DOCSLIB.ORG

AC26/PC20 Doc. 7, Annex 5 – P

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
AC26/PC20 Doc. 7, Annex 5 – P AC26/PC20 Doc. 7 Annex 5 (English only / únicamente en inglés / seulement en anglais) EVALUATION OF THE REVIEW OF SIGNIFICANT TRADE: CASE STUDIES* 1. Hippopotamus amphibius Hippopotamus amphibius (common hippopotamus or hippo) is a large semi-aquatic African mammal, traded largely for its teeth, used as ivory, but also for its skin and as trophies. It was included in Appendix II in 1995. Range and overall status Range States: Angola, Benin, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Congo, Cote d’Ivoire, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Gabon, Gambia, Guinea, Guinea Bissau, Malawi, Mali, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria, Rwanda, Senegal, Somalia, South Africa, Sudan (and South Sudan), Swaziland, Togo, Uganda, United Republic of Tanzania, Zambia, Zimbabwe. The current status of H. amphibius according to the IUCN Red List is Vulnerable. The species was last assessed in 2008, having also been identified as Vulnerable in the assessment carried out in 2006. The total estimated population is thought to be somewhere between 125,000 and 148,000, with the largest proportion in Eastern and Southern African countries (Lewison and Oliver, 2008). The species was classified as Lower Risk/least concern in 1996. Review of Significant Trade Hippopotamus amphibius has been selected twice for the Review of Significant Trade, in 1998 and in 2008. In the first Review, range States were categorised (according to Decision 10.79) as d iii) or d ii) at AC 15 (1999). Those classified as d iii) were those for which preliminary review indicated that the level of trade was evidently not a problem. Range States classified as d ii) were those for which preliminary review had found insufficient information on which to base a judgement on the impact of trade. Botswana, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Malawi, Mozambique, Rwanda, South Africa, United Republic of Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe were classified as d ii) and all other range States as d iii). Recommendations were transmitted to range States considered to be d ii) in 2000 in which they were asked to respond providing; “the CITES Secretariat with detailed information on management measures in place to monitor wild populations of the species and implement the requirements of Article IV.2 of the Convention when authorizing exports.” Responses were considered at AC16 in 2000, by which time only Botswana had replied, and again at AC17 (2001). At AC17 Botswana, Mozambique, Zambia and Zimbabwe were considered to have provided satisfactory responses and were removed from the Review. The implementation of the review was discussed by the Standing Committee at SC45 in 2001. South Africa and the United Republic of Tanzania provided additional information and were removed from the process. The Standing Committee then recommended that no imports of specimens of H. amphibius should be accepted for those range State that had not responded to requests for information, namely Democratic Republic of the Congo, Rwanda and Malawi, until the actions recommended had been implemented. The Hippo was again selected for inclusion in the review at AC 2008 with all range States to be contacted except DRC and Rwanda. Range State responses were considered at AC24 (2009) with a number being removed from the process at that time. With the exception of South Africa, the major exporters of teeth or tusks were removed from the process based on information provided to the Secretariat. The Animals Committee provisionally selected the following countries as of Possible Concern: Cameroon, Mali, Mozambique, South Africa and Swaziland (AC25, Doc 9.4, 2011)1. * The geographical designations employed in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the CITES Secretariat or the United Nations Environment Programme concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The responsibility for the contents of the document rests exclusively with its author. 1 CITES documents including summary records, working group reports and information documents have been cited with the meeting number and document number followed by the date. Most can be found on the CITES website. They are not included in the reference list. AC26/PC20 Doc. 7, Annex 5 – p. 1 After review and consideration of additional information provided by range States at AC25, all countries were removed from the Review except Cameroon and Mozambique, both classified as Possible Concern. Recommendations were formulated for these countries to provide information on the basis of non-detriment findings and management. Range States subject to Recommendations Botswana Review Recommendations In the first Review Botswana was classified in category d ii) and recommendations were made asking the country to provide information. The country responded, indicating that no commercial trade was allowed, and was therefore removed from the Review. Botswana was regarded as Least Concern in the second Review. Status, trade and management The population in the mid-2000s was estimated at between 2000-4000 and believed to be decreasing, though not of conservation concern (Lewison and Oliver, 2008). The species is protected under the Wildlife Conservation Policy and no commercial trade is allowed. Killing of problem animals was reported in 2000 as rare (correspondence from the Director of Wildlife and National Parks to CITES Secretariat, June 2000, documented in AC16, 7.1, 2001). Trade had not resumed by the second Review. Impacts of the Review The Review appears to have had negligible impact on the status or management of hippos in Botswana. Cameroon Review Recommendations Not subject to recommendations in the first Review. In 2011 Cameroon was classified as Possible Concern and asked to provide information within 90 days for the following: a) The Management Authority should clarify what legal protection is afforded to this species in Cameroon and provide an explanation for the perceived discrepancies between reported Customs data (imports) and CITES data (exports) referred to in AC25 Doc 9.4; b) Provide available information to the Secretariat on the distribution, abundance and conservation status and any current management measures in place for H. amphibius in Cameroon; and c) Provide justification for, and details of, the scientific basis by which it has been established that the quantities of H. amphibius exported were not detrimental to the survival of the species and in compliance with Article IV, paragraphs 2 (a) and 3. Status, trade and management The species is currently thought to be widespread but at low density in Cameroon, occurring in Benoue national Park and River, Faro National Park, Kalamaloue National Park, Panmgar-Djerem National Park, Lake Lagdo and Lake Maga (Lewison and Oliver, 2008). The population is estimated at between 500-1500 individuals but the population trend is unknown, although concern for the conservation of this species has been noted with the main threat considered to be human-hippo conflict as a result of crop raiding (Lewison and Oliver, 2008). Levels of trade in hippo products have been relatively low from Cameroon with the primary traded products being teeth (recorded as whole) and trophies. There are some discrepancies in the reports received from importers and exporters, with importers generally reporting more trade in teeth and Cameroon reporting greater numbers of trophies. Part of this discrepancy may be because Cameroon generally reports on permits issued rather than actual trade. There have been some other hippo products traded from Cameroon, although only at very low numbers. Over the last 20 years this has included (according to importer only): feet (20), ivory pieces (30), tails (6) and skulls (5) along with some other products in even smaller quantities. Export of trophies from Cameroon AC26/PC20 Doc. 7, Annex 5 – p. 2 Export of teeth/tusks from Cameroon (kg) From 2006 hippos were “fully protected” by law (under Arrete 0648/MINFOF of 18/12/2006) within Cameroon, being listed as a class A species (i.e. a species which is rare or threatened with extinction). It is forbidden to kill hippos except where special authorization has been obtained for persons wishing to capture or keep these species for management purposes within the framework of scientific research or to protect people and their property. The species occurs in five national parks (Lewison and Oliver, 2008). The Cameroonian Management Authority have specified that levels of hunting for sport are less than 5 specimens per year (Cameroonian Management Authority in litt. to TRAFFIC, 2011). It would appear that trade has continued in both trophies and teeth being reported in trade. The level of trade is difficult to determine as importer and exporter reports varying significantly. Impacts of the Review Because the current review is on-going it is not yet possible to assess its impacts. However, the Management Authority of Cameroon has stated that terms of reference for a study on the status of H. amphibius have already been drafted but that that funding is not currently available (Management Authority of Cameroon in litt. to TRAFFIC, August 2011). Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) Review Recommendations In the first Review the Democratic Republic of the Congo was classified in category d ii) and recommendations were made asking the country to provide information. No response was received and in 2001 the Standing Committee recommended to Parties not to accept imports of specimens of H. amphibius from the country until the Management Authority provided adequate information regarding management measures in-place and AC26/PC20 Doc. 7, Annex 5 – p. 3 implementation of Article IV of the Convention. In 2008, at SC57, the Standing Committee withdrew this recommendation on the basis that the Hippo had become a fully protected species in DRC in 2006. Status, trade and management In 2006, the species was classified as Vulnerable on the IUCN Red List, having previously been of Lower Risk/least concern.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Collaborative Management Models in Africa
    Collaborative Management Models in Africa Peter Lindsey Mujon Baghai Introduction to the context behind the development of and rationale for CMPs in Africa Africa’s PAs represent potentially priceless assets due to the environmental services they provide and for their potential economic value via tourism However, the resources allocated for management of PAs are far below what is needed in most countries to unlock their potential A study in progress indicates that of 22 countries assessed, half have average PA management budgets of <10% of what is needed for effective management (Lindsey et al. in prep) This means that many countries will lose their wildlife assets before ever really being able to benefit from them So why is there such under-investment? Two big reasons - a) competing needs and overall budget shortages; b) a high burden of PAs relative to wealth However, in some cases underinvestment may be due to: ● Misconceptions that PAs can pay for themselves on a park level ● Lack of appreciation among policy makers that PAs need investment to yield economic dividends This mistake has grave consequences… This means that in most countries, PA networks are not close to delivering their potential: • Economic value • Social value • Ecological value Africa’s PAs are under growing pressure from an array of threats Ed Sayer ProtectedInsights areas fromare becoming recent rapidly research depleted in many areas There is a case for elevated support for Africa’s PA network from African governments But also a case for greater investment from
    [Show full text]
  • Private Investments to Support Protected Areas: Experiences from Malawi; Presented at the World Parks Congress
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264410164 Private Investments to Support Protected Areas: Experiences from Malawi; Presented at the World Parks Congress... Conference Paper · September 2003 DOI: 10.13140/2.1.4808.5129 CITATIONS READS 0 201 1 author: Daulos Mauambeta EnviroConsult Services 7 PUBLICATIONS 17 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE All content following this page was uploaded by Daulos Mauambeta on 01 August 2014. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. All in-text references underlined in blue are added to the original document and are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately. Vth World Parks Congress: Sustainable Finance Stream September 2003 • Durban, South Africa Institutions Session Institutional Arrangements for Financing Protected Areas Panel C Private investments to support protected areas Private Investments to Support Protected Areas: Experiences from Malawi Daulos D.C. Mauambeta. Executive Director Wildlife and Environmental Society of Malawi. Private Bag 578. Limbe, MALAWI. ph: (265) 164-3428, fax: (265) 164-3502, cell: (265) 991-4540. E-mail: [email protected] / [email protected] Abstract The role of private investments in supporting protected areas in Malawi cannot be overemphasized. The Government of Malawi’s Wildlife Policy (Malawi Ministry of Tourism, Parks and Wildlife 2000, pp2, 4) stresses the “development of partnerships with all interested parties to effectively manage wildlife both inside and outside protected areas and the encouragement of the participation of local communities, entrepreneurs, Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) and any other party with an interest in wildlife conservation”.
    [Show full text]
  • African Parks 2 African Parks
    African Parks 2 African Parks African Parks is a non-profit conservation organisation that takes on the total responsibility for the rehabilitation and long-term management of national parks in partnership with governments and local communities. By adopting a business approach to conservation, supported by donor funding, we aim to rehabilitate each park making them ecologically, socially and financially sustainable in the long-term. Founded in 2000, African Parks currently has 15 parks under management in nine countries – Benin, Central African Republic, Chad, the Democratic Republic of Congo, the Republic of Congo, Malawi, Mozambique, Rwanda and Zambia. More than 10.5 million hectares are under our protection. We also maintain a strong focus on economic development and poverty alleviation in neighbouring communities, ensuring that they benefit from the park’s existence. Our goal is to manage 20 parks by 2020, and because of the geographic spread and representation of different ecosystems, this will be the largest and the most ecologically diverse portfolio of parks under management by any one organisation across Africa. Black lechwe in Bangweulu Wetlands in Zambia © Lorenz Fischer The Challenge The world’s wild and functioning ecosystems are fundamental to the survival of both people and wildlife. We are in the midst of a global conservation crisis resulting in the catastrophic loss of wildlife and wild places. Protected areas are facing a critical period where the number of well-managed parks is fast declining, and many are simply ‘paper parks’ – they exist on maps but in reality have disappeared. The driving forces of this conservation crisis is the human demand for: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Last Interglacial (MIS 5) Ungulate Assemblage from the Central Iberian Peninsula: the Camino Cave (Pinilla Del Valle, Madrid, Spain)
    Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 374 (2013) 327–337 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/palaeo Last Interglacial (MIS 5) ungulate assemblage from the Central Iberian Peninsula: The Camino Cave (Pinilla del Valle, Madrid, Spain) Diego J. Álvarez-Lao a,⁎, Juan L. Arsuaga b,c, Enrique Baquedano d, Alfredo Pérez-González e a Área de Paleontología, Departamento de Geología, Universidad de Oviedo, C/Jesús Arias de Velasco, s/n, 33005 Oviedo, Spain b Centro Mixto UCM-ISCIII de Evolución y Comportamiento Humanos, C/Sinesio Delgado, 4, 28029 Madrid, Spain c Departamento de Paleontología, Facultad de Ciencias Geológicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria, 28040 Madrid, Spain d Museo Arqueológico Regional de la Comunidad de Madrid, Plaza de las Bernardas, s/n, 28801-Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain e Centro Nacional de Investigación sobre la Evolución Humana (CENIEH), Paseo Sierra de Atapuerca, s/n, 09002 Burgos, Spain article info abstract Article history: The fossil assemblage from the Camino Cave, corresponding to the late MIS 5, constitutes a key record to un- Received 2 November 2012 derstand the faunal composition of Central Iberia during the last Interglacial. Moreover, the largest Iberian Received in revised form 21 January 2013 fallow deer fossil population was recovered here. Other ungulate species present at this assemblage include Accepted 31 January 2013 red deer, roe deer, aurochs, chamois, wild boar, horse and steppe rhinoceros; carnivores and Neanderthals Available online 13 February 2013 are also present. The origin of the accumulation has been interpreted as a hyena den. Abundant fallow deer skeletal elements allowed to statistically compare the Camino Cave fossils with other Keywords: Early Late Pleistocene Pleistocene and Holocene European populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Hyphaene Petersiana Klotzsch Ex Mart. [ 1362 ]
    This report was generated from the SEPASAL database ( www.kew.org/ceb/sepasal ) in August 2007. This database is freely available to members of the public. SEPASAL is a database and enquiry service about useful "wild" and semi-domesticated plants of tropical and subtropical drylands, developed and maintained at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. "Useful" includes plants which humans eat, use as medicine, feed to animals, make things from, use as fuel, and many other uses. Since 2004, there has been a Namibian SEPASAL team, based at the National Botanical Research Institute of the Ministry of Agriculture which has been updating the information on Namibian species from Namibian and southern African literature and unpublished sources. By August 2007, over 700 Namibian species had been updated. Work on updating species information, and adding new species to the database, is ongoing. It may be worth visiting the web site and querying the database to obtain the latest information for this species. Internet SEPASAL New query Edit query View query results Display help In names list include: synonyms vernacular names and display: 10 names per page Your query found 1 taxon Hyphaene petersiana Klotzsch ex Mart. [ 1362 ] Family: PALMAE Synonyms Hyphaene benguellensis Welw. Hyphaene benguellensis Welw. var. plagiocarpa (Dammer)Furtado Hyphaene benguellensis Welw. var. ventricosa (Kirk)Furtado Hyphaene ventricosa J.Kirk Vernacular names (East Africa) [nuts] dum [ 2357 ] (Zimbabwe) murara [ 3023 ], ilala [ 3030 ] Afrikaans (Namibia) makalanie-palm [ 5083
    [Show full text]
  • The Hippopotamus 4
    lesson The Hippopotamus 4 Before You Read Look at the picture. Read the sentences. Check (✔) True, False, or Don’t Know. True False Don’t Know 1. The hippopotamus is big. 2. It lives in the snow and ice. 3. It has wings and a tail. 15 Lesson 4: The Hippopotamus 4 The Hippopotamus The hippopotamus, or hippo, lives in the hot part of Africa. It is a mammal. That is, its babies are born alive, and they drink milk from the mother’s body. The hippopotamus is a large animal. It weighs four big tons. Its stomach is seven meters long, and it eats only plants. It is a mammal, but it spends a lot of time in the water. During the day, it sleeps beside a river or a lake. at the side of Sometimes it wakes up. Then it goes under the water to get some plants for food. It can close its nose and stay under water for ten minutes. Its ears, eyes, and nose are high up on its head. It can stay with its body under the water and only its ears, eyes, and nose above the water. over Then it can breathe the air. At night, the hippo walks on the land and looks for food. It never goes very far from the water. A baby hippo often stands on its mother’s back. The mother looks for food underwater. The baby rides on her back above the water. 16 Unit 1: Animals a Vocabulary Put the right word in each blank. The sentences are from the text.
    [Show full text]
  • African Parks AR2017 – Majete
    22 THE PARKS | MAJETE AFRICAN PARKS | ANNUAL REPORT 2017 23 MALAWI Majete Wildlife Reserve 700 km² African Parks Project since 2003 Government Partner: Malawi Department of National Parks and Wildlife (DNPW) The Wyss Foundation and WWF-Belgium were major funders in 2017 A small herd of elephants move through Majete Wildlife Reserve in Malawi. © Pete McBride 24 THE PARKS | MAJETE AFRICAN PARKS | ANNUAL REPORT 2017 25 Majete CRAIG HAY | PARK MANAGER MALAWI – Over just 14 years, Majete has transformed from a once empty forest with no employment or tourism and only a few remaining antelope within its perimeter, to a productive and flourishing haven for Africa’s most iconic wildlife, generating revenue and benefits for local communities. Decades of lawlessness and poaching had seen the reserve’s wildlife, including elephants, completely eradicated by the 1990’s. But this all changed in 2003, when African Parks signed a 25-year management agreement with the Department of National Parks and Wildlife (DNPW) to manage Majete, the first park to enter our portfolio. We immediately began to revive the park through a series of species reintroductions: rhinos in 2003, elephants in 2006 and lions in 2012, bringing back 2,900 animals overall representing 14 different species. With their return, tourists started to come to the park, and much needed revenue followed, feeding back into the management of the reserve and supporting local communities. Today, Majete is flourishing, so much so that wildlife is being moved to populate other parks and private reserves within the country. We've maintained a 14-year track record of zero poaching of rhinos and elephants since their introduction; 154 elephants and 345 other animals were successfully translocated to Nkhotakota Wildlife Reserve completing the historic ‘500 Elephants’ translocation, and tourism increased 14 percent from last year, with over 9,000 visitors, half of whom were Malawian nationals bringing in over US$550,000 to the reserve and communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Carnivore Research Malawi
    CARNIVORE RESEARCH MALAWI VOLUNTEER PROGRAMME INFORMATION WWW.CARNIVORERESEARCHMALAWI.ORG A Project of Conservation Research Africa Welcome to the CRM volunteer programme Thank you for your interest in CRM. Volunteers can play a vital role in helping us to achieve our aims. We need as much help as we can get to make a difference for wild dogs and their habitats in Africa, we are a small team with a big task ahead. In return it is our hope that volunteers will enjoy volunteering with us, meet like-minded people and develop some new skills. 2. Why Malawi? Malawi is a unique county with remnant populations of carnivores in each national park and very little conservation research. CRM are the only carnivore research organisation working in Malawi to conserve carnivores across the country. CRM started working in Malawi with a focus on the African wild dog (Lycaon pictus). The African wild dog is one of Africa’s most endangered carnivores and have undergone severe declines in the last 50 years and viable populations are believed to be limited to only six of 34 previous range countries. The conservation of remaining wild dog populations is outlined as the highest priority for the conservation of the species (Woodroffe et al. 1997). The presence of a unknown breeding population of wild dogs, low densities of competing predators, and the potential to enhance the link to the Zambian population make the Malawi dog population particularly important. Research is urgently required to assess the status of the Malawi population and determine the site-specific ecological factors limiting wild dogs to facilitate the conservation of wild dogs in Malawi.
    [Show full text]
  • San Andrés, Old Providence and Santa Catalina (Caribbean Sea, Colombia)
    REEF ENVIRONMENTS AND GEOLOGY OF AN OCEANIC ARCHIPELAGO: SAN ANDRÉS, OLD PROVIDENCE AND SANTA CATALINA (CARIBBEAN SEA, COLOMBIA) with Field Guide JÓRN GEISTER Y JUAN MANUEL DÍAZ República de Colombia MINISTERIO DE MINAS Y ENERGÍA INSTITUTO COLOMBIANO DE GEOLOGÍA Y MINERÍA INGEOMINAS REEF ENVIRONMENTS AND GEOLOGY OF AN OCEANIC ARCHIPELAGO: SAN ANDRÉS, OLD PROVIDENCE AND SANTA. CATALINA (CARIBBEAN SEA, COLOMBIA with FIELD GUIDE) INGEOMINAS 2007 DIAGONAL 53 N°34-53 www.ingeominas.gov.co DIRECTOR GENERAL MARIO BALLESTEROS MEJÍA SECRETARIO GENERAL EDWIN GONZÁLEZ MORENO DIRECTOR SERVICIO GEOLÓGICO CÉSAR DAVID LÓPEZ ARENAS DIRECTOR SERVICIO MINERO (e) EDWARD ADAN FRANCO GAMBOA SUBDIRECTOR DE GEOLOGÍA BÁSICA ORLANDO NAVAS CAMACHO COORDINADORA GRUPO PARTICIPACIÓN CIUDADANA, ATENCIÓN AL CLIENTE Y COMUNICACIONES SANDRA ORTIZ ÁNGEL AUTORES: 315RN GEISTER Y JUAN MANUEL DÍAZ REVISIÓN EDITORIAL HUMBERTO GONZÁLEZ CARMEN ROSA CASTIBLANCO DISEÑO Y DIAGRAMACIÓN GUSTAVO VEJARANO MATIZ J SILVIA GUTIÉRREZ PORTADA: Foto: Estación en el mar Cl. San Andrés: Pared vertical de Bocatora Hole a -30 m. El coral Montastraea sp. adoptó una forma plana. Agosto de 1998. IMPRESIÓN IMPRENTA NACIONAL DE COLOMBIA CONTENT PREFACE 7 1. GENERAL BACKGROUND 8 2. STRUCTURAL SETTING AND REGIONAL GEOLOGY OF THE ARCHIPÉLAGO 9 2.1 Caribbean Piafe 9 2.2 Upper and Lower Nicaraguan Rises 9 2.3 Hess Escarpment and Colombia Basin 11 2.4 Islands and atolls of the Archipelago 12 3. CLIMATE AND OCEANOGRAPHY 14 4. GENERAL CHARACTERS OF WESTERN CARIBBEAN OCEANIC REEF COMPLEXE (fig. 7)
    [Show full text]
  • Working Paper Series
    Working Paper No. 58, 2013 Landscapes of Freedom and Inequality Environmental Histories of the Pacific and Caribbean Coasts of Colombia Claudia Leal and Shawn Van Ausdal Working Paper Series desiguALdades.net Research Network on Interdependent Inequalities in Latin America desiguALdades.net Working Paper Series Published by desiguALdades.net International Research Network on Interdependent Inequalities in Latin America The desiguALdades.net Working Paper Series serves to disseminate first results of ongoing research projects in order to encourage the exchange of ideas and academic debate. Inclusion of a paper in the desiguALdades.net Working Paper Series does not constitute publication and should not limit publication in any other venue. Copyright remains with the authors. Copyright for this edition: Claudia Leal and Shawn Van Ausdal Editing and Production: Barbara Göbel / Laura Kemmer / Paul Talcott All working papers are available free of charge on our website www.desiguALdades.net. Leal, Claudia and Van Ausdal, Shawn 2013: “Landscapes of Freedom and Inequality: Environmental Histories of the Pacific and Caribbean Coasts of Colombia”, desiguALdades.net Working Paper Series 58, Berlin: desiguALdades.net International Research Network on Interdependent Inequalities in Latin America. The paper was produced by Claudia Leal and Shawn Van Ausdal as a result of discussions at desiguALdades.net in the context of a conference (11/2012) and a workshop (08/2013). desiguALdades.net International Research Network on Interdependent Inequalities in Latin America cannot be held responsible for errors or any consequences arising from the use of information contained in this Working Paper; the views and opinions expressed are solely those of the author or authors and do not necessarily reflect those of desiguALdades.net.
    [Show full text]
  • Search Bullet No
    SEARCH BULLET NO. 236 ashineon, D.C., U.S.A. November 1979 I Poior t Md,tiniq"Q - CARI88EAN g o i 5r LvuajJ =& 8' SEA v'"i'"r? aJ,bdd-,D The White Horra , VENEZUELA - Jort Vai Gwat rcbw '& .; ",& THE VIRGIN ISLANDS Scale of Mlles III I d I bog Rod Heights In Feet SOME ASPECTS OF THE ECOLOGY OF REEFS SURROUNDING ANEGADA, BRITISH VIRGIIY ISLANDS 1. 2. by R.P. Dunne and B.E. Brown Introductory Description Anegada is a most unique island from many aspects. Northernmost of the American and British Virgin Islands and easternmost of the Greater Antilles, it is a flat limestone island, 17 km long and 4 km wide with a total area of about 14.94 square miles (9,567 acres 54 sq km), It is set aside from the other British Virgin Islands, being some 19 km from Virgin Gorda, its closest neighbour. It lies in distinct contrast to the volcanic and mountainous landscapes of the Virgin Group, with a maximum elevation of only 8 metres, To the north and east (windward side) the island is edged by extensive reefs beyond which stretches the Atlantic Ocean. On the leeward side, a shallow sea (2 to 8 m) separates Anegada from the main Virgin Island Group. His tory Schmburgk (1832) is the earliest authority on the island, having visited it in 1831 when he completed a most extensive survey. He writes: 'Of its history little is known; there is no likelihood that it was settled early. Ere Labat, the only early writer who speaks of the Lesser West India islands, observes, that aborigines used it as an occasional rendezvous, where they procured great quantities of conchs (~trombusgigas); and large piles of these shells are still to be seen at the east end of the island, but nowhere else ; which seems to prove decidedly that it was not permanently accupied, but merely resorted to from time to time.
    [Show full text]
  • The Phylogeny and Taxonomy of Hippopotamidae (Mammalia: Artiodactyla): a Review Based on Morphology and Cladistic Analysis
    Blackwell Science, LtdOxford, UKZOJZoological Journal of the Linnean Society0024-4082The Lin- nean Society of London, 2005? 2005 143? 126 Original Article J.-R. BOISSERIEHIPPOPOTAMIDAE PHYLOGENY AND TAXONOMY Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2005, 143, 1–26. With 11 figures The phylogeny and taxonomy of Hippopotamidae (Mammalia: Artiodactyla): a review based on morphology and cladistic analysis JEAN-RENAUD BOISSERIE1,2* 1Laboratoire de Géobiologie, Biochronologie et Paléontologie Humaine, UMR CNRS 6046, Université de Poitiers, 40 avenue du Recteur, Pineau 86022 Cedex, France 2Laboratory for Human Evolutionary Studies, Department of Integrative Biology, Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California at Berkeley, 3101 Valley Life Science Building, Berkeley, CA 94720-3160, USA Received August 2003; accepted for publication June 2004 The phylogeny and taxonomy of the whole family Hippopotamidae is in need of reconsideration, the present confu- sion obstructing palaeoecology and palaeobiogeography studies of these Neogene mammals. The revision of the Hip- popotamidae initiated here deals with the last 8 Myr of African and Asian species. The first thorough cladistic analysis of the family is presented here. The outcome of this analysis, including 37 morphological characters coded for 15 extant and fossil taxa, as well as non-coded features of mandibular morphology, was used to reconstruct broad outlines of hippo phylogeny. Distinct lineages within the paraphyletic genus Hexaprotodon are recognized and char- acterized. In order to harmonize taxonomy and phylogeny, two new genera are created. The genus name Choeropsis is re-validated for the extant Liberian hippo. The nomen Hexaprotodon is restricted to the fossil lineage mostly known in Asia, but also including at least one African species.
    [Show full text]