Polymorphism in Hawkmoth Caterpillars

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Polymorphism in Hawkmoth Caterpillars POLYMORPHISM IN HAWKMOTH CATERPILLARS - AN ECOLOGICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL STUDY OF CRYPSIS IN SMERINTHUS OCELLATA (L.) AND LAOTHOE POPULI (L.) by JOY C. GRAYSON B.Sc. A thesis presented for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY awarded by the Council for National Academic Awards School of Applied Biology, Lancashire Polytechnic, Preston. July, 1986 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my supervisor Professor Malcolm Edmunds of Lancashire Polytechnic for his help, advice and useful discussions throughout the project. ± would also like to express my gratitude to Dr. Hilary Evans of Lancashire Polytechnic and Dr. George Britton of Liverpool University for their help with the biochemical aspects of the work. Many thanks to the research staff and students at the Polytechnic for interesting lunchtime discussions and also to the teaching and technical staff for helping with experimental equipment. My special thanks to Dr. Janet Edmunds for her hospitality during the summer months of 1983 and 1984, when the breeding experiments were carried out in the garage of her home in Goosnargh. I am grateful to the Natural Environmental Research Council for financial support. Finally I would like to thank Bridget Cook for typing the manuscript. -1- DECLARAT ION The work presented in this thesis was carried out in the School of Applied Biology, Lancashire Polytechnic (formerly Biology Division of Preston Polytechnic) . Unless otherwise stated it is the original work of the author. While registered as a candidate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, for which submission is now made, the author has not been a registered candidate for another award of the C.N.A.A. or of a University. This thesis has not been submitted in whole, or in part for any other degree - - ii - J. GRAYSON POLYMORPHISM IN HAWKMOTH CATERPILLARS - AN ECOLOGICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL STUDY OF CRYPSIS IN SMERINTHUS OCELLATA (L.) AND LAOTHOE POPULI (L.) Extensive field surveys in Lancashire and Merseyside have shown that for both Smerinthus ocellata (the eyed hawkmoth) and Laothoe populi (the poplar hawkmoth) there is a correlation between larval and foodplant coloration. For L. populi, experiments have shown that foodplant determines the colour of full grown caterpillars. Siblings reared on Salix fragilis L. (which has green leaves) became yellow-green, intermediate-green or dull-green whereas those reared on Populus alba L. became either white or green. Further experiments have shown that reflected light intensity may be the vital cue which determines whether a caterpillar becomes white or green. Thus for this species. the polymorphism is environmentally rather than genetically determined. However, the genetic background appears to have some effect on the proportion of dull-green and intermediate-green morphs in broods. For S. ocellata, both laboratory and field experiments have shown that the coloration of caterpillars is also determined by some environmental factors related to light. There is no simple genetic or nutritional control of larval colour in this species. Pigment extraction and analysis have shown that the proportions of different carotenoids in the main foodplants are very similar, as are the chlorophyll a to b ratios and carotenoid to chlorophyll ratios. The principal carotenoid in the food of both species of caterpillar, lutein, is sequestered by the insects in the integument and contributes to the animal's coloration. Cis-lutein is also present in small quantities in the integuments of both L. populi and S. ocellata caterpillars. Yellow-green L. populi larvae contain more lutein in the integument than dull-green morphs and in white caterpillars this carotenoid is barely detectable. Field predation experiments indicated that white caterpillars of L. populi are at a selective advantage compared with yellow-green morphs on the white undersurface of P. alba leaves. However, both white and green morphs suffered similar predation on S. fragilis bushes. - iii - CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Page 1.1 Crypsis and Colour Change in Animals 1 1.2 Polymorphism 4 1.3 Pupal Polymorphism 5 1.4 Polymorphism in Caterpillars 9 1.4.1 The Citrus Swallowtail Papilio demodocus Esper. 9 1.4.2 The Mediterranean Flour Moth Ephestia kUhniella (Zeller) 10 1.4.3 The Pine Looper Caterpillar Bupalus piniarus L. 11 1.4.4 The New World Hawkmoth Errinyis ello L. 12 1.5 Physico-Chemical Basis of Colour in Insects 13 1.6 Green Insect Pigmentation 13 1.7 Pigments in Lepidoptera 15 1.8 The Present Work 1.8.1 Introduction 19 1.8.2 Aim 19 1.8.3 The Species 20 1.8.4 Organisation of the Thesis 21 CHAPTER 2 FIELD SURVEYS 2.1 Introduction 22 2.2 Method 22 2.3 The Sites 2.3.1 Cuerden Valley Park, Lancashire 22 2.3.2 Lytham St. Annes, Lancashire 23 2.3.3 Formby Point Nature Reserve, Merseyside 26 2.3.4 Haslaam Park, Preston, Lancashire 26 2.3.5 Mill Lane, Goosnargh, Lancashire 29 2.4 The Foodplants 29 2.5 Colour and Resting Behaviour of Poplar and Eyed Hawkmoth Larvae 30 2.6 Results and Discussion 2.6.1 Eyed Hawkmoth 32 2.6.2 Poplar Hawkmoth 38 CHAPTER 3 BREEDING PROGRAMME 3.1 Introduction 41 3.2 Rearing Methods 41 3.3 Establishment of the Number of Instars in Laothoe Populi and Smerinthus ocellata Caterpillars 44 3.3.1 Introduction 44 - iv - Page 3.3.2 Method 46 3.3.3 Results and Discussion 46 3.3.3.1 Poplar Hawkmoth 46 3.3.3.2 Eyed Hawkmoth 49 3.4 Growth, Development and Survival of Poplar Hawkmoths on S. fragilis and P. alba 3.4.1 Introduction and Aims 54 3.4.2 Method 54 3.4.3 Results and Discussion 58 3.4.3.1 Mortality of L. populi larvae on S. fragilis and P. alba 58 3.4.3.2 Larval Developmental Time 62 3.4.3.3 Pupal Weights, Adult Wingspan and Egg Production of L. populi Reared as Larvae on S. fragilis or P. alba 63 3.5 Summary of Sections 3.3 and 3.4 67 CHAPTER 4 LABORATORY REARING PROGRAMME - LAOTHOE POPULI 4.0 Aim 68 4.1 Experiment 1 4.1.0 Aim 68 4.1.1 Method 68 4.1.2 Results and Conclusion 69 4.2 Experiment 2 4.2.0 Aim 69 4.2.1 Experiment 2a 4.2.1.1 Method 71 4.2.1.2 Results and Conclusion 71 4.2.2 Experiment 2b 4.2.1.1 Method 71 4.2.1.2 Results and Conclusion 74 4.2.3 Experiment 2c 4.2.3.1 Method 74 4.2.3.2 Results and Conclusion 75 4.2.4 Conclusion for Experiment 2 75 4.3 Experiment 3 4.3.0 Preamble and Aim 76 4.3.1 Method 77 4.3.2 Results and Conclusion 77 4.3.2.1 Frequency of Dull-Green and Intermediate-Green Morphs 77 4.3.2.2 Frequency of Red Spotted Morphs 78 4.4 Experiment 4 4.4.0 Aim 78 4.4.1 Method 83 4.4.2 Results and Conclusion 83 4.5 Experiment 5 4.5.0 Aim 86 4.5.1 Method 86 4.5.2 Results and Conclusion 87 IN Page 4.6 Experiment 6 4.6.0 Aim 87 4.6.1 Method 87 4.6.2 Results and Conclusion 89 4.7 Experiment 7 4.7.0 Aim 91 4.7.1 Method 91 4.7.2 Results and Conclusion 91 4.8 Experiment 8 4.8.0 Introduction 93 4.8.1 Aim 95 4.8.2 Method 95 4.8.3 Results and Conclusion 95 CHAPTER 5 LABORATORY REARING PROGRAMME - SMERINTHUS OCELLATA 5.0 Introduction 99 5.1 Experiment 1 5.1.1 Aim 99 5.1.2 Method 99 5.1.3 Results and Discussion 99 5.2 Experiment 2 5.2.1 Aim 101 5.2.2 Experiment 2a 102 5.2.2.1 Method 102 5.2.2.2 Results and Discussion 102 5.2.3 Experiment 2b 103 5.2.3.1 Method 103 5.2.3.2 Results and Discussion 103 5.3 Experiment 3 5.3.1 Aim 104 5.3.2 Method 104 5.3.3 Results and Discussion 105 5.4 Experiment 4 5.4.1 Aim 105 5.4.2 Method 105 5.4.3 Results and Discussion 106 CHAPTER 6 FIELD PREDATION EXPERIMENTS 6.1 Aim 108 6.2 Experiment 1 6.2.1 Method 108 6.2.2 Results and Discussion 108 6.2.3 Conclus ion 112 6.3 Experiment 2 6.3.1 Method 112 6.3.2 Results and Discussion 113 - vi - CHAPTER 7 BIOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF PLANT AND LARVAL Page PIGMENTATION 7.1 Introduction 119 7.2 Aim 121 7.3 Methods 7.3.2 The Larvae 121 7.3.2 The Foodplants 123 7.3.3 Pigment Analysis 123 7.3.4 Extraction of Pigments 123 7.3.5 Estimation of Chlorophylls a and b 125 7.3.6 Separation of Carotenoids 125 7.3.6.1 Preparation of Silica Gel Plates 125 7.3.6.2 Thin Layer chromatography 126 7.3.6.3 Carotenoid Identification 126 7.3.6.4 Hcl Test for Carotenoid Epoxides 128 7.3.6.5 Quantitative Estimation of Carotenoids 128 7.4 Results and Discussion 7.4.1 The Foodplants 128 7.4.2 Laothoe populi Larvae 129 7.4.3 The Gut Sacs 138 7.4.4 The Frass 140 7.4.5 The Fat Body 140 7.4.6 The Eggs 142 7.4.7 Smerinthus ocellata Larvae 142 7.5 Summary of Results 142 CHAPTER 8 GENERAL DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS 8.1 Environmental Polymorphism in Lepidopterous Larvae 145 8.2 Environmental Polymorphism in Laothoe populi Larvae 147 8.3 Environmental Polymorphism in Smerinthus ocellata Larvae 148 8.4 Genetic Polymorphism in L.
Recommended publications
  • Phylogenetic Relationships and Historical Biogeography of Tribes and Genera in the Subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)
    Blackwell Science, LtdOxford, UKBIJBiological Journal of the Linnean Society 0024-4066The Linnean Society of London, 2005? 2005 862 227251 Original Article PHYLOGENY OF NYMPHALINAE N. WAHLBERG ET AL Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2005, 86, 227–251. With 5 figures . Phylogenetic relationships and historical biogeography of tribes and genera in the subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) NIKLAS WAHLBERG1*, ANDREW V. Z. BROWER2 and SÖREN NYLIN1 1Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden 2Department of Zoology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331–2907, USA Received 10 January 2004; accepted for publication 12 November 2004 We infer for the first time the phylogenetic relationships of genera and tribes in the ecologically and evolutionarily well-studied subfamily Nymphalinae using DNA sequence data from three genes: 1450 bp of cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) (in the mitochondrial genome), 1077 bp of elongation factor 1-alpha (EF1-a) and 400–403 bp of wing- less (both in the nuclear genome). We explore the influence of each gene region on the support given to each node of the most parsimonious tree derived from a combined analysis of all three genes using Partitioned Bremer Support. We also explore the influence of assuming equal weights for all characters in the combined analysis by investigating the stability of clades to different transition/transversion weighting schemes. We find many strongly supported and stable clades in the Nymphalinae. We are also able to identify ‘rogue’
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-Eared Bats a Symposium
    Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-eared Bats A Symposium y Edited b Susan C. Loeb, Michael J. Lacki, and Darren A. Miller U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Research Station General Technical Report SRS-145 DISCLAIMER The use of trade or firm names in this publication is for reader information and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture of any product or service. Papers published in these proceedings were submitted by authors in electronic media. Some editing was done to ensure a consistent format. Authors are responsible for content and accuracy of their individual papers and the quality of illustrative materials. Cover photos: Large photo: Craig W. Stihler; small left photo: Joseph S. Johnson; small middle photo: Craig W. Stihler; small right photo: Matthew J. Clement. December 2011 Southern Research Station 200 W.T. Weaver Blvd. Asheville, NC 28804 Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-eared Bats: A Symposium Athens, Georgia March 9–10, 2010 Edited by: Susan C. Loeb U.S Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Research Station Michael J. Lacki University of Kentucky Darren A. Miller Weyerhaeuser NR Company Sponsored by: Forest Service Bat Conservation International National Council for Air and Stream Improvement (NCASI) Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources Offield Family Foundation ContEntS Preface . v Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-Eared Bats: An Introduction . 1 Susan C. Loeb, Michael J. Lacki, and Darren A. Miller Distribution and Status of Eastern Big-eared Bats (Corynorhinus Spp .) . 13 Mylea L. Bayless, Mary Kay Clark, Richard C. Stark, Barbara S.
    [Show full text]
  • Invertebrate Distribution and Diversity Assessment at the U. S. Army Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site a Report to the U
    Invertebrate Distribution and Diversity Assessment at the U. S. Army Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site A report to the U. S. Army and U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service G. J. Michels, Jr., J. L. Newton, H. L. Lindon, and J. A. Brazille Texas AgriLife Research 2301 Experiment Station Road Bushland, TX 79012 2008 Report Introductory Notes The invertebrate survey in 2008 presented an interesting challenge. Extremely dry conditions prevailed throughout most of the adult activity period for the invertebrates and grass fires occurred several times throughout the summer. By visual assessment, plant resources were scarce compared to last year, with few green plants and almost no flowering plants. Eight habitats and nine sites continued to be sampled in 2008. The Ponderosa pine/ yellow indiangrass site was removed from the study after the low numbers of species and individuals collected there in 2007. All other sites from the 2007 survey were included in the 2008 survey. We also discontinued the collection of Coccinellidae in the 2008 survey, as only 98 individuals from four species were collected in 2007. Pitfall and malaise trapping were continued in the same way as the 2007 survey. Sweep net sampling was discontinued to allow time for Asilidae and Orthoptera timed surveys consisting of direct collection of individuals with a net. These surveys were conducted in the same way as the time constrained butterfly (Papilionidea and Hesperoidea) surveys, with 15-minute intervals for each taxanomic group. This was sucessful when individuals were present, but the dry summer made it difficult to assess the utility of these techniques because of overall low abundance of insects.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny and Biogeography of Hawkmoths (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae): Evidence from Five Nuclear Genes
    Phylogeny and Biogeography of Hawkmoths (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae): Evidence from Five Nuclear Genes Akito Y. Kawahara1*, Andre A. Mignault1, Jerome C. Regier2, Ian J. Kitching3, Charles Mitter1 1 Department of Entomology, College Park, Maryland, United States of America, 2 Center for Biosystems Research, University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute, College Park, Maryland, United States of America, 3 Department of Entomology, The Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom Abstract Background: The 1400 species of hawkmoths (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae) comprise one of most conspicuous and well- studied groups of insects, and provide model systems for diverse biological disciplines. However, a robust phylogenetic framework for the family is currently lacking. Morphology is unable to confidently determine relationships among most groups. As a major step toward understanding relationships of this model group, we have undertaken the first large-scale molecular phylogenetic analysis of hawkmoths representing all subfamilies, tribes and subtribes. Methodology/Principal Findings: The data set consisted of 131 sphingid species and 6793 bp of sequence from five protein-coding nuclear genes. Maximum likelihood and parsimony analyses provided strong support for more than two- thirds of all nodes, including strong signal for or against nearly all of the fifteen current subfamily, tribal and sub-tribal groupings. Monophyly was strongly supported for some of these, including Macroglossinae, Sphinginae, Acherontiini, Ambulycini, Philampelini, Choerocampina, and Hemarina. Other groupings proved para- or polyphyletic, and will need significant redefinition; these include Smerinthinae, Smerinthini, Sphingini, Sphingulini, Dilophonotini, Dilophonotina, Macroglossini, and Macroglossina. The basal divergence, strongly supported, is between Macroglossinae and Smerinthinae+Sphinginae. All genes contribute significantly to the signal from the combined data set, and there is little conflict between genes.
    [Show full text]
  • British Lepidoptera (/)
    British Lepidoptera (/) Home (/) Anatomy (/anatomy.html) FAMILIES 1 (/families-1.html) GELECHIOIDEA (/gelechioidea.html) FAMILIES 3 (/families-3.html) FAMILIES 4 (/families-4.html) NOCTUOIDEA (/noctuoidea.html) BLOG (/blog.html) Glossary (/glossary.html) Family: SPHINGIDAE (3SF 13G 18S) Suborder:Glossata Infraorder:Heteroneura Superfamily:Bombycoidea Refs: Waring & Townsend, Wikipedia, MBGBI9 Proboscis short to very long, unscaled. Antenna ~ 1/2 length of forewing; fasciculate or pectinate in male, simple in female; apex pointed. Labial palps long, 3-segmented. Eye large. Ocelli absent. Forewing long, slender. Hindwing ±triangular. Frenulum and retinaculum usually present but may be reduced. Tegulae large, prominent. Leg spurs variable but always present on midtibia. 1st tarsal segment of mid and hindleg about as long as tibia. Subfamily: Smerinthinae (3G 3S) Tribe: Smerinthini Probably characterised by a short proboscis and reduced or absent frenulum Mimas Smerinthus Laothoe 001 Mimas tiliae (Lime Hawkmoth) 002 Smerinthus ocellata (Eyed Hawkmoth) 003 Laothoe populi (Poplar Hawkmoth) (/002- (/001-mimas-tiliae-lime-hawkmoth.html) smerinthus-ocellata-eyed-hawkmoth.html) (/003-laothoe-populi-poplar-hawkmoth.html) Subfamily: Sphinginae (3G 4S) Rest with wings in tectiform position Tribe: Acherontiini Agrius Acherontia 004 Agrius convolvuli 005 Acherontia atropos (Convolvulus Hawkmoth) (Death's-head Hawkmoth) (/005- (/004-agrius-convolvuli-convolvulus- hawkmoth.html) acherontia-atropos-deaths-head-hawkmoth.html) Tribe: Sphingini Sphinx (2S)
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey on Sphingidae (Lepidoptera) Species of South Eastern Turkey
    Cumhuriyet Science Journal e-ISSN: 2587-246X Cumhuriyet Sci. J., 41(1) (2020) 319-326 ISSN: 2587-2680 http://dx.doi.org/10.17776/csj.574903 A survey on sphingidae (lepidoptera) species of south eastern Turkey with new distributional records Erdem SEVEN 1 * 1 Department of Gastronomy and Culinary Arts, School of Tourism and Hotel Management, Batman University, 72060, Batman, Turkey. Abstract Article info History: This paper provides comments on the Sphingidae species of south eastern Turkey by the field Received:10.06.2019 surveys are conducted between in 2015-2017. A total of 15 species are determined as a result Accepted:20.12.2019 of the investigations from Batman, Diyarbakır and Mardin provinces. With this study, the Keywords: number of sphinx moths increased to 13 in Batman, 14 in Diyarbakır and 8 in Mardin. Among Fauna, them, 7 species for Batman, 4 species for Diyarbakır and 1 species for Mardin are new record. Hawk moths, For each species, original reference, type locality, material examined, distribution in the world New records, and in Turkey, and larval hostplants are given. Adults figures of Smerinthus kindermanni Sphingidae, Lederer, 1852; Marumba quercus ([Denis & Schiffermüller], 1775); Rethera komarovi Turkey. (Christoph, 1885); Macroglossum stellatarum (Linnaeus, 1758); Hyles euphorbiae (Linnaeus, 1758) and H. livornica (Esper, [1780]) are illustrated. 1. Introduction 18, 22-24]: Acherontia atropos (Linnaeus, 1758); Agrius convolvuli (Linnaeus, 1758); Akbesia davidi (Oberthür, 1884); Clarina kotschyi (Kollar, [1849]); C. The Sphingidae family classified in the Sphingoidea syriaca (Lederer, 1855); Daphnis nerii (Linnaeus, Superfamily and species of the family are generally 1758); Deilephila elpenor (Linnaeus, 1758); D.
    [Show full text]
  • Contribution to the Knowledge of the Fauna of Bombyces, Sphinges And
    driemaandelijks tijdschrift van de VLAAMSE VERENIGING VOOR ENTOMOLOGIE Afgiftekantoor 2170 Merksem 1 ISSN 0771-5277 Periode: oktober – november – december 2002 Erkenningsnr. P209674 Redactie: Dr. J–P. Borie (Compiègne, France), Dr. L. De Bruyn (Antwerpen), T. C. Garrevoet (Antwerpen), B. Goater (Chandlers Ford, England), Dr. K. Maes (Gent), Dr. K. Martens (Brussel), H. van Oorschot (Amsterdam), D. van der Poorten (Antwerpen), W. O. De Prins (Antwerpen). Redactie-adres: W. O. De Prins, Nieuwe Donk 50, B-2100 Antwerpen (Belgium). e-mail: [email protected]. Jaargang 30, nummer 4 1 december 2002 Contribution to the knowledge of the fauna of Bombyces, Sphinges and Noctuidae of the Southern Ural Mountains, with description of a new Dichagyris (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae, Endromidae, Saturniidae, Sphingidae, Notodontidae, Noctuidae, Pantheidae, Lymantriidae, Nolidae, Arctiidae) Kari Nupponen & Michael Fibiger [In co-operation with Vladimir Olschwang, Timo Nupponen, Jari Junnilainen, Matti Ahola and Jari- Pekka Kaitila] Abstract. The list, comprising 624 species in the families Lasiocampidae, Endromidae, Saturniidae, Sphingidae, Notodontidae, Noctuidae, Pantheidae, Lymantriidae, Nolidae and Arctiidae from the Southern Ural Mountains is presented. The material was collected during 1996–2001 in 10 different expeditions. Dichagyris lux Fibiger & K. Nupponen sp. n. is described. 17 species are reported for the first time from Europe: Clostera albosigma (Fitch, 1855), Xylomoia retinax Mikkola, 1998, Ecbolemia misella (Püngeler, 1907), Pseudohadena stenoptera Boursin, 1970, Hadula nupponenorum Hacker & Fibiger, 2002, Saragossa uralica Hacker & Fibiger, 2002, Conisania arida (Lederer, 1855), Polia malchani (Draudt, 1934), Polia vespertilio (Draudt, 1934), Polia altaica (Lederer, 1853), Mythimna opaca (Staudinger, 1899), Chersotis stridula (Hampson, 1903), Xestia wockei (Möschler, 1862), Euxoa dsheiron Brandt, 1938, Agrotis murinoides Poole, 1989, Agrotis sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Insects That Feed on Trees and Shrubs
    INSECTS THAT FEED ON COLORADO TREES AND SHRUBS1 Whitney Cranshaw David Leatherman Boris Kondratieff Bulletin 506A TABLE OF CONTENTS DEFOLIATORS .................................................... 8 Leaf Feeding Caterpillars .............................................. 8 Cecropia Moth ................................................ 8 Polyphemus Moth ............................................. 9 Nevada Buck Moth ............................................. 9 Pandora Moth ............................................... 10 Io Moth .................................................... 10 Fall Webworm ............................................... 11 Tiger Moth ................................................. 12 American Dagger Moth ......................................... 13 Redhumped Caterpillar ......................................... 13 Achemon Sphinx ............................................. 14 Table 1. Common sphinx moths of Colorado .......................... 14 Douglas-fir Tussock Moth ....................................... 15 1. Whitney Cranshaw, Colorado State University Cooperative Extension etnomologist and associate professor, entomology; David Leatherman, entomologist, Colorado State Forest Service; Boris Kondratieff, associate professor, entomology. 8/93. ©Colorado State University Cooperative Extension. 1994. For more information, contact your county Cooperative Extension office. Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture,
    [Show full text]
  • The Taxonomy of Utah Orthoptera
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 14 Number 3 – Number 4 Article 1 12-30-1954 The taxonomy of Utah Orthoptera Andrew H. Barnum Brigham Young University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Barnum, Andrew H. (1954) "The taxonomy of Utah Orthoptera," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 14 : No. 3 , Article 1. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol14/iss3/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. IMUS.COMP.ZSOL iU6 1 195^ The Great Basin Naturalist harvard Published by the HWIilIijM i Department of Zoology and Entomology Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah Volum e XIV DECEMBER 30, 1954 Nos. 3 & 4 THE TAXONOMY OF UTAH ORTHOPTERA^ ANDREW H. BARNUM- Grand Junction, Colorado INTRODUCTION During the years of 1950 to 1952 a study of the taxonomy and distribution of the Utah Orthoptera was made at the Brigham Young University by the author under the direction of Dr. Vasco M. Tan- ner. This resulted in a listing of the species found in the State. Taxonomic keys were made and compiled covering these species. Distributional notes where available were made with the brief des- criptions of the species. The work was based on the material in the entomological col- lection of the Brigham Young University, with additional records obtained from the collection of the Utah State Agricultural College.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Record of Aglais Milberti (Godart, 1819) from the Territory of Russia 101 Atalanta 42 (1-4): 101, Würzburg (2011), ISSN 0171-0079
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Atalanta Jahr/Year: 2011 Band/Volume: 42 Autor(en)/Author(s): Churkin Sergei V., Zamolodchikov Dmitry Artikel/Article: The first record of Aglais milberti (Godart, 1819) from the territory of Russia 101 Atalanta 42 (1-4): 101, Würzburg (2011), ISSN 0171-0079 The first record ofAglais milberti (GODART , 1819) from the territory of Russia (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae) by SERGEI CHURKIN & DMITRY ZAMOLO dc HIKOV received 20.V.2011 Summary: Aglais milberti (GO D ART , 1819) was found in the territory of Russia (East Churkotka) for the first time. The subspecies status needs further clarification. Резюме: Aglais milberti (GO D ART , 1819) впервые отмечена для территории России (Вост. Чукотка). Подвидовой статус нуждается в дальнейшем уточнении. A fresh † of Aglais milberti (GO D ART , 1819) (the figures are enlarged) was collected by .D ZAMOLO dc HIKOV at Lavrentia Bay (Russia, East Churkotka, 20 km W Lavrentia Bay , “Tri brata” hill, 400 m.a.s.l. , 27.VII.2004). It is deposited in the private collection of the second author. Worth to note several facts: - there are no Aglais-records from Chukotka; - this is the first record of this species from the territory of the Russian Federation; - the butterfly was found in the place where the second author collected many times; the butterflies were not found before 2004 neither after 2004. The habitat is typical for Chukotka: alpine meadows in closed valleys, protected from the wind by the surrounding mountain slopes; the meadows are situated among the tundras with Betula exilis.
    [Show full text]
  • The Feasibility of Use of Caecal and Diverticular Coloration in Field Determination of Grasshopper Diet
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 4 Number 1 -- Spring 1971 Number 1 -- Spring Article 4 1971 July 2017 The Feasibility of Use of Caecal and Diverticular Coloration in Field Determination of Grasshopper Diet Michael Tyrkus Wayne State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Tyrkus, Michael 2017. "The Feasibility of Use of Caecal and Diverticular Coloration in Field Determination of Grasshopper Diet," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 4 (1) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol4/iss1/4 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Tyrkus: The Feasibility of Use of Caecal and Diverticular Coloration in F THE MICHIGAN ENTOMOLOGIST Vol. 4, No. 1 THE FEASIBILITY OF USE OF CAECAL AND DIVERTICULAR COLORATION IN FIELD DETERMINATION OF GRASSHOPPER DIET',' Michael Tyrkus Department of Biology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48202 INTRODUCTION Many studies have been undertaken in the past on the food selection, food preferences, and economic damage of various grasshoppers and their allies. Among the more salient of these researches are those of Anderson (1961, 1964); Ball (1 936); Bindra (1958); Boldyrev (1928); Blackith and Blackith (1966); Brues (1946); Chapman (1957); Dibble (1940); Gangwere (1959, 1960, 1961, 1965, 1965a, 1966, 1966a, 1967);Husain etal. (1946); Isely (1938, 1946); Isely and Alexander (1949); Joyce (1952); Mulkern and Anderson (1959); Mulkern, Anderson, and Brusven (1962); Mulkern et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Insects and Plants Short-Winged Green Grasshopper Often, Insects Can Be Found on Or Around Certain Plants Because of Their Life Cycles
    Order Orthoptera: Grasshoppers & Kin Insects and Plants Short-winged Green Grasshopper Often, insects can be found on or around certain plants because of their life cycles. Here Dichromorpha viridis are a few plants at Horse Hill that support a Can be green, brown, or a high diversity of insect species. mix. Found in fields. Milkweed Fork-tailed Bush Katydid Clusters of pink flowers, large Insects seed pods. Insects that eat this Scudderia furcata are often red/orange and black Found on deciduous trees to show they are poisonous. and shrubs. Their call can be heard day and night. Goldenrod Various types found in fields Order Diptera: Flies and forests. Attracts many types of pollinators and predators. Hover Fly Blackberry Toxomerus geminatus Thorny brambles. Insects use the The larva of this harmless leaves, stems, and fruit for food bee-mimic is a predator of and also for shelter. aphids, helping gardeners. Jewelweed Deer Fly Also called touch-me-not for its Chrysops sp. exploding seed pods. Usually grows near poison ivy and is a of Horse Hill Nature Only females bite, males natural remedy for such. drink nectar. The larvae are aquatic. Most common in July. Why be interested in insects? Preserve Class Arachnida: Spiders & Kin Insects dominate planet Earth in both diversity Other arthropods are also diverse, and and multitude. They come in every shape, color, captivating in their life cycles and habits. and form, some undergoing transformations that defy imagination. The vast majority of Goldenrod Crab Spider By Molly Jacobson insects are beneficial or harmless, and all are Misumena vatia fascinating.
    [Show full text]