DOCSLIB.ORG

S. Maunakea Invasive Species Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
S. Maunakea Invasive Species Management Plan The Hawai`i-Pacific Islands Cooperative Ecosystems Studies Unit & Pacific Cooperative Studies Unit UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI`I AT MĀNOA Dr. David C. Duffy, Unit Leader Department of Botany 3190 Maile Way, St. John #408 Honolulu, Hawai’i 96822 Technical Report 191 Maunakea Invasive Species Management Plan February 2015 Casper Vanderwoude1, Frederick Klasner2, Jessica Kirkpatrick2, Springer Kaye3 1 Hawai‘i Ant Lab, Pacific Cooperative Studies Unit, University of Hawai’i, 16 E. Lanikaula St. Hilo, HI 96720. Email: [email protected] 2Office of Mauna Kea Management 640 N. A‘ohōkū Place. Hilo, HI 96720 3 Big Island Invasive Species Committee 23 E. Kawili St. Hilo, HI 96720 PCSU is a cooperative program between the University of Hawai`i and U.S. National Park Service, Cooperative Ecological Studies Unit. Organization Contact Information: Casper Vanderwoude, [email protected] Recommended Citation: Vanderwoude, C., F. Klasner, J. Kirkpatrick and S. Kaye. 2015. Maunakea Invasive Species Management Plan. Technical Report No. 191. Pacific Cooperative Studies Unit, University of Hawai‘i, Honolulu, Hawai‘i. 84 pp. Key words: Invasive species, IAS, management plan, weeds, prevention, response, monitoring Place key words: Hawaii, Mauna Kea, Maunakea Science Reserve, Halepōhaku, astronomy precinct, Office of Maunakea Management Editor: David C. Duffy, PCSU Unit Leader (Email: [email protected]) Series Editor: Clifford W. Morden, PCSU Deputy Director (Email: [email protected]) About this technical report series: This technical report series began in 1973 with the formation of the Cooperative National Park Resources Studies Unit at the University of Hawai'i at Mānoa. In 2000, it continued under the Pacific Cooperative Studies Unit (PCSU). The Pacific Cooperative Studies Unit at the University of Hawai'i at Mānoa works to protect cultural and natural biodiversity in the Pacific while encouraging a sustainable economy. PCSU works cooperatively with private, state and federal land management organizations, allowing them to pool and coordinate their efforts to address problems across the landscape. TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1. Introduction and Background ....................................................................................................................... 4 Foreword ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Background ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Organization ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Geography of the Management Area ................................................................................................................................................. 6 Halepōhaku ...................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Road Corridor .................................................................................................................................................................. 8 Astronomy Precinct ...................................................................................................................................................... 8 Mauna Kea Science Reserve ...................................................................................................................................... 8 Natural Area Reserve (NAR) ..................................................................................................................................... 9 Policies for Management of Invasive Species on Maunakea ................................................................................................. 10 Section 2. Prevention .......................................................................................................................................................... 11 Potential Invasive Species: Threats and Impacts ...................................................................................................................... 11 Plants ................................................................................................................................................................................ 11 Vertebrates ..................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Invertebrates ................................................................................................................................................................. 14 Traits of Invasive Ants ............................................................................................................................................... 14 Potential Threat Pathways .................................................................................................................................................................. 18 Vehicles and Vessels ................................................................................................................................................... 19 Goods and Other Commodities .............................................................................................................................. 19 People ............................................................................................................................................................................... 19 Regulated Pathways ............................................................................................................................................................................... 19 Vehicles and Vessels ................................................................................................................................................... 20 Commodities .................................................................................................................................................................. 20 People and Possessions ............................................................................................................................................. 20 Non‐Regulated Pathways ..................................................................................................................................................................... 21 Vehicles and Vessels ................................................................................................................................................... 21 Commodities .................................................................................................................................................................. 21 People and Possessions ............................................................................................................................................. 21 Analysis of Threat Pathways and Proposed Management Options ................................................................................... 21 Recommended Prevention Strategy ................................................................................................................................................ 25 Section 3. Monitoring for New and Established Invasive Species .................................................................... 29 General Principles .................................................................................................................................................................................... 29 Analysis of Risk: Management Zones .............................................................................................................................................. 29 Halepōhaku .................................................................................................................................................................... 29 Roadway Corridor ....................................................................................................................................................... 30 Astronomy Precinct .................................................................................................................................................... 30 Mauna Kea Science Reserve .................................................................................................................................... 31 Analysis of Risk: Potential Threat Species .................................................................................................................................... 33 Plants ................................................................................................................................................................................ 33 Vertebrates ..................................................................................................................................................................... 39 Arthropods ..................................................................................................................................................................... 41 Section 4. Control of Established
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Anisodactylus Binotatus Fabr., a Carabid Beetle New to New Zealand, and a Review of the Exotic Carabid Fauna
    Pacific Insects 5 (4) : 837-847 December 30, 1963 ANISODACTYLUS BINOTATUS FABR., A CARABID BEETLE NEW TO NEW ZEALAND, AND A REVIEW OF THE EXOTIC CARABID FAUNA By R. L. C. Pilgrim DEPT, OF ZOOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY, NEW ZEALAND Abstract: Anisodactylus binotatus Fabr. 1787 (Col.: Carabidae), an introduced species now established in Canterbury (South Island), New Zealand, is reported for the first time. The literature respecting other carabids sometimes recorded as introduced is reviewed; Ago- nochila binotata (White, 1846), Agonum submetallicum (White, 1846), Hypharpax australasiae (Dejean, 1829) and Pentagonica vittipennis Chaudoir, 1877 are shown to be better considered as endemic to the Australia - New Zealand area. Other species are classed as either native to New Zealand, clearly introduced though not all established, or of doubtful occurrence in New Zealand. Introduction: The Carabidae of New Zealand are predominantly endemic species, but a small number of exotic species has been recorded. This paper reports a further introduc­ tion to the carabid fauna of this country and concludes with a survey of recorded exotic Carabidae in New Zealand. Specimens of the newly-recorded species were collected in domestic gardens in Christ­ church, and were included in a collection sent for identification to Dr. E. B. Britton, British Museum (Nat. Hist.), who kindly drew the writer's attention to the fact that they were so far unreported from New Zealand. Description of adult (from New Zealand specimens) Fig. 1. Anisodactylus binotatus Fabricius, 1787 Color: Head, pronotum, elytra and femora black; tibiae and tarsi light brown to red- black ; palps and antennal segments 1-2 brown, remainder of antennae black; leg spines red-brown; head with small red spot on frons between eyes.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Detection of Theileria and Babesia in a Diversity of Stomoxyini
    Original Article Molecular Detection of Theileria and Babesia in a Diversity of Stomoxyini Flies (Diptera: Muscidae) from Khao Yai National Park, Thailand Tanasak Changbunjong1,2* Sivapong Sungpradit1 Oraphan Kanthasaewee2 Poonyapat Sedwisai2 Siriporn Tangsudjai2 Jiraporn Ruangsittichai3 Abstract Blood protozoan species of the genera Theileria and Babesia are known to infect both domestic and wild animals. This study was carried out to detect Theileria and Babesia DNA in Stomoxyini flies collected in Khao Yai National Park, Thailand. A total of 110 Stomoxyini flies including 6 species, Stomoxys calcitrans, Stomoxys indicus, Stomoxys pullus, Stomoxys uruma, Haematobosca sanguinolenta and Haematostoma austeni, were examined by amplification against the 18S rRNA gene of the Theileria/Babesia species and then the PCR products were sequenced for species identification by comparison with published sequences from the GenBank database. Ten (9.1%) out of 110 samples were positive against the 18S rRNA gene of the Theileria/Babesia species. For sequence analysis, 7 samples (6.4%) were identified as Theileria sp. and showed high identity (99%) with Theileria sp. (JQ751279) and T. cervi (HQ184406 and HQ184411), while 3 samples (2.7%) were identified as Babesia canis vogeli and showed 100% identity with reported sequences of B. canis vogeli (AB083374 and HM590440). Phylogenetic relationships among the sequenced samples showed that the Theileria sp. appeared in the same group as T. cervi, while B. canis vogeli appeared in a distinct group. This study
    [Show full text]
  • User's Guide Project: the Impact of Non-Native Predators On
    User’s Guide Project: The Impact of Non-Native Predators on Pollinators and Native Plant Reproduction in a Hawaiian Dryland Ecosystem SERDP project number: RC-2432 Principal Investigators: Christina T. Liang, USDA Forest Service Clare E. Aslan, Northern Arizona University William P. Haines, University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa Aaron B. Shiels, USDA APHIS Contributor: Manette E. Sandor, Northern Arizona University Date: 30 October 2019 Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202- 4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY) 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED (From - To) 10-30-2019 User’s Guide 01-02-2014 to 10-30-2019 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER User’s Guide. The Impact of Non-Native Predators on Pollinators and Native Plant Reproduction in a Hawaiian Dryland Ecosystem.
    [Show full text]
  • Local and Regional Influences on Arthropod Community
    LOCAL AND REGIONAL INFLUENCES ON ARTHROPOD COMMUNITY STRUCTURE AND SPECIES COMPOSITION ON METROSIDEROS POLYMORPHA IN THE HAWAIIAN ISLANDS A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI'I IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN ZOOLOGY (ECOLOGY, EVOLUTION AND CONSERVATION BIOLOGy) AUGUST 2004 By Daniel S. Gruner Dissertation Committee: Andrew D. Taylor, Chairperson John J. Ewel David Foote Leonard H. Freed Robert A. Kinzie Daniel Blaine © Copyright 2004 by Daniel Stephen Gruner All Rights Reserved. 111 DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to all the Hawaiian arthropods who gave their lives for the advancement ofscience and conservation. IV ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Fellowship support was provided through the Science to Achieve Results program of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and training grants from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation and the National Science Foundation (DGE-9355055 & DUE-9979656) to the Ecology, Evolution and Conservation Biology (EECB) Program of the University of Hawai'i at Manoa. I was also supported by research assistantships through the U.S. Department of Agriculture (A.D. Taylor) and the Water Resources Research Center (RA. Kay). I am grateful for scholarships from the Watson T. Yoshimoto Foundation and the ARCS Foundation, and research grants from the EECB Program, Sigma Xi, the Hawai'i Audubon Society, the David and Lucille Packard Foundation (through the Secretariat for Conservation Biology), and the NSF Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant program (DEB-0073055). The Environmental Leadership Program provided important training, funds, and community, and I am fortunate to be involved with this network.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Activity of Bloodsucking Flies (Diptera: Muscidae)
    Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2019; 7(2): 738-741 E-ISSN: 2320-7078 P-ISSN: 2349-6800 Diversity and activity of bloodsucking flies JEZS 2019; 7(2): 738-741 © 2019 JEZS (Diptera: Muscidae) in Cibungbulang dairy farm, Received: 09-01-2019 Accepted: 13-02-2019 Bogor regency Indonesia Susi Soviana Entomology Laboratory, Division of Parasitology and Susi Soviana, Upik Kesumawati Hadi and Agus Kurniawan Putra Medical Entomology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Bogor Abstract Agricultural University, Flies cause problem and be important vectors of several diseases of medical and veterinary. There are Indonesia non and bloodsucking flies in livestock. The existence of flies on a dairy farm cause decrease of cows Upik Kesumawati Hadi productivity, body weight and as pathogens transmitter. The purpose of this study was to determine of Entomology Laboratory, haematophagus flies diversity and the degree of its infestation, also flies daily activites on cows. The Division of Parasitology and study was conducted in 27 dairy farms at Cibungbulang area, which divided into three categories namely Medical Entomology, Faculty of Low Density Farms (1-10 cattles/cowshed), Medium Density Farms (11-20 cattles/cowshed) and High Veterinary Medicine, Bogor Density Farms (more than 20 cattles/cowshed). In all farms, flies collected by sweeping net on five cattle Agricultural University, bodies inside the cowshed. It took 3-5 minutes to get flies for every cattle with the net. There were 5 Indonesia species muscidae haematophagus flies, i.e. Stomoxys calcitrans (19, 15%), Haematobia exigua (5,40%), S. indicus (3.20%), S. bengalensis (0.32%) and S. sitiens ( 0,02%) from total 26 flies species caught in Agus Kurniawan Putra the farm.
    [Show full text]
  • Arthropod Diversity Estimates for Three Native Subalpine Plant
    ARTHROPOD DIVERSITY ESTIMATES FOR THREE NATIVE SUBALPINE PLANT SPECIES ON THE MAUNAKEA VOLCANO OF HAWAI‘I ISLAND A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I AT HILO IN PARTIAL FULFULLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN TROPICAL CONSERVATION BIOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE DECEMBER 2016 By Heather Stever Thesis Committee: Jesse Eiben, Chairperson Ryan Perroy Paul Selmants Keywords: Arthropods, Endemic, Hawai‘i, Insects, Maunakea, Subalpine Acknowledgements I am immensely grateful for the knowledge, advice, support, and funding that I received from the many people and organizations that helped to make this project possible. I would like to especially thank my academic advisor, Jesse Eiben, the University of Hawai‘i at Hilo Office of Maunakea Management, and the Tropical Conservation Biology and Environmental Science faculty and students. I would also like to thank, in alphabetical order, Nina Buchanan, Jessica Kirkpatrick, Frederick Klasner, Devin Leopold, Stephanie Nagata, Julien Pétillon, Ryan Perroy, Daniel Rubinoff, Esther Sebastián-González, Paul Selmants, Marleena Sheffield, Michael Shintaku, Andrew Stever, Amber Stillman, and Darcy Yogi. ii Abstract Terrestrial arthropods are among the most abundant and diverse animals on Earth, especially in Hawai‘i where they constitute the vast majority of endemic fauna and play crucial roles in nearly every habitat throughout the islands. Arthropod surveys and inventories are useful methods for documenting arthropod diversity, but studying arthropods can be extremely difficult. Arthropod collection is often taxing because many species are very mobile and exist in harsh climates or on terrain that is difficult to access. Arthropod identification can also be challenging since many arthropods are remarkably small with complex morphologies and diverse life histories.
    [Show full text]
  • (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) De La Región Neotropical
    Biota Colombiana 4 (2) 123 - 145, 2003 Lista de los géneros y especies de la familia Chalcididae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) de la región Neotropical Diana C. Arias1 y Gerard Delvare2 1 Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos “Alexander von Humboldt”, AA 8693, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia. [email protected], [email protected] 2 Departamento de Faunística y Taxonomía del CIRAD, Montpellier, Francia. [email protected] Palabras Clave: Insecta, Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea, Chalcididae, Parasitoide, Avispas Patonas, Neotrópico El orden Hymenoptera se ha dividido tradicional- La superfamilia Chalcidoidea se caracteriza por presentar mente en dos subórdenes “Symphyta” y Apocrita, este úl- en el ala anterior una venación reducida, tan solo están timo a su vez dividido en dos grupos con categoría de sec- presentes la vena submarginal, la vena marginal, la vena ción o infraorden dependiendo de los autores, denomina- estigmal y la vena postmarginal. Adicionalmente el pronoto dos “Parasitica” o también conocidos como Terebrantes y no se extiende hasta la tégula debido a que el prepecto Aculeata (Gauld & Bolton 1988). Gauld & Hanson (1995) (esclerito, en forma de sillín o herradura) se extiende hasta abandonan esta clasificación reconociendo únicamente la tégula y separa el mesopleurón del pronoto. Otra caracte- superfamilias dentro del orden. Sin embargo muchos auto- rística de este superfamilia es la presencia de un espiráculo res siguen utilizando la división tradicional porque consi- mesotorácico visible, además algunos especimenes presen- deran que es un medio práctico para separar grandes gru- tan estructuras sensoriales en uno o más de los pos de Hymenoptera en el aspecto biológico. flagelómeros. Finalmente algunas familias exhiben coloraciones metálicas (Gibson 1993).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 La Carabidofauna Edáfica De Los Ambientes Litorales
    VI Encuentro Nacional Científico Técnico de Biología del Suelo y IV Encuentro sobre Fijación Biológica del Nitrógeno, Libro de Resúmenes (ISBN 978-950-665- 438-2), A4 002: 1-19, 2007. LA CARABIDOFAUNA EDÁFICA DE LOS AMBIENTES LITORALES MARÍTIMOS, DUNALES Y RETRODUNALES DEL PARTIDO DE GENERAL PUEYRREDÓN, PROVINCIA DE BUENOS AIRES. SU IMPORTANCIA COMO HERRAMIENTA DE MANEJO DE ESTOS ESPACIOS Cicchino, Armando Conrado Laboratorio de Artrópodos, Departamento de Biología, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Funes 3250, 7600 Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina. E-mail [email protected] . RESUMEN Se estudia la riqueza específica de la franja costera -42 Km.- del partido (500 m desde la línea de marea hacia el interior), caracterizando las especies más típicas o abundantes por sus afinidades con particulares condiciones del o los hábitats que frecuentan y su relación con las actividades antrópicas locales. Especial atención se ha prestado a las estrategias de repoblamiento de ambientes inestables litorales y citadinos. Se capturaron 93 especies en 19 tribus y 45 géneros, y más del 95% de estas especies también se hallan en el casco urbano y suburbano de la ciudad de Mar del Plata y otros centros poblados. Dieciséis especies son xerófilas o subxerófilas, 28 son hidrófilas, 13 son netamente riparias, una introducida y casi cosmopolita es sinantrópica y exclusivamente citadina, 3 son acuáticas, y 5 son eurítopas, ubicuistas y sinantrópicas. Faunísticamente, el ensamble de referencia representa el 57,40% de la riqueza específica de los partidos costeros del sudeste bonaerense (162 especies relevadas al 20-V-2007), y el 26,42% de la riqueza de la provincia de Buenos Aires (352 sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Spider Community Composition and Structure in a Shrub-Steppe Ecosystem: the Effects of Prey Availability and Shrub Architecture
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 5-2012 Spider Community Composition and Structure In A Shrub-Steppe Ecosystem: The Effects of Prey Availability and Shrub Architecture Lori R. Spears Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Spears, Lori R., "Spider Community Composition and Structure In A Shrub-Steppe Ecosystem: The Effects of Prey Availability and Shrub Architecture" (2012). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 1207. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/1207 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SPIDER COMMUNITY COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE IN A SHRUB-STEPPE ECOSYSTEM: THE EFFECTS OF PREY AVAILABILITY AND SHRUB ARCHITECTURE by Lori R. Spears A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Ecology Approved: ___________________________ ___________________________ James A. MacMahon Edward W. Evans Major Professor Committee Member ___________________________ ___________________________ S.K. Morgan Ernest Ethan P. White Committee Member Committee Member ___________________________ ___________________________ Eugene W. Schupp Mark R. McLellan Committee Member Vice President for Research and Dean of the School of Graduate Studies UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 2012 ii Copyright © Lori R. Spears 2012 All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Spider Community Composition and Structure in a Shrub-Steppe Ecosystem: The Effects of Prey Availability and Shrub Architecture by Lori R.
    [Show full text]
  • Palila Restoration Research, 1996−2012 Summary and Management Implications
    Technical Report HCSU-046A PALILA RESTOratION RESEarch, 1996−2012 SUMMARY AND MANAGEMENT IMPLIcatIONS Paul C. Banko1 and Chris Farmer2, Editors 1 U.S. Geological Survey, Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center, Kīlauea Field Station, P.O. Box 44, Hawaii National Park, HI 96718 2 American Bird Conservancy, Kīlauea Field Station, P.O. Box 44, Hawaii National Park, HI 96718 Hawai‘i Cooperative Studies Unit University of Hawai‘i at Hilo 200 W. Kawili St. Hilo, HI 96720 (808) 933-0706 October 2014 Citation: Banko, P. C., and C. Farmer, editors. 2014. Palila restoration research, 1996–2012: summary and management implications. Hawai‘i Cooperative Studies Unit Technical Report HCSU-046A. University of Hawai‘i at Hilo. 70 pages. This product was prepared under Cooperative Agreements CA03WRAG0036-3036WS0012, CA03WRAG0036-3036WS0032, and CAG09AC00041 for the Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center of the U.S. Geological Survey. This article has been peer reviewed and approved for publication consistent with USGS Fundamental Science Practices (http://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/1367/). Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. PALILA RESTORATION RESEARCH, 1996–2012: SUMMARY AND MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS A palila (Loxioides bailleui) selects a seedpod from a māmane (Sophora chrysophylla) tree high on the western slope of Mauna Kea, Hawai‘i. The palila’s ecology and existence are inextricably linked to green māmane seeds, their critically important food. Chronic shortfalls in the supply of māmane seedpods could lead to the extinction of the palila. Photo by Jack Jeffrey (http://www.jackjeffreyphoto.com/).
    [Show full text]
  • Kirstern Lica Follmann Haseyama Filogenia E Tempos De Divergência De Muscidae
    Kirstern Lica Follmann Haseyama Filogenia e tempos de divergência de Muscidae (Diptera, Calyptratae, Schizophora) Tese de Doutorado apresentada à Coordenação do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Biológicas (Área de concentração em Entomologia) da Universidade Federal do Paraná como requisito parcial para a obtenção do título de mestre em Ciências Biológicas. Orientador: Claudio José Barros de Carvalho Co-orientadores: Eduardo Andrade Botelho de Almeida (USP) Brian Michael Wiegmann (NCSU) Curitiba, março de 2014 ii Agradecimentos Agradeço às instituições que apoiaram este trabalho: Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnológico pela bolsa de doutorado; ao Conselho de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior pela bolsa no período inicial do doutorado, pela oportunidade de visitar o Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia pelo Programa Nacional de Cooperação Acadêmica, e durante a minha estadia no exterior, pelo programa de Doutorado Sanduíche; à Universidade Federal do Paraná, o Departamento de Zoologia e o Programa de Pós-graduação em Entomologia por oferecer as condições necessárias para o período do doutorado realizado em território nacional; à North Carolina State University e o seu Departamento de Entomologia por possibilitar a execução de parte do trabalho durante os 11 meses nela passados. Ao meu orientador, Claudio José Barros de Carvalho, pela orientação sobre moscas, o mundo acadêmico, a minha carreira e tantas outras coisas, desde a graduação até agora. Foram incontáveis horas, todas elas muito bem gastas, passadas na frente da lupa conferindo todos os espécimes identificados, no computador, nos livros ou conversando. Ao meu co- orientador, Eduardo Andrade Botelho de Almeida, por sempre estar a postos, mesmo à distância, para tirar toda a sorte de dúvidas a respeito de biogeografia e filogenética, também desde a graduação.
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera – Brachycera
    Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e4187 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.3.e4187 Data Paper Fauna Europaea: Diptera – Brachycera Thomas Pape‡§, Paul Beuk , Adrian Charles Pont|, Anatole I. Shatalkin¶, Andrey L. Ozerov¶, Andrzej J. Woźnica#, Bernhard Merz¤, Cezary Bystrowski«», Chris Raper , Christer Bergström˄, Christian Kehlmaier˅, David K. Clements¦, David Greathead†,ˀ, Elena Petrovna Kamenevaˁ, Emilia Nartshuk₵, Frederik T. Petersenℓ, Gisela Weber ₰, Gerhard Bächli₱, Fritz Geller-Grimm₳, Guy Van de Weyer₴, Hans-Peter Tschorsnig₣, Herman de Jong₮, Jan-Willem van Zuijlen₦, Jaromír Vaňhara₭, Jindřich Roháček₲, Joachim Ziegler‽, József Majer ₩, Karel Hůrka†,₸, Kevin Holston ‡‡, Knut Rognes§§, Lita Greve-Jensen||, Lorenzo Munari¶¶, Marc de Meyer##, Marc Pollet ¤¤, Martin C. D. Speight««, Martin John Ebejer»», Michel Martinez˄˄, Miguel Carles-Tolrá˅˅, Mihály Földvári¦¦, Milan Chvála ₸, Miroslav Bartákˀˀ, Neal L. Evenhuisˁˁ, Peter J. Chandler₵₵, Pierfilippo Cerrettiℓℓ, Rudolf Meier ₰₰, Rudolf Rozkosny₭, Sabine Prescher₰, Stephen D. Gaimari₱₱, Tadeusz Zatwarnicki₳₳, Theo Zeegers₴₴, Torsten Dikow₣₣, Valery A. Korneyevˁ, Vera Andreevna Richter†,₵, Verner Michelsen‡, Vitali N. Tanasijtshuk₵, Wayne N. Mathis₣₣, Zdravko Hubenov₮₮, Yde de Jong ₦₦,₭₭ ‡ Natural History Museum of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark § Natural History Museum Maastricht / Diptera.info, Maastricht, Netherlands | Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Oxford, United Kingdom ¶ Zoological Museum, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia # Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wrocław,
    [Show full text]