DOCSLIB.ORG

Nurturing Nature Connectedness Through Primary Education?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nurturing Nature Connectedness Through Primary Education? Nurturing nature connectedness through primary education? A study into the role of nature experiences in primary education in The Netherlands in children’s connectedness to nature as precursor of pro-environmental behaviour R.S. van Tol, Bsc Master thesis Forest & Nature Conservation Supervision: Dr. Birgit Elands, Prof. dr. Matthijs Schouten December 10th, 2019 Author: Reineke van Tol, Bsc Student nr: 940302837110 Master: Forest and Nature conservation (management track) Department: Forest and nature conservation policy group (FNP) Supervision: Dr. Birgit Elands and Prof. Dr. Matthijs Schouten University: Wageningen University & Research Date: December 10th, 2019 Contact: [email protected]; [email protected]; 2 "Earth and sky, woods and fields, lakes and rivers, the mountain and the sea, are excellent schoolmasters; they teach us more than we can ever learn from books." — John Lubbock 3 Content Preface ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................. 9 Nederlandse samenvatting ..................................................................................................................... 11 Abstract ................................................................................................................................................. 15 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 18 2. Theoretical framework .................................................................................................................. 21 2.1 Nature connectedness ............................................................................................................ 21 2.2 Foundations of nature connectedness .................................................................................... 22 2.2.1 Images of Nature and how they are formed .................................................................. 22 2.2.2 Children’s connectedness to nature ............................................................................... 24 2.3 Experience-based nature education ....................................................................................... 25 2.4 Environmental behaviour ...................................................................................................... 25 2.5 Conceptual framework .......................................................................................................... 26 2.6 Research questions ................................................................................................................ 27 3. Study design .................................................................................................................................. 28 3.1 Selection of schools ............................................................................................................... 28 3.1.1 Profile of schools ........................................................................................................... 29 3.2 Data collection ....................................................................................................................... 31 3.2.1 Data description ............................................................................................................. 32 3.2.2 Focus group interviews children ................................................................................... 33 3.2.3 Questionnaire children................................................................................................... 35 3.2.4 Teacher interviews......................................................................................................... 37 3.2.5 Questionnaire parents .................................................................................................... 37 3.3 Data analysis .......................................................................................................................... 37 3.4 Ethical justification ................................................................................................................ 38 4. Results ........................................................................................................................................... 39 4.1. Contextual explaining factors ................................................................................................ 39 4.1.1. Nature education at school ............................................................................................ 39 4.1.2. Nature accessibility ....................................................................................................... 42 4.1.3. Playing outside .............................................................................................................. 42 4.1.4. Time spent in nature ...................................................................................................... 42 4.1.5. Parents’ sense of importance of nature for children ...................................................... 44 4 4.1.6. Parents’ sense of responsibility ..................................................................................... 46 4.1.7. Role models ................................................................................................................... 46 4.2. Nature conceptualization ....................................................................................................... 48 4.2.1. Definitions of nature ...................................................................................................... 48 4.2.2. Human-nature relationship ............................................................................................ 49 4.2.3. Nature associations ........................................................................................................ 50 4.3. Emotional affinity towards nature ......................................................................................... 52 4.3.1. Enjoyment of nature ...................................................................................................... 53 4.3.2. Personal importance of nature ....................................................................................... 55 4.3.3. Sense of oneness ............................................................................................................ 55 4.3.4. Empathy for creatures.................................................................................................... 56 4.4. Environmental attitude .......................................................................................................... 57 4.4.1. Sense of importance of nature ....................................................................................... 57 4.4.2. Sense of Responsibility for Nature ................................................................................ 58 4.5. Nature connectedness scores ................................................................................................. 59 4.6. Explaining factors scores ....................................................................................................... 60 4.7. Explaining results .................................................................................................................. 61 4.7.1. Explaining the extremes ................................................................................................ 61 4.7.2. Explaining the more subtle differences ......................................................................... 62 4.7.3. Nature connectedness .................................................................................................... 65 5. Discussion ..................................................................................................................................... 68 5.1. Reflection on results .............................................................................................................. 68 5.1.1. Children’s images of nature ........................................................................................... 68 5.1.2. Children’s nature connectedness ................................................................................... 69 5.1.3. Effects of nature education programmes ....................................................................... 70 5.2. Reflection on methodology ................................................................................................... 72 5.2.1. Questions and questioning ............................................................................................. 72 5.2.2. Visualization .................................................................................................................. 73 5.2.3. Investigator influence .................................................................................................... 74 5.2.4. Geographic locations ..................................................................................................... 74 5.2.5. Number of participants .................................................................................................. 75 5.2.6. Sampling bias ................................................................................................................ 75 5.2.7. Levels
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Towards a Better Understanding of the Relationship Between Individual's
    sustainability Article Towards a Better Understanding of the Relationship between Individual’s Self-Reported Connection to Nature, Personal Well-Being and Environmental Awareness Kay Fretwell 1 and Alison Greig 2,* 1 School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9LD, UK; [email protected] 2 Global Sustainability Institute, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 14 December 2018; Accepted: 28 February 2019; Published: 6 March 2019 Abstract: This paper examines the relationships between an individual’s self-reported connection to nature (CTN) and aspects of their personal well-being (PWB) and environmental awareness. Specifically, it addresses (i) the relationship between CTN and PWB; (ii) the external variables which influence trait-level CTN over a person’s life course and (iii) how individuals feel about CTN. A mixed methodology is used, with qualitative data adding depth and insight into the statistical associations recorded. The results are drawn from a sample of 222 respondents living in the City of Bath, UK. This study uncovered a significant relationship between CTN and some aspects of PWB which did not always align with research undertaken in other countries. Demographic variables, childhood experiences of nature, usual frequency of nature contact, and nature-related hobbies were all found to affect CTN. A number of barriers to CTN were also identified. Although the literature already provides considerable evidence of positive relationships between contact with nature and a range of mental and physical health benefits, the nature and mechanisms behind these relationships are not well understood, particularly for the UK population.
    [Show full text]
  • An Exploration of the Relationships Among Connectedness to Nature, Quality of Life, and Mental Health
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 8-2012 An Exploration of the Relationships Among Connectedness to Nature, Quality of Life, and Mental Health Peter Gelden Tauber Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Tauber, Peter Gelden, "An Exploration of the Relationships Among Connectedness to Nature, Quality of Life, and Mental Health" (2012). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 1260. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/1260 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AN EXPLORATION OF THE RELATIONSHIPS AMONG CONNECTEDNESS TO NATURE, QUALITY OF LIFE, AND MENTAL HEALTH by Peter G. Tauber A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Psychology Approved: Gayle S. Morse, Ph.D. M. Scott DeBerard, Ph.D. Committee Chair Committee Member JoAnn T. Tschanz, Ph.D. Mark R. McLellan, Ph.D. Committee Member Vice President for Research and Dean of the School of Graduate Studies UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 2012 ii Copyright © Peter G. Tauber 2012 All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT An Exploration of the Relationships Among Connectedness to Nature, Quality of Life, and Mental Health by Peter G. Tauber, Master of Science Utah State University, 2012 Major Professor: Gayle S. Morse, Ph.D. Department: Psychology The current study examined the relationships among connectedness to nature (CTN), quality of life (QOL), and mental health (MH).
    [Show full text]
  • Relationship Between Connectedness to Nature and Subjective Well–Being
    Indian Journal of Psychological Science, ISSN-0976 9218 January-2014 Relationship Between Connectedness to Nature and Subjective Well–Being *Rajesh Kumar **Roshan Lal ***Yashu Bansal ****Kimmi Vaneet Kaur Sethi Abstract Connectedness to nature can be understood in terms of close affiliation with the natural world in a physical, cognitive and emotional manner.The purpose of the current study was to find out the relationship between connectedness with nature and subjective well - being. It was hypothesized that connectedness with nature was positively related with positive affect and satisfaction with life and negatively related with negative affect. A sample of 80 adultsin the age range of 20 – 30 years was taken from tricity (that is, Chandigarh, Mohali and Panchkula). The Connectedness to Nature Scale (Mayer and Frantz, 2004), Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (Watson et al., 1988) and Satisfaction with Life Scale (Diener et al., 1985)were administered on the sample. The results were in line with the prediction. Key Words: Nature, Connectedness, Well-being, Life Satisfaction *Assistant Professor, Dept. of Psychology, P.G. Govt. College, Sector-46, Chandigarh **Assistant Professor, Dept. of Psychology,Panjab University, Chandigarh. ***Research Scholar, Derpt. Of Psychology, Panjab University, Chandigarh. **** Assistant Professor, MCM DAV College for Women, Chandigarh. Introduction a sensation of kinship and an affective individual The current materialistic world has experience of connection with nature (Mayer drifted man away from nature. Humans today a n d F r a n t z , 2 0 0 4 ; S c h u l t z e t a l . , prefer to live their life with the technological 2004).Subjective Well - Being refers to people's innovations rather than the magnificent beauty evaluations of their lives--evaluations that are of nature.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship Between Nature Connectedness and Happiness: a Meta-Analysis
    ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE published: 08 September 2014 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00976 The relationship between nature connectedness and happiness: a meta-analysis Colin A. Capaldi , Raelyne L. Dopko and John M. Zelenski* Department of Psychology, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada Edited by: Research suggests that contact with nature can be beneficial, for example leading to Marc Glenn Berman, The University improvements in mood, cognition, and health. A distinct but related idea is the personality of South Carolina, USA construct of subjective nature connectedness, a stable individual difference in cognitive, Reviewed by: affective, and experiential connection with the natural environment. Subjective nature Sara Unsworth, San Diego State University, USA connectedness is a strong predictor of pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors that may William Sullivan, University of Illinois also be positively associated with subjective well-being. This meta-analysis was conducted at Urbana-Champaign, USA to examine the relationship between nature connectedness and happiness. Based on 30 *Correspondence: samples (n = 8523), a fixed-effect meta-analysis found a small but significant effect size John M. Zelenski, Department of (r = 0.19). Those who are more connected to nature tended to experience more positive Psychology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON, affect, vitality, and life satisfaction compared to those less connected to nature. Publication K1S5B6,Canada status, year, average age, and percentage of females in the sample were not significant e-mail: [email protected] moderators. Vitality had the strongest relationship with nature connectedness (r = 0.24), followed by positive affect (r = 0.22) and life satisfaction (r = 0.17).
    [Show full text]
  • How Knowing and Experiencing Nature Affect Well-Being
    EG38CH18-Russell ARI 16 September 2013 15:16 Humans and Nature: How Knowing and Experiencing Nature Affect Well-Being Roly Russell,1 Anne D. Guerry,2 Patricia Balvanera,3 Rachelle K. Gould,4 Xavier Basurto,5 Kai M.A. Chan,6 Sarah Klain,6 Jordan Levine,6 and Jordan Tam6 1The Sandhill Institute for Complexity and Sustainability, Grand Forks, British Columbia V0H 1H9, Canada; email: [email protected] 2Natural Capital Project, Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Seattle, Washington 98115; email: [email protected] 3Centro de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas, Universidad Nacional Autonoma´ de Mexico,´ Morelia, Michoacan,´ 58350 Mexico; email: [email protected] 4Emmett Interdisciplinary Program in Environment and Resources, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305; email: [email protected] 5Duke Marine Lab, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Beaufort, North Carolina 28516; email: [email protected] 6Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada; email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2013. 38:473–502 Keywords First published online as a Review in Advance on well-being, ecosystem, cultural ecosystem services, channels of human August 2, 2013 experience, constituents of well-being, nonmaterial ecosystem The Annual Review of Environment and Resources is benefits, ecosystem goods and services online at http://environ.annualreviews.org This article’s doi: Abstract 10.1146/annurev-environ-012312-110838 Ecosystems provide many of the material building blocks for human Copyright c 2013 by Annual Reviews. well-being.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nature of Happiness: Nature Af Fi Liation and Mental Well-Being
    Chapter 11 The Nature of Happiness: Nature Af fi liation and Mental Well-Being Andrew J. Howell and Holli-Anne Passmore Appreciating the beauty of a blossom, the loveliness of a lilac, or the grace of a gazelle are all ways in which people can, in some small measure, fi ll their daily lives with evolutionarily inspired epiphanies of pleasure (Buss 2000 , p. 22). It has been over 25 years since E. O. Wilson ( 1984 ) wrote Biophilia , in which he argued for an evolved inclination among humans to af fi liate with nature. Wilson reasoned that, because our ancestors’ survival and reproduction depended upon access to natural resources, selection pressures favored those who had an af fi nity to orient toward nature. Findings in support of Wilson’s biophilia hypothesis have emerged (Kaplan and Kaplan 1989 ; Ulrich 1993 ) , including evidence for human preference for savannah-like landscapes, bene fi cial physiological responses to natural environments relative to manufactured environments, and improvements in cognitive functioning and restorative effects on mental well-being as a result of exposure to nature (see review by Joye 2007 ) . Additional support for Wilson’s ( 1984 ) idea that we have a deep-rooted connec- tion to nature comes from the fact that only recently in our evolutionary history have we separated ourselves from a hunter-gatherer way of life which was immersed daily in nature (Burns 2005 ; Frumkin 2001 ; Gullone 2000 ; Kahn 1997 ; Kellert 1997 ; Nesse and Wiliams 1996 ) . There is dissociation between human biology and modern urban life. As Gelter ( 2000 ) writes, “[t]he time-span in our habitat change from the natural world setting into the technological habitat is too short for the evolutionary processes to permit any major biological adaptations” (p.
    [Show full text]
  • The Seven Pathways to Nature Connectedness: a Focus Group Exploration Ryan Lumber, Miles Richardson, & David Sheffield
    The Seven Pathways to Nature Connectedness: A Focus Group Exploration Ryan Lumber, Miles Richardson, & David Sheffield 1 Abstract The Biophilia hypothesis has been a catalyst for research on the human-nature relationship, with connection to nature an important area. However, the mechanisms involved in achieving this connection have not been explored in a systematic way. Three focus groups were conducted using the Biophilia hypothesis as a framework to explore how connectedness to nature can be achieved from the perspective of individuals who engage with nature through the Biophilic values. Seven themes emerged from the thematic analysis: investigating nature through scientific enquiry, engaging the senses, creating idyllic nature, noting nature through artistry, nature conservation, growing food and engaging with wild nature. Nature connectedness may result from specific interactions with nature with the seven pathways having implications for both the formation and maintenance of nature connectedness. The factors identified should inform interventions to increase the nature connectedness of individuals with a low connection but further empirical study is required. 2 1. Introduction Humanity often perceives itself as separate from nature, especially in industrialised western societies (Vining, Merrick & Price, 2008). This has led to research aiming to reconnect humanity with nature becoming a common theme within the literature (Tam, 2013). The development of a positive human-nature relationship can arise from engaging with nature through the nine values of Biophilia (Kellert & Wilson, 1993) and through the sensation of being connected with nature (Mayer & Frantz, 2004). Often Biophilia and Connectedness to Nature are thought to relate with Biophilia acting as an innate desire to connect with nature (Kals, Schmacher & Montada, 1999; Nisbet, Zelenski & Murphy, 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Is Nature Relatedness Associated with Better Mental and Physical Health?
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Article Is Nature Relatedness Associated with Better Mental and Physical Health? Julie H. Dean 1,* ID , Danielle F. Shanahan 2,3, Robert Bush 1, Kevin J. Gaston 4, Brenda B. Lin 5, Elizabeth Barber 1 ID , Lara Franco 2 and Richard A. Fuller 2 ID 1 Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia; [email protected] (R.B.); [email protected] (E.B.) 2 School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia; [email protected] (D.F.S.); [email protected] (L.F.); [email protected] (R.A.F.) 3 Zealandia, 31 Waiapu Road, Karori, WLG 6012, New Zealand 4 Environment & Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter, Penryn, Cornwall TR10 9EZ, UK; [email protected] 5 CSIRO Land & Water Flagship, PMB 1, 107-121 Station Street, Aspendale, VIC 3195, Australia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-733-651-111 Received: 7 June 2018; Accepted: 26 June 2018; Published: 29 June 2018 Abstract: Nature relatedness is a psychological characteristic with the potential to drive interaction with nature and influence well-being. We surveyed 1538 people in Brisbane, Australia to investigate how nature relatedness varies among socio-demographic groups. We determined whether people with higher nature relatedness reported fewer symptoms of depression, anxiety, stress and better overall health, controlling for potentially confounding socio-demographic and health-related variables. Overall nature relatedness was higher in older people, females, those without children living at home, not working, and people speaking English at home.
    [Show full text]
  • A Qualitative Exploration of Individual Differences in Wellbeing for Highly Sensitive Individuals Becky A. Black and Margaret L
    A Qualitative Exploration of Individual Differences in Wellbeing for Highly Sensitive Individuals Becky A. Black and Margaret L. Kern The University of Melbourne Author Note Becky Black, Melbourne Graduate School of Education, The University of Melbourne, Australia, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8421-0694; Margaret L. Kern, Melbourne Graduate School of Education, The University of Melbourne, Australia, http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4300-598X Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Becky Black, Melbourne Graduate School of Education, The University of Melbourne, 100 Leicester Street, Level 2, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia. Ph: +61 415 205 996, Email: [email protected] This manuscript has been accepted on 29th April 2020 for publication in Palgrave Communications Journal Abstract Cultures explicitly and implicitly create and reinforce social norms and expectations, which impact upon how individuals make sense of and experience their place within that culture. Numerous studies find substantial differences across a range of behavioral and cognitive indices between what have been called ‘Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD)’ societies and non-WEIRD cultures. Indeed, lay conceptions and social norms around wellbeing tend to emphasize social outgoingness and high-arousal positive emotions, with introversion and negative emotion looked down upon or even pathologized. However, this extravert-centric conception of wellbeing does not fit many individuals who live within WEIRD societies, and studies find that this mismatch can have detrimental effects on their wellbeing. There is a need to better understand how wellbeing is created and experienced by the large number of people for whom wellbeing manifests in alternative ways.
    [Show full text]
  • A Measure of Nature Connectedness for Children and Adults: Validation, Performance, and Insights
    sustainability Article A Measure of Nature Connectedness for Children and Adults: Validation, Performance, and Insights Miles Richardson 1,* , Anne Hunt 2, Joe Hinds 3, Rachel Bragg 4, Dean Fido 1 , Dominic Petronzi 1, Lea Barbett 1 , Theodore Clitherow 5 and Matthew White 5 1 Human Sciences Research Centre, University of Derby, Derby DE22 1GB, UK; [email protected] (D.F.); [email protected] (D.P.); [email protected] (L.B.) 2 Valuing Environment Team, Natural England, York YO1 7PX, UK; [email protected] 3 Department of Psychology, Social Work and Counselling, Faculty of Education & Health, University of Greenwich, Greenwich, London SE10 9LS, UK; [email protected] 4 Care Farming UK, Bristol BS3 4NA, UK; [email protected] 5 European Centre for Environment and Human Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Truro, Cornwall, TR1 3HD, UK; [email protected] (T.C.); [email protected] (M.W.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 28 March 2019; Accepted: 20 May 2019; Published: 12 June 2019 Abstract: With benefits to both human well-being and pro-nature conservation behaviors, nature connectedness is emerging as an important psychological construct for a sustainable future. The growing research and applied and policy-related interests require a straightforward measure of nature connectedness that is suitable for both children and adult populations. To establish the reliability of the new Nature Connection Index (NCI) three factor analyses were conducted. One was based on a large Monitor of Engagement with the Natural Environment (MENE) dataset for adults (n = 3568) with a replication from data sets collected online (n = 553), and a third used MENE data from children (n = 351).
    [Show full text]
  • Psychedelics Increase Nature Relatedness in a State-Mediated and Context-Dependent Manner
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Article From Egoism to Ecoism: Psychedelics Increase Nature Relatedness in a State-Mediated and Context-Dependent Manner , Hannes Kettner y , Sam Gandy y *, Eline C. H. M. Haijen and Robin L. Carhart-Harris Centre for Psychedelic Research, Department of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, UK; [email protected] (H.K.); [email protected] (E.C.H.M.H.); [email protected] (R.L.C.-H.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Both authors contributed equally to this manuscript. y Received: 1 November 2019; Accepted: 8 December 2019; Published: 16 December 2019 Abstract: (1) Background: There appears to be a growing disconnection between humans and their natural environments which has been linked to poor mental health and ecological destruction. Previous research suggests that individual levels of nature relatedness can be increased through the use of classical psychedelic compounds, although a causal link between psychedelic use and nature relatedness has not yet been established. (2) Methods: Using correlations and generalized linear mixed regression modelling, we investigated the association between psychedelic use and nature relatedness in a prospective online study. Individuals planning to use a psychedelic received questionnaires 1 week before (N = 654), plus one day, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 2 years after a psychedelic experience. (3) Results: The frequency of lifetime psychedelic use was positively correlated with nature relatedness at baseline. Nature relatedness was significantly increased 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 2 years after the psychedelic experience. This increase was positively correlated with concomitant increases in psychological well-being and was dependent on the extent of ego-dissolution and the perceived influence of natural surroundings during the acute psychedelic state.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case for Nature Connectedness As a Distinct Goal of Early Childhood Education
    The International Journal of Early Childhood Environmental Education, 6(2), p. 59 International Journal of Early Childhood Environmental Education Copyright © North American Association for Environmental Education ISSN: 2331-0464 (online) The Case for Nature Connectedness as a Distinct Goal of Early Childhood Education Alexia Barrable University of Dundee, Scotland Submitted November 3, 2018; accepted February 11, 2019 ABSTRACT The importance of young children learning about the natural environment has been recognised in policy and curricular frameworks around the world. Moreover, there has been a call for children to spend more time outdoors and to reconnect with nature. However, the distinct construct of nature connectedness has not been examined in detail in relation to early childhood education. This article aims to bring together environmental psychology literature and early years’ policy in an attempt to make the case for nature connectedness becoming a distinct goal in early childhood curricular frameworks. Furthermore, it aims to highlight gaps in the research literature and offer clear directions for future research. Keywords: nature Connectedness; young children; early childhood; curriculum; policy; outdoor learning It is generally agreed that good quality early education can play an important role towards the optimal development of children (Pianta et al., 2016). The effects of good quality early education are not merely transitory, but can be seen long after that phase of life has finished and well into adult life (Barnett, 1998; Ramey et al., 2000; Reynolds and Ou, 2011). The effects in question include cognitive skills and academic achievement (Ramey et al., 2000), but also encompass aspects of psychological wellbeing, in this case defined as smaller likelihood of depressive symptoms (Reynolds and Ou, 2011).
    [Show full text]