Teacher Strikes and the Decline of Liberalism, 1968-1981
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ABSTRACT Title of dissertation: “AGAINST THE PUBLIC”: TEACHER STRIKES AND THE DECLINE OF LIBERALISM, 1968-1981 Jon K. Shelton, Doctor of Philosophy, 2013 Dissertation directed by: Professor Julie Greene Department of History In the 1930s, the Democratic Party became the party of working people largely through its support of legislation encouraging the formation of labor unions. As the nation moved leftward, a liberal consensus emerged that placed support—in the name of both economic growth and greater social equality—for labor unions at it center. Support for this labor-liberalism declined considerably during the 1970s, paving the way for the neoliberal conservatism that has emerged in the last quarter century of American politics. This dissertation explains this shift by looking at the intersection between culture and the public sector labor movement in the postwar era. As unionized teachers became increasingly visible in American political culture in the 1960s, lengthy strikes by teachers in major metropolitan areas in the 1970s caused many Americans to question their assumptions about the role of the state and the importance of labor unions. Because of teachers’ long-time cultural importance as providers of economic opportunity as well as inculcators of moral values, their labor stoppages (which were often violations of the law) caused many white working- and middle-class Americans to blame the excesses of the liberal state for moral decline and to re-think their views about what had made America so prosperous in the years following World War II. Further, the state’s failure to solve the thorny problem of teachers shutting down the school system also caused many of these future “Reagan Democrats” to question the efficacy of the liberal state. With labor- liberalism discredited, free-market conservatives began, by the end of the decade, to argue persuasively for a shift to a more austere state, less government regulation of business, and for the privatization of social goods like education. This dissertation charts these larger developments by putting close examinations of teacher strikes in Newark, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Baltimore, and St. Louis in dialogue with the national trajectory of neoliberal conservatism. Against the Public: Teacher Strikes and the Decline of Liberalism, 1968- 1981 by Jon K. Shelton Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, College Park, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2013 Advisory Committee: Professor Julie Greene (advisor) Associate Professor Saverio Giovacchini Associate Professor Robyn Muncy Associate Professor David Freund Professor Jennifer King Rice ©Copyright by Jon K Shelton 2013 ii Acknowledgments During the laborious brick-by-brick process of constructing a dissertation, the research and writing can often seem like a singularly solitary endeavor, but as I look back on the process, it strikes me just how profoundly this project relied on the critical contributions of friends, colleagues, and mentors. First, I would like to thank the University of Maryland History Department, the University of Maryland Graduate School, and the Spencer Foundation/National Academy of Education for the funds to support archival research and to write, and most importantly, for the great privilege in these times of austerity of being able to spend a great deal of time devoted to what should be the quintessence of every human’s existence—systematic thought. Archivists and librarians in many different cities proved to be extremely helpful in finding the materials I needed to undertake this research, and, as is any historian who has ever written anything of even the most modest contribution to the field, I am greatly indebted to the many people who worked hard to help me. Thanks to the archivists at the Library of Congress, the State of Pennsylvania Archives, the Urban Archives at Temple University, the City Archives in Philadelphia, the Philadelphia Free Public Library, the Baltimore City Archives, the New York City Municipal Archives, the Wagner Labor Archives, the Heinz Historical Center Archives, the Missouri Historical Society, the Television News Archive, and the Reuther Archives. I owe a special debt of gratitude to Dan Golodner, the AFT Collection archivist at Reuther, who went out of his way to help iii me work through the materials there in a short time in addition to showing me unprocessed materials that proved to be very important. During my M.A. work at the University of Colorado, I was blessed with several great teachers at a formative stage of my academic career. Peter Boag, Ralph Mann, Mark Pittenger, and Francisco Barbosa were especially important, and I thank them. My colleagues Nate Matlock and Colin Church not only contributed much to my intellectual development, but as friends, they were and are without parallel. I would also like to thank the many smart people who have commented on my work at various conferences over the years, especially Jefferson Cowie and Jennifer Burns, for valuable insights. Thanks also to the mentors and colleagues whom I have been privileged to meet through the National Academy of Education for helpful advice on both the dissertation and the larger pursuit of an academic career; in particular, I thank Maris Vinovskis, Ruben Donato, Bill Reese, and Robbie Gross. At Maryland, I would like to acknowledge the fantastic mentors I have had in David Sartorius, Clare Lyons, James Gilbert, and Ira Berlin. Though it is all I have to offer, thanks alone are not sufficient to express my gratitude for the efforts of my dissertation committee members Jennifer King Rice, Robyn Muncy, David Freund, and Saverio Giovacchini. Robyn asked crucial questions at a really key moment in this project’s development, while David challenged me early on to think in new ways about what I was trying to accomplish here, and this is a much better dissertation as a result. Saverio has been a special mentor, insightful reader of my work, and friend, and I thank him for his encouragement. Fellow graduate students at Maryland have also provided engaging intellectual discussions and valuable critiques of my research. Thanks to Josh iv Bearden, Rob Bland, Tess Bundy, Will Burghart, Jon Franklin, Paul Gibson, Reid Gustafson, Harrison Guthorn, Robert Henderson, Steph Hinnershitz, Melissa Kravetz, Christina Larocco, Peter Libero, Lejnar Mitrojorgji, Mary-Elizabeth Murphy, and Lane Windham. I would like to offer a special acknowledgment to Stephen Duncan and Dan Richter who have generously read my work and, more importantly, offered needed comradeship. It is almost impossible to put into words what Julie Greene has meant as an advisor. Not only has Julie pushed me every step of the way to produce a better dissertation, she has done so with a rare combination of intellect and kindness, patiently reading everything from chapter drafts to fellowship proposals and never making me feel as though I imposed too much on her own time (though I probably did). I would not have done this without Julie as an advisor; she is a great historian but an even better human being. I would like to thank my family and the Sandherr family—especially Keith Shelton and Tom and Tina Sandherr—for unyielding support over the long time it took to finish this project. In spite of my initial fears, my two children—Sara and Keith— actually made the task of writing a dissertation easier since finishing the day’s work more quickly meant more time to spend with them in the evening. Finally, to Kristina, who has been my most profound supporter, this dissertation is dedicated to you. Though it is not much of a tribute, I hope it is at least in some small measure worthy of someone who continues to amaze me in new ways every day. v Table of Contents Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................................... ii Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1: “A New Era of Labor Relations”: Liberal Labor Policy and the Seeds of Discontent, 1968-71 .......................................................................................................................................... 55 Pittsburgh Teachers and Public Employee Act 195 .............................................................. 58 Act 195 in Action: Philadelphia and Pittsburgh .................................................................... 74 Ugly and Bitter: The Newark Strikes of 1970-71 .................................................................. 88 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................... 103 Chapter 2: Letters to the Essex County Penitentiary: David Selden and the Fracturing of America ..................................................................................................................................................... 109 The Newark Strike and Selden: Empty Vessels .................................................................. 111 The Selden Letters and the Public Image of Labor Unions ................................................. 120 Teacher Strikes and the Decline of Law and Order ............................................................. 132 Alienated Individuals, Re-Appropriating Narratives ..........................................................