DOCSLIB.ORG

Nottingham City Market Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nottingham City Market Report NOTTINGHAM CITY MARKET REPORT STUDENT PROPERTY RESEARCH | 2019 / 20 Q2 2020 Connecting people & property, perfectly. NOTTINGHAM CITY MARKET REPORT - 1 - NOTTINGHAM CITY MARKET REPORT INTRODUCTION This City Market Report outlines the key metrics associated with purpose built student accommodation in Nottingham. The report positions the city in the context of the wider UK market and illustrates key comparators. The report illustrates the key locations for purpose built student accommodation and analyses the demand and supply dynamics in Nottingham, with a focus on Pricing, Accommodation types and future supply of student beds. CONTENTS UK Student Populations 3 Higher Education Institutions 4 Purpose Built Student Accommodation 5 Pricing 6 Development Pipeline 7 Appendix I – University Locations and PBSA Locations 8 Appendix II – Bed Numbers and Pricing 9 Appendix III – Development Pipeline 11 Knight Frank Student Team 12 NOTTINGHAM SUMMARY Close to Derby, Loughborough 2 hours by train to London 2 Higher Education Institutions 18% of the city population are students 59,397 full time students 15% Growth since 2013/14 19% of student population are international 55% Students unable to access PBSA - 2 - NOTTINGHAM CITY MARKET REPORT UK STUDENT POPULATIO NS A map of key purpose built student accommodation markets in the UK. University campuses and purpose built student accommodation locations. - 3 - NOTTINGHAM CITY MARKET REPORT HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIO NS University performance Nottingham student growth Nottingham student growth international UK Rankings and Student Satisfaction are based on The Times Good University Guide 2020, and the World Rankings based on Times Higher Education World University Rankings. Full time UK students Full time international students In thousands In thousands Income % UK rankings World Student Institution Mission group tuition UK Undergraduates UK Postgraduates Non-UK Undergraduates Non-UK Postgraduates (vs 2019) ranking satisfaction fees 60 14 University of Nottingham 21 +5 149 78 Russell Group 50% 50 12 10 40 The Nottingham Trent University 40 +3 601–800 81.7 University Alliance 83% 8 30 6 20 4 10 2 - - 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 Source: Knight Frank, HESA Source: Knight Frank, HESA Total student growth since 2014/15: International growth since 2014/15: Nottingham international students UK international students Top 5 international domiciles Top 5 international domiciles % of total international students % of total international students China: (28%) China: (26%) India: (7%) India: (5%) Hong Kong: (5%) United States: (4%) Nottingham UK Nottingham UK Malaysia: (5%) Hong Kong: (3%) Nigeria: (3%) Malaysia: (3%) 17% 11% 19% 13% Other: (52%) Other: (59%) Source: Knight Frank, HESA Source: Knight Frank, HESA University student numbers Nottingham Nottingham Student number statistics based on the latest HESA 2018/19 data. Undergraduate applications Undergraduate acceptances In thousands In thousands Institution Full-time Full-time Total full- % Growth % Non UK 3 Year under- post- time HE since students CAGR graduates graduates students 2014/15 UK EU Non-EU UK EU Non-EU 120 25 University of Nottingham 24,576 6,523 25% 31,099 11% 3% 100 20 The Nottingham Trent University 24,921 3,377 13% 28,298 26% 8% 80 15 60 Nottingham Total 49,497 9,900 19% 59,397 17% 5% 10 40 20 5 - - 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Source: Knight Frank, UCAS Source: Knight Frank, UCAS - 4 - NOTTINGHAM CITY MARKET REPORT PURPOSE BUILT STUDEN T ACCOMMODATION Types of accommodation and the level of provision in Nottingham. University sector PBSA: Private sector PBSA: Schemes Beds Schemes Beds 31 12,098 61 14,861 Comprises university halls of residence and private sector stock on leases or agreements to the higher education Comprises purpose built student accommodation, which is not affiliated with a university. institutions. City market comparison Accommodation types Ranked by % unable to access PBSA Beds by room type PBSA year of opening Source: HESA 2018/19 % In thousands Nottingham Region Full-time students % Living at home % unable to access % unable to 2019 PBSA (gross) access PBSA (net) UK UK 1,858,813 20% 64% 56% 2018 11% Exeter 22,947 3% 60% 59% 2017 Southampton 30,223 7% 55% 51% York 23,769 6% 59% 56% 26% 27% 2016 Leeds 57,851 12% 60% 54% 2015 51% Nottingham 59,397 12% 55% 48% 2014 38% 2013 Loughborough 16,824 5% 54% 52% 47% Cardiff 35,294 12% 53% 46% 2012 Lincoln 15,200 11% 52% 46% Sheffield 52,206 13% 48% 41% Pre-2012 There are 59,397 full-time students in Nottingham, therefore, 55% of students in Nottingham are unable to access Non En-suite En-suite Studio - 5 10 15 20 25 30 purpose built student accommodation or a student to bed ratio of 2.1:1 Source: Knight Frank Source: Knight Frank - 5 - NOTTINGHAM CITY MARKET REPORT PRICING Rental profile across accommodation types in Nottingham. Average rental growth across all PBSA Knight Frank's Student Property Index indicates headline rental growth for purpose built student accommodation (PBSA) across Nottingham of 3.1% for the 2019/20 academic year. This is higher than performance across the UK as a whole of 2.4%. Nottingham UK 3.1% 2.4% Average rents in Nottingham Rent per week across the range of room types adjusted to 51 weeks tenancies. Non PBSA room type based on 2 or more bedroom property and incl. bills of £20pw. Source: Rightmove, Knight Frank Student Property. Non en-suite En-suite Studio Non PBSA1 £107 £124 £164 £127 PBSA rental distribution Rental distribution across the four accommodation types £ per week Non En-suite En-suite Studio Non PBSA 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 % ofspacesbed 15 10 5 0 £40 £60 £80 £100 £120 £140 £160 £180 £200 £220 £240 £260 £280 £300 £320 Source: Knight Frank, Rightmove - 6 - NOTTINGHAM CITY MARKET REPORT DEVELOPMENT PIPELINE A snapshot of the planning pipeline in Nottingham as at October 2019. We use third party data and our own insight of the market to provide an estimated pipeline of student beds. Source: Glenigan, Knight Frank Student Property. Development pipeline (under construction): Planning applications (with consent): 4 1,033 15 2,689 Development pipeline map Nottingham development pipeline University and Private sector beds with planning permission Stage of planning Total no. of beds Source: Knight Frank Research Planning applications submitted (no consent) 1,274 Ref Address Total Planning applications with consent 2,689 beds Development pipeline (under construction) 1,033 1 RedOak Property 353 2 Vita Student Ltd 323 Total beds (in all stages of pipeline) 4,996 3 Aspbury Planning Ltd 301 4 Mr K Tang 56 Expected delivery of development pipeline Year Total no. of beds Academic year 2019-2020 - Academic year 2020-2021 1,033 2021 and beyond - Total pipeline under construction 1,033 When the development pipeline under construction is completed, the proportion of existing students unable to access PBSA would change from 55% to 53%. This projection is dependent on a number of implicit assumptions; in particular, that the student population remains unchanged. - 7 - NOTTINGHAM CITY MARKET REPORT APPENDIX I – UNIVERS ITY LOCATIONS AND PB SA LOCATION S Ref Property Total beds 1 University Park - All Hal 3,205 2 Broadgate Park 2,200 3 Madison Gardens 1,196 4 Raleigh Park 1,196 5 Nottingham Two 1,096 6 St Peters Court 807 7 New Hall 727 8 Bonington Student Village 723 9 Perverell 722 10 Trinity Square 700 11 The Glasshouse 674 12 Liberty Point 602 13 Jubilee Campus 600 14 The Village 566 15 Byron Residence 559 16 Brackenhurst Campus 491 17 Radford Mill 483 18 Riverside Point 483 19 Gill Street North 446 20 Global Point 440 21 Nova 434 22 Victoria House 421 23 Goldsmith Court 378 24 Gill Street South 352 25 Newtown & Newland House 350 26 Norton Court 312 27 iQ Exchange 277 28 Cotton Mills 274 29 The Maltings 266 30 Meridian Court 250 30+ See Appendix II - 8 - NOTTINGHAM CITY MARKET REPORT APPENDIX II – BED NU MBERS AND PRICING University and private owned purpose built student accommodation schemes operating in Nottingham in 2019/20. This table includes a reference to the map in Appendix I, total bed numbers by scheme and average weekly rents. Term length based on typical tenancy offered at property. Source: Knight Frank Student Property Ref Operator name Property name Total beds Non En-suite Studio Ref Operator name Property name Total beds Non En-suite Studio en-suite en-suite Private sector PBSA Weekly rents from* Private sector PBSA Weekly rents from* 3 Derwent Students Madison Gardens 1,196 £102 - - 61 Mezzino Graystacks 84 £120 £128 - 4 Derwent Students Raleigh Park 1,196 £103 £128 - 62 Student Cribs Park View 68 £132 - £179 5 Student Roost Nottingham Two 1,096 - £145 £155 63 Kexgill Student Accommodation Royal Albert Mill 67 £97 - - 6 UNITE Students St Peters Court 807 - £128 - 64 Hello Student Talbot Point 67 - £153 £163 8 Campus Living Villages Bonington Student Village 723 £99 £109 £164 65 Purple Frog Property Ltd The Forster Street Buildi 65 £108 - £110 10 Student Roost Trinity Square 700 - £159 £175 66 UPP Cloister House 63 - - - 11 Homes For Students The Glasshouse 674 £108 £134 £160 67 Primo Property Management Halley House 61 - - £125 12 Liberty Living Liberty Point 602 - £107 - 68 The Student Lodge Provident Works 58 - - - 14 Manor Villages The Village 566 £116 £126 - 69 Fortis Student Letting Bard House 52 - - £135 18 UNITE Students Riverside Point 483 - £143 £193 70 Purple Frog Property Ltd Hockley Point 49 £109 - - 20 Kaplan Residences Global Point 440 - £139
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 04 E 157 Traianou AFT Mdh E015p039
    Vol. 15: 39–47, 2015 ETHICS IN SCIENCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS Published online May 27 doi: 10.3354/esep00157 Ethics Sci Environ Polit Contribution to the Theme Section ‘Academic freedom and tenure’ OPENPEN ACCESSCCESS AS I SEE IT The erosion of academic freedom in UK higher education Anna Traianou* Department of Educational Studies, Goldsmiths, University of London, New Cross, SE14 6NW, UK ABSTRACT: In this article, I treat ‘academic freedom’ as referring to the autonomy that academics need if they are to do their work well, on analogy with what is required in other professional occupations. In these terms, I argue that there are 2 aspects of academic freedom: the degree of autonomy that universities have from governments, and the autonomy that academics have within universities. Using this framework, I explore how, from the 1980s onwards, UK governments have increasingly intervened in higher education, on the basis of the assumption that universities must serve the economy, seeking to maximize and measure the ‘returns’ on public investment. I argue that these external developments have promoted internal changes within universities away from collegial modes of organization and towards more managerial ones, and as a result have signifi- cantly reduced academic freedom. I conclude by briefly examining developments in the UK in terms of a rather different conception of academic freedom, one that is currently quite influential, which virtually identifies it with ‘free speech’ for academics and students. KEY WORDS: Academic freedom · Neoliberalism · New public management · UK higher education · Professionalism · Free speech INTRODUCTION which have not opposed the siege of Gaza (see But- ler 2006, Goldberg 2013, Robin 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Azad Kashmir
    Azad Kashmir The home of British Kashmiris Waving flags of their countries of origin by some members of diaspora (overseas) communities in public space is one of the most common and visible expressions of their ‘other’ or ‘homeland’ identity or identities. In Britain, the South Asian diaspora communities are usually perceived as Indian, Pakistani, (since 1971) Bangladeshis and Sri Lankans. However, there is another flag that is sometimes sighted on such public gatherings as Eid festivals, Pakistani/Indian Cricket Matches or political protests across Britain. 1 This is the official flag of the government of Azad Jammu and Kashmir. 'Azad Kashmir' is a part of the divided state of Jammu Kashmir. Its future is yet to be determined along with rest of the state. As explained below in detail, Azad Kashmir is administered by Pakistan but it is not part of Pakistan like Punjab, Sindh, Pakhtoon Khuwa and Baluchistan. However, as a result of the invasion of India and Pakistan to capture Kashmir in October 1947 and the subsequent involvement of United Nations, Pakistan is responsible for the development and service provision including passports for the people of Azad Kashmir and Gilgit Baltistan, another part of Kashmir that is not part of, but is controlled by, Pakistan. Under the same UN resolutions India is responsible for the Indian controlled part of Kashmir. In all parts of the divided Kashmir there are political movements of different intensity striving for greater rights and autonomy, self-rule and/or independence. The focus of this chapter, however, is primarily on Azad Kashmir, the home of nearly a million strong British Kashmiri community.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Protection and Research Ethics Challenges and Opportunities
    Researching Extremist Content on Social Media Platforms: Data Protection and Research Ethics Challenges and Opportunities Manjana Sold, Julian Junk GNET is a special project delivered by the International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation, King’s College London. The authors of this report are Manjana Sold and Julian Junk The Global Network on Extremism and Technology (GNET) is an academic research initiative backed by the Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism (GIFCT), an independent but industry‑funded initiative for better understanding, and counteracting, terrorist use of technology. GNET is convened and led by the International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation (ICSR), an academic research centre based within the Department of War Studies at King’s College London. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing those, either expressed or implied, of GIFCT, GNET or ICSR. CONTACT DETAILS For questions, queries and additional copies of this report, please contact: ICSR King’s College London Strand London WC2R 2LS United Kingdom T. +44 20 7848 2098 E. [email protected] Twitter: @GNET_research Like all other GNET publications, this report can be downloaded free of charge from the GNET website at www.gnet‑research.org. © GNET Researching Extremist Content on Social Media Platforms: Data Protection and Research Ethics Challenges and Opportunities Executive Summary he nexus between terrorism and technology is socially and politically more relevant than ever. Almost every mobilisation and Tradicalisation process and every violent attack, whether carried out or prevented, has an online component to it. Researchers, not least those involved in GNET, are meeting head on the challenge of analysing these processes in difficult empirical online environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrorism Acts Uk
    TERRORISM ACTS UK https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents_in_Great_Britain List of terrorist incidents in Great Britain The following is a list of terrorist incidents in Great Britain, including incidents where people were arrested under the terrorist laws and later released without charge, but excluding events in Northern Ireland – a part of the United Kingdom. Contents • Attacks involving violence or serious threat to life • 1970s • 1980s • 1990s • 2000s • 2010–present • Prevented, failed or aborted attacks • Arrests, detentions, and other incidents related to the Terrorism Acts • See also • References Attacks involving violence or serious threat to life 1970s § 1971, 12 January: Two bombs exploded at the house of government minister Robert Carr. This attack was one of 25 carried out by the Angry Brigade between August 1970 and August 1971. The Bomb Squad was established at Scotland Yard in January 1971 to target the group, and they were apprehended in August of that year.[1][2] § 1971, 31 October: A bomb exploded in the Post Office Tower in London causing extensive damage but no injuries. The "Kilburn Battalion" of the IRA claimed responsibility for the explosion.[3] § 1972, 22 February: The Official Irish Republican Army killed seven civilians in the Aldershot bombing. § 1972, 19 September: The group Black September posted a letter bomb to the Israeli embassy in London killing an Israeli diplomat.[4] § 1973: The Provisional IRA exploded a car bomb in the street outside the Old Bailey. A shard of glass is preserved as a reminder, embedded in the wall at the top of the main stairs. § 1973, 10 September: The Provisional IRA set off bombs at London's King's Cross Station and Euston Station injuring 21 people.[5] § 1974, 4 February: Eight soldiers and 4 civilians killed by the Provisional IRA in the M62 coach bombing.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy
    University of Bath PHD Understanding Counter-Terrorism Policy and Practice in the UK since 9/11 Sabir, Rizwaan Sabir Award date: 2014 Awarding institution: University of Bath Link to publication Alternative formats If you require this document in an alternative format, please contact: [email protected] General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 26. Sep. 2021 Understanding Counter-Terrorism Policy and Practice in the UK since 9/11 Rizwaan Sabir A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Bath Department of Social and Policy Sciences March 2014 COPYRIGHT Attention is drawn to the fact that copyright of this thesis rests with the author. A copy of this thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with the author and that they must not copy it or use material from it except as permitted by law or with the consent of the author.
    [Show full text]
  • “No Judgement Was Made by Us”: How Two Innocent Men Came to Be Arrested on Terrorism Charges at the University of Notting
    Radicalisation at universities or radicalisation by universities?: How a student¶VXVHRI a library book became a ³PDMRU,VODPLVWSORW´ ROD THORNTON School of Politics and International Relations, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom Email: [email protected] Paper prepared for the Critical Studies on Terrorism on Teaching About Terrorism panel at the British International Studies Association Conference, University of Manchester, April 2011 Abstract: In May 2008, on the campus of the University of Nottingham, two men of ethnic minority background - a student and an administrator - were arrested and held for six days under the Terrorism Act 2000. Their crime was to have in their possession three documents ± DOORIZKLFKZHUHLQIDFWDYDLODEOHIURPWKHLURZQXQLYHUVLW\¶VOLEUDU\ The police had made their arrests based on erroneous evidence provided by two men: the Registrar of the University of Nottingham and an academic within the institution. Subsequently, despite being made aware of the mistakes it had made, the university not only refused to apologise to the two arrested men but it also began to resort to defensive measures that attempted to discredit the names both of the two accused and of innocent university employees. Untruth piled on untruth until a point was reached where the Home Office itself IDUFLFDOO\FDPHWRDGYHUWLVHWKHFDVHDVµDPDMRU,VODPLVWSORW¶Many lessons can be learnt from what happened at the University of Nottingham. This incident is an indication of the way in which, in the United Kingdom of today, young Muslim men can EHFRPHVRHDVLO\WDUUHGZLWKWKHEUXVKRIEHLQJµWHUURULVWV¶.1 Keywords: academic freedom, BIS, discrimination, ethnic minority, freedom of speech, Home Office, Muslim, Nottingham, police, radicalisation, student, terrorism, Terrorism Act, university, University of Nottingham.
    [Show full text]
  • “No Judgement Was Made by Us”: How Two Innocent Men Came to Be Arrested on Terrorism Charges at the University of Notting
    Radicalisation at universities or radicalisation by universities?: How a student‟s use of a library book became a “major Islamist plot” ROD THORNTON School of Politics and International Relations, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom Email: [email protected] Paper prepared for the Critical Studies on Terrorism on Teaching About Terrorism panel at the British International Studies Association Conference, University of Manchester, April 2011 Abstract: In May 2008, on the campus of the University of Nottingham, two men of ethnic minority background - a student and an administrator - were arrested and held for six days under the Terrorism Act 2000. Their crime was to have in their possession three documents – all of which were, in fact, available from their own university‟s library. The police had made their arrests based on erroneous evidence provided by two men: the Registrar of the University of Nottingham and an academic within the institution. Subsequently, despite being made aware of the mistakes it had made, the university not only refused to apologise to the two arrested men but it also began to resort to defensive measures that attempted to discredit the names both of the two accused and of innocent university employees. Untruth piled on untruth until a point was reached where the Home Office itself farcically came to advertise the case as „a major Islamist plot‟. Many lessons can be learnt from what happened at the University of Nottingham. This incident is an indication of the way in which, in the United Kingdom of today, young Muslim men can become so easily tarred with the brush of being „terrorists‟.1 Keywords: academic freedom, BIS, discrimination, ethnic minority, freedom of speech, Home Office, Muslim, Nottingham, police, radicalisation, student, terrorism, Terrorism Act, university, University of Nottingham.
    [Show full text]
  • Pulling Back the Curtain: an Examination of the English
    PULLING BACK THE CURTAIN: AN EXAMINATION OF THE ENGLISH DEFENCE LEAGUE AND THEIR USE OF FACEBOOK Teddy Wayne Reynolds A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 2015 Full metadata for this item is available in Research@StAndrews:FullText at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/6927 This item is protected by original copyright This item is licensed under a Creative Commons Licence Pulling Back the Curtain: An Examination of the English Defence League and Their Use of Facebook Teddy Wayne Reynolds This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment for the degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 16 September, 2013 Pulling Back the Curtain: An Examination of the English Defence League and Their Use of Facebook Submitted by: Teddy Wayne Reynolds Declarations 1. Candidate’s declarations: I, Teddy Wayne Reynolds, hereby certify that this thesis, which is approximately 80,000 words in length, has been written by me, that it is the record of work carried out by me and that it has not been submitted in any previous application for a higher degree. I was admitted as a research student in September 2009 and as a candidate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in May 2010; the higher study for which this is a record was carried out in the University of St Andrews between 2009 and 2013. ______________ ____________________________ Date Teddy Wayne Reynolds 2. Supervisor’s declaration: I hereby certify that the candidate has fulfilled the conditions of the Resolution and Regulations appropriate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of St Andrews and that the candidate is qualified to submit this thesis in application for that degree.
    [Show full text]
  • GEP Annual Report for 2008
    GEP Annual Report to the Leverhulme Trust 8 0 0 2 2 Acknowledgements This report outlines research and outreach activities conducted by the Centre in the calendar year 2008. Support from the Leverhulme Trustees and core funding from the Leverhulme Trust under Programme Grant F/00 114/AM is warmly acknowledged. We would also like to thank Sir Richard Brook, the Trust’s Director, for his continued wise counsel and encouragement to move forward with new research initiatives and ventures. Finally, we greatly appreciate the advice offered by our Strategic Advisory Board Members and their involvement in the Centre’s activities through the year. i Leverhulme Centre for Research on Globalisation and Economic Policy (GEP): 2008 Annual Report to the Leverhulme Trust Contents A. Introduction 1 B. Globalising GEP – Malaysia and China 2 C. Research Programmes 3 D. Internal Research Fellows 7 E. Promoting Careers in the Economics Discipline 8 F. External Research Fellows and Visitors 9 G. Published Output in 200 8 10 H. Conferences and Seminars 11 I. Public Lectures 13 J. User Engagement and Outreach 15 K. GEP in the Media 16 L. The Year Ahead 17 Appendices: Publications Appendix 1 – GEP Research Papers in 2008 18 Appendix 2 – Published Output of Internal Research Fellows in 2008 20 Conferences and Seminars Appendix 3 – GEP Seventh Annual Postgraduate Conference 23 Appendix 4 – GEP Conferences for Sixth-Form Students 26 Appendix 5 – June 2008 GEP Conference Programme on Offshoring 27 Appendix 6 – Workshop on ‘Testing Trade Models with Labour Market
    [Show full text]
  • Law for Ethnographers
    MIO0010.1177/2059799117720607Methodological InnovationsElliott and Fleetwood 720607research-article2017 Article Methodological Innovations 2017, Vol. 10(1) 1-13 Law for ethnographers © The Author(s) 2017 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799117720607DOI: 10.1177/2059799117720607 mio.sagepub.com Tracey Elliott1 and Jennifer Fleetwood2 Abstract Despite a long history of ethnographic research on crime, ethnographers have shied away from examining the law as it relates to being present at, witnessing and recording illegal activity. However, knowledge of the law is an essential tool for researchers and the future of ethnographic research on crime. This article reviews the main relevant legal statutes in England and Wales and considers their relevance for contemporary ethnographic research. We report that researchers have no legal responsibility to report criminal activity (with some exceptions). The circumstances under which legal action could be taken to seize research data are specific and limited, and respondent’s privacy is subject to considerable legal protection. Our review gives considerable reason to be optimistic about the future of ethnographic research. Keywords law, ethnography, confidentiality Introduction Ethnographers of crime and deviance have long trod the thin for researchers to be granted legal privileges to guarantee line between observing and participating in criminal activi- respondents’ confidentiality, as occurs for government-funded ties, so it is somewhat surprising
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Review and Financial Statements 2020 Strategic Review and Financial Statements 2020 Council Membership 1 August 2019 to 31 July 2020 Contents
    Strategic review and financial statements 2020 Strategic review and financial statements 2020 Council membership 1 August 2019 to 31 July 2020 Contents The Council is the University’s governing body and, among other matters, it is responsible for overseeing the administration and management of the affairs of the University and is required to present audited Council membership 2 financial statements for each financial year. Foreword by the Vice-Chancellor 4 Chair of Council External members appointed Other senior officers Strategic review 6 and Pro-Chancellor by the Council of the University John Mills (until 31 December 2019) Simon Amess Chancellor Governance 14 Sir Keith O’Nions Vicky Bailey Baroness Young of Hornsey OBE (from 1 January 2020) Lynette Eastman Registrar Financial review 20 Dr Paul Greatrix Vice-Chair of Council Sonya Leydecker (Secretary to Council) Nora Senior Independent auditor’s report 28 Sherry Madera Pro-Vice-Chancellors Professor Graham Kendall Members ex-Officio Carolyn Morgan Statement of principal accounting policies 31 Pro-Chancellor Trevor Moss Professor Nick Miles OBE Dr Hamid Mughal OBE Richard Newsome Professor Sarah Sharples Financial statements 34 President and Vice-Chancellor Sir Keith O’Nions Professor Robert Mokaya Professor Shearer West (until 31 December 2019) Faculty Pro-Vice-Chancellors Notes to the financial statements 40 Provost and Deputy David Tilly Professor John Atherton Vice-Chancellor Professor Jeremy Gregory Professor Andy Long Appointed by the Professor Todd Landman Treasurer Students’
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Statements for the Year to 31 July 2016
    Financial Statements for the year to 31 July 2016 Financial Statements for the year to 31 July 2016 Contents Vice-Chancellor’s Welcome 3 – 4 Strategy Review 5 – 13 Treasurer's Report 14 – 27 Strategy and Risk 28 – 29 Public Benefit Statement 30 - 36 Governance 37 - 44 Report of the Independent Auditor 45 Statement of Principal Accounting Policies 46 - 50 Financial Statements 51 – 54 Notes to the Accounts 55 – 69 The University of Nottingham Financial Statements for the year ended 31 July 2016 Page | 1 COUNCIL MEMBERSHIP (1 August 2015 to 31 July 2016) President of Council and Pro-Chancellor: John Mills Vice-President of Council: Dame Elizabeth Fradd Members ex-Officio Pro-Chancellor: Dr Hamid Mughal OBE The Vice-Chancellor: Professor Sir David Greenaway Deputy Vice-Chancellor: Professor Karen Cox The Treasurer: Stephen Walton Pro-Vice-Chancellors: Professor Sarah O’Hara Professor Hai-Sui Yu Members of Staff Professor Tony Avery [from 18 November 2015] Professor Neil Crout Dr Rachel Gomes Professor Christine Hall Dr Gabriele Neher External members appointed by the Council Baroness Brenda Dean John Finch Dame Asha Khemka Trevor Moss [from 1 October 2015] Jeff Randall David Ross John Saunders David Tilly [from 1 February 2016] Neil Watkinson Louise Wilson Appointed by the Union of Students From 1 July 2015 to 30 June 2016 Angharad Smith (President) Daniel Rattigan (Education Officer) From 1 July 2016 Ismail Sadurdeen(President) Beth Massey(Education Officer) Other Senior Officers The Chancellor: Sir Andrew Witty The Registrar: Dr Paul Greatrix
    [Show full text]