Dehydrogenation of Formic Acid to CO2 and H2 by Manganese(I)–Complex: Theoretical Insights for Green and Sustainable Route

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dehydrogenation of Formic Acid to CO2 and H2 by Manganese(I)–Complex: Theoretical Insights for Green and Sustainable Route catalysts Article Dehydrogenation of Formic Acid to CO2 and H2 by Manganese(I)–Complex: Theoretical Insights for Green and Sustainable Route Tiziana Marino * and Mario Prejanò Dipartimento di Chimica e Tecnologie Chimiche, Università della Calabria, Ponte P. Bucci cubo 14 C, Arcavacata di Rende, CAP 87036 Cosenza, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-0984492085 Abstract: In this work, a detailed computational study on a recently synthetized Mn(I)-dependent tBu + complex [( PNNOP)Mn(CO)2] is reported. This species promotes the dehydrogenation of formic acid to carbon dioxide and hydrogen. The here proposed catalytic cycle proceeds through the tBu tBu + formation of stabilized adduct between [( PNNOP )Mn(CO)2] and formate and the progressive release of CO2 and H2, mediated by the presence of trimethylamine. In order to evaluate the influence of the environment on the catalytic activity, different solvents have been taken into account. The computed barriers and the geometrical parameters account well for the available experimental data, confirming the robustness of the complex and reproducing its good catalytic performance. Outcomes from the present investigation can stimulate further experimental works in the design of new more efficient catalysts devoted to H2 production. Keywords: CO ;H ; formic acid; transition state; DFT 2 2 Citation: Marino, T.; Prejanò, M. Dehydrogenation of Formic Acid to 1. Introduction CO2 and H2 by Manganese(I)–Complex: Theoretical The increasing need for new and sustainable energetic resources represents one of Insights for Green and Sustainable the most important challenges characterizing the current century [1,2]. Indeed, fossil fuels, Route. Catalysts 2021, 11, 141. gas, coal and nuclear energy are still widely used, but environmentally dangerous, energy https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11 sources [2–5]. The intensive use of fossil fuels, for example, has been directly linked to 010141 the increasing level of CO2 and greenhouse gas emissions, dramatically influencing the climate changes [3]. Received: 4 January 2021 For these reasons, in the last fifty years, the interest devoted to possible “green” Accepted: 16 January 2021 alternatives, like the use of sunlight-, wind- and water-based energies [6], have been Published: 19 January 2021 increased, but, despite their promising efficiency, different technical issues are related to them and in particular to the storage of energy vectors on large scale [7]. Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral One of the possible solutions is represented by the so-called sustainable hydrogen with regard to jurisdictional claims in economy [8–11]. In this route, indeed, the electricity is converted in a secondary chemical published maps and institutional affil- energy carrier that can be used on demand [12–16]. The combustion of H2 in the presence iations. of O2, in devices like fuel cells, formally produces electricity and H2O, a green product. On the other hand, the H2 is not present on earth and it can be obtained/stored from/in organic compounds, like methanol and formic acid (FA) [17–19]. In particular, since its chemical-physical properties and its involvement in chemical industries and biomass Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. production, the FA is believed a promising species for the hydrogen economy [1,2,20,21]. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. The dehydrogenation of FA, which generates CO2 and H2, (Scheme1) is usually mediated This article is an open access article by metal-containing catalysts. distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/). Catalysts 2021, 11, 141. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11010141 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/catalysts CatalystsCatalystsCatalysts2021 20212021,,11, 1111,, 141, xx FORFOR PEERPEER REVIEWREVIEW 222 of ofof 10 1010 Scheme 1. Conversion of formic acid in CO2 and H2. SchemeScheme 1.1. ConversionConversion ofof formicformic acidacid inin COCO22 and H2.. InInIn detail, detail,detail, the thethe most mostmost widely widelywidely adopted adoptedadopted species speciesspecies contain cocontainntain Pd, Pd,Pd, Pt, Pt,Pt, Ir, RhIr,Ir, RhRh and anan Rudd Ru (seeRu (see(seerefs refsrefs [22 – [22–[22–26] 2 6− −1 as26]26] recent asas recentrecent examples), examples),examples), with withwith turnover turnoverturnover frequencies frequenciesfrequencies (TOFs) (TOFs)(TOFs) variating variatingvariating from fromfrom 10 21010to2 toto 10 10106 h6 hh−11 [ [27].[27].27]. SinceSinceSince allall these these species species containcontain contain preciousprecious precious metalsmetals metals,,, nowadaysnowadays nowadays oneone one ofof of thethe the mainmain main goalsgoals goals isis synthe-synthe- is syn- thesizingsizingsizing complexescomplexes complexes containingcontaining containing equallyequally equally efficientefficient efficient metalmetal metal ionsions ions belongingbelonging belonging toto thethe to firstfirst the row firstrow of rowof tran-tran- of transitionsitionsition series,series, series, whichwhich which areare arenotoriouslynotoriously notoriously cheapercheaper cheaper andand and moremore more abundantabundant abundant inin thethe in theEarth’sEarth’s Earth’s crust.crust. crust. PromisingPromisingPromising solutions solutionssolutions can cancan arise arisearise bybyby Fe-basedFe-basedFe-based catalystscatalysts showingshowing turnoverturnover valuesvalues compa-compa- rablerablerable tototo thosethosethose containingcontainingcontaining preciouspreciousprecious metals,metals,metals, butbutbut stillstillstill demandingdemandingdemanding ananan improvementimprovementimprovement ofofof their theirtheir catalyticcatalyticcatalytic efficiency efficiencyefficiency [ [28–30].28[28–30].–30]. In InIn addition, adaddition,dition, these thesethese species speciesspecies require requirerequire the thethe presence presencepresence of ofof a aa general generalgeneral base basebase ++ andandand Lewis LewisLewis acid, acid,acid, like likelike Li LiLi+,, to to explicate explicate the the catalysis catalysis [[29].[29].29]. VeryVeryVery recently,recently, forfor aa a newnew new synthesizedsynthesized synthesized complexcomplex complex ofof Mn(I)-basedMn(I)-based of Mn(I)-based complex,complex, complex, fastfast catalyzedcatalyzed fast cat- alyzeddehydrogenationdehydrogenation dehydrogenation ofof formicformic of acidacid formic hashas acidbeenbeen has describeddescribed been described [31].[31]. TheThe organometallicorganometallic [31]. The organometallic compound,compound, tbu + tbu compound, having the structuretbu [( PNNOPMn(CO)2 + ] (2), withtbu PNNOP = 2,6-(di-tert- havinghaving thethe structurestructure [([(tbuPNNOPMn(CO)PNNOPMn(CO)2]]+ ((22),), 2withwith tbuPNNOPPNNOP == 2,6-(di-tert-bu-2,6-(di-tert-bu- butylphosphinito)(di-tert-butylphosphinamine)pyridine),tylphosphinito)(di-tert-butylphosphinamine)pyridine),tylphosphinito)(di-tert-butylphosphinamine)pyridine), exhibitedexhibited exhibited substantiallysubstantially higherhigherhigher catalyticcatalyticcatalytic activityactivityactivity withwithwith respect respectrespect to toto the thethe unique uniqueunique known knownknown Mn-dependent Mn-dependentMn-dependent complex complexcomplex acting actingacting on onon the thethe −1−1 formicformicformic acidacidacid [ [32],32[32],], with withwith TOFs TOFsTOFs improved improvedimproved to toto the thethe value valuevalue of ofof 8500 85008500 h hh−1 [ [31].[31].31]. TheTheThe reactionreactionreaction requires requiresrequires the presence of a proton-acceptor system, but intriguingly the catalysis was not affected by thethe presencepresence ofof aa proton-acceptorproton-acceptor system,system, bubutt intriguinglyintriguingly thethe catalysiscatalysis waswas notnot affectedaffected the nature of the base [31]. byby thethe naturenature ofof thethe basebase [31].[31]. tbutbu InIn addition,addition, thethe contribution contribution ofof the the hybrid hybrid tbuPNNOPPNNOP ligandligand hashas beenbeen highlighted,highlighted, In addition, thetbu contributiontBu of the hybrid PNNOP ligand has been highlighted, tbu tBu sincesince attemptsattempts with with tbuPONOPPONOP ((tBuPONOPPONOP =2,6-bis(di-tert-butylphosphinito)pyridine,=2,6-bis(di-tert-butylphosphinito)pyridine, 44)) sincetbu attempts withtBu PONOP ( PONOP =2,6-bis(di-tert-butylphosphinito)pyridine, 4) and tbuPNNNP ( tBu PNNNP = 2,6-bis (di-tert-butylphosphinamine)pyridine, 5), two ligands andand tbuPNNNPPNNNP ((tBuPNNNPPNNNP == 2,6-bis2,6-bis (di-tert-butylphosphinamine)pyridine,(di-tert-butylphosphinamine)pyridine, 55),), twotwo ligandsligands tested on a previous Ru-based organometallic complex and depicted in Scheme2[33] , did testedtested onon aa previousprevious Ru-basedRu-based organometallicorganometallic complexcomplex andand depicteddepicted inin SchemeScheme 22 [33],[33], diddid not provide remarkable catalytic activity [31]. notnot provideprovide remarkableremarkable catalyticcatalytic activityactivity [31].[31]. SchemeSchemeScheme 2. 2.2. The TheThe three threethree ligands ligandsligands (on (on(on the thethetop toptop)) and) andand the thethe three threethree related relatedrelated complexes complexescomplexes (on (on(on the thethebottom bottombottom). The).). TheThe name ofnamename the complexesofof thethe complexescomplexes has been hashas retained beenbeen retainedretained according accordingaccording to the experimental toto thethe experimentalexperimental work [ 31 workwork]. [31].[31]. Encouraged by the results’ novelty,
Recommended publications
  • Allyson M. Buytendyk
    DISCOVERING THE ELECTRONIC PROPERTIES OF METAL HYDRIDES, METAL OXIDES AND ORGANIC MOLECULES USING ANION PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY by Allyson M. Buytendyk A dissertation submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland September, 2015 © 2015 Allyson M. Buytendyk All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT Negatively charged molecular ions were studied in the gas phase using anion photoelectron spectroscopy. By coupling theory with the experimentally measured electronic structure, the geometries of the neutral and anion complexes could be predicted. The experiments were conducted using a one-of-a-kind time- of-flight mass spectrometer coupled with a pulsed negative ion photoelectron spectrometer. The molecules studied include metal oxides, metal hydrides, aromatic heterocylic organic compounds, and proton-coupled organic acids. Metal oxides serve as catalysts in reactions from many scientific fields and understanding the catalysis process at the molecular level could help improve reaction efficiencies - - (Chapter 1). The experimental investigation of the super-alkali anions, Li3O and Na3O , revealed both photodetachment and photoionization occur due to the low ionization potential of both neutral molecules. Additionally, HfO- and ZrO- were studied, and although both Hf and Zr have very similar atomic properties, their oxides differ greatly where ZrO- has a much lower electron affinity than HfO-. In the pursuit of using hydrogen as an environmentally friendly fuel alternative, a practical method for storing hydrogen is necessary and metal hydrides are thought to be the answer (Chapter 2). Studies yielding structural and electronic information about the hydrogen - - bonding/interacting in the complex, such as in MgH and AlH4 , are vital to constructing a practical hydrogen storage device.
    [Show full text]
  • Determination of Formic Acid in Acetic Acid for Industrial Use by Agilent 7820A GC
    Determination of Formic Acid in Acetic Acid for Industrial Use by Agilent 7820A GC Application Brief Wenmin Liu, Chunxiao Wang HPI With rising prices of crude oil and a future shortage of oil and gas resources, people Highlights are relying on the development of the coal chemical industry. • The Agilent 7820A GC coupled with Acetic acid is an important intermediate in coal chemical synthesis. It is used in the a µTCD provides a simple method production of polyethylene, cellulose acetate, and polyvinyl, as well as synthetic for analysis of formic acid in acetic fibres and fabrics. The production of acetic acid will remain high over the next three acid. years. In China, it is estimated that the production capacity of alcohol-to-acetic acid would be 730,000 tons per year in 2010. • ALS and EPC ensure good repeata- biltiy and ease of use which makes The purity of acetic acid determinates the quality of the final synthetic products. the 7820GC appropriate for routine Formic acid is one of the main impurities in acetic acid. Many analytical methods for analysis in QA/QC labs. the analysis of formic acid in acetic acid have been developed using gas chromatog- • Using a capillary column as the ana- raphy. For example, in the GB/T 1628.5-2000 method, packed column and manual lytical column ensures better sepa- sample injection is used with poor separation and repeatability which impacts the ration of formic acid in acetic acid quantification of formic acid. compared to the China GB method. In this application brief, a new analytical method was developed on a new Agilent GC platform, the Agilent 7820A GC System.
    [Show full text]
  • Ester Synthesis Lab (Student Handout)
    Name: ________________________ Lab Partner: ____________________ Date: __________________________ Class Period: ____________________ Ester Synthesis Lab (Student Handout) Lab Report Components: The following must be included in your lab book in order to receive full credit. 1. Purpose 2. Hypothesis 3. Procedure 4. Observation/Data Table 5. Results 6. Mechanism (In class) 7. Conclusion Introduction The compounds you will be making are also naturally occurring compounds; the chemical structure of these compounds is already known from other investigations. Esters are organic molecules of the general form: where R1 and R2 are any carbon chain. Esters are unique in that they often have strong, pleasant odors. As such, they are often used in fragrances, and many artificial flavorings are in fact esters. Esters are produced by the reaction between alcohols and carboxylic acids. For example, reacting ethanol with acetic acid to give ethyl acetate is shown below. + → + In the case of ethyl acetate, R1 is a CH3 group and R2 is a CH3CH2 group. Naming esters systematically requires naming the functional groups on both sides of the bridging oxygen. In the example above, the right side of the ester as shown is a CH3CH2 1 group, or ethyl group. The left side is CH3C=O, or acetate. The name of the ester is therefore ethyl acetate. Deriving the names of the side from the carboxylic acid merely requires replacing the suffix –ic with –ate. Materials • Alcohol • Carboxylic Acid o 1 o A o 2 o B o 3 o C o 4 Observation Parameters: • Record the combination of carboxylic acid and alcohol • Observe each reactant • Observe each product Procedure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplement of Investigation of Secondary Formation of Formic Acid: Urban Environment Vs
    Supplement of Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 14, 24863–24914, 2014 http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/14/24863/2014/ doi:10.5194/acpd-14-24863-2014-supplement © Author(s) 2014. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Supplement of Investigation of secondary formation of formic acid: urban environment vs. oil and gas producing region B. Yuan et al. Correspondence to: B. Yuan ([email protected]) 31 Table S1. Comparisons of measured and modeled formic acid in previous studies. Studies Location and time Model Notes Atlantic Ocean 1 MOGUNTIA Model results are 8 times lower than observations. (1996.10-11) Amazonia, Congo, Model underestimates HCOOH both in free 2 MOGUNTIA Virginia troposphere and boundary layer. Marine air, and MATCH- Measurements are underestimated by a factor of 2 or 3 those in Poisson et MPIC more, except in Amazon. al. MATCH- Measured concentrations are substantially higher than 4 Kitt Peak, US MPIC the model-calculated values. Model underestimates HCOOH compared to 5 Various sites IMPACT observations at most sites. Various sites Sources of formic acid may be up to 50% greater than 6 (MILAGRO, GEOS-Chem the estimates and the study reports evidence of a long- INTEX-B) lived missing secondary source of formic acid. Model underestimates HCOOH concentrations by up Trajectory to a factor of 2. The missing sources are considered to model with 7 North Sea (2010.3) be both primary emissions of HCOOH of MCM V3.2 & anthropogenic origin and a lack of precursor CRI emissions, e.g. isoprene. The globally source of formic acid (100-120 Tg) is 2-3 Satellite times more than that estimated from known sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Biomass Oxidation to Formic Acid in Aqueous Media Using Polyoxometalate Catalysts – Boosting FA Selectivity by In-Situ Extraction
    Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Energy & Environmental Science. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015 Biomass Oxidation to Formic Acid in Aqueous Media Using Polyoxometalate Catalysts – Boosting FA Selectivity by In-situ Extraction Supplementary Information Determination of distribution coefficients A model reaction solution containing 0.91 g of the HPA-5 catalyst, 10.18 g FA and 50.0 g water was prepared. This solution was stirred with 50.91 g of the extracting solvent at 363 K for one hour and then transferred into a separation funnel. After phase separation, a sample of each phase was taken and analysed by means of 1H-NMR to determine the formic acid concentration. Extraction Solvent Screening Table S1: Solvent screening to identify a suitable extraction solvent - extraction of a simulated product solution. Distribution coefficient K Selectivity Extracting agent a b cFA,org./cFA,aqu KFA/Kwater 1-Hexanol 0.94 8.6 1-Heptanol 0.67 4.4 Butylethylether 0.49 2.7 Benzyl formate 0.46 2.6 Heptyl formate 0.42 2.2 Di-isopropylether 0.40 2.5 Di-n-butylether 0.22 1.2 Conditions: 10.18 g formic acid, 0.91 g (0.5 mmol) HPA-5 catalyst dissolved in 50.0 mL H2O, together with 50.91 g of the extracting solvent; stirred at 363 K; 1 h. a) as determined by 1H-NMR using benzene as external standard; b) ratio of the distribution coefficients of formic acid and water. Table S2: Esterification activity of formic acid with 1-hexanol and 1-heptanol, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Formic Acid Acetic Acid Propionic Acid Butyric Acid Valeric Acid Caproic
    Organic Acids: Formic acid Citric acid Acetic acid Malic acid Propionic acid Benzoic acid Butyric acid Tartaric acid Valeric acid Caproic acid Oxalic acid Lactic acid Organic Bases: Pyridine Imidazole (solid) Benzimidazole Aniline TEA (tri-ethyl amine) Histidine Nitroaniline Imidazole (dissolved) Amino bases/ Nucleotides ממסים אורגניים (מכילים קשר פחמן-מימן): :(Organic Solvents (contains carbon-hydrogen bond Xylene DMF Hexane Parafine oil Ethylacetate Formamide IPA Piperidine Trizol/Trireagent Butanol SDS (solid) Acetone PMSF (Phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride) Methanol Tween PFA RNA / DNA (kit parts that contains thioisocyanate) Toluene BME (beta mercaptoethanol) DMSO Ethylenglycol Ethanol Halogenated Organic Solvents (contains F, Cl, Br, I): ממסים אורגניים הלוגניים (מכילים F, Cl, Br, I) Chloroform (CHCl3) Methylene chloride Vinyl chloride Tetrafluoroethylene (CF2 =CF2) Trichloroethylene (CHCl=CCl2) Bromoethane Tert-Butyl bromide חומרים אנאורגניים (חומרים שהם לא חומצה/בסיס אנאורגני) Inorganic Materials (are not inorganic acid/base) LiCl Salts (such as MgCl2, CaCl) Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) Metals (Cu, Pb, Na etc.) Ammonium thiocyanate (NH4SCN) Sodium Azide (NaN3) Ammonium azide (NH4N3) בסיסים אנאורגניים :Inorganic Bases NH3 NaOH NH4OH Ba(OH)2 NaOH (dissolved) Ca(OH)2 KOH (dissolved) CaCO3 KOH חומצות אנאורגניות: :Inorganic Acids Boric acid (H3BO3) Hydrochloric acid (HCl) Hydrofluoric acid (HF) Nitric acid (HNO3) Hydrobromic acid (HBr) Phosphoric acid (H3PO4) Perchloric acid (HClO4) Sulfuric acid (H2SO4) Hydroiodic acid (HI) Cytotoxic materials:
    [Show full text]
  • Defensive Production of Formic Acid (80%) by a Carabid Beetle (Galerita Lecontei) (Predation͞chemical Defense͞secretory Rate͞carabidae)
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 94, pp. 6792–6797, June 1997 Ecology Defensive production of formic acid (80%) by a carabid beetle (Galerita lecontei) (predationychemical defenseysecretory rateyCarabidae) CARMEN ROSSINI*, ATHULA B. ATTYGALLE†,ANDRE´S GONZA´LEZ*, SCOTT R. SMEDLEY*, MARIA EISNER*, JERROLD MEINWALD†, AND THOMAS EISNER*‡ *Section of Neurobiology and Behavior and †Department of Chemistry, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853 Contributed by Thomas Eisner, April 14, 1997 ABSTRACT The carabid beetle Galerita lecontei has a pair near Lake Placid, Highlands County, FL. The few G. janus that of abdominal defensive glands that secrete a mixture of formic were also used were collected under rocks near streams in acid, acetic acid, and lipophilic components (long-chain hy- Ithaca, Tompkins County, NY. The beetles were kept in drocarbons and esters). Formic acid, at the concentration of groups in containers with soil, and maintained for weeks on 80%, is the principal constituent. The beetle ejects the secre- freshly cut up mealworms (larvae of Tenebrio molitor) and tion as a spray, which it aims accurately toward parts of the water. Body mass of G. lecontei males (n 5 10) and females body subjected to assault. At full capacity, the glands store 4.5 (n 5 4) was found to be 156 6 18 mg and 159 6 27 mg, mg of formic acid (3% of body mass), enough for upward of six respectively. ejections. The beetle reloads the glands at a rate of 126 mgof Gland Anatomy. For gross anatomical study of the glands, formic acid per day. For the approximately 500 secretory cells beetles were dissected under saline solution.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of H2O2 on the Lactic and Formic Acid Degradation in Presence of Tio2 Rutile and Anatase Phases Under UV and Visible Light
    catalysts Article Impact of H2O2 on the Lactic and Formic Acid Degradation in Presence of TiO2 Rutile and Anatase Phases under UV and Visible Light Annika Holm 1,2, Marwa Hamandi 1, Karima Sahel 3, Frederic Dappozze 1 and Chantal Guillard 1,* 1 University of Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 2 avenue Albert Einstein, F-69626 Villeurbanne, France; [email protected] (A.H.); [email protected] (M.H.); [email protected] (F.D.) 2 Chemistry Department, Sonoma State University (SSU), 1801 East Cotative Ave, Rohnert Park, CA 94928, USA 3 Laboratoire des Eco-Matériaux Fonctionnels et Nanostructurés, Faculté de Chimie, Département Génie des Matériaux, Université des Sciences et de la Technologie d’Oran (USTO), Bir El Djir 3100, Algeria; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +33-472-445-316 Received: 27 August 2020; Accepted: 21 September 2020; Published: 1 October 2020 Abstract: The degradation rates of formic acid and lactic acid in the presence and absence of H2O2 were studied, utilizing several TiO2 catalysts: PC105 (100% anatase), MPT 625 (100% rutile), and P25 (80% anatase/20% rutile), and the results were discussed with regards to the current literature. The impact of hydrogen peroxide on the photocatalytic efficiency of eleven TiO2 samples was then determined, using commercial anatase structures (PC105, PC500, UV100), commercial mixed anatase/rutile (P25 and P90), and six rutile (two commercial samples: MPT 625 and C-R160, and four home-made rutile samples were synthesized by TiCl4 hydrolysis). The effect of catalyst surface area and TiO2 phase on the degradation rate of lactic acid (LA) and the decomposition of H2O2 was studied and discussed in regard to the active species generated.
    [Show full text]
  • Incompatible Chemical Groups.Pdf
    Incompatible Chemical Hazard Groups (and some common examples) Mineral Acids Do NOT Store with… Hydrochloric acid Hydrogen peroxide Acetone Sulfuric Acid Sodium hydroxide Methanol Phosphoric Acid Calcium hydroxide Nitric Acid (keep separate) Chloroform Acetic Acid Strong Organic Acids Do NOT Store with… Acetic Acid3, 4 Hydrogen peroxide Acetone Acetonitrile Formic Acid Sodium hydroxide Methanol Benzene Sulfuric Acid Chloroform Special 1. Organic acids are varied and may be incompatible with each other. Notes: Check MSDSs for specifics 2. Store nitric acid separately in its own secondary container. It is a strong oxidizer. 3. Store acetic acid away from oxidizing agents — especially nitric acid. 4. Acetic acid may be stored with some inorganic acids and most flammable solvents but keep in a separate secondary container. (>70% acetic acid is combustible). Weak These are typically not corrosive and not strongly reactive and can be Organic Acids stored with general liquid lab chemicals. Examples include butyric, maleic, and benzoic acids. Non-Flammable Do NOT Store with… Chlorinated Solvents Methylene chloride Acetone Hexane Chloroform Methanol Nitric Acid Trichloroethane Ethanol Hydrogen Peroxide Carbon tetrachloride Organic Solvents Do NOT Store with… Acetone Hydrogen peroxide Nitric Acid Methanol Sodium hydroxide Chromic Acid Phenol Calcium hydroxide Sulfuric Acid Xylene Trichlorfluoromethane Hydrochloric Acid Oxidizers Do NOT Store with… Nitric Acid Sodium metal Paper and oily rags Hydrogen peroxide Isopropyl Alcohol Xylene Chromic Acid Acetone Sodium nitrate Perchloric Acid Ethyl ether Bromate salts .
    [Show full text]
  • Anhydrous Formic Acid and Acetic Anhydride As Solvent Or Additive in Non- Aqueous Titrations
    ORIGINAL ARTICLES Department of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry1,Eo¨tvo¨s University, Budapest; Department of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry2, Debrecen University, Debrecen, Hungary Anhydrous formic acid and acetic anhydride as solvent or additive in non- aqueous titrations A´ . Buva´ri-Barcza 1,I.To´th2, L. Barcza1 Received November 21, 2003, accepted October 26, 2004 Dr. A´ gnes Buva´ri-Barcza, Department of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, Eo¨tvo¨s University H-1518 Budapest 112, P.O. Box 32, Hungary [email protected] Pharmazie 60: 650–655 (2005) The use and importance of formic acid and acetic anhydride (Ac2O) is increasing in nonaqueous acid- base titrations, but their interaction with the solutes is poorly understood. This paper attempts to clarify the effect of the solvents; NMR and spectrophotometric investigations were done to reveal the interac- tions between some bases and the mentioned solvents. Anhydrous formic acid is a typical protogenic solvent but both the relative permittivity and acidity are higher than those of acetic acid (mostly used in assays of bases). These differences originate from the different chemical structures: liquid acetic acid contains basically cyclic dimers while formic acid forms linear associates. Ac2O is obviously not an acidic but an aprotic (very slightly protophilic) solvent, which supposedly dissociates slightly into þ À acetyl (CH3CO ) and acetate (AcO ) ions. In fact, some bases react with Ac2O forming an associate: the Acþ group is bound to the dÀ charged atom of the reactant while AcOÀ is associated with the dþ group at appropriate distance. 1. Introduction fects of cis-trans isomerisation (more exactly the forma- tion of cis isomer) of DMAAB could be eliminated.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Effect of Formic Acid and Its Salts on the Gastrointestinal
    animals Review A Review of the Effect of Formic Acid and Its Salts on the Gastrointestinal Microbiota and Performance of Pigs Diana Luise * , Federico Correa , Paolo Bosi and Paolo Trevisi Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences (DISTAL), University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy; [email protected] (F.C.); [email protected] (P.B.); [email protected] (P.T.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 20 April 2020; Accepted: 17 May 2020; Published: 19 May 2020 Simple Summary: Acidifiers, especially formic acid and its salts, have long been used for improving the gastrointestinal health and growth performance of pigs, especially piglets. Although, some biological mechanisms explaining their effects are already known, a lack of consensus is still reported on their effects on the gastrointestinal microbiome. The present review provides an overview and evaluation of the effects of formic acid and its salts on the gastrointestinal microbiota and on the growth performance of pigs. Abstract: Out of the alternatives to antibiotics and zinc oxide, organic acids, or simply acidifiers, play significant roles, especially in ensuring gut health and the growth performance of pigs. Regarding acidifiers, formic acid and its salts have shown very promising results in weaning, growing and finishing pigs. Although it is known that the main mechanisms by which acidifiers can improve livestock performance and health are related to the regulation of gastrointestinal pH, an improvement in intestinal digestibility and mineral utilization, and their antimicrobial properties against specific pathogens has been observed, while poor consensus remains in relation to the effect of acidifers on bacteria and the complex microbiome.
    [Show full text]
  • Amended Safety Assessment of Formic Acid and Sodium Formate As Used in Cosmetics
    Amended Safety Assessment of Formic Acid and Sodium Formate as Used in Cosmetics Status: Tentative Amended Report for Panel Review Release Date: September 23, 2013 Panel Date: December 9-10, 2013 All interested persons are provided 60 days from the above release date to comment on this Safety Assessment and to identify additional published data that should be included or provide unpublished data which can be made public and included. Information may be submitted without identifying the source or the trade name of the cosmetic product containing the ingredient. All unpublished data submitted to CIR will be discussed in open meetings, will be available at the CIR office for review by any interested party and may be cited in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. Please submit data, comments, or requests to the CIR Director, Dr. Lillian J. Gill. The 2013 Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel members are: Chair, Wilma F. Bergfeld, M.D., F.A.C.P.; Donald V. Belsito, M.D.; Curtis D. Klaassen, Ph.D.; Daniel C. Liebler, Ph.D.; Ronald A. Hill, Ph.D. James G. Marks, Jr., M.D.; Ronald C. Shank, Ph.D.; Thomas J. Slaga, Ph.D.; and Paul W. Snyder, D.V.M., Ph.D. The CIR Director is Lillian J. Gill, D.P.A. This report was prepared by Wilbur Johnson, Jr., M.S., Senior Scientific Analyst and Bart Heldreth, Ph.D., Chemist. © Cosmetic Ingredient Review 1101 17TH STREET, NW, SUITE 412 ◊ WASHINGTON, DC 20036-4702 ◊ PH 202.331.0651 ◊ FAX 202.331.0088 ◊ [email protected] Table of Contents INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]