<<

This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of . http://dolearchives.ku.edu

House budget plans. Within of his election, he and other leaders warned' Reagan that Con­ would quickly tbrpedo any move domestic proginms while leav- deferiSe-spending boosts .intact. lli

U.S. NEWS 8t WORLD REPORT, Dec. 10, 1984 - - - - 29__ _ l_

USA TODAY· WEDNESDAY. DECEMBER 12. 1984 • 11A

sic beneftts. Nobody wants to the business to make money; That's a tougll·,thing,to do, to get toucll- those. The Qt~estlon Is he doesn't have any desire. to people wtio c;!!JISI~ r lllem­ whether we sllould freeze the belp the RepubUCl\il Party. But selves Dem~ts to take a cost or living adjustment that I don't have any qliari'el with look at the Republican Party. gives beneftclarles an automat­ him. I think he has the right to We are gewngstronger.l'm go­ Ic Increase, based on Inflation. attack me It he wants. I'm a Ing to do what I can as the lead­ We sllould take a look at that If public llgure, lair g&me. But er or the .Republican Senate to we are going to freeze food I'm willing to bet I'm as conser­ attraC( bi!IC~ Hispanics, and stamp beneftts or other pro­ val,lve as he Is - I just don't union people, plus the people grams 11\111 give very small wear it on my sleeve. we have now. Robert Dole, 6 I, a cllecks to low Income people, USA TODAY: But black Kansas Republican, has' then II seems to me we ouglltto USA TODAY: Do you ex· been elected Senate ma­ leadenblp II solldly antl·Re­ look at ml.ddle and upper In­ pect to bave good relations publlcan. jority leader for the 99th come Social Security benellcla­ with the ? Congress. Dole, who was rles. The president Is not going DOLE: Black leadership lias fonnerly chainnan of the to suggest It, but 11 enough DOLE: They're good now - Senate Finance Commit· to take a look at the Republi­ Democrats and Republicans and, In my view, they'll remain can Party. They can't be anti­ tee, was President Gerald felt It was a good Idea, then we good. Ford's running mate in B•quun Ha~an. USA TOOAV Republican and expect Repub­ could go to the .pi-esldent and licans to jump tbrougll hoops In 1976 and is often men­ try to persuade him to support USA TODAY: You don't see tioned as a possible presi­ fairly. lf\you have two people the Congi-ess. It just doesn't It - or at least sign It up with good subslltutes. Other­ earning lhe same amount or any friction on the horizon? work that way. dential candidate in 1988. ~.wecan'tgeitbesavl~ He was interviewed by money,llvlng In the same town . USA TODAY: To anack the we don't have any Impact on or even the same neighbor­ DOLE: I don't believe so. But USA TODAY: Your wife USA TODAY's Barbara dellclt, the Wblte House Is tbe dellclt or on lnlerest rates I expect tbe president will want Reynolds hood, and one pays a lot of tax­ Elizabeth Is secretary of conslderinl ellinlnatlnl en- or on the strength of the dollar es and the other pays zero or a us to convey honest dlll'erences traii!)IOrtatlon. Do you think 11~ proua1111, Uke the Small - or on the whole ball of wax. very small amount ·- that Is or oplnlon, to him. You don't that there are going to be two BUsiness Administration. Do hard to justify. 'lbat Shouldn't need a ye$ man Ill the House or Doles on the presidential tick­ you support these drastic USA TODAY: fllil't ellml· happen In America It's tbe In !b~ Sena~; What you need Is et Ill 1988? No fed~ral spe~ding cuts? natllll the Small Business Ad­ same with corporations. A iot someone wbo Is suppOrtive but ministration. 1accinslstent or corporations make a lot or !s still lndeileft!le.nf ei!Ougll to DOLE: Who'd be the other DOLE: Let's race It -It's not · wltb RepubUcan_pbllosopby? Income that they pay very little speak up pgvately,-, not mak­ one (!llughs). I mean It would should scrllt:Qty easy. I mean we've all been out tax on, or It Isn't taxed at all. Ing headlines. but· sPeaking up. be Elizabeth and who else? escape speeches, DOLE: A lot or· areas ln .the Sometimes what rilay apjlear there making Repub­ Yet 90me other corporation· (laughs) USA TODAY: What are USA TODAY: Are you p licans and Democrats. We so-called Small Business Ad­ may have a very' blgb ell'ectlve 0 your primary goals as the lllg to support cuts In the de­ have lleBfll the applause !rom ministration ougbt to be re-· tax rate. I_WOI!Iclll't sugest that ~~ n~ S::::~a~d~ ~&~~ ~ USA TODAY: You're not Senate majority leader? fense budget? the audlenCI!.saying, "Right on! view~. Thel)l lsn'l any pro­ the TreaSury plan ougllt to be Hill. Then I'll say, we11 llave ready to announce that you're We're, gollig to ·cut spending. gram In Ibis toV(n that ~ by the taxpaye~S with trouble passing this, Mr. Presi­ going to run for prealdeot? DOLE: I'm trying to sort DOLE: My view Is that the Get baC\( out there !Uld·cut that sboU!clll't be re~ewecL The wild applause, but Ill my view dent It will be areallstlc work­ th05e out We want to take a Pres!dent Is going to be very re­ budget" Some of those people . only thl~ w~ Sl!oulclll't review we are_IIIJing'to have an educa­ Ing relationShip. DOLE: No. We've had a lot look at the Senate rules. I want allstlc on defense. .It Is not go­ who were applauding probBbly Is the lliten;st· on. th!! debt tloqal ell'ort before we can sal­ of fun kidding about that In to sit down with the Democrat­ Ing to escape the ax. thought yciu ~ere going 10 cut We've 11111 to P.8Y tha.L We mlgbt vage ·a radical tax plan that USA TODAY: What do the fact, I miN say I got more mall Ic leader and go.over some of or ellmlna!e somebody else's even Gild ·a better way to do may be good. RepubiiCUII have to do to wllen I was named Senate ma­ their priorities. You can't make USA TODAY: It bas -been program-not theirs. ',ye can't that with a lltue work around condnue to be a lltrolll party? jority leader than even when I this Senate work unless you've SUUested that $8 bUUon c:ould get· there unless we. do some­ here. USA TODAY: ,.Richard , VI­ was on the presidential ticket got cooperation from both be cut from this year's de­ thing. It's tough, tougb to get ~e, the (lllblllber of DOLE: We've 1101 to keep at­ with . A lot of peo­ USA TODAY: People seem CoD­ sides or the aisle. Obviously the fense budgeL Do you agree? there unless you take actions ~•tlve that tracilng more people Into our ple wrote, "We hope that It's go­ to be wqrrled tha~ tu slmpll­ D/6at.l!il11.81!1 big, big challenges we have In · like th05e belrig considered you bave1. IIIJipor(ed party, people that blstoriCaiiy Ing to be a Dole-Dole ticket" 1985 are the budget delldl and DOLE: I don't think that Sec­ now by tbe White House. · fl~tlon means they'll lose tubeca• lllereaer, you are ·the Ill the. past 40, 50 years have I'm not certain II makes any tax simpllllcation. retary Weinberger would 10me deductlona. of the Repub­ been looking the other way. political sense. agree that It could eve~~