DOCSLIB.ORG

En En Amendments 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs 2021/0227(BUD) 2.8.2021 AMENDMENTS 1 - 54 Draft opinion Domènec Ruiz Devesa (PE695.140v01-00) Draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2022 - General Introduction - Total expenditure - General statement of revenue - Statement of revenue and expenditure by section (2021/0227(BUD)) AM\1237344EN.docx PE696.349v01-00 EN United in diversityEN AM_Com_NonLegOpinion PE696.349v01-00 2/36 AM\1237344EN.docx EN Amendment 1 Peter Kofod Draft opinion Paragraph 1 Draft opinion Amendment 1. Finds the proposed reduction in the 1. Finds the proposed reduction in the budget of the European Union Agency for budget of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) by 0,5 % very Fundamental Rights (FRA) by 0,5 % very disappointing; calls instead for a satisfying; budgetary increase of EUR 27,1 million and for the addition of two temporary agents and two contractual agents to function group IV in the establishment plan to allow FRA to continue to operate effectively; Or. en Amendment 2 Domènec Ruiz Devesa Draft opinion Paragraph 1 Draft opinion Amendment 1. Finds the proposed reduction in the 1. Finds the proposed reduction in the budget of the European Union Agency for budget of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) by 0,5 % very Fundamental Rights (FRA) by 0,5 % very disappointing; calls instead for a budgetary disappointing; calls instead for a budgetary increase of EUR 27,1 million and for the increase of EUR 32,2 million to allow FRA addition of two temporary agents and two to continue to operate effectively, in contractual agents to function group IV particular in the area of emerging in the establishment plan to allow FRA to technologies and artificial intelligence, continue to operate effectively; migration and security as well as social and economic rights and discrimination; calls for the addition of 12 temporary agent and seven contract agent posts; highlights that without the additional financial and staff resources, FRA will not be able to carry out all the tasks assigned to it and fully implement its new mandate; AM\1237344EN.docx 3/36 PE696.349v01-00 EN Or. en Amendment 3 Fabienne Keller, Olivier Chastel, Malik Azmani, Nathalie Loiseau, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Ramona Strugariu, Anna Júlia Donáth Draft opinion Paragraph 1 Draft opinion Amendment 1. Finds the proposed reduction in the 1. Finds the proposed reduction in the budget of the European Union Agency for budget of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) by 0,5 % very Fundamental Rights (FRA) by 0,5 % very disappointing; calls instead for a budgetary disappointing; stresses that the FRA’s increase of EUR 27,1 million and for the tasks of collection and analysis of reliable addition of two temporary agents and two information on fundamental rights contractual agents to function group IV in compliance in the Member States are the establishment plan to allow FRA to expected to increase in the future; calls continue to operate effectively; instead for a budgetary increase of EUR 27,1 million and for the addition of two temporary agents at AD grade and two contractual agents to function group IV in the establishment plan to allow FRA to continue to operate effectively; Or. en Amendment 4 Gwendoline Delbos-Corfield Draft opinion Paragraph 1 Draft opinion Amendment 1. Finds the proposed reduction in the 1. Is extremely concerned about the budget of the European Union Agency for proposed reduction in the budget of the Fundamental Rights (FRA) by 0,5 % very European Union Agency for Fundamental disappointing; calls instead for a budgetary Rights (FRA) by 0,5 %; calls instead for a increase of EUR 27,1 million and for the budgetary increase of EUR 29,6 million in addition of two temporary agents and two order to effectively implement the new contractual agents to function group IV in mandate and the projects that respond to the establishment plan to allow FRA to identified needs, as well as to compensate continue to operate effectively; the considerable extra efforts required to monitor the impact of fundamental rights PE696.349v01-00 4/36 AM\1237344EN.docx EN during the COVID-19 pandemic; deplores the fact that the budget for FRA has barely increased in the last years, and underlines that this can affect the quality of work that the Agency provides, which has proved to be extremely valuable for the Union policy; further calls for the addition of ten temporary agents and five contractual agents to function group IV in the establishment plan; highlights that without adequate financial and staff resources, FRA will not be able to carry out all the tasks assigned to it and fully implement its new mandate; Or. en Amendment 5 Clare Daly Draft opinion Paragraph 1 Draft opinion Amendment 1. Finds the proposed reduction in the 1. Is deeply disappointed by the budget of the European Union Agency for proposed reduction in the budget of the Fundamental Rights (FRA) by 0,5 % very European Union Agency for Fundamental disappointing; calls instead for a budgetary Rights (FRA), particularly given the increase of EUR 27,1 million and for the annual budget of the agency has not addition of two temporary agents and two increased since 2013 while the budgets of contractual agents to function group IV in other agencies such as Frontex have seen the establishment plan to allow FRA to step increases; calls instead for a continue to operate effectively; budgetary increase to EUR 30 million and for the addition of six temporary agents and two contractual agents to function group IV in the establishment plan to allow FRA to continue to operate effectively; Or. en Amendment 6 Peter Kofod Draft opinion Paragraph 2 AM\1237344EN.docx 5/36 PE696.349v01-00 EN Draft opinion Amendment 2. Welcomes the proposed increase of 2. Notes with concern the proposed the budget of the European Asylum increase of the budget of the European Support Office by 11,2 %; calls for Asylum Support Office by 11,2 %; calls adjustments to the establishment plan as for adjustments to the establishment plan regards the distribution of posts across as regards the distribution of posts across different grades to enable reclassification different grades to enable reclassification needs and for the publication of planned needs and for the publication of planned posts for 2022; emphasises that the latter posts for 2022; emphasises that the latter will not impact the total budget or the total will not impact the total budget or the total number of staff proposed; number of staff proposed; Or. en Amendment 7 Domènec Ruiz Devesa Draft opinion Paragraph 2 Draft opinion Amendment 2. Welcomes the proposed increase of 2. Welcomes the proposed increase of the budget of the European Asylum the budget of the European Asylum Support Office by 11,2 %; calls for Support Office by 11,2 %; calls for adjustments to the establishment plan as adjustments to the establishment plan as regards the distribution of posts across regards the distribution of posts across different grades to enable reclassification different grades to enable reclassification needs and for the publication of planned needs and for the publication of planned posts for 2022; emphasises that the latter posts for 2022; emphasises that the latter will not impact the total budget or the total will not impact the total budget or the total number of staff proposed; number of staff proposed; requests in addition 28 additional posts, and the related budget, in order to implement new activities in 2022 stemming from the new mandate of European Union Agency for Asylum; Or. en Amendment 8 Fabienne Keller, Olivier Chastel, Malik Azmani, Nathalie Loiseau, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Ramona Strugariu, Anna Júlia Donáth PE696.349v01-00 6/36 AM\1237344EN.docx EN Draft opinion Paragraph 2 Draft opinion Amendment 2. Welcomes the proposed increase of 2. Welcomes the proposed increase of the budget of the European Asylum the budget of the European Asylum Support Office by 11,2 %; calls for Support Office (EASO) by 11,2 %; adjustments to the establishment plan as considers that the continuous challenge of regards the distribution of posts across migration and asylum management calls different grades to enable reclassification for strong support from the agency to needs and for the publication of planned strengthen the implementation of the a posts for 2022; emphasises that the latter Common European Asylum System will not impact the total budget or the total (CEAS), enhance practical cooperation, number of staff proposed; provide operational and technical assistance and stimulate information exchange as well as convergence in the assessment of protection needs between the Member States; stresses that the interinstitutional agreement reached on June 29th 2021 on the transformation of EASO into the European Union Asylum Agency (EUAA) requires additional human resources which were not foreseen in the Commission’s draft budget; underlines in particular the need to recruit from 2022 new staff at AD and AST positions for the function of Fundamental Rights Officer, the Asylum Support Teams, the Liaison Officers in Member States or to strengthen legal and training teams; also calls for adjustments to the establishment plan as regards the distribution of posts across different grades to enable reclassification needs and for the publication of planned posts for 2022; emphasises that the latter will not impact the total budget or the total number of staff proposed, set aside the additional staff required for the implementation of the EUAA; Or. en Amendment 9 Gwendoline Delbos-Corfield Draft opinion AM\1237344EN.docx 7/36 PE696.349v01-00 EN Paragraph 2 Draft opinion Amendment 2. Welcomes the proposed increase of 2.
Recommended publications
  • Postbus 60 2501 CB Den Haag 06

    Postbus 60 2501 CB Den Haag 06

    Postbus 60 06 - 16 27 04 35 IBAN: NL51ABNA0491044100 KvK: 58053174 2501 CB Den Haag www.prinsjesfestival.nl BTW nummer: 852851972B01 ANBI: 852851972 Prinsjesfestival 2016 | beeldverslag Prinsjesfestival viert het feest van de democratie. Na een korte aanloop omlijst- te Prinsjesfestival van donderdag 15 tot en met dinsdag 20 september 2016 voor de vierde maal Prinsjesdag. Prinsjesfestival is een moderne traditie die in Den Haag een betekenisvol programma biedt vol feestelijke en inhoudelijke activiteiten. Ditmaal was de provincie Zeeland strategisch partner van dit festi- val voor stad en land. Het centrale thema van Prinsjesfestival 2016 was: Democr@tie: tussen Facebook en Wetboek Over democratie en de digitale revolutie Dit beeldverslag bevat een deel van de activiteiten onder de vlag van Prinsjes- festival. Zie achterin voor het volledig overzicht van het programma, de samen- stelling van diverse gremia, een greep uit de pers, de tekst waarmee Prinsjes- dichter Franca Treur Prinsjesfestival 2016 opende, het menu voor PrinsjesDiner 2016 van Prinsjeskok Eric van Bochove. Eerste en laatste pagina beeldverslag: voor- en achterkant Festivalkrant Prinsjesfestival 2016. Postbus 60 06 - 16 27 04 35 IBAN: NL51ABNA0491044100 KvK: 58053174 2501 CB Den Haag www.prinsjesfestival.nl BTW nummer: 852851972B01 ANBI: 852851972 VRIJDAG 09.09.2016 | 20.00 | Nacht van de dictatuur ProDemos | ProDemos, Gevangenpoort. Postbus 60 06 - 16 27 04 35 IBAN: NL51ABNA0491044100 KvK: 58053174 2501 CB Den Haag www.prinsjesfestival.nl BTW nummer: 852851972B01 ANBI: 852851972 ZATERDAG 10.09.2016 (Dag van de democratie in Nederland, open monumentendag) | 10.00 – 16.30 | PrinsjesFototentoonstelling 2016 | Noenzaal Eerste Kamer | in samenwerking met Eerste Kamer der Staten-Generaal, Rabobank Nederland.
  • European Culture: Identity and Diversity

    European Culture: Identity and Diversity

    European Culture: Identity and Diversity Colloquy of the Council of Europe in cooperation with the French Minister of Culture and Communication and the City of Strasbourg Summary Strasbourg, 8 – 9 September 2005 Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art European Culture: Identity and Diversity Colloquy of the Council of Europe in cooperation with the French Minister of Culture and Communication and the City of Strasbourg Summary Strasbourg, 8 – 9 September 2005 Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art Provisional version Council of Europe Directorate General IV – Education, Culture and Heritage, Youth and Sport 67075 Strasbourg Cedex France Tel. +33 388 41 20 00 Fax +33 388 41 27 50 www.coe.int October 2005 4 Contents Introduction...............................................................................................................................7 Programme...............................................................................................................................9 Opening session.....................................................................................................................11 Mr. Terry Davis, Secretary General of the Council of Europe ............................................................................. 11 Mr. Benoît Paumier, French Ministry of Culture and Communication ................................................................. 13 Mrs. Fabienne Keller, Mayor of Strasbourg ......................................................................................................... 15
  • COMMON STATEMENT on the US-EU WINE TRADE RELATIONSHIP June 14, 2021

    COMMON STATEMENT on the US-EU WINE TRADE RELATIONSHIP June 14, 2021

    COMMON STATEMENT ON THE US-EU WINE TRADE RELATIONSHIP June 14, 2021 The EU and the US wine sectors play a critical role in supporting a vibrant transatlantic trade relationship. This sector is an essential driving force for many rural economies and for a significant number of medium and small enterprises. The undersigned deeply regret that the wine sector, as a notable industry in our two economies is sometimes caught in the crosshairs of unrelated trade disputes, causing economic damage to producers, and putting the millions of jobs that they support at risk. Consumers are also victims of those trading conflicts, which can lead to higher prices and reduced consumer choice. We urge the European Union and the US to resolve current trade disputes, to stop any related retaliatory action against wine exports, and to strengthen their bilateral partnership in order to avoid any sanctions against those sectors, including in the context of the current World Trade Organization Large Civil Aircraft Airbus-Boeing disputes. As legislators and policy makers on both sides of the Atlantic, we acknowledge the importance and benefits of strengthening this bilateral partnership. Both the U.S. and the EU are each other’s largest export markets, with the total wine trade reaching more than $5.3 billion (€4.5 billion) annually, creating jobs and investment and supporting sustainable agriculture on both sides of the Atlantic. We ask our governments to further support the economic vitality and diversity of our wine sectors by working to remove all tariffs on wine to achieve a “zero for zero” wine trade environment.
  • (2014) PV 01 Add 2 Rev / Minutes

    (2014) PV 01 Add 2 Rev / Minutes

    Declassified (∗∗∗) AS/Soc (2014) PV 01add 2rev 11 April 2014 Asocpv01add2rev_2014 Committee on Social Affairs, Health and Sustainable Development Minutes of the hearing of experts on the circumcision of young boys (following the adoption of Resolution 1952 (2013) and Recommendation 2023 (2013) on “Children’s right to physical integrity” in October 2013) held in Strasbourg on Tuesday, 28 January 2014, from 2 pm to 3.30 pm Preliminary remark: At a side-event prior to the hearing, two documentary films on religious circumcisions were shown (and are regularly referred to in the minutes below): - The film “It’s a Boy” by the British film producer Victor Schonfeld, presenting a critical view of religious circumcision; - A documentary film entitled “For life”, specially produced for this occasion by the Israeli Knesset delegation, observer to the Assembly, represented by Mr Nachmann Shai, Chairperson of the observer delegation. The newly elected Chairperson, Mr Valeriu Ghiletchi (elected in the Committee meeting held in the morning of the same day), opened the meeting, welcomed all participants and recalled the objective of the hearing: to give the floor to various stakeholders wishing to publically present their views on the issue that had provoked controversial debate after the adoption of the texts on Children’s right to physical integrity by the Parliamentary Assembly, i.e. the issue of circumcision of young boys which is not medically justified. The Chairperson reminded the audience that the Parliamentary Assembly remained very much attached to the freedom of religion as stated on different occasions in recent years, and that Resolution 1952 (2013) had never called for a ban of religious circumcision.
  • Parliamentary Dimension Dutch EU Presidency

    Parliamentary Dimension Dutch EU Presidency

    Parliamentary dimension Dutch EU Presidency 1 January - 1 July 2016 Index parliamentary dimension dutch eu presidency Index Reflection During the first six months of 2016, it was the Netherlands' turn to assume the Presidency of Meeting of the 3 the Council of the European Union. Throughout this period the Dutch government was Chairpersons of COSAC responsible for efficiently guiding the Council negotiations. But the Dutch Presidency also had a 'parliamentary dimension' to it. This entailed that the Dutch House of Representatives and the Senate organised six conferences for fellow parliamentarians from EU member states. Stability, economic 5 coordination and governance The aim of these conferences was to encourage parliamentarians to work together towards a stronger parliamentary engagement in European decision-making. Particularly now that many important decisions are made at a European level, effective parliamentary scrutiny plays a Innovative & Inspiring 7 major role. And that is why it is essential that national parliaments and the European Parlia- ment join forces and work together. It was in this spirit that, during the six months of the Dutch Presidency, the House of Representatives and the Senate made it their goal to encourage cooperation between parliamentarians and so increase their joint effectiveness. Human trafficking in 8 the digital age This e-zine reflects on the parliamentary dimension of the Dutch EU Presidency and shows the highlights of the six interparliamentary conferences organised by the Dutch parliament on such themes as security and defence, economic and budgetary policy, energy and human trafficking. Energy, innovation and 11 circular economy It also features the special focuses that the Dutch parliament placed on the content and organisation of the meetings.
  • To the President of the European Commission Mrs. Ursula Von Der Leyen, Rue De La Loi / Wetstraat 200 1049 Brussels

    To the President of the European Commission Mrs. Ursula Von Der Leyen, Rue De La Loi / Wetstraat 200 1049 Brussels

    To the President of the European Commission Mrs. Ursula von der Leyen, Rue de la Loi / Wetstraat 200 1049 Brussels To the Executive Vice-President of the European Commission Mr. Vladis Dombrovskis Rue de la Loi / Wetstraat 200 1049 Brussels Brussels, 22 October 2020, Subject: the EU must impose an import ban on Chinese companies using forced labour Dear President von der Leyen, Dear Vice-President Dombrovskis, For years, the Chinese regime has been detaining millions of human beings in camps, just because they were born Uyghurs. For years, Europe and the world have been witnessing a crime against humanity without opposing any resistance to it. In recent months, several studies have reported the use of Uyghur forced labour for the benefit of major European companies. Indeed, many Chinese factories, directly supplying EU brands exploit the Uyghurs and benefit from their forced labour. Facing this abjection, Europe must act to protect the lives and fundamental rights of Uyghurs. The EU should use its trade and market power to safeguards the founding principles enrichened in our Treaties and guiding our external policies. As the US did lately through an imports ban passed almost unanimously in the US House of Representatives, Europe urgently needs to establish a blacklist of Chinese companies implicated in Uyghur forced labour. We look forward to your response. Yours sincerely, 1. Raphaël Glucksmann, S&D 2. Dietmar Köster, S&D 3. Francisco Guerreiro, Greens 4. Sylvie Guillaume, S&D 5. Aurore Lalucq, S&D 6. Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Renew 7. Anna Cavazzini, Greens 8. Nora Mebarek, S&D 9.
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast

    European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast

    Briefing May 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 6 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 5 seats 1 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener Karin Feldinger 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Petra Steger Monika Vana* Stefan Windberger 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath Roman Haider Thomas Waitz* Stefan Zotti 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide Vesna Schuster Olga Voglauer Nini Tsiklauri 6. Wolfram Pirchner Julia Elisabeth Herr Elisabeth Dieringer-Granza Thomas Schobesberger Johannes Margreiter 7. Christian Sagartz Christian Alexander Dax Josef Graf Teresa Reiter 8. Barbara Thaler Stefanie Mösl Maximilian Kurz Isak Schneider 9. Christian Zoll Luca Peter Marco Kaiser Andrea Kerbleder Peter Berry 10. Claudia Wolf-Schöffmann Theresa Muigg Karin Berger Julia Reichenhauser NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. Likely to be elected Unlikely to be elected or *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. and/or take seat to take seat, if elected European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Paul Magnette 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 2. Maria Arena* 2.
  • 1. Debbie Abrahams, Labour Party, United Kingdom 2

    1. Debbie Abrahams, Labour Party, United Kingdom 2

    1. Debbie Abrahams, Labour Party, United Kingdom 2. Malik Ben Achour, PS, Belgium 3. Tina Acketoft, Liberal Party, Sweden 4. Senator Fatima Ahallouch, PS, Belgium 5. Lord Nazir Ahmed, Non-affiliated, United Kingdom 6. Senator Alberto Airola, M5S, Italy 7. Hussein al-Taee, Social Democratic Party, Finland 8. Éric Alauzet, La République en Marche, France 9. Patricia Blanquer Alcaraz, Socialist Party, Spain 10. Lord John Alderdice, Liberal Democrats, United Kingdom 11. Felipe Jesús Sicilia Alférez, Socialist Party, Spain 12. Senator Alessandro Alfieri, PD, Italy 13. François Alfonsi, Greens/EFA, European Parliament (France) 14. Amira Mohamed Ali, Chairperson of the Parliamentary Group, Die Linke, Germany 15. Rushanara Ali, Labour Party, United Kingdom 16. Tahir Ali, Labour Party, United Kingdom 17. Mahir Alkaya, Spokesperson for Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation, Socialist Party, the Netherlands 18. Senator Josefina Bueno Alonso, Socialist Party, Spain 19. Lord David Alton of Liverpool, Crossbench, United Kingdom 20. Patxi López Álvarez, Socialist Party, Spain 21. Nacho Sánchez Amor, S&D, European Parliament (Spain) 22. Luise Amtsberg, Green Party, Germany 23. Senator Bert Anciaux, sp.a, Belgium 24. Rt Hon Michael Ancram, the Marquess of Lothian, Former Chairman of the Conservative Party, Conservative Party, United Kingdom 25. Karin Andersen, Socialist Left Party, Norway 26. Kirsten Normann Andersen, Socialist People’s Party (SF), Denmark 27. Theresa Berg Andersen, Socialist People’s Party (SF), Denmark 28. Rasmus Andresen, Greens/EFA, European Parliament (Germany) 29. Lord David Anderson of Ipswich QC, Crossbench, United Kingdom 30. Barry Andrews, Renew Europe, European Parliament (Ireland) 31. Chris Andrews, Sinn Féin, Ireland 32. Eric Andrieu, S&D, European Parliament (France) 33.
  • Members of the European Parliament Mr Janusz

    Members of the European Parliament Mr Janusz

    Members of the European Parliament Mr Janusz Wojciechowski Commissioner for Agriculture European Commission Rue de la Loi 200 B-1049 Bruxelles Mr Virginijus Sinkevičius Commissioner for Environment, Oceans and Fisheries European Commission Rue de la Loi 200 B-1049 Bruxelles Brussels, 11 November 2020 Subject: Deforestation and illegal logging of Romania’s primary forests Dear Commissioners, we, the undersigned Members of the European Parliament, are addressing you to express our deep concerns about massive violations of the protection of Natura 2000 areas, primary and ancient forests and UNESCO World Heritage Sites in Romania. In Romania, deforestation caused by illegal logging is continuing on an alarming scale. It threatens the last and irreplaceable primary forests in the EU, which are more crucial than ever in the fight against climate change and for the preservation of biodiversity. According to expert estimates, up to two thirds of the EU’s remaining primary forests are located in Romania. Largely untouched areas in the Romanian Carpathian Mountains and the Făgăraș Mountains have survived until today – a European if not global heritage of invaluable ecological value. Some of these forests are also included in the List of World Heritage Sites UNESCO.1 Now, ruthless greed and large-scale corruption are seriously endangering these European natural treasures and the time for protective measures is running out. If no immediate action is taken, the still existing forests will soon be lost forever. Since the launch of the European Commission’s infringement procedure against Romania on 12 February 2020 for failing to establish effective measures against illegal logging2, thousands more hectares were destroyed.
  • Green Recovery Call to Action & Signatories 121

    Green Recovery Call to Action & Signatories 121

    GREENRECOVERY REBOOT & REBOOST our economies for a sustainable future Call for mobilisation The coronavirus crisis is shaking the whole world, with devastating consequences across Europe. We are being put to the test. We are suffering and mourning our losses, and this crisis is testing the limits of our system. It is also a test of our great European solidarity and of our institutions, which acted fast at the start of the crisis to deploy measures to protect us. The crisis is still ongoing, but we will see the light at the end of the tunnel, and by fighting together, we will beat the virus. Never have we faced such a challenging situation in peacetime. The fight against the pandemic is our top priority and everything that is needed to stop it and eradicate the virus must be done. We welcome and strongly support all the actions developed by governments, EU institutions, local authorities, scientists, medical staff, volunteers, citizens and economic actors. In this tremendously difficult situation, we are also facing another crisis: a shock to our economy tougher than the 2008 crisis. The major shock to the economy and workers created by the pandemic calls for a strong coordinated economic response. We therefore welcome the declaration of European leaders stating that they will do “whatever it takes” to tackle the social and economic consequences of this crisis. However, what worked for the 2008 financial crisis may not be sufficient to overcome this one. The economic recovery will only come with massive investments to protect and create jobs and to support all the companies, regions and sectors that have suffered from the economy coming to a sudden halt.
  • European Alliance for a Green Recovery

    European Alliance for a Green Recovery

    Launch of the European alliance for a Green Recovery Press Release Under embargo until 14/04 7:00am At the initiative of Pascal Canfin, Chair of the Environment Committee at the European Parliament, 180 political decision-makers, business leaders, trade unions, NGOs, and think tanks have come together to form a European alliance for a Green Recovery. In the face of the coronavirus crisis, the biggest challenge Europe has faced in peacetime, with devastating consequences and a shock to the economy tougher than the 2008 crisis, Ministers from 11 countries, 79 cross-party MEPs from 17 Member States, 37 CEOs, 28 business associations representing 10 different sectors, trade union confederation representing members from 90 national trade union organisations and 10 trade union federations, 7 NGOs and 6 think tanks, have committed to working together to create, support and implement solutions to prepare our economies for the world of tomorrow. This first pan-European call for mobilisation on post-crisis green investment packages will work to build the recovery and transformation plans which enshrine the fight against climate change and biodiversity as a key pillar of the economic strategy. Sharing the belief that the economic recovery will only come with massive investments to protect and create jobs and to support all companies, regions and sectors that have suffered from the economy coming to a sudden halt, the alliance commits to contribute to the post-crisis investment decisions needed to reboot and reboost our economy. Covid-19 will not make climate change and nature degradation go away. The fight against this crisis will not be won without a solid economic response.
  • WQ3 Mass Arrests of LGBTI Activists in Poland .Pdf

    WQ3 Mass Arrests of LGBTI Activists in Poland .Pdf

    Question for written answer E-004735/2020 to the Commission Rule 138 Pierre Karleskind (Renew), Sophia in 't Veld (Renew), Fredrick Federley (Renew), Karen Melchior (Renew), Nicolae Ştefănuță (Renew), Moritz Körner (Renew), Maite Pagazaurtundúa (Renew), Samira Rafaela (Renew), Radka Maxová (Renew), Liesje Schreinemacher (Renew), Abir Al-Sahlani (Renew), Anna Júlia Donáth (Renew), Irène Tolleret (Renew), Sylwia Spurek (Verts/ALE), Tanja Fajon (S&D), Anne-Sophie Pelletier (GUE/NGL), Isabel Carvalhais (S&D), Monika Vana (Verts/ALE), Cornelia Ernst (GUE/NGL), Olivier Chastel (Renew), Gabriele Bischoff (S&D), Delara Burkhardt (S&D), Miapetra Kumpula-Natri (S&D), Chrysoula Zacharopoulou (Renew), Grace O'Sullivan (Verts/ALE), Gwendoline Delbos-Corfield (Verts/ALE), Eleonora Evi (NI), Dimitrios Papadimoulis (GUE/NGL), Hilde Vautmans (Renew), Maria Arena (S&D), Francisco Guerreiro (Verts/ALE), Arba Kokalari (PPE), Pascal Durand (Renew), Nathalie Loiseau (Renew), Catherine Chabaud (Renew), Ilana Cicurel (Renew), Evelyne Gebhardt (S&D), Laurence Farreng (Renew), Mauri Pekkarinen (Renew), Billy Kelleher (Renew), Andrus Ansip (Renew), Irena Joveva (Renew), Sandro Gozi (Renew), Asger Christensen (Renew), Martin Hojsík (Renew), María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos (Renew), Klemen Grošelj (Renew), Stéphane Bijoux (Renew), José Ramón Bauzá Díaz (Renew), Stéphane Séjourné (Renew), Svenja Hahn (Renew), Marianne Vind (S&D), Katalin Cseh (Renew), Stéphanie Yon-Courtin (Renew), Magdalena Adamowicz (PPE), Marie-Pierre Vedrenne (Renew), Henna Virkkunen (PPE), Jan- Christoph Oetjen (Renew), Claudia Gamon (Renew), Aurore Lalucq (S&D), Birgit Sippel (S&D), Ramona Strugariu (Renew), Isabel Santos (S&D), Valérie Hayer (Renew), Marisa Matias (GUE/NGL), Maria Walsh (PPE), Kathleen Van Brempt (S&D), Linea Søgaard-Lidell (Renew), Mario Furore (NI), Clara Aguilera (S&D), Alice Kuhnke (Verts/ALE), Pär Holmgren (Verts/ALE), Jakop G.