect the policy of the Department. Some participants did not submit abstracts, and so their presentations are not represented here. Cover graphic: “Spotted lantern fly, a new pest from Asia” by Melody Keena The use of trade, firm, or corporation names in this publication is for the information and convenience of the reader. Such use does not constitute an official endorsement or approval by the U. S. Department of Agriculture of any product or service to the exclusion of others that may be suitable. CAUTION: Pesticide Precautionary Statement PESTICIDES References to pesticides appear in some technical papers represented by these abstracts. Publication of these statements does not constitute endorsement or recommendation of them by the conference sponsors, nor does it imply that uses discussed have been registered. Use of most pesticides is regulated by state and federal laws. Applicable registrations must be obtained from the appropriate regulatory agency prior to their use. CAUTION: Pesticides can be injurious to humans, domestic animals, desirable plants, and fish or other wildlife- -if they are not handled or applied properly. Use all pesticides selectively and carefully. Follow recommended practices for the disposal of surplus pesticides and pesticide containers.
    [Show full text]
  • Section IV – Guideline for the Texas Priority Species List
    Section IV – Guideline for the Texas Priority Species List Associated Tables The Texas Priority Species List……………..733 Introduction For many years the management and conservation of wildlife species has focused on the individual animal or population of interest. Many times, directing research and conservation plans toward individual species also benefits incidental species; sometimes entire ecosystems. Unfortunately, there are times when highly focused research and conservation of particular species can also harm peripheral species and their habitats. Management that is focused on entire habitats or communities would decrease the possibility of harming those incidental species or their habitats. A holistic management approach would potentially allow species within a community to take care of themselves (Savory 1988); however, the study of particular species of concern is still necessary due to the smaller scale at which individuals are studied. Until we understand all of the parts that make up the whole can we then focus more on the habitat management approach to conservation. Species Conservation In terms of species diversity, Texas is considered the second most diverse state in the Union. Texas has the highest number of bird and reptile taxon and is second in number of plants and mammals in the United States (NatureServe 2002). There have been over 600 species of bird that have been identified within the borders of Texas and 184 known species of mammal, including marine species that inhabit Texas’ coastal waters (Schmidly 2004). It is estimated that approximately 29,000 species of insect in Texas take up residence in every conceivable habitat, including rocky outcroppings, pitcher plant bogs, and on individual species of plants (Riley in publication).
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa, Catalogue of Family-Group Names in Cerambycidae
    Zootaxa 2321: 1–80 (2009) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Monograph ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2009 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) ZOOTAXA 2321 Catalogue of family-group names in Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) YVES BOUSQUET1, DANIEL J. HEFFERN2, PATRICE BOUCHARD1 & EUGENIO H. NEARNS3 1Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Central Experimental Farm, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C6. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] 2 10531 Goldfield Lane, Houston, TX 77064, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 3 Department of Biology, Museum of Southwestern Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Corresponding author: [email protected] Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by Q. Wang: 2 Dec. 2009; published: 22 Dec. 2009 Yves Bousquet, Daniel J. Heffern, Patrice Bouchard & Eugenio H. Nearns CATALOGUE OF FAMILY-GROUP NAMES IN CERAMBYCIDAE (COLEOPTERA) (Zootaxa 2321) 80 pp.; 30 cm. 22 Dec. 2009 ISBN 978-1-86977-449-3 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-86977-450-9 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2009 BY Magnolia Press P.O. Box 41-383 Auckland 1346 New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ © 2009 Magnolia Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, transmitted or disseminated, in any form, or by any means, without prior written permission from the publisher, to whom all requests to reproduce copyright material should be directed in writing. This authorization does not extend to any other kind of copying, by any means, in any form, and for any purpose other than private research use.
    [Show full text]