Dynamic Consent in the Digital Age of Biology

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

ETHICS Dynamic consent in the digital age of biology Richman Wee LLM he concept of ‘dynamic consent’, formulat- prietary genetic banking system was proposed by Faculty of Law—Law ed more than a decade ago and increasingly First Genetic Trust (FGT).3 The concern people Foundation–sponsored Centre for Law and Policy Tused in a number of health information and might have over the security of their personal in Emerging Technologies, communications technology (ICT) initiatives, has genetic data was identified by FGT as a potential University of Otago, Dunedin, been attracting strong interest from innovators barrier in the development of pharmacogenetics New Zealand and commentators. Dynamic consent has been ex- and personalised medicine. To provide greater plored and discussed in the literature on research assurance for individuals that their privacy will ethics, biobanking and genomic medicine. Early be strongly protected, FGT proposed a dynamic references to dynamic consent can be traced back informed consent mechanism that would protect to 2001, when stronger safeguards for protect- ‘the confidentiality of individual medical and ing the confidentiality of individual medical and genetic information, allowing access to select genetic information were being investigated, in information and the use or application of an order to support advances in the field of pharmaco- individual’s DNA only when the patient has genetics and personalised medicine. At that time, given specific consent [emphasis added].’4 FGT a rough draft of the human genome had been pub- would have the role of a third-party broker of lished by both the publicly funded international genetic information—as an intermediary between consortium, known as the Human Genome Pro- patients or research participants on one hand, ject, and the private commercial company called and those conducting genetic research, such as Celera Genomics, headed by J Craig Venter. Last medical researchers, health care providers and year, Venter heralded the arrival of the ‘digital age pharmaceutical companies on the other hand.5 of biology’.1,2 He spoke on the interchangeability of the digital and biological worlds, and envisioned As a trusted third party, FGT would create the a time when our personal biology would be trans- confidential database to the standard of ‘a struc- mitted across the internet at the speed of light. ture with Swiss bank–grade security’.6,7 Individu- als would consent to their genetic information This is the first article in a two-part series being stored in FGT’s database for clinical re- examining a selected number of overseas projects search use and they would control access to their that have developed the idea of dynamic consent own data. Such a protected environment would for use in the management of information and safeguard their privacy and maintain the confi- samples in the health context. dentiality of their genetic and medical informa- tion while they participate in genetic research.8,9 Projects and collaborations exploring The internet would be used by FGT to maintain dynamic consent mechanisms ongoing communication with them, for instance, to provide updates on research findings, seek con- sent for follow-up medical treatment or research First Genetic Trust studies, supply further detailed information J PRIM HEALTH CARE Early references to the dynamic consent approach about the risks and benefits of research projects, 2013;5(3):259–261. can be traced back to 2001 when an online pro- obtain specific consent for new uses of the data, CORRESPONDENCE TO: The ETHICS column explores issues around practising ethically in primary health care and aims to Richman Wee encourage thoughtfulness about ethical dilemmas that we may face. Faculty of Law, University of Otago, THIS ISSUE: This article is the first in a two-part series looking at international projects involved in the PO Box 56, Dunedin development of dynamic consent processes for accessing patient health information and samples. 9054, New Zealand [email protected] VOLUME 5 • NUMBER 3 • SEPTEMBER 2013 JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE 259 ETHICS and to re-contact them with new requests.10 For decide whether their genetic, mental health, researchers, FGT’s internet-based systems would or any other information they deem sensi- assist them in efficiently collecting, storing, man- tive, should be shared and, if so, with whom. aging and analysing the genetic and medical data In addition, the Private Access online system for use in clinical trials.11 For drug companies, the enables the information of individuals to be FGT database could establish the link between searchable by selected researchers. their company and physician networks, to en- able direct access to many thousands of clinical EnCoRe—Ensuring Consent trial patients or samples for pharmacogenetics and Revocation programmes.9 EnCoRe is a recent information and communi- cations technology (ICT) research project that Private Access examines the design and development of dynamic Private Access Inc., founded in 2006 and head- consent mechanisms.16,17 EnCoRe officially began quartered in California, has been a widely publi- in June 2008 with £3.6 million funding. The cised example of technology being employed for EnCoRe project, undertaken by a group of UK connecting a wide range of stakeholders online multidisciplinary academic researchers and to generate greater awareness and participation industry partners, envisions giving individuals for clinical trials, as well as to bolster recruit- more control over their personal information. ment, increase enrolment, and enable consent With technological ‘know-how’, EnCoRe aims to be sought and obtained on an ongoing and to enable individuals to exercise the choice of interactive basis. All this is achieved with the granting and revoking consent over the use of development of an online clinical trial commu- their information in a way that—in the words of nity that involves patients, physicians and re- the researchers—would be as easy, intuitive and searchers, and is used industry-wide and includes reliable as turning a tap on or off. The EnCoRe a wide range of partners, such as clinical trial system has been described as a ‘patient-centric IT sponsors, patient advocacy groups, technology system which uses a “dynamic consent” approach providers, and other key public and private stake- [emphasis added].’18 holders.12 In addition, Private Access provides opportunities for engaging in social networking Biobanking is one of EnCoRe’s areas of focus on the clinical trial experience. Private Access for designing a system that manages consent extends the current capabilities of internet-based and revocation. ‘Biobanking patients’, as the search engines, to create the ability for properly EnCoRe documents describe them, would authenticated persons (for example, doctors, fam- achieve levels of control over how informa- ily members, researchers and others) to search tion and data relating to them are used by for highly confidential or sensitive personal researchers and clinicians in two ways. The information, based on the ‘private access’ rights first involves methods that inform biobank- that each individual can create to control who ing patients as to the uses of their personal can (or cannot) see all or any particular parts of information; that is, these are predominantly, the individual’s information.13,14,15 if not exclusively, informational in nature. The second involves methods that permit them The patented technology employed by Private to make meaningful decisions that can affect Access offers individuals the ability to exercise future uses of their information; that is, these dynamic, granular data control over their facilitate a two-way exchange of information information. The controls are dynamic in the and allow decisional functions to be exercised. sense that individuals can, at any time, change previously selected preferences as their circum- The key features of EnCoRe, as summarised by stances change, different needs arise, or deeper the researchers working on the project, can be levels of trust are established. The controls categorised in the following four ways. First, provide the ability to be granular down to the individuals can, through the IT interface, specify desired data element, enabling individuals to their preferences about the choices they are 260 VOLUME 5 • NUMBER 3 • SEPTEMBER 2013 JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE ETHICS given about the use of their data and samples for 7. Cambridge Healthtech Institute. The art of translating research. Second, the EnCoRe system allows indi- genomic data into clinical practice: an interview with David Wang of First Genetic Trust. Molecular Med Monthly. 2004; viduals to change their mind and preferences over 41; [cited 2012 Oct 17]. Available from: http://www.chidb. time, and to have their choices revoked where com/newsarticles/issue41_1.asp appropriate. Third, individuals have the ability to 8. iBIO News. Congratulations to First Genetic Trust for receiving banking system patent. 3 Feb 2004; [cited 2012 Oct 14]. Avail- track and audit any changes they make. Fourth, able from: http://www.ibio.org/NEWS_EVENTS/nws-detail. they can choose when and how they are con- lasso?nws_id=1232 tacted. With the EnCoRe model, consent is ‘not a 9. Lewis G. Tissue collection and the pharmaceutical industry. In: Genetic databases: socio-ethical issues in the collection mere communication exercise but a bidirectional, and use of DNA. Tutton R & Corrigan O, editors. Routledge: ongoing, interactive process between patients and London; 2004. p 189. researchers.’18 10. Weir RF, Olick RS. The stored tissue issue: biomedical re- search, ethics and law in the era of genomic medicine. Oxford University Press; 2004. p 65. Dynamic consent has the potential to build 11. GenomeWeb LLC. Hewlett-Packard Secures IT Infrastructure on key elements of informed consent and help Partnership with First Genetic Trust, 2001; [cited 2012 Sept 14]. Available from: Bioinform. http://h20426.www2.hp.com/ foster deep respect for the rights and interests of products/workstation/kr/ko/fyi_newsletter/0305/file/BioIn- patients and participants.
Recommended publications
  • An Online, Dynamic Consent and Participant Engagement Platform Working Towards Solving the Complexities of Consent in Genomic Research

    An Online, Dynamic Consent and Participant Engagement Platform Working Towards Solving the Complexities of Consent in Genomic Research

    European Journal of Human Genetics (2021) 29:687–698 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-020-00782-w ARTICLE ‘CTRL’: an online, Dynamic Consent and participant engagement platform working towards solving the complexities of consent in genomic research 1,2 3 4 5 6,7 7 Matilda A. Haas ● Harriet Teare ● Megan Prictor ● Gabi Ceregra ● Miranda E. Vidgen ● David Bunker ● 3,4 1,2 Jane Kaye ● Tiffany Boughtwood Received: 2 July 2020 / Revised: 9 November 2020 / Accepted: 18 November 2020 / Published online: 6 January 2021 © The Author(s) 2021. This article is published with open access Abstract The complexities of the informed consent process for participating in research in genomic medicine are well-documented. Inspired by the potential for Dynamic Consent to increase participant choice and autonomy in decision-making, as well as the opportunities for ongoing participant engagement it affords, we wanted to trial Dynamic Consent and to do so developed our own web-based application (web app) called CTRL (control). This paper documents the design and development of CTRL, for use in the Australian Genomics study: a health services research project building evidence to inform the 1234567890();,: 1234567890();,: integration of genomic medicine into mainstream healthcare. Australian Genomics brought together a multi-disciplinary team to develop CTRL. The design and development process considered user experience; security and privacy; the application of international standards in data sharing; IT, operational and ethical issues. The CTRL tool is now being offered to participants in the study, who can use CTRL to keep personal and contact details up to date; make consent choices (including indicate preferences for return of results and future research use of biological samples, genomic and health data); follow their progress through the study; complete surveys, contact the researchers and access study news and information.
  • Dynamic Consent in the Digital Age of Biology: Online Initiatives and Regulatory Considerations

    Dynamic Consent in the Digital Age of Biology: Online Initiatives and Regulatory Considerations

    ETHICS Dynamic consent in the digital age of biology: online initiatives and regulatory considerations Richman Wee LLM;1 Mark Henaghan BA, LLB (Hons);2 Ingrid Winship MBChB, MD3 ‘Dynamic consent’ is discussed in this second article of a two-part series examining projects that have developed the concept in order to manage the use of information and samples in the health context. The first article was published in the September 2013 issue of the Journal of Primary Health Care.1 ere, online initiatives by two private collection of phenotype data and other per- 1 New Zealand Law companies, 23andMe and PatientsLikeMe, sonal information through web-based surveys, Foundation Centre for Law and Policy in Emerging that utilise a system of dynamic consent in order to perform genome-wide association Technologies, Faculty of H 3 for the collection and use of a large volume of studies (GWAS). In March 2012, 23andMe Law, University of Otago, health and medical data, are discussed. Based reported having DNA data for approximately New Zealand on the overseas projects discussed in these two 200 000 customers (with nearly 90% having 2 Dean of Law, Faculty of Law, online initiatives and the projects discussed in opted in to participate in research), and more University of Otago the first article, a description of the essential than 90 million individual survey responses or 3 Royal Melbourne Hospital 4 characteristics for the new and evolving concept ‘phenotypic data points’. An earlier announce- and Department of Medicine, of dynamic consent will be offered. In addition, ment by 23andMe stated that from a total of University of Melbourne, new possibilities as well as limitations will be about 100 000 customers, around 76% agreed Melbourne, Australia noted.
  • Informed Consent

    Informed Consent

    Ethics of Biobanking Robert E Rosenthal MD Section of Hyperbaric Medicine RAC Shock Trauma Center PRE-CONFERENCE PROGRAM Contemporary Issues in Biobanking: Governance, Consent, and Practical Approaches to Current Challenges Biobanking: Definition “Biobank” first appeared in scientific literature in 1996. What is a Biobank? 303 survey responses from managers of sample collections There is consensus that the term biobank may be applied to biological collections of human, animal, plant or microbial samples; and that the term biobank should only be applied to sample collections with associated sample data, and to collections that are managed according to professional standards. There was no consensus on whether a collection's purpose, size or level of access should determine whether it is called a biobank. Hewitt R, and Watson P . Biopreservation and Biobanking. 2013, 11(5): 309-315 Biobank: Examples Small, Disease Specific Collections Cooperative Federal Projects Prospectively Collecting Samples Established in 1987 via NCI Support Funded Through March 31, 2019 Goal: Provide biomedical researchers with wide variety of high quality, well characterized human tissues to support cancer research Credit for success measured not by banking but by specimens distributed to researchers. Biobanking: Scope > 300 million tissue samples in US Banks at turn of the century. Samples increasing by 20 million/yr Eiseman, E. & Haga, S. Handbook of Human Tissue Sources (RAND, 1999). A 2011 survey of >700 cancer researchers found that 47% had trouble finding samples of sufficient quality, and must limit scope of investigation. Massett, H. A. et al. J. Natl Cancer Inst. Monogr. 2011, 8–15 (2011). Biobanking Benefits Stored samples will be used for the development of products and services that promote public health.
  • A Blockchain Solution for Dynamic Consent in Biobanking

    A Blockchain Solution for Dynamic Consent in Biobanking

    European Journal of Human Genetics (2020) 28:609–626 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-019-0560-9 ARTICLE Dwarna: a blockchain solution for dynamic consent in biobanking 1 1,2,3 1 4 1 Nicholas Mamo ● Gillian M. Martin ● Maria Desira ● Bridget Ellul ● Jean-Paul Ebejer Received: 31 May 2019 / Revised: 13 November 2019 / Accepted: 26 November 2019 / Published online: 16 December 2019 © The Author(s) 2019. This article is published with open access Abstract Dynamic consent aims to empower research partners and facilitate active participation in the research process. Used within the context of biobanking, it gives individuals access to information and control to determine how and where their biospecimens and data should be used. We present Dwarna—a web portal for ‘dynamic consent’ that acts as a hub connecting the different stakeholders of the Malta Biobank: biobank managers, researchers, research partners, and the general public. The portal stores research partners’ consent in a blockchain to create an immutable audit trail of research partners’ consent changes. Dwarna’s structure also presents a solution to the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation’s right to erasure—a right that is seemingly incompatible with the blockchain model. Dwarna’s transparent structure increases trustworthiness in the biobanking process by giving research partners more control over which research studies they participate in, by facilitating the withdrawal of consent and by making it possible to request that the biospecimen 1234567890();,: 1234567890();,: and associated data are destroyed. Introduction alongside links to personal health and lifestyle data to be used by researchers in scientific studies [1].
  • Reflections on Dynamic Consent in Biomedical Research

    Reflections on Dynamic Consent in Biomedical Research

    European Journal of Human Genetics (2021) 29:649–656 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-020-00771-z ARTICLE Reflections on dynamic consent in biomedical research: the story so far 1 2 1,2 Harriet J. A. Teare ● Megan Prictor ● Jane Kaye Received: 16 July 2020 / Revised: 30 September 2020 / Accepted: 22 October 2020 / Published online: 28 November 2020 © The Author(s) 2020. This article is published with open access Abstract Dynamic consent (DC) was originally developed in response to challenges to the informed consent process presented by participants agreeing to ‘future research’ in biobanking. In the past 12 years, it has been trialled in a number of different projects, and examined as a new approach for consent and to support patient engagement over time. There have been significant societal shifts during this time, namely in our reliance on digital tools and the use of social media, as well as a greater appreciation of the integral role of patients in biomedical research. This paper reflects on the development of DC to understand its importance in an age where digital health is becoming the norm and patients require greater oversight and control of how their data may be used in a range of settings. As well as looking back, it looks forwards to consider how DC could be further 1234567890();,: 1234567890();,: utilised to enhance the patient experience and address some of the inequalities caused by the digital divide in society. Introduction digital technologies can support and enhance existing pro- cedures and relationships in healthcare and biomedical Digital health on the whole has been slow to progress research.
  • Your Data, Your Choice: a Design Jam on Modernizing Health Care Consent Models to Unlock Health

    Your Data, Your Choice: a Design Jam on Modernizing Health Care Consent Models to Unlock Health

    Your Data Your Choice A Design Jam on Modernizing Health Care Consent Models to Unlock Health Innovation Holly Etchegary PhD Assistant Professor Faculty of Medicine Memorial University [email protected] Angela Power Director, Data Ethics & Privacy Newfoundland & Labrador Centre for Health Information [email protected] Executive Summary 3 Introduction 5 What We Did 10 What We Found 16 Implications and Future Work 36 In collaboration with Acknowledgements Thank you to the Working Group who worked tirelessly to make the Design Jam a success: Daryl Pullman & Brenda Wilson, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University; Mike Bannister, Donna Roche & Don MacDonald at the Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Health Information; Farah McCrate and Sharon Newman at Eastern Health; Sandra Veenstra & Chandra Kavanagh at the Health Research Ethics Authority; Sarah Wickham at Canada Health Infoway; and, Mandy Woodland from Bounce Innovation & Hacking Health Also, a big thank you to the Privacy team at NLCHI for helping set up for the Design Jam event and to Dr. Charlene Simmonds and Mercy Funded by Dhlakama from the Health Research Unit, Memorial University and Perfect Day for their assistance in preparing this report. Executive Summary Health innovation and research can enhance healthcare and the services offered to patients across Canada. At the same time privacy protections are essential. We want to ensure that individuals maintain control of their information and that patients are willing to continue to participate in the health innovation and research ecosystem. Privacy must be supported as an enabler of innovation, not a barrier to it. This requires a shift in dialogue and an overall innovative approach to a dynamic consent process that ensures transparency and trust are at the heart of new technology and innovation.
  • Contextual Consent: Ethical Mining of Social Media for Health Research

    Contextual Consent: Ethical Mining of Social Media for Health Research

    Contextual Consent: Ethical Mining of Social Media for Health Research Chris Norval Tristan Henderson School of Computer Science School of Computer Science University of St Andrews University of St Andrews St Andrews, Fife, UK St Andrews, Fife, UK [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT college students [24]. Such findings can help researchers and Social media are a rich source of insight for data mining and user- practitioners identify important markers in health and in society. centred research, but the question of consent arises when studying Despite these advantages, those who created the social data in such data without the express knowledge of the creator. Case question are not always informed about the process. While some studies that mine social data from users of online services such as researchers outline clear methods of obtaining informed consent Facebook and Twitter are becoming increasingly common. This when conducting research on social media data (e.g. [24]), only has led to calls for an open discussion into how researchers can around 5% of the literature that use such data describe their consent best use these vast resources to make innovative findings while still procedures [12]. respecting fundamental ethical principles. In this position paper Some have argued that social data posted online are freely we highlight some key considerations for this topic and argue that available for research [9]; however, others argue that just because the conditions of informed consent are often not being met, and personal information is made available online does not mean it that using social media data that some deem free to access and is appropriate to capture and analyse [2, 4, 11, 35].
  • Towards 'Engagement 2.0': Insights from a Study of Dynamic Consent with Biobank Participants

    Towards 'Engagement 2.0': Insights from a Study of Dynamic Consent with Biobank Participants

    Harriet JA Teare, Michael Morrison, Edgar A Whitley and Jane Kaye Towards 'engagement 2.0': insights from a study of dynamic consent with biobank participants Article (Published version) (Refereed) Original citation: Teare, Harriet, Morrison, M., Whitley, Edgar A. and Kaye, Jane (2015) Towards 'engagement 2.0': insights from a study of dynamic consent with biobank participants. Digital Health. ISSN 2055-2076 DOI: 10.1177/2055207615605644 Reuse of this item is permitted through licensing under the Creative Commons: © 2015 The Authors CC BY-NC 3.0 This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/63278/ Available in LSE Research Online: Online: October 2015 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. DIGITAL HEALTH Original Article Digital Health 2015, Vol. 0(0) 1–13 ! The Author(s) 2015 Towards ‘Engagement 2.0’: Insights from a study Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav of dynamic consent with biobank participants DOI: 10.1177/2055207615605644 dhj.sagepub.com Harriet JA Teare1, Michael Morrison1, Edgar A Whitley2 and Jane Kaye1 Abstract Web 2.0 technologies have enabled new methods of engagement, moving from static mono-directional sources of infor- mation to interactive user-led experiences. Use of Web 2.0 technologies for engagement is gaining momentum within the health sector however this is still in its infancy in biobanking research.
  • Adding Dynamic Consent to a Longitudinal Cohort Study: a Qualitative Study of EXCEED Participant Perspectives Susan E

    Adding Dynamic Consent to a Longitudinal Cohort Study: a Qualitative Study of EXCEED Participant Perspectives Susan E

    Wallace and Miola BMC Med Ethics (2021) 22:12 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00583-w RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Adding dynamic consent to a longitudinal cohort study: A qualitative study of EXCEED participant perspectives Susan E. Wallace1* and José Miola2 Abstract Background: Dynamic consent has been proposed as a process through which participants and patients can gain more control over how their data and samples, donated for biomedical research, are used, resulting in greater trust in researchers. It is also a way to respond to evolving data protection frameworks and new legislation. Others argue that the broad consent currently used in biobank research is ethically robust. Little empirical research with cohort study participants has been published. This research investigated the participants’ opinions of adding a dynamic consent interface to their existing study. Methods: Adult participants in the Extended Cohort for E-health, Environment and DNA (EXCEED) longitudinal cohort study who are members of the EXCEED Public and Participant Engagement Group were recruited. Four focus groups were conducted and analysed for thematic content. Discussion topics were derived from a review of the cur- rent literature on dynamic consent. Results: Participants were in favour of many aspects of a dynamic consent interface, such as being able to update their information, add additional data to their records and choose withdrawal options. They were supportive pro- vided it was simple to use and not intrusive. Participants expressed a markedly high level of trust in the study and its investigators and were unanimously happy with their current participation. No strong support was found for adding a dynamic consent interface to EXCEED.
  • Biomedical Big Data: New Models of Control Over Access, Use and Governance

    Biomedical Big Data: New Models of Control Over Access, Use and Governance

    Bioethical Inquiry (2017) 14:501–513 DOI 10.1007/s11673-017-9809-6 SYMPOSIUM: ETHICS AND EPISTEMOLOGY OF BIG DATA Biomedical Big Data: New Models of Control Over Access, Use and Governance Effy Vayena & Alessandro Blasimme Received: 21 March 2017 /Accepted: 24 August 2017 /Published online: 5 October 2017 # The Author(s) 2017. This article is an open access publication Abstract Empirical evidence suggests that while peo- through direct involvement in data governance. We ple hold the capacity to control their data in high regard, conclude by suggesting that, despite the impression that they increasingly experience a loss of control over their biomedical big data diminish individual control, the data in the online world. The capacity to exert control synergistic effect of new data management models can over the generation and flow of personal information is a in fact improve it. fundamental premise to important values such as auton- omy, privacy, and trust. In healthcare and clinical re- Keywords Big Data . Control . Ethics . Privacy. search this capacity is generally achieved indirectly, by Informed consent . Governance agreeing to specific conditions of informational expo- sure. Such conditions can be openly stated in informed consent documents or be implicit in the norms of con- 1. Introduction fidentiality that govern the relationships of patients and healthcare professionals. However, with medicine be- Large reams of data are generated, collected, and proc- coming a data-intense enterprise, informed consent and essed each day for an indefinite variety of purposes. A medical confidentiality, as mechanisms of control, are portion of these data is the output of scientific experi- put under pressure.
  • Research Participants' Perceptions and Views on Consent for Biobank Research: a Review of Empirical Data and Ethical Analysis

    D’Abramo et al. BMC Medical Ethics (2015) 16:60 DOI 10.1186/s12910-015-0053-5 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Research participants’ perceptions and views on consent for biobank research: a review of empirical data and ethical analysis Flavio D’Abramo1,2†, Jan Schildmann1*† and Jochen Vollmann1 Abstract Background: Appropriate information and consent has been one of the most intensely discussed topics within the context of biobank research. In parallel to the normative debate, many socio-empirical studies have been conducted to gather experiences, preferences and views of patients, healthy research participants and further stakeholders. However, there is scarcity of literature which connects the normative debate about justifications for different consent models with findings gained in empirical research. In this paper we discuss findings of a limited review of socio-empirical research on patients’ and healthy research participants’ experiences and views regarding consent to biobank research in light of ethical principles for appropriate information and consent. Methods: Review question: Which empirical data are available on research participants’ perceptions and views regarding information and elicitation of consent for biobank research? Search of articles published till March 1st 2014 in Pubmed. Review of abstracts and potentially relevant full text articles by two authors independently. As categories for content analysis we defined (i) understanding or recall of information, (ii) preferences regarding information or consent, and (iii) research participants’ concerns. Results: The search in Pubmed yielded 337 abstracts of which 10 articles were included in this study. Approaches to information and consent varied considerably across the selected studies. The majority of research participants opted for some version of limited consent when being informed about such possibility.
  • Dynamic Consent: a Possible Solution to Improve Patient Confidence and Trust in How Electronic Patient Records Are Used in Medical Research

    Hawys Williams, Karen Spencer, Caroline Sanders, David Lund, Edgar A Whitley, Jane Kaye, William G Dixon Dynamic consent: a possible solution to improve patient confidence and trust in how electronic patient records are used in medical research Article (Published version) (Refereed) Original citation: Williams, Hawys, Spencer, Karen, Sanders, Caroline, Lund, David, Whitley, Edgar A., Kaye, Jane and Dixon, William G. (2015) Dynamic consent: a possible solution to improve patient confidence and trust in how electronic patient records are used in medical research. JMIR Medical Informatics, 3 (1). e3. ISSN 2291-9694 DOI: 10.2196/medinform.3525 © 2015 The Authors © CC BY 2.0 This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/60754/ Available in LSE Research Online: January 2015 JMIR MEDICAL INFORMATICS Williams et al Viewpoint Dynamic Consent: A Possible Solution to Improve Patient Confidence and Trust in How Electronic Patient Records Are Used in Medical Research Hawys Williams1, PhD; Karen Spencer2, PhD; Caroline Sanders2, PhD; David Lund3, PhD; Edgar A Whitley4, PhD; Jane Kaye5, PhD; William G Dixon1,6, PhD 1Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom 2Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom 3HW Communications, Lancaster, United Kingdom 4Department of Management, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom 5HeLEX - Centre for Health, Law and Emerging Technologies, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom 6Health eResearch Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom Corresponding Author: William G Dixon, PhD Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology University of Manchester Stopford Building Oxford Rd Manchester, M13 9PT United Kingdom Phone: 44 2751642 Fax: 44 2755044 Email: [email protected] Abstract With one million people treated every 36 hours, routinely collected UK National Health Service (NHS) health data has huge potential for medical research.