An Bord Snip
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Irish Business and Society: Governing, Participating and Transforming in the 21St Century
Technological University Dublin ARROW@TU Dublin Books/Book Chapters School of Marketing 2011-1 Irish Business and Society: Governing, Participating and Transforming in the 21st Century John Hogan Technological University Dublin, [email protected] Paul Donnelly Technological University Dublin, [email protected] Brendan O'Rourke Technological University Dublin, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://arrow.tudublin.ie/buschmarbk Part of the Business Commons, Law Commons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Hogan, J., Donnelly, P., O’Rourke, B. (eds) (2010) Irish Business and Society: Governing, Participating and Transforming in the 21st Century. Dublin: Gill and Macmillan. This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Marketing at ARROW@TU Dublin. It has been accepted for inclusion in Books/Book Chapters by an authorized administrator of ARROW@TU Dublin. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 License Edited by John Hogan Paul F. Donnelly & Brendan K. O’Rourke Irish Business & Society Governing, Participating & Transforming in the 21st Century Irish Business and Society Governing, Participating and Transforming in the 21st Century Edited by JOHN HOGAN, PAUL F. DONNELLY AND BRENDAN K. O'ROURKE 'Irish Business and Societ), presents the best of Irish social science, neatly packaged around themes of governance, participation and transformation. Many of these original chapters are brilliantly crafted, and while they show an Ireland slipping off a time of rapid growth, themes of hope abound in enterprise, social and economic partnership, civil society, social inclusion and Europeanization. -
A Very Political Project: Charles Haughey, Social Partnership and the Pursuit of an “Irish Economic Miracle”, 1969-92
Dublin City University School of Law and Government A Very Political Project: Charles Haughey, Social Partnership and the pursuit of an “Irish economic miracle”, 1969-92 By Philip O’Connor Thesis completed under the supervision of Prof. Gary Murphy in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Dublin City University, School of Law and Government January 2020 Declaration I hereby certify that this material, which I now submit for assessment on the programme of study leading to the award of Doctor of Philosophy is entirely my own work, and that I have exercised reasonable care to ensure that the work is original, does not to the best of my knowledge breach any law of copyright, and has not been taken from the work of others save and to the extent that such work has been cited and acknowledged within the text of my work. Signed: ________________ (Candidate) DCU ID: 54160707 Date: 6th Jan. 2020 Table of Contents Table of Contents 3 Acknowledgements 6 Abstract 7 Introduction 8 Chapter 1: Theoretical contentions and competing literatures Contentions 14 The political economy of policy change 15 Policy and partnership in the economic transformation 19 Ireland’s social partnership in comparative analyses 22 Other literature 24 Part 1: Leaps, Bounds and Reversals, 1945-86 29 Chapter 2: The quest for socio-economic organisation, 1945-70 Irish politics and economic interests before 1945 30 Fits and starts: Irish “tripartitism” 1945-56 36 Lemass’s economic institutionalism 1957-63 40 System stresses: from expansion to dissolution -
Conflict Resolution and Language Policy and Planning in the North of Ireland and Quebec / Canada
Notes Introduction 1. The author has been Chief Executive of the Irish language non-governmental organisation POBAL since 1999. POBAL means ‘community’. 2. Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency, Northern Ireland Census 2001. 1 A Silent War: Conflict Resolution and Language Policy and Planning in the North of Ireland and Quebec / Canada 1. ‘The struggle for human rights is inevitably a struggle for power, and one that is generally tied to resources.’ Mary Robinson, Human Rights: A Global Perspective, UN Global Compact U.S. Network Meeting, ‘Business and Human Rights’ 28 April 2008, Harvard Business School. 2. Henry Patterson, Truth and Reconciliation in NI? Not much hope of either, Parliamentary Brief, 9 February 2009, http://www.parliamentarybrief.com/ articles/2/new/truth-and-969_67_0.html, downloaded on 18/02/2009. 3. http://daccessdds.un.org/doc/RESOLUTION/GEN/NR0/043/88/IMG/NR004388. pdf?OpenElement.downloaded 24/02/09. 4. Anonymous (1996, p. 258) Human Rights in Peace Negotiations, Human Rights Quarterly 18, pp. 249–258. 5. Henry Patterson, Truth and Reconciliation in NI? Not much hope of either, Parliamentary Brief, 9 February 2009, http://www.parliamentarybrief.com/ articles/2/new/truth-and-969_67_0.html, downloaded on 18/02/2009. 6. See for example Buchanan (1991, 1997a, 1997b), Cassese (1998), Copp (1997, 1999), Epseill (1980). 7. UN General Assembly Resolution 1514 (XV), http://daccessdds.un.org/ doc/RESOLUTION/GEN/NR0/152/88/IMG/NR015288.pdf?OpenElement, downloaded 01/03/09. 8. The term ‘nationalist’ in the context of the north’s political parties implies support for an all-Ireland political framework. -
Regulation in Ireland: History, Structure, Style and Reform
UCD GEARY INSTITUTE DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Regulation in Ireland: History, Structure, Style and Reform Ciara Brown and Colin Scott UCD Centre for Regulation and Governance [email protected] September 2010 This is the first working paper in a series within the Regulatory Capacity and Networked Governance Project, funded by the Irish Research Council for Humanities and Social Sciences and the Institute of Public Administration. A second paper is published under the title ‘Regulatory Capacity and Networked Governance’. We are grateful to project colleagues Niamh Hardiman, Muiris MacCarthaigh and Imelda Maher for their advice and support and to Richard Boyle of the IPA for comments on an earlier draft. 1. Introduction Regulation as an instrument of government has seen remarkable growth across European countries since the 1980s (Levi-Faur 2005). In this working paper we examine the development of regulation in Ireland and of developments in reform, reviewing such literature as is available. The working paper forms part of a larger project concerned with the investigation of regulatory capacity in Ireland. In this project we are examining how the use by government, agencies and others (such as self-regulatory bodies and EU institutions) of their capacities for regulation is shaped, not simply by instrument choice, but also by institutional factors, drawing on concepts of ‘national styles of regulation (Vogel, 1986). We have a particular interest in the ways in which participation in networks affects regulatory capacity. The theoretical framework for analysing the linkage between regulatory capacity networked governance is set out in the second project Working Paper, ‘Regulatory Capacity and Networked Governance’. -
Clusters and Cluster Initiatives: the Role of Collaboration and Social Capital in Building a System of Innovation in Ireland
CLUSTERS AND CLUSTER INITIATIVES: THE ROLE OF COLLABORATION AND SOCIAL CAPITAL IN BUILDING A SYSTEM OF INNOVATION IN IRELAND Patrick R. Ivory B.A. (Econ), M.Litt. University: Dublin City University Supervisors: Professor David Jacobson Dr. Siobhain McGovern School: Business January 2012 Submitted for the degree of PhD at Dublin City University I hereby certify that this material, which I now submit for assessment on the programme of study leading to the award of PhD is entirely my own work, that I have exercised reasonable care to ensure that the work is original, and does not to the best of my knowledge breach any law of copyright, and has not been taken from the work of others save and to the extent that such work has been cited and acknowledged within the text of my work. Signed: ____________ (Candidate) ID No.: 56121831 Date: January 2012 i Acknowledgements I wish to acknowledge the help of a number of people in the research conducted in this thesis. The generosity of the people involved in the different cluster initiatives who provided interviews for the thesis was greatly appreciated. A deeper understanding of how collaboration works would not have been possible without the input and insights of these people (too many to name) from industry, universities, government and state agencies. Thanks is also due to colleagues in my DCU Professional Doctorate Programme (PDP) ‗action set‘ Sinead Brennan, David Kenefick, Peter Robbins and Anthony Briody. I very much appreciated the support of my employers IBEC, Danny McCoy and Brendan Butler, in undertaking the thesis. I would also like to thank my good friend, and IBEC colleague, Tony Donohoe for proof reading the entire thesis. -
Irish Political Review, August 2009
Bowen And Dillon Globalizers Wet Dream? People's Verdict Manus O'Riordan Philip O'Connor Labour Comment page 15 page 7 back page IRISH POLITICAL REVIEW August 2009 Vol.24, No.8 ISSN 0790-7672 and Northern Star incorporating Workers' Weekly Vol.23 No.8 ISSN 954-5891 Politics And Fantasy North An Bord Snip The Good Friday Agreement has led to the drastic decline of the two Northern Ireland The 'Special Group on Public Service parties which were central to its negotiation, the Ulster Unionist Party and the Social Numbers and Expenditure Programmes' Democratic and Labour Party. The essential futility of the structures put in place by the (aka An Bord Snip Nua), chaired by UCD GFA led to their displacement by the 'extremist' parties, the Democratic Unionist Party economist Colm McCarthy, has produced and Sinn Fein. These parties are now experiencing the futility of it. But there are no other its findings. As an accountant's report in parties. in the offing to displace them—except perhaps Jim Allister's movement of fulfilling the task set it—how to cut a few Unionist dissent, which may well appear as a party at the British Election next year and billion off the costs side of a balance sheet put the wind up the DUP and UUP. in a context where annual expenditure of There is a big difference between the DUP and Sinn Fein as 'extremists' relative to the ¤50bn compares with income of ¤30bn— GFA. The DUP rejected the Agreement, condemned the UUP for supporting it, it is an efficient, competent and thorough campaigned against it in referendums and elections, swore it would never sit in job.