<<

Breakthroughs in Tunneling

September 12, 2016

Geotechnical Site Investigations For Tunneling

Greg Raines, PE

Objective

To develop a conceptual model adequate to estimate the range of ground conditions and behavior for excavation, support, and control. support Typical Phases of Subsurface Investigation

Phase 1: Planning Phase – Desk Top Study/Review

Phase 2: Preliminary/Feasibility Design – Initial Field Investigations

Phase 3: Final Design – Additional/Follow-Up Field Investigations

Final Phase: Construction – Continued characterization of site

Typical Phases of Subsurface Investigation

Phase 1: Planning Phase – Desk Top Study/Review  Review:

 Geologic maps Previous reports/investigations

 Aerial photos Case histories

 Develop conceptual geologic/geotechnical model (cross sections), preliminarily identify technical constraints/issues for the project.

 Plan subsurface investigation program. Identify/Collect Available Geotechnical Data in the Project Area

Bridge or control Information can include: structure • Geologic maps • Data from previous reports • Drill hole data • Preliminary mapping

Compile available local data into a database for further evaluation.

Roads or Residential Canals Area Geologic Profiles – Understand Geologic Setting and Collect Specific Data Surface Elevation Maps

Aerial Photo / LiDAR Interpretation

Aerial Photo Diversion

Use digital imagery/LiDAR to map local features prior to field mapping.

Dam

LiDAR Field Geologic Mapping Field Geologic Mapping Structural Data Collection (faults, folds, shears, contacts, alteration zones)

Mapping at the scale of the project/features ! Geomechanical Mapping of Discontinuities (Kinematic Data Analysis)

Tunnel Alignment

Courtesy of Rocscience Develop Preliminary Geologic / Geotech Conceptual Model for the Project

Goal is to: • identify the primary technical considerations, • limitations/constraints, • scope, • purpose, • geotechnical targets, • and site conditions that must be resolved. Typical Phases of Subsurface Investigation

Phase 2: Preliminary/Feasibility Design – Initial Field Investigations  Implement the field drilling/CPT, sampling, testing, geologic/geomorphic mapping, surface & down-hole geophysics, and laboratory testing program.

 This scope can often change based on the findings during the investigation.

 This phase is often where the bulk of the site characterization effort is applied. Typical Phases of Subsurface Investigation

Phase 3: Final Design – Additional/Follow-Up Field Investigations  Target specific geologic/geotechnical features, conditions, or issues that may impact the project design or areas where design modifications have been developed.

 Often specialty field or laboratory testing is performed (e.g. in-situ stress measurement, tri-axial testing, etc..). Subsurface Exploration

 Conventional Drilling  Cone Penetrometer Testing (CPT)  Test Pits  Sampling & Testing  Geophysical Methods

15 A lot of Borings for Shallow Jobs Deep Rock Tunnel – Fewer Borings Establish Drill Hole Configurations (Depth, Location, Vertical, Inclined, Horizontal) Drill Rig Access and Logistics Surface Water

Air Support Underground/confined areas Types of Rigs –

Solid Stem Some typical methods to drill the subsurface include: • Auger • Mud/Air Rotary • Mud/Air Rotary with Casing Advance Hollow Stem • Reverse Circulation • Sonic • Becker Penetration • Large Diameter • Cone Penetration Tests (CPT) • Rock Core

Each of these methods have pros and cons and are suited for specific exploration programs, depending on both the subsurface conditions as well as the data needs for the program. Types of Rigs – Auger

Solid Stem

Hollow Stem

Pros: Cons: • Simple, widely available • Depth limitations • No water, mud, or air • , cobbles limitations • Accommodates most sampling types • Flowing/running ground limitations • Hole collapse (solid stem) Types of Rigs – Mud / Air Rotary

Pros: Cons: • Widely available • Location of G.W. in drill hole • Accommodates most sampling types • Mud impact to sensing/testing zone • Efficient in most ground conditions • Cobble/boulder limitations Types of Rigs – Reverse Circulation

Schramm (dual tube RC air percussion rig)

Pros: Cons: • Efficient • Logging cuttings • Can identify water zones (air) • Sampling limitations • Large diameter (nested ) • Larger equipment/support requirements • High depth capacity Types of Rigs – Sonic Pros: • Efficient • No water, mud or air • Accommodates most sampling types • Nearly full sample recovery • Can detect water in recovered core • Advance through most geotechnical conditions Cons: • Not widely available for investigation purposes • Potential for sample disturbance • Comparatively slightly higher $/m Types of Rigs – Large Diameter Borings

• Physical examination/mapping of the intact geologic conditions Types of Rigs – Horizontal Directional Drilling

Pros: • Effective for bypassing critical or existing features • Minimal ground disturbances

Cons: • Specialized equipment and crew needed • Limits on the stress radius of the pipe

Types of Rigs – (CPT)

Pros: • Widely available • Efficient • No water, mud or air • Advance many holes in comparison Cons: • No samples • Push depth limitations Cone Penetrometer Testing Types of Rigs – Rock Core Test Pits

Used for soil logging, sample collection and lab testing materials anticipated to be encountered. Types of Samples – Drive Samplers (SPT, MC, LPT)

MC Liners

Mod Cal

SPT Energy Calibration Can be performed in most soil types, difficult in -cobbles. Provides information relating to relative density, strength, and applicability of some ground improvement methods (e.g., soil mixing, jet grouting, chemical grouting) Types of Samples – “Undisturbed” Samples

Shelby Tube Pitcher Sampler

Typically applied to soft-medium, stiff cohesive in order to test strength, stiffness, Piston consolidation, etc… Sampler Excellent

Fair to Good

Poor to Fair

Forms basis for many rock mass classification systems and provides information on the distribution/magnitude of rock fractures relating to rock mass strength, modulus, permeability, and Very Poor to Poor groutability. In Situ Testing – Pressure Meter / Dilatometer In Situ Testing – Testing

 Packer Testing (single and double)  Constant Head  Falling Head

Tunnel Alignment

Relates to permeability and groutability of a formation (rock or soil) for parameters used in analysis, and design. Packer Tests

Inflation Tube

Inflatable Packer End Cap

Test Zone Perforated Screen

End Plug Packer Tests

K(cm/s)

0.0E+00 2.0E-04 4.0E-04 6.0E-04 8.0E-04 1.0E-03 1.2E-03 1.4E-03 1.6E-03 1.8E-03 2.0E-03

1

2

3

4

5 Hydraulic Jacking and Fracturing Tests

Jacking Fracturing

Pressurization of is done until fracturing of rock in borehole wall. The rock will generally fracture in the direction perpendicular to the minimum stress direction σ3. The fracture alignment is viewed using borehole televiewer or impression packer. The intermediate and vertical stresses are then calculated from the estimated minimum stress value Hazardous Gases & Contaminants Underground

• Methane (CH4) • Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) • Carbon Dioxide (CO2) • Gasoline Vapors • Chlorinated Solvents (PCE, DCE, & TCE)

Typical Drill Hole Logs

Rock Log Soil Log Typical Drill Hole Logs

Soil:  Lithology Rocks:  Soil type (USCS)  Rock Type  Color  Recovery, RQD,  Consistency / GSI density  Color  Grain size  Texture distribution  Degree of General:  Moisture weathering  Drill rate  Cementation  Strength  Rig Behavior  Plasticity (clays)  Hardness  Circulation return  Roundness  Structure  Depth to water  Discontinuities:  Instrumentation • Type  Drill difficulties • Width  Shift changes Roughness Code • Infilling Amount  Testing intervals and Slickensided & Type results Polished • Surface Shape

Smooth • Roughness

• Spacing (Joint Rough Very Rough Sets) Data Compilation Summary Sheets Geologic Profiles – Understand Geologic Setting Geophysics

 Down hole geophysics  Seismic reflection*  Seismic refraction  Resistivity  Ground penetrating radar  Seismic tomography*  Bathymetry  Magnetics*

(*Not described in this presentation) Oriented Down-Hole Televiewer – Optical & Acoustic

Optical Acoustic Down-Hole Televiewer Geophysics – Caliper & Gamma

Records Records magnitude of deviations of natural gamma the borehole ray decay diameter indicative of indicating mineral intervals of bearing rock wash-out or and soil cave-in Suspension Logging Cross Hole Geophysics/Tomography Seismic Refraction and and Resistivity

Resistivity Refraction Compression, P-Wave Marine Geophysics Seismic Reflection Profile Magnetic Survey 3D Resistivity Imaging Ground Penetrating Radar – (Example: Performed Inside Tunnel) Groundwater and Hydrogeologic Conditions

Fractured Rock Tunnel Alignment Shaft

Screen

Clay

Screen Highly permeable

Screen -gravel

Typical stand-pipe Multi-level vibrating Fully Grouted Multi- wire piezometer level vibrating wire Multi-level Single piezometer Pump / Slug Tests

Slug test assembly Typical Lab Testing

• Soil – USCS classification – Strength & Modulus – Moisture/density – Plasticity – Gradation –

Unified System (USCS) Grain Size Analysis

1” ½” #4 #10 #40 #200 Plasticity Testing (: PI, LL, PL) Hydrometer Test Stickyness Index

Medium

Low

High

EPBM Clogging Potential Density & Strength Specialized Lab Testing – Soil Abrasivity Typical Lab Testing

• Rock – Rock classification – Compressive/ – Tensile strength (Brazilian) – Moisture/density – Durability, abrasivity, slake, toughness Unconfined and Point Load Index Tests Specialized Lab Testing – Punch Penetration and Cerchar Tests Slake Durability Thin Section Analysis

Granitic Porphyry Field Investigation Results

Geotechnical Reports (Data Reports, Design Reports, & Baseline Report) Typical Phases of Subsurface Investigation

Final Phase: Construction  Confirmation investigations, sampling/testing, and monitoring of site conditions encountered and/or results obtained from the ground improvement construction process.

Construction Testing and Observations Construction is part of site characterization!

 The actual conditions to define the site conditions, engineering parameters, groundwater, and ground behavior should be evaluated during construction (construction is the last phase of the site investigation). Construction Testing and Observations Construction is part of site characterization!

 Map conditions encountered as applicable  Probe ahead to determine ground and groundwater conditions  Investigate specific problems such as faults or other features  Use instrumentation and monitoring Pilot Uncertainty Cannot be Eliminated

“Surprises Are Inevitable - There will always be unexpected ground conditions and neither the owner nor the design team can completely eliminate surprises from complex underground projects.” Gould, 1995

Construction Testing and Observations Construction is part of site characterization!

Tunnel encountered column that was not previously identified.

Location is under rail line, so no access prior to construction.

Questions?