DOCSLIB.ORG

People in Jail and Prison in 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
People in Jail and Prison in 2020 People in Jail and Prison in 2020 Jacob Kang-Brown, Chase Montagnet, and Jasmine Heiss January 2021 Summary The United States saw an unprecedented drop in total Figure 1 incarceration between 2019 and 2020. Triggered by the The number of people incarcerated in jails and onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and pressure from prisons from 1980 to late 2020 advocates to reduce incarceration, local jails drove the 2,500,000 initial decline, although prisons also made reductions. From summer to fall 2020, prison populations declined 2,000,000 further, but jails began to refill, showing the fragility of Total Incarceration decarceration. Jails in rural counties saw the biggest initial 1,500,000 drops, but still incarcerate people at double the rate of urban and suburban areas. Despite the historic drop in the State & Federal 1,000,000 Prisons number of people incarcerated, the decrease was neither substantial nor sustained enough to be considered an 500,000 adequate response to the COVID-19 pandemic, and Local Jails incarceration in the United States remains a global aberration. 0 Vera Institute of Justice (Vera) researchers collected 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 data on the number of people in local jails and state and The number of people incarcerated in state and federal federal prisons at both midyear and fall 2020 to provide prisons and local jails in the United States dropped from timely information on how incarceration is changing in the around 2.1 million in 2019 to 1.8 million by mid-2020—a 1 United States during the COVID-19 pandemic. Vera 14 percent decrease. This decline held through the fall. This researchers estimated the national jail population using a represents a 21 percent decline from a peak of 2.3 million sample of 1,558 jail jurisdictions and the national prison people in prison and jail in 2008. State and federal prisons population based on a sample of 49 states and the Federal held an estimated 1,311,100 people at midyear 2020—down Bureau of Prisons. Vera also collected data on people 124,400, or 9 percent, from 2019. Prisons declined by an incarcerated and detained by the U.S. Marshals Service additional 61,800 people in late 2020, bringing the total (USMS) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). prison population to 1,249,300 people, a 13 percent decline Both ICE and USMS house people in jails and prisons from 2019 to late 2020 (the end of September or beginning Generally, jails and prisons do not make race and of October). (See Methodology on page 10 for details of the gender data available. However, preliminary results from statistical analyses.) other studies suggest that race inequity in incarceration may be worsening during the pandemic.2 Table 1 Summary of incarcerated populations and changes by region Population Midyear Between 2019 & 2020 Late Since midyear 2020 2019 2020 Change % change 2020 Change % change Total 2,115,000 1,818,700 -296,300 -14 1,814,800 -3,900 0 U.S. Prisons 1,435,500 1,311,100 -124,400 -9 1,249,300 -61,800 -5 U.S. Jails 758,419 575,500 -182,919 -24 633,200 57,700 10 Urban 166,979 127,800 -39,179 -23 141,200 13,400 10 Suburban 146,976 117,000 -29,976 -20 125,800 8,800 8 Small/Midsize metro 260,169 206,800 -53,369 -21 231,700 24,900 12 Rural 184,295 123,900 -60,395 -33 134,500 10,600 9 Local jails had steeper population declines than declines were in rural areas, where the jail population prisons in the first part of 2020. From June 2019 to June dropped by 60,400 (33 percent) between midyear 2019 2020, the jail population decreased by 182,900 people, or and midyear 2020, and subsequently grew by 10,600 (9 24 percent.3 However, from June to September, jail percent) between midyear 2020 and late 2020. Urban populations increased substantially, growing 10 percent areas and small and midsized metro areas had smaller in just three months. By late 2020, there were 633,200 incarceration declines followed by slightly higher people in local jails, up from an estimated 575,500 people subsequent growth from June to September 2020. Even at midyear. (See Figure 1, above.) In total, the national jail with dramatic declines, rural areas still have the highest population declined 17 percent from midyear 2019 to late incarceration rates by far. Three out of five people 2020, with jail incarceration trending upward in recent incarcerated in local jails are in smaller cities and rural months. communities. (See Table 1 above for a summary of jail The national jail population counts hide stark incarceration population counts and percent changes by divergence across the urban-to-rural continuum. In the geographic type, and Table 2, below for summary past year, the largest and most sustained jail population incarceration rate information.) Table 2 Summary of incarceration rates and changes by region Rates per 100,000 Residents Midyear Between 2019 & 2020 Late Since midyear 2020 2019 2020 Change % change 2020 Change % change Total 644 551 -93 -14 549 -2 0 U.S. Prisons 437 397 -40 -9 378 -19 -5 U.S. Jails 237 179 -58 -24 197 18 10 Urban 168 128 -40 -24 141 13 10 Suburban 181 143 -38 -21 154 11 7 Small/Midsize metro 276 218 -58 -21 244 26 12 Rural 410 274 -136 -33 297 23 8 Table 1 and 2 note: Total incarceration numbers are adjusted downward slightly to avoid double counting people held in local jails under contract for state prisons. See methodology on page 10. Figure 1 source note: The 2019 and 2020 jail and prison population estimates are based on data collected by Vera, while 1983 through 2018 estimates are from the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) Census of Jails, Annual Survey of Jails, and National Prisoner Statistics. See generally BJS, “Data Collection: Census of Jails Program,” https://perma.cc/P992-8N2G; BJS, “Data Collection: Annual Survey of Jails (ASJ) Program,” https://perma.cc/N5UQ-DSQQ; and BJS, “Data Collection: National Prisoner Statistics (NPS) Program,” https://perma.cc/4JJU-KLFC. The 1980 jail estimates are from the U.S. Census, see Margaret Cahalan, Historical Corrections Statistics in the United States, 1850-1984 (Washington, DC: BJS, 1986), https://perma.cc/WDP7-35AA. outbreaks in jails and prisons.6 Advocates called for Introduction releases from jails and prisons as a public health and racial justice measure.7 But no level of government took The COVID-19 pandemic transformed daily life in the adequate mitigation measures, if they made any effort at United States and brought the dehumanizing and life- all. Many correctional officers, apparently fearing for shortening nature of incarceration further into the light. their health, left their jobs to return to the safety of their Jails and prisons have been, and continue to be, homes; for example, after large outbreaks, around one- devastated by a virus that spreads in close quarters. Many third of the jobs are vacant at Arkansas’s two largest of the largest outbreaks of COVID-19 have been tied to prisons.8 Incarcerated people, by definition, do not have prisons and large jails: 3,336 cases at a crowded state this freedom to protect themselves, although some took prison in California’s Central Valley, and 3,216 cases at matters into their own hands. As one man who escaped a the county jail in Houston, Texas.4 Smaller facilities have federal prison told reporters, “I signed up for a jail had bad outbreaks too: 229 cases at a jail meant to hold sentence, not a death sentence.”9 365 people in Cascade County, Montana—the first New data collected by Vera and detailed in this outbreak in the region.5 In March 2020, scientists and report reveals that as the year wore on, the United States experts sounded the alarm about the risk of COVID-19 saw an unprecedented drop in total incarceration. The 2 historic changes in prison and jail populations triggered and the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP). Vera also by the COVID-19 pandemic came during a national wave collected data on immigrants detained by Immigration of Black Lives Matter demonstrations and accompanying and Customs Enforcement (ICE) who were held in local demands to change the criminal legal system in the jails, private prisons, and dedicated immigration United States.10 As a result, there was far more pressure detention facilities.16 on officials to release people from prison and jail in 2020 Vera’s national prison statistics are estimates based than in prior years. Local jails drove the initial decline, on data from 49 states and the BOP, which together held although prisons also made modest reductions. From 97 percent of the people incarcerated in prison in 2019 summer to fall 2020, prison populations declined further, (jurisdictional data from Virginia was not available). Jail but jails began to refill, showing the fragility of statistics are derived from a sample of about 1,600 jails. population reductions. Jails in rural counties saw the These include all county jails in 13 states and a sample of biggest initial drops, but still incarcerate people at double jails in other states. Vera researchers used these counts to the rate of urban and suburban areas. Despite the historic estimate the national total. The jails in Vera’s sample held drop in the number of people incarcerated, the United almost three out of every four people incarcerated in jails States still incarcerates a large share of its population. in 2013, the last time the BJS reported information for all The decrease was neither substantial nor sustained jails in the United States.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Death Penalty Prison Cells
    Death Penalty Prison Cells Which Benton plagiarise so contrapuntally that Rodrique velarized her self-abandonment? Inflamed and razed finedHaven when heel brandersalmost unbrokenly, some sheets though very Gerritwilfully unbinding and motherly? his spoon incarnate. Is Aylmer always historical and The death row made for prison cells even understand that my mother Deposited by friendsfamily andor money earned by working until the prison. A superior Before Dying Solitary Confinement on these Row. Death row Definition of Death tax at Dictionarycom. Lifers would no longer sent a cell which take their space in and already crowded jail. Willie Francis Wikipedia. The strict penalty Emotion numbers and turnover law divide The. The Management of Death-Sentenced Inmates Missouri. Wyoming Frontier Prison Rawlins Picture include row a Check out Tripadvisor members' 113 candid photos and videos of Wyoming Frontier Prison. Walking death camp at San Quentin State Prison KALW. Death row prisoners live in the barren cells Open bars. Living conditions on death during World Coalition Against the. The 156 death row inmates in Pennsylvania state prisons go just sleep every bullet the same note they wake up in an by-12 local cell illuminated. The one woman under a death midwife is incarcerated at an Atlanta prison manual any loose-row cell i look through bars at any chain-link came about 12 feet. In GHANA prison Services officials reported that cold one coil in Ghana 104 death row prisoners were held provide a cell designed to defend only 24 prisoners9 2 Death. Be found few single cells at the Holman Correctional Facility in Atmore Escambia County.
    [Show full text]
  • Prison Abolition and Grounded Justice
    Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2015 Prison Abolition and Grounded Justice Allegra M. McLeod Georgetown University Law Center, [email protected] This paper can be downloaded free of charge from: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/1490 http://ssrn.com/abstract=2625217 62 UCLA L. Rev. 1156-1239 (2015) This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance Commons Prison Abolition and Grounded Justice Allegra M. McLeod EVIEW R ABSTRACT This Article introduces to legal scholarship the first sustained discussion of prison LA LAW LA LAW C abolition and what I will call a “prison abolitionist ethic.” Prisons and punitive policing U produce tremendous brutality, violence, racial stratification, ideological rigidity, despair, and waste. Meanwhile, incarceration and prison-backed policing neither redress nor repair the very sorts of harms they are supposed to address—interpersonal violence, addiction, mental illness, and sexual abuse, among others. Yet despite persistent and increasing recognition of the deep problems that attend U.S. incarceration and prison- backed policing, criminal law scholarship has largely failed to consider how the goals of criminal law—principally deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation, and retributive justice—might be pursued by means entirely apart from criminal law enforcement. Abandoning prison-backed punishment and punitive policing remains generally unfathomable. This Article argues that the general reluctance to engage seriously an abolitionist framework represents a failure of moral, legal, and political imagination.
    [Show full text]
  • Prisoner Testimonies of Torture in United States Prisons and Jails
    Survivors Speak Prisoner Testimonies of Torture in United States Prisons and Jails A Shadow Report Submitted for the November 2014 Review of the United States by the Committee Against Torture I. Reporting organization The American Friends Service Committee (AFSC) is a Quaker faith based organization that promotes lasting peace with justice, as a practical expression of faith in action. AFSC’s interest in prison reform is strongly influenced by Quaker (Religious Society of Friends) activism addressing prison conditions as informed by the imprisonment of Friends for their beliefs and actions in the 17th and 18th centuries. For over three decades AFSC has spoken out on behalf of prisoners, whose voices are all too frequently silenced. We have received thousands of calls and letters of testimony of an increasingly disturbing nature from prisoners and their families about conditions in prison that fail to honor the Light in each of us. Drawing on continuing spiritual insights and working with people of many backgrounds, we nurture the seeds of change and respect for human life that transform social relations and systems. AFSC works to end mass incarceration, improve conditions for people who are in prison, stop prison privatization, and promote a reconciliation and healing approach to criminal justice issues. Contact Person: Lia Lindsey, Esq. 1822 R St NW; Washington, DC 20009; USA Email: [email protected] +1-202-483-3341 x108 Website: www.afsc.org Acknowledgements This report would not have been possible but for the courageous individuals held in U.S. prisons and jails who rise above the specter of reprisal for sharing testimonies of the abuses they endure.
    [Show full text]
  • Slavery by Another Name History Background
    Slavery by Another Name History Background By Nancy O’Brien Wagner, Bluestem Heritage Group Introduction For more than seventy-five years after the Emancipation Proclamation and the end of the Civil War, thousands of blacks were systematically forced to work against their will. While the methods of forced labor took on many forms over those eight decades — peonage, sharecropping, convict leasing, and chain gangs — the end result was a system that deprived thousands of citizens of their happiness, health, and liberty, and sometimes even their lives. Though forced labor occurred across the nation, its greatest concentration was in the South, and its victims were disproportionately black and poor. Ostensibly developed in response to penal, economic, or labor problems, forced labor was tightly bound to political, cultural, and social systems of racial oppression. Setting the Stage: The South after the Civil War After the Civil War, the South’s economy, infrastructure, politics, and society were left completely destroyed. Years of warfare had crippled the South’s economy, and the abolishment of slavery completely destroyed what was left. The South’s currency was worthless and its financial system was in ruins. For employers, workers, and merchants, this created many complex problems. With the abolishment of slavery, much of Southern planters’ wealth had disappeared. Accustomed to the unpaid labor of slaves, they were now faced with the need to pay their workers — but there was little cash available. In this environment, intricate systems of forced labor, which guaranteed cheap labor and ensured white control of that labor, flourished. For a brief period after the conclusion of fighting in the spring of 1865, Southern whites maintained control of the political system.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Prison Privatization in Arizona
    Prison Privatization in Arizona A briefing paper prepared by the American Friends Service Committee, Arizona Area Program American Friends Service Committee, Arizona Area 103 N. Park Ave., Ste. 111 Tucson, AZ 85719 (520)623-9141 (520)623-5901 fax [email protected] October 2010 Introduction The American Friends Service Committee (AFSC) is a Quaker organization that works for peace and justice worldwide. Our work is based on a commitment to nonviolence and the belief that all people have value and deserve to be treated with dignity and respect. The AFSC‟s programs promote social justice by focusing on a diverse set of social concerns. The organization‟s criminal justice work has always focused on the need for an effective and humane criminal justice system that emphasizes rehabilitation over punishment. Here in Arizona, our criminal justice program advocates for a reduction in the state‟s prison population through rational sentencing reform and a moratorium on new prison construction. A key focus of that effort is our work to educate the public on the risks inherent in prison privatization through for-profit prison corporations. This document is an attempt to paint a picture of the current efforts at privatization of prisons in the state of Arizona and raise questions about the potential pitfalls of this practice. Arizona Overview Arizona‟s experiment with for-profit incarceration began in the early 90‟s when the state faced the first of many prison overcrowding crises. Arizona‟s first privately operated prison was the Marana Community Correctional Treatment Facility, a minimum-security prison for people with substance abuse issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Educator Pedagogical Approach Shedding Light on Solitary Confinement Moya Atkinson, MSW May 2020
    Q&A: Educator Pedagogical Approach Shedding Light on Solitary Confinement Moya Atkinson, MSW May 2020 What approach to teaching about solitary confinement, and incarceration more broadly, do you recommend? The most powerful teaching approach is experiential, namely involvement in relevant activities coupled with reflection. Following are some learning opportunities for students that we recommend. Involvement and Observation 1. Witness the prison environment. Take part in a correctional facility tour: visit a prison, jail, or detention center. Some jails offer educational tours to college and university classes at the request of the professor. See, for example, information from the Orange County Corrections Department in Florida, and the Strafford County Department of Correction in New Hampshire. 2. Write letters to incarcerated people. See Letters from Solitary by Solitary Watch. Another excellent resource is the Prison and Justice Writing Program, which is part of PEN America, an organization that promotes the intersection of literature and human rights. Set up opportunities to interview returning citizens who were formerly incarcerated. 3. Experience solitary confinement virtually. The Guardian offers 6x9: A virtual experience of solitary confinement, which places you inside a U.S. solitary confinement prison cell. 4. Get involved in efforts by organizations that advocate for issues of solitary confinement and for the improvement of the justice system: Q&A: Educator Pedagogical Approach 2 American Civil Liberties Union The Vera Institute of Justice The Center for Constitutional Rights The Marshall Project (Abolition Resources) Prison Policy Initiative Center for Prison Reform (Explore their extensive list of organizations, including those for currently and formerly incarcerated people and for their families.) 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Supermax Isolation
    one Supermax Isolation Solitary confinement has been part of American correctional practice since the birth of the nation. Th e idea of isolating prisoners for their own good was supported in the fi nal years of the eighteenth century by such prominent fi gures as Benjamin Franklin and his friend Benjamin Rush, the pioneering psychiatrist. During that era, many Quakers viewed crime as a moral lapse and jail as a place where prisoners would be left by themselves in a cell and would be expected to search their souls about their errant ways and be “penitent” (thus the origin of the word penitentiary). But over the years, prison funding could not keep pace with a growing prison population, so this kind of solitary confi nement for the general population of prisoners was abandoned as too expensive to construct for or to maintain. Where solitary was retained, its original rehabilitative rationale was stripped away; it was now openly used merely as a dreaded punishment and deterrent within the prison and as a convenient means of separating out, for months, years, even decades, individuals whose inclusion in the general prison population might pose problems for prison management. the long history of solitary confinement in the united states Th e fi rst correctional facility in the nation to consign prisoners to single cells was the Walnut Street Jail in Philadelphia. It was originally built in 1773 to handle the overfl ow of prisoners from the nearby, massively overcrowded High Street Jail. Th ere were simply too many debtors, paupers, prostitutes, thieves, and ex- slaves going to jail for the jailers to fi nd the space to house them.
    [Show full text]
  • Treatment of American Prisoners of War in Southeast Asia 1961-1973 by John N. Powers
    Treatment of American Prisoners of War In Southeast Asia 1961-1973 By John N. Powers The years 1961 to 1973 are commonly used when studying American POWs during the Vietnam War, even though history books generally refer to the years 1964 to 1973 in defining that war. Americans were captured as early as 1954 and as late as 1975. In these pages the years 1961 to 1973 will be used. Americans were held prisoner by the North Vietnamese in North Vietnam, the Viet Cong (and their political arm the National Liberation Front) in South Vietnam, and the Pathet Lao in Laos. This article will not discuss those Americans held in Cambodia and China. The Defense Prisoner of War/Missing Personnel Office (DPMO) lists 687 American Prisoners of War who were returned alive by the Vietnamese from 1961 through 1976. Of this number, 72 were returned prior to the release of the bulk of the POWs in Operation Homecoming in 1973. Twelve of these early releases came from North Vietnam. DPMO figures list thirty-six successful escapes, thirty-four of them in South Vietnam and two in Laos. There were more than those thirty-six escapes, including some from prison camps in Hanoi itself. Some escapes ended in recapture within hours, some individuals were not recaptured for days, and some were simply never seen again. There were individuals who escaped multiple times, in both North and South Vietnam. However, only thirty- six American prisoners of war escaped and reached American forces. Of those thirty- six successful attempts, twenty-eight of them escaped within their first month of captivity.
    [Show full text]
  • Leo L. Stanley Scrapbooks and Papers, 1849-1974 (Bulk 1928-1965), MS 2061
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c80863rn No online items Finding aid to the Leo L. Stanley scrapbooks and papers, 1849-1974 (bulk 1928-1965), MS 2061 Finding aid prepared by California Historical Society staff. California Historical Society 678 Mission Street San Francisco, CA, 94105-4014 (415) 357-1848 [email protected] © 2001 Finding aid to the Leo L. Stanley MS 2061 1 scrapbooks and papers, 1849-1974 (bulk 1928-1965), ... Title: Leo L. Stanley scrapbooks and papers Date (bulk): 1928-1965 Date (inclusive): 1849-1974 Collection Identifier: MS 2061 Creator: Stanley, Leo L. (Leo Leonidas), b. 1886 Extent: 27 boxes (8 linear feet) Repository: California Historical Society 678 Mission Street San Francisco, CA, 94105 415-357-1848 [email protected] URL: http://www.californiahistoricalsociety.org/ Physical Location: Collection is stored onsite. Language of Materials: Collection Materials are in English Abstract: Comprises scrapbooks, correspondence, writings, publications, and other materials created or collected by Dr. Leo Leonidas Stanley documenting his personal research and professional work as a prison doctor, ship's physician, and medical experimenter (1913-1974). The scrapbooks contain Stanley's observations of conditions at prison hospitals and road camps in the United States and abroad, as well as descriptions of his travels. Scrapbooks, autobiographical writings, and other materials document the experimental testicular transplant surgeries Stanley performed during his tenure at San Quentin. The collection also contains Stanley's correspondence with prisoners, including J.P. "Bluebeard" Watson; Watson's writings, including his novel Tangled; and official reports and records Stanley collected or transcribed from San Quentin. Restrictions on Access Documents in the Leo L.
    [Show full text]
  • Ron Bloomfield, Acting Warden of San Quentin State Prison During 18 State Prison; State of COVID-19 Outbreak 19 California, Date: ______For Court to Fill
    NAME:____________________________ 1 2 CDCR#___________________________ 3 INSTITUTION:____________________ 4 ADDRESS:________________________ 5 6 ___________________________________ 7 CELL:__________ 8 9 Superior Court of California 10 ________________ County (Marin or conviction county) 11 12 13 In Re ________________, Court No: ________________ If known (your name) 14 Petitioner, Petition for Writ of 15 Habeas Corpus for vs. 16 Petitioner’s Immediate Release from San Quentin 17 Ron Bloomfield, Acting Warden of San Quentin State Prison During 18 State Prison; State of COVID-19 Outbreak 19 California, Date: ____________ For Court to fill 20 Time: ____________ Respondents. Dept: _____ 21 Petitioner _________________ requests this Court grant his Petition for 22 (your name) 23 24 - 1 - 25 San Quentin Habeas Petition In Re ___________ / Case no. ______ 26 27 28 1 Writ of Habeas Corpus and immediately release him from San Quentin 2 State Prison, where a massive outbreak of COVID-19 cases threatens his 3 health in violation of the Eighth Amendment. The issues are 4 5 1. Habeas corpus: immediate release pending decision 6 A writ of habeas corpus is the appropriate remedy for wrongful 7 imprisonment.1 Pending the outcome of habeas proceedings, the court may order Petitioner temporarily released from custody.2 If the claim 8 has merit and there is some urgency, the court may order the 9 custodian to show cause.3 Here, where Petitioner shows that continued confinement in San Quentin during the COVID-19 outbreak 10 poses dire health consequences, should he be released pending the 11 outcome of the habeas? 12 2. Eighth Amendment violation.
    [Show full text]
  • BSJ San Quentin Inmate Aly Tamboura Recounts Answer- Time Prison Jobs Ranging from Landscaping to Laundry
    Physics for Freedom: Opening the Cosmos for Those Inside Alexandra Latshaw Photo of San Quentin Prison from the San Quentin Prison Newspaper BSJ You’re taking Physics in prison? two courses per semester in addition to working full San Quentin inmate Aly Tamboura recounts answer- time prison jobs ranging from landscaping to laundry. ing his mother and close friend in the visiting room. The program is tuition free. Over 300 inmates are cur- -Yes, I am taking Physics in prison. rently enrolled and any prisoner classified as part of Tamboura recalls the experience of learning a new the general population with a record of good behav- language of science: “I am learning the same language ior is eligible to participate. The general population used by nearly all of the well known scientists like is roughly 1,800 men (Sheff, 2004) and includes those Newton, Einstein and Galileo… Who would have serving time for murder. This group does not include thought that the thousands of calculations the brain those on death row. makes when running to catch a fly ball on a baseball field could be jotted down on a chalkboard in a lan- guage I can understand?” (Tamboura, 2008). San Quentin State Prison is located on the north waterfront of San Francisco Bay in Marin County. The all male prison is famous for its many notable inmates from Charles Manson to Merle Haggard, high profile media events like Johnny Cash concerts, and its grisly role as exclusive site for California state executions. Designated by The New York Times as the largest death row in the western hemisphere (Nieves, 2011) it is also the only prison in California to offer inmates college level classes inside.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is a Prisoner of War For?
    19 WHAT IS A PRISONER OF WAR FOR? Professor John Hickman Associate Professor of Government, Berry College Abstract This article presents a conceptual map of the purposes served by continuing custody of prisoners of war and captured non-combatants. Morally legitimate and non-controversial purposes include preventing prisoners of war from rejoining their comrades-in-arms, preventing both prisoners of war and captured non-combatants from giving material support to combatants still in the field, facilitating orderly release and repatriation at the end of hostilities, and the prosecution for war crimes. Morally illegitimate purposes include punishment, exploitation as conscript labour, recruitment or conscription as combatants, exploitation for intelligence, display as proof of victory, and ideological indoctrination. Analysis of historical cases illustrating each purpose reveal that continuing custody is often motivated by multiple purposes, both legitimate and illegitimate. What explains adoption of multiple and illegitimate purposes for continuing custody? Prisoners are available for legitimate and illegitimate purposes because neither elites nor masses within the captor state typically view prisoners as members of the moral community.1 Continuing custody does not alter the perceived status of the captured as aliens who cannot be intuitively invested with expectations of reciprocity. This suggests both ending custody as soon as legitimate purposes are served and bringing the captured within the moral community while in continuing captivity. Introduction Throughout human history, those captured in war have presented their captors with the basic choice between immediate execution, immediate release, or continuing custody – holding them in custody pending their release or other 1 The moral community comprises those persons to whom moral obligations are owed because moral values are shared.
    [Show full text]