DOCSLIB.ORG

The Reintroduction of Rhinos to Gonarezhou National Park, Zimbabwe: a Feasibility Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Reintroduction of Rhinos to Gonarezhou National Park, Zimbabwe: a Feasibility Study THE REINTRODUCTION OF RHINOS TO GONAREZHOU NATIONAL PARK, ZIMBABWE: A FEASIBILITY STUDY Institutional, Management and Security Issues Raoul du Toit and Lovemore Mungwashu Biological Aspects and IUCN Reintroduction Guidelines Kevin M. Dunham Feasibility Study for the Development of a Rhino IPZ in Gonarezhou Semester 12a Task 3.1-12.1 PUBLICATION CREDITS: Title: The Reintroduction of Rhinos to Gonarezhou National Park, Zimbabwe: a Feasibility Study Authors: Institutional, Management and Security Issues: Raoul du Toit and Lovemore Mungwashu Biological Aspects and IUCN Reintroduction Guidelines: Kevin M. Dunham Date: May 2005 Special Dr Fay Robertson, PWMA, Malangwe Trust, Mr Bruce Clegg acknowledgements: This report is an output from a task of the SADC Regional Programme for Rhino Conservation ABOUT the SADC Regional Programme for Rhino Conservation: The Programme is funded by the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Directorate General for Development Cooperation (Project AID 5064). The Programme is contracted to CESVI and implemented through a regional consortium which comprises: The Secretariat of the Southern Africa Development Community (SADC) IUCN-ROSA (The World Conservation Union - Regional Office for Southern Africa) The IUCN African Rhino Specialist Group WWF-SARPO - (World Wide Fund for Nature - Southern Africa Regional Programme Office) CESVI (Cooperazione e Sviluppo) The Programme goal is to contribute to maintain viable and well distributed metapopulations of Southern African rhino taxa as flagship species for biodiversity conservation within the SADC region. The Programme objective is to implement a pragmatic regional rhino strategy within the SADC region following the acquisition of sound information on, firstly, the constraints and opportunities for rhino conservation within each range state and secondly, the constraints and opportunities for rhino metapopulation management at the regional level. DISCLAIMER The information, opinions and materials presented herewith do not necessarily reflect the official views of any of the organisations involved, including the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, SADC, CESVI, IUCN-ROSA, WWF-SARPO, AfRSG or governments of SADC member countries. CONTACT DETAILS FOR THE PROGRAMME: SADC Regional Rhino Programme Coordinator SADC Secretariat IUCN-ROSA Directorate of Food, Agriculture & Natural Resources 6 Lanark Road, Belgravia, PO Box 745, Harare, P O Box 0095 Zimbabwe Gaborone Tel: 263-4-728266 Fax: 263-4-720738 Botswana CESVI Zimbabwe Office Ministero degli Affari Esteri 9 Coxwell Road, Milton Park, Harare, Zimbabwe Direzione Generale per la Cooperazione allo Tel: 263-4-737099, 737155, 737162-3, 736446 Sviluppo, Unità Tecnica Centrale Fax: 263 4 737182 Viale Contarini (angolo Viale Farnesina) Email: [email protected] 00194 ROMA ITALY The Reintroduction of Rhinos to Gonarezhou National Park, Zimbabwe: A Feasibility Study EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A rhino Intensive Protection Zone (IPZ) is proposed in the northern section (about 1,130 sq. km) of Gonarezhou NP, to receive founder groups of both black and white rhinos. The need to restock the Park with black rhinos arises because a previous reintroduction of this species failed due to poaching (some of which was perpetrated by the staff of the Park) in the late 1980s and early 1990s. White rhinos were never deliberately reintroduced to the Park and the few that strayed in from neighbouring ranches in the 1980s did not persist as a breeding population. The IPZ proposal is reviewed in this report in terms of a range of issues including security, management, institutional, biological and ecological factors, and is evaluated against international guidelines for wildlife reintroduction programmes. The review highlights a number of strengths as well as a number of weaknesses in the proposal. The habitats are sufficiently suitable for a founder population of at least 20 black rhinos, with significant expansion potential, but it is inevitable that some black rhinos will move out of the IPZ in due course, especially towards the south and south-east. Release procedures must be carefully planned to minimize initial dispersal. For white rhinos, habitat suitability is more dubious and the introduction of 20 white rhinos should only be done on an experimental basis with a fall-back plan in place to relocate some or all of the rhinos elsewhere if they demonstrate nutritional problems or excessive dispersal. The security of the proposed IPZ is currently compromised by an invasion of squatters in the north- eastern corner of Gonarezhou NP, which is a manifestation of a long-standing land claim. Resolution of this problem, through a sensitive and sustainable approach rather than through simple eviction of the community, will be a precondition for the establishment of the IPZ, particularly insofar as donor support and private sector investment are concerned. Another major problem is that antipoaching manpower and equipment for the IPZ are likely to remain below recommended levels. To address the land claim as well as the insufficiency of antipoaching resources, the development of a Public/Private Partnership (PPP) is recommended. This would involve private sector investors who could develop some recently-advertised ecotourism concessions within or adjacent to the proposed IPZ, and would create a shareholding for the local community. To achieve economies of scale, this PPP should be linked with existing ecotourism operations in the area. The PPP could play a significant role in rhino monitoring within the IPZ thereby enabling the limited antipoaching resources to be utilized with maximum efficiency. The concept of a PPP, with a conservation role as well as a commercial role and with community participation, is fully in accordance with the management policies of the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Park. i The Reintroduction of Rhinos to Gonarezhou National Park, Zimbabwe: A Feasibility Study OVERVIEW SWOT Analysis • A workshop to review the strengths, weaknesses, threats and opportunities of the proposed IPZ identified the following factors as critical to the success of the plan to reintroduce rhinos to Gonarezhou NP: Resolution of the present and any potential future land claims and occupations; Securing adequate funding and resources; Development of suitable mechanisms for co-operation and co-ordination with potential partners; and Improved tourism (and staff) access to the Park and the IPZ. Original Populations of Rhinos • Black rhinos were recorded in the vicinity of the present Gonarezhou National Park during the late 19th century. The last black rhino of the original population was killed probably during the 1930s or early 1940s. • The earliest records of the white rhinoceros in the vicinity of Gonarezhou NP are rock paintings. The written records of white rhinos closest to Gonarezhou NP are from 1836/37, 100 km west of the southern-most part of the Park. • There are no material records of the white rhinoceros in Zimbabwe after the 1890s, but there are several unsubstantiated reports of white rhinos in the vicinity of the present Gonarezhou NP during the first 30 years of the 20th century, i.e. after the white rhinoceros was generally thought to be extinct in Zimbabwe. The First Reintroduction of Black Rhinos • Seventy-seven black rhinos were released in the present Gonarezhou NP during 1969-1971. Most were freed north of the Runde River. During the 1970s, a programme for the development of artificial supplies of water for wildlife was initiated, but after 1976 the piped artificial water supplies were closed down for several years. The initiation and then closure of this system may have influenced the dispersal of rhinos. Most sightings of black rhinos were in the northern half of the Park, but two rhinos captured in the north of Kruger NP during 1979-1982 were believed to have come from Gonarezhou. • Between the Save and Runde Rivers, very few black rhinos were seen in the northern half of this area. Instead most rhinos were seen closer to the Runde River, within 10 km of pools that provided drinking water at the end of the dry season even in drought years. The vegetation of this area during the period when it was occupied by black rhinos was described only broadly, but it included thickets that were probably attractive to the rhinos. Several lines of evidence suggest that their density in this area averaged 1 rhino per 10 sq. km. Surveys of the rhinos differed in methods and study areas, but probably the Park’s population at its peak exceeded 100 animals. Poaching • Rhino poaching was recorded soon after the releases, but the number killed increased markedly during 1984. Some staff members of the Department of National Parks & Wild Life Management and some army personnel are alleged to have been involved in this poaching. By 1994, the black rhinoceros was locally extinct for the second time. White Rhinos in Gonarezhou NP • A few white rhinos were seen in Gonarezhou NP during the 1980s, after they entered the Park of their own accord from the adjacent Lone Star Ranch (now Malilangwe Estate). The last of these rhinos was captured and translocated during 1993. ii The Reintroduction of Rhinos to Gonarezhou National Park, Zimbabwe: A Feasibility Study Artificial Supplies of Water for Wildlife • The piped artificial supplies of water for wildlife have not been consistently maintained. From the point-of-view of the animals, these supplies have been opened and closed unpredictably. Cessation of pumping in an area where rhinos have settled can cause social disruption, including intraspecific fighting, and unpredictable dispersal. • The major disadvantages of an artificial supply of water are that: (a) it causes an increase in the local density of elephants and in their impact on the woody vegetation; (b) it is expensive to install and maintain; and (c) cessation of these supplies can disrupt rhino home ranges, causing dispersion and intraspecies fighting. During the severe 1992 drought, the DNPWLM was dependent on the private sector to overhaul and maintain the artificial supply of water in Gonarezhou NP. • It is recommended that the rhino reintroductions are planned on the basis that only natural supplies of water will be available for the rhinos to drink.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Promotion of Climate-Resilient Lifestyles Among Rural Families in Gutu
    Promotion of climate-resilient lifestyles among rural families in Gutu (Masvingo Province), Mutasa (Manicaland Province) and Shamva (Mashonaland Central Province) Districts | Zimbabwe Sahara and Sahel Observatory 26 November 2019 Promotion of climate-resilient lifestyles among rural families in Gutu Project/Programme title: (Masvingo Province), Mutasa (Manicaland Province) and Shamva (Mashonaland Central Province) Districts Country(ies): Zimbabwe National Designated Climate Change Management Department, Ministry of Authority(ies) (NDA): Environment, Water and Climate Development Aid from People to People in Zimbabwe (DAPP Executing Entities: Zimbabwe) Accredited Entity(ies) (AE): Sahara and Sahel Observatory Date of first submission/ 7/19/2019 V.1 version number: Date of current submission/ 11/26/2019 V.2 version number A. Project / Programme Information (max. 1 page) ☒ Project ☒ Public sector A.2. Public or A.1. Project or programme A.3 RFP Not applicable private sector ☐ Programme ☐ Private sector Mitigation: Reduced emissions from: ☐ Energy access and power generation: 0% ☐ Low emission transport: 0% ☐ Buildings, cities and industries and appliances: 0% A.4. Indicate the result ☒ Forestry and land use: 25% areas for the project/programme Adaptation: Increased resilience of: ☒ Most vulnerable people and communities: 25% ☒ Health and well-being, and food and water security: 25% ☐ Infrastructure and built environment: 0% ☒ Ecosystem and ecosystem services: 25% A.5.1. Estimated mitigation impact 399,223 tCO2eq (tCO2eq over project lifespan) A.5.2. Estimated adaptation impact 12,000 direct beneficiaries (number of direct beneficiaries) A.5. Impact potential A.5.3. Estimated adaptation impact 40,000 indirect beneficiaries (number of indirect beneficiaries) A.5.4. Estimated adaptation impact 0.28% of the country’s total population (% of total population) A.6.
    [Show full text]
  • Gonarezhou Safari Areas in the South Eastern Zimbabwe
    GONAREZHOU SAFARI AREAS IN THE SOUTH EASTERN ZIMBABWE The Gonarezhou Safari Areas are hunting areas that are open/un fenced areas adjoined to the Gonarezhou National or the Kruger National Park or the Mozambique National Park, these are massive areas made up of different concessions that form part of the collective Gonarezhou Hunting concessions, the ones that JWK Safaris offers are as follows from North to South. • Naivaisha Safari Area is a community owned safari/hunting area that is operated by a Zimbabwean Safari Operator on a community sharing program, there are no people living in Naivaisha that shares a 33 kilometre un-fenced open boundary with the Gonarezhou National Park, the concession including the adjoined Chibedziva hot spots is around 100.000 hectares. Naivaisha is amongst the best leopard areas in Zimbabwe, is perfect for buffalo, very good for trophy elephant bulls, sable, lion and plain game all found in good numbers in this beautiful, well run concession. See camp photos attached. A big plus for cat hunters is that night hunting of nocturnal species is permitted in Naivaisha. Hippo and croc are available nearby. • Malipati Safari Area is a Zimbabwe National Parks Safari area, the area is around 56.000 Hectares in extent and is adjoined to the Gonarezhou National Park via the Nuanetsi River. There are no people living in Malipati Safari area. Keys species for Malipati are buffalo, elephant, leopard, nyala, bushbuck, waterbuck. Hippo and croc are available nearby. World renowned as a fantastic safari area. • The Sengwe 1 anD 2 TTL (Tribal Trust Land) hunting areas are open and adjoined to the Gonarezhou National Park, the Kruger National Park and also Mozambique, Crooks Corner on the Zim side is in our concession and a real hot spot for dagga boys.
    [Show full text]
  • Gonarezhou National Park (GNP) and the Indigenous Communities of South East Zimbabwe, 1934-2008
    Living on the fringes of a protected area: Gonarezhou National Park (GNP) and the indigenous communities of South East Zimbabwe, 1934-2008 by Baxter Tavuyanago A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy (History) in the Department of Historical and Heritage Studies at the UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA FACULTY OF HUMANITIES SUPERVISOR: PROFESSOR A. S. MLAMBO July 2016 i © University of Pretoria Abstract This study examines the responses of communities of south-eastern Zimbabwe to their eviction from the Gonarezhou National Park (GNP) and their forced settlement in the peripheral areas of the park. The thesis establishes that prior to their eviction, the people had created a utilitarian relationship with their fauna and flora which allowed responsible reaping of the forest’s products. It reveals that the introduction of a people-out conservation mantra forced the affected communities to become poachers, to emigrate from south-eastern Zimbabwe in large numbers to South Africa for greener pastures and, to fervently join militant politics of the 1960s and 1970s. These forms of protests put them at loggerheads with the colonial government. The study reveals that the independence government’s position on the inviolability of the country’s parks put the people and state on yet another level of confrontation as the communities had anticipated the restitution of their ancestral lands. The new government’s attempt to buy their favours by engaging them in a joint wildlife management project called CAMPFIRE only slightly relieved the pain. The land reform programme of the early 2000s, again, enabled them to recover a small part of their old Gonarezhou homeland.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Matobo National Park, Zimbabwe
    CHIPANGALI WILDLIFE TRUST CARNIVORE RESEARCH INSTITUTE (CRI) Up-date of all Research Projects September 2005 CONTENTS Description Page No Project No 1 : The food and feeding habits of the leopard 1 (Panthera pardus) in the Matobo National Park, Zimbabwe. Project No 2 : The home range and movements of radio-collared 1 leopards (Panthera pardus) in the Matobo National Park, Zimbabwe. Project No 3 : Capture and translocation of problem cheetahs, 3 leopards and brown hyaenas found killing domestic livestock and the monitoring of their movements after release back into the wild. Project No 4 : The home range and movements of a radio-collared 4 brown hyaena (Hyaena brunnea) in the Matobo Hills World Heritage Site. Project No 5 : Check-list and Atlas of the Carnivores of Matabeleland. 4 Project No 6 : Field Survey and Captive Breeding Programme of the 6 Southern African Python (Python natalensis). Project No 7 : Biodiversity of the Matobo Hills World Heritage Site. 7 Acknowledgements. 9 PROJECT NO 1: THE FOOD AND FEEDING Leopard Kills Serval (Matopos National Park) HABITS OF THE LEOPARD (Panthera pardus) IN THE MATOBO NATIONAL PARK, ZIMBABWE On Tuesday 14th September, 2004 at 6:30am we were on our way to Maleme Vlei to catch This project commenced in January 2002 and after a invertebrates as part of our biodiversity survey of period of 4 years it will finally come to an end in the Matobo Hills World Heritage Site. December 2005. Up until the end of 2004 we had already collected 2630 different piles of droppings as At less than 20 metres from our tented camp at follows: Maleme Dam we came across signs of a kill that had taken place during the night.
    [Show full text]
  • Terence Ranger Bibliography T
    Review N°89 - Spring 2015 An Association of Concerned Africa Scholars (ACAS) Tribute to Terence O. Ranger (29 November 1929 – 3 January 2015) Compiled by Timothy Scarnecchia, Teresa Barnes, and Peter Limb April 8, 2015 This special ACAS Review pays tribute to Terence O. Ranger who passed on January 3, 2015, just after midnight just past his 86th Birthday. We sent out a call for tributes in January. We also know that Terry’s students, as well as the Editorial Board of the Journal of Southern African Studies, and the members of the British Zimbabwe Society will be producing their own tributes. We at ACAS who worked and knew Professor Ranger wanted to add our small contribution by focusing here on his role as an activist scholar. Peter Limb, Terri Barnes, Terry Ranger, and Jim the Guardian. Diana Jeater previously wrote Brennan at the Conference organized in honor of an excellent academic biography of Ranger’s Terry held at the University of Illinois in 2010. contributions, and also reproduced an interview she did with Terry in the "Terence Fortunately, there are many useful ways to Ranger: Life as Historiography" History learn more about Terence Ranger’s life and Workshop Journal (Spring 2012) 73 (1): 193- work. His students, Jocelyn Alexander and 210. David Maxwell, wrote an obituary for Association of Concerned Africa Scholars Review 89 Spring 2015 1 Peter Limb has written an excellent review of Ranger’s impact in his "Terence Ranger, “Once in while there comes on stage a man African Studies and South African who dares to challenge orthodoxy.
    [Show full text]
  • Zimbabwe Rural Electrification Study
    Zimbabwe Rural Electrification Study ESM228 Energy Sector Management Assistance Programme Report 228/00 EJol AD March 2000 JOINT UNDP / WORLD BANK ENERGY SECTOR MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAMME (ESMAP) PURPOSE The Joint UNDP/World Bank E nergy Sector Management Assistance Programme (ESMAP) is a special global technical assistance program run as part of the World Bank's Energy, Mining and Telecommunications Department. ESMAP provides advice to governments on sustainable energy development. Established with the support of UNDP and bilateral official donors in 1983, it focuses on the role of energy in the development process with the objective of contributing to poverty alleviation, improving living conditions and preserving the environment in developing countries and transition economies. ESMAP centers its interventions on three priority areas: sector reform and restructuring; access to modern energy for the poorest; and promotion of sustainable energy practices. GOVERNANCE AND OPERATIONS ESMAP is governed by a Consultative Group (ESMAP CG) composed of representatives of the UNDP and World Bank, other donors, and development experts from regions benefiting from ESMAP's assistance. The ESMAP CG is chaired by a World Bank Vice President, and advised by a Technical Advisory Group (TAG) of four independent energy experts that reviews the Programme's strategic agenda, its work plan, and its achievements. ESMAP relies on a cadre of engineers, energy planners, and economists from the World Bank to conduct its activities under the guidance of the
    [Show full text]
  • Zimbabwe Market Study: Masvingo Province Report
    ©REUTERS/Philimon Bulawayo Bulawayo ©REUTERS/Philimon R E S E A R C H T E C H N I C A L A S S I S T A N C E C E N T E R January 2020 Zimbabwe Market Study: Masvingo Province Report Dominica Chingarande, Gift Mugano, Godfrey Chagwiza, Mabel Hungwe Acknowledgments The Research team expresses its gratitude to the various stakeholders who participated in this study in different capacities. Special gratitude goes to the District Food and Nutrition Committee members, the District Drought Relief Committee members, and various market actors in the province for providing invaluable local market information. We further express our gratitude to the ENSURE team in Masvingo for mobilizing beneficiaries of food assistance who in turn shared their lived experiences with food assistance. To these food assistance beneficiaries, we say thank you for freely sharing your experiences. Research Technical Assistance Center The Research Technical Assistance Center is a world-class research consortium of higher education institutions, generating rapid research for USAID to promote evidence-based policies and programs. The project is led by NORC at the University of Chicago in partnership with Arizona State University, Centro de Investigacin de la Universidad del Pacifico (Lima, Peru), Davis Management Group, the DevLab@Duke University, Forum One, the Institute of International Education, the Notre Dame Initiative for Global Development, Population Reference Bureau, the Resilient Africa Network at Makerere University (Kampala, Uganda), the United Negro College Fund, the University of Chicago, and the University of Illinois at Chicago. The Research Technical Assistance Center (RTAC) is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under the terms of contract no.
    [Show full text]
  • Gove]Inment Gazette
    GOVE] INMENT GAZETTE Published by Authority Vol. XCI, No. 15 28th FEBRUARY,2014 Price US$2,00 General Notice 29 of 2014. General Notice 3! of 2014. LEGAL PRACTITIONERS (COUNCIL FOR LEGAL LAND SURVEYACT (CHAPTER 20:72] EDUCATION) RULES, 1992 Decision on the Application for Cancellation of Portions of Notice of Examination Dates General Plan No. DT 2928 of Stands 6362-6549 and 6596-6649 - Hatcliffe Township: Salisbury District NOTICEis hereby giventhat, in terms of Rule 10(2) of the Legal Practitioners (Council for Legal Education) Rules, 1992, published FURTHERto the application notice of which appeared as in Statutory Instrument 447 of 1992, professional examinations for advertisement 476935f in the Government Gazette dated 22nd those with law degrees or diplomas but whodonot qualify to register November, 2013, the Minister of Lands and Rural Resettlement, as legalpractitioners in Zimbabwewill be held duringthe following in terms of section 47(3) of the Land Survey Act (Chapter 20:12], periods — hereby gives notice that he has consented to the cancellation of Winter Session, 16th June, 2014 to 27th June, 2014 portions of General Plan No. DT 2928 represented by Stands 6362 SummerSession, 17th November, 2014 to 28th November, 2014. and 6363 Hatcliffe Township and defined by the beacons: —6363A, Any person (“the candidate”) who qualifies and wishes to sit 6363B, 6363C, 6363D, 6363E and 6363A, situate in the district of for these professional examinations must send written notification Salisbury of his or her intention to do so to the Secretary of the Council for E. GUVAZA, Legal Education, Seventh Floor, East Wing, Century House East, 38, 28-2-2014.
    [Show full text]
  • An Agrarian History of the Mwenezi District, Zimbabwe, 1980-2004
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UWC Theses and Dissertations AN AGRARIAN HISTORY OF THE MWENEZI DISTRICT, ZIMBABWE, 1980-2004 KUDAKWASHE MANGANGA A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF M.PHIL IN LAND AND AGRARIAN STUDIES IN THE DEPARTMENT OF GOVERNMENT, UNIVERSITY OF THE WESTERN CAPE November 2007 DR. ALLISON GOEBEL (QUEEN’S UNIVERSITY, CANADA) DR. FRANK MATOSE (PLAAS, UWC) ii ABSTRACT An Agrarian History of the Mwenezi District, Zimbabwe, 1980-2004 Kudakwashe Manganga M. PHIL Thesis, Programme for Land and Agrarian Studies, Department of Government, University of the Western Cape. The thesis examines continuity and change in the agrarian history of the Mwenezi district, southern Zimbabwe since 1980. It analyses agrarian reforms, agrarian practices and development initiatives in the district and situates them in the localised livelihood strategies of different people within Dinhe Communal Area and Mangondi Resettlement Area in lieu of the Fast Track Land Reform Programme (FTLRP) since 2000. The thesis also examines the livelihood opportunities and challenges presented by the FTLRP to the inhabitants of Mwenezi. Land reform can be an opportunity that can help communities in drought prone districts like Mwenezi to attain food security and reduce dependence on food handouts from donor agencies and the government. The land reform presented the new farmers with multiple land use patterns and livelihood opportunities. In addition, the thesis locates the current programme in the context of previous post-colonial agrarian reforms in Mwenezi. It also emphasizes the importance of diversifying rural livelihood portfolios and argues for the establishment of smallholder irrigation schemes in Mwenezi using water from the Manyuchi dam, the fourth largest dam in Zimbabwe.
    [Show full text]
  • Zambezi River Safari and Houseboat Cruise 11-Day Zimbabwe Tour with 5-Day Lake Kariba Cruise
    Zambezi River Safari and Houseboat Cruise 11-Day Zimbabwe Tour with 5-Day Lake Kariba Cruise Zambezi River Safari and Houseboat Cruise Discover one of Africa’s hidden treasures on an unforgettable journey amid Zimbabwe’s natural beauty. Explore magnificent waterfalls, pristine national parks, and enjoy thrilling wildlife safaris. Discover one of Africa’s hidden treasures on an unforgettable journey amid Zimbabwe’s natural beauty. Explore magnificent waterfalls, pristine national parks, and enjoy thrilling wildlife safaris. The Victoria Falls are one of the world’s most stunning natural wonders. Lake Kariba is the largest human-made lake in the world by volume. These are just two of the highlights of your exclusive houseboat adventure in Zimbabwe! What Makes Your Journey Unique • Experience the mighty Zambezi River • Enjoy a unique and exclusive cruise on Lake Kariba • Discover Zimbabwe on a houseboat featuring nine cabins, all with panoramic views • Visit the immense Victoria Falls, also known as the Smoke that Thunders • Explore the Mana Pools National Park, a UNESCO World Heritage Site • Go on a safari in the Matusadona National Park, home to all big five game animals Dates Info and Booking Susanne Willeke E-Mail: [email protected] Itinerary Day 1., Zimbabwe Welcomes You Your first day in Zimbabwe immediately gets off to the right start—with a smile from your driver. Once you arrive at your lodge, you begin to explore its amenities and surrounding areas. After lunch, you take advantage of your private balcony and gaze at the unfettered panorama of the gorgeous Zambezi National Park. A nearby watering hole attracts local wildlife, making for some beautiful and spontaneous photography sessions.
    [Show full text]
  • Cfreptiles & Amphibians
    WWW.IRCF.ORG/REPTILESANDAMPHIBIANSJOURNALTABLE OF CONTENTS IRCF REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS IRCF REPTILES • VOL15, &NO AMPHIBIANS 4 • DEC 2008 189 • 23(1):51–61 • APR 2016 IRCF REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS CONSERVATION AND NATURAL HISTORY TABLE OF CONTENTS TRAVELOGUE FEATURE ARTICLES . Chasing Bullsnakes (Pituophis catenifer sayi) in Wisconsin: TexasOn the Road to Understanding Tech the Ecology and University Conservation of the Midwest’s Giant Serpent Students ...................... Joshua M. Kapfer 190 . The Shared History of Treeboas (Corallus grenadensis) and Humans on Grenada: A Hypothetical Excursion ............................................................................................................................Robert W. Henderson 198 RESEARCH ARTICLESTake On Zimbabwe . The Texas Horned Lizard in Central and Western Texas ....................... Emily Henry, Jason Brewer, Krista Mougey, and Gad Perry 204 . The Knight Anole (Anolis equestrisKaitlin) in Florida Danis, Ashley Hogan, and Kirsten Smith .............................................Texas BrianTech J. University, Camposano, KennethLubbock, L. Krysko, Texas Kevin 79409 M. Enge,([email protected]) Ellen M. Donlan, and Michael Granatosky 212 CONSERVATION ALERT n the night of. Wednesday,World’s Mammals in 14Crisis May ............................................................................................................................................................. 2014, 27 Texas three-week journey across South Africa 220 and Zimbabwe began Tech students tossed. More
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Gonarezhou Hunting Concession Boundries
    GONAREZHOU SAFARI AREAS IN SOUTH EASTERN ZIMBABWE The Gonarezhou Safari areas are hunting areas that are open/un fenced areas adjoined to the Gonarezhou National or Kruger National Park or the Mozambique National Park, these are massive areas made up of different concessions that form part of the collective Gonarezhou Hunting concessions, the ones that TAS offers are as follows from North to South. · Mahenye is a Gonarezhou hunting area that is situated on the North Eastern Boundary of the Gonarezhou National Park and has a further boundary with Mozambique. The Mahenye riverine jess bush including forests along the river is perfect territory for elephant bulls and buffalo bulls, this area has produced very big ivory in the past, the concession changed hands in 2018 allowing Take Aim Safaris the opportunity to market and sell these sought after Gonarezhou hunts, there has been very little to no hunting here for the last 10 years. The Northern parts of the Gonarezhou National Park that are adjoined and unfenced to Mahenye have this highest concentration of elephant bulls in the entire park, this is due to the volume of water being high and available feeding being high, there is lots of water on the hunting area side. Keys species of Mahenye are elephant, buffalo, hippo and crocodile. Mahenye borders on Mozambique and onto the Gonarezhou National Park in its North Eastern region of the park. The confluence of the Save River and Runde River is within the Mahenye Safari area including many large islands formed by the confluence of these rivers, most famous of these islands is Muchemeni Island, and also well known within the area is Chilo Gorge.
    [Show full text]