DOCSLIB.ORG

Current Opinion in Psychology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Current Opinion in Psychology CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHOLOGY AUTHOR INFORMATION PACK TABLE OF CONTENTS XXX . • Description p.1 • Impact Factor p.2 • Abstracting and Indexing p.2 • Editorial Board p.2 • Guide for Authors p.4 ISSN: 2352-250X DESCRIPTION . Excellence paves the way With Current Opinion in Psychology The Current Opinion journals were developed out of the recognition that it is increasingly difficult for specialists to keep up to date with the expanding volume of information published in their subject. In Current Opinion in Psychology, we help the reader by providing in a systematic manner: The views of experts on current advances in psychology in a clear and readable form. Evaluations of the most interesting papers, annotated by experts, from the great wealth of original publications. The journal is part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite of journals and is a companion to the primary research, open access journal, Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology. CO+RE journals leverage the Current Opinion legacy of editorial excellence, high-impact, and global reach to ensure they are a widely-read resource that is integral to scientists' workflows. Division of the subject into sections Current Opinion in Psychology is divided into themed sections, some of which may be reviewed on an annual basis if appropriate. The amount of space devoted to each section is related to its importance. The topics covered will include: * Biological psychology * Clinical psychology * Cognitive psychology * Community psychology * Comparative psychology * Developmental psychology * Educational psychology * Environmental psychology * Evolutionary psychology * Health psychology * Neuropsychology * Personality psychology * Social psychology AUTHOR INFORMATION PACK 1 Oct 2021 www.elsevier.com/locate/copsyc 1 Selection of topics to be reviewed Section Editors, who are major authorities in the field, are appointed by the Editors of the journal. They divide their section into a number of topics, ensuring that the field is comprehensively covered and that all issues of current importance are emphasised. Section Editors commission reviews from authorities on each topic that they have selected. Reviews Authors write short review articles in which they present recent developments in their subject, emphasising the aspects that, in their opinion, are most important. In addition, they provide short annotations to the papers that they consider to be most interesting from all those published in their topic over the previous year. Review articles in Current Opinion in Psychology are by invitation only. Editorial Overview Section Editors write a short overview at the beginning of the section to introduce the reviews and to draw the reader's attention to any particularly interesting developments. Current Opinion in Psychology builds on Elsevier's reputation for excellence in scientific publishing and long-standing commitment to communicating reproducible biomedical research targeted at improving human health. It is a companion to the new Gold Open Access journal Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology and is part of the Current Opinion and Research(CO+RE) suite of journals. All CO+RE journals leverage the Current Opinion legacy-of editorial excellence, high-impact, and global reach-to ensure they are a widely read resource that is integral to scientists' workflow. Expertise - Editors and Editorial Board bring depth and breadth of expertise and experience to the journal. Discoverability - Articles get high visibility and maximum exposure on an industry-leading platform that reaches a vast global audience. Benefits to authors We also provide many author benefits, such as free PDFs, a liberal copyright policy, special discounts on Elsevier publications and much more. Please click here for more information on our author services. For more information, please refer to: https://www.elsevier.com/conflictsofinterestPlease contact us if you have ideas for the journal: [email protected] IMPACT FACTOR . 2020: 5.717 © Clarivate Analytics Journal Citation Reports 2021 ABSTRACTING AND INDEXING . PubMed/Medline Social Sciences Citation Index PsycINFO Google Scholar Scopus EDITORIAL BOARD . Editors-in-Chief Paul Van Lange, VU Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands AUTHOR INFORMATION PACK 1 Oct 2021 www.elsevier.com/locate/copsyc 2 Michael J. Zvolensky, University of Houston Department of Psychology, Houston, Texas, United States of America Editorial Board Jonathan S. Abramowitz, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America Gordon Asmundson, University of Regina Department of Psychology, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada Erin C. Berenz, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America Amit Bernstein, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel Herbert Bless, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany Robert Böhm, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany Julia D. Buckner, Louisiana State University Department of Psychology, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States of America Gian Vittoria Caprara, University of Rome La Sapienza, Roma, Italy Charles Carver, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, United States of America Joey Cheng, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Margaret Clark, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America Janine Clarke, Mend Psychology, Oatley, New South Wales, Australia Jan Copeland, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Katja Corcoran, University of Graz, Graz, Austria Eveline Crone, Leiden University Department of Psychologie, Leiden, Netherlands Stacey Daughters, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America Carsten de Dreu, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands Nadira Faber, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom Klaus Fiedler, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany Joe Forgas, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Adam Gonzalez, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America Stefan Hofmann, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America Emily A. Holmes, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden Gerben van Kleef, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands Gun Peggy Knudsen, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway Lydia Krabbendam, VU Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands Frank Krueger, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, United States of America Arie Kruglanski, University of Maryland at College Park, College Park, Maryland, United States of America Carl Lejuez, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States of America Michela Lenzi, University of Padua, Padova, Italy Adam M. Leventhal, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America Nira Liberman, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel Jeffrey Lohr, University of Arkansas Bookstore, Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States of America Lance McCracken, King's College London, London, United Kingdom Harald Merckelbach, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands Batja Mesquita, KU Leuven Center for Social and Cultural Psychology, Leuven, Belgium Mario Mikulincer, Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya, Herzliya, Israel Melissa Norberg, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Michael I. Norton, Harvard Business School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America Bunmi Olatunji, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America Miranda Olff, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands Daniel Paulus, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America Séamus Power, University of Copenhagen Department of Psychology, Copenhagen, Denmark Judith Prochaska, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America David G. Rand, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America Ronald M. Rapee, Macquarie University Department of Psychology, Sydney, Australia Craig Sawchuk, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America Norman B. Schmidt, Tallahassee, Florida, United States of America Carla Sharp, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, United States of America Jeffry A. Simpson, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America Jasper A. Smits, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America Matthew T Tull, The University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, United States of America Ayse K. Uskul, University of Kent, Canterbury, United Kingdom Kees Van den Bos, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands Michael Vasey, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America Anka Vujanovic, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, United States of America Denise D. Walker, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America Marieke Wichers, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands Junhui Wu, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China AUTHOR INFORMATION PACK 1 Oct 2021 www.elsevier.com/locate/copsyc 3 GUIDE FOR AUTHORS . Introduction The Current Opinion journals were developed out of the recognition that it is increasingly difficult for specialists to keep up to date with the expanding volume of information published in their subject. In the Current Opinion journals, we help the reader by providing in a systematic manner: (1) The views of experts on current
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Theory‐Practice Research of Peter J. Carnevale
    Negotiation and Conflict Management Research From the Field to the Laboratory: The Theory-Practice Research of Peter J. Carnevale Linda L. Putnam,1 Mara Olekalns ,2 Donald E. Conlon3 and Carsten K. W. De Dreu 4,5 1 University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, U.S.A. 2 Melbourne Business School, Melbourne, Vic., Australia 3 Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, U.S.A. 4 Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands 5 University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Keywords Abstract negotiation, emotion, third party, human–computer As colleagues and collaborators, we reflect on the work and legacy of interaction, methods. Peter Carnevale, currently professor at the University of Southern Cali- fornia, and recipient of the 2002 Jeffrey Z. Rubin Theory-to-Practice Correspondence Award of the International Association for Conflict Management Linda L. Putnam, Department of (IACM). We review Carnevale’s main contributions, including his work Communication, University of on time pressure and surveillance, strategies for mediation, emotions in California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA; negotiation, and the use and integration of distinct methods for studying e-mail: conflict and negotiation. We share personal anecdotes from our time as [email protected]. PhD students and collaborators with Peter Carnevale, and we touch on lessons learned for doing science and mentoring the next generation. doi: 10.1111/ncmr.12185 Introduction Trained in traditional experimental research, few scholars have crossed the theory/practice divide with such a strong focus on conceptual development. Whether relying on gaps in experimental research, insights from real-world mediations, or theory development that challenges existing knowledge, Peter J.
    [Show full text]
  • Methods of Negotiation Research: Introduction
    INER 9.3_f2_340-344 3/8/05 7:58 PM Page 341 International Negotiation 9: 341–344, 2004. 341 © 2004 Koninklijke Brill NV. Printed in the Netherlands. Methods of Negotiation Research: Introduction PETER J. CARNEVALE* Department of Psychology, New York University, 6 Washington Place, Room 577, New York, NY 10003 USA E-mail: [email protected] CARSTEN K.W. DE DREU** Organizational Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Roetersstraat 15, 1018 WB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands E-mail [email protected] Main Entry: method Function: noun 1: a way, plan, or procedure for doing something 2: orderly arrangement from The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition A close look at the many methodological practices in the study of negotiation reveals a simple fact: there is no one best way, no one best plan, no single orderly arrangement that best produces understanding about negotiation. Indeed, the cornucopia of methods is impressive – as is the strength of the field. There are historical case studies, laboratory experiments, survey studies, archival data analysis, mathematical modeling – the diversity of method is * Peter Carnevale is professor of social and organizational psychology at New York University, moving to NYU in 2001 after many years at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign. He is a past president of the International Association for Conflict Management and past Chair of the Conflict Management Division of the Academy of Management. His research program incorporates multiple methods and techniques – laboratory experiments, surveys of professionals, interviews, archival data analysis, multidimensional scaling, etc., to understand the interplay of cognitive, affective, and motivational processes in negotiation and mediation.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting the Form and Function of Conflict: Neurobiological
    Behavioral and Brain Sciences Revisiting the form and function of conflict: Neurobiological, psychological, and cultural cambridge.org/bbs mechanisms for attack and defense within and between groups Target Article Cite this article: De Dreu CKW, Gross J. (2019) Carsten K. W. De Dreu and Jörg Gross Revisiting the form and function of conflict: Neurobiological, psychological, and cultural Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, 2300 RB Leiden, The Netherlands Center for Research in Experimental mechanisms for attack and defense within and Economics and Political Decision Making (CREED), University of Amsterdam, 1018 WB Amsterdam, The between groups. Behavioral and Brain Sciences Netherlands and Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, 2300 RB Leiden, The Netherlands 42, e116: 1–66. doi:10.1017/ [email protected] https://www.universiteitleiden.nl/en/staffmembers/carsten-de-dreu S0140525X18002170 [email protected] http://www.joerg-gross.net Target Article Accepted: 13 September 2018 Target Article Manuscript Online: 25 Abstract September 2018 Conflict can profoundly affect individuals and their groups. Oftentimes, conflict involves a Commentaries Accepted: 11 February 2019 clash between one side seeking change and increased gains through victory and the other Keywords: side defending the status quo and protecting against loss and defeat. However, theory and behavioral game theory; biobehavioral empirical research largely neglected these conflicts between attackers and defenders, and the – approach avoidance; coevolution of strategic, social, and psychological consequences of attack and defense remain poorly under- prosociality and aggression; conflict; conflict intervention; cultural institutions; intergroup stood. To fill this void, we model (1) the clashing of attack and defense as games of strategy relations; psychological adaptations and reveal that (2) attack benefits from mismatching its target’s level of defense, whereas defense benefits from matching the attacker’s competitiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict Cultures in Organizations: How Leaders Shape Conflict Cultures and Their Organizational-Level Consequences
    Journal of Applied Psychology © 2012 American Psychological Association 2012, Vol. 97, No. 6, 1131–1147 0021-9010/12/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/a0029993 Conflict Cultures in Organizations: How Leaders Shape Conflict Cultures and Their Organizational-Level Consequences Michele J. Gelfand Lisa M. Leslie University of Maryland University of Minnesota Kirsten Keller Carsten de Dreu Rand Corporation University of Amsterdam Anecdotal evidence abounds that organizations have distinct conflict cultures, or socially shared norms for how conflict should be managed. However, research to date has largely focused on conflict management styles at the individual and small group level, and has yet to examine whether organizations create socially shared and normative ways to manage conflict. In a sample of leaders and members from 92 branches of a large bank, factor analysis and aggregation analyses show that 3 conflict cultures— collaborative, dominating, and avoidant—operate at the unit level of analysis. Building on Lewin, Lippitt, and White’s (1939) classic work, we find that leaders’ own conflict management behaviors are associated with distinct unit conflict cultures. The results also demonstrate that conflict cultures have implications for macro branch-level outcomes, including branch viability (i.e., cohesion, potency, and burnout) and branch performance (i.e., creativity and customer service). A conflict culture perspective moves beyond the individual level and provides new insight into the dynamics of conflict management in organizational contexts. Keywords: culture, conflict management, norms, leadership, organizations Why do some organizations develop cultures in which conflict headlined as having “a staff consumed with infighting over how to is managed productively, whereas others have cultures in which sell their candidate” (Sheehy, 2008, p.
    [Show full text]
  • 2002. Signal, 17(2)
    Spring/Summer 2002 Volume 1117, No. 2 ISSN #1048-6048-6048-615111 IACM Officers and Board IAIAIACM 2002 Promises IntIntIntellectualellectualellectual MemberMemberMemberss (200(200(2001-2002)1-2002)1-2002) SSS timulation in a Buccolic Envirvirvironmentonmentonment Carsten De Dreu, University of Amsterdam, President by Cathy Tinsley, IACM 2002 Program Chair [email protected] The IACM 2002 conference promises to deliver an outstanding array of Bruce Barry, Vanderbilt University, papers, symposia, workshops, and posters, in one of the most President-Elect breathtakingly beautiful areas of the United States. This year we [email protected] received a number of submissions from both regular members as well as several new or recently joined members. We have a diversity of Donald Conlon, Michigan State Univeristy, topics and perspectives, which will create a wonderfully energetic and Past-President stimulating set of meetings. In total, we received 62 papers, 15 [email protected] extended abstracts, and 15 symposia, and two workshop proposals. Many thanks to all who submitted as well as to all those who reviewed! Judy McLean Parks, Washington Univeristy, The conference will begin on Sunday evening, June 9, with an Executive Director opening dinner, followed by a showcase poster session from 8:30- [email protected] 10:00 p.m. We have an excellent set of posters representing diverse topics such as natural resources conflict (appropriate for our setting!), Cathy Tinsley, Georgetown University, negotiation tactics, terrorism, use of multi-media tools, meditation and 2002 Program Chair the education of peace, peacekeeping, cross-cultural negotiation, and [email protected] the influence of relationships and interpersonal conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    Peter J. Carnevale Department of Management and Organization, Marshall School of Business University of Southern California, 3670 Trousdale Parkway Los Angeles, CA 90089-0808 USA E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.marshall.usc.edu/MOR Education Ph.D. 1982 Social and Organizational Psychology, State University of New York at Buffalo. Minors: Statistics and Measurement B.A. 1977 Psychology, University of Delaware Employment/Research Experience Professor, Department of Management & Organization, Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California, January 2007 – present (affiliated appointment in the Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism) Director of Research Initiatives, Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California, September 2014 – 2016 Professor, Department of Psychology, New York University, September 2001 – January 2007 (affiliated appointment in the Leonard N. Stern School of Business) Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1985- 2001; Assistant Professor (1985), Associate Professor with tenure (1991), Full Professor (1997) (affiliated appointment in the Institute of Labor and Industrial Relations) Division Head, Division of Social and Organizational Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1995-1999, elected annually Visiting Professor: INSEAD Business School, Fontainebleau, France, 2012; Dept. of Management, Univ. of Western Australia, 2012; Dept. of Psychology, Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2000; Dept. of Psychology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 1999 Assistant Professor, College of Business Administration, University of Iowa, 1982-1985 - 1 - Research and Scholarship Books Carnevale, P.J., & De Dreu, C.K.W. (Eds.) (2006). Methods of negotiation research. Leiden, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. [http://www.brill.nl/ines] [Winner of the 2008 International Association for Conflict Management Award for Most Outstanding Book Published in the years 2006 and 2007] Pruitt, D.G., & Carnevale, P.J.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008. Signal, 24(1)
    SIGNAL FALL/WINTER 2008 Volume 24, Issue 1, Page ELECTRONIC ̶ NEWSLETTER Fall/Winter 2008 Volume 24, Issue 1 ISSN # 1048-6151 A Report on the IACM in Chicago: Conference Lights, Camera, Conference 2008 Program is on page 4. !!! PRESIDENT’S CORNER 2008 IACM Conference By Mara Olekalns, University of Melbourne, [email protected] Jeanne Brett and Nancy McLaughlin, Northwestern University, USA, [email protected] n This year marks a decade since I joined IACM. Thanks to Peter [email protected] Carnevale, I discovered IACM in 1996 when I spent my first sabbatical at the University of Illinois in Urbana-Champaign. The 21st Annual International Association for Conflict During my visit, Peter enthused about IACM and encouraged me Management Conference was held in the heart of to attend the next conference in Bonn. I did and it’s been my downtown Chicago at Marriott’s Renaissance Chicago “home” ever since. Little did I think that, 10 years later, the care th of this vibrant organization would be entrusted to me. Thank Hotel July 3 – 6, 2008 over the 4 of July. 200 people you. attended the conference. Two highlights of the conference were No President acts alone. Our Board is dedicated, enthusiastic and inspirational to work with. Without the hard work and • The keynote address by Thomas Schelling the 2007 commitment of our board members, IACM would be a very IACM Lifetime Achievement Awardee and different organization. IACM thrives and develops because of • Linda Babcock’s speech accepting the 2008 IACM their willingness to contribute the most precious resource of all, Rubin Theory to Practice award for her work on their time.
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict Cultures in Organizations: How Leaders Shape Conflict Cultures and Their Organizational-Level Consequences
    Journal of Applied Psychology © 2012 American Psychological Association 2012, Vol. 97, No. 6, 1131–1147 0021-9010/12/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/a0029993 Conflict Cultures in Organizations: How Leaders Shape Conflict Cultures and Their Organizational-Level Consequences Michele J. Gelfand Lisa M. Leslie University of Maryland University of Minnesota Kirsten Keller Carsten de Dreu Rand Corporation University of Amsterdam Anecdotal evidence abounds that organizations have distinct conflict cultures, or socially shared norms broadly. for how conflict should be managed. However, research to date has largely focused on conflict management styles at the individual and small group level, and has yet to examine whether organizations publishers. create socially shared and normative ways to manage conflict. In a sample of leaders and members from 92 branches of a large bank, factor analysis and aggregation analyses show that 3 conflict cultures— allied collaborative, dominating, and avoidant—operate at the unit level of analysis. Building on Lewin, disseminated its Lippitt, and White’s (1939) classic work, we find that leaders’ own conflict management behaviors are be of to associated with distinct unit conflict cultures. The results also demonstrate that conflict cultures have one implications for macro branch-level outcomes, including branch viability (i.e., cohesion, potency, and not or is burnout) and branch performance (i.e., creativity and customer service). A conflict culture perspective moves beyond the individual level and provides new insight into the dynamics of conflict management and in organizational contexts. user Association Keywords: culture, conflict management, norms, leadership, organizations individual the Why do some organizations develop cultures in which conflict headlined as having “a staff consumed with infighting over how to Psychological of is managed productively, whereas others have cultures in which sell their candidate” (Sheehy, 2008, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting the Form and Function of Conflict
    Behavioral and Brain Sciences Revisiting the form and function of conflict: Neurobiological, psychological, and cultural cambridge.org/bbs mechanisms for attack and defense within and between groups Target Article Cite this article: De Dreu CKW, Gross J. (2019) Carsten K. W. De Dreu and Jörg Gross Revisiting the form and function of conflict: Neurobiological, psychological, and cultural Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, 2300 RB Leiden, The Netherlands Center for Research in Experimental mechanisms for attack and defense within and Economics and Political Decision Making (CREED), University of Amsterdam, 1018 WB Amsterdam, The between groups. Behavioral and Brain Sciences Netherlands and Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, 2300 RB Leiden, The Netherlands 42, e116: 1–66. doi:10.1017/ [email protected] https://www.universiteitleiden.nl/en/staffmembers/carsten-de-dreu S0140525X18002170 [email protected] http://www.joerg-gross.net Target Article Accepted: 13 September 2018 Target Article Manuscript Online: 25 Abstract September 2018 Conflict can profoundly affect individuals and their groups. Oftentimes, conflict involves a Commentaries Accepted: 11 February 2019 clash between one side seeking change and increased gains through victory and the other Keywords: side defending the status quo and protecting against loss and defeat. However, theory and behavioral game theory; biobehavioral empirical research largely neglected these conflicts between attackers and defenders, and the – approach avoidance; coevolution of strategic, social, and psychological consequences of attack and defense remain poorly under- prosociality and aggression; conflict; conflict intervention; cultural institutions; intergroup stood. To fill this void, we model (1) the clashing of attack and defense as games of strategy relations; psychological adaptations and reveal that (2) attack benefits from mismatching its target’s level of defense, whereas defense benefits from matching the attacker’s competitiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • THE LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY an International Journal of Political, Social and Behavioral Science
    THE LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY An International Journal of Political, Social and Behavioral Science AUTHOR INFORMATION PACK TABLE OF CONTENTS XXX . • Description p.1 • Impact Factor p.1 • Abstracting and Indexing p.1 • Editorial Board p.1 • Guide for Authors p.6 ISSN: 1048-9843 DESCRIPTION . The Leadership Quarterly is a social-science journal dedicated to advancing our understanding of leadership as a phenomenon, how to study it, as well as its practical implications. The journal seeks contributions from various disciplinary perspectives, including psychology broadly defined (i.e., industrial-organizational, social, evolutionary, biological, differential), management (i.e., organizational behavior, strategy, organizational theory), political science, sociology, economics (i.e., personnel, behavioral, labor), anthropology, history, and methodology. Equally desirable are contributions from multidisciplinary perspectives. The aim of the journal is to publish scholarly research, theory, and developmental application from diverse fields of inquiry about leadership. The journal will consider studies of leaders from all walks of social life, including formal or informal leaders of any type of group or organization; non-human leadership will also be considered. IMPACT FACTOR . 2020: 10.517 © Clarivate Analytics Journal Citation Reports 2021 ABSTRACTING AND INDEXING . Scopus Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences PsycINFO PsycINFO Sociological Abstracts Social Sciences Citation Index EDITORIAL BOARD . Editor in Chief John Antonakis, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland AUTHOR INFORMATION PACK 24 Sep 2021 www.elsevier.com/locate/leaqua 1 Yearly Review Editor Kevin B. Lowe, The University of Sydney Business School, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Senior Associate Editors George C. Banks, UNC Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina, United States of America Michael S. Cole, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, Texas, United States of America Olga Epitropaki, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom Seth M.
    [Show full text]
  • 2001. Signal, 16(1)
    SIGNAL Fall/Winter 2001, Volume 17, No. 1 IACM Officers and Board IACM President Responds to September 11th Members (2001-2002) Attacks on the US, by Carsten K.W. De Dreu, IACM President Carsten De Dreu, University of A few days before the US launched its missiles, a reporter from Brazil Amsterdam, President interviewed me in my capacity as IACM President about the terrorist attacks [email protected] on September 11th. We talked about possible responses, about the concept of Bruce Barry, Vanderbilt University, justice and freedom, and about the meaning of war and peace. Should the US President-Elect government respond in kind, with violence, or should it respond in line with its [email protected] own principle, that of bringing criminals to court and judging them on the basis of factual evidence? Has the meaning of freedom and of peace changed in the Donald Conlon, Michigan State University, Past-President past few weeks, and will this change be temporary or permanent? Can this [email protected] particular and extremely violent attack trigger new conflict, even in places where we do not expect it to erupt? Is revenge to be rejected under all Judy McLean Parks, Washington conditions, or can it sometimes be an acceptable, even commendable University, Executive Director reaction? [email protected] Among these interesting and important questions was a question about Cathy Tinsley, Georgetown what the International Association for Conflict Management had to say about University, 2002 Program these events. I started by explaining that we are a virtual organization without Coordinator offices and headquarters, that we have a newsletter and an annual conference, [email protected] but that it isn’t our goal to comment on these events, let alone provide advice.
    [Show full text]
  • 2002. Signal, 17(1)
    International Association for Conflict SIGNAL Management Fall/Winter 2002 Volume 18, No. 1 ISSN #1048-6151 IACM 2002 -2003 Board Members President's Corner Bruce Barry, Vanderbilt University by Bruce Barry, Vanderbilt University, IACM President President [email protected] As I write this, war looms in the Middle East, terrorism has Laurie Weingart, Carnegie Mellon University reared its ugly head in Asia, a mooncalf with a high powered rifle is President-Elect scaring the pants off the entire Washington DC region, and the world [email protected] at large seems like an increasingly dangerous place (as if such a thing is possible). This makes serving a term as president of an Carsten de Dreu, University of Amsterdam organization devoted to conflict management seem a bit like whistling Past-President [email protected] in the dark. Never has this field of ours been more patently important, but also more challenged to make our research, teaching, William Donohue, Michigan State University and practice relevant and impactful. I am honored to be president, Board Member but skeptical that I can do justice to a leadership role in an [email protected] organization with the phrase “conflict management” in its name. High-mindedness aside, in this article I want to reflect a bit on recent Alain Lempereur, ESSEC Business School Board Member IACM events and point to exciting things happening as we as an [email protected] association look ahead to the coming year. Mara Olekalns, University of Melbourne Looking Back: The Utah Conference Board Member, 2003 Local Arrangements Chair, For starters, to echo what was done more formally at the [email protected] conference in Utah last June, let me extend hearty thanks to my Robin Pinkley, Southern Methodist University predecessor, the estimable Carsten de Dreu of the University of Board Member Amsterdam, for his service as President in 2001-2002.
    [Show full text]