DOCSLIB.ORG

An Bord Snip

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Bord Snip An Bord Snip: Cutting Childhood Short July 2009 The Children’s Rights Alliance is a coalition of over 90 non-governmental organisations (NGOs) working to secure the rights and needs of children in Ireland, by campaigning for the full implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. It aims to improve the lives of all children under 18, through securing the necessary changes in Ireland’s laws, policies and services. Membership The Alliance was formally established in March 1995. Many of its member organisations are prominent in the children’s sector – working directly with children on a daily basis across the country. The Alliance’s policies, projects and activities are developed through ongoing collaboration and consultation with its member organisations. Vision Ireland will be one of the best places in the world to be a child Mission To realise the rights of children in Ireland through securing the full implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child July 2009 ©2009 Children’s Rights Alliance – Republic of Ireland Limited The Children’s Rights Alliance is a registered charity – CHY No. 11541 This is an in-house publication For any enquiries or to obtain additional copies of this paper, please contact: Children’s Rights Alliance 4 Upper Mount Street Dublin 2 Tel: +353.1.662 9400 Fax: +353.1.662 9355 Email: [email protected] Web: www.childrensrights.ie The Alliance grants permission for the reproduction of quotations from this text, provided due acknowledgement of the source is made and provided such citations do not exceed 400 words in length. This publication may be reproduced in full or in part if accompanied by the following citation: An Bord Snip: Cutting Childhood Short, July 2009. Contents 1. OVERVIEW 2 1.1 Introduction 2 1.2 Overview Analysis 3 1.3 An Bord Snip Recommendations that Breach Towards 2016 7 2. ANALYSIS BY GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT 9 2.1 Department of Education and Science 9 2.2 Department of Health and Children 13 2.3 Health Service Executive 14 2.4 Department of Social and Family Affairs 15 2.5 Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform 16 2.6 Department of Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs 17 2.7 Department of Transport 18 2.8 Department of Arts, Sport and Tourism 18 3. APPENDICES 19 Appendix I: Direct Impact on Children 19 Appendix II: Indirect Significant Impact on Children 20 Appendix III: Alliance Member Organisations 21 Children’s Rights Alliance: An Bord Snip: Cutting Childhood Short, July 2009 1 1. OVERVIEW 1.1 Introduction The Report of the Special Group on Public Service Numbers and Expenditure Programmes dubbed ‘An Bord Snip Nua’ was published on 16 July 2009. 1 The Special Group sat for six months and was chaired by UCD Economist, Mr. Colm McCarthy. The Group’s mandate was to examine all current Exchequer spending across all Departments and agencies, to see where expenditure and staff savings might be made, in response to the current financial crisis. 2 The Group’s report identifies potential expenditure savings of €5.3 billion, with associated staff reductions of 17,300 in public service numbers.3 The highest staff reductions are in the Department of Education and Science (6,930) and in the Department of Health and Children (6,168).4 Over the coming months, the Government and the Dáil will deliberate on what actions should be taken to address the deficit in public finances — their decisions will be informed by the Group’s recommendations. The Minister for Finance has invited the views and input of all concerned, and referred the Group’s report to the Oireachtas Committee on Finance and General Affairs for discussion prior to the Budget in December. 5 Outline of this Paper Part 1 of this paper begins with a brief analysis of how the Group’s recommendations, if implemented, will impact on children and provides commentary on the key issues as identified by the Alliance. Part 2 contains a summary of the Group’s recommendations, by governmental department and agencies, which directly impact on children. Where relevant, the paper also draws attention to proposed cuts that, whilst not directly related to children, will have a significant impact on their lives and those of their families. There are three appendices, Appendix I ‘Direct Impact on Children’ and Appendix II ‘Indirect Significant Impact on Children’ contain a listing of the cuts outlined in Part 2 and their proposed savings set out in tabular format. Appendix III contains a list of Alliance member organisations. 1 The report of the Special Group was published in two volumes and can be accessed at http://sgps.gov.ie. For brevity, this paper refers to The Report of the Special Group on Public Service Numbers and Expenditure Programmes as ‘An Bord Snip’. 2 Press Statement (16 July 2009) Report of Special Group on Public Service Numbers and Expenditure Programmes, accessible at http://sgps.gov.ie 3 Ibid. 4 Report of the Special Group on Public Service Numbers and Expenditure Programmes, Volume I, p. 3. 5 Press Statement (16 July 2009) Report of Special Group on Public Service Numbers and Expenditure Programmes, accessible at http://sgps.gov.ie Children’s Rights Alliance: An Bord Snip: Cutting Childhood Short, July 2009 2 1.2 Overview Analysis The recommendations proposed by ‘An Bord Snip Nua’, if implemented, will cut childhoods short. An economic downturn is not an excuse to renege on our commitment to children’s rights. By ratifying the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child in 1992, Ireland committed to vindicate children’s civil, political, social, economic and cultural rights. In times of economic crisis, it is more important than ever that front- line services and supports for children and families be preserved. The President of Ireland Mary McAleese, addressing a Children’s Rights Alliance symposium in April 2009, spoke powerfully about the impact of the recession on children and childhood. She said: We know that in these difficult economic times, the environment is changing dramatically for children as financial pressure and job losses increase the anxiety levels in their homes. They are not immune. They are not hermetically sealed off from those anxieties. They need our reassurance now more than ever and they need space in which to express what it is they know and what it is we need to hear from them so that we can best protect and vindicate their rights, their childhoods. 6 An Bord Snip had a narrow brief and its report, therefore, presents an incomplete picture. It sets out a menu of proposal cuts to reduce current Exchequer spending. It is merely a desk based economic exercise. The Government’s decision making, however, must be informed by a broader perspective; it cannot be made in a vacuum. The human, social and economic fall-out of any proposed cut must be taken into account. The Government must assess the impact of each proposed cut on children, viewed through a medium and a long term lens, and take decisions that are in children’s best interests. Decisions must also reflect the reality on the ground for children. That reality includes 76,000 children living in consistent poverty, who must be protected from further impoverishment. 7 It includes one in three children in disadvantaged communities who leave school with literacy difficulties, who must be equipped with life’s most basic skills, those of reading and writing. 8 Income support and public services are critical supports for children to ensure that they reach their full potential. Decent schools, timely access to health and therapeutic services, and proper support for children with special needs are not dispensable for children; they are bread and butter issues. The devastating impact of cuts to children’s services can last a lifetime, they are not just a one-year budgetary saving. Skimp on education; skimp on a child’s wellbeing; and a generation will suffer the effects. Ireland has a duty to uphold children’s rights, and vindicating children’s rights – through the provision of essential services and supports – makes economic sense. Time and again studies have shown that investment early to support children saves expenditure in more intensive and costly state supports. Cuts now, particularly in education and health services, will prove a false economy in the medium to long term. It does not make economic sense to roll back on valuable progress. Furthermore, the Alliance cautions that children did not cause the economic crisis and should be spared the pain. The Alliance fully acknowledges that the country faces a very grave deficit in its public finances; and that the economic crisis presents difficult policy and budgetary choices. Furthermore, we acknowledge that our public services are in need of reform, and we welcome An Bord Snip’s positive recommendations to bring about reform and improve services. 6 Remarks by President McAleese at the Children's Rights Alliance Biennial Symposium, Dublin Castle, 2 April 2009 http://www.president.ie/index.php?section=5&speech=637&lang=eng Accessed 27 July 2009; and Children’s Rights Alliance, Are We There Yet? Are We There Yet? Are We There Yet?: Report of a Symposium on Children’s Rights in Ireland , prepared by Carmel Corrigan, p. 20. 7 This figure represents 7.4% of all children. See Central Statistics Office (2008), EU Survey on Income and Living Conditions (EU- SILC) 2007. 8 E. Eivers, G. Shiel and F. Shortt (2005), Literacy in Disadvantaged Primary Schools: Problems and Solutions, Dublin: Education Research Centre, p. 6. Children’s Rights Alliance: An Bord Snip: Cutting Childhood Short, July 2009 3 Proportion of the proposed savings that impact on children Overall An Bord Snip’s recommendations have a disproportionate impact on children.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Irish Business and Society: Governing, Participating and Transforming in the 21St Century
    Technological University Dublin ARROW@TU Dublin Books/Book Chapters School of Marketing 2011-1 Irish Business and Society: Governing, Participating and Transforming in the 21st Century John Hogan Technological University Dublin, [email protected] Paul Donnelly Technological University Dublin, [email protected] Brendan O'Rourke Technological University Dublin, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://arrow.tudublin.ie/buschmarbk Part of the Business Commons, Law Commons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Hogan, J., Donnelly, P., O’Rourke, B. (eds) (2010) Irish Business and Society: Governing, Participating and Transforming in the 21st Century. Dublin: Gill and Macmillan. This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Marketing at ARROW@TU Dublin. It has been accepted for inclusion in Books/Book Chapters by an authorized administrator of ARROW@TU Dublin. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 License Edited by John Hogan Paul F. Donnelly & Brendan K. O’Rourke Irish Business & Society Governing, Participating & Transforming in the 21st Century Irish Business and Society Governing, Participating and Transforming in the 21st Century Edited by JOHN HOGAN, PAUL F. DONNELLY AND BRENDAN K. O'ROURKE 'Irish Business and Societ), presents the best of Irish social science, neatly packaged around themes of governance, participation and transformation. Many of these original chapters are brilliantly crafted, and while they show an Ireland slipping off a time of rapid growth, themes of hope abound in enterprise, social and economic partnership, civil society, social inclusion and Europeanization.
    [Show full text]
  • A Very Political Project: Charles Haughey, Social Partnership and the Pursuit of an “Irish Economic Miracle”, 1969-92
    Dublin City University School of Law and Government A Very Political Project: Charles Haughey, Social Partnership and the pursuit of an “Irish economic miracle”, 1969-92 By Philip O’Connor Thesis completed under the supervision of Prof. Gary Murphy in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Dublin City University, School of Law and Government January 2020 Declaration I hereby certify that this material, which I now submit for assessment on the programme of study leading to the award of Doctor of Philosophy is entirely my own work, and that I have exercised reasonable care to ensure that the work is original, does not to the best of my knowledge breach any law of copyright, and has not been taken from the work of others save and to the extent that such work has been cited and acknowledged within the text of my work. Signed: ________________ (Candidate) DCU ID: 54160707 Date: 6th Jan. 2020 Table of Contents Table of Contents 3 Acknowledgements 6 Abstract 7 Introduction 8 Chapter 1: Theoretical contentions and competing literatures Contentions 14 The political economy of policy change 15 Policy and partnership in the economic transformation 19 Ireland’s social partnership in comparative analyses 22 Other literature 24 Part 1: Leaps, Bounds and Reversals, 1945-86 29 Chapter 2: The quest for socio-economic organisation, 1945-70 Irish politics and economic interests before 1945 30 Fits and starts: Irish “tripartitism” 1945-56 36 Lemass’s economic institutionalism 1957-63 40 System stresses: from expansion to dissolution
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict Resolution and Language Policy and Planning in the North of Ireland and Quebec / Canada
    Notes Introduction 1. The author has been Chief Executive of the Irish language non-governmental organisation POBAL since 1999. POBAL means ‘community’. 2. Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency, Northern Ireland Census 2001. 1 A Silent War: Conflict Resolution and Language Policy and Planning in the North of Ireland and Quebec / Canada 1. ‘The struggle for human rights is inevitably a struggle for power, and one that is generally tied to resources.’ Mary Robinson, Human Rights: A Global Perspective, UN Global Compact U.S. Network Meeting, ‘Business and Human Rights’ 28 April 2008, Harvard Business School. 2. Henry Patterson, Truth and Reconciliation in NI? Not much hope of either, Parliamentary Brief, 9 February 2009, http://www.parliamentarybrief.com/ articles/2/new/truth-and-969_67_0.html, downloaded on 18/02/2009. 3. http://daccessdds.un.org/doc/RESOLUTION/GEN/NR0/043/88/IMG/NR004388. pdf?OpenElement.downloaded 24/02/09. 4. Anonymous (1996, p. 258) Human Rights in Peace Negotiations, Human Rights Quarterly 18, pp. 249–258. 5. Henry Patterson, Truth and Reconciliation in NI? Not much hope of either, Parliamentary Brief, 9 February 2009, http://www.parliamentarybrief.com/ articles/2/new/truth-and-969_67_0.html, downloaded on 18/02/2009. 6. See for example Buchanan (1991, 1997a, 1997b), Cassese (1998), Copp (1997, 1999), Epseill (1980). 7. UN General Assembly Resolution 1514 (XV), http://daccessdds.un.org/ doc/RESOLUTION/GEN/NR0/152/88/IMG/NR015288.pdf?OpenElement, downloaded 01/03/09. 8. The term ‘nationalist’ in the context of the north’s political parties implies support for an all-Ireland political framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulation in Ireland: History, Structure, Style and Reform
    UCD GEARY INSTITUTE DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Regulation in Ireland: History, Structure, Style and Reform Ciara Brown and Colin Scott UCD Centre for Regulation and Governance [email protected] September 2010 This is the first working paper in a series within the Regulatory Capacity and Networked Governance Project, funded by the Irish Research Council for Humanities and Social Sciences and the Institute of Public Administration. A second paper is published under the title ‘Regulatory Capacity and Networked Governance’. We are grateful to project colleagues Niamh Hardiman, Muiris MacCarthaigh and Imelda Maher for their advice and support and to Richard Boyle of the IPA for comments on an earlier draft. 1. Introduction Regulation as an instrument of government has seen remarkable growth across European countries since the 1980s (Levi-Faur 2005). In this working paper we examine the development of regulation in Ireland and of developments in reform, reviewing such literature as is available. The working paper forms part of a larger project concerned with the investigation of regulatory capacity in Ireland. In this project we are examining how the use by government, agencies and others (such as self-regulatory bodies and EU institutions) of their capacities for regulation is shaped, not simply by instrument choice, but also by institutional factors, drawing on concepts of ‘national styles of regulation (Vogel, 1986). We have a particular interest in the ways in which participation in networks affects regulatory capacity. The theoretical framework for analysing the linkage between regulatory capacity networked governance is set out in the second project Working Paper, ‘Regulatory Capacity and Networked Governance’.
    [Show full text]
  • Clusters and Cluster Initiatives: the Role of Collaboration and Social Capital in Building a System of Innovation in Ireland
    CLUSTERS AND CLUSTER INITIATIVES: THE ROLE OF COLLABORATION AND SOCIAL CAPITAL IN BUILDING A SYSTEM OF INNOVATION IN IRELAND Patrick R. Ivory B.A. (Econ), M.Litt. University: Dublin City University Supervisors: Professor David Jacobson Dr. Siobhain McGovern School: Business January 2012 Submitted for the degree of PhD at Dublin City University I hereby certify that this material, which I now submit for assessment on the programme of study leading to the award of PhD is entirely my own work, that I have exercised reasonable care to ensure that the work is original, and does not to the best of my knowledge breach any law of copyright, and has not been taken from the work of others save and to the extent that such work has been cited and acknowledged within the text of my work. Signed: ____________ (Candidate) ID No.: 56121831 Date: January 2012 i Acknowledgements I wish to acknowledge the help of a number of people in the research conducted in this thesis. The generosity of the people involved in the different cluster initiatives who provided interviews for the thesis was greatly appreciated. A deeper understanding of how collaboration works would not have been possible without the input and insights of these people (too many to name) from industry, universities, government and state agencies. Thanks is also due to colleagues in my DCU Professional Doctorate Programme (PDP) ‗action set‘ Sinead Brennan, David Kenefick, Peter Robbins and Anthony Briody. I very much appreciated the support of my employers IBEC, Danny McCoy and Brendan Butler, in undertaking the thesis. I would also like to thank my good friend, and IBEC colleague, Tony Donohoe for proof reading the entire thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Irish Political Review, August 2009
    Bowen And Dillon Globalizers Wet Dream? People's Verdict Manus O'Riordan Philip O'Connor Labour Comment page 15 page 7 back page IRISH POLITICAL REVIEW August 2009 Vol.24, No.8 ISSN 0790-7672 and Northern Star incorporating Workers' Weekly Vol.23 No.8 ISSN 954-5891 Politics And Fantasy North An Bord Snip The Good Friday Agreement has led to the drastic decline of the two Northern Ireland The 'Special Group on Public Service parties which were central to its negotiation, the Ulster Unionist Party and the Social Numbers and Expenditure Programmes' Democratic and Labour Party. The essential futility of the structures put in place by the (aka An Bord Snip Nua), chaired by UCD GFA led to their displacement by the 'extremist' parties, the Democratic Unionist Party economist Colm McCarthy, has produced and Sinn Fein. These parties are now experiencing the futility of it. But there are no other its findings. As an accountant's report in parties. in the offing to displace them—except perhaps Jim Allister's movement of fulfilling the task set it—how to cut a few Unionist dissent, which may well appear as a party at the British Election next year and billion off the costs side of a balance sheet put the wind up the DUP and UUP. in a context where annual expenditure of There is a big difference between the DUP and Sinn Fein as 'extremists' relative to the ¤50bn compares with income of ¤30bn— GFA. The DUP rejected the Agreement, condemned the UUP for supporting it, it is an efficient, competent and thorough campaigned against it in referendums and elections, swore it would never sit in job.
    [Show full text]