Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study Post-Consultation Report | July 2021 Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Table of Contents Executive Summary 03

1. Introduction. 09

2. Approach to Public Consultation. 11

3. Informing the Public. 13

4. Publicising the Public Consultation. 15

5. Feedback and Submissions Overview. 16

6. Walking and Cycling. 21

7. Public Transport. 22

8. Access, Gates and Roads. 24

9. Other Considerations. 26

10. Public Consultation Process. 29

11. Conclusion and Next Steps. 30

Appendices.

2 Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Executive Summary

With regard to the proposals to Knockmaroon The Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study also recognised the unique and complex This Post-Consultation Report aims to set out how Gate/Road, further data collection and traffic variety of functions that the Park serves, including the public consultation process was managed, how modelling is to be undertaken with a view to its historic landscape, biodiversity habitat, visitor many people interacted with the public implementing this action in Phase 3. In tandem consultation, and summarise the issues and with the introduction of the pilot bus service, attractions and recreational space. Cabra Gate will convert to a bus only gate. concerns raised throughout the public consultation A non-statutory public consultation on the Phoenix  Pilot Cul de Sac Proposals | The proposed Cul de process. Key outcomes and next steps are set out Park Transport and Mobility Options Study took Sac for the Upper Glen Road will proceed on a in this report. place over six weeks between 29th January and pilot basis subject to data collection and review. 12th March 2021. We will not be proceeding with the cul de sac on the North Road. The COVID-19 pandemic and associated As a result of the feedback received during the Government restrictions were in effect during this Overview of key Outcomes consultation, the North Road proposal will now be period, so the public consultation format was  Consultation participation | Over 2,200 piloted as a one-way route from Cabra Gate to adapted to ensure compliance with guidelines at submissions were received from members of the Garda HQ, i.e. West to East. Car parking will be the time. An online public consultation experience public, stakeholders and elected representatives. maintained on the North Road. This will allow for or virtual room was provided to allow stakeholders  Walking and Cycling Improvements | The comprehensive studies to be undertaken and and the general public to view maps and project majority of the feedback supported the reviewed. information and to submit their feedback in a safe implementation of new and improved pedestrian and accessible environment. and cycle routes including facilities for the public Process as well as linking to routes external to the park. Minister of State with responsibility for the Office In the past year, the Phoenix Park has been  Public Transport Proposal | A significant of Public Works, Patrick O’Donovan welcomed appreciated by all users as a valued urban green proportion of the public supported people using people into the room through a video and space. The need to protect and conserve the more sustainable ways to access the park. The encouraged feedback on all aspects of the Study. historic character of the Park and its natural majority of feedback received supported the heritage is overwhelmingly supported by the public. The public was informed of the consultation via preferred bus option for the proposed route in the A Steering Group supported by a Working Group traditional media articles and newspaper and radio Study stopping at visitor attractions in the Park comprising officials from the Office of Public adverts, posters on entrance gates in the Park, and linking with Heuston Station and Broombridge Works, the National Transport Authority, Dublin City online methods such as social media posts and Station. Council, Fingal County Council and external adverts on social media platforms. The Project  Access, Gates and Roads Proposals | It should experts, worked in collaboration, to develop a Team held twelve meetings with elected be noted that all gates currently open will remain framework to help shape and inform a vision for representatives and key stakeholders. open. The majority of the feedback supported the how visitors will access, experience and move principle of reducing traffic in the Park. The The virtual room consultation received almost within the Phoenix Park. This will ensure the Ashtown Gate will remain two-way in the medium 7,000 unique visitors. The majority of visitors used integrity of the Phoenix Park as a public term until further studies are undertaken. their mobile phones to view the information (4,387 recreational amenity is preserved whilst users). This was followed by over 2,000 users accommodating access for all. using a computer device.

3 Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Consultation Findings Only 8% of respondents indicated that they used AGE OF RESPONDENT Over 2,200 submissions were made by the general the Phoenix Park as a commuter route. While 1% of public, organisations, and elected representatives. respondents are employed within the Park, some 3% of respondents use it for parking. It is

The study received the most responses from 30% private individuals along with 94 responses from significant to note that of those who travel to the Organisations and 28 responses from Resident 27% Phoenix Park, just over 30% travel by car, 30% cycle Associations. while 30% walk. At present, only 6% avail of public

22% transport while accessing the Phoenix Park. The majority of submissions received were through the online feedback form. We also received a large WHY PEOPLE TRAVEL TO volume via email and some through the Freepost THE PARK address.

The large volume of submissions received during 9% 8%

the consultation period demonstrates that, despite 24%

pandemic restrictions, a significant proportion of 22% 3% the public expressed their views on the Transport 2% and Mobility Options Study. 24 29 39 49 64 - - - - - Submissions type Numbers of submissions 15% 15 25 30 40 50 13% Feedback Form 1,293 11% submissions 8%

Postal submissions 23 65 AND OVER Email submissions 978 3%

PREFER SAY TO NOT PREFER 2% 1%

Total submissions 2,294 1%

1% … … A broad representation of age groups participated … with the consultation process. The age profile of people submitting an online feedback form was Other 30% of over 50-year olds, almost 30% of 40 to 49- year-olds, and 30% of 30 to 39-year-olds. The

majority of respondents live within the Dublin 7, For exercise Dublin 15 and Dublin City Council administrative I work in the Park the workI in areas. When asked how frequently respondents I go on family outings visited the Park currently, the majority of responses For visitor attractions (59%) indicated daily or several times a week. Socialisingfriends with Visiting Visiting otherinstitutions I use the parking facilities parking facilities the use I From the analysis of submissions received on why people travelled to the Phoenix Park, 85% of HositpalMary's or Visiting St. Avail of the outdoor amenities of respondents go to the Phoenix Park to use the travelI through the Park on tomy amenities, visit attractions, socialise with friends or Movement Principles for outdoor exercise.

4 Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Feedback form respondents were asked if they Conclusion and Next Steps Access, Gates and Roads Proposals supported the movement principles of the Study. The information and comments received in the Some 74% of respondents supported the view that The responses were overwhelmingly in favour of submissions were categorised into five common Park roads are primarily for people visiting and the principles. The highest agreement was 95.5% themes, Walking and Cycling, Access, Gates and working in the Park. Significant feedback was supporting ‘The Park is for People’. The lowest in Roads, Public Transport, Other Considerations and received concerning the Access, Gates and Roads favour but still at 72.4% was for the principle ‘We Public Consultation. Just over 40% of the feedback proposals. will seek to reduce commuter through traffic’, as received was about Access, Gates and Roads. While the public supported the Movement illustrated in the figures below. The second highest themes was Other Principles in general, some feedback suggested that traffic congestion may occur, particular in DO YOU SUPPORT THE Considerations which included topics such as park Castleknock and Chapelizod villages. Accordingly, MOVEMENT PRINCIPLES OF infrastructure, biodiversity etc. Over 15% of the Ashtown Gate will remain two-way in the THE PHOENIX PARK responses was with regard to Walking and Cycling. medium term until further studies are undertaken. TRANSPORT AND MOBILITY Public Transport accounted for just under 10% of OPTIONS STUDY? the feedback. With regard to the proposals to Knockmaroon Walking and Cycling Improvements Gate/Road, further data collection and traffic Yes No 83% of respondents supported enhanced walking modelling is to be undertaken with a view to and cycling facilities and therefore these proposals implementing this action in Phase 3. In tandem with the introduction of the pilot bus service, Cabra We will protect and will be advanced in the short to medium term, as conserve the Biodiversity Gate will convert to a bus only exit/entry point. No and historic landscape 91.50% 8.50% resources are made available. All entrance fabric of the Phoenix Park arrangements will be reviewed so as to prioritise other gates will be impacted as a result of the pedestrian and cyclist access, as appropriate to the proposals within this study. park designations. The Park is for People 95.50% 4.50% The proposed Cul de Sac for the Upper Glen Road Public Transport Proposals will proceed on a pilot basis subject to data collection and review in Phase 1. We will not be Over 77% of respondents supported the provision We will encourage the use proceeding with the cul de sac on the North Road. of public transport to major visitor attractions of more sustainable ways 83.10% 16.90% As a result of the feedback received during the to access the Park within the Park. The feedback received during the consultation, the North Road proposal will now be consultation was broadly supportive of the We will liaise and consult piloted as a one-way route from Cabra Gate to with interested and proposed bus route stopping at visitor attractions relevant parties and Garda HQ, i.e. West to East. This will allow for organisations in the 90.40% 9.40% in the Phoenix Parking and linking the multi-modal achievement of these comprehensive studies to be undertaken and principles transport interchange at Heuston Station and reviewed. Broombridge Station. We will seek to reduce Movement within the Park commuter through traffic 72.40% 27.60% Further relevant studies will need to be carried out prior to any expansion of this service in tandem In the interest of public safety, a 30km/h speed with relevant stakeholders. Currently, only 6% of limit will be introduced within the Phoenix Park. Concerns were raised with regard to the lack of We will make evidence- the public avail of public transport while accessing based decisions 88.80% 11.20% the Phoenix Park. The introduction of sustainable parking within the Park. transport into the Park is in line with Government objectives for more sustainable travel.

5 Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

However, it is noted that there are currently in The Minister and the Steering Group would like to excess of 2,000 surfaced parking spaces spread thank all members of the public and organisations throughout the park including Farmleigh. Given the who participated in the consultation process. high profile of the visitor attractions within the Park The table below provides information on the and the need for some parking provision, a Parking modification and implementation of the original Strategy will be commissioned for the Phoenix proposals in the Phoenix Park Transport and Park and surrounding areas in Q4, 2021. Mobility Options Study as a result of the public In addition, a review of the legislation pertaining to consultation. the Bye-laws of the Phoenix Park will be Schematics of the recommended networks are undertaken with regard to the regulation of parking available in Appendix H. with the Park. In conclusion, the Steering Group following detailed consideration of the public’s observations, in tandem with the objectives of the Transport and Mobility Options Study, have refined and formulated a number of proposals within the Study as outlined above for the benefit of all users, both local and national, while maintaining the integrity and unique setting of the Phoenix Park. The implementation of these proposals will be subject to available resources and statutory planning permissions, where appropriate. As the implementation of these proposals develops, further information and updates will be posted on the website (www.phoenixpark.ie), and through other communication outlets. The OPW is committed to continuing engagement with the public on the successful achievement of these proposals to ensure that the conservation and presentation of the Phoenix Park is to international best practice while accommodating access for all.

6 Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Years 0 - 2 Years 1 - 3 Years 3 - 7 Proposal Recommendation Proposal Recommendation Proposal Recommendation Implement Walking It is recommended that projects associated Full implementation Following a review of the Phase 1 Pilot Ashtown Gate This project is postponed until further data and Cycling with walking and cycling improvements of cul-de-sac on Studies, a decision will be made with regard converted to entry is collected and traffic modelling is Strategies in line commence in Quarter 4, 2021. Upper Glen Road to the implementation of these proposals in only. undertaken on the potential impacts to the with an agreed set and one-way the long term. surrounding area and transport of Design system on North infrastructure. OPW, NTA, FCC, and DCC to Principles. Road collaborate on this data collection and traffic modelling.

Implement a 9- The proposed Cul de Sac for the Upper Glen Cabra Gate Conduct a review of the pilot scheme and Cul-de-sac on Further data collection and traffic month pilot study of Road will proceed on a pilot basis subject converted to bus- final decision to be made on the Knockmaroon Road. modelling is to be undertaken. cul-de-sacs on to data collection and review. The cul de only gate implementation of the permanent scheme. North Road and sac on the North Road will not be permanently. Upper Glen Road proceeding. As a result of the feedback with simultaneous received during the consultation, the North data collection and Road proposal will now be piloted as a one- monitoring way route from Cabra Gate to Garda HQ, i.e. programme. West to East. A level of cark parking will be maintained on the North Road. This will allow for comprehensive studies to be undertaken and reviewed. Both of these to take place in Q4 2021.

Implement interim Cabra Gate converted to bus-only for pilot Introduce bus To be rolled out in line with the decision Undertake review Review Transport and Mobility Options bus service as a bus service. This pilot bus service will service and above. and update of the Study in 5 years. pilot study linking commence in Q1 2022, subject to funding. associated traffic Transport and the Park to Heuston management/bus Mobility Options and Broombridge priority measures. Study. Stations.

Introduction of OPW to work with An Garda Síochána and 30km/h speed limit. related bodies with regard to the implementation of this measure.

Develop a Parking Both will commence in Q4 2021. Implementation of Recommendations to be rolled out. Strategy and recommendations Review of Bye- of the Parking laws. Strategy and introduction of updated Bye-laws.

A range of projects as outlined above will commence in Q4 2021. Evidenced based data will be refined with a view to implementing initiatives as per the phasing recommended above.

7 Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Proposed Gate & Road Impacts Briefly outlined below are the proposed arrangements with regard to gates and roads in the Phoenix Park.

Vehicular Gate Pre Covid Arrangements Post Public Consultation Impacts Parkgate Street Two Way None Islandbridge Exit Only None Chapelizod Entry Only None Knockmaroon Two Way None Whites (beside Farmleigh) Closed None Castleknock Two Way None Ashtown Two Way Deferred Cabra Two Way Bus Only in Phase 2 Funeral/Grangegorman Closed None North Circular Two Way None

Roads Pre Covid Arrangements Post Public Consultation Impacts Upper Glen Road Two Way Cul de Sac North Road Two Way One Way All other Roads Various arrangements None

8 Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

1 | Introduction

The Phoenix Park is an important location for  the Park is for people to enjoy its amenities and biodiversity, recreation and home to several The Phoenix Park is located at the western edge of attractions, that we will protect the biodiversity & important institutions and visitor attractions.It is Dublin City Centre, just north of the River Liffey. The landscape fabric of the Park, used by large numbers of people and is also a  parkland extends to over 700ha and is enclosed by that we will encourage more sustainable ways to heavily trafficked route between the centre of the 11km of perimeter wall. It is a historic natural and access the Park and seek to reduce commuter cultural landscape of significant international city and outlying suburbs. In recent decades, the traffic, growth of Dublin has significantly altered the  that we will liaise with a wide range of interested importance. position and use of the Park and affected its role parties and ensure all decisions are evidence-

and potential. Moreover, growing environmental based. challenges represent both an opportunity and a The Study assessed several options and threat. In addition, the experience in the use of the 1.1 General recommended a preferred option. This preferred Park during the COVID-19 pandemic has The Chief Executive Officers in the National option makes several key recommendations emphasised the importance of the Park as a Transport Authority (NTA) and the Office of Public including the following | Works (OPW), working in association with Dublin welcoming amenity.  Prioritise pedestrian infrastructure including the local authorities Fingal County Council (FCC), The COVID-19 pandemic and associated upgrade of over 7km of footpaths along with Dublin City Council (DCC), formed the Phoenix Park Government restrictions/guidelines were in effect strategic pedestrian crossing points on Transport and Mobility Steering Group in mid-2020 during this period, and the public consultation Chesterfield Avenue and other key locations (see Figure 1.1). They aimed to develop a coherent format was adapted to ensure compliance with the throughout the Park, including the Gate framework to help shape and inform a vision for guidelines and restrictions. how visitors will access, experience, and move entrances.  within the Phoenix Park while protecting its Expand and upgrade the cycle network within the Park and linkages to the external networks to character and biodiversity, and enhancing the overall visitor experience. facilitate all cycling users. This will involve the creation of 14km of new cycle lanes and the The Steering Group is supported by a Working upgrade of over 17km of existing cycle lanes Group comprising officials from the OPW, the NTA, Figure 1-1 | Member organisations forming the Phoenix within the Park and at Park entrances. DCC, FCC and external experts who worked in Park Transport and Mobility Steering Group  Traffic will be reduced on the North Road and the collaboration to develop a framework to help shape Upper Glen Road to improve the amenities in and inform a vision for how visitors will access, 1.2 The Phoenix Park Transport and these areas. In the medium to long term, the experience and move within the Phoenix Park while Mobility Options Study vehicular restriction will be introduced at Cabra, protecting its character and biodiversity, and thus The Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Ashtown, and Knockmaroon Gates. enhancing the overall visitor experience. Jacobs Study is based on overarching Movement  In the short to medium term, a bus service will be Engineering Ireland Ltd (Jacobs) was Principles | introduced for Dublin Zoo and the Phoenix Park commissioned to progress the transport and Visitor Centre, serving all areas along this route mobility options study and the public consultation and linking to Heuston Station and Broombridge on the findings. Luas Station.

9 Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

 The speed limit will be set at 30km/h with a 1.4 Public Consultation review of parking provisions and bylaws being The public consultation period ran from 29th recommended. January 2021 until a formal closing date of 12th  It is recommended that the traffic restrictions March 2021. To generate awareness of and proposed for the upper Glen Road and the North participation in the consultation, a wide range of Road be piloted along with traffic data collection communication tools were used to promote the in the short term. consultation. These communication tools are detailed in Section 4 (Publicising the Public 1.3 Consultation Objectives Consultation) of this report. The objectives for this non-statutory public It is noted that a detailed description of the consultation were | Principles which provided the overarching  To provide an opportunity to give information guidance and context for the development of the about the project and to explain the methodology Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Study is and approach to the selection of the Preferred provided in the draft Phoenix Park Transport and Options Mobility Options Study. It was available to  To provide an opportunity for the members of the download on the project website public and other interested parties to engage with (www.phoenixpark.ie), and to view at the Visitors the process and to share with the Project Team Centre in the Phoenix Park by appointment. any relevant supporting information that should Feedback from this non-statutory public be considered consultation has been reviewed and considered by  To further develop relationships with the Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Study communities and key stakeholders and to Working & Steering Groups. The Team is facilitate information sharing for this and future committed to continuing engagement with Phases of the project stakeholders and hopes that this process will  To encourage members of the public to engage foster a better understanding and appreciation of directly with the project via the project website, the complexities of the Phoenix Park, where the project email, and the online public successive generations have toiled and where consultation experience current generation enjoy its wonderful amenities.  To ensure that the Phoenix Park Project Team is viewed as a single and accurate source of information  To ensure consultation and engagement is carried out in a transparent and meaningful way, despite the restrictions posed by COVID-19.

The methods used to achieve these objectives are outlined in Section 3 (Informing the Public) of this report.

10 Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

2 | Approach to Public Consultation

2.2 Providing Opportunities to Examples of social media posts can be found in Appendix F. The public consultation period took place during Maximise Stakeholder Engagement the COVID-19 pandemic, and associated The Project Team is aware that accessibility and Media Spokesperson | Throughout the public government restrictions/guidelines were in effect inclusivity are important when engaging with its consultation period, a spokesperson was available during this period. The Project Team sought stakeholders. Therefore, numerous methods of for interviews with the media to ensure that the feedback on the draft Phoenix Park Transport and engagement for stakeholders were provided to public consultation process was widely publicised. Mobility Options Study which was presented to the facilitate consultation during the public 2.2.1 Consultation Briefings public through this public consultation process. consultation periods. In response to COVID-19 During the six-week public consultation period, restrictions at the time of the consultation, a virtual several briefings were carried out by the Project room was made available on the Phoenix Park Team to explain the preferred options to (https |//phoenixpark.ie/) and Government website stakeholders located within and external to the 2.1 Project Timeline and (www.gov.ie/opw), to allow stakeholders and the Phoenix Park. In addition, a series of briefings were Feedback Forms general public to view maps and project held with elected representatives to allow for the The public consultation period ran for six weeks information, and to submit their feedback in a safe dissemination of accurate information. The OPW in from 29th January 2021 until a formal closing date and accessible environment. The virtual room association with the NTA, and two Dublin local of 12th March 2021. During this time a traditional allowed the user to examine and view project authorities (FCC, DCC) issued an invitation to their and digital media campaign was carried out. In information boards and an introductory video, Elected Members and Oireachtas Members to addition, 12 online ‘in-person’ meetings were held which provided the look and feel of a traditional attend a consultation briefing on the Phoenix Park consultation event. with stakeholder groups. Transport and Mobility Options Study. These online The Project Team developed a feedback form Traditional Media | Press releases were issued to ‘in-person’ meetings in a controlled environment, designed to seek feedback on the preferred local print media and several media channels were allowed elected and local authority members to options, although stakeholders were welcome to used to publicise the public consultation such as discuss queries with the Project Team in a safe submit comments and information in other radio, online media, email alerts, and posters in the manner, which followed the Government COVID-19 formats if preferred. The feedback form can be Phoenix Park to publicise the public consultation. Guidelines. More information on Media can be found in Section viewed in Appendix A. The public consultation information was presented, 4.1. If visitors to the virtual room wanted to provide including the information brochure, the project further general information on visitor usage of the Digital Media | Digital communications were also display maps, and the public consultation feedback Park a visitor’s survey was also available to employed using messages on Twitter, Facebook, forms, and the online consultation experience. complete online. The information gathered from as well as through the Phoenix Park website. These Those in attendance were advised of the various this survey is outlined in Appendix B. communication methods were used to maximise ways stakeholders could engage with the Project engagement with the general public and Team. Further details can be found in Chapter 4. A project timeline graphic was developed to stakeholders and to encourage a high level and illustrate the proposed three-phased diverse range of submissions and project implementation strategy as shown in Figure 2.1. awareness.

11 Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Figure 2.1 | This graphic represents the timeline of the Study.

12 Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

3 | Informing the Public

Key features of the Online Public Consultation Project information channels were developed to Experience included | provide details on the Phoenix Park Transport and  Access from any computer, smartphone, or tablet Mobility Options Study, promote public 24 hours a day. The software for the experience consultation, and facilitate feedback from the was specifically developed to provide smooth public. These channels are outlined in more detail access across a low bandwidth internet in this section. connection to maximise the accessibility of this facility to individuals

 Easy to navigate – enter and follow the numbered Figure 3.2 | Online Public Consultation Experience - One posters, or roam around as you wish aspect view within the virtual room showing the  Click on information displays with the option of information boards labelled by number and interactive 3.1 Online Consultation Experience map. The Phoenix Park Project Team developed a virtual zooming in for a closer look room, which was accessible via the government  The material could be downloaded or printed 3.1.1 Welcome video website (www. gov.ie/opw) and the Park’s website  Leave comments in a feedback form The virtual room also included a short introductory (www.phoenixpark.ie), alongside more traditional  An Interactive Map to access the preferred video from Patrick O’Donovan, T.D, Minister for methods. options within the Park Office of Public Works, where information on the  The landing page gave instructions on how to use non-statutory public consultation process and the The virtual room was developed to have the look the room/ how to access information offline or Study, was provided. and feel of being at a traditional public consultation fill in the feedback form without entering the Minister O’Donovan provided a familiar face to open day, whilst being accessible from the comfort room. and safety of the user’s own home. It provided an welcome visitors to the room and the authority, to introductory video and a virtual room to allow the reassure visitors that their feedback would be user to examine and view information at the user’s taken into consideration. Figure 3-3 shows a still leisure. from the welcome video. The visitor was able to view information such as project need, Steering Group Movement Principles, Mobility Study sustainable objectives, maps of the preferred options in both static and interactive format, access a link to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), submit feedback forms and Figure 3.1 | The landing page for the visitor before contact the Phoenix Park Project Team. entering the virtual room giving instructions and an option to download information. The virtual room can be accessed via this link https |//phoenixpark.virtualeventspace.io/archivedves/ Figure 3.3 | A still from the Welcome Video with Minister O’Donovan.

13 Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Figure 3.4 | The interactive map showing the legend on the right-hand side with options to add details such as proposed bus route, Figure 3.5 | Example of the Phoenix Park website cycle paths and access gates. showing public consultation details. The project email address was advertised and 3.1.2 Interactive map The website was updated with the Public included in the public consultation information Consultation information on the Preferred Options An Interactive Map was developed as part of the brochures and general project publicity. The email virtual room and was provided as one of the on the 29th January 2021. A sample of the website address continues to be monitored and queries page during the public consultation is provided in information boards within the virtual room. This and comments received continue to be dealt with Interactive Map provided an efficient way for a Figure 3-5 below. The website contained links to even though this public consultation period has member of the public to quickly locate their the Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options concluded. property or landmark within the Park and its Study, information brochures, and virtual room. It location concerning the Preferred Options. detailed contact opportunities with an email Members of the public could select the features to address and a Freepost address. 3.4 Information Brochures view such as pedestrian pathways or access gates. The public consultation information brochures A screenshot of the Interactive Map is shown in 3.3 Project Email provided information on the Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study and details of Figure 3-4. A dedicated Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility the six-week consultation process. The brochure Options Study email address was made available 3.2 Websites was available to download from the websites and at [email protected]. The project email The Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options virtual room. Irish Language versions of the was used to receive feedback forms through the Study containing the Preferred Option was documentation were also made available. Copies public consultation process, and to respond to any available at www.phoenixpark.com and for the of the English and Irish language versions of the queries where appropriate. period of consultation on the www.gov.ie/opw . public consultation information brochures are provided in Appendix C of this report.

14 Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

4 | Publicising the Public Consultation

4.2 Online and Social Media 4.4 Phoenix Park Gates A variety of methods were used to provide Notices of the public consultation period and Signs were placed throughout the Phoenix Park information and publicise the project. A mixture of events were published on the OPW Facebook and containing information relating to the public online and traditional media was used to allow Twitter social media channels, and reminders of consultation. The posters were located at all Gates stakeholders to access information. the consultation closing dates were posted in the into the Park and were available in Irish and English days leading up to the close of the consultation. languages. Sample online and social media content can be 4.1 Local Media viewed in Appendix F. Press media | Coverage of the launch of the public 4.3 Phoenix Park Stakeholders consultation featured in local and national press Emails were sent to all internal stakeholders in the during the week of the 30th January. The Phoenix Park on the 12th January 2021 advising newspaper adverts contained a description of the them of the consultation and that presentations project and details of the public consultation were available if they required them. Presentations format. They also gave details of the project were made to the organisations listed in Table 4.1. website and gave instructions on how to make a Table 4.1 | The dates of meetings and the corresponding submission. The advert (Irish version) can be organisations. viewed in Appendix D. Newspaper adverts were Date of meeting Organisation th placed in the Irish Times (30th January), Evening 13 January Government Presentations th Herald (30th January), Fingal Independent (2nd 15 January Government Presentations 20th January Dublin Zoo & An Garda Síochána March), and Dublin People | Southside (Dublin Castle & ‘K’ District) People/Northside People (3rd March). 21st January US Embassy & St Mary Hospital Radio campaign | A series of radio adverts were Complex th aired on FM 104, 98 FM and Spin 103.8 radio 28 January Minister & OPW Chairman th stations. The adverts ran over several periods for 4 February TDs & Elected Representatives 5th February Bloom, Bord Bia example FM104 provided the following | 9th February Dublin City Council Central Area  Between Tuesday 2nd March – Wednesday 10th Committee & Heritage Council of March | 45 spots Ireland th  Thursday 11th March | 3 spots 17 February Dublin City Council South Central Area Committee A selection of media coverage can be viewed in 25th February Fingal County Council, Blanchard- Appendix E of this Report. stown/Mulhuddart/Castle- Figure 4.1 | Photograph showing posters erected on an knock/Ongar Area Committee entrance gate in the Phoenix Park giving details in Irish th 5 March Garda Headquarters and English of the public consultation. 15th March Fáilte Ireland

15 Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

5 | Feedback and Submissions Overview

Points raised by the organisations and individuals are anonymous within the report to ensure SUBMISSION THEMES The following section provides an overview of the confidentiality. This report is intended to set out feedback and submissions received during the

how the public consultation process was managed, 40.7% public consultation period. All submissions how many people interacted with the project, and received by post, online, email, or at a meeting summarise the issues and concerns raised during the consultation period were recorded for 30.5% throughout the public consultation process. All consideration by the Project Team. The project received most responses from private individuals, submissions were acknowledged and considered 94 responses came from Organisations and 28 as part of this consultation process.

from Resident Associations. A list of the Table 5.1 | Summary of the volume of submissions 16.3% Organisations, Elected Representatives and received by type.

Residents Associations who shared their Number of 9.5% Submissions Type organisation names in the submission can be Submissions found in Appendix G. 3.0% Feedback Form Submissions 1,293

Postal Submissions 23 Email Submissions 978 5.1 Introduction Total Submissions 2,294 The public consultation period was undertaken for six weeks from Friday 29th January 2021 until The information and comments received in the Friday 12th March 2021. Submissions were invited submissions were categorised into common via the following channels. Public Transport ‘themes’, and these are presented in the Chapters Walking and Cycling  By Freepost below. The themes and associated chapters are OtherConsiderations

 By email listed below | Access,Gates and Roads  By feedback form through the Online Public  Chapter 6 | Walking and Cycling Public Consultation Process Consultation Experience  Chapter 7 | Public Transport  By verbal feedback to the Project Team at the in-  Chapter 8 | Access, Gates and Roads 5.2 Review of Engagement from person meetings.  Chapter 9 | Other Considerations Online Feedback  The Project Team received 2,294 formal Chapter 10 | Public Consultation Process The virtual room consultation received a total of submissions in total during the public consultation An overview of the popularity of the themes 6,938 unique visitors, the average duration spent in period. The majority of submissions received were mentioned in the submissions received is the room was 2.43 minutes. The majority of from private individuals, however, a number of illustrated in the graph. visitors used their mobile phones (4,387 users), submissions were received from this was followed by a computer device (2,269 groups/organisations. users), with a small number of tablet users (282 users).

16 Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

5.2.1 Profile of Stakeholder Respondents were asked to detail the age group WHERE ARE RESPONDENTS Respondents were asked to provide some they belonged to. There were 1,293 responses to BASED? information about themselves and were asked in this question. The results show a wide variety of

what capacity were they making a submission. age groups, the majority of respondents were from 24%

There were 1,131 responses to this question, the the 30-39, 40-49, and 50-64 age groups. The 23% majority of respondents identified as being a number of respondents aged between 50-64 and member of the public or a resident. 65 and over, was over 30%.

Respondents were asked to identify their home 16% WHO RESPONDED TO locations from a list giving Dublin postcodes CONSULTATION adjacent to Phoenix Park, local authority areas, and

counties outside Dublin if relevant. 12% 45.0% AGE OF RESPONDENT 7% 7% 35.4% 5% 30% 4% 3% 27% 22% 12.1% 9% 8%

3% Dublin 7 | DCC | 7 Dublin DCC | 8 Dublin 2% All Other Other All Areas DublinFCC | 15 2.1% DublinDCC | 20 1.6% 1.5% 1.2% 0.5% 0.4% Dublin City Council Dublin 24 29 39 49 64 - - - - - Fingal County Council 15 25 30 40 50 Other Council School South Dublin County Council County Dublin South Commuter Organisation 65 65 AND OVER Dun Laoghaire Rathdown County Local resident 5.2.2 Current Use of Park PREFER NOT TO SAY

Group A series of questions were asked to determine the Member of theMember Public of Public Representative Worker in Phoenix Park Of the respondents, the majority came from Dublin respondent’s familiarity with Phoenix Park, how 7, Dublin 15 and Dublin City Council area. Of the they utilise the Park and how often they visit the respondents living outside Dublin, the counties Park. When asked how frequently respondents Meath and Leinster had fifteen respondents each, visited the Park currently, most responses

Residents Association/Community Residents followed by Kildare (14), Wicklow (9), Munster (5), indicated daily or several times a week or 59% of Connaught (4), Ulster (1), and Other (63). the respondents.

17 Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

It is significant to note that of those who travel to CURRENT USE OF PARK TRAVEL TO THE PARK the Phoenix Park, just over 30% travel by car, 30% cycle while 30% walk. At present, only 6% avail of public transport while accessing the Phoenix Park. 34%

24% HOW DO YOU TRAVEL TO PARK 22% 25% 31% 31% 15% 30% 13% 11% 13% 8% 8% 8% 8% 3% 2% 1% 1% 1%

2% 1%

Other Other Daily Forexercise Once a year Once a week I work in I the Park Igo on familyoutings For visitor For attractions Onceevery month Socialising with with friends Socialising Several times a year Several times a week Visiting other institutions institutions other Visiting I use the parking facilities facilities parking the use I Several times a month

From the analysis of submissions received on why people travelled to the Phoenix Park, 85% of 3% respondents go to the Phoenix Park to use the Availof the outdoor amenitiesofpark 2% amenities, visit attractions, socialise with friends or 2% for outdoor exercise. Only 8% of respondents 1% indicated that they used the Phoenix Park as a commuter route. While 1% of respondents who are VisitingSt. Mary's Hositpal or CaraCheshire Home BUS CAR

employed within the Park, some 3% of respondents LUAS WALK I travel through the Park on my to another desination desination another to my on Park the through travel I TRAIN CYCLE use it for parking. OTHER

18 Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

5.2.3 Responses relating to the Transport and DO YOU SUPPORT THE Questions Percentages Mobility Options Study MOVEMENT PRINCIPLES OF Respondents were asked if they supported the The study makes THE PHOENIX PARK provision for greatly movement principles of the Study. The principles TRANSPORT AND MOBILITY enhanced walking and No were listed, and the respondent had the option to OPTIONS STUDY? cycling facilities in the 17% indicate a Yes or a No for each one. Park.

The responses were overwhelmingly in favour of Yes No Do you agree with this Yes the principles. The highest agreement was 95.5% objective? 83 for ‘The Park is for People’. The lowest in favour % but still at 72.4% was for the principle ‘We will seek We will protect and conserve the to reduce commuter through traffic’. Biodiversity and historic landscape 91.50% 8.50% Respondents were asked a series of four questions fabric of the Phoenix Park roads are primarily on specific aspects of the Study. The questions Park for people visiting and and responses are detailed below. A large majority working in Phoenix No of respondents agreed with enhanced walking and Park. 26 cycling facilities in the Park. The Park is for People 95.50% 4.50% % Do you agree? The majority of respondents agreed that the roads Yes were for visitors and people employed within the 74% Park. The majority of respondents agreed to a We will encourage the public bus service to make the Park more use of more accessible. sustainable ways to 83.10% 16.90% access the Park When asked if the access and road The Study makes recommendations worked for the Park as a We will liaise and provision for the routing destination, respondents were almost evenly split consult with of public bus service No interested and through the Park in between Yes, No, and Partially. 72% of respondents relevant parties and 22 90.40% 9.40% order to make the Park stated that the recommendations partially or fully organisations in the % as widely accessible to worked for them. achievement of these principles the public as possible Yes by providing a direct 78% We will seek to reduce link to key attractions commuter through 72.40% 27.60% and to link with other traffic public transport services such as the train, Luas and other buses to provide We will make connections to the evidence- based 88.80% 11.20% wider Dublin area. decisions Do you agree with this objective?

19 Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Do the access and road A submission was only judged to be positive if this recommendations, was explicitly stated and/or there were only work for you and positive comments relating to the preferred option. Phoenix Park as a Partially The privacy rights were respected throughout the destination? 33% Yes consultation period. Any personal information 38% submitted was treated securely and confidentially in accordance with the Data Protection Acts 1988- No 2018 and the General Data Protection Regulation 29% (GDPR). By partaking in this survey, respondents give the OPW permission to analyse and include responses in our results.

Following the close of the consultation period all Further information provided in open text sections submissions were collated and analysed. A coding of the feedback form was analysed and is process to analyse information to provide a summarised by theme in the chapters following. balanced analysis of the views expressed in consultation responses was used. This was joined 5.3 Written Submissions with quantitative analysis of closed questions. In Nine hundred and thirty eight email submissions combination, this analysis provides a picture of the were received through the project email address. views expressed by respondents. The quantity of information written in the emails varied greatly. Some respondents provided detailed assessments of the Options Study and included documents such as maps or diagrams as attachments. All of the information was analysed and is summarised by theme in the chapters following. While a direct application on whether an agreement with the movement principles/preferred option could not be quantified in the same way as the feedback forms, an analysis of sentiment was carried out. A submission was judged to be negative towards the preferred option if this was explicitly stated and/or if there were one or more points raised against one part of the preferred option. A submission was judged to be neutral if there was no statement of agreement or disagreement and there were positive and negative points about the preferred option.

20 Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

6 | Walking and Cycling There were 969 mentions under the walking and  Respondents asked that consideration be given 6.4 Cycle Path and Facilities | cycling theme. The main points raised in this to reduced mobility visitors. 27.2% of Responses section included | This graph shows the breakdown Respondents commented on cycling proposals. of the 969 responses under the walking and cycling 6.2 Alternatives comments on The following gives an overview | theme. walking and cycling proposals |  Numerous respondents supported the WALKING AND CYCLING 11.7% of Responses improvement and increase of cycle paths in the Respondents commented on alternatives for Park. walking and cycling proposals. The following gives  Facilities for bike parking was raised by several 27.2% 25.7% 23.7% an overview | respondents, in particular close to Dublin Zoo and  A number of alternative routes suggested linking the Visitor Centre. existing paths and walks to connections outside  The North Road cycle lane was noted for upgrade of the Park. due to ongoing parking. 11.8% 11.7%  A number of submissions asked for consideration be given to linking to external 6.5 Health and Safety |

6.0% routes outside the Park such as the new bridge 11.8% of Responses proposed for the Irish National War Memorial Respondents commented on cycling proposals. Gardens and also cycle links to the canals and The following gives an overview | Dublin Docklands proposals.  There was a strong emphasis on the safety of the  Requested access to traditional routes and trails cycle paths with respondents requesting several will continue to be available for running events, criteria be met such as larger cycle lanes on main clubs and runners. roads with permanent dividers, segregation from Alternatives Facilities Facilities pedestrians and smoother cycle surfaces.

General 6.3 Pedestrian Walkway | CyclePath and  Respondents requested segregation from traffic Accessand Gates Healthand Saftey 25.7% of Responses and highlighted the hazards of not segregating Pedestrian Walkway Pedestrian Walking and Cycling Respondents commented on pedestrian proposals. cyclists and pedestrians. The following gives an overview |  The lack of sufficient lighting for cyclists, walkers 6.1 General Comments on Walking  Majority supported improved and expanded and runners was referenced for Tower Road and Cycling Proposals | pathways for pedestrians. (Fingal County Council) and North Road (Phoenix  23.7% of Responses Requested more pedestrian crossings, some Park). Many respondents commented generally on the requested pedestrian crossings or zebra It should be noted that many respondents noted walking and cycling proposals. The following gives crossings at main roads and where junctions an overview | occur. that Phoenix Park is the green lung of Dublin and that through traffic should be removed or reduced  A large number of respondents expressed  Requested improved entrances and exits from positivity for the proposals for cyclists and the walking lanes with clear marking. to allow for the improvement of biodiversity.  pedestrians. Requested better access for wheelchair and disability users on pathways.

21 Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

7 | Public Transport There were 566 mentions relating to public 7.1 General comments on Public 7.2 Alternatives | transport. The main points raised in this section 25.1% of Responses included | Transport Proposals | 67% of Responses Many respondents requested more public transport  Stakeholders expressed support for the bus route The following gives an overview of the transport options external to the Park. The following gives an and requested more public transport links both proposal | overview of the alternatives suggested external to internal and external to the Park. the Park |  Many stakeholders requested that public  Respondents stated that the proposed bus route  Extend the 46A route and newly proposed S2 to transport within the Park be more efficient and would only benefit those on the current bus or enter the Park. affordable. Luas route.  Link the bus from Heuston Station and the  Public transport needs to improve access for  Several stakeholders suggested that a wider Broombridge Luas through the Park tunnel. everyone, including those with mobility inhibiting review of public transport across Dublin is  Park and Ride on St. Bricin’s site or along disabilities. required to balance the capacity of the service with the potential reductions in commuter traffic. Cunningham Road. This graph shows the breakdown of the 566   Improved access to efficient and affordable bus Link the city centre through Phoenix Park to mentions under the public transport theme. services. Blanchardstown.   Many stated that incentives, discounts or even A bus that runs the length of Chesterfield Avenue PUBLIC TRANSPORT free tickets should be used to promote the use of and links up with Castleknock village.  the bus service. Extend the Luas on Parkgate Street up  Some stakeholders who take part in competitions Chesterfield Avenue which should terminate at 67.0% or events in Phoenix Park throughout the year are the Phoenix Monument.  concerned about the bus route impacting these Many stakeholders suggested an internal bus activities. service. The bus service should include a bus  Many stakeholders suggested that tour buses stop near Ratra House and next to Farmleigh & should form part of the overall bus service so that Castleknock gates and public transport should service St. Mary’s Hospital/Cheshire House and 25.1% all routes are accessible to everyone. Farmleigh House & Estate.

Several submissions went into detail on the  Many stakeholders noted the importance of 6.7% appearance of the bus, requesting that buses disability-friendly buses such as shuttle buses. 1.2% should have low engine noise and low emissions, Several respondents requested a climate-friendly be single-decker and accessible to all users, and electric bus. Additionally, stakeholders requested without commercial advertising on the outside to large amounts of storage on buses to keep with Park decorum. accommodate buggies and wheelchairs, etc.  Some stakeholders also noted they would be Alternatives Alternatives General more willing to use public transport services if Journey Times pets were allowed on board, as the park is where Public Transport Access and Gates they exercise their animals.

22 Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

7.3 Access | 6.7% of Responses The most common theme was that bus links to the Park need to be improved to allow access to everyone.  Improved accessibility for people with disabilities.  Many stakeholders noted they would avoid bus services if they were traveling with children to avoid stress.  Several stakeholders commented on the closure of gates to accommodate the bus service.  Some residents raised concern that access would be impeded if Cabra Gate is bus-only.  Others questioned Cabra gates' suitability for buses.  Others asked if it is worth the disruption if the bus service only runs once every 20 to 30 minutes. 7.4 Journey Times | 1.2% of Responses Current journey times are deemed too long so travelling to the park via car is seen as the only alternative.  Bus links to the Park need to be improved to allow access to everyone.  Individuals noted journey time either on the bus or to the bus stop would take too long.  Some stated private cars impact bus schedules so journey times increase in rush hours and have a knock-on effect on the rest of the journey.  Additionally, taking several buses to the park would be time-consuming.

23 Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

8 | Access, Gates and Roads There were 2,423 mentions under the access and 8.1 General Comments on Access 8.3 Impacts on Communities | roads theme. The main points raised in this section 4% of Responses included | and Roads Proposals | 25.9% of Responses Many respondents commented on the impacts on  The objective to prioritise sustainable transport Many respondents commented generally on the communities. The following gives an overview | over private cars was generally supported. access and roads proposals. The following gives  Several submissions raised concerns about  Several submissions raised concerns about an overview | potential traffic impacts on local residential potential impacts on local residents. areas.  The majority of comments were regarding the  The objective to prioritise sustainable transport  Several submissions expressed concerns over Castleknock and Knockmaroon gates. (It should over private cars was generally supported. potential impacts on local school communities in be noted that there is no proposal to close or  The retention of Chesterfield Avenue as a main particular St Laurence’s National School and restrict access through the Castleknock Gate.) arterial route out of the city was emphasised. Mount Sackville School.  Many respondents welcomed the plan to reduce  Respondents mentioned activities in the Park that  A number of neighbourhoods submitted opinions motor traffic through the Park but stated that required 24hr access and the potential increased on the potential impacts on their communities. reduction in parking should be associated with time spent on necessary journeys for staff. Positive impacts were predicted for Kilmainham this.  A small number of submissions recommended providing infrastructure at the gates such as and Inchicore and communities adjacent to the This graph shows the breakdown of the 2,423 information booths and way finding. northern and western sides of the Park such as responses under the access, gates and roads Castleknock, Cabra and Chapelizod express theme. 8.2 Alternatives | positive and negative opinions. 4.2% of Responses  A large number of submissions raised concerns ACCESS AND ROADS Many respondents submitted alternatives to the on the potential exacerbation of a traffic and parking issues in the neighbourhood in Cabra, proposals. The following gives an overview of the 25.9% Chapelizod and Castleknock. 23.6% alternatives submitted | 21.2% 21.2%  Several respondents stated that the communities  Speed cameras for traffic control and revenue for in West/North Dublin have no realistic alternative the Park.  Automatic barrier technology for commercial but to commute to work through the Park. 4.2% 4.0% delivery traffic that is supervised by the OPW was 8.4 Gates | suggested to restrict the presence of fast moving through traffic. 23.6% of Responses  To facilitate reduction of traffic through the Park Many respondents made comments with regard to the widening of the Navan road or Blackhorse the gate proposals. A summary of comments is

Parking Avenue was suggested and a working partnership given below, the majority were regarding the Limit Castleknock and Knockmaroon gates.

Alternatives with Dublin City Council was suggested. Impact on General

Communities  Traffic/Speed  A small number of submissions suggested a new Many respondents pointed to recent closures of pedestrian gate be established between Ashtown gates as an opportunity to gather information on Accessand Roads Accessand Gates and Castleknock gates. effects of restricted access.

24 Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Castleknock Gate Ashtown Gate 8.6 Parking |  Many submissions expressed concern at the  Some respondents raised concerns about 21.2% of Responses closure of Castleknock Gate and the potential potential impacts on the surrounding environs, Many respondents commented on parking impact such changes will have on surrounding external to the Park in particular areas close to proposals. The following gives an overview | areas such as an increase in traffic volumes on the North Road and Castleknock Gate. the Blackhorse Avenue, Castleknock Road and  A few comments on the Ashtown Gate related to  Many respondents welcomed the plan to reduce Village. (It should be noted that there is no the potential impact on horse traffic. motor traffic through the Park but stated that the proposal to close or restrict access at reduction in parking should be associated with Cabra Gate Castleknock Gate). this.  Suggestions included retaining access for locals.  The restrictions at Castleknock Gate were not  The lack of parking capacity was repeated in seen to benefit Dublin 15 residents. (It should be Whites Gate submissions, resulting in the parking of cars on noted that there is no proposal to close or restrict  Some respondents stated internal Park traffic grass verges, pedestrian paths, cycle paths and access at Castleknock Gate). would be reduced if this gate allowed traffic to on the road. Farmleigh.  Lack of sufficient parking provision in the vicinity Knockmaroon Gate  Whites Gate was put forward as an example of of Dublin Zoo was raised.  Several submissions requested that how change has been accepted, as it has been  Submissions requested greater enforcement of Knockmaroon gate remain open to traffic. closed for many years. parking rules including vehicles being clamped or Respondents stated that it was used to access towed and to discourage ‘park and ride’ behaviour the Park, to go to and from work. Parkgate Street Gate by motorists.  Several submissions raised concerns at the  Respondents stated that closing peripheral gates  Some submissions outlined enhanced parking potential impacts in Chapelizod village and would cause an increase in traffic through options such as more spaces and priority given to Castleknock village, delays in getting to Parkgate Street. (It should be noted that there is disabled parking, parking for elderly or reduced Carpenterstown, congestion on Whites Road, and no proposal to close or restrict access at this mobility and include drop off locations. A variety congestion on Tower Road affecting Mount Gate). in parking options was suggested, in particular Sackville School traffic. for Dublin Zoo visitors

8.5 Traffic/Speed Limit |  The relative cost of parking was described in Chapelizod Gate 21.2% of Responses submissions such as parking fees, parking  meters, tolls for cars and compared to the cost of A few comments with regard to the Chapelizod Many respondents commented on traffic and tickets for a family on public transport. Gate raised the potential impact this would have speed limit proposals. The following gives an on other areas or routes. overview |  A small number of respondents requested that the gate stay open for employees and visitors of  There were mixed views on the proposal to St Mary’s Hospital and requested that the gate be change the speed limit. Of the respondents who two-way. commented, the majority stated that the 30km/h proposed limit was too slow or the current speed Islandbridge Gate was accurate or that a compromise of 40km/h  Regarding Islandbridge Gate some respondants should be enforced initially. suggested it be opened for two-way traffic.  A lower number of respondents welcomed the proposals to reduce the speed limit.

25 Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

9 | Other Considerations There were 1,817 responses under the Other 9.1 General Comments | 9.3 Use of Park Considerations theme. The topics covered were | 18.8% of Responses 51.2% of Responses  General comments Many respondents made general comments on Many respondents commented on additional uses  Park Gates other considerations. The following gives an of the Park. The following gives an overview |  Use of the Park overview |  A large number of submissions requested more  People and the Park  Many requested educational information be facilities for users of the Phoenix Park such as  Evidence based decisions placed around the Park, topics included history of accessible toilets. There was a request to supply  Community impacts the Park and biodiversity. street furniture throughout the Park also.  COVID-19  Some requested other amenities such as shops  A number of respondents requested that any new  Biodiversity and restaurants in the Park. Some could be signage or lighting be in keeping with current  Implementation. temporary structures such as horsebox coffee heritage features. companies or food trucks. This graph shows the breakdown of the 1,817  Several respondents requested a dog run within  Ongoing access and increased provisions for responses under the other consideration theme. the Park. exercise groups in the park. Provision for  Respondents requested more music events and alternative sports such as skateboarding and OTHER CONSIDERATIONS markets in the Park. rollerblading.  Those with a disability and those who have

51.5% mobility issues should be represented in the 9.4 People and the Park | plans. 4.2% of Responses  Improved signage, which are also accessible to Many respondents commented on people and the the visually impaired. Park. The following gives an overview |  Dog waste bins and strict fines for owners if they  Several stakeholders stated that the Park fail to pick up after their dogs.

18.8% proposals were targeting local residents rather than the people of Dublin and further afield. 8.8% 8.3% 9.2 Gates |  Some stakeholders asked that the proper 4.2% 2.9% 1.9% 1.7% 1.2%

0.8% 1.2% of Responses provision and access is put in place for elderly Many respondents commented on the gates in this and disabled members of the public. …

19 section in addition to Chapter 8. The following  It was stated that the Park is not just for people it - gives an overview | is for wildlife as well. Saftey Gates People  Others suggested that all gates be closed to  The Park is for everyone who uses it and a Covid Evidence through traffic on the weekends. balanced consideration should be given to all Use Use of Park Biodiversity  Some questioned where the original gates are users while decisions are made.

Implementation and asked when they will be replaced.

 Cyclists asked that gates accommodate bikes as Community impacts OtherConsiderations some don’t allow for this currently.

26 Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

9.5 Evidence-based Decisions | 9.7 Health and Safety | 9.9 Implementation | 0.8% of Responses 1.9% of Responses 8.8% of Responses A few respondents commented under the making Several respondents commented under the Many stakeholders commented on the evidence-based decisions theme. The following health and safety theme. The following gives an implementation process. The following gives gives an overview | overview | an overview |  Several comments supported option 10 and  Improved lighting for public safety.  Many stakeholders requested quicker asked for a trial run to give data on this option.  Private cars need to be restricted within the park implementation of the scheme, especially for  Others asked for more clarity on the evidence- to improve the safety of the public. pedestrian and road sections. based decisions made by the project team.  Increase in Ranger and Garda presence as crime  Others suggested that the plan should be more  The Working Group was asked to be progressive and antisocial behaviour in the Park discourages ambitious and reflect the learnings from the in their decisions to include climate change and some people. COVID-19 pandemic. the impacts of COVID-19 in their decision-making  Bins need to be emptied regularly to comply with  A few noted that now was not the right time to process. Health and Safety standards. implement changes due to COVID-19 and many  Others noted they wanted evidence on how the  Some stakeholders commented more generally asked to keep the Park as it is currently. changes make the Park more sustainable and and noted that Ireland needs to redesign its  Some stakeholders suggested an impact how it encourages guests to use more physical activity and mobility infrastructure to assessment be conducted prior to any changes sustainable transport measures. help combat obesity and related diseases. to assess the impact on vulnerable groups.  Others commented that the public should see the 9.6 Community Impacts | 9.8 COVID-19 | plans from the National Transport Authority, Dublin County Council and Fingal County Council 1.7% of Responses 2.9% of Responses and other transport infrastructure in unison with Several respondents commented under the Several respondents commented under the COVID- that of the Phoenix Park to ensure they are in community impacts theme. The following gives an 19 theme. The following gives an overview| keeping with one another. overview |  COVID-19 has increased the use of the Park for  Greater resources for Park rangers to enforce the  Some asked for specific community plans and recreational purposes. The Park was a refuge for park rules. requested that their area is considered before physical and emotional health during the  Some stakeholders requested that changes to decisions are made. pandemic. the park are reviewed and surveys are conducted  Some requested information on how the road  COVID-19 travel created dangerous parking and to identify goals achieved and identify areas for closures and cul de sacs will impact residents. driving through the park. improvement. Several local areas are currently being used as  In the first lockdown the Park was not used as a car parks, residents asked for this impact to be rat run and it improved the safety and feel of the 9.10 Biodiversity | reduced. park immensely and decreased motor emissions. 8.3% of Responses  Others noted that the same approach and care to  Some asked that changes are not made to the Many respondents commented generally on the the proposals should also be given to Park during COVID-19 and traditional consultation biodiversity proposals. The following gives an communities around the park. with face-to-face meetings should be overview | implemented after COVID-19.  Many noted that the Park was a precious ‘lung for the city’ of Dublin and that this resource needs to be protected.

27 Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

 Several noted the need to remove the through road in the Park to improve biodiversity. This reduction in pollution through the park will positively benefit humans and animals alike.  Many asked that more should be done to stop people feeding the deer and reduce the litter within the Park.  The Park should be rewilded to encourage biodiversity.  A few stakeholders noted there should be education areas to educate people on biodiversity and the environment.  A few stakeholders queried the baseline environmental data for the biodiversity. Others noted that air quality and noise levels should be monitored in the Park.  The submissions welcomed the strives made to improve and preserve the biodiversity in the Park. Respondents stated that a climate emergency and fatal air pollution called for decisive action by leaders.  A large number of respondents noted the importance of protecting the biodiversity in the park. Suggestions were made to further the biodiversity by reducing the deer population, by planting more indigenous trees, replacing felled trees and by allowing wild areas to grow.  Others asked for dedicated zones for deer and flora and fauna, so they are impacted minimally by those that use the park.  A few stakeholders noted that enforcement should be increased to protect deer and other wildlife.

28 Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

10 | Public Consultation Process There were 177 responses relating to the Public 10.1 General comments on the Public 10.2 Engagement comments on the Consultation Process. The main points raised in this section included | Consultation Process | Public Consultation Process | 76.8% of Responses 23.2% of Responses  Many commented on the benefits of using a Many stakeholders commented on the public Many respondents commented on engagement for virtual event space consultation and requested consultation process. The following gives an the Phoenix Park Consultation. The following gives this is used post-COVID-19 in addition to other overview | an overview | mediums.  Others suggested that the virtual room may not  Some commented on the virtual room space and  Several stakeholders noted that many of the be as accessible to the older generation. noted that it was a great way to view the residents were elderly and may struggle to  Improved engagement to residents and workers. information and should be continued after the respond to an online consultation.  People would like to see improvements for pandemic in addition to in-person meetings.  Some respondents suggested more targeted everyone, not just specific groups such as  Others worried that using a virtual room may not engagement for local residents and workers such pedestrians or locals. be as accessible to people over a certain age. as a letter drop, to ensure their responses were  Some stakeholders requested the Study be captured. This graph shows the breakdown of the 177 postponed until meetings could be held and plans  Others suggested that the consultation responses under the Public Consultation Process viewed in-person to ensure accessibility to all. communications seemed to be aimed at local theme.  Changes to the Park should be consulted on with residents rather than the wider Dublin population. the wider community and environment and within  Others commented on the consultation questions PUBLIC CONSULTATION Dublin. and noted they were too binary or leading. PROCESS  Some respondents queried duration of the public  Consulting with women and having more women consultation, especially during the pandemic. in decision-making positions was mentioned to

76.8% Respondents expressed that not enough people ensure their needs are met. were aware that the proposal was subject to a  Several people commented on the consultation public consultation. as a whole and noted that they were grateful for  A number of written submissions stated that the chance to respond to the consultation and for there was limited scope for detailed feedback their opinion to be taken into consideration. and therefore provided more lengthy feedback 23.2% through an email.

Public Public General Engagement Consultation

29 Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

11 | Conclusion and Next Steps

Next Steps Further relevant studies will need to be carried out prior to any expansion of this service in tandem This Post-Consultation Report aims to set out how The information and comments received in the with relevant stakeholders. The introduction of the public consultation process was managed, how submissions were categorised into five common sustainable transport into the Park is in line with many people interacted with the public themes, Walking and Cycling, Access, Gates and consultation, and summarise the issues and Roads, Public Transport, Other Considerations and Government objectives for sustainable travel. concerns raised throughout the public consultation Public Consultation. Just over 40% of the feedback Access, Gates and Roads Proposals process. received was about Access, Gates and Roads. The Some 74% of respondents supported the view that second highest themes was Other Considerations Park roads are primarily for people visiting and which included topics such as park infrastructure, working in the Park. Significant feedback was biodiversity etc. Over 15% of responses was in received regarding Access, Gates and Roads The transparency of the public consultation regard to Walking and Cycling. Public Transport proposals. While the public supported the process is supported by the production of this accounted for just under 10% of the feedback Movement Principles in general, some feedback Post-Consultation Report to demonstrate that the submissions. suggested that traffic congestion may occur, points raised through the submissions received are Walking and Cycling Improvements particular in Castleknock and Chapelizod villages. being recorded and considered. As discussed 83% of respondents supported enhanced walking Accordingly, the Ashtown Gate will remain two-way throughout this report, each submission was and cycling facilities and therefore these proposals in the medium term until further studies are reviewed by the Project Team and the feedback will be advanced in the short to medium term as undertaken. With regard to the proposals to and opinions expressed under the themes as set resources are made available. All entrance Knockmaroon Gate/Road, further data collection out throughout this Report (Chapters 6 – 10) have arrangements will be reviewed to prioritise and traffic modelling is to be undertaken. In been considered. pedestrian and cyclist access, as appropriate to the tandem with the introduction of the pilot bus An important objective of this consultation was to park designations. service, Cabra Gate will convert to a bus only broaden the engagement with stakeholders not Public Transport Proposals exit/entry point. No other gates will be impacted as normally able to attend open day venues by Over 77% of respondents supported the provision a result of the proposals within this study. providing 24-hour access to information. This was of public transport to major visitor attractions The proposed Cul de Sac for the Upper Glen Road facilitated through a virtual room which had almost within the Park. Currently only 6% of the public will proceed on a pilot basis subject to data seven thousand visitors viewing the information. avail of public transport while accessing the collection and review in Phase 1. We will not be The large volume of submissions received during Phoenix Park. The feedback received during the proceeding with the cul de sac on the North Road. the consultation period demonstrated that, despite consultation was broadly supportive of the As a result of the feedback received during the pandemic restrictions, a significant number of the proposed bus route through the Phoenix Parking consultation, the North Road proposal will now be general public expressed their views on the Study linking via the multi-modal transport interchange at piloted as a one-way route from Cabra Gate to and Preferred Options. Heuston Station and Broombridge Station. The Garda HQ, i.e. West to East. NTA will work with the OPW on the implementation of this pilot bus service. These pilot projects will allow for comprehensive studies to be undertaken and reviewed. Car parking will be maintained on the North Road.

30 Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Movement within the Park The Minister and the Steering Group would like to In the interest of public safety, a 30km/h speed thank all members of the public and organisations limit will be introduced within the Phoenix Park. who participated in the consultation process. Concerns were raised with regard to the lack of The table below gives information on the parking within the Park. However, it is noted that implementation and adaptions to the proposals as there are currently in excess of 2,000 surfaced a result of the public consultation. parking spaces spread throughout the park including Farmleigh. Given the high profile of the Schematics of the recommended networks are visitor attractions within the Park and the need for available in Appendix H. some parking provision, a Parking Strategy will be developed to investigate parking provision and controls for the Phoenix Park in Q4, 2021. In addition, a review of the legislation pertaining to the Bye-laws of the Phoenix Park will be undertaken with regard to the regulation of parking with the Park. In conclusion, the Steering Group following detailed consideration of the publics’ observations, in tandem with the objectives of the Transport and Mobility Options Study, have refined the proposals within the Study as outlined above for the benefit of all users, both local and national, while maintaining the integrity and unique setting of the Phoenix Park. The implementation of these proposals will be subject to available resources and statutory planning permissions, where appropriate. As the implementation of these proposals develops, further information and updates will be posted on the website (www.phoenixpark.ie), and through other communication outlets, where applicable. The OPW is committed to continuing engagement with the Steering Group and the public on the successful achievement of these proposals to ensure that the conservation and presentation of the Phoenix Park is to international best practice while accommodating access for all. The Phoenix Park Team will continue to be available to contact by e-mail ([email protected]) or post.

31 Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Years 0 - 2 Years 1 - 3 Years 3 - 7 Proposal Recommendation Proposal Recommendation Proposal Recommendation Implement It is recommended that projects associated Full Following a review of the Phase 1 Pilot Studies, Ashtown Gate This project is postponed until further data is Walking and with walking and cycling improvements implementation of a decision will be made with regard to the converted to collected and traffic modelling is undertaken Cycling commence in Quarter 4, 2021. cul-de-sac on implementation of these proposals in the long entry only. on the potential impacts to the surrounding Strategies in line Upper Glen Road term. area and transport infrastructure. OPW, NTA, with an agreed and one-way FCC, and DCC to collaborate on this data set of Design system on North collection and traffic modelling. Principles. Road Implement a 9- The proposed Cul de Sac for the Upper Glen Cabra Gate Conduct a review of the pilot scheme and final Cul-de-sac on Further data collection and traffic modelling is month pilot study Road will proceed on a pilot basis subject to converted to bus- decision to be made on the implementation of Knockmaroon to be undertaken. of cul-de-sacs on data collection and review. The cul de sac on only gate the permanent scheme. Road. North Road and the North Road will not be proceeding. As a permanently. Upper Glen Road result of the feedback received during the with consultation, the North Road proposal will now simultaneous be piloted as a one-way route from Cabra Gate data collection to Garda HQ, i.e. West to East. A level of cark and monitoring parking will be maintained on the North Road. programme. This will allow for comprehensive studies to be undertaken and reviewed. Both of these to take place in Q4 2021. Implement Cabra Gate converted to bus-only for pilot bus Introduce bus To be rolled out in line with the decision above. Undertake review Review Transport and Mobility Options Study in interim bus service. This pilot bus service will commence service and and update of the 5 years. service as a pilot in Q1 2022, subject to funding. associated traffic Transport and study linking the management/bus Mobility Options Park to Heuston priority measures. Study. and Broombridge Stations. Introduction of OPW to work with An Garda Síochána and 30km/h speed related bodies with regard to the limit. implementation of this measure. Develop a Both will commence in Q4 2021. Implementation of Recommendations to be rolled out. Parking Strategy recommendations and Review of of the Parking Bye- laws. Strategy and introduction of updated Bye-laws. A range of projects as outlined above will commence in Q4 2021. Evidenced based data will be refined with a view to implementing initiatives as per the phasing recommended above.

Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Proposed Gate & Road Impacts Briefly outlined below are the proposed arrangements with regard to gates and roads in the Phoenix Park. Vehicular Gate Pre Covid Arrangements Post Public Consultation Impacts Parkgate Street Two Way None Islandbridge Exit Only None Chapelizod Entry Only None Knockmaroon Two Way None Whites (beside Farmleigh) Closed None Castleknock Two Way None Ashtown Two Way Deferred Cabra Two Way Bus Only in Phase 2 Funeral/Grangegorman Closed None North Circular Two Way None

Roads Pre Covid Arrangements Post Public Consultation Impacts Upper Glen Road Two Way Cul de Sac North Road Two Way One Way All other Roads Various arrangements None

Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Appendix A | Feedback Form

Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Appendix B | Visitors Survey Statistics

Graph 1 | Age Group

Graph 2 | Location

Graph 3 | County

Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Graph 4 | Gender

Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Graph 5 | Visit the Park

Graph 6 | Use of the Park

Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Graph 7 | Time of day visit the Park

Graph 8 | How does a user stay

Graph 9 | Activity since COVID 19

Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Graph 10 | Approximate timing

Graph 11 | Purpose of visit

Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Graph 12 | Areas most visited in the Park

Graph 13 | Least visited area in the Park

Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Graph 14 | Mode of transport used to get to the Park

Graph 15 | Biodiversity in the Park

Graph 16 | Promotion of sustainable modes of transport

Graph 17 | Use of Park Roads

Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Graph 18 | Should walking and cycling be prioritised

Graph 19 | Phoenix Park a safe place to walk and cycle

Graph 20 | Rate signage on existing walking routes

Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Graph 21 | Rate existing wayfinding facilities

Graph 22 | Rating existing walking routes

Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Graph 23 | Should improvements be made to walking and cycling

Graph 24 | Walking and cycling routes connect with attractions in the Park

Graph 25 | Walking and cycling routes connect with external networks

Graph 26 | Do users of the Park use Public Transport

Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Graph 27 | What station is used to get off

Graph 28 | Rate existing public transport services to the Park

Graph 29 | Journey times using Public Transport

Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Graph 30 | What other means of transport will be used

Graph 31 | Public Transport servicing major attractions

Graph 32 | Internal shuttle loop

Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Graph 33 | External transport hubs at Broombridge and Heuston

Graph 34 | Should external public transport services be improved

Graph 35 | Would Public transport be used to access main park attractions

Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Graph 36 | Would a bus service in the Park encourage to attend more often

Graph 37 | Park roads were for people visiting and working in the Park

Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Graph 38 | Discourage movement of commuter vehicles in the Park

Graph 39 | Ashtown gate to entry only

Graph 40 | Reducing traffic

Graph 41 | If a private car is used would public transport be considered

Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Graph 42 | Parking Facilities

Graph 43 | Private car journey time

Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Graph 44 | Which gate do you currently use

Graph 45 | Which gate is used to depart the Park

Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Graph 46 | Parking free in the Park

Graph 47 | Should a speed limit be introduced within the Park

Graph 48 | If private car transport is reduced would safety be improved

Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Graph 49 | Should visitor safety be improved

Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Appendix C | Information Brochure

Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Appendix D | Newspaper Advert

Example of Irish language advert

Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Appendix E | Sample Media Coverage

Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Appendix F | Sample Social Media Posts

Sample Twitter Posts Sample Facebook Posts

#

Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Appendix G | List of Organisations and Residents Associations that responded to consultation

ORGANISATION NAME Dublin Front Runners Silverlining Coach - local bus operator based in Advocacy Committee in Hartstown Local Centre Dublin Zoo Blanchardstown area American Embassy Ekman Ireland Limited Sportsworld Running Club An Garda Síochána in Garda Headquarters Failte Ireland St Laurence's National School Chapelizod An Taisce Festival Republic St Mary's Hospital Ashtown Stables Fingal Cycling Campaign St Oliver Plunkett Eoghan Ruadh GAA Club Athletics Ireland Forensic Science Ireland St. Brendan's Ladies Gaelic Football Club Austin Campbell (RECDP) Guinness Enterprise Centre Stoneybatter Pride of Place Avestus Capital Partners HSE The CORN Steering Group Aviva Life & Pensions Ireland Irish Climate and Health Alliance The Defence Forces (McKee Barracks Camp Staff) Blackrock Athletic Club Ivanna Chovgan (SWICN) The Heritage Council Board of Environmental Social Enterprise Kathleen White (SICCDA) The Irish Heart Foundation Brothers Pearse Athletics Club Kilmainham Inchicore Network TU Dublin Caye Construction Castleknock KOC Chartered Quantity Surveyors and Unnamed organisation Cherry Orchard Hospital - Pharmacy Department Construction Consultants Unnamed organisation CIÉ and Iarnród Éireann LFL Worldwide Chauffeur Services RESIDENTS ASSOCIATIONS Civil Service Harriers Athletic Club Lifeline Ambulance Service Berkeley Road Area Residents Committee Clonliffe Harriers Liffey Valley Athletic Club with Dublin Athletic Blackhorse Avenue Residents Association Board Community Organisation and Residents Network Castleknock Residents Association (CORN) LMFC Committee Castleknock Tidytowns Crusaders Athletic Club Maria Flanagan (An Cosan VCC) Chapelizod Residents Association Cyclist.ie McKee Barracks Chesterfield Residents Association DASH Container Café Metropolitan Harriers and St. Brigid's Athletic Club COVA - Chapelizod Old Village Association Dept. of Housing, Local Government & Heritage Mount Sackville Secondary School DARA (Deerpark Area Residents Association) Donore Harriers Athletics Club Mount Sackville, Primary School Fairhaven Residents’ Association Dublin Athletic Board NCBI Georgian Village Residents Association Dublin Bus Phoenix Cricket Club Mulberry Association Residents Dublin City Harriers Rathfarnham WSAF Athletic Club Navan Road Community Council Dublin Commuters Rebuild the Silver bridge campaign Phibsboro Village Tidy Towns

Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Pines, Hadleigh and Beechpark Neighbourhood Watch.

RCPCA Committee Royal Canal Park Community Association Strawberry Beds Residents association The Paddock Residents Association Woodpark & Area Residents Association Unnamed Residents Association ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES An Tánaiste, Leo Varadkar TD Bríd Smith TD Ciarán Cuffe, MEP for Dublin Cllr. Colm O’Rourke Cllr Daniel Whooley Cllr. Darcy Lonergan Cllr Declan Meenagh Cllr Eimer McCormack Cllr. Howard Mahony Cllr Janet Horner Cllr Joe Costello Cllr John Walsh Cllr Michael Pidgeon Cllr Pamela Conroy Cllr Siobhan Shovlin Cllr Ted Leddy Dublin West Greens Fine Gael Dublin West Constituency Jack Chambers TD Neasa Hourigan TD Paul Donnelly TD Roderic O’ Gorman TD Senator Emer Currie Senator Marie Sherlock Senator Mary Fitzpatrick

Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Appendix H | Schematics of Recommended Networks

Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report

Phoenix Park Transport and Mobility Options Study | Post Consultation Report