Fencing Affects African Wild Dog Movement Patterns and Population Dynamics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fencing Affects African Wild Dog Movement Patterns and Population Dynamics Fencing affects African wild dog movement patterns and population dynamics H ELEN M. K. O’ N EILL,SARAH M. DURANT S TEFANIE S TREBEL and R OSIE W OODROFFE Abstract Wildlife fences are often considered an important Introduction tool in conservation. Fences are used in attempts to pre- vent human–wildlife conflict and reduce poaching, despite abitat fragmentation is a leading threat to global bio- known negative impacts on landscape connectivity and ani- Hdiversity (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, ). mal movement patterns. Such impacts are likely to be par- As habitats become increasingly fragmented, wildlife pop- ticularly important for wide-ranging species, such as the ulations also become fragmented in smaller, genetically African wild dog Lycaon pictus, which requires large areas isolated, subpopulations that will be at greater risk of of continuous habitat to fulfil its resource requirements. extinction (Lande, ). This is of particular concern for Laikipia County in northern Kenya is an important area wide-ranging species that are reliant on accessing large for wild dogs but new wildlife fences are increasingly areas to fulfil their resource requirements, meaning that being built in this ecosystem. Using a long-term dataset fragmentation can lead to such species being extirpated, from the area’s free-ranging wild dog population, we evalu- even when habitat may remain (Løvschal et al., ). Frag- ated the effect of wildlife fence structure on the ability of mentation often increases the cost incurred by wildlife wild dogs to cross them. The extent to which fences im- in obtaining vital resources and may even cut access off en- peded wild dog movement differed between fence designs, tirely (Epps et al., ; Løvschal et al., ). Fragmentation although individuals crossed fences of all types. Purpose- can occur as a result of habitat loss, but is also associated built fence gaps increased passage through relatively imper- with the erection of barriers to movement such as fences meable fences. Nevertheless, low fence permeability can lead (Clevenger & Waltho, ). to packs, or parts of packs, becoming trapped on the wrong Fences have been employed in attempts to mitigate – side of a fence, with consequences for population dynamics. numerous conservation issues, including human wildlife Careful evaluation should be given to the necessity of erect- conflict, invasive species control, prevention of disease ing fences; ecological impact assessments should incorpo- transmission and delineation of protected area bound- rate evaluation of impacts on animal movement patterns aries (Hayward & Kerley, ; Gadd, ; Hayward & and should be undertaken for all large-scale fencing inter- Somers, ; Beale et al., ). In some cases fences have ventions. Where fencing is unavoidable, projects should led to positive conservation outcomes such as reductions in – use the most permeable fencing structures possible, both human elephant conflict (Knickerbocker & Waithaka, ), in the design of the fence and including as many purpose- protection of threatened native species from invasive spe- built gaps as possible, to minimize impacts on wide-ranging cies in New Zealand (Burns et al., ), or, in the case of wildlife. the Critically Endangered hirola antelope Beatragus hunteri in Kenya, from native predators (Ali et al., ). However, Keywords African wild dog, connectivity, fence, Lycaon although fences can have positive impacts, the effects are pictus, movement ecology, wide-ranging often mixed. Building and maintaining fences is costly, Supplementary material for this article is available at and the associated habitat fragmentation can require the doi.org/./S use of expensive, complex conservation management strate- gies, including translocations, to maintain genetic diversity across metapopulations (Davies-Mostert et al., ; Buk et al., ). There are also reports of negative impacts, in- cluding mortalities, as a result of fencing preventing animals HELEN M. K. O’NEILL*† (Corresponding author, orcid.org/0000-0002-9458- from accessing vital resources, and of individuals becom- 4494), SARAH M. DURANT and ROSIE WOODROFFE Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London, UK. E-mail h.o’[email protected] ing entangled or being electrocuted by fences (Gadd, ; Pietersen et al., ). However, although there are multiple STEFANIE STREBEL Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland examples where fences have restricted the access of wild *Also at: Centre for Biodiversity and Environment Research, Division of animals to vital resources (Gadd, ), thereby negatively Biosciences, University College London, London, UK affecting populations, the impact of such barriers on the † Current address: Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, School of movements of individual animals is poorly understood. Anthropology and Conservation, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK Some fencing projects have sought to minimize harmful Received September . Revision requested November . Accepted April . effects by using fences with different levels of permeability, This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, Downloadeddistribution, from https://www.cambridge.org/core and reproduction in any medium,. IP address: provided 82.26.43.192 the original work, on 10 is properlyAug 2021 cited. at 14:35:52, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/termsOryx, Page 1 of 9 © The Author(s),. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605320000320 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605320000320 2H.M.K.O’Neill et al. which block the passage of certain key species but allow also presented, to provide context for the quantitative other species to cross. Semi-permeable fence structures may analyses. be high enough for species to pass below, or low enough for species to jump over, but act as barriers to the movement Study area of less agile species such as the elephant Loxodonta africana, the white rhinoceros Ceratotherium simum or the black The study area lies in Laikipia County in northern Kenya; a rhinoceros Diceros bicornis. Similarly, purpose-built gaps, wooded savannah landscape (mean annual rainfall mm; which permit the passage of some species but prevent the Woodroffe, ). Laikipia supports the second highest movement of others, are sometimes included in the structure density of large terrestrial mammalian wildlife in Kenya of a fence to increase permeability (Dupuis-Désormeaux et al., (Kinnaird & O’Brien, ) and is an important area for a). These gaps may allow animals to pass through the many threatened species. fence, but if there are few gaps then animals may have The landscape is divided into privately and community to move a considerable additional distance to use them. owned properties of , – km , with land uses including Fence gaps may also have impacts on the movement of traditional pastoralism, commercial livestock ranching, sub- wildlife species as they are likely to funnel them into sistence agriculture, large-scale farming, and tourism (Ulrich certain areas (Little et al., ), thereby affecting species’ et al., ). The amount of wildlife fencing in Laikipia has distributions across a landscape (Dupuis-Desormeaux et al., increased since . Many of the properties in Laikipia are b). fenced to demarcate their boundaries (Evans & Adams, ; The African wild dog Lycaon pictus is an extremely Yurco, ); fencing is also used in an attempt to reduce wide-ranging species (Woodroffe, ), categorized on human–wildlife conflict and to reduce rhinoceros poaching the IUCN Red List as Endangered (Woodroffe & Sillero- by containing animals within protected reserves (Dupuis- Zubiri, ). The species is threatened by habitat loss and Désormeaux et al., a; Blair & Meredith, ). fragmentation; it is estimated to have been extirpated from We focused on the effects of the fences of two of the largest up to % of its former range (IUCN/SSC, , , ). wildlife properties in Laikipia, referred to here as Property A and Wild dogs need access to large, continuous areas of wildlife- Property B. These properties are used by wild dog packs (Sup- friendly habitat to persist; increases in fencing would be plementary Fig. ) and employ three types of fencing (Fig. ). expected to affect wild dogs negatively because they will Property A comprises two sections. The property’sranch- fragment the landscape and confine packs to smaller areas. ing and tourism businesses are based in the western part In South Africa, where wild dogs live in fenced reserves, the (hereafter Property A), which supports a wide variety of metapopulation has to be actively managed using trans- wildlife. Property A ( km ) is fenced with a low-level, locations and reintroductions (Davies-Mostert et al., ), electrified Type A fence, which is raised from the ground although some positive impacts of fencing have been (Fig. a). The fence is . km long and intended to restrict found within this metapopulation as individuals have been the movement of elephants and rhinoceroses. This fence has shown to suffer lower mortality when released with an five purpose-built gaps (Fig. d, Supplementary Figs & ) established social group into securely fenced reserves (Gusset that allow the passage of most wildlife species but prevent et al., , ). Wild dogs have also
Recommended publications
  • The Ancients' One-Horned
    The Ancients’ One-Horned Ass: Accuracy and Consistency Chris Lavers HIS PAPER explores ancient Greek and Roman accounts of the one-horned ass.1 These narratives have been studied extensively by literary scholars and historians but have Tbeen largely ignored by zoologists and geographers. When the zoological and geographical underpinnings of the accounts are examined, however, it becomes apparent that these ancient writers may have had a more definite notion of the region about which they wrote than hitherto has been assumed. The animals contributing to the descriptions of the one-horned ass by Ctesias, Pliny, and Aelian can be found in the highlands of Central Asia. Indeed, Central Asia appears to be the only place on the Earth’s surface that could have given rise to the corpus of ancient accounts of the unicorned ass and the animals that shared its landscape. 1. Introduction Ctesias of Cnidus was a Greek physician who spent seventeen years ministering at the court of the King of Persia. In 398 B.C. he returned to Greece and began two reference works, a history of Persia in twenty-three volumes, now mostly lost, and Indica, a treatise on the region probably roughly coincident with 1 It will quickly become apparent to regular readers of this journal that the author is not a classicist. I am greatly indebted to Kent Rigsby, the editorial board of GRBS, and an anonymous reviewer for considering a manuscript from a zoologist, and for their kind assistance in turning a clumsy initial submission into the present, less clumsy version. All opinions and errors are mine.
    [Show full text]
  • An Act Prohibiting the Import, Sale and Possession of African Elephants, Lions, Leopards, Black Rhinoceros, White Rhinoceros and Giraffes
    Substitute Senate Bill No. 925 Public Act No. 21-52 AN ACT PROHIBITING THE IMPORT, SALE AND POSSESSION OF AFRICAN ELEPHANTS, LIONS, LEOPARDS, BLACK RHINOCEROS, WHITE RHINOCEROS AND GIRAFFES. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Assembly convened: Section 1. (NEW) (Effective October 1, 2021) (a) For purposes of this section, "big six African species" means any specimen of any of the following members of the animal kingdom: African elephant (loxodonta africana), African lion (panthera leo), African leopard (panthera pardus pardus), black rhinoceros (diceros bicornis), white rhinoceros (ceratotherium simum cottoni) and African giraffe (giraffa camelopardalis), including any part, product or offspring thereof, or the dead body or parts thereof, except fossils, whether or not it is included in a manufactured product or in a food product. (b) No person shall import, possess, sell, offer for sale or transport in this state any big six African species. (c) Any law enforcement officer shall have authority to enforce the provisions of this section and, whenever necessary, to execute any warrant to search for and seize any big six African species imported, possessed, sold, offered for sale or transported in violation of this section. Substitute Senate Bill No. 925 (d) The provisions of subsection (b) of this section shall not apply if the possession of such specimen of a big six African species is expressly authorized by any federal law or permit, or if any of the following conditions exist that are not otherwise prohibited
    [Show full text]
  • Greater One-Horned Rhinoceros Or Indian Rhino
    GREATER ONE-HORNED RHINO Perissodactyla Family: Rhinocerotidae Genus: Rhinoceros Species: unicornis Range: Nepal and Northeastern India (Assam). Limited to 10 sites in India and 2 in Nepal Habitat: floodplains of large rivers, swampy and tall grass areas, reed beds, grasslands and wooded meadows Niche: crepuscular terrestrial herbivore Wild diet: grass, fruit, leaves, branches of trees and shrubs, and cultivated crops. Zoo diet: horse chow, alfalfa, oats, hay, fruits, vegetables, acacia Life Span: (Wild) 35-40 years (Captivity) 47 years Sexual dimorphism: male is larger Location in SF Zoo: Lion Fountain Trail in pachyderm building APPEARANCE & PHYSICAL ADAPTATIONS: The greater-one horned rhinoceros or Indian rhino is the largest Asian rhino, and is characterized by skin folds that resemble armor plating with wart-like bumps that cover the shoulder and upper leg region. They have a single blunt, somewhat stubby horn that sits on a bony knob and is composed of hardened, compressed keratin (hair-like) fibers. Weight: M 4,800 lbs. F 3,500 lb Indian rhinos have a prehensile (grasping) upper lip that is flexible and Length: 7-14 ft is used to grasp bunches of grass in a browsing motion or can be SH: M 5.9' / F5.2' tucked out of the way for grazing short grasses. Their excellent sense TL: 28 in. of smell and hearing gives rhinos information about their surroundings and help them detect danger. Rhinos have poor vision, and are extremely near-sighted, making them very dangerous and unpredictable and likely to charge unfamiliar sounds and smells. Like horses, rhinos run and walk on their toes, and can run a surprising 28 to 35 miles per hour for short distances.
    [Show full text]
  • La Brea and Beyond: the Paleontology of Asphalt-Preserved Biotas
    La Brea and Beyond: The Paleontology of Asphalt-Preserved Biotas Edited by John M. Harris Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Science Series 42 September 15, 2015 Cover Illustration: Pit 91 in 1915 An asphaltic bone mass in Pit 91 was discovered and exposed by the Los Angeles County Museum of History, Science and Art in the summer of 1915. The Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History resumed excavation at this site in 1969. Retrieval of the “microfossils” from the asphaltic matrix has yielded a wealth of insect, mollusk, and plant remains, more than doubling the number of species recovered by earlier excavations. Today, the current excavation site is 900 square feet in extent, yielding fossils that range in age from about 15,000 to about 42,000 radiocarbon years. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Archives, RLB 347. LA BREA AND BEYOND: THE PALEONTOLOGY OF ASPHALT-PRESERVED BIOTAS Edited By John M. Harris NO. 42 SCIENCE SERIES NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS COMMITTEE Luis M. Chiappe, Vice President for Research and Collections John M. Harris, Committee Chairman Joel W. Martin Gregory Pauly Christine Thacker Xiaoming Wang K. Victoria Brown, Managing Editor Go Online to www.nhm.org/scholarlypublications for open access to volumes of Science Series and Contributions in Science. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Los Angeles, California 90007 ISSN 1-891276-27-1 Published on September 15, 2015 Printed at Allen Press, Inc., Lawrence, Kansas PREFACE Rancho La Brea was a Mexican land grant Basin during the Late Pleistocene—sagebrush located to the west of El Pueblo de Nuestra scrub dotted with groves of oak and juniper with Sen˜ora la Reina de los A´ ngeles del Rı´ode riparian woodland along the major stream courses Porciu´ncula, now better known as downtown and with chaparral vegetation on the surrounding Los Angeles.
    [Show full text]
  • 9 CFR Ch. I (1–1–12 Edition) § 93.803
    § 93.803 9 CFR Ch. I (1–1–12 Edition) elephant, hippopotamus, rhinoceros, or used must be adequate to kill the types tapir, the animal may be imported only of ectoparasites likely to infest the if all applicable requirements of this animal to be imported; a list of rec- part are met. ommended pesticides and concentra- [52 FR 29502, Aug. 10, 1987, as amended at 57 tions may be obtained from the Animal FR 23049, June 1, 1992; 59 FR 67615, Dec. 30, and Plant Health Inspection Service, 1994. Redesignated at 62 FR 56012, Oct. 28, Veterinary Services, National Center 1997] for Import-Export, 4700 River Road Unit 38, Riverdale, Maryland 20737–1231; § 93.803 Health certificate. and (a) An elephant, hippopotamus, rhi- (5) The name and address of the con- noceros, or tapir shall not be imported signor and consignee. into the United States unless accom- panied by a health certificate either [52 FR 29502, Aug. 10, 1987; 52 FR 35350, Sept. signed by a salaried veterinarian of the 18, 1987, as amended at 57 FR 23049, June 1, national veterinary services of the re- 1992; 59 FR 67615, Dec. 30, 1994. Redesignated and amended at 62 FR 56012, 56021, Oct. 28, gion where the inspection and treat- 1997] ment required by this section occurred or signed by a veterinarian authorized § 93.804 Declaration upon arrival. by the national veterinary services of such region and endorsed by a salaried Upon arrival of an elephant, hippo- veterinarian of the national veterinary potamus, rhinoceros, or tapir at a port services of such region (the endorse- of entry, the
    [Show full text]
  • Tapir Tracks Dear Educator
    TAPIR TRACKS A Curriculum Guide for Educators 2 Tapir Tracks Dear Educator, Welcome to Tapir Tracks! This curriculum was created for classroom teachers and educators at zoos and other nonformal science learning centers to enable you and your students to discover tapirs of the Americas and Asia. Because tapirs spread seeds from the fruits they eat, these little-known mammals are essential to the health of the forests they inhabit. However, tapir populations are rapidly declining. Loss of their habitat and hunting threaten tapir survival. An international team of scientists and conservationists works to study wild tapirs, manage the zoo-based population, protect habitat, and educate local communities. We collaborate through the Tapir Specialist Group, of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Species Survival Commission. This packet includes background information along with lesson plans and activities that can easily be adapted for kindergarten, elementary and secondary school students (grades K-12). An online link is included for you to download images and videos to use in your teaching: http://tapirs.org/resources/educator-resources. This toolkit is designed to enable you to meet curriculum requirements in multiple subjects. Students can explore the world’s tapirs through science, environmental studies, technology, social studies, geography, the arts and creative writing activities. We hope that by discovering tapirs through these lessons and engaging activities that students will care and take action to protect tapirs
    [Show full text]
  • Bill Analysis for File Copy
    OLR Bill Analysis sSB 925 AN ACT PROHIBITING THE IMPORT, SALE AND POSSESSION OF AFRICAN ELEPHANTS, LIONS, LEOPARDS, BLACK RHINOCEROS, WHITE RHINOCEROS AND GIRAFFES. SUMMARY This bill generally bans importing, possessing, selling, offering for sale, or transporting in Connecticut a specimen (dead or alive) of any of six types of African animals, which the bill collectively refers to as the “big six African species.” It applies to certain elephants, lions, leopards, giraffes, and two rhinoceros species. The bill establishes a graduated penalty structure for violations, ranging from no penalty for someone who, unaware and in good faith, violates the ban, to a class D felony for someone with at least two prior violations subject to penalty. In all cases, the bill requires seizing the specimen and any other property or item used in connection with the violation. The specimen, property, or item is then forfeited and, unless the specimen is alive, destroyed. The bill contains several exemptions, including for a specimen that is already legally in the state or distributed to a beneficiary or heir, as long as the owner or distributee timely obtains a certificate of possession from the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP). The ban also does not apply to fossils and ivory and the following under certain conditions: circuses; museums; zoological institutions; and motion picture, television, or digital media production companies. Lastly, the bill specifies that the ban does not prohibit transporting through the state endangered or threatened species subject to the terms of another state’s permit, which existing law allows. The United States regulates the trade of the species covered by the Researcher: KLM Page 1 5/8/21 2021SB-00925-R010637-BA.DOCX bill, except the African giraffe, through the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) and laws such as the Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • (EHV-1 and EHV-9): Genetic Diversity, Latency and Co-Infections
    viruses Article Zebra Alphaherpesviruses (EHV-1 and EHV-9): Genetic Diversity, Latency and Co-Infections Azza Abdelgawad 1, Armando Damiani 2, Simon Y. W. Ho 3, Günter Strauss 4, Claudia A. Szentiks 1, Marion L. East 1, Nikolaus Osterrieder 2 and Alex D. Greenwood 1,5,* 1 Leibniz-Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Alfred-Kowalke-Strasse 17, Berlin 10315, Germany; [email protected] (A.A.); [email protected] (C.A.S.); [email protected] (M.L.E.) 2 Institut für Virologie, Freie Universität Berlin, Robert-von-Ostertag-Str. 7-13, Berlin 14163, Germany; [email protected] (A.D.); [email protected] (N.O.) 3 School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; [email protected] 4 Tierpark Berlin-Friedrichsfelde, Am Tierpark 125, Berlin 10307, Germany; [email protected] 5 Department of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Oertzenweg 19, Berlin 14163, Germany * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-30-516-8255 Academic Editor: Joanna Parish Received: 21 July 2016; Accepted: 14 September 2016; Published: 20 September 2016 Abstract: Alphaherpesviruses are highly prevalent in equine populations and co-infections with more than one of these viruses’ strains frequently diagnosed. Lytic replication and latency with subsequent reactivation, along with new episodes of disease, can be influenced by genetic diversity generated by spontaneous mutation and recombination. Latency enhances virus survival by providing an epidemiological strategy for long-term maintenance of divergent strains in animal populations. The alphaherpesviruses equine herpesvirus 1 (EHV-1) and 9 (EHV-9) have recently been shown to cross species barriers, including a recombinant EHV-1 observed in fatal infections of a polar bear and Asian rhinoceros.
    [Show full text]
  • Giraffe Rhinoceros Elephant Orangutan Sea Turtle Snow Leopard Gorilla
    Monday Spelling This week you will be practising the spelling of different endangered animals. giraffe rhinoceros When you are practising these words, use the strategies that you have learnt in class: elephant orangutan Read the words sea turtle snow leopard Identify the tricky part Practising in different ways (e.g. rain- bow writing; capital letters, pyramid gorilla pangolin words; look, say, cover, write, check). Task 1 Carefully write the spelling of each animal under its picture. Monday continued Handwriting Task 2 Write a simple fact about each of the animals you are learning for your spellings using your neatest, joined handwriting. The sentences do not need to be long - concentrate on your presentation and using the correct spelling. For example: Elephants have a long trunk. Pangolins are scaly. Snow leopards are fluffy. Tuesday Reading: note-taking Note-taking is an extremely important skill to learn. When you take notes, you do not copy down every piece of information. Instead, you record the most important facts which are the bits you don’t want to forget. For example: Below is an extract taken from a website about tigers: Tiger Tigers can reach a length of up to 11 feet (3.3 metres) and weigh as much as 720 pounds (330 kilograms). That’s heavier than a piano. Have you ever tried to lift a piano? Don’t do it alone as you’ll probably hurt yourself. That is one heavy cat. Imagine your cat at home being as big as that, there would be no space for them! To take notes on this piece of text, we need to work out what the most important bits of information are.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sumatran Rhinoceros (Dicerorhinus Sumatrensis) Robin W
    Intensive Management and Preventative Medicine Protocol for the Sumatran Rhinoceros (Dicerorhinus sumatrensis) Robin W. Radcliffe, DVM, DACZM Scott B. Citino, DVM, DACZM Ellen S. Dierenfeld, MS, PhD Thornas J. Foose, MS, PhD l Donald E. Paglia, MD John S. Romo History and ~ack~iound The Sumatran rhinoceros (~icerorhinussumatrensis) is a highly endangered browsing rhinoceros that inhabits the forested regions of Indonesia and Malaysia. The Sumatran is considered a primitive rhinoceros with a characteristic coat of hair; it is closely related to the woolly rhinoceros (Coelodonfa antiquitatis), a species once abundant throughout Asia during the Pleistocene era. In Malaysia, the Sumatran rhino is known locally as badak Kerbau while in Indonesia the local name is badak Sumatera. Today the Sumatran rhinoceros is considered one of the most7endangered large mammals on earth with an estimated 300 animals remaining. Poaching for the animal's horrhas resulted in their decline with habitat loss a secondary factor contributing to population reduction and isolation. Attempts at captive propagation of the Sumatran rhmoceros have been problematic due to sigruhcant health problems and an inability to provide. appropriate captive nutritional and husbandry requirements needed to meet the demands of these highly specialized browsers. This Preventative Medicine Protocol is designed to provide a basis upon which more natural captive propagation efforts for this species can proceed by providing a tool for monitoring health. Goals of Preven tative Medicine Protocol The goals of the preventative medicine protocol are to provide a comprehensive monitoring program to assist in preventing disease and making appropriate decisions regarding health of captive animals. This protocol can be broken down into four main areas: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Animals Saved from the Flood by Noah. Detail from a Painting by Roeland Savery
    THE STORY OF MAN'S DISCOVERY OF THE ANIMAL KINGDOM Translated from the German by MICHAEL BULLOCK Illustrated with photographs and line drawings The animals saved from the Flood by Noah. Detail from a painting by Roeland Savery. HOUGHTON MIFFLIN COMPANY BOSTON 1 959 34 A CABINET OF MONSTERS MONOCEROS AND RHINOCEROS 35 in a thoroughly practical way. He had an elephant station set up earlier versions by the Latin word unicornis or the Greek monoceros near Api in the Congo-the first of its kind on African soil since --both meaning one-horn. It is clear, at any rate, that there once the days of Ptolemy Philadelphus. The experiment succeeded, al­ existed in the East a powerful beast which n1en caught, tied to the though Kornaks brought from India could not cope with the crib, put in harness and set to work in the fields. The taming of forest elephants of the Congo. Native Zanga negroes, on the this beast seemed to the men of those days a great and wonderful other hand, managed very well. After the closing of Api a new event, an epoch-making feat that could not have been accom­ station was established at Gangala-na-Bodio on the upper Wele. plished without the grace of God. Here the tame elephants of the colonial government still perform This unicorn was already a legendary creature in the ancient valuable services as draught animals and beasts of burden in all world. In the Middle Ages it developed into a mythical super­ sorts of forestry work, in spite of the introduction of lorries and beast, the nature of which Leonardo da Vinci outlined in the tractors.
    [Show full text]
  • EAZA Best Practice Guidelines for the White Rhinoceros EAZA Best Practice Guidelines for The
    2018 EAZA Best Practice Guidelines for the white EAZA rhinocerosBest Practice Guidelines for the white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium Simum) First Edition, July 2018 | Lars Versteege1 EAZA Best Practice Guidelines for the white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum) Editor: Lars Versteege Contact information: Safaripark Beekse Bergen, Beekse Bergen 31, 5081 NJ Hilvarenbeek, The Netherlands Email: [email protected] Name of TAG: Rhino TAG TAG Chair: Friederike von Houwald (Zoo Basel, Switzerland) Edition: 1 July 2018 2 EAZA Best Practice Guidelines Disclaimer Copyright (March 2018) by EAZA Executive Office, Amsterdam. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in hard copy, machine-readable or other forms without advance written permission from the European Association of Zoos and Aquaria (EAZA). Members of the EAZA may copy this information for their own use as needed. The information contained in these EAZA Best Practice Guidelines has been obtained from numerous sources believed to be reliable. EAZA and the EAZA Felid TAG make a diligent effort to provide a complete and accurate representation of the data in its reports, publications and services. However, EAZA does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy or completeness of any information. EAZA disclaims all liability for errors or omissions that may exist and shall not be liable for any incidental, consequential or other damages (whether resulting from negligence or otherwise) including, without limitation, exemplary damages or lost profits arising out of or in connection with the use of this publication. Because the technical information provided in the EAZA Best Practice Guidelines can easily be misread or misinterpreted unless properly analyzed, EAZA strongly recommends that users of this information consult with the editors in all matters related to data analysis and interpretation.
    [Show full text]