Private Equity Deskbook Mid-Year Update 2008

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Private Equity Deskbook Mid-Year Update 2008 Private Equity Deskbook Mid-Year Update 2008 2008 © Probitas Partners Contents Introduction ......................................................................... 1 The Perfect Storm: The Credit Cycle & Private Equity .................................................................... 2 The Market for Buying Companies .................................. 2 Defaults & Bankruptcies ..................................................... 4 Fundraising & Distressed Investing ............................... 9 “The Best & the Brightest” .............................................. 11 The Venture Capital Market: No Exit .......................... 13 The Secondary Market ..................................................... 14 Conclusion ........................................................................... 18 Funds in or Coming to Market ....................................... 20 Introduction Probitas Partners is a leading independent knowledge, innovation and solutions provider to private markets clients. It has three integrated global practices that include placement of alternative investment products, portfolio management and liquidity management. These services are offered by a team of employee owners dedicated to leveraging the firm’s vast knowledge and technical resources to provide the best results for its clients. probity ¯¯˘ n. [from Latin probitas: good, proper, honest.] adherence to the highest principles, ideals and character. On an ongoing basis, Probitas Partners offers research and investment tools on the alternative investment market as aids to its institutional investor and general partner clients. Probitas Partners compiles data from various trade and other sources and then vets and enhances that data via its team’s broad knowledge of the market. Accurate data is elusive in private markets. Probitas Partners shares this data in an effort to improve professionalism, consistently raise the bar on professional services, and assist all participants in their investment, portfolio management and fund raising endeavors. Included within this 2008 Private Equity Mid-Year Update is our listing of Funds In or Thought to Be Coming to Market Over the Next 12 Months. A few important user notes on the listing: • The list does not track funds smaller than $100 million or €70 million, as these are not often targeted by institutional investors; • Information is collected from various data sources, but dynamically and accurately tracking when funds are launched and when they are finally closed is a difficult business. We constantly interact with investors and other industry sources in an effort to keep the data updated, and Probitas Partners appreciates receiving any corrections or updates which will help keep this listing as up to date as possible; and • Information on private equity real estate and infrastructure funds is captured separately in our Real Estate & Hard Asset Mid-Year Update. Probitas Partners relies upon its knowledge of the investment pace of previous funds, informal discussions with institutional investors and general partners, and its knowledge of emerging managers. Specifically, we do not seek confirmation of these estimates with general partners in order to avoid SEC public offering prohibitions. For the same reason, Probitas Partners does not include in this listing information on funds it is currently offering. Qualified investors seeking information on Probitas Partners’ placed funds should contact Probitas Partners directly in order to have the most complete picture of all institutional funds currently in the market. 1 Confidential & Trade Secret ©2008 Do not circulate or publish. The Perfect Storm: The Credit moderate. As sellers’ expectations gradually Cycle & Private Equity adjust and debt availability returns to the market, experienced buyout professionals The problems in the capital markets and (and limited partners) are expecting private equity investing that became evident Vintage 2008 and 2009 funds to capitalize in the summer of 2007 began to swell into a on increased opportunities to buy companies perfect storm during the first half of 2008. at reduced prices. Concerns regarding the availability of cheap debt to fund buyouts in the private equity industry remain, but such concerns have been overtaken by worries about the credit The Market for Buying quality of existing portfolio companies. The Companies combination of high levels of leverage and an impending recession in North America The dwindling availability of debt to support is creating a building wave of corporate acquisitions, the increasing threat of defaults, many of which are portfolio recession in the U.S. and the resulting turmoil companies of buyout funds. in the public equity markets has dramatically impacted global mergers and acquisitions Though the performance outlook for Vintage activity. As noted in Table I, newly-announced 2005 and 2006 buyout funds is bleak, transactions fell by over 35% worldwide especially for the larger funds that were most during the first half of 2008. In particular, aggressive with leverage, the current market the developed markets of North America, turmoil is shaping a more positive base Western Europe and Japan have been much and performance dynamic for the future. more heavily impacted than other markets to For example, the high price expectations date, with each registering declines of roughly (set when the market peaked) of those 45%. Activity in the emerging markets, which looking to sell companies are beginning to are less dependent on debt and are supported Table I Announced Mergers & Acquisitions by Region, First Half of 2008 Region Value, Millions of Number of Deals Value Change U.S. Dollars from 2007 Worldwide 1,566,774.5 18,488 -35.7% North America 624,450.5 5,672 -45.0% Western Europe 452,013.7 4,778 -46.8% Japan 37,924.4 1,254 -44.2% Asia-Pacific 260,710.5 4,722 23.6% Brazil 47,441.1 308 138.4% Eastern Europe 82,722.3 927 -2.5% Source: Thomson Reuters Confidential & Trade Secret ©2008 Do not circulate or publish. 2 by still-growing economies, has increased in was the purchase of the concession for the a number of instances, though based off of Pennsylvania Turnpike, an infrastructure a much smaller base than in the developed transaction. markets. China, Brazil and India, in particular, still show robust domestic growth and strong For those buyout transactions that have M&A activity, though their publicly-traded been completed, the amount of leverage securities markets have become volatile. used to purchase individual companies has dropped substantially. As detailed in The decline in activity within the North Chart I, after increasing every year since American leveraged buyout market has been 2002, the average debt multiple of large even more dramatic. First-half 2008 activity corporate LBO loans dropped from 6.9x for for North American buyout firms was only 2007 (when the market peaked), to 4.9x for $26 billion, a 92% decline from the first half the first half of 2008. of 2007. On a percentage basis, during the second quarter of 2008 leveraged buyouts The average debt multiple for current accounted for only 3% of M&A activity in investments in large buyout fund portfolios North America, plummeting from an all- may actually be overstated. During the first time high of over 30% in the second quarter half of 2008, a number of large buyout of 2007. funds began to pursue minority investments into large companies on a pure equity basis On a global basis, activity at the largest with no leverage at all. Certain institutional end of the market, the domain of Mega investors have expressed concern about Buyout funds, was hit particularly hard. Of what they perceive to be strategy drift in the 15 largest announced M&A transactions these investments; how such investments will in 2008, only a single transaction involved eventually perform is still very much up in private equity investors — and that transaction the air. Chart I Average Debt Multiples of Large Corporate LBO Loans (i.e., Issuers with EBITDA > $50mm) 8 6.9 7 6.2 5.7 6 5.4 5.3 5.4 4.7 4.8 4.9 5 4.6 4.2 4.1 4.0 4 3 2 1 Debt to Equity Multiple at Purchase Equity Debt to 0 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 As of June 30, Source: Standard & Poor’s LCD 2008 3 Confidential & Trade Secret ©2008 Do not circulate or publish. Defaults & Bankruptcies worse and whose outlook is negative, or are on CreditWatch with negative implications. As 2008 has progressed, predictions of Its latest list includes 130 companies, 46 of defaults on high-yield bonds and loans have which are companies sponsored by private increased. Standard & Poors reported 28 equity firms. The list of the ten largest defaults on rated debt as of May, compared portfolio companies of private equity funds to 22 for all of 2007. They predict that by on the latest “Weakest Links” list comprises early 2009 defaults will increase to 4.7% Table II. (Of note, Linens ‘n Things, an Apollo of outstanding high-yield debt (from .97% portfolio company that was on the March list, in December 2007). Furthermore, Moody’s has since filed for a Chapter 11 bankruptcy.) now predicts defaults rising to 6.1% over the same period. The “Weakest Links” list highlights another symptom of the current cycle — the These general forecasts are distinctly fact that problem credits to date have illustrated in the distress of the current been concentrated in North America. private equity market. On a regular basis, All of the firms on the list in Table II, and 44 Standard & Poors produces
Recommended publications
  • The Granular Nature of Large Institutional Investors
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES THE GRANULAR NATURE OF LARGE INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS Itzhak Ben-David Francesco Franzoni Rabih Moussawi John Sedunov Working Paper 22247 http://www.nber.org/papers/w22247 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 May 2016, Revised July 2020 Special acknowledgments go to Robin Greenwood and David Thesmar for thoughtful and extensive comments. We also thank Sergey Chernenko, Kent Daniel (NBER discussant), Itamar Drechsler, Thierry Foucault, Xavier Gabaix, Denis Gromb, Andrew Karolyi, Alberto Plazzi, Tarun Ramadorai (AFA discussant), Martin Schmalz, René Stulz, and Fabio Trojani as well as participants at the NBER Summer Institute (Risk of Financial Institutions) and seminars at Cornell University, the Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya, University of Texas at Austin, Georgia State University, Tilburg University, Maastricht University, HEC Paris, USI Lugano, Villanova University, The Ohio State University, the Bank for International Settlements, NBER Risk of Financial Institutions Summer Institute, and American Finance Association for helpful comments. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2016 by Itzhak Ben-David, Francesco Franzoni, Rabih Moussawi, and John Sedunov. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. The Granular Nature of Large Institutional Investors Itzhak Ben-David, Francesco Franzoni, Rabih Moussawi, and John Sedunov NBER Working Paper No.
    [Show full text]
  • Combining Banking with Private Equity Investing*
    Unstable Equity? * Combining Banking with Private Equity Investing First draft: April 14, 2010 This draft: July 30, 2010 Lily Fang INSEAD Victoria Ivashina Harvard University and NBER Josh Lerner Harvard University and NBER Theoretical work suggests that banks can be driven by market mispricing to undertake activity in a highly cyclical manner, accelerating activity during periods when securities can be readily sold to other parties. While financial economists have largely focused on bank lending, banks are active in a variety of arenas, with proprietary trading and investing being particularly controversial. We focus on the role of banks in the private equity market. We show that bank- affiliated private equity groups accounted for a significant share of the private equity activity and the bank’s own capital. We find that banks’ share of activity increases sharply during peaks of the private equity cycles. Deals done by bank-affiliated groups are financed at significantly better terms than other deals when the parent bank is part of the lending syndicate, especially during market peaks. While bank-affiliated investments generally involve targets with better ex-ante characteristics, bank-affiliated investments have slightly worse outcomes than non-affiliated investments. Also consistent with theory, the cyclicality of banks’ engagement in private equity and favorable financing terms are negatively correlated with the amount of capital that banks commit to funding of any particular transaction. * An earlier version of this manuscript was circulated under the title “An Unfair Advantage? Combining Banking with Private Equity Investing.” We thank Anna Kovner, Anthony Saunders, Antoinette Schoar, Morten Sorensen, Per Strömberg, Greg Udell and seminar audiences at Boston University, INSEAD, Maastricht University, Tilburg University, University of Mannheim and Wharton for helpful comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Institutional Investor Study 2019
    Institutional Investor Study 2019 Geopolitics and investor expectations Marketing material for professional investors and advisers only Schroders Institutional Investor Study 2019 | Geopolitics and investor expectations 01 Contents 02 Executive summary 10 Investment goals • Generating income comes out on top 03 Portfolio performance Increasing allocations to fixed income • Geopolitical concerns dominate the investment landscape 12 Growing appetite for innovation • The quest for new, customised solutions 05 Return expectations • De-risking through LDI • Optimistic return expectations despite an uncertain landscape 14 Risk management strategies • The dominance of diversification 08 Staying strategic • Strategic asset allocation 16 About the Study driving decision making • Focus on long-term holding periods Schroders Institutional Investor Study 2019 | Geopolitics and investor expectations 02 Executive summary Geopolitical turbulence and the threat of a However, the most important investment Schroders’ third annual global economic slowdown are seen as the objective for investors for the next most important influences on a portfolio’s 12 months is meeting income and yield investment performance for the next 12 requirements (66%). Capital preservation Institutional Investor Study months. Since our inaugural Study in 2017, and generating high risk-adjusted returns we have seen investors become more rank second and third, illustrating how This Study analyses the investment perspectives of 650 institutional concerned about how world events are institutions are looking to more defensive investors, collectively responsible for $25.4 trillion in assets and from affecting growth (32% in 2017 vs. 52% in 2019). assets to de-risk portfolios during heightened 20 locations across the world. The Study provides a snapshot of some This is also evidenced by a steady decline in geopolitical uncertainty.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Equity Spotlight January 2007 / Volume 3 - Issue 1
    Private Equity Spotlight January 2007 / Volume 3 - Issue 1 Welcome to the latest edition of Private Equity Spotlight, the monthly newsletter from Private Equity Intelligence, providing insights into private equity performance, investors and fundraising. Private Equity Spotlight combines information from our online products Performance Analyst, Investor Intelligence and Funds in Market. FEATURE ARTICLE page 01 INVESTOR SPOTLIGHT page 10 Overhang, what overhang? The favourable market and difficulty of getting allocations to With 2006’s $404 billion smashing all previous records for top quartile funds has led to increased LP interest in Asian private equity fund raising, some commentators are suggesting focused funds. We look at LPs investing in these funds. that there is now an ‘overhang’ of committed capital that the industry may struggle to invest. The facts suggest otherwise. • How do LPs perceive Asian focused funds? PERFORMANCE SPOTLIGHT page 05 • Who is making the most Growth in distributions to LPs and the rate of call-ups are significant investments? driving the fundraising market. Performance Spotlight looks at the trends. • Which types of investor are the most active? FUND RAISING page 06 After a record breaking year for fundraising in 2006, we • How much is being committed examine the latest news for venture and buyout funds, as well to the region? as examining the market for first-time fund vehicles. No. of Funds on INVESTOR NEWS page 12 US Europe ROW Road All the latest news on investors in private equity: Venture 202 97 83 382 • State of Wisconsin Investment Board posts high returns Buyout 100 48 36 184 boosted by its private equity portfolio Funds of Funds 65 47 12 124 • Somerset County Council Pension Fund seeks new fund of Other 129 31 42 202 funds manager • LACERA looks for new advisor Total 496 223 173 892 • Indiana PERF is set to issue real estate RFPs SUBSCRIPTIONS If you would like to receive Private Equity Spotlight each month • COPERA close to appointing new alternatives chief.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Equity 05.23.12
    This document is being provided for the exclusive use of SABRINA WILLMER at BLOOMBERG/ NEWSROOM: NEW YORK 05.23.12 Private Equity www.bloombergbriefs.com BRIEF NEWS, ANALYSIS AND COMMENTARY CVC Joins Firms Seeking Boom-Era Size Funds QUOTE OF THE WEEK BY SABRINA WILLMER CVC Capital Partners Ltd. hopes its next European buyout fund will nearly match its predecessor, a 10.75 billion euro ($13.6 billion) fund that closed in 2009, according to two “I think it would be helpful people familiar with the situation. That will make it one of the largest private equity funds if Putin stopped wandering currently seeking capital. One person said that CVC European Equity Partners VI LP will likely aim to raise 10 around bare-chested.” billion euros. The firm hasn’t yet sent out marketing materials. Two people said they expect it to do so — Janusz Heath, managing director of in the second half. Mary Zimmerman, an outside spokeswoman for CVC Capital, declined Capital Dynamics, speaking at the EMPEA to comment. conference on how Russia might help its reputation and attract more private equity The London-based firm would join only a few other firms that have closed or are try- investment. See page 4 ing to raise new funds of similar size to the mega funds raised during the buyout boom. Leonard Green & Partners’s sixth fund is expected to close shortly on more than $6 billion, more than the $5.3 billion its last fund closed on in 2007. Advent International MEETING TO WATCH Corp. is targeting 7 billion euros for its seventh fund, larger than its last fund, and War- burg Pincus LLC has a $12 billion target on Warburg Pincus Private Equity XI LP, the NEW JERSEY STATE INVESTMENT same goal as its predecessor.
    [Show full text]
  • Q2 2013 Preqin Private Equity Benchmarks: All Private Equity Benchmark Report
    Preqin Private Equity Benchmarks: All Private Equity Benchmark Report As of 30th June 2013 alternative assets. intelligent data. Preqin Private Equity Benchmarks: All Private Equity Benchmark Report As of 30th June 2013 Report Produced on 12th March 2014 This publication is not included in the CLA Licence so you must not copy any portion of it without the permission of the publisher. All rights reserved. The entire contents of the report are the Copyright of Preqin Ltd. No part of this publication or any information contained in it may be copied, transmitted by any electronic means, or stored in any electronic or other data storage medium, or printed or published in any document, report or publication, without the express prior written approval of Preqin Ltd. The information presented in the report is for information purposes only and does not constitute and should not be construed as a solicitation or other offer, or recommendation to acquire or dispose of any investment or to engage in any other transaction, or as advice of any nature whatsoever. If the reader seeks advice rather than information then he should seek an independent fi nancial advisor and hereby agrees that he will not hold Preqin Ltd. responsible in law or equity for any decisions of whatever nature the reader makes or refrains from making following its use of the report. While reasonable efforts have been used to obtain information from sources that are believed to be accurate, and to confi rm the accuracy of such information wherever possible, Preqin Ltd. Does not make any representation or warranty that the information or opinions contained in the report are accurate, reliable, up-to-date or complete.
    [Show full text]
  • LAZARD GROUP LLC (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark One) ☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 OR ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to 333-126751 (Commission File Number) LAZARD GROUP LLC (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 51-0278097 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) or Organization) 30 Rockefeller Plaza New York, NY 10020 (Address of principal executive offices) Registrant’s telephone number: (212) 632-6000 Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☒ No ☐ Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒ Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐ Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Investment News November 10, 2008
    ain111008 6/11/08 19:18 Page 1 NOVEMBER 1O, 2008 LEHMAN/NOMURA PRIME BROKER VOL. IX, NO. 45 INTEGRATION HITS SYSTEMS SNAG Credit Suisse Cuts Combining the prime brokerage businesses of Nomura FoF Headcount Holdings and Lehman Brothers has reportedly hit a costly and The firm has trimmed 10 staffers from its fund of funds unit, with most of the unexpected snag that could delay full integration for an culled positions based in Europe. undetermined time, potentially stretching to several months or See story, page 9 over a year. An official involved with the merger integration plans told AIN that in Nomura’s acquisition of Lehman’s Asia, India and At Press Time European operations, it received the software for Lehman’s cash Zaragoza Likes Biotechs 2 prime brokerage system—which includes trading, analytics and (continued on page 19) The Americas Nonprofits To Add HFs 4 MELLON SUSPENDS SANCTUARY FUNDS Peloton Pro Sets Up Shop 4 Mellon Global Alternative Investments has suspended dealings on the $344 million Mellon RCG Bullish On Asia 6 Sanctuary Fund and the $426 million Mellon Sanctuary Fund II—its flagship event-driven Startup Readies Managed Account 7 and relative-value funds of hedge funds—as liquidity concerns have arisen from Europe unprecedented volatility in the markets. A number of the underlying funds “have invoked German Shop Revisits Launches 9 provisions that are intended for periods such as this where acute market illiquidity is coupled Pioneer Keen On Green 10 with extreme selling pressure,” stated an email sent to AIN by Spokesman Jamie Brookes. Mulvaney Sees Record Highs 11 (continued on page 20) Asia Pacific EX-FSA EXEC: SMALLER FUNDS NEED Infrastructure Firm Hires Trio 12 CLOSER SUPERVISION Japan Launch Pushed Back 13 The U.K.’s Financial Services Authority should monitor the behaviour of smaller hedge Middle East & Africa fund firms more closely because malpractice is more likely to go unnoticed in these firms.
    [Show full text]
  • 4Q20 Performance Report by Investment.Xlk
    Statement of Investments (1) As of December 31, 2020 Total Investment Name Investment Strategy Vintage Committed Paid-In Capital (2) Valuation Net IRR Distributions ABRY Partners VII, L.P. Corporate Finance/Buyout 2011$ 3,500,000 $ 3,744,449 $ 1,101,274 ABRY Senior Equity III, L.P. Mezzanine 2010 5,000,000 4,636,391 117,107 ABRY Senior Equity IV, L.P. Mezzanine 2012 6,503,582 6,623,796 2,166,407 ABS Capital Partners VI, L.P. Growth Equity 2009 4,000,000 3,928,337 45,456 ABS Capital Partners VII, L.P. Growth Equity 2012 10,000,000 10,804,847 4,819,697 Advent International GPE IX, L.P. Buyout - Mega 2019 50,000,000 18,374,849 26,384,852 Advent International GPE V-B, L.P. Corporate Finance/Buyout 2012 2,817,269 2,583,570 134,164 Advent International GPE V-D, L.P. Corporate Finance/Buyout 2005 3,189,703 3,038,405 139,253 Advent International GPE VI-A, L.P. Corporate Finance/Buyout 2008 9,500,000 9,500,000 1,214,061 Advent International GPE VII-B, L.P. Corporate Finance/Buyout 2012 30,000,000 28,200,000 21,217,670 Advent International GPE VIII-B, L.P. Corporate Finance/Buyout 2016 36,000,000 34,164,000 66,505,926 Affinity Asia Pacific Fund V, L.P. Corporate Finance/Buyout 2018 40,000,000 8,337,432 9,367,900 Alta Partners VIII, L.P. Venture Capital 2006 3,000,000 3,000,000 6,082,383 American Securities Partners VII, L.P.
    [Show full text]
  • PEI Investor Relations, Marketing & Communications Forum 2019
    June 19-20 | Convene, 730 Third Ave | New York Attendee list A.P. Moller Capital Bain Capital C-Bridge Capital Partners FTV Capital ACME Capital Banner Real Estate Group CCMP Capital Advisors Further Capital Partners Actis Barings Centerbridge Partners GCM Grosvenor Advent International Basis Investment Group Cerberus Capital Management General Atlantic AE Industrial Partners Battery Ventures Charlesbank Capital Partners General Catalyst Partners AEA Investors BBH Capital Partners The Chauncey F. Lufkin III Gennx360 AEW Capital Management BC Partners Foundation Genstar Capital AIMA The Beach Company The City of New York, Finance Global Infrastructure Partners Alcentra Berkshire Partners Civitas Capital Grain Management Alcion Ventures Bernhard Capital Partners Coller Capital Gryphon Investors Allianz Capital Partners Bicknell Family Holding Cornell Capital GTCR Altor Equity Partners Company Court Square Capital Partners Halstatt American Securities Bison Crescent Capital Group Hamilton Lane AMP Capital BKM Capital Partners CRV Hammes Angelo Gordon Blackstone Cypress Real Estate Advisors Hammond, Kennedy, Whitney Antares Capital Blue Heron Asset Managment Denham Capital & Co Apollo Global Management Blue Water Energy Duff & Phelps Hancock Capital Management ARC Financial Corp Bridge Investment Group Dyal Capital Partners Harvard Management Company ArcLight Capital Partners BroadVail Capital Edelman HCI Equity Partners Argosy Capital Brook Venture Partners EnCap Investments HGGC Arroyo Energy Investment Brookfield Asset Management EQT Partners
    [Show full text]
  • Investment Section
    Investment Section Investment Overview Authority The Board has the responsibility to invest funds of the System in accordance with guidelines and limitations set forth in the Code and other applicable state law. Act 29 of 1994 authorizes the Board to invest the funds of the System using the “prudent person” standard that allows the Board to consider the probable safety of investments, avoid speculative investments, and invest as people of prudence, discretion, and intelligence would manage their own affairs. Policies and Objectives The Board is responsible for the formulation of investment policies for the System. The overall investment objectives of the System are to: (i) preserve capital in real terms; (ii) maximize total returns while limiting the risk of volatility through diversification; (iii) achieve returns in excess of the policy benchmark (the policy benchmark is a custom index created based on the Board established asset allocation structure to generate a return that meets the actuarial rate of return assumption); (iv) achieve a real rate of return over CPI over time; and, (v) provide sufficient liquidity to meet the current operating needs of the System. To achieve these objectives, the Board meets at least once per year to establish an overall asset allocation plan and investment policies for the System. Implementation of the investment policies is accomplished through external investment management firms who act as agents for the System and through internal investment managers. The Board also retains various investment consultants to assist with the formulation and implementation of investment policies. Operations The Board provides oversight of investment activities through the Finance Committee that makes recommendations to the Board.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Investments June 30, 2012
    Hawaii Employees' Retirement System Statement of Investments June 30, 2012 Partnerships (1) Initial Amount Adjusted Total Annual Venture Capital and Growth Equity Closing Date Commitment Paid Cost Distributions Fair Value IRR ABS Capital Partners VI 06/16/08$4,000,000 $3,642,896 $3,534,851 $297,563 $3,297,205 ABS Capital Partners VII 10/27/11$10,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Alta Partners VIII 09/25/06$3,000,000 $2,250,000 $1,584,586 $1,276,477 $1,019,605 Atlas Venture Fund VII 11/21/05$4,500,000 $4,102,162 $3,850,966 $625,309 $4,562,442 Austin Ventures IX 04/01/05$2,500,000 $2,345,107 $2,234,148 $228,740 $2,407,266 Austin Ventures VI 11/17/98$3,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,517,596 $1,545,683 $468,691 Austin Ventures VII 10/29/99$6,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,597,268 $2,893,012 $1,538,190 Austin Ventures VIII 01/29/01$2,766,667 $2,766,667 $2,235,806 $1,097,759 $2,721,936 Battery Ventures IX 02/24/10$2,500,000 $1,125,040 $1,099,653 $186,667 $1,253,675 Battery Ventures VII 09/30/04$300,000 $288,667 $232,128 $179,479 $175,164 Battery Ventures VIII 07/02/07$1,400,000 $1,366,120 $1,225,667 $353,824 $1,711,517 Battery Ventures VIII Side Fund 08/15/08$630,000 $497,126 $388,506 $318,079 $590,198 Canaan IX 01/06/12$10,000,000 $650,000 $650,000 $0 $584,298 Canaan VII 04/18/05$3,500,000 $3,150,000 $2,991,730 $1,560,870 $3,999,061 Canaan VIII 11/19/07$4,000,000 $2,640,000 $2,545,440 $361,136 $2,920,815 CCEP II (QP) - Riviera 08/11/00$105,033 $105,033 $0 $2,683 $0 ChrysCapital VI 03/26/12$6,000,000 $120,000 $120,000 $0 $74,898 Columbia Capital Equity Partners II 05/27/99$3,894,967
    [Show full text]