Role of the Intracellular Domains in the Regulation and the Signaling of the Human Bradykinin B2 Receptor

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Role of the Intracellular Domains in the Regulation and the Signaling of the Human Bradykinin B2 Receptor Aus der Abteilung für Klinische Chemie und Klinische Biochemie in der Chirurgischen Klinik-Innenstadt der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Leiterin der Abteilung: Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Dr. med. habil. Marianne Jochum Role of the intracellular domains in the regulation and the signaling of the human bradykinin B2 receptor Dissertation zum Erwerb des Doktorgrades der Humanbiologie an der Medizinischen Fakultät der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität zu München Vorgelegt von Göran Wennerberg aus Stockholm 2010 Mit Genehmigung der Medizinischen Fakultät der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Berichterstatter: PD Dr. rer. nat. Alexander Faussner Mitberichterstatter: Prof. Dr. Nikolaus Plesnila Prof. Dr. Franz-Xaver Beck Mitbetreuung durch den promovierten Mitarbeiter: Dekan: Prof. Dr. med. Dr. h.c. M. Reiser, FACR,FRCR Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 27.01.2010 CONTENTS………………………………………………………………………………………I ABBREVIATIONS………………………………………………………………………………V A ZUSAMMENFASSUNG ............................................................................................ 1 B INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 4 B.1 The kallikrein-kinin system (KKS) B.1.1 Historic background............................................................................................................................................4 B.1.2 Kinins...................................................................................................................................................................4 B.1.3 Kinin receptors ....................................................................................................................................................5 B.1.4 The signaling pathways of the kinin receptors..................................................................................................6 B.1.5 Regulation of kinin receptors .............................................................................................................................7 B.2 G proteins and G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) B.2.1 G proteins ............................................................................................................................................................8 B.2.2 Functionality........................................................................................................................................................8 B.2.3 Superfamily of GPCRs .......................................................................................................................................9 B.2.4 The highly conserved DRY motif ....................................................................................................................10 B.2.5 Crystal structures of GPCRs.............................................................................................................................11 B.3 Receptor antagonists B.4 Functional selectivity C AIMS OF THE THESIS............................................................................................ 16 D MATERIAL AND METHODS................................................................................... 17 D.1 Material D.1.1 Equipment .........................................................................................................................................................17 D.1.2 Chemicals and materials...................................................................................................................................18 D.1.3 Strains and cell lines .........................................................................................................................................21 D.1.4 Expression vectors ............................................................................................................................................22 D.1.5 Oligonucleotides used as primers for PCR amplification ..............................................................................23 D.1.6 Computer programs and Data analysis............................................................................................................23 D.1.7 Solutions............................................................................................................................................................24 CONTENTS I D.2 Methods D.2.1 Molecular biological methods..........................................................................................................................25 D.2.1.1 Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)............................................................................................................25 D.2.1.2 Attachment of the restriction sites ...........................................................................................................25 D.2.1.3 Site-directed mutagenesis.........................................................................................................................26 D.2.1.4 Generation of the B2eYFP chimera .........................................................................................................28 D.2.1.5 DNA cleavage with restriction endonucelases .......................................................................................30 D.2.1.6 Agarose gel electrophoresis .....................................................................................................................30 D.2.1.7 Extraction of DNA fragments from agarose gels ...................................................................................30 D.2.1.8 Ligation of DNA fragments .....................................................................................................................31 D.2.1.9 LB growth medium and plates for culture of E. coli strains ..................................................................31 D.2.1.10 Transformation of E.coli...........................................................................................................................31 D.2.1.11 Colony-PCR ..............................................................................................................................................32 D.2.1.12 Plasmid preparation from E.coli...............................................................................................................32 D.2.1.13 Confirmation of correctness of DNA sequence ......................................................................................32 D.2.1.14 Determination of DNA concentration......................................................................................................32 D.2.2 Cell culture methods .........................................................................................................................................34 D.2.2.1 Culture of mammalian cells .....................................................................................................................34 D.2.2.2 Cell freezing and thawing ........................................................................................................................34 D.2.2.3 Flp-In expression system .........................................................................................................................34 D.2.2.4 Transfection of HEK 293 cells ................................................................................................................36 3 D.2.3 [ H]Bradykinin binding studies .......................................................................................................................37 D.2.3.1 Expression levels of constructs................................................................................................................37 D.2.3.2 Equilibrium binding experiments at 37°C and 4°C................................................................................37 3 D.2.3.3 Competitive inhibition [ H]BK binding to cold drugs. ..........................................................................38 D.2.4 Determination of second messengers after Gq/11 activation ...........................................................................38 D.2.4.1 Measurement of total inositol phosphate (IP) release ............................................................................38 D.2.4.2 Basal and stimulated IP accumulation in fibroblasts HF-15 after pro-longed stimulation ..................39 2+ D.2.4.3 Time and Concentration-dependent release of intracellular [Ca ].......................................................39 D.2.5 Receptor sequestration and ligand internalization assays ..............................................................................40 D.2.5.1 Down-regulation assay .............................................................................................................................40 3 3 D.2.5.2 Internalization of [ H]BK or [ H]NPC17331..........................................................................................40 D.2.6 Protein biochemical methods ...........................................................................................................................41 D.2.6.1 SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.................................................................................................41 D.2.6.2 Immunoblotting after solubilization with RIPA .....................................................................................41 D.2.6.3 Protein levels of B2 receptor during prolonged agonist/antagonist treatment ......................................41 D.2.6.4
Recommended publications
  • 2020 Prior Authorization Criteria
    2020 PRIOR AUTHORIZATION CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS abiraterone tablet ...................................................................................................................... 217 ABRAXANE .............................................................................................................................. 131 ACTIMMUNE .............................................................................................................................. 14 ADASUVE ................................................................................................................................... 27 ADEMPAS ................................................................................................................................ 197 AFINITOR ................................................................................................................................. 217 AFINITOR DISPERZ ................................................................................................................. 217 AIMOVIG ..................................................................................................................................... 15 ALECENSA ............................................................................................................................... 217 ALIMTA ..................................................................................................................................... 131 ALIQOPA .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • DRUGS REQUIRING PRIOR AUTHORIZATION in the MEDICAL BENEFIT Page 1
    Effective Date: 08/01/2021 DRUGS REQUIRING PRIOR AUTHORIZATION IN THE MEDICAL BENEFIT Page 1 Therapeutic Category Drug Class Trade Name Generic Name HCPCS Procedure Code HCPCS Procedure Code Description Anti-infectives Antiretrovirals, HIV CABENUVA cabotegravir-rilpivirine C9077 Injection, cabotegravir and rilpivirine, 2mg/3mg Antithrombotic Agents von Willebrand Factor-Directed Antibody CABLIVI caplacizumab-yhdp C9047 Injection, caplacizumab-yhdp, 1 mg Cardiology Antilipemic EVKEEZA evinacumab-dgnb C9079 Injection, evinacumab-dgnb, 5 mg Cardiology Hemostatic Agent BERINERT c1 esterase J0597 Injection, C1 esterase inhibitor (human), Berinert, 10 units Cardiology Hemostatic Agent CINRYZE c1 esterase J0598 Injection, C1 esterase inhibitor (human), Cinryze, 10 units Cardiology Hemostatic Agent FIRAZYR icatibant J1744 Injection, icatibant, 1 mg Cardiology Hemostatic Agent HAEGARDA c1 esterase J0599 Injection, C1 esterase inhibitor (human), (Haegarda), 10 units Cardiology Hemostatic Agent ICATIBANT (generic) icatibant J1744 Injection, icatibant, 1 mg Cardiology Hemostatic Agent KALBITOR ecallantide J1290 Injection, ecallantide, 1 mg Cardiology Hemostatic Agent RUCONEST c1 esterase J0596 Injection, C1 esterase inhibitor (recombinant), Ruconest, 10 units Injection, lanadelumab-flyo, 1 mg (code may be used for Medicare when drug administered under Cardiology Hemostatic Agent TAKHZYRO lanadelumab-flyo J0593 direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self-administered) Cardiology Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension EPOPROSTENOL (generic)
    [Show full text]
  • Diet-Induced Obesity Mediated by the JNK/DIO2 Signal Transduction Pathway
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 24, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Diet-induced obesity mediated by the JNK/DIO2 signal transduction pathway Santiago Vernia,1 Julie Cavanagh-Kyros,1,2 Tamera Barrett,1,2 Dae Young Jung,1 Jason K. Kim,1,3 and Roger J. Davis1,2,4 1Program in Molecular Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts 01605, USA; 2Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Worcester, Massachusetts 01605, USA; 3Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Diabetes, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts 01605, USA The cJun N-terminal kinase (JNK) signaling pathway is a key mediator of metabolic stress responses caused by consuming a high-fat diet, including the development of obesity. To test the role of JNK, we examined diet- induced obesity in mice with targeted ablation of Jnk genes in the anterior pituitary gland. These mice exhibited an increase in the pituitary expression of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), an increase in the blood concentration of thyroid hormone (T4), increased energy expenditure, and markedly reduced obesity compared with control mice. The increased amount of pituitary TSH was caused by reduced expression of type 2 iodothyronine deiodinase (Dio2), a gene that is required for T4-mediated negative feedback regulation of TSH expression. These data establish a molecular mechanism that accounts for the regulation of energy expenditure and the development of obesity by the JNK signaling pathway. [Keywords: DIO2; JNK; obesity; pituitary gland; thyroid hormone] Supplemental material is available for this article. Received June 5, 2013; revised version accepted October 3, 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Bradykinin B2 Receptor Modulates Renal Prostaglandin E2 and Nitric Oxide
    (Hypertension. 1997;29:757-762.) © 1997 American Heart Association, Inc. Bradykinin B2 Receptor Modulates Renal Prostaglandin E2 and Nitric Oxide Helmy M. Siragy; Ayad A. Jaffa; Harry S. Margolius the Department of Internal Medicine, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville, and the Departments of Pharmacology and Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina and Ralph A. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston. Correspondence to Helmy M. Siragy, MD, Department of Medicine, Box 482, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville, VA 22908. ABSTRACT Bradykinin and lys-bradykinin generated intrarenally appear to be important renal paracrine hormones. However, the renal effects of endogenously generated bradykinin are still not clearly defined. In this study, we measured acute changes in renal excretory and hemodynamic functions and renal cortical interstitial fluid levels of bradykinin, prostaglandin E2, and cGMP in response to an acute intrarenal arterial infusion of the bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist Hoe 140 (icatibant), cyclooxygenase inhibitor indomethacin, or nitric oxide synthase inhibitor NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA) given individually or combined in uninephrectomized, conscious dogs (n=10) in low sodium balance. Icatibant caused a significant decrease in urine flow, urinary sodium excretion, and renal plasma flow rate (each P<.001). Glomerular filtration rate did not change during icatibant administration. Icatibant produced an unexpected large increase in renal interstitial fluid bradykinin (P<.0001) while decreasing renal interstitial fluid prostaglandin E2 and cGMP (each P<.001). Both indomethacin and L-NMMA when given individually caused significant antidiuresis and antinatriuresis and decreased renal blood flow (each P<.001). Glomerular filtration rate decreased during L-NMMA administration (P<.001) and did not change during indomethacin administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Icatibant (Firazyr) Reference Number: CP.PHAR.178 Effective Date: 03/16 Coding Implications Last Review Date: 03/17 Revision Log
    Clinical Policy: Icatibant (Firazyr) Reference Number: CP.PHAR.178 Effective Date: 03/16 Coding Implications Last Review Date: 03/17 Revision Log See Important Reminder at the end of this policy for important regulatory and legal information. Description The intent of the criteria is to ensure that patients follow selection elements established by Centene® clinical policy for icatibant (Firazyr®). Policy/Criteria It is the policy of health plans affiliated with Centene Corporation® that Firazyr is medically necessary when one of the following criteria is met: I. Initial Approval Criteria A. Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) (must meet all): 1. Diagnosis of HAE confirmed by one of the following (a or b): a. Low C4 level and low C1-INH antigenic or functional level (see Appendix B); b. Normal C4 level and normal C1-INH levels, and all of the following (i - iii): i. History of recurrent angioedema; ii. Family history of angioedema; iii. Other types of angioedema have been ruled out (e.g., ACE-I/ARB-associated or other drug-induced angioedema, allergic angioedema, nonhistaminergic angioedema); 2. Prescribed for treatment of acute attacks; 3. Prescribed dose of Firazyr does not exceed 30 mg per dose (1 syringe per dose) with up to 3 doses administered in a 24 hour period. Approval duration: 12 months (no more than 6 doses per month) B. Other diagnoses/indications: Refer to CP.PHAR.57 - Global Biopharm Policy. II. Continued Approval A. Hereditary Angioedema (must meet all): 1. Currently receiving medication via Centene benefit or member has previously met initial approval criteria; 2. Documentation of positive response to therapy; 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Prescription Drug Use and Spending in Minnesota - a Data Short Take
    Prescription Drug Use and Spending in Minnesota - A Data Short Take - Health Economics Program March 2020 PROTECTING, MAINTAINING AND IMPROVING THE HEALTH OF ALL MINNESOTANS What Is In This Data Short Take? This data short take presents a number of use cases generated from newly released public use files (PUFs) on prescription drug use & spending in Minnesota. These and other PUFs have been derived from the Minnesota All Payer Claims Database, a repository of health care claims data that supports statewide analyses of health care costs, quality, and utilization. PUFs are available from the Health Economics Program by download at: www.health.state.mn.us/data/apcd/publicusefiles/ 2 Background on Prescription Drugs • Retail prescription drug spending in Minnesota has exceeded $4.5 billion each year since 20121 • Spending is rising at a rate much higher than growth in number of prescriptions2 • There has been a lack of detailed data on the prescription drug market, in general, and particularly at the state level • The prescription drug public use files (PUFs) are intended to: Enhance price transparency Inform stakeholders about patterns of prescription drug use in Minnesota Contribute to the development of policy solutions 1 Minnesota All Payer Claims Database 3 2Pharmaceutical Spending and Use in Minnesota: 2009-2013. Minnesota All Payer Claims Database Issue Brief, November 2016. Prescription Drug PUF Designs • Two prescription drug PUFs, each including 2012 and 2016 data, are aggregated at different levels: Summary file (non-proprietary
    [Show full text]
  • European Society for Immunodeficiencies (ESID)
    Journal of Clinical Immunology https://doi.org/10.1007/s10875-020-00754-1 ORIGINAL ARTICLE European Society for Immunodeficiencies (ESID) and European Reference Network on Rare Primary Immunodeficiency, Autoinflammatory and Autoimmune Diseases (ERN RITA) Complement Guideline: Deficiencies, Diagnosis, and Management Nicholas Brodszki1 & Ashley Frazer-Abel2 & Anete S. Grumach3 & Michael Kirschfink4 & Jiri Litzman5 & Elena Perez6 & Mikko R. J. Seppänen7 & Kathleen E. Sullivan8 & Stephen Jolles9 Received: 5 June 2019 /Accepted: 20 January 2020 # The Author(s) 2020 Abstract This guideline aims to describe the complement system and the functions of the constituent pathways, with particular focus on primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs) and their diagnosis and management. The complement system is a crucial part of the innate immune system, with multiple membrane-bound and soluble components. There are three distinct enzymatic cascade pathways within the complement system, the classical, alternative and lectin pathways, which converge with the cleavage of central C3. Complement deficiencies account for ~5% of PIDs. The clinical consequences of inherited defects in the complement system are protean and include increased susceptibility to infection, autoimmune diseases (e.g., systemic lupus erythematosus), age-related macular degeneration, renal disorders (e.g., atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome) and angioedema. Modern complement analysis allows an in-depth insight into the functional and molecular basis of nearly all complement deficiencies. However, therapeutic options remain relatively limited for the majority of complement deficiencies with the exception of hereditary angioedema and inhibition of an overactivated complement system in regulation defects. Current management strategies for complement disor- ders associated with infection include education, family testing, vaccinations, antibiotics and emergency planning. Keywords Complement .
    [Show full text]
  • P&T Summary 4Q2019
    BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH QUARTER 2019 FORMULARY AND MEDICATION POLICY UPDATES EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2020 for Large Group, Small Group, and Individual & Family Plans The Blue Shield of California (BSC) Pharmacy and Therapeutics (P&T) Committee, consisting of network physicians and pharmacists, regularly evaluates drugs for formulary inclusion and medication policy coverage criteria. The fourth quarter 2019 P&T Committee decisions on formulary changes and medication policy changes, which apply to Commercial members with an outpatient drug benefit, are summarized below: PHARMACY BENEFIT FORMULARY UPDATE: Please refer to the appropriate drug formulary posted on our website for the following information: • Quantity limits, if applicable, for specific drugs • Formulary status of newly available strengths of existing drugs. Note: The formulary status of newly available strengths of existing drugs will have the same formulary status as the existing strengths unless otherwise noted. • Non-formulary and non-preferred generic drugs that do not require prior authorization or step therapy • Brand-name medications that are now non-formulary or non-preferred because these medications have newly available generic equivalents covered on the formulary Formularies are available at blueshieldca.com/pharmacy. Select the appropriate drug formulary – “Standard Drug Formulary” or “Plus Drug Formulary”. Summary of changes to the Medicare formularies are available at blueshieldca.com/pharmacy. Select “Medicare Drug Formulary”, then select the appropriate
    [Show full text]
  • August 2019 D&T Decisions
    … from the Drugs and Therapeutics Committee _____________________________________________________________________________________ Issue #67: Aug.1, 2019 Inside this Issue… Additions to Hospital Formulary Basaglar and Lantus are long-acting recombinant human insulin Insulin glargine, BasaglarTM analogues with identical amino acid sequences. Basaglar is less Ursodiol, URSO® expensive than Lantus and is a full benefit on the NS Provincial Icatibant, Firazyr® Drug Plan Formulary (i.e., Pharmacare) while Lantus remains Vernakalant, BrinavessTM restricted with criteria. There are two Phase III randomized trials (one open-label and one double blind) comparing Basaglar to Dornase Alfa, Pulmozyme® Ivabradine, LancoraTM Lantus that demonstrated non-inferiority. Basaglar has been Ulipristal, EllaTM added to the NSHA Hospital Formulary (no restrictions) and Lantus remains on the Hospital Formulary with restrictions. Inhaler Devices: Indacaterol, Onbrez® Breezhaler® ® Aclidinium, Tudorza® Genuair® Ursodiol, URSO Glycopyrronium, Seebri® Breezhaler® Ursodiol is approved by Health Canada for the management of Umeclidinium, Incruse Ellipta cholestatic liver diseases, such as primary biliary cirrhosis. Fluticasone furoate, Arnuity Ellipta Ursodiol is a hydrophilic bile acid preparation that is present in low Mometasone, Asmanex® Twisthaler® concentrations in normal bile. Use of oral ursodiol increases the Aclidinium + formoterol, Duaklir® Genuair® proportion of hydrophilic bile acids replacing and altering toxic Indacaterol + Glycopyrronium, Ultibro® concentrations
    [Show full text]
  • GENERIC Apis
    GENERIC APIs 1 LEADING PARTNER IN TIDES With almost 50 years of expertise in peptide and small molecule synthesis Bachem has an outstanding track record in large-scale manufacturing and excellent product quality. 2 3 GENERIC PORTFOLIO PEPTIDE GENERIC APIs Generic API CEP/DMF Application Site Atosiban DMF Reproductive Medicine CH Bivalirudin DMF Cardiovascular Disease CH Buserelin DMF Oncology, Reproductive Medicine CH Desmopressin Acetate CEP, DMF Diabetes Insipidus USA Exenatide Acetate DMF Diabetes Mellitus USA Glucagon DMF Diabetes Mellitus CH Gonadorelin Acetate CEP, DMF Oncology, Reproductive Medicine CH Goserelin Acetate CEP, DMF Oncology, Reproductive Medicine CH Icatibant Acetate DMF Hereditary Angioedema CH Lanreotide DMF Oncology USA Leuprolide Acetate CEP, DMF Oncology CH Octreotide Acetate DMF Oncology CH Somatostatin CEP Gastritis CH Teriparatide Acetate / DMF Osteoporosis USA pTH (1-34) (human) Tetracosactide DMF Oncology, Diagnostics CH Triptorelin Acetate DMF Oncology, Reproductive Medicine CH Triptorelin Pamoate DMF Oncology, Reproductive Medicine CH (Arg8)-Vasopressin DMF Diabetes Insipidus USA SMALL MOLECULE APIs Generic API CEP/DMF Application Site Antazoline Hydrochloride DMF Ophthalmology CH Antazoline Phosphate DMF Ophthalmology CH Antazoline Sulfate DMF Ophthalmology CH Carbidopa CEP, DMF Epilepsy and Parkinson‘s Disease CH Etomidate CEP, DMF Sedatives and Anesthetics CH Propofol CEP, DMF Sedatives and Anesthetics CH 4 PIPELINE Generic API Application Degarelix* Oncology Glepaglutide* Short Bowel Syndrome Liraglutide* Diabetes Mellitus Semaglutide* Diabetes Mellitus Teduglutide* Short Bowel Syndrome Tirzepatide* Diabetes Mellitus Please note: Some products may be restricted in certain countries. * Bachem provides this product solely for uses within the scope of any statute or law providing for an immunity, exemption, or exception to patent infringement (“Exempted Uses”), including but not limited to 35 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • 84 November 2008 Produced by NHS Tayside Drug and Therapeutics Committee Medicines Advisory Group (MAG)
    TAYSIDE PRESCRIBER Tayside DTC Supplement No 84 November 2008 Produced by NHS Tayside Drug and Therapeutics Committee Medicines Advisory Group (MAG) SMC Advice issued in November 2008 Medicine Indication Local recommendation Comments and useful category links Ambrisentan tablets Treatment of patients with class Restricted for use within SMC advice (Volibris®) II and III pulmonary arterial national treatment centre SPC link hypertension to improve exercise capacity Anidulafungin powder and Treatment of invasive Pending AMG decision SMC advice solvent (Ecalta®) - candidiasis in adult non- SPC link Resubmission neutropenic patients Bosentan film-coated tablets Class II pulmonary arterial Not recommended SMC advice (Tracleer®) - hypertension Bosentan was previously Non submission accepted in 2003 for restricted use in grade III pulmonary arterial hypertension Icatibant solution for Symptomatic treatment of acute Not recommended SMC advice subcutaneous injection attacks of hereditary (Firazyr®) angioedema in adults Insulin glulisine solution for Treatment of adolescents and Non-formulary SMC advice subcutaneous injection children, 6 years or older with SPC link (Apidra®) - Abbreviated diabetes mellitus where a short Diabetes Handbook submission acting insulin analogue is appropriate Insulin lispro solution for Adults and children with Non-formulary SMC advice injection (Humalog® diabetes mellitus SPC link KwikPen) - Diabetes Handbook Abbreviated submission Insulin lispro (Humalog® Patients with diabetes mellitus, Non-formulary SMC advice Mix25
    [Show full text]
  • Species-Specific Pharmacology of Maximakinin, An
    Species-specific pharmacology of maximakinin, an amphibian homologue of bradykinin: putative prodrug activity at the human B2 receptor and peptidase resistance in rats Xavier Charest-Morin1,*, Hélène Bachelard2,*, Melissa Jean2 and Francois Marceau1 1 Axe Microbiologie-Infectiologie et Immunologie, CHU de Québec-Université Laval and Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada 2 Axe endocrinologie et néphrologie, CHU de Québec-Université Laval and Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada * These authors contributed equally to this work. ABSTRACT Maximakinin (MK), an amphibian peptide possessing the C-terminal sequence of bradykinin (BK), is a BK B2 receptor (B2R) agonist eliciting prolonged signaling. We reinvestigated this 19-mer for species-specific pharmacologic profile, in vivo confirmation of resistance to inactivation by angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE), value as a module for the design of fusion proteins that bind to the B2R in mammalian species and potential activity as a histamine releaser. Competition of the binding 3 of [ H]BK to recombinant human myc-B2Rs in cells that express these receptors revealed that MK possessed a tenuous fraction (<0.1%) of the affinity of BK, despite being only ∼20-fold less potent than BK in a contractility assay based on the human isolated umbilical vein. These findings are reconciled by the generation of C-terminal fragments, like Lys-Gly-Pro-BK and Gly-Pro-BK, when the latent MK is incubated with Submitted 24 October 2016 human venous tissue (LC-MS), supporting activation via hydrolysis upstream of the Accepted 14 December 2016 BK sequence. At the rat recombinant myc-B2R, MK had a lesser affinity than that of BK, Published 18 January 2017 but with a narrower margin (6.2-fold, radioligand binding competition).
    [Show full text]