DOCSLIB.ORG

Sheet 1 of 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sheet 1 of 2 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MISCELLANEOUS FIELD STUDIES MF–2344 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Sheet 1 of 2 116°00´ 45´ 30´ 15´ 115°00´ 34°30´ A 45 34°30´ Qoa 40 Qoa INTRODUCTION steep west stratal dips of early Miocene rocks in the western Calumet Mountains and is suggested also John, B.E., 1981, Reconnaissance study of Mesozoic plutonic rocks in the Mojave Desert region, in L Qpsh ts Ks Tdvc u Qps YXg 75 Qya d Amboy Crater lava flow Kl 35 by the moderate NNE dip of the early Miocene East Bullion dike swarm in the eastern Bullion Moun- Howard, K.A., Carr, M.D., and Miller, D.M., eds., Tectonic framework of the Mojave and Sonoran 25 l 35 80 Ko Geologic map units are described briefly on this map, with the expectation that readers seeking L Td o 14 Xf Ks u w Painted Rock tains. Cross section A–A' interprets extensional structural style between these localities. Gently east- Deserts, California and Arizona: U.S. Geological Survey Open-file Report 81–503, p. 48–50. Jbv? Tab Qpsg Qya 30 detailed descriptions (including contact relations and modal mineral proportions for plutonic units) can d F Qba l a Qpb 153m Pluton dipping extensional faults are exposed in the eastern Sheep Hole and Pinto Mountains and imaged seis- Karish, C.R., Miller, E.L., and Sutter, J.F., 1987, Mesozoic tectonic and magmatic history of the central o Jbv? 80 u 10 Dၤm Ko 70 consult the source geologic maps listed on the index map (fig. 1). Summary modal diagrams are shown w Jbv? l t 45 PMb Ks mically below Ward Valley (Frost and Okaya, 1986). In cross section A–A', I infer a style of concealed Mojave Desert, in Dickinson, W.R. and Klute, M.A., eds., Mesozoic rocks of southern Arizona and F Qoa e 20 Qya here in Figure 2. Geophysical maps and interpretations are available in Simpson and others (1984), Tblc a Jbv? Tdi a u s 25 70 half grabens under the valleys to be consistent with unmigrated industry seismic reflection profiles adjacent areas: Arizona Geological Society Digest, v. 18, p. 15–32. t 12 30 25 Mariano and others (1986), Frost and Okaya (1986), Mariano and Grauch (1988), and Jachens and l Tdv 16 t b 45 60 (D.A. Okaya, unpub. data). Kupfer, D.H., and Bassett, A.M., 1962, Geologic reconnaissance map of part of the southeastern r Ship Mountains 20 ၤt 20 30 Howard (1992). Neumann and Leszcykowski (1993) summarized information on mines and mineral w Td Qya Ko Tc a 307m 20 45 45 a 65 e 35 n Qps 537m Qya Pluton Ks deposits. Discussions and interpretations of the geology are available from the source geologic maps In late Neogene and Quaternary time, strike-slip faults that are part of the eastern California shear Mojave Desert, California: U.S. Geological Survey Mineral Investigations Field Studies Map Tbl s Qoa c Qoa Xf Dၤm 10 50 20 50 t h 5 Kl 40 zone displaced rocks in western parts of the quadrangle (Howard and Miller, 1992; Richard, 1993). MF–205, scale 1:125,000. b 20 80 55 25 and elsewhere, and are briefly summarized here. The map was prepared in 1994. r 15 30 35 65 30 YXg 50 East-striking faults (in the Pinto Mountains) are sinistral, and NW-striking faults are dextral (Dibblee, Lucchitta, Ivo, 1979, Late Cenozoic uplift of the Colorado Plateau and adjacent Colorado River region: a Tdi Qoa 15 Xk Ko Qo n Jsm 40 20 NAMES Qoa c 70 1961, 1967a; Hope, 1966; Jagiello, 1991). Ranges and basins in the quadrangle may owe their forms Tectonophysics, v. 61, p.63–95. h 13 247m 40 Qya Qpb 0 30 40 The map applies new names to structures including the Ivanhoe fault, eastern Bullion dike swarm, 60 25 15 largely to transpression and transtension between the moving and rotating strike-slip fault blocks Luyendyk, B.P., 1991, A model for Neogene crustal rotations, transtension, and transpression in south- 307m t 45 5 Old Woman Pluton Ko Qblc s 30 Amboy Crater lava flow, Ship Mountains pluton, Cleghorn Pass pluton, Sheep Hole Mountains pluton, (Simpson and others, 1984; Jagiello and others, 1992; Jachens and Howard, 1992; Richard, 1993). ern California: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 103, p. 1528–1536. ru ts 55 th Qya 50 Ko a Xk and Sheep Hole Pass pluton. I apply pluton names to structural bodies and not necessarily to lithodemes Large rotations are expected between the Pinto and Bullion Mountains based on models of bookshelf Mariano, John, and Grauch, V.J.S., 1988, Aeromagnetic maps of the Colorado River region including D m Xk Qya Tdv 8 ၤ 50 Ks ts or map units, even though they may largely coincide. For example, the Old Woman pluton is an intru- Qpsh faulting and regional paleomagnetic studies (Carter and others, 1987; Luyendyk, 1991; Dokka and the Kingman, Needles, Salton Sea, and El Centro 1° x 2° quadrangles, California, Arizona, and Qya 45 10 897m 25 a sive body consisting of the formally named Old Woman Mountains Granodiorite. Map units newly Travis, 1990; Richard, 1993). However, Jurassic dike swarms in these two ranges have unexpectedly Nevada: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Field Studies Map MF–2023, 3 sheets, scale 20 20 Tc Km 35 Xk 40 40 named on this map are the Dale Lake Volcanics; Coxcomb Intrusive Suite and its included Sheep Hole similar strikes, a finding that may accord better with small relative rotation (approximately 20°) pre- 1:250,000. 50 70 Jd Tbst Qoa 60 45 60 Pass Granite, Sheep Hole Mountains Granodiorite, and Clarks Pass Granodiorite; Iron Mountains Intru- dicted by Powell's (1993) palinspastic model. Mariano, John, Helferty, M.G., and Gage, T.B., 1986, Bouguer and isostatic residual gravity maps of 80 89 n 30 50 a Qbl 30 Qoa Qy lo 80 n ၤt sive Suite and its included Granite Pass Granite, Danby Lake Granite Gneiss, and Iron Granodiorite A slickensided surface was encountered in drilling of probable Quaternary deposits under Cadiz the Colorado River region, including the Kingman, Needles, Salton Sea, and El Centro 1° x 2° a 50 60 Qoa 10 c Xk Kop Qy Ycm S 50 Gneiss; Chubbuck Porphyry; Bullion Mountains Intrusive Suite and its included Virginia Dale Quartz Lake (Bassett and others, 1959; Howard and Miller, 1992). The presence of this concealed fault sug- quadrangles: U.S. Geological Survey Open-file Report 86–347, scale 1:250,000, 7 sheets. Qoa Qya Xk Qya Monzonite; and Dog Wash Gneiss. Intrusive suites are proposed on this map in order to group together gests that other Quaternary faults could be concealed by the widespread Holocene deposits in Bristol Metzger, D.G., 1968, The Bouse Formation (Pliocene) of the Parker–Blythe–Cibola area, Arizona and Qy ၦm 75 KJpg 80 85 each of a series of lithodemes that appear to be closely related lithologically, spatially, and temporally. Lake, Cadiz, and Danby Lake valleys. Faults exposed in the east and central parts of the quadrangle last California: Geological Survey Research, 1968, U.S.Geological Survey Professional Paper 600–D, Qoa Jd 85 80 50 Qbl 45 Ycm Ycm 9 Ko 60 Ko The underlying concept of an intrusive suite is that all the units are in some manner cogenetic and that moved in the early Pleistocene, whereas the Valley Mountain faults in the southwest part of the quad- p. 126–136. Qoa Td ts 65 55 6055 101m Dၤm ၤt they are products of a single fusion episode (Bateman, 1992). Qoa rangle cut deposits assigned to the Holocene (Howard and Miller, 1992). This concentration of young- Miller, C.D., 1989, Potential hazards from future volcanic eruptions in California: U.S. Geological Sur- 75 45 30 est fault activity to the southwest accords with a southwestward increase in seismicity (Goter, 1992). vey Bulletin 1847, 17 p. Jbv? 60 45 Xs GEOLOGIC SUMMARY Jbv 70 Ycm Km Miller, C.F., Howard, K.A., and Hoisch, T.D., 1982, Mesozoic thrusting, metamorphism, and pluton- Ko 40 C 80 PMb 60 The Sheep Hole Mountains quadrangle covers an area of the Mojave Desert characterized by ism, Old Woman-Piute Range, southeastern California, in Frost, E.G. and Martin, D.L, eds., Meso- l e Kcg Qya gh Qya Ko basins and ranges (fig. 3). Alluviated valleys and playas (dry lakes) are as low as 165 m elevation at zoic-Cenozoic tectonic evolution of the Colorado River region, California, Arizona, and Nevada Qpsg Jd Ko REFERENCES CITED o Jbv? Qoa 75 Cadiz Lake playa (see map of major topographic features). The mountain ranges they separate are as Jbv r 45 20 Anderson, J.L., 1988, Core complexes of the Mojave-Sonoran Desert: Conditions of plutonism, myloni- (Anderson-Hamilton volume): San Diego, Cordilleran Publishers, p. 1561–581 Jbv n Qps Qwo Qoa 35 50 50 high as 1490 m elevation, for example in the Old Woman Mountains. Rock units are well exposed P 60 Ko ts tization, and decompression, in Ernst, W.G., ed., Metamorphism and crustal evolution of the west- Miller, C.F., Wooden, J.L., Bennett, V.C., Wright, J.E., Solomon, G.C., and Hurst, R.W., 1990, Petro- Qoa a Qwy Kcg 70 Km Km s Ko 55 owing to low rainfall and sparse vegetation. genesis of the composite peraluminous-metaluminous Old Woman-Piute Range batholith, south- s 85 Qwy ern United States (Rubey volume 7): Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice Hall, p. 502–525. Jbpm ts 50 F Qoa 75 80 Ko eastern California; Isotopic constraints, in Anderson, J.L., ed., The nature and origin of Cordilleran a Kccp? 40 Ko Kop PROTEROZOIC ROCKS Bacheller, John, III, 1978, Quaternary geology of the Mojave Desert-Eastern Transverse Ranges boun- u 50 80 Kcg 80 45 35 35 l Kcsh 20 70 70 magmatism: Geological Society of America Memoir 174, p.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Eagle Crest Energy Gen-Tie and Water Pipeline Environmental
    Eagle Crest Energy Gen-Tie and Water Pipeline Environmental Assessment and Proposed California Desert Conservation Area Plan Amendment BLM Case File No. CACA-054096 BLM-DOI-CA-D060-2016-0017-EA BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT California Desert District 22835 Calle San Juan De Los Lagos Moreno Valley, CA 92553 April 2017 USDOI Bureau of Land Management April 2017Page 2 Eagle Crest Energy Gen-Tie and Water Pipeline EA and Proposed CDCA Plan Amendment United States Department of the Interior BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT California Desert District 22835 Calle San Juan De Los Lagos Moreno Valley, CA 92553 April XX, 2017 Dear Reader: The U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has finalized the Environmental Assessment (EA) for the proposed right-of-way (ROW) and associated California Desert Conservation Area Plan (CDCA) Plan Amendment (PA) for the Eagle Crest Energy Gen- Tie and Water Supply Pipeline (Proposed Action), located in eastern Riverside County, California. The Proposed Action is part of a larger project, the Eagle Mountain Pumped Storage Project (FERC Project), licensed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) in 2014. The BLM is issuing a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) on the Proposed Action. The FERC Project would be located on approximately 1,150 acres of BLM-managed land and approximately 1,377 acres of private land. Of the 1,150 acres of BLM-managed land, 507 acres are in the 16-mile gen-tie line alignment; 154 acres are in the water supply pipeline alignment and other Proposed Action facilities outside the Central Project Area; and approximately 489 acres are lands within the Central Project Area of the hydropower project.
    [Show full text]
  • California Vegetation Map in Support of the DRECP
    CALIFORNIA VEGETATION MAP IN SUPPORT OF THE DESERT RENEWABLE ENERGY CONSERVATION PLAN (2014-2016 ADDITIONS) John Menke, Edward Reyes, Anne Hepburn, Deborah Johnson, and Janet Reyes Aerial Information Systems, Inc. Prepared for the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Renewable Energy Program and the California Energy Commission Final Report May 2016 Prepared by: Primary Authors John Menke Edward Reyes Anne Hepburn Deborah Johnson Janet Reyes Report Graphics Ben Johnson Cover Page Photo Credits: Joshua Tree: John Fulton Blue Palo Verde: Ed Reyes Mojave Yucca: John Fulton Kingston Range, Pinyon: Arin Glass Aerial Information Systems, Inc. 112 First Street Redlands, CA 92373 (909) 793-9493 ais@aisgis.com in collaboration with California Department of Fish and Wildlife Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program 1807 13th Street, Suite 202 Sacramento, CA 95811 and California Native Plant Society 2707 K Street, Suite 1 Sacramento, CA 95816 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Funding for this project was provided by: California Energy Commission US Bureau of Land Management California Wildlife Conservation Board California Department of Fish and Wildlife Personnel involved in developing the methodology and implementing this project included: Aerial Information Systems: Lisa Cotterman, Mark Fox, John Fulton, Arin Glass, Anne Hepburn, Ben Johnson, Debbie Johnson, John Menke, Lisa Morse, Mike Nelson, Ed Reyes, Janet Reyes, Patrick Yiu California Department of Fish and Wildlife: Diana Hickson, Todd Keeler‐Wolf, Anne Klein, Aicha Ougzin, Rosalie Yacoub California
    [Show full text]
  • Pamphlet SIM 3411: Geologic Map of the Castle Rock 7.5' Quadrangle
    Geologic Map of the Castle Rock 7.5’ Quadrangle, Arizona and California By P. Kyle House, Barbara E. John, Daniel V. Malmon, Debra Block, L. Sue Beard, Tracey J. Felger, Ryan S. Crow, Jonathan E. Schwing, and Colleen E. Cassidy Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3411 Kayaker's view of Castle Rock (unit Tac) looking north-northeast from Castle Rock Bay, Arizona. The northern Mohave Mountains are visible in left background, and sediments of the Chemehuevi Formation (unit Qch) are seen along right edge of photo. Photograph taken August 27, 2014, by Kyle House, USGS. 2018 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior RYAN K. ZINKE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey James F. Reilly II, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2018 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov/ or call 1–888–ASK–USGS (1–888–275–8747). For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://store.usgs.gov. To order USGS information products, visit https://store.usgs.gov/. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: House, P.K., John, B.E., Malmon, D.V., Block, Debra, Beard, L.S., Felger, T.J., Crow, R.S., Schwing, J.E., and Cassidy, C.E., 2018, Geologic map of the Castle Rock 7.5’ quadrangle: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemehuevi Valley Special Recreation Management Area (SRMA)
    Chemehuevi Valley Special Recreation Management Area (SRMA) The Chemehuevi Valley Viewshed with the Turtle Mountains National Natural Landmark is directly west of the communities of Havasu Landing, California and Lake Havasu City, Arizona. The Turtle Mountains Natural Landmark is an excellent illustration of volcanic phenomena with superimposed sculpturing of mountain landforms. In combination, the eastern and western sections present some of the finest geological formations in the Mohave Desert. The site is of scenic value and interest; it also contains excellent examples of Mohave Desert flora and fauna. From October to April each year hundreds of travelers “snowbirds” from the northeastern United States, Canada and Europe journey to the area to enjoy the mild winter climate seeking new experiences, enjoying vast landscape which have not existed in European Nations for hundreds of years. Visitors participate in backcountry touring adventure and the discovery of new hiking trails, rock hounding sites and camping opportunities. The Chemehuevi Reservation Havasu Landing Resort depends on the naturalness of the Chemehuevi Valley to support the recreation pursuits of their visitors. The Needles Field Office has developed a system of designated trails entitled the Mojave Adventure Routes in regards to the 2002 Northern and Eastern Colorado Desert Coordinated Management Plan item 3.8.7. These routes are an outstanding network of 4x4 vehicle backcountry touring routes for motorized recreation. These routes were developed for the purpose of traveling to areas not often seen by many people. This network is a shared-use trail system providing recreation opportunities for all persons, including those who use street-legal and non-street legal (Green Sticker) vehicles, hikers, bicyclists, and equestrians.
    [Show full text]
  • Recruitment of Desert Tortoises (Gopherus Agassizii and G
    Herpetological Conservation and Biology 10(2):583–591. Submitted: 29 September 2014; Accepted: 7 April 2015; Published: 31 August 2015. RECRUITMENT OF DESERT TORTOISES (GOPHERUS AGASSIZII AND G. MORAFKAI): A SYNTHESIS OF REPRODUCTION AND FIRST-YEAR SURVIVAL STEVEN P. CAMPBELL1,2,3, ROBERT J. STEIDL1, AND ERIN R. ZYLSTRA1 1School of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA 2Albany Pine Bush Preserve Commission, Albany, New York 12205, USA 3Corresponding author, email: scampbell@albanypinebush.org Abstract.—Recruitment is integral to population persistence, therefore characterizing this process is essential for evaluating recovery actions for species in decline. We gathered all data available and used Bayesian analyses to quantify annual recruitment of Mojave Desert (Gopherus agassizii) and Sonoran Desert (G. morafkai) tortoises as the product of four components: proportion of females that reproduced, number of eggs produced per reproducing female, hatching success, and hatchling survival. For Mojave Desert Tortoises, the estimated proportion of females that reproduced (0.81 [95% Credible Interval: 0.52–0.99]) and number of eggs produced per year (6.90 [5.51–8.16]) were higher than for Sonoran Desert Tortoises (0.52 [0.07–0.94] and 5.17 [3.05–7.60], respectively). For Mojave Desert Tortoises, hatching success averaged 0.61 (0.25–0.90). Data on hatching success for Sonoran Desert Tortoises and hatchling survival for both species were sparse, therefore we represented these components with a range of plausible values. When we combined components, average recruitment for Mojave Desert Tortoises ranged from 0.51 females/female/y assuming that hatchling survival was 0.30 to 1.18 females/female/y with hatchling survival assumed to be 0.70.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix G1:Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment
    Appendix G1 Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment CONFIDENTIAL - NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment Prepared for November 2011 Santa Margarita Water District 26111 Antonio Parkway Rancho Santa Margarita, CA Draft CONFIDENTIAL - NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment Prepared for November 2011 Santa Margarita Water District 26111 Antonio Parkway Rancho Santa Margarita, CA Prepared By: ESA 626 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Project site location: Cadiz, Cadiz Summit, Cadiz Lake NW, Cadiz Lake NE, Calumet Mine, Chubbuck, Milligan, East of Milligan, Danby Lake, Sablon, and Arica Mountains (CA) USGS 7.5’ Topographic Maps T1S R19E, 20E; T1N R18E, 19E; T2N R17E, 18E; 3N R16E, 17E; 4N R15E, 16E; 5N R14E, 15E Principal Investigator: Monica Strauss, M.A. Report Authors: Madeleine Bray, M.A, Candace Ehringer, M.A., Brian S. Marks, Ph.D. Keywords: San Bernardino County, Cadiz, Milligan, Archer, Freda, Chubbuck, Ward, Siam, Saltmarsh, Sablon, Fishel, Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad, Parker Cutoff, General George Patton Desert Training Center, Railroad Siding, Archaeological Survey 626 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 213.599.4300 www.esassoc.com Oakland Olympia Orlando Palm Springs Petaluma Portland Sacramento San Diego San Francisco Seattle Tampa Woodland Hills 210324 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cadiz Valley Water Conservation, Recovery,
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Geological Survey and A. M. Leszcykowski and J. D. Causey U.S
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR TO ACCOMPANY MAP MF-1603-A UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MINERAL RESOURCE POTENTIAL OF THE COXCOMB MOUNTAINS WILDERNESS STUDY AREA (CDCA-328), SAN BERNARDINO AND RIVERSIDE COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA SUMMARY REPORT By J. P. Calzia, J. E. Kilburn, R. W. Simpson, Jr., and C. M. Alien U.S. Geological Survey and A. M. Leszcykowski and J. D. Causey U.S. Bureau of Mines STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS Bureau of Land Management Wilderness Study Areas The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Public Law 94-579, October 21, 1976) requires the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines to conduct mineral surveys on certain areas to determine their mineral resource potential. Results must be made available to the public and be submitted to the President and the Congress. This report presents the results of a mineral survey of the Coxcomb Mountains Wilderness Study Area (CDCA-328), California Desert Conservation Area, Riverside and San Bernardino Counties, California. SUMMARY Geologic, geochemical, geophysical, and mineral surveys within the Coxcomb Mountains Wilderness Study Area in south­ eastern California define several areas with low to moderate potential for base and precious metals. Inferred subeconomic re­ sources of gold at the Moser mine (area Ha) are estimated at 150,000 tons averaging 1.7 ppm Au. The remainder of the study area has low potential for other mineral and energy resources including radioactive minerals and geothermal resources. Oil, gas, and coal resources are not present within the wilderness study area. INTRODUCTION Hope (1966), Greene (1968), and Calzia (1982) indicate that the wilderness study area is underlain by metaigneous and The Coxcomb Mountains Wilderness Study Area metasedimentary rocks of Jurassic and (or) older age intruded (CDCA-328) is located in the Mojave Desert of southeastern by granitic rocks of Late Jurassic to Late Cretaceous age.
    [Show full text]
  • BLM Worksheets
    10 18 " 13 4 47 ! ! ! 47 " " 11 Piute Valley and Sacramento Mountains 54 " ! ! 87 12 ! 81 " 4 55 61 22 " ! " Pinto Lucerne Valley and Eastern Slopes ! 63 33 " 56 " " " 36 25 Colorado Desert " 20 ! " " 59 37 ! 2 ! 19 " ! 16 19 ! 56 21 " ! ! 15 27 ! 38 Arizona Lake Cahuilla 72 Lake Cahuilla 48 57 " ! ! 57 ! " 34 35 84 ! " 42 76 ! 26 41 ! " 0 5 10 14 58I Miles 28 " " 43 ! ! ! ! 8!9 Existing " Proposed DRECPSubareas 66 62 Colorado Desert Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan (DRECP) ACECs within the Colorado Desert Subarea # Proposed ACECs 12 Cadiz Valley Chuckwalla Central 19 (covered in Chuckwalla, see below)) Chuckwalla Extension 20 (covered in Chuckwalla, see below) Chuckwalla Mountains Central 21 (covered in Corn Springs, see below) 22 Chuckwalla to Chemehuevi Tortoise Linkage Joshua Tree to Palen Corridor 33 (covered in Chuckwalla to Chemehuevi Tortoise Linkage) 36 McCoy Valley 37 McCoy Wash 38 Mule McCoy 44 Palen Ford Playa Dunes 48 Picacho Turtle Mountains Corridor 55 (covered in Chuckwalla to Chemehuevi Tortoise Linkage) 56 Upper McCoy # Existing ACECs (within DRECP boundary) 2 Alligator Rock 15 Chuckwalla 16 Chuckwalla Valley Dune Thicket 19 Corn Springs 25 Desert Lily Preserve 56 Mule Mountains 59 Palen Dry Lake 61 Patton's Iron Mountain Divisional Camp 81 Turtle Mountains Cadiz Valley Description/Location: North of Hwy 62, south of Hwy 40 between the Sheep Hole mountains to the west and the Chemehuevi ACEC to the east. Nationally Significant Values: Ecological: The Cadiz Valley contains an enormous variation of Mojave vegetation, from Ajo Lilies to Mojave Yucca. Bighorn, deer and mountain lion easily migrate between basin and range mountains of the Sheephole, Calumet Mountains, Iron Mountains, Kilbeck Hills and Old Woman Mountains with little or no human infrastructure limits.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemehuevi Valley Groundwater Basin Bulletin 118
    Hydrologic Region Colorado River California’s Groundwater Chemehuevi Valley Groundwater Basin Bulletin 118 Chemehuevi Valley Groundwater Basin • Groundwater Basin Number: 7-43 • County: San Bernardino • Surface Area: 273,000 acres (427 square miles) Basin Boundaries and Hydrology This basin underlies Chemehuevi Valley in eastern San Bernardino County. The basin is bounded by Havasu Lake on the east and by nonwater-bearing rocks of the Sacramento Mountains on the north, of the Chemehuevi Mountains on the northeast, of the Whipple Mountains on the southeast, of the Turtle Mountains on the west and south (Bishop 1963). The valley is drained by Chemehuevi Wash to Havasu Lake. Annual average precipitation ranges from about 4 to 6 inches. Hydrogeologic Information Water Bearing Formations Groundwater in the basin is found in alluvium and the Bouse Formation. Alluvium. Holocene age younger alluvium, which is found in washes and the floodplain of the Colorado River, is composed of sand, silt and gravel (Metzger and Loeltz 1973). Older alluvium consists of unconsolidated, fine- to coarse-grained sand, pebbles, and boulders with variable amounts of silt and clay. Bouse Formation. The Pliocene age Bouse Formation is composed of a basal limestone bed overlain by interbedded clay, silt, and sand. Thickness of the formation reaches 254 feet (Metzger and Loeltz 1973). The formation is underlain by locally derived fanglomerate and overlain by alluviums of the Colorado River and its tributaries. Restrictive Structures An unnamed fault crosses a portion of the southern side of the basin (Bishop 1963), but it is not known whether or not this fault impedes groundwater flow in the basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Forwards DOI Request for LLNL Tritium Tests at Ward Valley
    - _ . - . - - . .. -_. - .. - - - * . March 19, 1996 NOTE T0: X. Stablein J. Austin ; C. Paperiello M. Bell ' J. Greeves J. Holonich M. Federline B. Reamer M. Weber C. Cameron P. Lohaus J. Kennedy P. Sobel FROM: Nelson,[[[ SUBJECT: DOE STAFF POSITION ON DOI REQUEST FOR LLNL TRITIUM TESTS AT WARD ! VALLEY ! The attached staff position paper was provided to us by Terry Plummer, ! DOE, last week and is forwarded FYI. ; Attachment: As stated | | l, i l ! ! 1 ! t l' 970 g;g,60pe, - 1 - , - - . - - - - - - 4 , ' . I 1 * , . i. > !. 4 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR REQUEST FOR LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORA'IORY i 70 i PERFORM TRTITUM TF.STS AT WARD VALLEY, CALIFORNIA | f FACTS / BACKGROUND , i - On February 23,1996, John Garamendi, Deputy Secretary of the Depiu unent of the Interior, requested the participation of the De,partment of Energy in contracting with the Lawrence i Livermore National Laboratory to perform tntium tests at the State licensed low-level radioactive waste (LLW) disposal facility in Ward Valley, Califomia. * On Demhn 15,1995, Secretary O' leary denied a similar request dated June 8,1995, : from Senator Boxer, (D-CA). 'Ihe Secretary stated that,"We believe the State of California, in its ! licensing role as authorized by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, should determine how to implement the National Academy of Sciences' recommendations. If the State Mermines that further testing is needed based on analytical services unique to the Departmw of Energy, we will consider such a request." l ! + In response to an earlier request of Senator Boxer, Secretary Babbitt asked the National ! Academy of Sciences (NAS) to examine several key safety related issues of the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Rice Valley Groundwater Basin Bulletin 118
    Colorado River Hydrologic Region California’s Groundwater Rice Valley Groundwater Basin Bulletin 118 Rice Valley Groundwater Basin • Groundwater Basin Number: 7-4 • County: Riverside, San Bernardino • Surface Area: 189,000 acres (295 square miles) Basin Boundaries and Hydrology This groundwater basin underlies Rice Valley in northeast Riverside and southeast San Bernardino Counties. Elevation of the valley floor ranges from about 675 feet above sea level near the center of the valley to about 1,000 feet along the outer margins. The basin is bounded by nonwater- bearing rocks of the Turtle Mountains on the north, the Little Maria and Big Maria Mountains on the south, the Arica Mountains on the west, and by the West Riverside and Riverside Mountains on the east. Low-lying alluvial drainage divides form a portion of the basin boundaries on the northwest and northeast, and the Colorado River bounds a portion of the basin on the east. Maximum elevations of the surrounding mountains range to about 2,000 feet in the Arica Mountains, about 3,000 feet in the Big Maria Mountains, and 5,866 feet at Horn Peak in the Turtle Mountains (Bishop 1963; Jennings 1967; USGS 1971a, 1971b, 1983a, 1983b, 1983c). Annual average precipitation ranges from about 3 to 5 inches. Surface runoff from the mountains drains towards the center of the valley, except in the eastern part of the valley, where Big Wash drains to the Colorado River (USGS 1971a, 1971b, 1983a, 1983b, 1983c). Hydrogeologic Information Water Bearing Formations Alluvium is the water-bearing material that forms the basin and includes unconsolidated Holocene age deposits and underlying unconsolidated to semi-consolidated Pleistocene deposits (DWR 1954, 1963).
    [Show full text]
  • Sentinel 10-27
    The San Bernardino County News of Note from Around the Largest County in the Lower 48 States Friday, OctoberSentinel 27, 2017 A Fortunado Publication in conjunction with Countywide News Service 10808 Foothill Blvd. Suite 160-446 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (951) 567-1936 Wonder Valley Chromium & Arsenic H2O Levels 1,000 Times Over Limit Industry’s Tres By Mark Gutglueck Indications are, how- miles northeast of the Amboy Road and State nent living structures Hermanos Sun The San Bernardino ever, that there is no east entrance to Joshua Route 62 run through built by homesteaders County Fire Depart- county agency mandated Tree National Park. The Wonder Valley and ex- under the Small Tract Power Plan ment’s reflexive move to with responsibility to town lies south of the ist as the community’s Act, also known as the Begets Greater protect its firefighters in safeguard residents and Sheep Hole Mountains primary paved roads, “Baby Homestead Act,” reaction to the discovery their drinking water sup- and Bullion Mountains with the vast major- between 1938 and the Uncertainty of well water contamina- ply in the face of the risk and north of the Pinto ity of the community’s mid-1960s, once dot- tion in Wonder Valley that has been identified. Mountains at an eleva- streets existing as dirt ted the landscape in the is raising the specter of Wonder Valley is an tion range of 1,200 feet roads or ones that have 150-square-mile area, a wider contamination unincorporated com- to 1,800 feet near the been oiled and impacted.
    [Show full text]