DOCSLIB.ORG

Sonoma County California

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sonoma County California County of Sonoma, California FINAL BUDGET 2006 - 2007 SONOMA COUNTY MISSION Final Budget 2006-2007 and Statistical Report 2005-2006 2004-2005 SUPERVISOR VALERIE BROWN FIRST DISTRICT SUPERVISOR MIKE KERNS SECOND DISTRICT SUPERVISOR TIM SMITH THIRD DISTRICT SUPERVISOR PAUL L. KELLEY, CHAIR FOURTH DISTRICT SUPERVISOR MIKE REILLY FIFTH DISTRICT RECOMMENDED BY BOB DEIS, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR COMPILED BY RODNEY DOLE, AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Cover Photo: Riverfront Regional Park Sonoma County, California Provided by Sonoma County Regional Parks GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION Distinguished Budget Presentation Award PRESENTED TO Sonoma County California For the Fiscal Year Beginning July 1, 2005 President Executive Director The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) presented a Distinguished Budget Presentation Award to Sonoma County, California for its annual budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2005. In order to receive this award, a governmental unit must publish a budget document that meets program criteria as a policy document, as an operations guide, as a financial plan, and as a communications device. This award is valid for a period of one year only. We believe our current budget continues to conform to program requirements, and we are submitting it to GFOA to determine its eligibility for another award. COUNTY OF SONOMA FINAL BUDGET 2006 - 2007 Need Help? See A Guide to Reading the Budget TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Page County Overview Development Services Board of Supervisors' Letter to 1 Permit & Resource Management 145 Sonoma County Citizens Community Development Commission 150 County Administrator’s Transmittal Letter 3 Emergency Services 157 A Guide to Reading the Final Budget 17 Transportation and Public Works 162 Financial Policies for Budget Development 20 Water Agency 171 Sonoma County Supervisorial Districts 27 Economic Development Department 179 County Overview & Demographics 28 Regional Parks 182 Directory of Elective & Appointed Officers 36 Organization Chart 38 Other County Services Financial Summaries Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation 191 & Open Space District Introduction 39 Agricultural Commissioner 196 Financing Sources & Uses Summary 40 U.C. Cooperative Extension 200 Final Budget By Function 41 Library 203 County General Fund Summaries 43 Fairgrounds 207 Advertising 209 Administrative Support & Fiscal Services Capital Projects County Administrator 51 County Counsel 52 Capital Projects 215 Human Resources 57 General Services 60 Debt Information Systems 65 Non-Departmental 70 Debt Obligations 241 Auditor-Controller 74 Debt Margin 245 Treasurer/Tax Collector 77 County Clerk-Recorder-Assessor-PA 80 State Financial Schedules Justice Services Introduction 247 Summary of County Budget 249 Court Support Services & Grand Jury 87 Analysis of Fund Balance 250 Probation 90 Schedules 1-8A & 13-15 District Attorney 95 Cross Reference of County Services to 286 Public Defender 100 State Function Categories Sheriff 103 Position Listing Health & Human Services Position Listing 287 General Fund Health Financing 115 Position Allocation Detail 288 Health Services 117 Salary Schedule 328 Human Services 129 IHSS Public Authority 136 Glossary Child Support Services 138 Glossary of Budget Terms 335 Hospital Enterprise Closeout 141 Index 343 OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR COUNTY OF SONOMA BOB DEIS COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR 575 ADMINISTRATION DRIVE – ROOM 104A SANTA ROSA, CALIFORNIA 95403-2888 JIM ANDERSEN ASST. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TELEPHONE (707) 565-2431 FAX (707) 565-3778 JENNIFER M. MURRAY DEP. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR CHRIS THOMAS DEP. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR June 20, 2006 TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Bob Deis County Administrator SUBJECT: Proposed Fiscal Year (FY) 2006-2007 Budget Submitted for your consideration is the County Administrator’s Proposed Budget for FY 06-07, totaling $1.1 billion. Approval of this budget by your Board will make it available to the public as an appropriate source of information regarding issues proposed for consideration during final budget hearings. This action will also provide appropriations for normal maintenance and operating expenses until the adoption of a Final Budget. The State Budget Act requires the Board of Supervisors to approve a Proposed Budget no later than July 20 and to adopt a Final Budget no later than October 2. This memorandum provides a summary of: 1) the issues, initiatives, and current year accomplishments you will see in the departmental budgets; 2) the overview of the County economy and assumptions used in preparing the budget, including your direction during the Budget Policy Workshop; 3) the status of the State Budget and some of the potential impacts from the current proposals; 4) a list of other emerging issues that are not yet reflected in the Proposed Budget; and 5) a series of recommended actions for your consideration. I. KEY BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 06-07 For at least the last five years, the County has not been able to fully fund “baseline” services and programs with ongoing revenues that we know about at this time, and this trend continues into FY 06-07. This is a result of significant increases in the costs of doing business driven over time by health insurance, retirement, worker’s compensation insurance, materials, and energy, while available on-going resources grow at a much slower rate. In many cases these costs account for all of the increases in a department’s budget. This situation is exacerbated by cost shifts for technology, infrastructure, administration, and regulation by the state and federal governments as they continue to divest themselves of responsibility for programs the County is obligated to operate on their behalf. As just one example, various state agencies are making the unilateral decision to transition their information systems from in-County hardware or software, thereby causing the County to pickup the fixed costs at a formerly shared system or IT platform. We expect these trends will continue into the foreseeable future. Again, “baseline” services represent the service levels or staffing levels of the previous year rolled forward to the next year, whereas demands for service have generally increased as opposed to remaining constant or declining. When looking at any one year by itself, the incremental change or shortfall has been relatively small, but the cumulative effect of cutting baseline budgets over the years is getting increasingly difficult to manage and still provide meaningful services in all areas. If this trend continues it will be more problematic in the future. Unless we see a slowing of the increases related to the cost-of- doing business or a dramatic increase in revenues, the choices will become ever more difficult. Some key examples in this budget where difficult choices were made include the Sheriff, District Attorney, Health Services, Human Services, Child Support Services, Public Defender, Transportation and Public Works, Agriculture Commissioner, and Parks where staffing, maintenance, and other services were reduced to meet available resources. In some cases, this represents the fifth year in a row where reductions have been made and cumulative effects of up to 20% reduction in staffing have been seen. Strategic Planning To address this trend, the Board authorized, and the County has embarked upon, a Strategic Planning effort to help define what kind of community and organizational service system we desire in the long- term, vis-à-vis what kind of service systems we have now and will likely have in the future given status quo assumptions. This effort has focused on four areas for development of potential initiatives: 1) Setting priorities, resource development, and performance measurement; 2) Demographic trends and service delivery implications; 3) Infrastructure and carrying capacity; and 4) Jurisdictional roles and relationships. As we go to print, the analysis to define trends, needs, and potential options is being completed. The next step, evaluating options and developing strategic initiative plans, will continue this summer/fall and begin to generate guidance for the next (FY 07-08) budget. In the meantime, our budget document itself is changing. The goal is to provide a more concise and reader-friendly presentation of the operating plan that the Board adopts each year, which reflects the policy direction and priorities for allocating the resources among the service needs in the community. This will be a multi-year project to coincide with the Strategic Planning effort above, and will more clearly align the information so that the public can see the plans and progress we make on the policy goals of the Board, rather than an extreme focus on minute changes in the budget numbers. In addition, in this document you will read about initiatives that are already underway such as: Reorganizing and Consolidating Since the mid 1990’s, the Board has directed staff to identify options to reorganize the functions of the County in order to provide services more effectively and to reduce costs. In FY 05-06, the latest of these consolidations was approved, merging the elected offices of the Auditor-Controller and the Treasurer-Tax Collector into one elected office for fiscal administration. The transition to the consolidated office is underway and various actions will take place throughout the coming year to provide one-stop direct fiscal services to constituents and free up administrative resources to allow for enhancement of other priority services. Since this
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Climate Change Assessment of Tolay Creek Restoration, San Pablo Bay
    An Elevation and Climate Change Assessment of the Tolay Creek Restoration, San Pablo Bay National Wildlife Refuge U. S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center Data Summary Report Prepared for the California Landscape Conservation Cooperative and U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Refuges John Y. Takekawa, Karen M. Thorne, Kevin J. Buffington, and Chase M. Freeman Tolay Creek Restoration i An Elevation and Climate Change Assessment of the Tolay Creek Restoration, San Pablo Bay National Wildlife Refuge U.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center Data Summary Report Prepared for California Landscape Conservation Cooperative and U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Refuges John Y. Takekawa, Karen M. Thorne, Kevin J. Buffington, and Chase M. Freeman 1 U.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, San Francisco Bay Estuary Field Station, 505 Azuar Drive Vallejo, CA 94592 USA 2 U.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, 3020 State University Dr. East, Modoc Hall Suite 2007, Sacramento, CA 95819 USA For more information contact: John Y. Takekawa, PhD Karen M. Thorne, PhD U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Western Ecological Research Center Western Ecological Research Center 505 Azuar Dr. 3020 State University Dr. East Vallejo, CA 94592 Modoc Hall, Suite 2007 Tel: (707) 562-2000 Sacramento, CA 95819 [email protected] Tel: (916)-278-9417 [email protected] Suggested Citation: Takekawa, J. Y., K. M. Thorne, K. J. Buffington, and C. M. Freeman. 2014. An elevation and climate change assessment of the Tolay Creek restoration, San Pablo Bay National Wildlife Refuge. Unpublished Data Summary Report. U. S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Vallejo, CA.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Sonoma County Stormwater Resources Plan Evaluation Process
    Appendix A List of Stakeholders Engaged APPENDIX A List of Stakeholders Engaged Specific audiences engaged in the planning process are identified below. These audiences include: cities, government officials, landowners, public land managers, locally regulated commercial, agricultural and industrial stakeholders, non-governmental organizations, mosquito and vector control districts and the general public. TABLE 1 LIST OF STAKEHOLDERS ENGAGED Organization Type Watershed 1st District Supervisor Government Sonoma 5th District Supervisor Government Petaluma City of Petaluma Government Petaluma City of Sonoma Government Sonoma Daily Acts Non-Governmental Petaluma Friends of the Petaluma River Non-Governmental Petaluma Zone 2A Petaluma River Watershed- Flood Control Government Petaluma Advisory Committee Zone 3A Valley of the Moon - Flood Control Advisory Government Sonoma Committee Marin Sonoma Mosquito & Vector Control District Special District Both Sonoma Ecology Center Non-Governmental Sonoma Sonoma County Regional Parks Government Both Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and Open Government Both Space District Sonoma Land Trust Non-Governmental Both Sonoma County Transportation and Public Works Government Both Valley of the Moon Water District Government Sonoma Sonoma Resource Conservation District Special District Both Sonoma County Permit Sonoma Government Both Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Non-Governmental N/A California State Parks Government Both California State Water Resources Control Board Government N/A Southern Sonoma
    [Show full text]
  • Tidewater Park Trail, Oakland, CA LWCF Funding Assistance: $183,000
    Land and Water Conservation Fund National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Tidewater Park Trail, Oakland, CA LWCF Funding Assistance: $183,000 Completing the Bay Trail in Oakland Located near the Oakland International Airport and part of the Martin Luther King, Jr. Regional Shoreline, Tidewater Park is a significant shoreline access point and open space along the Alameda waterfront, fea- turing spectacular views of San Leandro Bay. Recent Land and Water Conservation Fund improvements include completion of about half a mile of the multi-use San Francisco Bay Trail, restrooms, 1.4 acres of turf with trees and irrigation and picnic areas. “The Oakland waterfront and the Bay Trail are recreational resources for the entire Bay Area and serve a greater- than-local population, while providing Oakland residents with a new recre- ational resource.” California Coastal Conservancy www.nps.gov/lwcf Land and Water Conservation Fund National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Tolay Lake Acquisition, Sonoma County, CA LWCF Funding Assistance: $202,980 Protecting Sonoma Baylands for a New Regional Park “County officials have learned through bitter experience that park sites are The proposed Tolay Lake Regional Park, a project of Sonoma County, is an effort hard to find…. Which means the time is to provide hiking, horseback riding, bird- now. This rare opportunity needs to be watching, picnicking and other recreation embraced so that 10 years or 100 years activities while protecting pristine farm from now, people will be able to stand and grasslands, critical habitat for threat- on that ridge and be inspired by what ened and endangered species, significant they see.” prehistoric and archaeological sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Parks for All” Measure M Citizens Oversight Committee and File the “Parks for All” Measure M Annual Report 2019-2020
    City of Sonoma Agenda Item Summary Meeting: City Council - 17 Feb 2021 Department Staff Contact Administration Colleen Ferguson, PW Director/City Engineer Lisa Janson, Senior Management Analyst Agenda Item Title Receive Findings and Conclusions of the “Parks for All” Measure M Citizens Oversight Committee and File the “Parks for All” Measure M Annual Report 2019-2020 Summary The purpose of this item is for the Sonoma City Council to receive the findings and conclusions from the Citizens Oversight Committee on “Parks for All” Measure M Annual Report 2019-2020. Sonoma County voters in 2018 overwhelmingly approved “Parks for All” Measure M, a one- eighth-cent sales tax to support county and city parks for 10 years. Two-thirds of the funds go to Sonoma County for its regional parks and one-third is divided among the cities, according to population size. The measure’s expenditure plan outlines appropriate uses for the revenue. The county and cities each determines how best to prioritize the allocated funding, and a citizen oversight committee ensures the funding is spent as intended. In fiscal year 2019-20, the total Parks Measure M tax revenue was $12.3 million. The City of Sonoma received $131,795 of that revenue. The annual report certifies that city and county park’s departments have adopted budgets for Parks and Recreation that meet or exceed their baseline budget per Sonoma County Ordinance 6238. During this period the City of Sonoma allocated 75 percent of its first-year Measure M funds for future park improvements. The City will work with the community to prioritize future projects.
    [Show full text]
  • County of Sonoma Fire Agencies
    .000000 .000000 .000000 6125000 123°30'0"W 123°15'0"W 6250000 123°0'0"W 122°45'0"W 6375000 122°30'0"W r h C As nyon Cr Big Ca Col dw a r te C Rd r C e re l in e i k ta R p d k Pi u n c ne Mo o R MENDOCINO COUNTY Black Oaks C G EY h S e E r RS ry R C Cloverdale D re ek R River Park S C d Big Su h d h lphur C e R air e r r lle r N n y g c er C M R d r CLOVERDALE 65-1 Big Sulp Dr hu y ch r Cr ran Little CLOVERDALE FPD B S C R u r N lp re C i h v ur Cr e COUNTY OF SONOMA y e k R a r d G a ll o w R d r CDF-CLO C e y e COUNTY FIRE k c Cloverdale Gualala u IRP 61 B rk Regional Park o Little S F ulph Pu e Cr N ur ta ckpil C h Ro r Cr Ke d lly y R Asti R d ell Rockpile K VER Rd RI Soda A 38°45'0"N D FO L Springs L RK LA IE G A RU F U S Reserve T D S A U IA E T N H Coast Life Support C R H W I 38°45'0"N E VE R R 44-2 C R E E GEYSERVILLE FPD K R R r LAKE COUNTY D C Sea Ranch Rd iv GEYSERVILLE FPD y ge e r Annapolis ans R id r D ANNAPO Ev R LIS W d RD ic ersham NORTH SONOMA COAST FPD k Rd Lake Sonoma ler P Mil Cr in Str e aw F l M b a iddle Ridge Rd er t r ry C R mbs C r To d Stew 61-1 art Lake Sonoma 44-1 s r Po C int Recreation Area D Geyserville lls Rd ANYON R ga C DRY CREEK In 44-3 BAND M i lle Bells r R d W id Re ine g ry e R d Robert Louis Stevenson R d r D Memorial State Park C R a Y T SKA e n IN G P W C O G R S P S RT S D E s Cr A P r Brigg ST R y E d E W IN K G C R R n D r R to e y D la e C Jimtown a D k d R I S R G Stewarts IN d Lytton 61-2 R r SP H LL C Point GS ouse Cr R VA EY R S T S G 61-3 E D a T OIN KA kyline Rd RD D E P S GS N m
    [Show full text]
  • Picture Yourself at the Petaluma River Craft Beer Fest Next Year
    PetalumaBUSINESS Time Sensitive Material - Deliver by Oct. 1 PRSRT STD US POSTAGE 6 Petaluma Blvd. North, Suite A-2 PAID Petaluma, CA 94952 Networking PETALUMA, CA Events! 707-762-2785 PERMIT NO. 127 www.petalumachamber.com see page 11 Pe alum BUSINESSOctober 2017 • Vol 26, No 10 “Petaluma’st voice for business”a — A publication of the Petaluma Area Chamber of Commerce Picture Yourself at the Petaluma River Craft Beer Fest Next Year If you’ve seen the pictures of The event was sponsored by the the 2017 Petaluma River Craft Petaluma Area Chamber of Commerce Beer Festival, you should be duly and the Rotary Club of Petaluma motivated to get tickets early for Valley along with Wilibees Wine and 2018 so you won’t miss this sell out Spirits, Morris Distributing, Basin event. Not convinced, take a look at Street Properties and Petaluma more pictures from this year inside Market among more than 21 others. The proceeds from this popular event on page 4. benefit the community, local The fifth annual festival on Sept. 16 nonprofits and Petaluma River featured 23 breweries from the Bay projects. Area and two cider booths, Golden To find out how to be a Gate Cider and Gowan’s Heirloom supporter or sponsor, or for Cider. There were food providers information on the event, visit serving good eats to go with those petalumarivercraftbeerfest.org or great brews and live music was petalumachamber.com. For more provided by Randy and the Special about the 2017 Festival, follow the Agents and Sugar Moon. Chamber on FaceBook.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.2 Planning Area Description, Map and Boundaries
    3.2 Planning Area Description Southern Sonoma County SWRP/Sonoma County Water Agency 3.2 Planning Area Description, Map and Boundaries Justification of Planning Area Boundaries The planning area addressed by the Southern Sonoma Storm Water Resource Plan will include the watersheds of two neighboring tributaries to San Pablo Bay: Petaluma River and Sonoma Creek (see Figure 1). These two watersheds are well suited for coverage under a single comprehensive Storm Water Resource Plan (SWRP) because they are substantially identical to the jurisdictional areas of Sonoma County which drain into San Pablo Bay and the larger San Francisco Bay and share water quality goals driven by similar impairments in shared receiving waters. Petaluma and Sonoma watersheds also share similar and consistent typified land uses and flooding patterns that generate collaboration across watersheds. The Southern Sonoma County SWRP uses the CalWater 2.2 Hydrologic Area delineation for both watersheds in order to utilize the vast amount of existing data to support the project prioritization and quantification process. Supporting documents to be referenced within this plan have used this boundary for justification as have existing and original data sets and spatial layers. Concurrent planning efforts in the County, including the future Groundwater Sustainability Plans, pursuant to Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) and the Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and Open Space District’s (SCAPOSDs) Vital Lands Initiative, will utilize the same planning area boundary allowing collaborators to maintain consistency between regional efforts to promote land use planning and storm water management objectives, as well as potential opportunities for recharge. The hydrologic area scale was used for both watersheds as limited existing data was found through an initial analysis that would provide a comprehensive look at smaller cataloging units.
    [Show full text]
  • February 1, 2005
    Click Here to Return to Agenda DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME WILDLIFE CONSERVATION BOARD 1807 13TH STREET,SUITE 103 SACRAMENTO,CALIFORNIA 95814 (91 6) 445-8448 FAX(91 6) 323-0280 WWW.WCB.CA.GOV January 24,2005 Stanislaus County Board of Supervisors 1010 10th Street Modesto, CA 95354 Ladies and- -Gentlemen: -- Basso Bridge Ecological Reserve, Expansion #I Stanislaus County The Department of Fish and Game (DFG), through the Wildlife Conservation Board (WCB), is involved in a land acquisition program that is focused on the long-range protection and enhancement of habitat for fish and wildlife. Possible sites for acquisition are identified by the DFG in response to public interest, legislative mandate and Departmental goals. This letter is to advise you that the WCB will consider the acquisition of 32k acres of land for the preservation and enhancement of wildlife habitat located in Stanislaus County and identified as Assessor's Parcel Nos. 008-016-012 and 008-016-016. This proposal is presently scheduled for the February 24, 2005, WCB meeting. A copy of the Preliminary Agenda is enclosed for your review. If you have any questions about this proposal or would like more information, please feel free to contact Terri Muzik, our staff person assigned to this project, at (916) 445-1716, or me at (916) 445-0 137. Sincerely, -Get Al Wright Executive Director Enclosure cc: William Loudermilk, Regional Manager San Joaquin Valley - Southern Sierra Region Department of Fish and Game 1234 E. Shaw Avenue Fresno, CA 93710 Click Here to Return to Agenda B STATE OF CALIFORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGENCY ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor 1807 13'" STREET,SUITE 1 SACRAMENTO,CALIFORNIA 9581 4 (916) 445-8448 FAX (916) 323-0280 www.wcb.ca.aov NOTICE OF MEETING WILDLIFE CONSERVATION BOARD February 24,2005 10:OO A.M.
    [Show full text]
  • CNGA 20Th Anniversary What Have We Learned About Grasses Or Grasslands in the Past 20 Years? Part 2 4
    Vol. XXI, No. 2 | Spring 2011 alifornia ative rassLands rasslands ssociation G Published quarterly by the California Native Grasslands Association CNGA 20th Anniversary What have we learned about grasses or 4 grasslands in the past 20 years? part 2 3 Quick tip for grasslands: field identifying native grass seedlings 6 Spring hiking in California’s grasslands 8 Ramona Grasslands Preserve opening in spring 2011 California native plant week: April 17–23 9 Reprint from the Grasslands archives: Perennial grasses as roadside cover crops to reduce agricultural weeds 11 Roadside reveg revisited 13 California Grassland Carbon Challenge launches in January 14 Spring CNGA workshops 15 Call for submissions: California Grasslands photo exhibit Call for papers and posters—America’s Grasslands: Status, Threats, and Opportunities Fall CNGA workshops Ecology and management of grazing: an online course 16 Point Molate grassland field trip Mission Statement: From the Keyboard The Mission of the President’s alifornia California Native Grasslands Association is to promote, pring is a busy time of the year for us at ative preserve, and restore the CNGA, as well as many of you working rasslands diversity of California’s in the field. Grasses are growing and native grasses and grass- flowering, which makes it the ideal time ssociation land ecosystems through Sfor many of our workshops. The Field Day at P.O. Box 8327 education, advocacy, Woodland, CA 95776 research, and stewardship. Hedgerow Farms is an event not to be missed, 530-661-2280 and this year it will be held on April 15. Now ADMIN @CNGA.OR G | HTTP ://WWW .CNGA.OR G in its fourth year, Field Day has become one CNGA Board of Directors of our most popular events.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Common Native Flowers of Sonoma County
    wild about wildflowers A Guide to Common Native Flowers of Sonoma County Wildflowers are one of the telling signs that spring has arrived — and, in California, we’re lucky to be home to such a wide variety of native flowers, including many rare and endemic species. In fact, Sonoma, Napa and Mendocino counties are home to 358 species of wildflowers alone! This is a short, handy guide to just some of the beautiful and unusual flowers of Sonoma County, many of which can be found on Sonoma Land Trust’s protected preserves. For more resources on native California wildflowers, head over to theresources section at the end of this guide! #SonomaCountyWildflowers #HealthyLands #HealthyCommunities #NoticeNature contents Grassland Woodlands Butter and Eggs (Oak, Redwood) Tidy Tips Diogenes’ Lantern Blue-Eyed Grass Pacific Trillium Johnny Jump-Up Checker Lily Checker Mallow Fetid Adder’s Tongue Sky Lupine Douglas Iris Riparian Rare (Streamside) Sonoma Sunshine Narrowleaf Milkweed Coast Lily Seep-Spring Monkey Flower Bitter Root California Wild Rose California Mugwort Best spots for wildflower viewing butter and eggs Triphysaria eriantha Petaluma is famous for its Butter Grassland and Eggs festival — which can only be named after this adorable little Peak Season: flower, right? This annual herb is characterized by its hairy purple Jan Feb Mar Apr stem, purple leaves and wide m ay jun jul aug lower lip divided into three white- and-yellow pouches, inspiring its sep oct nov dec common name. More Info tidy tips Layia platyglossa In addition to being adorably named, Grassland this annual flower, distinguished by its yellow petals with white tips, attracts Peak Season: many species, especially butterflies, and is an important nectar plant Jan Feb Mar Apr for the threatened Checkerspot m ay jun jul aug butterfly.
    [Show full text]
  • North American Wetlands Conservation Act Proposals
    MIGRATORY BIRD CONSERVATION COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. PROGRAM FOR CONSIDERATION ON September 12, 2013 A. National Wildlife Refuge System Proposals 1. San Bernard National Wildlife Refuge, Texas 2. Turnbull National Wildlife Refuge, Washington 3. Upper Ouachita National Wildlife Refuge, Louisiana 4. Blackwater National Wildlife Refuge, Maryland B. North American Wetlands Conservation Act Proposals United States Standard Grant Proposals MEMORANDUM A. Approval of Meeting Minutes June 5, 2013 MEMORANDUM "A" MEETING MINUTES JUNE 5, 2013 The minutes of the Migratory Bird Conservation Commission meeting held on June 5, 2013, have been prepared for reading by the Commission. It is respectfully recommended that these minutes be formally approved. MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE MIGRATORY BIRD CONSERVATION COMMISSION Held in Washington, D.C., on June 5, 2013 The Migratory Bird Conservation Commission met on Wednesday, June 5, 2013, in the Main Interior Building, Secretary's Conference Room 5160. The following Commission members were present: HON. SALLY JEWELL, Secretary, Department of the Interior HON. THAD COCHRAN, Senator from Mississippi HON. MARK PRYOR, Senator from Arkansas HON. JOHN D. DINGELL, U.S. Representative from Michigan HON. ROBERT J. WITTMAN, U.S. Representative from Virginia MS. ANN MILLS, Acting Under Secretary, Natural Resources and Environment, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. HON. BOB PERCIASEPE, Acting Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. The following ex officio members were present: MS. EMILY DOMENECH, Federal Liaison, Health, Energy, and Environmental Policy, Texas Office of State-Federal Relations,Washington, D.C. MR. SPENCER GRAY, Legislative Assistant, Office of Senator Max Baucus, Washington, D.C. MR. TOMMY TUMA, Director, Habitat Stewardship, Wildlife Division, Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, Baton Rouge, Louisiana The following North American Wetlands Conservation Council ex officio members were present: MR.
    [Show full text]
  • Birding Goes to Hollywood by Daphne Smith
    VOLUME 45 October 2011 Number 2 Birding Goes to Hollywood By Daphne Smith The Big Year is coming! The movie ver- presents a fairly accurate version of Audu- the boat can’t leave because of high waves, sion, that is. bon’s founding and its history. Clearly, it’s and, naturally, the story digresses into a not every day that a major film with high mini-review of that other famous film set Some of our members may have read profile talent injects birds and birding into in our area, The Birds. We know that Bo- the book–Mark Obamscik’s best-selling the pop culture mainstream. This is a rare dega Bay deserves better. chronicle of three colorful and obses- opportunity to engage both current mem- sive birders as they compete for the big- bers and new audiences.” Although the search for rarities is inher- gest “Big Year.” Well, after watching the ent in a competitive “Big Year,” North movie’s trailer, MAS Conservation Chair Our Local Birding “Scene” Bay birders who are only looking for a Diane Hichwa noted, “I don’t quite re- good day outdoors and maybe one spe- member the book being like this…” Bodega Bay may not appear in the film, cial sighting have no need to dash to far and it has just a cameo appearance in Alaskan islands and Florida swamps–So- Fox will release The Big Year on October Obamscik’s book in a chapter called, “Bo- noma County and the Sonoma Coast are 14. This is a major Hollywood motion dega Bluff.” Two competitors meet there great birding spots.
    [Show full text]