Corel Complaint

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Corel Complaint IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ------------------------------------------------------x : IN RE: COREL CORPORATION : Civil Action No: 00-CV-1257 INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION : ------------------------------------------------------x : THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: : All Actions : ------------------------------------------------------x CONSOLIDATED AND AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT Lead Plaintiffs, Fred Spagnola, Michael Perron and David Chavez, (“Plaintiffs” or “Lead Plaintiffs”) individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, allege upon personal knowledge as to themselves and their own acts, and as to all other matters upon the investigation made by and through their counsel, which included, among other things, a review of Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filings, news reports, press releases, transcripts and other publicly available information, as follows: JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. This action arises under Section 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) and Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5, promulgated thereunder by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78t(a). 2. This Court has jurisdiction over the action pursuant to Section 27 of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. §78aa, and 28 U.S.C. §1331 and 1337. 3. Venue is proper in this judicial district pursuant to Section 27 of the Exchange Act and 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). Defendant Corel Corporation (“Corel” or the “Company”) is a Canadian corporation headquartered in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Corel’s stock is traded on the NASDAQ national exchange under the ticker CORL. Corel has a substantial business presence, and many of the acts complained of, including the dissemination to the investing public of materially false and misleading information occurred in this District. Plaintiff Fred Spagnola resides in this District, and purchased his shares of Corel stock in this District, as do many members of the plaintiff Class. 4. In connection with the acts and conduct alleged in this Complaint, defendants, directly or indirectly, used the means and instrumentalities of interstate commerce, including the United States mails, telephone communications, and the facilities of the national securities exchanges. NATURE OF ACTION 5. This class action is brought on behalf of the Class as defined below, to recover damages caused to plaintiff and the Class by defendants' violations of the federal securities laws. 6. During the Class Period, defendants engaged in a plan, scheme and course of conduct which was designed to, and did: a. deceive the investing public, including Plaintiffs and other members of the Class, concerning the financial condition and performance of the Company, including, among other things, the nature and extent of the actual sales made, and expenses incurred by the Company during the Class Period; b. artificially inflate the market price of Corel's common stock during the Class Period; and c. cause Plaintiffs and other members of the Class to purchase Corel common stock at inflated prices. 7. In furtherance of this plan and course of conduct, defendants issued or caused to be issued during the Class Period a series of false and misleading public statements and took the actions alleged herein, which operated as a fraud and deceit upon the market for the Company's stock, Plaintiffs 2 and the other members of the Class. THE PARTIES 8. Pursuant to the Court’s Order dated June 28, 2000, and entered July 5, 2000, the following persons were appointed to serve as Lead Plaintiffs in this action: Fred Spagnola, Michael Perron and David Chavez. Each of the Lead Plaintiffs made purchases of Corel common stock at inflated prices during the Class Period and suffered losses as a result of defendants’ conduct. 9. Defendant Corel is a Canadian corporation headquartered at 1600 Carling Avenue, Ottowa, Ontario, Canada. Corel has two U.S. subsidiaries – Corel, Inc. and Corel Corporation, (U.S.A.) located at 567 Timpangos Parkway, Orem, Utah 84507. Corel also has a one third ownership interest in LinuxForce Inc. of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, which it acquired during the Class Period. Corel’s stock is traded on the NASDAQ national exchange under the ticker CORL, and also on the Toronto Stock Exchange. Corel describes itself as a company which develops, manufactures, licenses, sells and supports a wide range of software products including graphics, business productivity, consumer and video applications as well as network computers. According to Corel’s 1998 Form 10-K, Corel products are available for users of most PC’s, Apple Macintosh, UNIX based and LINUX based systems. 10. Defendant Dr. Michael C.J. Cowpland, is and at all relevant times has been the Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Defendant Cowpland signed the Company’s Form 10-K’s filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) during the Class Period. 11. Defendant Cowpland, by reason of his shareholdings, direct and substantial management position and responsibilities during the relevant time of this Complaint, was a “controlling person” of Corel within the meaning of Section 20 of the Exchange Act, and had the power and 3 influence to control Corel, and exercised such control to cause the Company to engage in the violations of law and improper practices complained of herein. Cowpland, because of his position as an officer and director of Corel, had access to material adverse non-public information about the Company’s business, operations, financial condition and performance alleged herein. 12. As an officer and director of a publicly-held company, Cowpland had a duty at all relevant times to disseminate timely, accurate, truthful and complete information with respect to the Company's business, operations, financial condition, performance and future prospects, so that, among other things, the market price of the Company's stock would be based on truthful, accurate and complete information. As hereinafter alleged, Cowpland violated this duty and obligation during the Class Period. CLASS ACTION ALLEGATIONS 13. Plaintiffs bring this action as a class action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, on behalf of a class (the “Class”) consisting of all U.S. citizens who purchased Corel common stock on the NASDAQ national exchange at any time from December 7, 1999, through and including March 20, 2000 (the “Class Period”), and who were damaged thereby. Excluded from the Class are defendants, their subsidiaries and affiliates, and members of defendant Cowpland’s immediate family. 14. During the Class Period, Plaintiffs and the other members of the Class purchased shares of Corel common stock in the open market without knowledge of the misconduct of defendants alleged in this Complaint, and suffered damages as a result. Plaintiffs and each member of the Class relied, directly or indirectly, upon defendants' public reports, press releases, and other public statements, as more fully described below, and/or upon the integrity of the market for Corel common stock. 15. The Class is so numerous that joinder of all Class members is impracticable. While the exact number of Class members is unknown to Plaintiffs at this time and can only be ascertained from 4 the records maintained by Corel or its agents, as of February 21, 2000, the Company estimated that the number of beneficial holders of Corel common shares approximated 110,000 holders. 16. Shares of Corel common stock have been actively traded during the Class Period in an open and efficient market on the National Association of Securities Dealers Automatic Quotation system ("NASDAQ"). 17. Plaintiffs’ claims are typical of the claims of the members of the Class, since all members of the Class purchased shares of Corel common stock during the Class Period and sustained damages arising out of defendants' wrongful conduct in violation of federal securities laws as alleged herein. 18. Plaintiffs will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the members of the Class. Plaintiffs have retained counsel competent and experienced in prosecuting class actions and securities litigation, and plaintiffs have no interests antagonistic to, or in conflict with, the other members of the Class. 19. A class action is superior to other available methods for the fair and efficient adjudication of this controversy. Joinder of all Class members is impracticable. The likelihood of individual Class members prosecuting separate individual claims is remote. Since the damages suffered by individual Class members may be relatively small, the expense and burden of individual litigation makes it impracticable for Class members individually to seek redress for the wrongs done to them. No unusual difficulties are likely to be encountered in the management of this class action. 20. There are questions of law and fact common to the members of the Class which predominate over any questions affecting any individual members. These common questions of law and fact include, among others: a. whether defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and 5 SEC Rule 10-b-5; b. whether defendants participated in and/or conspired in the common course of conduct complained of herein; c. whether documents, releases, reports, and statements disseminated to the investing public during the Class Period omitted to state or misrepresented material facts about the financial results of Corel; d. whether defendants acted with knowledge or with reckless disregard for the truth in misrepresenting and/or omitting to state material facts about the business and financial results of Corel; e. whether, during the Class Period, the market price of Corel common stock was artificially inflated due to the material misrepresentations and/or non-disclosures complained of herein; and, f. whether the members of the Class have sustained damages, and, if so, the proper measure thereof. 21. Plaintiffs will rely, in part, upon the presumption of reliance established by the fraud-on- the-market doctrine, in that: a.
Recommended publications
  • OS/2 Warp Catalogue
    The OS/2 Software Source: www.xeu.com/blueware/ The OS/2 Warp Catalogue The Hottest Java The Strongest Platform The OS/2 Warp Catalogue In This Catalogue Anti-virus .......................................... 4 Backup .............................................. 4 It’s Java Time CD-ROMs ........................................ 4 Communications ........................ 6 Just when you thought that OS/2 was on its way back, it is receiving a strong Database Management .......... 9 infusion from Java and the internet. Development Tools ................ 10 As Dr. Michael Cowpland, president and CEO of Corel Disk Compression .................. 14 Corporation put it: “This platform is indeed one of the Games & Entertainment ..... 19 OS/2 Warp: best operating system solutions in which to run The Hottest Corel Office for Java (http://officeforjava.corel.com/), Graphics & Multimedia ........ 20 a suite of applications that is setting the standard for The Operating System ......... 21 Java Around! Java-based office suites, and marks another milestone OS/2 Warp is developing in the evolution of Java as a whole.” Productivity ................................. 21 into a strong and speedy Programmer’s Editors .......... 23 foundation for Java. The OS/2 Warp 4.0 Java implementation was recently This perfect fit is nicely updated with a better Virtual Machine (VM) and a REXX Programming ................ 23 symbolized by “Carmen” speedy Just In Time (JIT) compiler. Also, even older OS/2 the two-sided coffee cup versions, including Warp 3.0, Warp Connect Utilities & Tools ........................ 24 by dutch ceramist Erik-Jan |and Warp Server are now fully able to suppport Java. Books ............................................. 28 Kwakkel on the cover page. But the great work does not end with that: you can Registration Service .............
    [Show full text]
  • LEGAL TECHNOLOGY Insider
    CHARLES CHRISTIAN’s LEGAL TECHNOLOGY iNSIDER THE ESSENTIAL GUIDE TO WHAT’S HOT (AND WHAT’S NOT) IN LAW OFFICE SYSTEMS NT FEVER AS ➦ other firms that had only recently moved into a Windows 3x environment. BERWINS PUTS Windows NT also made an impact on this year’s Solicitors & Legal Office IT ON DESKTOP Exhibition at the Barbican, with not just It looks like 1996 will be remembered the big suppliers, such as Axxia Systems as the year the legal market finally and AIM Professional, talking about their embraced Microsoft Windows NT, both forthcoming NT launches but also a IN THIS as a server and as a desktop platform. growing number of smaller suppliers now EDITIONÉ In addition to NT clearly being “flavour committed to this route. This month sees of the month” at the recent Barbican Hereford-based Pracctice commence live Avenue back on the Exhibition, the last few days have also beta testing of its Windows NT upgrade at right road ? … 2 seen two major NT-based orders being two of its user firms. placed. Jobs crisis ahead Fareham-based solicitors Blake ☞ Comment… Ten months ago Dundas for legal IT Lapthorn has just signed a £60,000 deal & Wilson in Scotland rejected Windows sector ?… 3 with Lawtech for the supply of the NT as its practice wide platform because Windows NT version of The Beaver of doubts about performance. Today it GroupWise set for Corporation’s Arms debt recovery system. seems no-one can get enough of NT. And autumn launch… 4 This was promptly topped by its not just in the legal market.
    [Show full text]
  • Explain the Principles of Business and the Role of Information Technology 114050
    Explain the principles of business and the role of information technology 114050 PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD This unit standard is intended: To provide conceptual knowledge of the areas covered For those working in, or entering the workplace in the area of Information Technology As additional knowledge for those wanting to understand the areas covered People credited with this unit standard are able to: Describe fundamental business concepts Describe systems theory with respect to information systems Explain how IT can be used in business Explain the relationship between a business and its data requirements The performance of all elements is to a standard that allows for further learning in this area. LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING The credit value of this unit is based on a person having the prior knowledge and skills to: Demonstrate an understanding of fundamental Communication Skills at NQF Level 4 Demonstrate an understanding of fundamental Mathematics (at least NQF Level 3) NC: IT: SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT AUTHOR: LEARNER MANUAL REL DATE: 27/01/2020 REV DATE: 01/01/2023 DOC REF: 48872 LM MOD 2 V-1 PAGE 68 INDEX Competence Requirements Page Unit Standard 114050 alignment index Here you will find the different outcomes explained which you need to be 70 proved competent in, in order to complete the Unit Standard 114050. Unit Standard 114050 72 Describe fundamental business concepts 75 Describe systems theory with respect to information systems 86 Explain how IT can be used in business 96 Explain the relationship between a business and its information needs 108 Self-assessment Once you have completed all the questions after being facilitated, you need to check the progress you have made.
    [Show full text]
  • Capturing Value from Gpns: Locally Led Strategic Coupling in Ottawa's
    Capturing Value from GPNs: Locally Led Strategic Coupling in Ottawa’s Digital Sector DRAFT - 20 July 2017 Brendan Haley, Tijs Creutzberg, Todd Julie Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 2 Global Production Networks and Strategic Coupling ................................................................ 2 2.1 Strategic Coupling and Regional Economic Development .............................................. 2 2.2 Ottawa Case Study Motivation and Methodology ............................................................ 4 3 The Evolution and Vulnerabilities of Ottawa’s Digital Sector .................................................. 7 3.1 Nortel as an Example of a Forced De-Coupling ............................................................... 7 3.2 The Recoupling of Ottawa’s Assets by way of Inward Foreign Direct Investment ......... 8 3.3 Vulnerabilities of a Regional ‘R&D Branch Plant’ Economy........................................ 10 4 Strategic Coupling as an Approach Regional Economic Development ................................... 11 4.1 Centre of Excellence for Next Generation Networks (CENGN) .................................... 13 4.2 Wesley Clover, L-Spark & Alacrity ............................................................................... 15 5 Discussion ................................................................................................................................ 17 5.1 The Importance
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Managing the New Competition A. Clusters B. Ottawa: Silicon Valley North C
    1. Managing the New Competition a. Clusters b. Ottawa: Silicon Valley North c. Bell Northern/Northern Telecom d. Spin Offs e. Considering Clusters 2. “Clusters” a. “...geographically proximate group of interconnected companies and associated institutions in a particular field linked by commonalities and complementarities.” (Porter) b. Why interest? Innovation and global successs i. Fostering Entrepeneurship, Boosting Innovation, Drivers of National Innovation Systems (OECD) ii. US Silicon Valley 3. Ottawa: Silicon Valley North a. By 1980 - 85 firms, 15,000 employees; by 2000 1200 firms, 85,000 (collapse? 2003, 1500 65,000) b. Strong research focus – information technology: ***telecommunications***, semiconductors, software, photonics c. 90% of Caanda’s R&D in industrial telecommunications d. International markets (only 1/3 product for national market) 4. Bell Northern/Northern Telecom a. Strategic response of Bell Canada and Northern Electric to US 1956 AT&T/Bell consent decree b. Pre-1956 dependent on US Bell Labs, manufacture for Bell Canada c. 1961 - set up lab in Ottawa i. National Research Council (1916) spearheads science and research in WW II, 1948 spin off: Computing Devices Ltd to produce military computer hardware ii. Proximity to universities, and to Montreal headquarters 5. Bell Northern/Northern Telecom a. 1970-1982, from 10% to 82% of sales its own products b. R&D “Canadian” successes i. Switching systems for small towns and rural areas (markets not just in Canada) c. Bell Northern Research (1969-71) i. 70% Northern and 30% Bell ii. Manufacture for US and international markets d. Digital World i. 1976 - would produce full line of digital products 1976-1980 - first mover ii.
    [Show full text]
  • December 16, 1996 / PC Week
    VOLUME 13 NUMBER 50 The National Newspaper of Corporate Computing $3.95 Making the Connection Microsoft developing cache software for improving Web- based database access. PAGE 6 Bridging the Gap Startup’s desktop device could bridge Wintel, NC worlds. PAGE 8 BREAKING STORIES: www.pcweek.com DECEMBER 16, 1996 PAGE 17 SECURITY Major backers Java rivals digging in set for digital INTERNET Despite pledges, JavaSoft and Microsoft disagree on key issues Global Access BY MICHAEL MOELLER pects Microsoft to comply with the “[Microsoft is] not going to be Worldwide corporate intranets certificates NEW YORK—JavaSoft has drawn licensing terms. “They have said delivering stand-alone VMs. They require much ISP juggling. BY MICHAEL MOELLER a line in the Internet sand, and Mi- they intend to live up to the letter are not going to deliver VMs to PAGE 67 VeriSign Inc. has secured the back- crosoft Corp. is ready to cross it. and spirit of the agreement,” he ISVs for them to integrate in their ing of a broad cross-section of com- Microsoft’s Java Software De- said. “I don’t have a reason to be- applications,” he said. Playing It Safe panies that are poised to push dig- velopment Kit violates the licens- lieve otherwise at this point in time.” Microsoft, however, has no Compaq’s first router builds ital certificate technology into the ing agreement it plans to remove the SDK from its [Microsoft’s Java SDK] on foundation of established mainstream next year. signed for the Java lan- “ Web site, said Bob Muglia, the Red- hardware and software.
    [Show full text]
  • Wordperfect on Linux FAQ
    WordPerfect on Linux FAQ Rick Moen <[email protected]> Copyright © 2002−2004 Rick Moen 1.4.19, 2004−10−08 Abstract WordPerfect for Linux continues to be popular, and is still conditionally available. This FAQ covers its place in the modern Linux world, and answers common questions. This information is free; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation, version 2. This work is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. Alternatively and at the recipient's option, this work may be used freely under the Attribution−ShareAlike 1.0 licence. WordPerfect on Linux FAQ Table of Contents 1. Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................1 1.1. Nature of the FAQ............................................................................................................................1 1.2. The Big Picture.................................................................................................................................1 1.2.1. What's good about WordPerfect?............................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • The Benefits of an Apathetic Anchor: Why Waterloo Adjusted Faster Than Ottawa
    THE BENEFITS OF AN APATHETIC ANCHOR: WHY WATERLOO ADJUSTED FASTER THAN OTTAWA Darius Ornston and Lorena Camargo INNOVATION POLICY LAB WORKING PAPER SERIES 2021-01 Abstract Why do some communities bounce back from anchor firm collapse more quickly than others? This paper compares Ottawa and Waterloo, two high-technology ecosystems dominated by large, flagship firms, Nortel and Research in Motion (RIM). The Waterloo region adapted rapidly to RIM’s decline, buoyed by the proliferation of local, high-technology startups. By contrast, Nortel’s failure was deeply disruptive. Although Ottawa’s high-technology ecosystem rebounded, recovery was painful, protracted and, in some ways, incomplete. After eliminating several alternative explanations, we conclude that there is a tradeoff in the way communities embed anchor firms. In Ottawa, Nortel was deeply embedded through market-based and associational channels. These ties maximized knowledge spillovers and entrepreneurial recycling as it grew, but simultaneously increased the region’s vulnerability to disruptive shocks. By contrast, RIM was an apathetic anchor. It donated generously to community causes, but was otherwise less engaged within its local, high-technology ecosystem. This distance limited positive spillovers as RIM expanded in the aughts. By creating space for independent enterprises and entrepreneurial programming, however, its apathy enabled the region to capitalize on the opportunities presented by the firm’s decline. Acknowledgments The authors wish to acknowledge generous financial support from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada through the Partnership Grant Program #895-2013- 1008, “Creating Digital Opportunities.” The paper benefited from the feedback of multiple participants in the Creating Digital Opportunities project and the Munk School’s Innovation Policy Lab.
    [Show full text]
  • Formed in 1935 Through the Merger of William Fox's Fox Film, And
    y 20th Century Fox ± Film studio; formed in 1935 through the merger of William Fox's Fox Film, and Twentieth Century Pictures.[1] y 23andme ± Using the 23 pairs of chromosomes that make up each person's genome, the company helps individuals make sense of their own genome.[2] y 27b/6 ± The apartment where George Orwell wrote the novel [3] Nineteen Eighty Four was number 27B on level 6. y 37signals ± Web development company; named for the 37 radiotelescope signals identified by astronomer Paul Horowitz as potential messages from extraterrestrial intelligence.[4] y 3Com ± Network technology producer; the three coms are [5] computer, communication, and compatibility. y 3M ± from the company's original name, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company.[6] y 7-Eleven ± Convenience stores; renamed from "U-Tote'm" in 1946 to reflect their newly extended hours, 7:00 a.m. until 11:00 p.m.[7] [] A y A&M Records ± named after founders Herb Alpert and Jerry Moss[8] y A&P ± from Atlantic & Pacific in Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, a U.S.-based supermarket chain. y A&W Root Beer ± named after founders Roy Allen and Frank Wright[9] y ABN AMRO ± in the 1960s, the Nederlandsche Handel- Maatschappij (Dutch Trading Society; 1824) and De Twentsche Bank merged to form the Algemene Bank Nederland (ABN; General Bank of the Netherlands); in 1966, the Amsterdamsche Bank and the Rotterdamsche Bank merged to form the Amro Bank; in 1991, ABN and Amro Bank merged to form ABN AMRO. y Accenture ± from "Accent on the future".
    [Show full text]