Verification Report – 2019 Greenhouse Gas and Sustainability Data Assertions General Motors Company – Global Facilities

July 10, 2020

Prepared for:

General Motors Company 30400 Van Dyke Avenue Warren, MI 48093

Prepared by:

Stantec Consulting Ltd. 300 Hagey Blvd #100 Waterloo, ON N2L 0A4

Job No.: 160900942

VERIFICATION REPORT – 2019 GREENHOUSE GAS AND SUSTAINABILITY DATA ASSERTIONS GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY – GLOBAL FACILITIES

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...... I

1.0 INTRODUCTION ...... 1

2.0 VERIFICATION FUNDAMENTALS ...... 2 2.1 VERIFICATION SCOPE ...... 3

3.0 VERIFICATION ACTIVITIES ...... 7 3.1 VERIFICATION PLANNING AND DESKTOP REVIEW ...... 7 3.2 TELECONFERENCE IN LIEU OF SITE VISIT ...... 7 3.3 RECORDS REVIEW ...... 7 3.4 REPORTING AND CLOSE OUT ...... 7

4.0 VERIFICATION TEAM: QUALIFICATIONS, ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES...... 8 4.1 VERIFICATION TEAM ...... 8

5.0 VERIFICATION RISK ...... 9

6.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ...... 10 6.1 DISCREPANCIES ...... 28

7.0 CONCLUSION ...... 30

8.0 CLOSURE ...... 31

LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Verification Fundamentals ...... 2 Table 2 Verification Scope ...... 3 Table 3 GM Global Facilities – 2019 Assertions ...... 4 Table 4 Verification Team ...... 8 Table 5 Sampling Plan and Results – General Procedures ...... 10 Table 6 Sampling Plan and Results – Scope 1 Direct GHG Emissions ...... 14 Table 7 Sampling Plan and Results – Scope 2 Indirect Emissions and Renewables ...... 16 Table 8 Sampling Plan and Results – Select Scope 3 (Categories 3, 6, 11) ...... 17 Table 9 Sampling Plan and Results – Energy Use ...... 19 Table 10 Sampling Plan and Results – Water ...... 20 Table 11 Sampling Plan and Results – Waste ...... 21 Table 12 Sampling Plan and Results – Production ...... 22 Table 13 Sampling Plan and Results – GRI 305 Emissions ...... 22 Table 14 Sampling Plan and Results – GRI 302 Energy ...... 24 Table 15 Sampling Plan and Results – GRI 303 Water ...... 25 Table 16 Sampling Plan and Results – GRI 306 Waste ...... 25 Table 17 Sampling Plan and Results – Year over Year Performance ...... 26 Table 18 List of Discrepancies Identified During Verification Activities ...... 28

VERIFICATION REPORT – 2019 GREENHOUSE GAS AND SUSTAINABILITY DATA ASSERTIONS GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY – GLOBAL FACILITIES

LIST OF APPENDICES

APPENDIX A LIST OF EXCLUDED FACILITIES

APPENDIX B INITIAL VERIFICATION AND SAMPLING PLAN

APPENDIX C VERIFICATION STATEMENT

VERIFICATION REPORT – 2019 GREENHOUSE GAS AND SUSTAINABILITY DATA ASSERTIONS GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY – GLOBAL FACILITIES

Executive Summary

Stantec Consulting Ltd. (Stantec) was contracted by General Motors Company (GM) to conduct an independent third-party verification of a selection of greenhouse gas (GHG) and sustainability data assertions (the Assertions) for their Global Facilities, including:

• Total Scope 1, 2, and select Scope 3 GHG emissions • Total energy consumption (including renewables) • Total water withdrawal • Total waste and waste per vehicle produced • Total production • Year over year performance • Renewable electricity use • Landfill-free facilities

GM Global reports on these assertions under the following voluntary programs (the Reporting Programs):

• The Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) • The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)

In this work, GM was responsible for the collection of activity data used in the calculations, data management, completion of the calculations, and preparation of the report that contains the Assertions. Stantec was responsible for completing the verification to a limited level of assurance.

Based on the processes and procedures completed, there is no evidence that GM’s stated Assertions for the 2019 calendar year are not, in all material respects, fairly stated in accordance with the criteria noted herein.

The final Verification and Sampling Plan, results and identified discrepancies are summarized in this report.

i

VERIFICATION REPORT – 2019 GREENHOUSE GAS AND SUSTAINABILITY DATA ASSERTIONS GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY – GLOBAL FACILITIES

Introduction July 10, 2020

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Stantec Consulting Ltd. (Stantec) was contracted by General Motors Company (GM) to conduct an independent third-party verification of a selection of greenhouse gas (GHG) and sustainability data assertions (the Assertions) for their Global Facilities, including:

• Total Scope 1, 2, and select Scope 3 GHG emissions • Total energy consumption (including renewables) • Total water withdrawal • Total waste and waste per vehicle produced • Total production • Year over year performance • Renewable electricity use • Landfill-free facilities

GM Global reports on these assertions under the following voluntary programs (the Reporting Programs):

• The Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) • The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)

The GM global facilities are located in various regions around the world and operate under the following operational boundaries: GM International Operations (GMIO), GM South America (GMSA), and GM North America (GMNA). GM does not include all facilities in the reporting boundary. A subset of these facilities has been excluded from the Assertions and these exclusions have been transparently disclosed in Appendix A.

In this work, GM was responsible for the collection of activity data used in the calculations, data management, completion of the calculations, and preparation of the report that contains the Assertions.

Stantec was responsible for planning and executing the verification to deliver an opinion to a limited level of assurance as to whether the Assertions are presented fairly and in accordance with the Verification Criteria. Stantec is accredited with the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), a member of the International Accreditation Forum (IAF), in accordance with ISO 14065 (Accreditation ID #0805 issued to Stantec Consulting Ltd. for GHG verification and validation).

W:\General_Motors_Global_160900942_2019\6_val_ver_statement (report)\rpt_final\2019\rpt_fnl_2019_gm_global_20200710.docx 1

VERIFICATION REPORT – 2019 GREENHOUSE GAS AND SUSTAINABILITY DATA ASSERTIONS GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY – GLOBAL FACILITIES

Verification Fundamentals July 10, 2020

2.0 VERIFICATION FUNDAMENTALS

The verification objectives, criteria, standards, level of assurance, materiality threshold, and period are presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Verification Fundamentals

Parameter Description Intended User The results of the verification will be used by GM for internal and external sustainability reporting, and for reporting to CDP and GRI. The users of the Verification Report and statement are GM, shareholders and the public. Verification The objective of the verification is to assess whether the Assertions for GM’s 2019 Objectives operations are accurate and prepared in accordance with appropriate criteria. Verification The boundaries of the verification include GM owned and operated facilities within Boundaries General Motors North America (GMNA), General Motors South America (GMSA) and General Motors International Operations (GMIO). A subset of these facilities has been excluded from the Assertions and these exclusions have been transparently disclosed in Appendix A. Reporting Period The verification is being conducted for the period of January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019. Verification • ISO 14064 Greenhouses Gases – Part 1: Specification with guidance at the Criteria organization level for quantification and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions and removals, 2006; • World Resources Institute (WRI)/World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (Revised Edition), March 2004; • WRI/WBCSD, Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and Reporting Standard; • WRI/WBCSD, GHG Protocol Scope 2 Guidance: An Amendment to the GHG Corporate Standard; • CDP Guidance for the 2019 reporting year (CDP Guidance); and • GRI Sustainability Reporting Guidelines (2011). Verification The verification is being conducted in accordance with ISO14064:3, the AA1000 Standards AccountAbility Principles Standard (2008) and Stantec’s Standard Operating Procedures developed for accreditation to ISO 14065. Level of Limited Assurance Materiality Following best practice, the quantitative materiality threshold has been set at 5%. Threshold The aggregate total of individual discrepancies (understatements and overstatements of total reported values) is compared against the 5% materiality threshold within each scope. The materiality of qualitative discrepancies are at the discretion of the Verification Body.

W:\General_Motors_Global_160900942_2019\6_val_ver_statement (report)\rpt_final\2019\rpt_fnl_2019_gm_global_20200710.docx 2

VERIFICATION REPORT – 2019 GREENHOUSE GAS AND SUSTAINABILITY DATA ASSERTIONS GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY – GLOBAL FACILITIES

Verification Fundamentals July 10, 2020

2.1 VERIFICATION SCOPE

The Verification Scope and Assertions, under GM’s global operations reporting boundary, are subject to verification by Stantec. The Verification Scope is presented in Table 2.

Table 2 Verification Scope

Area Metric CDP GHG and • Scope 1 Direct GHG Emissions and Energy Use Energy • Scope 2 Indirect GHG Emissions and Energy Use Reporting • Scope 3 Other Indirect GHG Emissions and Energy Use: Metrics (carbon − Fuel and energy related activities not included in Scopes 1 or 2 (Category dioxide 3) equivalent, CO2e − Business travel, air travel only (Category 6) and MWh) − Use of sold products (Category 11) Other Reporting • Total volume of water withdrawals by source, volumes recycled, and Metrics discharges (m3) • Year over year performance (2019 vs. 2018 for global energy, water & GHG emissions, waste per vehicle) (%) • Total vehicles produced • Total waste • Total waste per vehicle produced • Renewable Energy Assertions: − Total renewable electricity use (MWh) − Total GHG reductions applied due to renewable energy use (CO2e) − Percentage renewable electricity use compared to total electricity use (%) • Number of landfill-free facilities (total) GRI Reporting • GRI 302-1 Total Energy Use Metrics • GRI 303-1 Total Water Use • GRI 305-1 Total Scope 1 GHG emissions − 305-2 Total Scope 2 GHG emissions − 305-3 Total Scope 3 GHG emissions (Select Categories) − 305-7 Nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur oxides (SOx), and other significant air emissions) • GRI 306 – Effluents and Waste − 306-2 Total Waste

W:\General_Motors_Global_160900942_2019\6_val_ver_statement (report)\rpt_final\2019\rpt_fnl_2019_gm_global_20200710.docx 3

VERIFICATION REPORT – 2019 GREENHOUSE GAS AND SUSTAINABILITY DATA ASSERTIONS GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY – GLOBAL FACILITIES

Verification Fundamentals July 10, 2020

The Assertions are provided in Table 3.

Table 3 GM Global Facilities – 2019 Assertions

Parameter Assertion Units Notes Metric tonnes of carbon dioxide Scope 1 GHG Emissions - Total 1,589,700 - equivalent (tCO2e) Scope 2 GHG Emissions (Location - 4,381,970 tCO2e Based)

Scope 2 GHG Emissions (Market - 3,721,875 tCO2e Based)

Scope 3 GHG Emissions Fuel & Energy not in Scope 1 & 2 322,403 tCO2e - (Category 3)

Scope 3 GHG Emissions Business 40,051 tCO2e Air travel only Travel, Air (Category 6)

Includes emissions from Scope 3 GHG Emissions Use of 190,123,729 tCO2e vehicle travel and Sold Product (Category 11) air conditioning systems

Total Energy Use 15,650,685 MWh - Total Water Use 31,254,916 m3 - Does not include waste from Total Waste 1,770,387 metric tonnes construction, demolition and remediation

Waste per Vehicle Produced 222 kg per vehicle -

Total renewable electricity 1,636,792 MWh -

Total electricity use 7,478,378 MWh -

Renewable electricity as a 21.9% % - percentage of total electricity use

Total GHG reductions applied due 660,094 tCO2e - to renewable electricity use

Number of landfill-free facilities 94 # Facilities -

W:\General_Motors_Global_160900942_2019\6_val_ver_statement (report)\rpt_final\2019\rpt_fnl_2019_gm_global_20200710.docx 4

VERIFICATION REPORT – 2019 GREENHOUSE GAS AND SUSTAINABILITY DATA ASSERTIONS GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY – GLOBAL FACILITIES

Verification Fundamentals July 10, 2020

Parameter Assertion Units Notes Year Over Year Performance Scope 1 & 2 GHG emissions Location-Based -14.2 % (negative value represents (Scopes 1 & 2) decrease) Year Over Year Performance Total Energy Use -9.9 % Scopes 1 & 2 (negative value represents decrease) Year Over Year Performance Total Water Use -14.5 % - (negative value represents decrease) Year Over Year Performance M-Schedule Vehicles Produced -15.4 % (saleable (negative value represents vehicles) decrease) Year Over Year Performance Waste per Vehicle -0.9 % - (negative value represents decrease)

GRI 302-1 Total Energy Use 15,650,685 MWh -

GRI 303-1 Total Water Use 31,254,916 m3 -

GRI 305-1 Total Scope 1 GHG 1,589,700 tCO2e - Emissions

GRI 305-2 Total Scope 2 GHG 4,381,970 tCO2e Location-Based Emissions

Category 6 is air travel only. Category 3: 322,403 Category 11 GRI 305-3 Total Scope 3 GHG Category 6: 40,051 includes tCO2e Emissions Category 11: emissions from 190,123,729 vehicle travel and air conditioning systems

Does not include GRI 305-7 NOx, SOx and other SOx (as SO2): 0.03 thousand metric combustion of significant air emissions tonnes NOx: 11.5 mobile fuels

W:\General_Motors_Global_160900942_2019\6_val_ver_statement (report)\rpt_final\2019\rpt_fnl_2019_gm_global_20200710.docx 5

VERIFICATION REPORT – 2019 GREENHOUSE GAS AND SUSTAINABILITY DATA ASSERTIONS GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY – GLOBAL FACILITIES

Verification Fundamentals July 10, 2020

Parameter Assertion Units Notes

Does not include GRI 306-2 Total Waste waste from (excluding construction, demolition 1,770,387 metric tonnes construction, and remediation) demolition and remediation

M-Schedule Production 7,332,373 # Vehicles (saleable vehicles)

W:\General_Motors_Global_160900942_2019\6_val_ver_statement (report)\rpt_final\2019\rpt_fnl_2019_gm_global_20200710.docx 6

VERIFICATION REPORT – 2019 GREENHOUSE GAS AND SUSTAINABILITY DATA ASSERTIONS GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY – GLOBAL FACILITIES

Verification Activities July 10, 2020

3.0 VERIFICATION ACTIVITIES

3.1 VERIFICATION PLANNING AND DESKTOP REVIEW

Once Stantec was provided with GM’s documentation, a desktop review of the Assertions, reporting data, and supporting documentation was conducted. From this review, a preliminary risk assessment was conducted and summarized in the Verification and Sampling Plan. A detailed Verification and Sampling Plan was developed based on the outcome of the preliminary risk assessment. The initial Verification and Sampling Plan (Appendix B) was provided to GM on May 14, 2020 and included a list of additional documentation required from GM to complete the verification. Verification and sampling procedures, including the risk assessment and sample size, were updated throughout the course of the verification. The final sampling plan is outlined along with the final results in Section 6.0 (Summary of Findings) of this report.

3.2 TELECONFERENCE IN LIEU OF SITE VISIT

Since there was no planned site or office visit, following the desktop review, Stantec held teleconference calls with GM. The purpose of the calls was to provide an opportunity for Stantec to conduct verification procedures with GM staff that were involved with the collection and compilation of data and quantification of the Assertions, as well as to review GM’s data collection systems. Stantec also assessed consistency with the program requirements and previous year’s Assertions and appropriateness of the methods applied. Gizem Gunal-Akgol led the teleconferences on behalf of Stantec.

3.3 RECORDS REVIEW

The verification team reviewed, recalculated, and re-aggregated data where deemed necessary, and reviewed the calculation methodologies for consistency with the program requirements. Stantec reviewed supporting documentation and records for those identified sources considered to be potentially material. The quality management protocol applied to data streams was also reviewed.

3.4 REPORTING AND CLOSE OUT

Upon completion of the tasks described above, Stantec summarized the initial findings and completed an internal peer review and quality management assessment of our work. A Draft Verification Report was prepared to present the verification findings to GM.

GM was provided with the opportunity to address discrepancies identified during the course of the verification prior to finalizing the report.

W:\General_Motors_Global_160900942_2019\6_val_ver_statement (report)\rpt_final\2019\rpt_fnl_2019_gm_global_20200710.docx 7

VERIFICATION REPORT – 2019 GREENHOUSE GAS AND SUSTAINABILITY DATA ASSERTIONS GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY – GLOBAL FACILITIES

Verification Team: Qualifications, Roles and Responsibilities July 10, 2020

4.0 VERIFICATION TEAM: QUALIFICATIONS, ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

4.1 VERIFICATION TEAM

The members of the Verification Team are identified in Table 4.

Table 4 Verification Team

Name Role Responsibilities Gizem oversaw the completion of the procedures and deliverables and issued the verification statements. She led Gizem Gunal- Lead Verifier the teleconference and undertook all project management Akgol, P.Eng. duties using Stantec’s 10-point project management framework. Nicole reviewed all deliverables for technical soundness and Nicole Flanagan. Quality compliance with Stantec’s standard operating procedures and M.A.Sc., P.Eng. Reviewer the verification criteria. Dan reviewed verification documentation to confirm all verification activities have been completed and are sufficient Daniel Hegg, Independent for the required level of assurance. He independently M.Sc., CEM Peer Reviewer concluded on whether the Assertions are materially correct as the independent peer reviewer in accordance with ISO 14064- 3 and ISO 14065 Catherine Catherine executed the verification plan during the desktop MacFarlane, Verifier review as well as prepared the draft and final Verification M.A.Sc. Report.

Note that Omid Tayeba was identified as a verifier for this verification but did not participate in any verification activities.

Each member of the Stantec Verification Team has the required technical knowledge of GHG emissions quantification methodologies and substantial experience in the completion of emissions inventories for any number of pollutants. All Verification Team members have completed the CSA training on ISO 14064-3 GHG Verifications as well as meet Stantec’s CDP/GRI competency requirements. The members also have experience in completing third party reviews and audits in connection with emission inventories. Profiles for the team members are presented in the Verification Plan (Appendix B of this Verification Report).

W:\General_Motors_Global_160900942_2019\6_val_ver_statement (report)\rpt_final\2019\rpt_fnl_2019_gm_global_20200710.docx 8

VERIFICATION REPORT – 2019 GREENHOUSE GAS AND SUSTAINABILITY DATA ASSERTIONS GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY – GLOBAL FACILITIES

Verification Risk July 10, 2020

5.0 VERIFICATION RISK

The verification team assesses the overall verification risk and determines whether the risks are material and have been appropriately disclosed. The verification team will assess risk throughout the verification and adjust our sampling plan as required to meet the assurance requirements of the verification and maintain an acceptable level of risk.

Overall risk assessment is a process conducted by the Stantec verification team based on an assessment of inherent risk, control risk, and detection risk. In this case, the preliminary overall risk has been assessed as medium1, based on our preliminary assessment. The rationale for the assessment of overall risk is provided in the following sections.

1 Possible risk ratings are “high”, “medium” and “low”. These are based on inherent, control and detection risks as evaluated by the project team prior to engaging in verification activities.

W:\General_Motors_Global_160900942_2019\6_val_ver_statement (report)\rpt_final\2019\rpt_fnl_2019_gm_global_20200710.docx 9

VERIFICATION REPORT – 2019 GREENHOUSE GAS AND SUSTAINABILITY DATA ASSERTIONS GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY – GLOBAL FACILITIES

Summary of Findings July 10, 2020

6.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

A summary of the key findings from this verification are shown in Tables 5-17.

Table 5 Sampling Plan and Results – General Procedures

Item Number Criteria Verification Procedures Findings 1. Assess the environmental information system and its Desktop Assessment Overall Findings controls for potential sources of error, omissions and Satisfactory – the environmental and other data information misrepresentations. (p.9 ISO 14064-3) n/a systems and their controls are appropriate for their use Consider: (GM2100, GMR2 and data management system used for Site Visit Procedures • Selection and management of data and information; Scope 3). • Processes for collecting, processing, consolidating and SVP1 – Ask the following questions during the reporting data and information; teleconference about the GM2100 data system (for GHG, • Systems and processes that ensure the accuracy; energy, water): • Design and maintenance of the information system; 1. How is data collected, processed, and consolidated • Systems and processes that support the information into the GM2100 system? Are the same processes system; used across GMNA, GMIO, and GMSA? Are the • Results of previous assessments if available and same processes used for invoiced and metered data? appropriate. 2. What systems and process are in place to ensure Does the system track all GHG emissions from all source data is accurately entered into GM2100. Explain the types? Are there several GHG systems in place? QAQC. 3. What if an invoice or metered data is missing? Is there a backfilling procedure? 4. Who is responsible for the data within GM2100 (emission factors, HHV, references, etc.) 5. Who actually performs updates to data in GM2100 (emission factors, references, etc.) 6. Is access to GM2100 restricted? Who has access? Is access password protected SVP2 – Ask similar questions (SVP1) about the GMR2 data system (for waste only)

W:\General_Motors_Global_160900942_2019\6_val_ver_statement (report)\rpt_final\2019\rpt_fnl_2019_gm_global_20200710.docx 10

VERIFICATION REPORT – 2019 GREENHOUSE GAS AND SUSTAINABILITY DATA ASSERTIONS GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY – GLOBAL FACILITIES

Summary of Findings July 10, 2020

Item Number Criteria Verification Procedures Findings SVP3 – Assess whether the data management system used for capital and purchased goods spending for Scope 3 emissions is appropriately vetted 2. Are documents generated to support the GHG information Desktop Assessment Procedures Overall Findings system (e.g., manuals, audit reports, calibration n/a Satisfactory – Data retention procedures are sufficient. certificates) created and retained at the facility? How long is this information retained for, and where is it kept? Site Visit Procedures SVP1 – Discuss data retention procedures.

3. Determine whether an appropriate protocol/criteria was Desktop Assessment Procedures Overall Findings used for the GHG assertion. DAP1 – Determine if GM has followed an appropriate Satisfactory – Appropriate protocol and criteria were used protocol for quantifying GHG emissions (check their to determine the environmental assertions. inventory management plan, or quantification methodology document). DAP2 – Determine whether a consistent and appropriate set of GWPs were used for GHG assertions.

Site Visit Procedures n/a 4. Has the Member reported all emissions and data within the Desktop Assessment Procedures Overall Findings established boundary or excluded GHG / activities been DAP1 – Review GM’s established boundary, and Satisfactory – The established boundary includes sufficiently documented (rationale & transparency)? determine whether all emissions and data within the appropriate sources for: Has the verification team been provided with evidence to boundary have been included, and whether excluded • Scope 1 GHG emissions support the assertion that the reporting boundary is GHGs/activities have been sufficiently documented. • complete or appropriately excluded (sources)? Scope 2 GHG emissions Site Visit Procedures • Scope 3 emissions (select categories) • Energy use n/a • Water use • Waste, with the transparent exclusion of waste from construction, demolition and remediation activities • Renewable Energy Assertions

W:\General_Motors_Global_160900942_2019\6_val_ver_statement (report)\rpt_final\2019\rpt_fnl_2019_gm_global_20200710.docx 11

VERIFICATION REPORT – 2019 GREENHOUSE GAS AND SUSTAINABILITY DATA ASSERTIONS GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY – GLOBAL FACILITIES

Summary of Findings July 10, 2020

Item Number Criteria Verification Procedures Findings • Landfill free facilities • NOx/SOx • Production

5. Has the Reporter reported emissions of all six GHGs (CO2, Desktop Assessment Procedures Overall Findings CH4, N2O, SF6, PFCs, HFCs,) reported emissions DAP1 – Determine if GM has reported emissions of all six Satisfactory – CO2, CH4, N2O, SF6, PFCs and HFCs have separately in appropriate units (i.e. tonnes or tons)? GHGs (review calculation spreadsheet). been included in the emissions calculations in Scopes 1, 2 & 3 categories as applicable. Site Visit Procedures

n/a 6. Has the Reporter broken down its Scope 1 and Scope 2 Desktop Assessment Procedures Overall Findings emissions by facility (at a minimum), and have all Scope 1 DAP1 – Review the calculation spreadsheets to Satisfactory – Scopes 1 and 2 emissions are calculated at emissions been broken down by source type? determine whether emissions have been broken down by the appropriate level of detail. scope and source type.

Site Visit Procedures n/a 7. Have any mergers, acquisitions, or divestitures occurred Desktop Assessment Procedures Overall Findings during the current emissions year? DAP8 – Review the provided documentation and search Satisfactory – No significant mergers, acquisitions or Further, has the entity insourced (acquired) or outsourced online to determine if any mergers, acquisitions, or divestitures occurred in the 2019 reporting period. (contracted out) any facilities? divestitures occurred in 2019. Does the Reporter have a base year emissions recalculation policy that articulates the basis and context for base year recalculation? Has the Reporter reviewed the policy based on changes. Site Visit Procedures Discuss with GM whether there have been any mergers or acquisitions in 2019. 8. Desktop Assessment Procedures Overall Findings n/a Not applicable – GM does not use equity share approach.

W:\General_Motors_Global_160900942_2019\6_val_ver_statement (report)\rpt_final\2019\rpt_fnl_2019_gm_global_20200710.docx 12

VERIFICATION REPORT – 2019 GREENHOUSE GAS AND SUSTAINABILITY DATA ASSERTIONS GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY – GLOBAL FACILITIES

Summary of Findings July 10, 2020

Item Number Criteria Verification Procedures Findings For Reporter’s using the equity share approach, does the Site Visit Procedures emission report include all processes and facilities for SVP1 - Confirm the approach used for the verification – which the Reporter holds an equity share? operational control or financial control? 9. For Reporter’s using the operational control approach, Desktop Assessment Procedures Overall Findings does the emission report include all processes and n/a Satisfactory – GM bases its environmental reporting on facilities under the operational control of the Reporter? operational control parameters, and excludes facilities Site Visit Procedures accordingly. A list of excluded facilities is provided in SVP1 – Discuss with GM how facilities are included or Appendix A for transparency. excluded from reporting. How does GM keep this list up to date and how are the impact of excluding these emissions assessed? 10. If the Entity has leased assets have emissions been Desktop Assessment Procedures Overall Findings correctly included or excluded from the boundary? n/a Satisfactory – leased assets have been appropriately Finance or capital lease = report emissions included in the boundary. Site Visit Procedures Operating lease = only if operational control boundary is chosen. SVP1 - How has GM dealt with leased properties? Does GM have a policy with regard to how environmental metrics from leased properties are included or excluded from the reporting boundary?

W:\General_Motors_Global_160900942_2019\6_val_ver_statement (report)\rpt_final\2019\rpt_fnl_2019_gm_global_20200710.docx 13

VERIFICATION REPORT – 2019 GREENHOUSE GAS AND SUSTAINABILITY DATA ASSERTIONS GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY – GLOBAL FACILITIES

Summary of Findings July 10, 2020

Table 6 Sampling Plan and Results – Scope 1 Direct GHG Emissions

Item Number Criteria Verification Procedures Findings 1. With respect to emissions from direct sources, has the Desktop Assessment Procedures Overall Findings member appropriately calculated direct emissions? DAP1 – Identify from provided spreadsheets how the DF1 - Satisfactory - The methodology for calculating direct • Is there sufficient and appropriate information to emissions are being calculated and determine if the emissions was identified and it is reasonable. support the justification for the use of the methodology is reasonable. DF2 – Satisfactory - The natural gas emissions were methodology? (i.e., has the reporter met the DAP2 - Recalculate natural gas combustion emissions successfully recalculated. requirements to use the methodology?) for all facilities with natural gas consumption reported. • Does the methodology deployed result in the most DF3 – Satisfactory – The emissions from oil, diesel, LPG Emissions from natural gas make up more than 90% of and Landfill gas are calculated correctly and are conservative GHG assertion? Assess how the member the total Scope 1 emissions. calculated direct emissions and assess if the method reasonable for their respective volumes. applied is appropriate. DAP3 – Check that emissions from sources that are less DF4 – Immaterial quantitative discrepancy of 0.005% of than 0.5% of the total Scope 1 emissions are reasonable. • Have the calculations been performed correctly (i.e., Scope 1 & 2 emissions (over reported). Stantec recalculate the emissions and compare)? DAP4 - Review model used for calculating emissions recalculated emissions and identified a difference between from mobile fuels. Emissions from mobile fuels make up recalculated quantity and assertion quantity of 275 t CO2e. 10% of the total Scope 1 emissions. DF5 – Satisfactory – The emissions from refrigerant use DAP5 - Review model used for calculating emissions onsite are correctly calculated. from refrigerants. Emissions from refrigerants make up DF6 - Satisfactory – total Scope 1 emissions are accurately 2% of the total Scope 1 emissions. aggregated and reported. DAP6 – Reaggregate total Scope 1 emissions and check against final reported value.

Site Visit Procedures n/a 2. Are inputs into the Scope 1 – Direct Emissions calculations Desktop Assessment Procedures Overall Findings supported with sufficient and appropriate evidence (i.e., DAP1 – Trace natural gas invoices (3 months per year) DF1 – Satisfactory with Immaterial Discrepancy of 0.05% of sufficient and adequate documentation)? for the facilities that collectively make up approximately total Scope 1 & 2 emissions (under reported). Emissions Examples of things to check: 50% of natural gas emissions, for comparison to the total from natural gas combustion are supported by invoices but • Invoiced/Metered fuel consumption volumes – are reported quantity. for immaterial differences in volumes at three facilities spreadsheet data supported by on-site data? DAP2 – Confirm that the invoices sampled in above are (approximately 2,763 tCO2e). within 2019.

W:\General_Motors_Global_160900942_2019\6_val_ver_statement (report)\rpt_final\2019\rpt_fnl_2019_gm_global_20200710.docx 14

VERIFICATION REPORT – 2019 GREENHOUSE GAS AND SUSTAINABILITY DATA ASSERTIONS GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY – GLOBAL FACILITIES

Summary of Findings July 10, 2020

Item Number Criteria Verification Procedures Findings • Are the emission factors and methodology used in the DAP3 – Trace source of mobile fuel data. DF2 – Satisfactory - direct emissions were calculated using GHG assertion accurate (i.e., up-to-date)? DAP4 – Trace source of refrigerant data and sample as 2019 data. • Any other activity data used is supported by the appropriate (number of months to be determined). DF3 – Satisfactory with immaterial quantitative discrepancy Entity’s system; DAP5 – Assess whether the natural gas HHVs are of not more than 0.4% on Scope 1 and 2 emissions due to reasonable. use of average annual cost of fuel to determine quantity of fuel used in mobile emissions (Maximum of 21,556 t CO2e). DAP6 – Assess whether the emission factors are reasonable for natural gas. DF4 – Satisfactory – emissions of refrigerant are supported from a reasonable source. DAP7 – Assess whether mobile fuel HHVs are reasonable. DF5 – Satisfactory – HHVs for natural gas are appropriate for their regions. DAP8 – Assess whether mobile fuel EFs are reasonable. DF6 – Satisfactory – EFs for natural gas are appropriate for DAP9 – Assess whether refrigerant GWPs are their regions. reasonable. DF7 – NA DAP10 - Assess whether all facilities are included within reporting boundary for mobile and refrigerant emissions. DF8 – See discrepancy under DF3. DAP11 - Assess whether quantification and aggregation DF9 – Satisfactory – GWPs used for refrigerants are methodologies are consistent with previous periods. appropriate. DF10 – Satisfactory – the appropriate facilities have been included within the boundary for verified quantities. Site Visit Procedures DF11 - Satisfactory – Quantification and aggregation n/a methodologies are consistent with the previous period.

W:\General_Motors_Global_160900942_2019\6_val_ver_statement (report)\rpt_final\2019\rpt_fnl_2019_gm_global_20200710.docx 15

VERIFICATION REPORT – 2019 GREENHOUSE GAS AND SUSTAINABILITY DATA ASSERTIONS GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY – GLOBAL FACILITIES

Summary of Findings July 10, 2020

Table 7 Sampling Plan and Results – Scope 2 Indirect Emissions and Renewables

Item Number Criteria Verification Procedures Findings 1. With respect to emissions from indirect sources, has the Desktop Assessment Procedures Overall Findings member appropriately calculated indirect emissions? DAP1 – Identify from provided spreadsheets how the DF1 - Satisfactory - The methodology was identified and • Is there sufficient and appropriate information to emissions are being calculated and determine if the it is reasonable. support the justification for the use of the methodology is reasonable. DF2 – Satisfactory - The indirect emissions from methodology? (i.e., has the reporter met the DAP2 - Recalculate electricity consumption emissions electricity were successfully recalculated. requirements to use the methodology?) for all facilities with electricity consumption reported. • Does the methodology deployed result in the most DF3 – Satisfactory - The emissions from delivered heat conservative GHG assertion? Assess how the DAP3 – Check that emissions from sources that are and purchased steam are calculated correctly and are member calculated indirect emissions and assess if less than 5% of the total Scope 2 emissions are reasonable for their respective quantities. the method applied is appropriate. reasonable. DF4 - Satisfactory – total renewable energy use and • Have the calculations been performed correctly (i.e., DAP4 – Reaggregate total renewable energy, and its associated GHG emissions reductions are accurately recalculate the emissions and compare)? application to overall reduction to Scope 2. aggregated and reported. DAP5 – Confirm % renewable energy use as total DF5 – Satisfactory - The percentage of total electricity energy use. which is renewable was successfully recalculated. DAP6 – Reaggregate total Scope 2 emissions and DF6 – Satisfactory. The Scope 2 assertion matches the check against final reported value. calculation spreadsheet.

Site Visit Procedures n/a 2. Are inputs into the Scope 2 – Indirect Emissions Desktop Assessment Procedures Overall Findings calculations supported with sufficient and appropriate DAP1 – Trace electricity invoices (3 months) for the DF1 – Satisfactory with Immaterial Discrepancy of 0.1% evidence (i.e., sufficient and adequate documentation)? facilities that collectively make up approximately 50% of of total Scope 1 & 2 emissions (under reported). Example things to check: electricity emissions for comparison to the total Emissions from electricity are supported by invoices but • Invoiced/Metered consumption – are spreadsheet reported quantity. for immaterial differences in volumes at three facilities data supported by on-site data? DAP2 – Confirm that the invoices sampled are within (3,499 tCO2e). • Are the emission factors and methodology used in 2019. DF2 – Satisfactory - direct emissions were calculated the GHG assertion accurate (i.e., up-to-date)? DAP3 – Identify the electricity emission factors used using 2019 data. • Any other activity data used is supported by the and determine if they are consistent for facilities within Entity’s system; the same GM region.

W:\General_Motors_Global_160900942_2019\6_val_ver_statement (report)\rpt_final\2019\rpt_fnl_2019_gm_global_20200710.docx 16

VERIFICATION REPORT – 2019 GREENHOUSE GAS AND SUSTAINABILITY DATA ASSERTIONS GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY – GLOBAL FACILITIES

Summary of Findings July 10, 2020

Item Number Criteria Verification Procedures Findings • Does the member calculate and report emissions DAP4 – Assess source of renewable energy and DF3 – Satisfactory – Location based EFs for electricity from electricity use with the location-based methods? sample as appropriate are appropriate for their regions. Market-based EFs are DAP5 - Assess whether quantification and aggregation appropriate for their use. methodologies are consistent with previous periods. DF4 – Satisfactory – Total renewable energy is supported by invoiced quantities. DF5 - Satisfactory – Quantification and aggregation Site Visit Procedures methodologies are consistent with the previous period. n/a

Table 8 Sampling Plan and Results – Select Scope 3 (Categories 3, 6, 11)

Item Criteria Verification Procedures Findings Number 1 With respect to emissions from Scope 3 sources, has the Desktop Assessment Procedures Overall Findings member appropriately calculated indirect emissions? DAP1 – Identify from provided spreadsheets how the DF1 - Satisfactory - The methodology used for Categories 3, 6, The entity reports in these categories: emissions are being calculated and determine if the and 11 was identified and is reasonable. • Category 3 – Fuel and Energy-Related Emissions methodology is reasonable for Category 3, 6, and 11 • Category 6 – Business Air Travel emissions. Rely on procedures in General, Scope 1 and DF2, DF3, DF4 - Immaterial quantitative discrepancy of 1% of • Category 11 – Use of Sold Products (Mobile Fuel Scope 2 tables to assess completeness, cut-off and Scope 3, Category 6. Emissions are under-reported by 215 t Combustion) consistency for Category 3 emissions. CO2e due to a summation calculation error in the activity data spreadsheet. Is there sufficient and appropriate information to support DAP2 - Recalculate Category 3 emissions for all

the justification for the use of the methodology? (i.e., has facilities.

the reporter met the requirements to use the DAP3 - Recalculate Category 6 emissions for all methodology?) facilities. Does the methodology deployed result in the most DAP4 - Recalculate Category 11 emissions for all conservative GHG assertion? Assess how the member facilities. calculated Scope 3 emissions and assess if the method Site Visit Procedures applied is appropriate. n/a

W:\General_Motors_Global_160900942_2019\6_val_ver_statement (report)\rpt_final\2019\rpt_fnl_2019_gm_global_20200710.docx 17

VERIFICATION REPORT – 2019 GREENHOUSE GAS AND SUSTAINABILITY DATA ASSERTIONS GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY – GLOBAL FACILITIES

Summary of Findings July 10, 2020

Item Criteria Verification Procedures Findings Number Have the calculations been performed correctly (i.e., recalculate the emissions and compare)?

2 Are inputs into the Scope 3 Emissions calculations Desktop Assessment Procedures Overall Findings supported with sufficient and appropriate evidence (i.e., DAP1 – Category 3 DF1 - Category 3 - Satisfactory emission factors, data sufficient and adequate documentation)? • Rely on procedures in General, Scope 1 and aggregation and assertion Example things to check: Scope 2 tables to assess accuracy of inputs to • Invoiced/Metered consumption – are spreadsheet Category 3 emissions. DF2 - Category 6 - Satisfactory emission factors, data data supported by on-site data? • Vouch the EFs used aggregation and assertion • Are the emission factors and methodology used in the GHG assertion accurate (i.e., up-to-date)? • Confirm that the data is within 2019. • Any other activity data used is supported by the DAP2 – Category 6 DF3 – Entity’s system; • Confirm that the inputs to Category 6 come from Category 11 –Immaterial qualitative discrepancy – • Is the member using life cycle emission factors to an appropriate source (total travelled km). vehicle production data is used instead of vehicle sold calculate emissions (except for Category 3)? data for the quantification of HFC emissions for Category • Vouch the EFs used • Is the member using 3rd party quantification tool? 11 Use of Sold Product. • Assess if it is reliable. Has the tool been used Confirm that the data is within 2019. appropriately, and is data entry accurate? DAP3 – Category 11 Category 11 –Immaterial quantitative discrepancy of • Confirm that the inputs to Category 11 come 1.5% over reported – due to incorrect use of weighted from an appropriate source (total vehicles, average equation in calculating fuel efficiency in North vehicle lifetime, vehicle km). Does the vehicle America (2,851,856 tCO2e). lifetime represent an appropriate lifecycle for the calculations? DF4 – Quantification and aggregation methodologies are • Vouch the EFs used consistent with previous periods • Confirm that the data is within 2019. DAP4 – Assess whether quantification and aggregation methodologies are consistent with previous periods. Site Visit Procedures n/a

W:\General_Motors_Global_160900942_2019\6_val_ver_statement (report)\rpt_final\2019\rpt_fnl_2019_gm_global_20200710.docx 18

VERIFICATION REPORT – 2019 GREENHOUSE GAS AND SUSTAINABILITY DATA ASSERTIONS GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY – GLOBAL FACILITIES

Summary of Findings July 10, 2020

Table 9 Sampling Plan and Results – Energy Use

Item Criteria Verification Procedure Findings Number 1 With respect to energy use, has the member reported Desktop Assessment Procedures Overall Findings appropriately? DAP1 – Rely on procedures in General, Scope 1 and DF1 - Satisfactory - The methodology was identified and • Is there sufficient and appropriate information to Scope 2 tables to assess completeness, cut-off and it is reasonable. support the justification for the use of the consistency. DF2 - Satisfactory – total Energy Use is accurately methodology? (i.e., has the reporter met the DAP2 – Reaggregate annual energy use. aggregated and reported. requirements to use the methodology?)

• Assess how the member calculated energy use and assess if the method applied is appropriate. Site Visit Procedures • Have the calculations been performed correctly (i.e., n/a recalculate the usage and compare)?

2 Are inputs into the Energy Use calculations supported Desktop Assessment Procedures Overall Findings with sufficient and appropriate evidence (i.e., sufficient DAP1 – Rely on procedures in General, Scope 1 and DF1 – Satisfactory with Immaterial quantitative and adequate documentation)? Scope 2 tables to assess accuracy. discrepancy of 0.2% of total Energy Use (under Examples of things to check: reported). Energy use is supported by invoices but for • Invoiced/Metered fuel consumption volumes – are immaterial differences in usage at several facilities spreadsheet data supported by on-site data? Site Visit Procedures (33,274 MWh). • Any other activity data used is supported by the n/a Satisfactory – energy use from 2019 is used for the Entity’s system; aggregation. Satisfactory – Quantification and aggregation methodologies are consistent with the previous period.

W:\General_Motors_Global_160900942_2019\6_val_ver_statement (report)\rpt_final\2019\rpt_fnl_2019_gm_global_20200710.docx 19

VERIFICATION REPORT – 2019 GREENHOUSE GAS AND SUSTAINABILITY DATA ASSERTIONS GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY – GLOBAL FACILITIES

Summary of Findings July 10, 2020

Table 10 Sampling Plan and Results – Water

Item Criteria Verification Procedure Findings Number 1 With respect to water use, has the member reported Desktop Assessment Procedures Overall Findings appropriately? DAP1 – Identify from provided spreadsheets how the DF1 - Satisfactory - The methodology was identified, and • Is there sufficient and appropriate information to water use is being aggregated and determine if the it is reasonable. support the justification for the use of the methodology is reasonable. DF2 - Satisfactory – total Water Use is accurately methodology? (i.e., has the reporter met the DAP2 - Reaggregate water consumption for all facilities. aggregated and reported. requirements to use the methodology?) • Assess how the member calculated water use and Site Visit Procedures assess if the method applied is appropriate. n/a • Have the calculations been performed correctly (i.e., recalculate the usage and compare)? 2 Are inputs into the Water Use calculations supported with Desktop Assessment Procedures Overall Findings sufficient and appropriate evidence (i.e., sufficient and DAP1 – Trace water invoices (3 months) for the facilities DF1- Satisfactory with Immaterial quantitative adequate documentation)? that collectively make up approximately 50% of total discrepancy of 0.3% of total Water Use (under reported). Examples of things to check: water use for comparison to the total reported quantity. Water use is supported by invoices but there are • Invoiced/Metered water consumption volumes – are DAP2 – Confirm that the invoices sampled are within immaterial differences in usage at four facilities (38,007 spreadsheet data supported by on-site data? 2019. m3). • Any other activity data used is supported by the DAP3 - Assess whether quantification and aggregation DF2 - Satisfactory – water use from 2019 is used for the Entity’s system; methodologies are consistent with previous periods. aggregation. DAP4 – Review final water assertion against draft data. DF3 - Satisfactory – Quantification and aggregation

methodologies are consistent with the previous period. DS4 - Immaterial qualitative discrepancy. Historical Site Visit Procedures data is used to backfill missing water invoices for 2 n/a facilities. This discrepancy is immaterial because these facilities only represent 527,972 m3 (0.09% of total water consumption).

W:\General_Motors_Global_160900942_2019\6_val_ver_statement (report)\rpt_final\2019\rpt_fnl_2019_gm_global_20200710.docx 20

VERIFICATION REPORT – 2019 GREENHOUSE GAS AND SUSTAINABILITY DATA ASSERTIONS GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY – GLOBAL FACILITIES

Summary of Findings July 10, 2020

Table 11 Sampling Plan and Results – Waste

Item Criteria Verification Procedure Findings Number 1 With respect to waste, has the member reported Desktop Assessment Procedures Overall Findings appropriately? DAP1 – Identify from provided spreadsheets how the Satisfactory - The methodology was identified and it is • Is there sufficient and appropriate information to waste is being aggregated and determine if the reasonable. support the justification for the use of the methodology is reasonable. Satisfactory – total waste produced is accurately methodology? (i.e., has the reporter met the DAP2 - Reaggregate waste for all facilities. aggregated and reported. requirements to use the methodology?)

• Assess how the member calculated waste and assess if the method applied is appropriate. • Have the calculations been performed correctly (i.e., Site Visit Procedures recalculate the waste quantities and compare)? n/a 2 Are inputs into the waste calculations supported with Desktop Assessment Procedures Overall Findings sufficient and appropriate evidence (i.e., sufficient and DAP1 – Trace waste data (1 month) for the facilities that Satisfactory – the annual waste quantity was correctly adequate documentation)? collectively make up approximately 50% of total waste aggregated for all facilities. of things to check: Examples for comparison to the total reported quantity. Satisfactory – waste from 2019 is used for the • Bills of lading, shipping records etc, – are spreadsheet data DAP2 – Confirm that the waste data sampled are within aggregation. supported by on-site data? 2019. • Any other activity data used is supported by the Entity’s Satisfactory – reporting boundary is consistent with the system; DAP3 - Assess whether quantification and aggregation previous reporting period (2018). methodologies are consistent with previous periods. Satisfactory – the number of landfill free facilities DAP4 – Assess number of landfill-free facilities asserted has been correctly aggregated and reported. assertion. Satisfactory – the total waste per vehicle data can be DAP5 – Assess total waste per produced vehicle correctly traced to manufacturing facility waste and assertion. verified production data. DAP6 – Assess year over year waste % assertion. Satisfactory – the year over year waste % assertion is calculated accurately. Site Visit Procedures n/a

W:\General_Motors_Global_160900942_2019\6_val_ver_statement (report)\rpt_final\2019\rpt_fnl_2019_gm_global_20200710.docx 21

VERIFICATION REPORT – 2019 GREENHOUSE GAS AND SUSTAINABILITY DATA ASSERTIONS GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY – GLOBAL FACILITIES

Summary of Findings July 10, 2020

Table 12 Sampling Plan and Results – Production

Item Criteria Verification Procedures Findings Number 1 With respect to production, has the member reported Desktop Assessment Procedures Overall Findings appropriately? DAP1 – Identify how the production data is being Satisfactory – production data is from a reliable source • Is there sufficient and appropriate information to aggregated and determine if the methodology is and the aggregation methodology is appropriate. support the justification for the use of the reasonable. Satisfactory – the total production quantity is accurately methodology? (i.e., has the reporter met the DAP2 - Reaggregate production for all facilities. aggregated and within the 2019 timeframe. requirements to use the methodology?) • Assess how the member calculated water use and DAP3 – Confirm that the data is within 2019. assess if the method applied is appropriate. Site Visit Procedures • Have the calculations been performed correctly (i.e., n/a recalculate the usage and compare)?

Table 13 Sampling Plan and Results – GRI 305 Emissions

Item Criteria Verification Procedures Findings Number GRI 305: The reporting organization shall report the following Desktop Assessment Procedures Overall Findings Emissions information: DAP1 – Rely on procedures in General, Scope 1 tables Satisfactory with Immaterial Quantitative Discrepancies Disclosure a. Gross direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions in metric tons to assess accuracy, completeness, cut-off and – Scope 1 GHG emissions are accurate and complete 305-1 of CO2 equivalent. consistency. for 2019 except for: Direct (Scope • Immaterial quantitative discrepancy of 0.05% of 1) GHG total Scope 1 & 2 emissions (under reported). Site Visit Procedures emissions Emissions from natural gas combustion are n/a supported by invoices but there are immaterial differences in volumes at three facilities. • Immaterial quantitative discrepancy of not more than 0.4% on Scope 1 and 2 (over-reported) emissions due to use of average annual cost of fuel

W:\General_Motors_Global_160900942_2019\6_val_ver_statement (report)\rpt_final\2019\rpt_fnl_2019_gm_global_20200710.docx 22

VERIFICATION REPORT – 2019 GREENHOUSE GAS AND SUSTAINABILITY DATA ASSERTIONS GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY – GLOBAL FACILITIES

Summary of Findings July 10, 2020

Item Criteria Verification Procedures Findings Number to determine quantity of fuel used in mobile emissions. • Immaterial quantitative discrepancy of 0.005% of total Scope 1 & 2 emissions (over-reported). Emissions from mobile combustion are over- reported by 275 t CO2e. GRI 305: The reporting organization shall report the following Desktop Assessment Procedures Overall Findings Emissions information: DAP1 – Rely on procedures in General, Scope 2 tables Satisfactory with Immaterial Quantitative Discrepancies Disclosure a. Gross location-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG to assess accuracy, completeness, cut-off and – Scope 2 GHG emissions are accurate and complete 305-2 emissions in metric tons of CO2 equivalent. consistency. for 2019 except for: Energy b. If applicable, gross market-based energy indirect • Immaterial quantitative discrepancy of 0.1% of indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions in metric tons of CO2 total Scope 1 & 2 emissions (under reported). Site Visit Procedures (Scope 2) equivalent. Emissions from electricity are supported by invoices GHG n/a but for immaterial differences in volumes at four emissions facilities.

GRI 305: The reporting organization shall report the following Desktop Assessment Procedures Overall Findings Emissions information: DAP1 – Rely on procedures in General, Scope 3 tables Satisfactory with Immaterial qualitative and quantitative Disclosure a. Gross other indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions in to assess accuracy, completeness, cut-off and discrepancies, including: 305-3 metric tons of CO2 equivalent. consistency. • Immaterial quantitative discrepancy of 1% of Other indirect Scope 3, Category 6. Emissions are under- (Scope 3) reported by 215 t CO2e due to a summation Site Visit Procedures GHG calculation error in the activity data emissions n/a spreadsheet. • Immaterial quantitative discrepancy of 1.5% of Category 11 over reported due to incorrect use of weighted average equation in calculating fuel efficiency in North America. • Immaterial qualitative discrepancy. Vehicle production data is used instead of vehicle sold data for the quantification of HFC emissions for

W:\General_Motors_Global_160900942_2019\6_val_ver_statement (report)\rpt_final\2019\rpt_fnl_2019_gm_global_20200710.docx 23

VERIFICATION REPORT – 2019 GREENHOUSE GAS AND SUSTAINABILITY DATA ASSERTIONS GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY – GLOBAL FACILITIES

Summary of Findings July 10, 2020

Item Criteria Verification Procedures Findings Number Category 11 Use of Sold Product. Using average data, this translates to a 0.02% difference (under-reported) in emissions for Scope 3, Category 11.

GRI 305: The reporting organization shall report the following Desktop Assessment Procedures Overall Findings Emissions information: DAP1 – Rely on procedures in General, Scope 1 tables Immaterial quantitative discrepancy of 0.1% of total Disclosure a. Gross emissions (NOx, SOx) to assess accuracy, completeness, cut-off and Scope 1 & 2 emissions (under reported). Emissions 305-7 consistency. from natural gas combustion are supported by invoices Nitrogen DAP2 – Review emission factors but there are immaterial differences in volumes at three Oxides facilities. The quantitative impact is 0.00002 and 0.01 DAP3 – Recalculate emissions (NOx), Sulfur thousand metric tonnes (under-reported) for SOx and Oxides NOx, respectively. (SOx), and other Site Visit Procedures significant air n/a emissions

Table 14 Sampling Plan and Results – GRI 302 Energy

Item Criteria Verification Procedures Findings Number GRI 302: The reporting organization shall report the following: Desktop Assessment Procedures Overall Findings Energy a. Total energy consumption within the organization, in DAP1 – Rely on procedures in General, Energy Use Satisfactory with Immaterial Quantitative Discrepancy – Disclosure joules or multiples. tables to assess accuracy, completeness, cut-off and Total energy consumption is accurate and complete for 302-1 Energy consistency. 2019 except for: consumption • Immaterial quantitative discrepancy of 0.2% within the of total Energy Use (under reported). Energy organization Site Visit Procedures use is supported by invoices but for immaterial n/a differences in usage at several facilities.

W:\General_Motors_Global_160900942_2019\6_val_ver_statement (report)\rpt_final\2019\rpt_fnl_2019_gm_global_20200710.docx 24

VERIFICATION REPORT – 2019 GREENHOUSE GAS AND SUSTAINABILITY DATA ASSERTIONS GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY – GLOBAL FACILITIES

Summary of Findings July 10, 2020

Table 15 Sampling Plan and Results – GRI 303 Water

Item Criteria Verification Procedures Findings Number GRI 303: The reporting organization shall report the following Desktop Assessment Procedures Overall Findings Water information: DAP1 – Rely on procedures in General, Water Use Satisfactory – Quantity of water used is accurate and Disclosure a. Total volume of water withdrawn, with a breakdown by tables to assess accuracy, completeness, cut-off and complete for 2019 except for: 303-1 the following sources: consistency. • Immaterial quantitative discrepancy of 0.1% Water i. Surface water, including water from wetlands, rivers, of total Water Use (under reported). Water withdrawal by lakes, and oceans; consumption are supported by invoices but Site Visit Procedures source ii. Ground water; there are immaterial differences in volumes at iii. Rainwater collected directly and stored by the n/a four facilities. organization; • Immaterial qualitative discrepancy. Historical water data is used to backfill missing water iv. Waste water from another organization; invoices at two facilities. This discrepancy is v. Municipal water supplies or other public or private considered immaterial because these two water utilities. facilities only represent 0.09% of total water consumption.

Table 16 Sampling Plan and Results – GRI 306 Waste

Item Criteria Verification Procedures Findings Number GRI The reporting organization shall report the following Desktop Assessment Procedures Overall Findings 306:Effluents information: DAP1 – Rely on procedures in General, Waste tables to Satisfactory – Quantity of waste is accurate and and Waste a. Total weight of non-hazardous waste, with a assess accuracy, completeness, cut-off and consistency. complete for 2019. Disclosure breakdown by the following disposal methods

306-2 where applicable: Site Visit Procedures Waste by i. Reuse type and ii. Recycling n/a

W:\General_Motors_Global_160900942_2019\6_val_ver_statement (report)\rpt_final\2019\rpt_fnl_2019_gm_global_20200710.docx 25

VERIFICATION REPORT – 2019 GREENHOUSE GAS AND SUSTAINABILITY DATA ASSERTIONS GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY – GLOBAL FACILITIES

Summary of Findings July 10, 2020

Item Criteria Verification Procedures Findings Number disposal iii. Composting method iv. Recovery, including energy recovery v. Incineration (mass burn) vi. Deep well injection vii. Landfill viii. On-site storage ix. Other (to be specified by the organization)

Table 17 Sampling Plan and Results – Year over Year Performance

Item Criteria Verification Procedures Findings Number 1 Global Energy – Year over Year Performance Desktop Assessment Procedures Overall Findings Is the statement accurate and transparent? DAP1 – Assess statement on energy use re: 2019 Satisfactory – the year over year performance value for Include check of previous year value for consistency for versus 2018. total energy use is accurate. boundary. DAP2 – Check that boundaries are the same between Satisfactory – the boundaries used for comparison to the 2018 and 2019. 2018 reporting year are substantially the same as the boundaries for the 2019 reporting year. Site Visit Procedures n/a 2 Water Use – Year over Year Performance Desktop Assessment Procedures Overall Findings Is the statement accurate and transparent? DAP1 – Assess statement on energy use re: 2019 Satisfactory – the year over year performance value for Include check of previous year value for consistency for versus 2018. total water use is accurate. boundary. DAP2 – Check that boundaries are the same between 2018 and 2019.

W:\General_Motors_Global_160900942_2019\6_val_ver_statement (report)\rpt_final\2019\rpt_fnl_2019_gm_global_20200710.docx 26

VERIFICATION REPORT – 2019 GREENHOUSE GAS AND SUSTAINABILITY DATA ASSERTIONS GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY – GLOBAL FACILITIES

Summary of Findings July 10, 2020

Item Criteria Verification Procedures Findings Number Site Visit Procedures Satisfactory – the boundaries used for comparison to the 2018 reporting year are substantially the same as the n/a boundaries for the 2019 reporting year.

3 GHG Emissions – Year over Year Performance Desktop Assessment Procedures Overall Findings Is the statement accurate and transparent? DAP1 – Assess statement on energy use re: 2019 Satisfactory – the year over year performance value for Include check of previous year value for consistency for versus 2018. total GHG emissions is accurate. boundary. DAP2 – Check that boundaries are the same between Satisfactory – the boundaries used for comparison to the 2018 and 2019. 2018 reporting year are substantially the same as the boundaries for the 2019 reporting year. Site Visit Procedures n/a

W:\General_Motors_Global_160900942_2019\6_val_ver_statement (report)\rpt_final\2019\rpt_fnl_2019_gm_global_20200710.docx 27

VERIFICATION REPORT – 2019 GREENHOUSE GAS AND SUSTAINABILITY DATA ASSERTIONS GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY – GLOBAL FACILITIES

Summary of Findings July 10, 2020

6.1 DISCREPANCIES

Several discrepancies were discovered during the verification. The identified discrepancies, resolutions, and remaining discrepancies are provided in Table 18.

Table 18 List of Discrepancies Identified During Verification Activities

Discrepancy Parameter Description of Discrepancy Resolution (tCO2e)

Scope 1 – Immaterial quantitative discrepancy of 2,763 t CO2e Not resolved Direct 0.05% of total Scope 1 & 2 emissions (under (under-reported), Stationary reported). Emissions from natural gas 0.05% of Scope 1 Combustion combustion are supported by invoices but & 2 emissions GHG there are immaterial differences in volumes Emissions at three facilities of approximately. Scope 1 – Immaterial quantitative discrepancy of not Maximum of 21,556 Not resolved Direct more than 0.4% on Scope 1 and 2 emissions t CO2e (over- Mobile GHG due to use of average annual cost of fuel to reported), 0.4% of Emissions determine quantity of fuel used in mobile Scope 1 & 2 emissions. emissions Scope 1 – Immaterial quantitative discrepancy of 275 t CO2e over- Not resolved Direct 0.005% of total Scope 1 & 2 emissions (over- reported, 0.005% of Mobile GHG reported). Stantec recalculated emissions Scope 1 & 2 Emissions and identified a difference between emissions recalculated quantity and assertion quantity of 275 t CO2e.

Scope 2 – Immaterial quantitative discrepancy of 3,499 t CO2e Not resolved Indirect 0.1% of total Scope 1 & 2 emissions (under (under-reported), Electricity reported). Emissions from electricity are 0.1% of Scope 1&2 GHG supported by invoices but for immaterial emissions Emissions differences in volumes at four facilities.

Scope 3 – Immaterial quantitative discrepancy of 1% 215 t CO2e (under- Not resolved Category 6 of Scope 3, Category 6. Emissions are reported), under-reported by 215 t CO2e due to a approximately 1% summation calculation error in the activity of total Category 6 data spreadsheet. Scope 3 emissions. Scope 3 – Immaterial qualitative discrepancy. Qualitative Not resolved Category 11 Vehicle production data is used instead of discrepancy with an vehicle sold data for the quantification of immaterial impact HFC emissions for Category 11 Use of Sold on total reported Product. Using average data, this translates emissions. to a 0.02% difference (under-reported) in emissions for Scope 3, Category 11. This discrepancy is qualitative since the discrepancy quantity cannot be quantified without a breakdown of vehicle models.

W:\General_Motors_Global_160900942_2019\6_val_ver_statement (report)\rpt_final\2019\rpt_fnl_2019_gm_global_20200710.docx 28

VERIFICATION REPORT – 2019 GREENHOUSE GAS AND SUSTAINABILITY DATA ASSERTIONS GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY – GLOBAL FACILITIES

Summary of Findings July 10, 2020

Discrepancy Parameter Description of Discrepancy Resolution (tCO2e)

Scope 3 – Immaterial quantitative discrepancy of 2,851,856 t CO2e Not resolved Category 11 1.5% over reported due to incorrect use of (over-reported), weighted average equation in calculating fuel approximately 1.5% efficiency in North America. of total Category 11 Scope 3 emissions. Energy Use Immaterial quantitative discrepancy of 33,274 MWh Not resolved 0.2% of total Energy Use (under reported). (under-reported), Energy use is supported by invoices but for approximately 0.2% immaterial differences in usage at several of total energy use facilities. Water Immaterial quantitative discrepancy of 38,007 m3 (under- Not resolved 0.1% of total Water Use (under reported). reported), Water consumption are supported by approximately 0.1% invoices but there are immaterial differences of total water use in volumes at four facilities. Water Immaterial qualitative discrepancy. Qualitative Not resolved Historical water data is used to backfill discrepancy with an missing water invoices at two facilities. This immaterial impact discrepancy is considered immaterial on total water use. because these two facilities only represent 0.09% of total water consumption. NOx/SOx Immaterial quantitative discrepancy of 0.00002 and 0.01 Not resolved 0.1% of total Scope 1 & 2 emissions (under thousand metric reported). Emissions from natural gas tonnes (under- combustion are supported by invoices but reported) for SOx there are immaterial differences in volumes and NOx, at three facilities. respectively. This discrepancy represents 0.1% of reported SOx emissions, and 0.8% of reported NOx emissions.

The unresolved discrepancies identified in Table 18 are below the materiality threshold of 5% within each assertion. Qualitatively and in conjunction with quantitative discrepancies, there are no material discrepancies.

W:\General_Motors_Global_160900942_2019\6_val_ver_statement (report)\rpt_final\2019\rpt_fnl_2019_gm_global_20200710.docx 29

VERIFICATION REPORT – 2019 GREENHOUSE GAS AND SUSTAINABILITY DATA ASSERTIONS GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY – GLOBAL FACILITIES

Conclusion July 10, 2020

7.0 CONCLUSION

Based on the processes and procedures completed, there is no evidence that GM’s stated GHG and sustainability data assertions for the 2019 calendar year are not, in all material respects, fairly stated in accordance with the criteria noted herein. A copy of the verification statement is provided in Appendix C.

W:\General_Motors_Global_160900942_2019\6_val_ver_statement (report)\rpt_final\2019\rpt_fnl_2019_gm_global_20200710.docx 30

VERIFICATION REPORT – 2019 GREENHOUSE GAS AND SUSTAINABILITY DATA ASSERTIONS GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY – GLOBAL FACILITIES

Closure July 10, 2020

8.0 CLOSURE

Stantec provides this conclusion as an independent verifier. Prior to entering into an assurance agreement Stantec assesses for any real, potential, or perceived conflict. Stantec continues to monitor for compromised impartiality throughout the engagement. No real, potential or perceived conflicts of interest were identified throughout the course of this verification.

Stantec provides this report to GM in accordance with our terms of agreement. We consent to its public release. Because of the inherent limitations in any verification, Stantec accepts no responsibility by use of a third party. Stantec has undertaken all assignments in its role as an environmental engineering consulting firm using professional effort consistent with ISO 14064:3. Stantec has assessed the 2019 GHG and sustainability data assertions for GM Global Facilities using reasonably ascertainable information. The assessment represents the conditions in the subject area at the time of the assessment. Stantec did not conduct direct GHG emissions monitoring or other environmental sampling and analysis in conjunction with this verification report. Stantec will retain all project documents for a minimum of seven (7) years.

If you have questions or require clarification regarding the contents of the report, please contact the undersigned.

Respectfully submitted,

STANTEC CONSULTING LTD.

Gizem Gunal-Akgol, P.Eng. Daniel Hegg, M.Sc., CEM Lead Verifier Independent Peer Reviewer Tel: (519) 569-8126 Tel: (250) 389-2538 [email protected] [email protected]

W:\General_Motors_Global_160900942_2019\6_val_ver_statement (report)\rpt_final\2019\rpt_fnl_2019_gm_global_20200710.docx 31

VERIFICATION REPORT – 2019 GREENHOUSE GAS AND SUSTAINABILITY DATA ASSERTIONSGENERAL MOTORS COMPANY – GLOBAL FACILITIES

Appendix A List of Excluded Facilities July 10, 2020

Appendix A LIST OF EXCLUDED FACILITIES

Property Property Property Property Site Name Property Name State Region Site Status Country Use Ownership Province Merced Motors United North America - Merced Chevrolet California Retail Lease Active Holding Dealership States Dealerships Xiamen OnStar Call Xiamen OnStar Call Fujian China GM China Office Joint Venture Active Center Center San Leandro San Leandro Motors United North America - Chevrolet (Main California Retail Lease Active Holding Dealership 1 States Dealerships Dealership) San Leandro San Leandro Motors United North America - Chevrolet (Satellite California Retail Lease Active Holding Dealership 2 States Dealerships Retail Showroom) GM Korea - Gunsan Korea, Gunsan Apartment Jeollabuk-do International Residential Own Active Apartment Republic Of Nanuet AHLLC Grandprize Cadillac United North America - New York Retail Lease Active Dealership 2 Chevrolet States Dealerships GM Financial - GM Financial - Pennsylvani United Philadelphia Branch Philadelphia Branch North America Office Lease Active a States Office 2 Office 2 GM Uruguay - Uruguay HQ WTC Montevideo Uruguay South America Office Lease Active Headquarters WTC Fairborn Motors Valentine Buick United North America - Ohio Retail Lease Active Holding Dealership GMC States Dealerships GM MEO - MEDC Dubayy United Arab Overflow CCA PDC International Warehouse Lease Active Overflow CCA PDC [Dubai] Emirates GM Holden - Hallam Hallam CCA BDC Victoria Australia International Warehouse Lease Active CCA BDC Lancaster Motors United North America - Antelope Valley California Retail Lease Active Holding Dealership States Dealerships New York GM Asset New York GM Asset United New York North America Office Lease Active Management Management States Kincardine Lakeside Chevrolet North America - Ontario Canada Retail Lease Active Dealership Buick GMC Dealerships GM Chile - Mall Plaza Antofagasta Antofagasta Chile South America Retail Lease Active Antofagasta Autoplaza GM Chile - Mall Plaza Del Talcahuano Bio Bio Chile South America Retail Lease Active Trebol Autoplaza GM Korea - Seoul Emergency Service Korea, Service Emergency AS Seoul International Lease Active Center Republic Of Center Center GM India - GMTCI GMTCI AC Delco - AC Delco Bhiwandi Maharashtra India International Warehouse Lease Active Bhiwandi PDC GM Financial - GM Financial - British Burnaby Branch Burnaby Branch Canada North America Office Lease Active Columbia Office II Office II GM Financial - GM Financial - United Arlington AOC III Arlington AOC III Texas North America Office Own Active States Collection Center Collection Center GM Financial - United Arlington AOC III ABC Office Texas North America Office Own Active States Collection Center Humberview Buick North America - Toronto Dealership II Ontario Canada Retail Lease Active GMC Dealerships GM Financial IO - GM Financial IO - Shanghai China GM China Office Lease Active GMAC-Shanghai GMAC - Shanghai Property Property Property Property Site Name Property Name State Region Site Status Country Use Ownership Province GM Financial IO - GM Financial IO - Shanghai China GM China Office Lease Active Fortune Plaza Fortune Plaza L.I. City - Service Long Island City United North America - New York Retail Own Active Center Service Center States Dealerships Irving US-SSM Irving US-SSM United South Central South Central Texas North America Office Lease Active States Regional Office 2 Regional Office 2 GM Financial IO - GM Financial IO - Cundinamar Colombia South America Office Mixed Active Edificio Calle 100 Edificio Calle 100 ca United Rippavilla Mansion Rippavilla Mansion Tennessee North America Other Lease Active States Moscow Aftersales Moscow Aftersales Russian Moskva North America Warehouse Lease Active Warehouse Warehouse Federation Moscow Aftersales Southgate Industrial Russian Moskva North America Warehouse Lease Active Warehouse Park - Building 2 Federation Region GM Financial IO - GM Financial IO - Metropolitan Chile South America Office Lease Active GMAC Chile Office 2 GMAC Chile Office 2 a de Santiago GM Financial IO - GM Financial IO - North United North America Office Lease Active Treasury Office Treasury Office Carolina States Buena Park AHLLC United North America - Premier Chevrolet California Retail Own Active Dealership 3 States Dealerships Android Industries - Android Industries - United Manufacturi Bundled Michigan North America Active Delta Township, LLC Delta Township, LLC States ng Service Manassas AHLLC United North America - Manassas Chevrolet Virginia Retail Own Active Dealership States Dealerships GM Financial - GM Financial - United Paramus Branch Paramus Branch New Jersey North America Office Lease Active States Office 2 Office #2 GM Brazil - Public Public Relations Federal Brazil South America Office Lease Active Relations Office Office District Fairfax - Inergy Fuel Inergy Fuel Tank United Manufacturi Kansas North America Own Active Tank Facility Facility States ng GM Financial - GM Financial - United Denver Branch Denver Branch Colorado North America Office Lease Active States Office 2 Office 2 GM Argentina GM Argentina Buenos Argentina South America Office Own Active Headquarters Headquarters Aires Naperville US-SSM Naperville US-SSM United North Central North Central Illinois North America Office Lease Active States Regional Office 2 Regional Office 2 GM Financial - Irving GM Financial - Irving United Commercial Lending Commercial Lending Texas North America Office Lease Active States Office Office GM India - Chevrolet Chevrolet Training Training Training Center Haryana India International Lease Active Center North Center North GM Financial - GM Financial - United Cincinnati Branch Cincinnati Branch Ohio North America Office Lease Active States Office 3 Office #3 GM Uzbekistan GM Uzbekistan Tashkent Uzbekistan International Office Own Active Tashkent Office Tashkent Office GM Japan - Training GM Japan - Training Training Tokyo Japan International Lease Active Center Center Center Property Property Property Property Site Name Property Name State Region Site Status Country Use Ownership Province GM India - GMTCI GMTCI AC Delco - Bundled AC Delco Gujarat India International Warehouse Active Ahmedabad Service Ahmedabad PDC

Newark Motors Tradition Chevrolet, United North America - New York Retail Own Active Holding Dealership Cadillac, Buick GMC States Dealerships Motors Holding Newark Motors United North America - Dealership Storage New York Retail Own Active Holding Dealership States Dealerships Shed Columbus Motors Sandoval Buick United North America - Ohio Retail Own Active Holding Dealership GMC States Dealerships Westlake Village US- Westlake Village US- United SSM Western SSM Western California North America Office Lease Active States Regional Office Regional Office GM Holden - Dandenong CCA Bundled Dandenong CCA Victoria Australia International Warehouse Active IPC Service IPC United Bundled Menlo Warehouse Menlo Warehouse Michigan North America Warehouse Active States Service Lansing Regional Lansing Regional United Michigan North America Warehouse Lease Active LOC LOC States Cadillac New York Cadillac New York United New York North America Office Lease Active Headquarters Headquarters States United Van Dyke Center Van Dyke Center Michigan North America Office Lease Active States Davison Motors Todd Wenzel Buick United North America - Michigan Retail Own Active Holding Dealership GMC of Davison States Dealerships Geneva Motors Tradition Chevrolet United North America - New York Retail Own Active Holding Dealership Buick States Dealerships Toledo Offsite Toledo Offsite United Bundled Ohio North America Warehouse Active Warehouse Warehouse States Service GM Financial IO - GM Financial IO - United Minnesota North America Office Lease Active CARRS CARRS States GM India - Chevrolet North PDC Haryana India International Warehouse Lease Active CCA North PDC Georgia IT Georgia Innovation United Innovation Center - Georgia North America Other Lease Active Center North States North GMIT RNAP GMIT RNAP - Singapore International Office Lease Active Colocation Space Colocation Space Dublin COLO Dublin COLO Leinster Ireland North America Other Lease Active Calacali Yard Vacant Land Pichincha Ecuador South America Land Lease Active GMIT Limerick GMIT Limerick Munster Ireland North America Office Lease Active Office Office Bellevue, WA - United North America - Vacant Land Washington Retail Own Active Cascade Place 1 States Dealerships GMK Gunsan Plant GMK Gunsan Plant Korea, Jeollabuk-do International Other Lease Active Child Care Center Child Care Center Republic Of Tallahassee - GM Tallahassee - GM United Florida North America Office Lease Active Public Policy Office Public Policy Office States Greenwich AHLLC Cadillac of United North America - Connecticut Retail Lease Active Dealership Greenwich States Dealerships Scottsdale AHLLC United North America - Van Chevrolet Arizona Retail Own Active Dealership States Dealerships United Bundled 1100 Crooks Road 1100 Crooks Road Michigan North America Warehouse Active States Service Property Property Property Property Site Name Property Name State Region Site Status Country Use Ownership Province Indianapolis Indianapolis United Regional Public Regional Public Indiana North America Office Lease Active States Policy Office Policy Office GM Indonesia NSC NSC Office Jakarta Indonesia International Office Lease Active Office Atlacomulco Land Vacant Land Mexico Mexico North America Land Own Active Brownstown Brownstown United Bundled Township CCA Township CCA Michigan North America Warehouse Active States Service Warehouse Warehouse United Bundled Portland CCA PXD Portland CCA PXD Oregon North America Warehouse Active States Service Hudson WI CCA Hudson WI CCA United Bundled Wisconsin North America Warehouse Active PXD PXD States Service Detroit Joy CCA Detroit Joy CCA United Bundled Michigan North America Warehouse Active Warehouse Warehouse States Service Toluca Offsite Toluca Offsite Estado De Warehouse Warehouse Mexico North America Warehouse Lease Active Mexico (Prologis) (Prologis) 2815 South 2815 South United Ohio North America Warehouse Lease Active Gettysburg Avenue Gettysburg Avenue States Windber PA Motors Memorial Highway Pennsylvani United North America - Retail Own Active Holding Dealership Chevrolet a States Dealerships Flint Maple Road Flint Maple Road United Bundled Michigan North America Warehouse Active Warehouse Warehouse States Service Flint Continental Flint Continental United Michigan North America Warehouse Lease Active Drive Warehouse Drive Warehouse States Flint Linden Creek Flint Linden Creek United Michigan North America Warehouse Lease Active Parkway Warehouse Parkway Warehouse States Cockeysville AHLLC Anderson Buick United North America - Maryland Retail Lease Active Dealership 2 GMC States Dealerships United Bundled Linc Linc Kitty Hawk Indiana North America Other Active States Service GMK Direct Sales GMK Direct Sales Korea, Branch Office - Branch Office - Daegu International Office Lease Active Republic Of Daegu Daegu GMK Direct Sales GMK Direct Sales Korea, Regional HQ - Regional HQ - Busan International Office Lease Active Republic Of Busan Busan

GMK Direct Sales GMK Direct Sales Korea, Seoul International Office Lease Active Regional HQ - Seoul Regional HQ - Seoul Republic Of GMK Direct Sales GMK Direct Sales Korea, Branch Office - Branch Office - Gyeonggi International Office Lease Active Republic Of Pyeongchon Pyeongchon Romulus CCA Romulus CCA United Bundled Michigan North America Warehouse Active Warehouse 1 Warehouse 1 States Service Livonia CCA Livonia CCA United Bundled Michigan North America Warehouse Active Warehouse Warehouse States Service Maven San Maven San United California North America Office Lease Active Francisco Francisco States United Bundled Martinsburg PXD Martinsburg PXD Maryland North America Warehouse Active States Service Detroit Metropolitan United Bundled Signature Aviation Michigan North America Other Active Airport States Service GM Philippines - GM Philippines - - Philippines International Office Lease Active Virtual Office Virtual Office Property Property Property Property Site Name Property Name State Region Site Status Country Use Ownership Province Wentzville Supplier Wentzville Supplier United Manufacturi Missouri North America Lease Active Park Park States ng Cruise Automation - Cruise Automation - United California North America Office Lease Active San Francisco San Francisco States Milan Motors Holding Erikson Chevrolet United North America - Illinois Retail Lease Active Dealership Buick States Dealerships GM Japan - CCA Bundled Japan - CCA PDC Saitama Japan International Warehouse Active PDC Service Canadian Technical Canadian Technical Center - Markham Center - Markham Ontario Canada North America Engineering Lease Active Campus Campus Turin Corso Telesio Turin Corso Telesio Piemonte Italy North America Engineering Lease Active United Maven Los Angeles Maven Los Angeles California North America Office Lease Active States Mall Aventura Plaza Mall Aventura Plaza Lima Peru South America Retail Lease Active Santa Anita Santa Anita Staten Island AHLLC Staten Island Buick United North America - New York Retail Lease Active Dealership 2 GMC States Dealerships GM Peru - Mall Del Mall Del Sul Lima Peru South America Retail Lease Active Sul Showroom Showroom Columbus AHLLC United North America - Dan Tobin Chevrolet Ohio Retail Lease Active Dealership 2 States Dealerships GM Financial - Westover Hills - United Westover Hills Texas North America Office Lease Active 3302 N Ellison, San States Antonio, TX United Maven San Diego Maven San Diego California North America Office Lease Active States Don Massey Cadillac Lone Tree AHLLC United North America - (New Car)(Elway Colorado Retail Own Active Dealership 2 States Dealerships Cadillac)

Don Massey Cadillac Lone Tree AHLLC United North America - (Pre-Owned)(Elway Colorado Retail Own Active Dealership 3 States Dealerships Cadillac) Lone Tree AHLLC Ed Bozarth Park United North America - Colorado Retail Own Active Dealership 4 Meadow Chevrolet States Dealerships GM Financial - GM Financial - United Atlanta Branch Atlanta Branch Georgia North America Office Lease Active States Office Office Livonia CCA Livonia CCA United Bundled Michigan North America Warehouse Active Warehouse 2 Warehouse 2 States Service Bolingbrook CCA- Bolingbrook CCA- United Bundled Illinois North America Warehouse Active Public Cross Dock Public Cross Dock States Service Gyeonggi- Korea, GMK-Jeongja-#101 GMK-Jeongja-#101 International Retail Lease Active do Republic Of GMK-Jeongja-#103- GMK-Jeongja-#103- Gyeonggi- Korea, International Retail Lease Active A A do Republic Of GMK-Jeongja -#103- GMK-Jeongja -#103- Gyeonggi- Korea, International Retail Lease Active B B do Republic Of Gyeonggi- Korea, GMK-Jeongja-#104 GMK-Jeongja-#104 International Retail Lease Active do Republic Of Gyeonggi- Korea, GMK-Hanam GMK-Hanam International Retail Lease Active do Republic Of Gyeonggi- Korea, GMK-Yangpyeong GMK-Yangpyeong International Retail Lease Active do Republic Of Property Property Property Property Site Name Property Name State Region Site Status Country Use Ownership Province GMK-Pyeongchang GMK-Pyeongchang Gangwon- Korea, International Retail Lease Active Olympic Olympic do Republic Of Gangwon- Korea, GMK-Sam Chuk GMK-Sam Chuk International Retail Lease Active do Republic Of Gyeongsang Korea, GMK-Kyungsan GMK-Kyungsan International Retail Lease Active buk-do Republic Of Korea, GMK-Seomyun GMK-Seomyun Busan International Retail Lease Active Republic Of Korea, GMK-Sasang GMK-Sasang Busan International Retail Lease Active Republic Of Korea, GMK-Gijang GMK-Gijang Busan International Retail Lease Active Republic Of Gyeongsang Korea, GMK-Samchunpo GMK-Samchunpo International Retail Lease Active nam-do Republic Of Gyeongsang Korea, GMK-Gimhae Jaeil GMK-Gimhae Jaeil International Retail Lease Active nam-do Republic Of Gyeongsang Korea, GMK-Masan Hanil GMK-Masan Hanil International Retail Lease Active nam-do Republic Of GMK-Changwon GMK-Changwon Gyeongsang Korea, International Retail Lease Active Seobu Seobu nam-do Republic Of Gyeongsang Korea, GMK-Tongyoug GMK-Tongyoug International Retail Lease Active nam-do Republic Of GMK-Mapo GMK-Mapo Korea, Seoul International Retail Lease Active Joongang Joongang Republic Of Korea, GMK-Wangshipli GMK-Wangshipli Seoul International Retail Lease Active Republic Of GMK-Uljungbu GMK-Uljungbu Gyeonggi- Korea, International Retail Lease Active Joongang Joongang do Republic Of GMK-Ilsan Joongang-GMK-Ilsan Joongang-Gyeonggi- Korea, International Retail Lease Active 1 1 do Republic Of Korea, GMK-Kundae GMK-Kundae Seoul International Retail Lease Active Republic Of Korea, GMK-Garak GMK-Garak Seoul International Retail Lease Active Republic Of Korea, GMK-Oryun GMK-Oryun Seoul International Retail Lease Active Republic Of Gyeonggi- Korea, GMK-Maseok GMK-Maseok International Retail Lease Active do Republic Of Korea, GMK-Yangjae 1 GMK-Yangjae Seoul International Retail Lease Active Republic Of Korea, GMK-Yeoksam 1 GMK-Yeoksam Seoul International Retail Lease Active Republic Of Gyeonggi- Korea, GMK-Bucheon Sinil GMK-Bucheon Sinil International Retail Lease Active do Republic Of Korea, GMK-Guro GMK-Guro Seoul International Retail Lease Active Republic Of Korea, GMK-Youseong GMK-Youseong Daejeon International Retail Lease Active Republic Of GMK-Cheongju GMK-Cheongju Chungcheon Korea, International Retail Lease Active Yongam Yongam gbuk-do Republic Of GM Financial - GM Financial - United Arlington Bardin Arlington Bardin Texas North America Office Lease Active States Office Office GM AMEO - Dubai GM AMEO - Dubai United Arab Dubai International Warehouse Lease Active CVO Warehouse CVO Warehouse Emirates Property Property Property Property Site Name Property Name State Region Site Status Country Use Ownership Province GM Financial - San GM Financial - San United Antonio Branch Antonio Branch Texas North America Office Lease Active States Office 3 Office 3 GMK-Bundang GMK-Bundang Gyeonggi- Korea, International Retail Lease Active Yatap Yatap do Republic Of GMWTC - Sinotrans Sinotrans Shanghai China GM China Warehouse Lease Active Warehouse Warehouse Gyeonggi- Korea, GMK-Gosaek GMK-Gosaek International Retail Lease Active do Republic Of Gyeonggi- Korea, GMK-Buk-Suwon GMK-Buk-Suwon International Retail Lease Active do Republic Of Gyeonggi- Korea, GMK-Dongtan GMK-Dongtan International Retail Lease Active do Republic Of Gyeonggi- Korea, GMK-Dong Suwon GMK-Dong Suwon International Retail Lease Active do Republic Of Gangwon- Korea, GMK-Hongcheon GMK-Hongcheon International Retail Lease Active do Republic Of GMK-Daegu GMK-Daegu Korea, Daegu International Retail Lease Active Sincheon Sincheon Republic Of Korea, GMK-Banyaworl GMK-Banyaworl Daegu International Retail Lease Active Republic Of Former RACER 173 United Vacant Land Ohio North America Land Mixed Active Acre Parcel States Gyeongsang Korea, GMK - Dong Andong GMK - Dong Andong International Retail Lease Active buk-do Republic Of Korea, GMK - Geumjeong GMK - Geumjeong Busan International Retail Lease Active Republic Of Gyeongsang Korea, GMK - Yangsan GMK - Yangsan International Retail Lease Active nam-do Republic Of Korea, GMK - Daeyeon GMK - Daeyeon Busan International Retail Lease Active Republic Of GM Indonesia - Vehicle Storage Bundled Vehicle Storage Jakarta Indonesia International Land Active Yard Service Yard GM MEO - Dubai Dubai Training United Arab Training Dubai International Lease Active Training Center Center Emirates Center GM Indonesia GM Indonesia Training Jakarta Indonesia International Lease Active Training Center Training Center Center GM Financial IO - GM Financial IO - Centro Bancaribe Centro Bancaribe Miranda Venezuela South America Office Own Active Las Mercedes Las Mercedes Cruise Automation - Cruise Automation - United California North America Engineering Lease Active San Francisco HQ San Francisco HQ States Maven Parking Ann United Ann Arbor-U of M Michigan North America Parking Lease Active Arbor-U of M States Maven Parking Ann United Ann Arbor-DDA Michigan North America Parking Lease Active Arbor-DDA States Korea, GMK - Yongho GMK - Yongho Busan International Retail Lease Active Republic Of Korea, GMK - Gupo GMK - Gupo Busan International Retail Lease Active Republic Of Korea, GMK - Hadan GMK - Hadan Busan International Retail Lease Active Republic Of Korea, GMK - Geumsa GMK - Geumsa Busan International Retail Lease Active Republic Of Korea, GMK - Janglim GMK - Janglim Busan International Retail Lease Active Republic Of Property Property Property Property Site Name Property Name State Region Site Status Country Use Ownership Province Gyeongsang Korea, GMK - Dongmasan GMK - Dongmasan International Retail Lease Active nam-do Republic Of Cruise Automation - Cruise Automation - United Shop/Lab/T Arizona North America Lease Active Phoenix Phoenix States est Maven Parking Detroit-NextEnergy United Detroit-NextEnergy Michigan North America Parking Lease Active Center States Center Maven Parking Los Los Angeles- United California North America Parking Lease Active Angeles-Gateway Gateway States Maven Parking New United New York-ICON New York North America Parking Lease Active York-ICON States Maven Parking San San Francisco- United Francisco-Tower California North America Parking Lease Active Tower Valet States Valet GM Israel Parking GM Israel Parking - Israel International Parking Lease Active Gyeongsang Korea, GMK-Geochang GMK-Geochang International Retail Lease Active nam-do Republic Of Gyeongsang Korea, GMK-Gaeumjeong GMK-Gaeumjeong International Retail Lease Active nam-do Republic Of Gyeonggi- Korea, GMK-Dongducheon GMK-Dongducheon International Retail Lease Active do Republic Of Korea, GMK-Joongwha GMK-Joongwha Seoul International Retail Lease Active Republic Of Korea, GMK-Myeongji GMK-Myeongji Seoul International Retail Lease Active Republic Of Cruise Automation - Cruise Automation - United California North America Engineering Lease Active South San Francisco South San Francisco States Korea, GMK-Bukbu GMK-Bukbu Seoul International Retail Lease Active Republic Of Gyeonggi- Korea, GMK-Uijeongbu GMK-Uijeongbu International Retail Lease Active do Republic Of Gyeonggi- Korea, GMK-Ilsan Hosu-105 GMK-Ilsan Hosu-105 International Retail Lease Active do Republic Of Korea, GMK-Dongseoul GMK-Dongseoul Seoul International Retail Lease Active Republic Of Korea, GMK-Cheonho GMK-Cheonho Seoul International Retail Lease Active Republic Of Korea, GMK-Jongno GMK-Jongno Seoul International Retail Lease Active Republic Of GMK-Bucheon GMK-Bucheon Gyeonggi- Korea, International Retail Lease Active Sangdong Sangdong do Republic Of Maven Parking Los Los Angeles-Union United Angeles-Union California North America Parking Lease Active Station States Station Korea, GMK-Guro Oryu GMK-Guro Oryu Seoul International Retail Lease Active Republic Of GMK-Gangseogu GMK-Gangseogu Korea, Seoul International Retail Lease Active Office Office Republic Of GMK-Gangseo GMK-Gangseo Korea, Seoul International Retail Lease Active Balsan Balsan Republic Of Korea, GMK-Mokdong GMK-Mokdong Seoul International Retail Lease Active Republic Of Korea, GMK-Nam-Daejeon GMK-Nam-Daejeon Daejeon International Retail Lease Active Republic Of Chungcheon Korea, GMK-Nam-Cheonan GMK-Nam-Cheonan International Retail Lease Active gnam-do Republic Of Property Property Property Property Site Name Property Name State Region Site Status Country Use Ownership Province GMK-Daedeok GMK-Daedeok Korea, Daejeon International Retail Lease Active Valley Valley Republic Of GMK-Daejeon GMK-Daejeon Korea, Daejeon International Retail Lease Active Dunsan Dunsan Republic Of Chungcheon Korea, GMK-Daecheon GMK-Daecheon International Retail Lease Active gnam-do Republic Of Chungcheon Korea, GMK-Asan Jungang GMK-Asan Jungang International Retail Lease Active gnam-do Republic Of GMK-Cheonan GMK-Cheonan Chungcheon Korea, International Retail Lease Active Bukbu Bukbu gnam-do Republic Of GMK-Cheonan GMK-Cheonan Chungcheon Korea, International Retail Lease Active Joongbu Joongbu gnam-do Republic Of GMK-Cheonan GMK-Cheonan Chungcheon Korea, International Retail Lease Active Jungang Jungang gnam-do Republic Of Maven-30 Maven Advertising- District of United Massachusetts 30 Massachusetts North America Other Lease Active Columbia States Avenue Avenue Maven-30 Maven Parking-30 District of United Massachusetts Massachusetts North America Parking Lease Active Columbia States Avenue Avenue San Luis Manufacturi San Luis Potosi LOC San Luis Potosi LOC Mexico North America Lease Active Potosi ng Cruise Automation - Cruise Automation - United California North America Office Lease Active 349 9th Street 349 9th Street States Beverly Hills AHLLC United North America - Beverly Hills Cadillac California Retail Lease Active Dealership States Dealerships Hamilton CCA Public Hamilton CCA Public United Bundled Ohio North America Other Active Cross Dock Cross Dock States Service Chungcheon Korea, GMK-Hongseong GMK-Hongseong International Retail Lease Active gnam-do Republic Of Chungcheon Korea, GMK-Shincheongju GMK-Shincheongju International Retail Lease Active gbuk-do Republic Of GMK - Gwangju GMK - Gwangju Korea, Gwangju International Retail Lease Active Yongbong Yongbong Republic Of Jeollanam- Korea, GMK-Mokpo Yudal GMK-Mokpo Yudal International Retail Lease Active do Republic Of GM India - India Registered Gujarat India International Office Lease Active Registered Office Office Santa Monica Santa Monica Buick United North America - California Parking Lease Active AHLLC Dealership 2 GMC States Dealerships Maven Office San San Francisco- United Francisco-Brannan California North America Office Lease Active Brannan Street States Street Gyeonggi- Korea, GMK-Pyeongtaek GMK-Pyeongtaek International Retail Lease Active do Republic Of Gyeonggi- Korea, GMK-Jeonga #102-A GMK-Jeonga #102-A International Retail Lease Active do Republic Of Gyeonggi- Korea, GMK-Jeonga #102B GMK-Jeonga #102B International Retail Lease Active do Republic Of GMK-Boondang Ori GMK-Boondang Ori Gyeonggi- Korea, International Retail Lease Active 1 1 do Republic Of GMK-Boondang Ori GMK-Boondang Ori Gyeonggi- Korea, International Retail Lease Active 2 2 do Republic Of Gyeonggi- Korea, GMK-Seo-Suwon GMK-Seo-Suwon International Retail Lease Active do Republic Of GMK-Suwon GMK-Suwon Gyeonggi- Korea, International Retail Lease Active Jungang 1 Jungang 1 do Republic Of Property Property Property Property Site Name Property Name State Region Site Status Country Use Ownership Province Gyeonggi- Korea, GMK-Songtan GMK-Songtan International Retail Lease Active do Republic Of Gyeonggi- Korea, GMK-Osan GMK-Osan International Retail Lease Active do Republic Of Gyeonggi- Korea, GMK-Anseong GMK-Anseong International Retail Lease Active do Republic Of Gyeonggi- Korea, GMK-Jukjeon GMK-Jukjeon International Retail Lease Active do Republic Of GMK-Suji GMK-Suji Gyeonggi- Korea, International Retail Lease Active Dongcheon Dongcheon do Republic Of GMK-Gyeonggi- GMK-Gyeonggi- Gyeonggi- Korea, International Retail Lease Active Gwangju Gwangju do Republic Of Gangwon- Korea, GMK-Wonju GMK-Wonju International Retail Lease Active do Republic Of Gangwon- Korea, GMK-Sokcho GMK-Sokcho International Retail Lease Active do Republic Of GMK-Gangneung GMK-Gangneung Gangwon- Korea, International Retail Lease Active Jeil Jeil do Republic Of Maven Parking San San Francisco-2351 United Francisco-2351 California North America Parking Lease Active Mission St States Mission St GMHANSC - CVO & GMHANSC - CVO & Victoria Australia International Warehouse Lease Active Engineering Garage Engineering Garage Korea, GMK-Daegu Susung GMK-Daegu Susung Daegu International Retail Lease Active Republic Of Korea, GMK-Siji Showroom GMK-Siji Showroom Daegu International Retail Lease Active Republic Of GMK-Daegu GMK-Daegu Korea, Daegu International Retail Lease Active Yongsan Yongsan Republic Of Korea, GMK-Manpyung GMK-Manpyung Daegu International Retail Lease Active Republic Of Korea, GMK-Daegu-Bukbu GMK-Daegu-Bukbu Daegu International Retail Lease Active Republic Of Korea, GMK-Dalseong GMK-Dalseong Daegu International Retail Lease Active Republic Of Korea, GMK-Daegu Seobu GMK-Daegu Seobu Daegu International Retail Lease Active Republic Of Gyeongsang Korea, GMK-Bukpohang GMK-Bukpohang International Retail Lease Active buk-do Republic Of Gyeongsang Korea, GMK-Youngju GMK-Youngju International Retail Lease Active buk-do Republic Of GMK-Gumi GMK-Gumi Gyeongsang Korea, International Retail Lease Active Songjeong Songjeong buk-do Republic Of GMK-Gyungju GMK-Gyungju Gyeongsang Korea, International Retail Lease Active Hwangseong Hwangseong buk-do Republic Of GMK-Ulsan Junggu GMK-Ulsan Junggu Korea, Ulsan International Retail Lease Active (Showroom) (Showroom) Republic Of GMK-Ulsan GMK-Ulsan Korea, Ulsan International Retail Lease Active Gongdan Gongdan Republic Of Korea, GMK-Shin Ulsan GMK-Shin Ulsan Ulsan International Retail Lease Active Republic Of GMK - Shin GMK - Shin Korea, Busan International Retail Lease Active Gaegeum Gaegeum Republic Of Korea, GMK - Hwamyung GMK - Hwamyung Busan International Retail Lease Active Republic Of Korea, GMK - Yeonsan GMK - Yeonsan Busan International Retail Lease Active Republic Of Property Property Property Property Site Name Property Name State Region Site Status Country Use Ownership Province GMK - Changwon GMK - Changwon Gyeongsang Korea, International Retail Lease Active Terminal Terminal nam-do Republic Of GMK - Gimhae GMK - Gimhae Gyeongsang Korea, International Retail Lease Active Nambu (Office) Nambu (Office) nam-do Republic Of GMK - Gimhae GMK - Gimhae Gyeongsang Korea, International Retail Lease Active Nambu (Showroom) Nambu (Showroom) nam-do Republic Of GMK - Masan GMK - Masan Gyeongsang Korea, International Retail Lease Active Jungang Jungang nam-do Republic Of Gyeongsang Korea, GMK - Woong Sang GMK - Woong Sang International Retail Lease Active nam-do Republic Of GMK - Yangsan New GMK - Yangsan New Gyeongsang Korea, International Retail Lease Active Town Town nam-do Republic Of Gyeongsang Korea, GMK - Jinju Dodong GMK - Jinju Dodong International Retail Lease Active nam-do Republic Of Gyeongsang Korea, GMK - Jinhae GMK - Jinhae International Retail Lease Active nam-do Republic Of Gyeongsang Korea, GMK - Gohyun GMK - Gohyun International Retail Lease Active nam-do Republic Of Gyeongsang Korea, GMK - Geoje Aju GMK - Geoje Aju International Retail Lease Active nam-do Republic Of Korea, GMK - Namyangju GMK - Namyangju Gyeonggi International Retail Lease Active Republic Of Korea, GMK - Mia GMK - Mia Seoul International Retail Lease Active Republic Of Korea, GMK - Bukseoul GMK - Bukseoul Seoul International Retail Lease Active Republic Of Danbury US-SSM Danbury US-SSM United Northeast Regional Northeast Regional Connecticut North America Office Lease Active States Office 2 Office 2 Telecommunications Morro do Itapeti Sao Paulo Brazil South America Other Own Active Building GM Israel - GM Israel - Specialized Specialized - Israel International Engineering Lease Active Engineering Center Engineering Center Maven Parking San San Francisco- United Francisco-Mission California North America Parking Lease Active Mission Street States Street Pennsylvani United Bundled Langhorne PA CCA Langhorne PA CCA North America Warehouse Active a States Service Adam Opel Haus - N060 - Transition Transition Management Team Hessen Germany North America Office Lease Active Management Team (TMT) (TMT) Residential Building- Residential Building- Sao Paulo Brazil South America Residential Own Active Sao Paulo Sao Paulo Luton UK - Griffin Vauxhall Tech United England North America Office Lease Active House Centre Kingdom Maven Parking San San Diego-El Cajon United Diego-El Cajon California North America Parking Lease Active Boulevard States Boulevard

Holden New Zealand Holden New Zealand New Training Auckland International Lease Active - Training Center - Training Center Zealand Center Maven University United Car Share Los Los Angeles-USC California North America Parking Lease Active States Angeles-USC Property Property Property Property Site Name Property Name State Region Site Status Country Use Ownership Province

Maven Home Car San Francisco- United Share San Francisco- California North America Parking Lease Active Howard Street States Howard Street

GMK - Seodaemun GMK - Seodaemun Korea, Seoul International Retail Lease Active (Showroom) (Showroom) Republic Of GMK - Seodaemun GMK - Seodaemun Korea, Seoul International Retail Lease Active (Office) (Office) Republic Of GMK - Shindap- GMK - Shindap- Korea, Seoul International Retail Lease Active Sunbong Sunbong Republic Of GMK - GMK - Korea, Seoul International Retail Lease Active Janghanpyeong Janghanpyeong Republic Of Gyeonggi- Korea, GMK - Yangju GMK - Yangju International Retail Lease Active do Republic Of Korea, GMK - Yeonsinnae GMK - Yeonsinnae Seoul International Retail Lease Active Republic Of Gyeonggi- Korea, GMK - Ilsan Hosu 3 GMK - Ilsan Hosu 3 International Retail Lease Active do Republic Of Gyeonggi- Korea, GMK - Pocheon GMK - Pocheon International Retail Lease Active do Republic Of GMK - Hwajeong GMK - Hwajeong Gyeonggi- Korea, International Retail Lease Active Office Office do Republic Of Korea, GMK - Taereung GMK - Taereung Seoul International Retail Lease Active Republic Of Gyeonggi- Korea, GMK - Songwoo GMK - Songwoo International Retail Lease Active do Republic Of GMK - Dobong GMK - Dobong Korea, Seoul International Retail Lease Active Jungang Jungang Republic Of GMK - Seocho GMK - Seocho Korea, Seoul International Retail Lease Active Jungang Jungang Republic Of Korea, GMK - Bupyeongro GMK - Bupyeongro Incheon International Retail Lease Active Republic Of Korea, Seoul PR Seoul PR Seoul International Office Lease Active Republic Of Maven Home Car Detroit-East United Share Detroit-East Michigan North America Parking Lease Active Jefferson States Jefferson Former Arteb Former Arteb Rio Grande Manufacturi Brazil South America Own Active Supplier Site Supplier Building do Sul ng GM Indonesia - Bundled Bekasi CCA PDC West Java Indonesia International Warehouse Active Bekasi CCA PDC Service Korea, GMK - Buk Incheon GMK - Buk Incheon Incheon International Retail Lease Active Republic Of Korea, GMK - Nam-Incheon GMK - Nam-Incheon Incheon International Retail Lease Active Republic Of GMK - Bucheon GMK - Bucheon Gyeonggi- Korea, International Retail Lease Active Seobu Seobu do Republic Of GMK - Jungang- GMK - Jungang- Gyeonggi- Korea, International Retail Lease Active dong dong do Republic Of Korea, GMK - Yeonsu GMK - Yeonsu Incheon International Retail Lease Active Republic Of United Saran Saran Indiana North America Warehouse Lease Active States GM Holden - South Elizabeth CCA ACDC Australia International Warehouse Lease Active Australia ACDC Property Property Property Property Site Name Property Name State Region Site Status Country Use Ownership Province GM Israel - Vehicle Shop/Lab/T Vehicle Test Track - Israel International Lease Active Test Track est GMK - Gimpo GMK - Gimpo Gyeonggi- Korea, International Retail Lease Active Hangang Hangang do Republic Of Gyeonggi- Korea, GMK - Anyang Bisan GMK - Anyang Bisan International Retail Lease Active do Republic Of Gyeonggi- Korea, GMK - Uiwang GMK - Uiwang International Retail Lease Active do Republic Of GMK - GMK - Korea, Seoul International Retail Lease Active Youngdeungpo Youngdeungpo Republic Of Korea, GMK - Sangdo GMK - Sangdo Seoul International Retail Lease Active Republic Of Korea, GMK - Seo-Daejeon GMK - Seo-Daejeon Daejeon International Retail Lease Active Republic Of Chungcheon Korea, GMK - Seosan GMK - Seosan International Retail Lease Active gnam-do Republic Of Chungcheon Korea, GMK - Shinjecheon GMK - Shinjecheon International Retail Lease Active gbuk-do Republic Of GMK - Cheongju GMK - Cheongju Chungcheon Korea, International Retail Lease Active Yulryang Yulryang gbuk-do Republic Of Ellesmere Port - Ellesmere Port - United England North America Office Lease Active Pioneer House Pioneer House Kingdom GMK - Nam GMK - Nam Korea, Gwangju International Retail Lease Active Gwangju Gwangju Republic Of GMK - Yangchun GMK - Yangchun Korea, Seoul International Retail Lease Active Sinwol Sinwol Republic Of Gyeonggi- Korea, GMK - Byeolnae GMK - Byeolnae International Retail Lease Active do Republic Of Korea, GMK - Anam GMK - Anam Seoul International Retail Lease Active Republic Of Gyeonggi- Korea, GMK - Buk-Ilsan GMK - Buk-Ilsan International Retail Lease Active do Republic Of Cruise Automation - Cruise Automation - United Shop/Lab/T New York North America Lease Active New York New York States est Los Angeles AHLLC Beverly Hills Cadillac United North America - California Retail Lease Active Service Center Service States Dealerships Korea, GMK - Yangsan GMK - Yangsan Seoul International Retail Lease Active Republic Of GM Mexico - Abamex Training Training Abamex Training Mexico Mexico North America Lease Active Center Center Center

GM Mexico - Unicars Unicars Training Training Mexico Mexico North America Lease Active Training Center Center Center Chevrolet Marketing - Chevrolet Marketing - United England North America Office Lease Active Luton Office Luton Office Kingdom GM Ecuador - Calderon Calderon Pichincha Ecuador South America Warehouse Lease Active Warehouse Warehouse Maven Parking Baltimore-West United Baltimore-West Maryland North America Parking Lease Active Dickman States Dickman GM Korea - Media Korea, Media Center Seoul International Office Lease Active Center Republic Of GMK - Icheon GMK - Icheon Gyeonggi- Korea, International Retail Lease Active Janghowon Janghowon do Republic Of Property Property Property Property Site Name Property Name State Region Site Status Country Use Ownership Province Korea, GMK - Sangbong GMK - Sangbong Seoul International Retail Lease Active Republic Of Gyeonggi- Korea, GMK - Hwajung GMK - Hwajung International Retail Lease Active do Republic Of Korea, GMK - Sinchon GMK - Sinchon Seoul International Retail Lease Active Republic Of GMK - GMK - Gyeonggi- Korea, International Retail Lease Active Gwangmyeong Gwangmyeong do Republic Of Spring Hill - Martin Martin Supplier United Bundled Tennessee North America Warehouse Active Supplier Warehouse Warehouse States Service Maven Parking Los Los Angeles-USC United California North America Parking Lease Active Angeles-USC UPX UPX States Former IPA Supplier Former IPA Supplier Rio Grande Manufacturi Brazil South America Own Active Site Site do Sul ng GM Financial - Lake GM Financial - Lake United Florida North America Office Lease Active Mary Branch Office Mary Branch Office States Maven Parking San San Francisco-704 United Francisco-704 California North America Parking Lease Active Steiner States Steiner Maven Parking San San Francisco-2770 United Francisco-2770 California North America Parking Lease Active Newhall States Newhall Maven Parking San San Francisco-668 United Francisco-668 California North America Parking Lease Active Townsend States Townsend Maven Parking San San Francisco-326 United Francisco-326 California North America Parking Lease Active Gennessee States Gennessee United Bundled Denver PDX Denver PDX Colorado North America Warehouse Active States Service Auburn Hills GPS Auburn Hills GPS United Michigan North America Office Lease Active Turn-Around Space Turn-Around Space States Maven Parking San San Francisco-350 United Francisco-350 California North America Parking Lease Active Parnassus States Parnassus Maven Parking Toronto-Impark Lot Toronto-Impark Lot Ontario Canada North America Parking Lease Active 407 407 Maven Parking Toronto-Impark Lot Toronto-Impark Lot Ontario Canada North America Parking Lease Active 344 344 Maven Parking Toronto-Impark Lot Toronto-Impark Lot Ontario Canada North America Parking Lease Active 472 472 Maven Parking Toronto-Impark Lot Toronto-Impark Lot Ontario Canada North America Parking Lease Active 63 63 Maven Parking Toronto-Impark Lot Toronto-Impark Lot Ontario Canada North America Parking Lease Active 235 235 Maven Parking Toronto-Impark Lot Toronto-Impark Lot Ontario Canada North America Parking Lease Active 309 309 Maven Parking Toronto-Target Park Toronto-Target Park Ontario Canada North America Parking Lease Active 2 2 Property Property Property Property Site Name Property Name State Region Site Status Country Use Ownership Province Maven Parking Toronto-Target Park Toronto-Target Park Ontario Canada North America Parking Lease Active 3 3 Maven Parking Toronto-Target Park Toronto-Target Park Ontario Canada North America Parking Lease Active 4 4 Maven Parking Toronto-Target Park Toronto-Target Park Ontario Canada North America Parking Lease Active 5 5 Maven Parking Toronto-Target Park Toronto-Target Park Ontario Canada North America Parking Lease Active 6 6 Maven Parking Toronto-Target Park Toronto-Target Park Ontario Canada North America Parking Lease Active 7 7 Maven Parking Toronto-Target Park Toronto-Target Park Ontario Canada North America Parking Lease Active 8 8 Maven Parking Ontario-Target Park Ontario-Target Park Ontario Canada North America Parking Lease Active 9 9 Maven Parking Ontario-Target Park Ontario-Target Park Ontario Canada North America Parking Lease Active 10 10 Maven Parking Toronto-Target Park Toronto-Target Park Ontario Canada North America Parking Lease Active 11 11 Maven Parking Toronto-Target Park Toronto-Target Park Ontario Canada North America Parking Lease Active 13 13 Maven Parking Toronto-Target Park Toronto-Target Park Ontario Canada North America Parking Lease Active 14 14 Maven Parking Toronto-Target Park Toronto-Target Park Ontario Canada North America Parking Lease Active 15 15 Maven Parking Toronto-Target Park Toronto-Target Park Ontario Canada North America Parking Lease Active 16 16 Maven Parking Toronto-Target Park Toronto-Target Park Ontario Canada North America Parking Lease Active 17 17 Maven Parking Los Los Angeles- United Angeles-Runway California North America Parking Lease Active Runway Playa Vista States Playa Vista Maven Parking San San Francisco-2679 United Francisco-2679 California North America Parking Lease Active Ocean States Ocean Sacramento Public Sacramento Public United California North America Office Lease Active Policy Office Policy Office States Maven Parking Detroit-Center United Detroit-Center Michigan North America Parking Lease Active Garage States Garage GMK-Jungang-daero-GMK-Busan Owned Korea, Busan International Retail Own Active Busan Service Center Republic Of Property Property Property Property Site Name Property Name State Region Site Status Country Use Ownership Province Maven Car Share Washington-1212 District of United Washington-1212 North America Parking Lease Active 4th Street SE Columbia States 4th Street SE GCCX Call Center - GCCX Call Center - Bundled Mexico Mexico North America Office Active Mexico City Mexico City Service Silao VAA Silao VAA Bundled Warehouse Warehouse Guanajuato Mexico North America Warehouse Active Service (Android) (Android) Matthew Drive - Matthew Drive - United Warehouse/Distributi Warehouse/Distributi Michigan North America Warehouse Lease Active States on on Maven Parking Westwood Garage- United Westwood-1015 California North America Parking Lease Active 1015 Hilgard States Hilgard Distribuidores Distribuidores Training Autoizados-Training Autoizados-Training Jalisco Mexico North America Lease Active Center Center Center United CVO Warehouse CVO Warehouse Michigan North America Warehouse Lease Active States San Francisco Maven Parking SF- United Stockton Garage- California North America Parking Lease Active 444 Stockton St. States 444 Stockton St. Maven Parking SF San Francisco Performing Arts Performing Arts United California North America Parking Lease Active Garage-360 Grove Garage-360 Grove States Street Street Vesta Warehouse Vesta Warehouse Guanajuato Mexico North America Warehouse Lease Active PTO 01-Vesta Park PTO 01-Vesta Park Maven Parking San San Francisco-2500 United Francisco-2500 24th California North America Parking Lease Active 24th Street States Street

Maven Parking San San Francisco Union United Francisco-333 Post Square Garage-333 California North America Parking Lease Active States Street Post Street

Cruise Automation - Cruise Automation - United California North America Other Lease Active Strobe-Pasadena Strobe-Pasadena States Everett Chevrolet Everett Chevrolet United North America - Arkansas Retail Lease Active #2, Inc. #2, Inc. States Dealerships GMK-Cadillac House- Korea, DMCC Building Seoul International Office Lease Active Seoul Republic Of Teleperformance Teleperformance Cundinamar SSA Contact Center -SSA Contact Center - Colombia South America Office Lease Active ca Bogota Bogota Cruise Automation - Cruise Automation - United California North America Engineering Lease Active San Francisco 2 San Francisco 2 States Cruise Automation - Cruise Automation - United California North America Office Lease Active San Francisco 3 San Francisco 3 States Cruise Automation - Cruise Automation - United California North America Office Lease Active San Francisco 4 San Francisco 4 States Chevrolet Del Rio - Chevrolet Del Rio - Monterrey, Training Monterrey Training Monterrey Training Mexico North America Lease Active Nuevo Leon Center Center Center Maven GIG Maven Office - 330 Massachuse United Massachusetts-449 North America Office Lease Active Canal Street tts States Canal Street Property Property Property Property Site Name Property Name State Region Site Status Country Use Ownership Province Merida-GM Training Merida-GM Training Training Yucatan Mexico North America Lease Active Center Center Center Maven Parking Maven Timbercreek- Timbercreek- Ontario Canada North America Parking Lease Active Dufferin Street Dufferin Street Maven PACE- Maven PACE- McCaul-53 McCaul McCaul-53 McCaul Ontario Canada North America Parking Lease Active Street Street Cruise Automation - Cruise Automation - United California North America Parking Lease Active San Francisco 5 San Francisco 5 States Roanoke TX CCA Roanoke TX CCA United Bundled Texas North America Warehouse Active Warehouse Warehouse States Service Maven Home Car Share-Los Angeles- Los Angeles-South United California North America Parking Lease Active South Fairfax Fairfax Avenue States Avenue GM Financial - GM Financial - United Texas North America Office Lease Active Brookhollow Brookhollow States Maven Parking- Where I Park- Where I Park- Ontario Canada North America Parking Lease Active Adelaide Street Adelaide Street Maven Parking Maven Toronto- Toronto-Target Park- Target Park- Ontario Canada North America Parking Lease Active 985 Woodbine Woodbine Maven Parking Maven Toronto- Toronto-Target Park- Target Park-Oriole Ontario Canada North America Parking Lease Active 1 Oriole Road Road Maven Parking Maven Toronto- Toronto-Target Park- Target Park- Ontario Canada North America Parking Lease Active 275 Howland Howland Avenue Avenue Maven Parking Maven Toronto- Toronto-Target Park- Target Park-King Ontario Canada North America Parking Lease Active 560 King Street W Street W GM Financial - GM Financial - United Washington North America Office Lease Active Seattle Branch 2 Seattle Branch 2 States Maven Parking Maven Avalon Avalon Pasadena-25 United Pasadena-South California North America Parking Lease Active South Oak Knoll States Oak Knoll Avenue Avenue GM Financial - Brookfield Brookfield Branch United Wisconsin North America Office Lease Active Crossroads Office States Corporate Center XII Maven Parking Maven Toronto- Toronto-200 Wellington Street Ontario Canada North America Parking Lease Active Wellington Street West-Lot 76 West United AW House AW House England North America Office Lease Active Kingdom Maven Parking Maven Detroit- United Detroit-647 Lothrop Lothrop-Fisher Michigan North America Parking Lease Active States Street Garage Maven Parking Maven Detroit- United Detroit-Baltimore Michigan North America Parking Lease Active Baltimore Garage States Garage Property Property Property Property Site Name Property Name State Region Site Status Country Use Ownership Province Maven Detroit- Maven Detroit- United Michigan Avenue- Michigan Avenue- Michigan North America Parking Lease Active States Federal Place Lot Federal Place Lot Cruise Automation - Cruise Automation - United California North America Other Lease Active 346 9th Street 346 9th Street States GM India - GMTCI GM India - GMTCI AC Delco AC Delco Tamil Nadu India International Warehouse Lease Active Coimbatore PDC Coimbatore PDC Maven Parking-Los Maven-Los Angeles- United Angeles-11340 West West Olympic California North America Parking Lease Active States Olympic Boulevard Boulevard

Shop/Lab/T Workshop Lab Workshop Lab - Israel International Lease Active est United Bundled Northgate Northgate Michigan North America Warehouse Active States Service GM India - GMTCI GM India - GMTCI Andhra Bundled AC Delco Hyderabad AC Delco Hyderabad India International Warehouse Active Pradesh Service PDC PDC GM Egypt - GMNA - GM Egypt - GMNA - Cairo Egypt International Office Lease Active Tower 37 Tower 37 Cruise Automation - Cruise Automation - United Washington North America Engineering Lease Active 139th Avenue SE 139th Avenue SE States

Maven Parking-City Maven-City of of Detroit Pilot Car Detroit Pilot Car United Michigan North America Parking Lease Active Share Program- Share Program- States Bagley and Trumbull Bagley and Trumbull

Maven Parking-City Maven-City of of Detroit Pilot Car Detroit Pilot Car United Michigan North America Parking Lease Active Share Program- Share Program- States Woodward and Cli Woodward and Cli Maven Parking-City Maven-City of of Detroit Pilot Car Detroit Pilot Car United Michigan North America Parking Lease Active Share Program- Share Program- States Woodward and Ada Woodward and Ada Maven Parking-City Maven-City of of Detroit Pilot Car Detroit Pilot Car United Michigan North America Parking Lease Active Share Program- Share Program- States Warren and Secon Warren and Secon Maven Parking-City Maven-City of of Detroit Pilot Car Detroit Pilot Car United Michigan North America Parking Lease Active Share Program- Share Program- States Prentis Building Prentis Building Maven Parking-City Maven-City of of Detroit Pilot Car Detroit Pilot Car United Michigan North America Parking Lease Active Share Program- Share Program- States Vernor and Caval Vernor and Caval GM India - GMTCI GM India - GMTCI WeWork BlueOne Haryana India International Office Lease Active BlueOne Square Square

CVO - GLS - Wilson CVO - GLS - Wilson Bundled Ontario Canada North America Other Active Road Road - Units 1 and 2 Service Vacaville CA Motors Vacaville CA Motors United North America - California Retail Lease Active Holding Dealership Holding Dealership States Dealerships Property Property Property Property Site Name Property Name State Region Site Status Country Use Ownership Province Calgary Zone Office Blackfoot Trail - and Regional Alberta Canada North America Office Lease Active Office Training Center San Luis Potosi San Luis Potosi Recruitment Center Recruitment Center San Luis Mexico North America Other Lease Active Service Contract Service Contract Potosi (Museum) (Museum)

Cruise Automation - Cruise Automation - United San Francisco - 640 San Francisco - 640 California North America Warehouse Lease Active States Cesar Chavez Street Cesar Chavez

Charlotte NC Motors South Boulevard - North United North America - Retail Lease Active Holding Dealership Dealership Property Carolina States Dealerships GM Financial - GM Financial - Massachuse United Boston Branch Boston Branch North America Office Lease Active tts States Office 4 Office 4 GM China - GM China - Guangzhou Branch Guangzhou Branch Guangzhou China GM China Office Lease Active Office Office Nashville - GM Nashville - GM United Public Policy Office Public Policy Office Tennessee North America Office Lease Active States 2 2

Cruise Automation - Cruise Automation - United San Francisco - 800 San Francisco - 800 California North America Parking Lease Active States Cesar Chavez Street Cesar Chavez

Farmington Hills Sellers Automotive United Motors Holding Michigan North America Retail Lease Active Inc. States Dealership XPO Subtropolis XPO Subtropolis United Bundled Space - Building 80A-Space - Building 80A-Missouri North America Warehouse Active States Service S S United DMAX - Dayton, OH DMAX - Dayton, OH Ohio North America Other Lease Active States United Bundled Jasco Warehouse Jasco Warehouse Michigan North America Warehouse Active States Service Maven Parking Maven Detroit-22 United Detroit-22 West West Milwaukee Michigan North America Parking Lease Active States Milwaukee Avenue Avenue Maven Parking Maven Detroit-44 United Detroit-44 West Michigan North America Parking Lease Active West Forest Avenue States Forest Avenue Maven Parking Maven Detroit-4724- United Detroit-4724-4730 Michigan North America Parking Lease Active 4730 Cass Avenue States Cass Avenue Beverly Hills AHLLC Beverly Hills Cadillac United North America - California Retail Lease Active Service Center Service 2 States Dealerships Maven Parking Maven Detroit-13560 United Detroit-13560 East East McNichols Michigan North America Parking Lease Active States McNichols Road Road OnStar Luton - OnStar Luton - United Training Regus Workplace Regus Workplace England North America Lease Active Kingdom Center Recovery Recovery United Manufacturi DMAX Brookville DMAX Brookville Ohio North America Own Active States ng Property Property Property Property Site Name Property Name State Region Site Status Country Use Ownership Province Maven Parking Maven-Unit Park - Toronto - 1540 Bloor Ontario Canada North America Parking Lease Active Bloor Street West Street West Sterling Heights - Sterling Heights - United Bundled Michigan North America Warehouse Active ESYS Automation ESYS Automation States Service Bundled Cadillac LIVE Stuido Cadillac LIVE Stuido Ontario Canada North America Other Active Service PATAC PATAC Engineering Administration Shanghai China GM China Engineering Joint Venture Active Building PATAC Engineering PATAC Shop Shanghai China GM China Engineering Joint Venture Active GMK Direct Sales GMK Direct Sales Korea, Regional HQ - Regional HQ - Daejeon International Office Lease Active Republic Of Daejeon Daejeon United North America - Santa Clara Cadillac Santa Clara Cadillac California Retail Lease Active States Dealerships GMH - Servcorp GMH - Servcorp New South Office - Macquarie Office - Macquarie Australia International Office Lease Active Wales Park, Sydney Park, Sydney

Maven Parking - San San Diego-625 United California North America Parking Lease Active Diego-625 Broadway Broadway States Maven Parking Los Los Angeles-631 United Angeles-631 West California North America Parking Lease Active West Jefferson States Jefferson KETT Engineering KETT Engineering United Arizona North America ESL Lease Active Facility Facility States GMH Queensland GMH Queensland Queensland Australia International Office Lease Active TC/Zone Office TC/Zone Office Design Photographic Design Photographic United Shop/Lab/T Michigan North America Own Active Studio Studio States est Long Island City United North America - Vacant Parking Lot New York Retail Own Active AHLLC Dealership States Dealerships Long Island City Long Island City United North America - New York Retail Own Active AHLLC Dealership Service Center States Dealerships Long Island City Major World United North America - New York Retail Own Active AHLLC Dealership Chevrolet States Dealerships Long Island City United North America - Major Chevrolet New York Retail Own Active AHLLC Dealership States Dealerships Long Island City City Cadillac Buick United North America - New York Retail Own Active AHLLC Dealership GMC States Dealerships Forest Hills AHLLC United North America - Sunrise Chevrolet New York Retail Own Active Dealership States Dealerships Forest Hills AHLLC United North America - Vacant Land New York Land Own Active Dealership States Dealerships Forest Hills AHLLC United North America - Used Car Lot New York Land Own Active Dealership States Dealerships Ypsilanti - Willow Plant 57 - Parts Dist United Michigan North America Warehouse Lease Active Run CCA PDC & PC Ctr & Processing Ctr States

Ypsilanti - Willow Plant 87 - Parts Dist United Michigan North America Warehouse Lease Active Run CCA PDC & PC Ctr & Processing Ctr States New York Manhattan United GM Building (Old) New York North America Office Lease Active Office States Toledo - CKD Vacant Land Pichincha Ecuador South America Land Own Active Storage Yard Property Property Property Property Site Name Property Name State Region Site Status Country Use Ownership Province GM Ecuador - Abedrabbo Storage Abedrabbo Storage Pichincha Ecuador South America Land Lease Active Yard Yard GM Ecuador - CKD Vacant Land Pichincha Ecuador South America Land Own Active Storage Yard Sofitel Tower - GM GM Egypt - HQ Cairo Egypt International Office Lease Active NA HQ Oshawa Employee Vacant Land Ontario Canada North America Land Lease Active Parking Lot Sainte Foy Training Lavoisier - Training Training Quebec Canada North America Lease Active Center Center Center Krung Thep GM Thailand and GM Thailand and Maha Training Chevrolet Sales Chevrolet Sales Thailand International Lease Active Nakhon Center Thailand Ltd. Thailand Ltd. [Bangkok] GM AMEO - GM AMEO - United Arab Dubai International Office Lease Active Headquarters Headquarters Emirates GM Financial IO - GM Financial IO - Sao Paulo Brazil South America Office Lease Active South America South America GM Financial IO - Banks Sao Paulo Brazil South America Office Lease Active South America GM Financial IO - Electrical Substation Sao Paulo Brazil South America Office Lease Active South America GM Financial IO - Main Gate Sao Paulo Brazil South America Office Lease Active South America GM Financial IO - Vehicle Gate Sao Paulo Brazil South America Office Lease Active South America GM Financial IO - Underground Water Sao Paulo Brazil South America Office Lease Active South America Tank GM India - Technical ITPL - Creator Bldg Karnataka India International Office Lease Active Center Office GM India - Technical ITPL - Discoverer Karnataka India International Office Lease Active Center Bldg Office GM India - Technical ITPL - Innovator Karnataka India International Office Lease Active Center Bldg Office Alpharetta US-SSM Alpharetta US-SSM United Southeast Regional Southeast Regional Georgia North America Office Lease Active States Office Office

GM Thailand - CST Service and Training Service Vehicle Maintenance Nonthaburi Thailand International Own Active Center Center and Training Center

Mobile AHLLC United North America - U-J Chevrolet Alabama Retail Lease Active Dealership States Dealerships AutoNation Mesa AHLLC United North America - Chevrolet Arizona Retail Lease Active Dealership 1 States Dealerships Superstition Springs AutoNation Peoria AHLLC United North America - Chevrolet Arizona Retail Lease Active Dealership States Dealerships Arrowhead Bakersfield AHLLC Motor City Buick United North America - California Retail Lease Active Dealership GMC States Dealerships Buena Park AHLLC United North America - Simpson Buick GMC California Retail Lease Active Dealership States Dealerships Cerritos AHLLC Penske Buick GMC United North America - California Retail Lease Active Dealership 2 of Cerritos (Service) States Dealerships Property Property Property Property Site Name Property Name State Region Site Status Country Use Ownership Province Cerritos AHLLC Penske Buick GMC United North America - California Retail Own Active Dealership 3 of Cerritos States Dealerships Concord AHLLC United North America - Concord Chevrolet California Retail Lease Active Dealership States Dealerships Dublin AHLLC United North America - Dublin Buick GMC California Retail Lease Active Dealership 1 States Dealerships Elk Grove AHLLC United North America - Maita Chevrolet California Retail Lease Active Dealership 2 States Dealerships Elk Grove AHLLC Elk Grove Buick United North America - California Retail Lease Active Dealership 1 GMC States Dealerships Folsom AHLLC United North America - Folsom Buick GMC California Retail Lease Active Dealership States Dealerships Folsom AHLLC United North America - Folsom Chevrolet California Retail Lease Active Dealership States Dealerships Glendora AHLLC United North America - Glendora Chevrolet California Retail Own Active Dealership States Dealerships Indio AHLLC Coachella Valley United North America - California Retail Lease Active Dealership Buick GMC States Dealerships Moreno Valley Moss Brothers United North America - California Retail Lease Active AHLLC Dealership 1 Chevrolet States Dealerships Northridge AHLLC Competition United North America - California Retail Own Active Dealership 1 Chevrolet States Dealerships Riverside AHLLC United North America - Riverside Chevrolet California Retail Lease Active Dealership 2 States Dealerships Santa Clarita AHLLC Stevens Creek United North America - California Retail Own Active Dealership 2 Chevrolet States Dealerships Santa Clarita AHLLC United North America - Vacant Land California Land Lease Active Dealership 2 States Dealerships Santa Barbara Bunnin Chevrolet- United North America - California Retail Lease Active AHLLC Dealership Cadillac States Dealerships Santa Clarita AHLLC Parkway Cadillac United North America - California Retail Lease Active Dealership 1 GMC States Dealerships Stockton AHLLC Mataga Buick GMC United North America - California Retail Lease Active Dealership Cadillac States Dealerships Temecula AHLLC Temecula Buick United North America - California Retail Lease Active Dealership GMC States Dealerships Penske Cadillac Torrance AHLLC United North America - Buick GMC California Retail Own Active Dealership 2 States Dealerships Southbay Tustin AHLLC United North America - Tustin BG California Retail Lease Active Dealership 1 States Dealerships Lone Tree AHLLC AutoNation Buick United North America - Colorado Retail Own Active Dealership GMC States Dealerships Fairfield AHLLC Maritime Motors of United North America - Connecticut Retail Lease Active Dealership Fairfield (Chevrolet) States Dealerships Milford AHLLC Bob`s of Milford United North America - Connecticut Retail Lease Active Dealership (Buick GMC) States Dealerships North Riverside United North America - Castle Buick GMC Illinois Retail Lease Active AHLLC Dealership States Dealerships Jack Schmitt O`Fallon AHLLC United North America - Chevrolet of Illinois Retail Lease Active Dealership 1 States Dealerships O`Fallon O`Fallon AHLLC Jack Schmitt United North America - Illinois Retail Lease Active Dealership 2 Cadillac States Dealerships Tinley Park AHLLC Rizza Cadillac Buick United North America - Illinois Retail Lease Active Dealership GMC States Dealerships Property Property Property Property Site Name Property Name State Region Site Status Country Use Ownership Province Fort Wayne AHLLC United North America - Tom Kelley Cadillac Indiana Retail Lease Active Dealership States Dealerships Fort Wayne AHLLC United North America - Kelley Buick GMC Indiana Retail Lease Active Dealership States Dealerships Robert Brogden Olathe AHLLC United North America - Auto Plaza (Buick Kansas Retail Lease Active Dealership States Dealerships GMC) Bossier City AHLLC Morgan Buick GMC United North America - Louisiana Retail Lease Active Dealership Bossier States Dealerships Shreveport AHLLC Morgan Buick GMC United North America - Louisiana Retail Lease Active Dealership Shreveport States Dealerships White Marsh AHLLC Koons White Marsh United North America - Maryland Retail Lease Active Dealership Chevrolet States Dealerships Danvers AHLLC Herb Chambers Massachuse United North America - Retail Lease Active Dealership Chevrolet Cadillac tts States Dealerships Framingham AHLLC Herb Connolly Massachuse United North America - Retail Lease Active Dealership Chevrolet tts States Dealerships Hanover AHLLC Massachuse United North America - Prime Buick GMC Retail Lease Active Dealership tts States Dealerships Norwood AHLLC Cadillac Village of Massachuse United North America - Retail Lease Active Dealership Norwood tts States Dealerships Westborough Westborough Buick Massachuse United North America - Retail Lease Active AHLLC Dealership 2 GMC tts States Dealerships Taylor AHLLC United North America - Taylor Chevrolet Michigan Retail Lease Active Dealership States Dealerships Woodhaven AHLLC Michael Bates United North America - Michigan Retail Lease Active Dealership Chevrolet States Dealerships Bloomington AHLLC Walser Buick GMC - United North America - Minnesota Retail Own Active Dealership Bloomington States Dealerships Coon Rapids AHLLC McCarthy Auto United North America - Minnesota Retail Lease Active Dealership World (Buick GMC) States Dealerships Southaven AHLLC Jimmy Gray United North America - Mississippi Retail Lease Active Dealership Chevrolet States Dealerships Herculaneum Sapaugh Motors, United North America - Missouri Retail Lease Active AHLLC Dealership Inc. Buick GMC States Dealerships Herculaneum Sapaugh Chevrolet United North America - Missouri Retail Lease Active AHLLC Dealership Cadillac States Dealerships Cable-Dahmer Independence United North America - Chevrolet (Main Missouri Retail Lease Active AHLLC Dealership 2 States Dealerships Dealership) Cable-Dahmer Independence United North America - Chevrolet (Body Missouri Retail Lease Active AHLLC Dealership 2 States Dealerships Shop) Cedar Knolls AHLLC DeMaio Holdings United North America - New Jersey Retail Lease Active Dealership Incorporated States Dealerships Clifton AHLLC Schumacher United North America - New Jersey Retail Lease Active Dealership Chevrolet of Clifton States Dealerships Englewood AHLLC Englewood Auto United North America - New Jersey Retail Lease Active Dealership 2 Group (Buick) States Dealerships Englewood AHLLC Englewood Auto United North America - New Jersey Retail Lease Active Dealership 2 Group (Chevrolet) States Dealerships Lawrenceville Coleman Buick GMC United North America - New Jersey Retail Own Active AHLLC Dealership Cadillac States Dealerships Lawrenceville Ciocca Chevrolet of United North America - New Jersey Retail Own Active AHLLC Dealership Princeton States Dealerships Little Falls AHLLC United North America - McGuire Buick GMC New Jersey Retail Lease Active Dealership States Dealerships Property Property Property Property Site Name Property Name State Region Site Status Country Use Ownership Province Mahwah AHLLC Buick GMC of United North America - New Jersey Retail Lease Active Dealership Mahwah States Dealerships Marlton AHLLC United North America - Elkins Chevrolet New Jersey Retail Lease Active Dealership States Dealerships Old Bridge AHLLC Quality Chevrolet, United North America - New Jersey Retail Lease Active Dealership Inc. States Dealerships Paramus AHLLC United North America - Paramus Chevrolet New Jersey Retail Lease Active Dealership States Dealerships Union AHLLC MJC Auto United North America - New Jersey Retail Lease Active Dealership 1 Enterprises States Dealerships Union AHLLC MJC Auto United North America - New Jersey Retail Lease Active Dealership 2 Enterprises States Dealerships Woodbridge AHLLC United North America - Miller Buick GMC New Jersey Retail Own Active Dealership States Dealerships Woodbridge AHLLC United North America - McGuire Cadillac New Jersey Retail Own Active Dealership States Dealerships Albuquerque AHLLC United North America - Quality Buick GMC New Mexico Retail Lease Active Dealership States Dealerships Clifton Park AHLLC United North America - Northstar Chevrolet New York Retail Lease Active Dealership States Dealerships Douglaston AHLLC United North America - East Hills Chevrolet New York Retail Lease Active Dealership States Dealerships Medford AHLLC United North America - Chevrolet 112 New York Retail Lease Active Dealership States Dealerships Mt. Kisco AHLLC Arroway Chevrolet United North America - New York Retail Own Active Dealership Cadillac States Dealerships Nanuet AHLLC Grandprize-Buick United North America - New York Retail Lease Active Dealership GMC States Dealerships Orchard Park West Herr Chevrolet United North America - New York Retail Lease Active AHLLC Dealership of Orchard Park States Dealerships Orchard Park Robert Basil Buick United North America - New York Retail Lease Active AHLLC Dealership GMC Cadillac States Dealerships Poughkeepsie Hudson Cadillac United North America - New York Retail Lease Active AHLLC Dealership 2 Buick GMC States Dealerships Rockville Center United North America - Morrissey GMC New York Retail Lease Active AHLLC Dealership States Dealerships Smithtown AHLLC King O`Rourke United North America - New York Retail Lease Active Dealership Cadillac Buick GMC States Dealerships Staten Island AHLLC United North America - Manfredi Chevrolet New York Retail Lease Active Dealership States Dealerships Valley Stream Bical Chevrolet of United North America - New York Retail Lease Active AHLLC Dealership Valley Stream States Dealerships Bismarck AHLLC North United North America - Puklich Chevrolet Retail Lease Active Dealership Dakota States Dealerships Cincinnati AHLLC McCluskey United North America - Ohio Retail Lease Active Dealership 2 Chevrolet States Dealerships Columbus AHLLC Dan Tobin Buick United North America - Ohio Retail Lease Active Dealership GMC States Dealerships Strongsville AHLLC Serpentini Chevrolet United North America - Ohio Retail Lease Active Dealership of Strongsville States Dealerships Oklahoma City David Stanley United North America - Oklahoma Retail Lease Active AHLLC Dealership Chevrolet States Dealerships Beaverton AHLLC United North America - Carr Chevrolet Oregon Retail Lease Active Dealership States Dealerships Ardmore AHLLC Armen Chevrolet of Pennsylvani United North America - Retail Lease Active Dealership Ardmore a States Dealerships Property Property Property Property Site Name Property Name State Region Site Status Country Use Ownership Province Media AHLLC Granite Run Buick Pennsylvani United North America - Retail Lease Active Dealership 1 GMC a States Dealerships Greenville AHLLC Kevin Whitaker South United North America - Retail Lease Active Dealership Chevrolet Cadillac Carolina States Dealerships Bartlett AHLLC Sunrise Buick GMC United North America - Tennessee Retail Lease Active Dealership at Wolfchase States Dealerships Dallas AHLLC United North America - Friendly Chevrolet Texas Retail Lease Active Dealership 2 States Dealerships El Paso AHLLC United North America - Bravo Cadillac Texas Retail Lease Active Dealership 1 States Dealerships Garland AHLLC United North America - Jupiter Chevrolet Texas Retail Lease Active Dealership States Dealerships Jersey Village United North America - Lone Star Chevrolet Texas Retail Lease Active AHLLC Dealership States Dealerships North Salt Lake Jerry Seiner Buick United North America - Utah Retail Lease Active AHLLC Dealership GMC Bountiful States Dealerships Salt Lake City Jerry Seiner United North America - Utah Retail Lease Active AHLLC Dealership 1 Chevrolet Cadillac States Dealerships South Jordan Jerry Seiner South United North America - Utah Retail Lease Active AHLLC Dealership Jordan Buick GMC States Dealerships Everett AHLLC United North America - Chevrolet of Everett Washington Retail Lease Active Dealership States Dealerships Issaquah AHLLC Evergreen Chevrolet United North America - Washington Retail Own Active Dealership of Issaquah States Dealerships Renton AHLLC United North America - Good Chevrolet Washington Retail Lease Active Dealership States Dealerships Greenfield AHLLC John Paul`s United North America - Wisconsin Retail Lease Active Dealership Automotive (GMC) States Dealerships Menomonee Falls United North America - Vacant Dealership Wisconsin Retail Own Active AHLLC Dealership States Dealerships West Bend AHLLC Heiser Chevrolet United North America - Wisconsin Retail Lease Active Dealership Cadillac States Dealerships PATAC Shop Administration Bldg Shanghai China GM China Office Own Active Shop/Lab/T PATAC Shop Shop Shanghai China GM China Own Active est Adelaide ASSY, Plant 1 -Zone L; South Manufacturi Australia International Lease Active STPG Plant 1 -Zone M Australia ng Adelaide ASSY, South Manufacturi Plant 3 Australia International Own Active STPG Australia ng Plant 7 and Plant 7 Adelaide ASSY, South Manufacturi Waste Management Australia International Own Active STPG Australia ng Area Adelaide ASSY, South Manufacturi Plant 8 Australia International Own Active STPG Australia ng Adelaide ASSY, South Plant 4 West Australia International Warehouse Lease Active STPG Australia Adelaide ASSY, South Plant 4 West Australia International Warehouse Lease Active STPG Australia Adelaide ASSY, South Plant 4 West Australia International Warehouse Lease Active STPG Australia Adelaide ASSY, South Plant 4 West Australia International Warehouse Lease Active STPG Australia Adelaide ASSY, Plant 4 East - South Australia International Warehouse Lease Active STPG Tooling Storage Australia Adelaide ASSY, Plant 4 East - South Australia International Warehouse Lease Active STPG Tooling Storage Australia Property Property Property Property Site Name Property Name State Region Site Status Country Use Ownership Province Adelaide ASSY, Plant 4 East - South Australia International Warehouse Lease Active STPG Tooling Storage Australia Adelaide ASSY, Plant 4 East - South Australia International Warehouse Lease Active STPG Tooling Storage Australia Plant 2 General Adelaide ASSY, Assembly - Zone E; South Australia International Warehouse Lease Active STPG Plant 2 Generally Australia Assembly - Zone F Plant 2 General Adelaide ASSY, Assembly - Zone E; South Australia International Warehouse Lease Active STPG Plant 2 Generally Australia Assembly - Zone F Plant 2 General Adelaide ASSY, Assembly - Zone E; South Australia International Warehouse Lease Active STPG Plant 2 Generally Australia Assembly - Zone F Plant 2 General Adelaide ASSY, Assembly - Zone E; South Australia International Warehouse Lease Active STPG Plant 2 Generally Australia Assembly - Zone F Simi Valley AHLLC Simi Valley Buick United North America - California Retail Lease Active Dealership GMC States Dealerships Gurnee AHLLC Anthony Auto Group United North America - Illinois Retail Lease Active Dealership Buick GMC States Dealerships Vancouver Dueck Chevrolet British North America - Canada Retail Lease Active Dealership 2 Cadillac Columbia Dealerships Vacaville AHLLC United North America - Vacaville BG California Retail Lease Active Dealership States Dealerships Victorville AHLLC United North America - Greiner Buick GMC California Retail Lease Active Dealership 2 States Dealerships GM Korea - Gunsan Korea, Dormitory A-1 Jeollabuk-do International Residential Joint Venture Active Dormitory Republic Of GM Korea - Gunsan Korea, Dormitory A-2 Jeollabuk-do International Residential Joint Venture Active Dormitory Republic Of GM Korea - Gunsan Korea, Dormitory B Jeollabuk-do International Residential Joint Venture Active Dormitory Republic Of GM Korea - Gunsan Korea, Dormitory C-1 Jeollabuk-do International Residential Joint Venture Active Dormitory Republic Of GM Korea - Gunsan Korea, Dormitory C-2 Jeollabuk-do International Residential Joint Venture Active Dormitory Republic Of GM Korea - Gunsan Korea, Dormitory D Jeollabuk-do International Residential Joint Venture Active Dormitory Republic Of GM Korea - Gunsan Dormitory Dining Korea, Jeollabuk-do International Residential Joint Venture Active Dormitory Hall Republic Of GM Korea - Gunsan Korea, Dormitory Utility Jeollabuk-do International Residential Joint Venture Active Dormitory Republic Of GM Korea - Gunsan Korea, Dormitory Govenor Jeollabuk-do International Residential Joint Venture Active Dormitory Republic Of GM Korea - Gunsan Dormitory Korea, Jeollabuk-do International Residential Joint Venture Active Dormitory Connection Way Republic Of GM Korea - Gunsan Korea, Dormitory Substation Jeollabuk-do International Residential Joint Venture Active Dormitory Republic Of GM Korea - Gunsan Dormitory Guard Korea, Jeollabuk-do International Residential Joint Venture Active Dormitory House #1 Republic Of GM Korea - Gunsan Dormitory Guard Korea, Jeollabuk-do International Residential Joint Venture Active Dormitory House #2 Republic Of Property Property Property Property Site Name Property Name State Region Site Status Country Use Ownership Province GM Korea - Gunsan Dormitory Pump Korea, Jeollabuk-do International Residential Joint Venture Active Dormitory Room Republic Of Matzinger Matzinger United Ohio North America Warehouse Lease Active Warehouse Warehouse States GM Korea - Incheon Korea, Incheon PDC Incheon International Warehouse Lease Active PDC Republic Of Denville AHLLC Gearhart Chevrolet United North America - New Jersey Retail Lease Active Dealership of Denville States Dealerships Englewood Cliffs United North America - Englewood Cadillac New Jersey Retail Own Active AHLLC Dealership States Dealerships Barnes Wheaton GM South Surrey British North America - Surrey Dealership Canada Retail Lease Active (Chevrolet Buick Columbia Dealerships GMC) National City AHLLC United North America - Vacant Dealership California Retail Lease Active Dealership States Dealerships Brooklyn AHLLC United North America - Bay Ridge Chevrolet New York Retail Own Active Dealership States Dealerships Longueuil Action Chevrolet North America - Quebec Canada Retail Lease Active Dealership Buick GMC Dealerships Desert Auto Plaza El Centro AHLLC United North America - Chevrolet Buick California Retail Lease Active Dealership States Dealerships Cadillac GMC North America - Sarnia Dealership Park Lane Chevrolet Ontario Canada Retail Lease Active Dealerships GM Wintergarden United Auction Office Florida North America Office Lease Active Car Office States Washington - GM Republic Square 1 - District of United North America Office Lease Active Public Policy Office Office Columbia States Pasadena AHLLC United North America - Thorson Buick GMC California Retail Lease Active Dealership States Dealerships Miami AHLLC United North America - Bomnin Chevrolet Florida Retail Own Active Dealership 3 States Dealerships Rochelle Park United North America - The Tile Shoppe New Jersey Retail Lease Active AHLLC Dealership States Dealerships Dan Courville North America - Sudbury Dealership Chevrolet Buick Ontario Canada Retail Lease Active Dealerships GMC Denis Breton Saint-Eustache North America - Chevrolet Buick Quebec Canada Retail Lease Active Dealership Dealerships GMC Sherbrooke Thibault Chevrolet North America - Quebec Canada Retail Lease Active Dealership Cadillac Buick GMC Dealerships Vancouver Dueck-Chevrolet British North America - Canada Retail Lease Active Dealership Buick GMC Columbia Dealerships Markham Dealership North America - Eastside Chevrolet Ontario Canada Retail Lease Active 2 Dealerships Florence AHLLC United North America - Tom Gill Chevrolet Kentucky Retail Lease Active Dealership 2 States Dealerships Chesterfield CCA Marine Engine Shop United Shop/Lab/T Marine Engine Shop Michigan North America Lease Active / Lab States est / Lab

Chicago AHLLC Mike Anderson United North America - Illinois Retail Lease Active Dealership 2 Chevrolet of Chicago States Dealerships GM Peru - Headquarters Lima Peru South America Office Lease Active Headquarters Property Property Property Property Site Name Property Name State Region Site Status Country Use Ownership Province Renton Cadillac Renton Cadillac United North America - Washington Retail Lease Active GMC GMC States Dealerships MEDC - Regional MEDC - Regional United Arab Parts Distribution Parts Distribution Dubai International Warehouse Own Active Emirates Centre Centre GM China - PR SK Towers - BJ Beijing China GM China Office Lease Active Office Office GM Korea - Korea, Bupyeong Gajeong Gajeong Dormitory Incheon International Residential Own Active Republic Of Dormitory Philadelphia AHLLC Pennsylvani United North America - Hessert Chevrolet Retail Lease Active Dealership a States Dealerships Nuerburging - Rheinland- Shop/Lab/T Meuspath Workshop Germany North America Lease Active Workshop Pfalz est Company Vehicle Warren Company United Administration & Michigan North America Office Lease Active Vehicle Operations States Distribution Facility GM Korea - KD Korea, KD Shop Jeollabuk-do International Warehouse Own Active Center Republic Of GM Korea - KD Korea, KD Substation Jeollabuk-do International Warehouse Own Active Center Republic Of GM Korea - KD Korea, KD Guard House #1 Jeollabuk-do International Warehouse Own Active Center Republic Of GM Korea - KD Korea, KD Guard House #2 Jeollabuk-do International Warehouse Own Active Center Republic Of GM Korea - KD Korea, KD Pump Room #1 Jeollabuk-do International Warehouse Own Active Center Republic Of GM Korea - KD Korea, KD Dining Hall Jeollabuk-do International Warehouse Own Active Center Republic Of Diamond Auto Group Auburn AHLLC Massachuse United North America - (Chevrolet Buick Retail Lease Active Dealership tts States Dealerships Cadillac) Region GM Chile - Santiago Metropolitan Parts Warehouse Chile South America Warehouse Lease Active PDC a de Santiago Fremont AHLLC Fremont Cadillac United North America - California Retail Lease Active Dealership 1 Buick GMC States Dealerships Mexico City GMM Dealership - Mexico Mexico North America Retail Lease Active Dealership Surman Anzures GM Korea - Changwon Gyeongsang Korea, Daewoo Apartment International Residential Own Active Apartment and nam-do Republic Of Dormitory Dublin AHLLC Dublin Chevrolet United North America - California Retail Lease Active Dealership 2 Cadillac States Dealerships Huntington Station Chevrolet of United North America - New York Retail Lease Active AHLLC Dealership 1 Huntington States Dealerships GM Korea - Daewoo Chungcheon Korea, Daewoo Apartment International Residential Own Active Apartment gnam-do Republic Of GM Korea - Hyundai Chungcheon Korea, Hyundai Apartment International Residential Own Active Apartment gnam-do Republic Of Richmond Dueck Lansdown British North America - Canada Retail Lease Active Dealership Buick Columbia Dealerships GM Ecuador - Las Parts Warehouse Pichincha Ecuador South America Warehouse Own Active Acacias PDC Property Property Property Property Site Name Property Name State Region Site Status Country Use Ownership Province

Holden New Zealand New HQ & CCA PDC Auckland International Warehouse Lease Active - HQ & CCA PDC Zealand Bedford Residential United Collins Residence Indiana North America Residential Own Active Properties States Bedford Residential United Neal Residence Indiana North America Residential Own Active Properties States Bedford Residential United Barlow Residence Indiana North America Residential Own Active Properties States Bedford Residential United Owens Residence Indiana North America Residential Own Active Properties States Bedford Residential Reynolds/Miller United Indiana North America Residential Own Active Properties Residence States Bedford Residential United Bell Residence Indiana North America Residential Own Active Properties States Shanghai OnStar Telematics Office & Shanghai China GM China Office Joint Venture Active Call Center Call Center Union AHLLC Open Road United North America - New Jersey Retail Lease Active Dealership 3 Chevrolet States Dealerships Poughkeepsie United North America - Healey Chevrolet New York Retail Lease Active AHLLC Dealership 1 States Dealerships Everett AHLLC Clyde Revord Motors United North America - Washington Retail Lease Active Dealership 1 (Buick GMC) States Dealerships Dealership Troy Motors Holding United North America - Liquidations Records Michigan Retail Lease Active Dealership States Dealerships Storage New Rochelle New Rochelle United North America - New York Retail Lease Active AHLLC Dealership 2 Chevrolet States Dealerships Potamkin Cadillac New York AHLLC United North America - Buick Chevrolet New York Retail Lease Active Dealership 1 States Dealerships GMC Yulong Top GM Taiwan - Chinese Technology Building -- GM China Office Lease Active Headquarters Taipei Office

GM Korea - Geomam-dong Korea, Incheon International Residential Lease Active Bupyeong Dormitory Dormitory Republic Of Tashkent SKD Tashkent SKD Manufacturi Tashkent Uzbekistan International Joint Venture Active ASSY ASSY ng FAW-GM Hongta FAW-GM Hongta Manufacturi Yunnan China GM China Joint Venture Active ASSY, STPG ASSY, STPG ng Carter North Schore British North America - 800 Automall Canada Retail Lease Active CBGK Columbia Dealerships GM Peru - Mall Mall Plaza Trujillo La Libertad Peru South America Retail Lease Active Plaza Trujillo GM India - GMTCI GMTCI AC Delco - Bundled Haryana India International Warehouse Active AC Delco Delhi PDC Delhi Service GM Colombia - Cundinamar GMISC Office Colombia South America Office Lease Active GMISC Office ca GM Financial - GM Financial - United Sugarland Branch Sugarland Branch Texas North America Office Lease Active States Office Office GM Financial - GM Financial - United Naperville Branch Naperville Branch Illinois North America Office Lease Active States Office Office Property Property Property Property Site Name Property Name State Region Site Status Country Use Ownership Province GM Financial - So. GM Financial - So. United California Branch California Branch California North America Office Lease Active States Office Office GM Financial - GM Financial - North United Raleigh Branch Raleigh Branch North America Office Lease Active Carolina States Office Office GM Financial - GM Financial - United Texas North America Office Lease Active Corporate Office Corporate Office States GM Financial - GM Financial - North United Huntersville Huntersville North America Office Lease Active Carolina States Collection Center Collection Center GM Financial - GM Financial - Peterborough Peterborough Ontario Canada North America Office Lease Active Collection Center Collection Center GM Financial - GM Financial - United Chandler Collection Chandler Collection Arizona North America Office Lease Active States Center Center GM Financial - GM Financial - United Arlington AOC I Arlington AOC I Texas North America Office Lease Active States Collection Center Collection Center GM Financial - GM Financial - United Arlington AOC II Arlington AOC II Texas North America Office Own Active States Service Facility Service Facility Region GM Chile - Vespucio Metropolitan Mall Plaza Vespucio Chile South America Retail Lease Active Autoplaza a de Santiago Region GM Chile - Mall Metropolitan Mall Plaza Alameda Chile South America Retail Lease Active Plaza Alameda a de Santiago Region GM Chile - Mall Mall Plaza Vespucio Metropolitan Plaza Vespucio & Chile South America Retail Lease Active & Service Center a de Service Center Santiago Region GM Chile - Mall Metropolitan Mall Plaza Norte Chile South America Retail Lease Active Plaza Norte a de Santiago GM Israel - Advance Advance Technical - Israel International Office Lease Active Technical Center Center GM Financial - GM Financial - Ontario Canada North America Office Lease Active Toronto Originations Toronto Originations Hudsonville Motors Todd Wenzel United North America - Michigan Retail Lease Active Holding Dealership Chevrolet States Dealerships GM Korea - Sejong Sejong PDC Korea, Sejong International Residential Own Active City Dormitory Dormitory Republic Of GM Holden - Design 261 Salmon Design Shop/Lab/T Victoria Australia International Lease Active Fabrication Shop Fab & Warehouse est GM India - GMTCI GMTCI Data Centre Karnataka India International Office Lease Active Data Centre GMIT Singapore - GMIT Singapore - Regional Data Regional Data - Singapore International Office Lease Active Centre - Primary Centre - Primary FAW-GM Harbin Manufacturi Stamping Heilongjiang China GM China Joint Venture Active ASSY, STPG ng Property Property Property Property Site Name Property Name State Region Site Status Country Use Ownership Province FAW-GM Harbin Manufacturi Paint Heilongjiang China GM China Joint Venture Active ASSY, STPG ng FAW-GM Harbin Manufacturi General Assembly Heilongjiang China GM China Joint Venture Active ASSY, STPG ng FAW-GM Harbin Manufacturi Frame Heilongjiang China GM China Joint Venture Active ASSY, STPG ng FAW-GM Harbin Manufacturi Sub Station (KD) Heilongjiang China GM China Joint Venture Active ASSY, STPG ng FAW-GM Harbin Manufacturi Administration Heilongjiang China GM China Joint Venture Active ASSY, STPG ng Toledo Motors United North America - Ballas Buick GMC Ohio Retail Lease Active Holding Dealership States Dealerships GM Peru - Mall Mall Plaza Lima Lima Peru South America Retail Lease Active Plaza Lima Norte Norte Doraville ASSY, United Doraville Land Georgia North America Land Own Active STPG 2 States Mansfield Motors Mansfield Motors United North America - Ohio Retail Lease Active Holding Dealership Holding Dealership States Dealerships VERIFICATION REPORT – 2019 GREENHOUSE GAS AND SUSTAINABILITY DATA ASSERTIONSGENERAL MOTORS COMPANY – GLOBAL FACILITIES

Appendix B Initial Verification and Sampling Plan July 10, 2020

Appendix B INITIAL VERIFICATION AND SAMPLING PLAN

Stantec Consulting Ltd. 100-300 Hagey Blvd, Waterloo, ON N2L 0A4

VIA EMAIL: [email protected] CONFIDENTIAL

May 14, 2020 File: 160900942

Attention: Anna M. Prodin, Manager – GM 2100 General Motors Company, 30400 VanDyke Avenue, Warren, MI 48093

Dear Ms. Prodin,

Reference: Verification and Sampling Plan - General Motors – Global Facilities 2019 GHG & Sustainability Data

INITIAL VERIFICATION PLAN

INTRODUCTION

Stantec Consulting Ltd. (Stantec) was contracted by General Motors Company (GM) to conduct an independent third-party verification of a selection of greenhouse gas (GHG) and sustainability data assertions (the Assertions) for their Global Facilities, including:

• Total Scope 1, 2, and 3 GHG emissions • Total energy consumption (including renewables) • Total water withdrawal • Total waste • Total production • Year over year performance • Renewable energy use • Landfill-free facilities

GM Global reports on these assertions under the following voluntary programs (the Reporting Programs):

• The Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) • The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)

The GM global facilities are located in various regions around the world and operate under the following operational boundaries: GM International Operations (GMIO), GM South America (GMSA), and GM North America (GMNA). GM does not include all facilities in the reporting boundary and these exclusions have yet to be provided to Stantec for transparency.

In this work, GM is responsible for the collection of activity data used in the calculations, data management, completion of the calculations, and preparation of the report that contains the Assertions. Stantec is responsible for completing the verification to a limited level of assurance.

Stantec has completed the initial desktop review of the available Assertions and supporting information provided. The scope of the engagement and the planned verification procedures are provided in this Verification and Sampling Plan. The Verification and Sampling Plan also provides a list of data and documentation required to complete the planned procedures.

Design with community in mind

May 14, 2020 Anna M. Prodin, Manager – GM 2100 CONFIDENTIAL Page 2

Reference: Verification and Sampling Plan - General Motors – Global Facilities 2019 GHG & Sustainability Data

VERIFICATION FUNDAMENTALS

The verification objectives, criteria, standards, level of assurance, materiality threshold, and period are presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Verification Fundamentals

Parameter Description Intended User The results of the verification will be used by GM for internal and external sustainability reporting, and for reporting to CDP and GRI. The users of the Verification Report and statement are GM, shareholders and the public. Verification The objective of the verification is to assess whether the Assertions for GM’s 2019 Objectives operations are accurately prepared in accordance with appropriate criteria. Verification The boundaries of the verification include GM owned and operated facilities within Boundaries General Motors North America (GMNA), General Motors South America (GMSA) and General Motors International Operations (GMIO). A subset of these facilities have been excluded from the Assertions and these exclusions have yet to be provided to Stantec for transparency. Reporting Period The verification is being conducted for the period of January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019. Verification Criteria • ISO 14064 Greenhouses Gases – Part 1: Specification with guidance at the organization level for quantification and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions and removals, 2006; • World Resources Institute (WRI)/World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (Revised Edition), March 2004; • WRI/WBCSD, Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and Reporting Standard; • WRI/WBCSD, GHG Protocol Scope 2 Guidance: An Amendment to the GHG Corporate Standard; • CDP Guidance for the 2019 reporting year (CDP Guidance); and • GRI Sustainability Reporting Guidelines (2011). Verification The verification is being conducted in accordance with ISO14064:3, the AA1000 Standards AccountAbility Principles Standard (2008) and Stantec’s Standard Operating Procedures developed for accreditation to ISO 14065. Level of Assurance Limited Materiality Following best practice, the quantitative materiality threshold has been set at 5%. The Threshold aggregate total of individual discrepancies (understatements and overstatements of total reported values) is compared against the 5% materiality threshold. The materiality of qualitative discrepancies are at the discretion of the Verification Body.

VERIFICATION SCOPE

The following Assertions, presented in Table 2, under GM’s Global Operation’s reporting boundary, are subject to verification by Stantec.

Design with community in mind

May 14, 2020 Anna M. Prodin, Manager – GM 2100 CONFIDENTIAL Page 3

Reference: Verification and Sampling Plan - General Motors – Global Facilities 2019 GHG & Sustainability Data

Table 2 Verification Scope

Area Metric CDP GHG and • Scope 1 Direct GHG Emissions and Energy Use: Energy Reporting − Stationary Combustion GHG emissions [carbon dioxide (CO2), methane Metrics (carbon (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O)] from the combustion of: dioxide equivalent, o Natural gas (CO2, CH4, N2O) CO2e and MWh) o Liquid Petroleum Gas (CO2, CH4, N2O) o Oil and Fuel Oil (CO2, CH4, N2O) o Diesel (CO2, CH4, N2O) o Landfill Gas (CH4, N2O) − Biogenic GHG Emissions from: o Landfill gas combustion (CO2). − Use of Refrigerant, GMNA only (hydrofluorocarbons and perfluorocarbons) − Mobile GHG Emissions, US, Canada, Brazil, China and partial reporting on the rest of the world, from combustion of: o Gasoline (CO2, CH4, N2O) o Diesel (CO2, CH4, N2O) o LPG (CO2, CH4, N2O) • Scope 2 Indirect GHG Emissions and Energy Use: − Indirect electricity, market and location based (CO2, CH4, N2O) − Indirect purchased steam (CO2, CH4, N2O) − Indirect delivered heat (CO2, CH4, N2O) • Scope 3 Other Indirect GHG Emissions and Energy Use: − Purchased goods & services (Category 1) − Capital goods (Category 2) − Fuel and energy related activities not included in Scopes 1 or 2 (Category 3) − Business Travel, air travel only (Category 6) − Use of sold products (Category 11) Other Reporting • Total volume of water withdrawals by source, volumes recycled, and Metrics discharges (m3) • Year over year performance (2019 vs. 2018 for global energy, water & GHG emissions) (%) • Total vehicles produced and reported • Renewable Energy Assertions: − Total renewable energy use (MWh) − Total GHG reductions applied due to renewable energy use (CO2e) − Percentage renewable energy use compared to total electricity use (%) − Number of landfill-free facilities (total, %) GRI Reporting • GRI 302-1 Total Energy Use Metrics • GRI 303-1 Total Water Use • GRI 305-1 Total Scope 1 GHG emissions − 305-2 Total Scope 2 GHG emissions − 305-3 Total Scope 3 GHG emissions

Design with community in mind

May 14, 2020 Anna M. Prodin, Manager – GM 2100 CONFIDENTIAL Page 4

Reference: Verification and Sampling Plan - General Motors – Global Facilities 2019 GHG & Sustainability Data

Area Metric − 305-7 Nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur oxides (SOx), and other significant air emissions) • GRI 306 – Effluents and Waste − 306-2 Total Waste

ASSERTIONS

The objective of the verification is to provide an independent opinion as to whether the 2019 GHG and sustainability data assertions for GM Global facilities meet the Verification Criteria for the period of January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019. The initial assertions provided by GM are summarized below, with the balance yet to be provided.

Table 3 GM 2019 GHG and Sustainability Data Assertions

Parameter Assertion Units Metric tonnes of carbon Scope 1 GHG Emissions - Total 1,392,461 dioxide equivalent (tCO2e)

Scope 2 GHG Emissions (Location Based) 4,332,761 tCO2e

Scope 2 GHG Emissions (Market Based) To be provided (TBP) tCO2e

Scope 3 GHG Emissions Purchased Goods tCO2e TBP and Services (Category 1)

Scope 3 GHG Emissions Capital Goods TBP tCO2e (Category 2)

Scope 3 GHG Emissions Fuel & Energy not in TBP tCO2e Scope 1 & 2 (Category 3)

Scope 3 GHG Emissions Business Travel, Air TBP tCO2e (Category 6)

Scope 3 GHG Emissions Use of Sold Product TBP tCO2e (Category 11) Total Energy Use TBP MWh Total Water Use TBP m3 Total Waste TBP (excluding construction, demolition and 1000 US tons remediation)

Total renewable energy use TBP MWh Total GHG reductions applied due to 3,766,564 tCO2e renewable energy use

Design with community in mind

May 14, 2020 Anna M. Prodin, Manager – GM 2100 CONFIDENTIAL Page 5

Reference: Verification and Sampling Plan - General Motors – Global Facilities 2019 GHG & Sustainability Data

Parameter Assertion Units

Renewable energy use as a percentage of TBP % total electricity use

Number of landfill-free facilities TBP #

Number of landfill-free facilities as a TBP % percentage of total facilities

Year Over Year Performance TBP % Scope 1 & 2 GHG emissions

Year Over Year Performance TBP % Total Energy Use Year Over Year Performance TBP % Total Water Use

GRI 302-1 Total Energy Use TBP MWh

GRI 303-1 Total Water Use TBP m3

GRI 305-1 Total Scope 1 GHG Emissions TBP tCO2e

GRI 305-2 Total Scope 2 GHG Emissions TBP tCO2e

GRI 305-3 Total Scope 3 GHG Emissions TBP tCO2e

GRI 305-7 NOx, SOx and other significant air TBP Metric tonnes emissions

GRI 306-2 Total Waste TBP (excluding construction, demolition and 1000 US tons remediation)

VERIFICATION SCHEDULE

Table 4 presents the planned verification schedule.

Table 4 Verification Schedule*

Activity Responsible Party Date Kick-off Call Stantec / GM January 23, 2020 Submittal of Verification and Sampling Plan May 14, 2020 (including audit scope for all sustainability, Stantec environmental and performance measures)

Design with community in mind

May 14, 2020 Anna M. Prodin, Manager – GM 2100 CONFIDENTIAL Page 6

Reference: Verification and Sampling Plan - General Motors – Global Facilities 2019 GHG & Sustainability Data

Activity Responsible Party Date Provision of Draft Q1-Q3 Environmental March 5, 2020 GM Indicator Data to Stantec Provision of Final Q1-Q4 Energy, Water & May 15, 2020 GM GHG Emissions Data to Stantec Provision of all supporting documents May 15, 2020 requested in Document Request GM Spreadsheet to Stantec Provision of Final Q1-Q4 Environmental May 15, 2020 GM Indicator Data to Stantec Provision of Final Scope 3 Data to Stantec GM May 15, 2020 Teleconference with key GM staff for GM Week of May 18, 2020 Stantec / GM Global Facilities verifications Submittal of Preliminary Verification Week of May 25, 2020 Stantec Statement (Scope 1, 2, water, waste) Submittal of Draft Verification Report and Week of June 1, 2020 Stantec Verification Statement (GM Global Facilities) Submittal of Final Verification Report and Week of June 8, 2020 Stantec Verification Statement (GM Global Facilities)

* This schedule is contingent upon receipt of all required information in a timely manner that is in a format which follows standard methodologies that are verifiable.

VERIFICATION TEAM

Table 4 presents the verification team. As part of Stantec’s Sustainability and Climate Change Standard Operating Procedures (SOP), the competence and selection of the team is completed following ISO 14066. Prior to carrying out any other tasks on the project, Stantec has performed a conflict of interest assessment in accordance with documented procedures that form part of our accreditation to ISO 14065. In addition to assessing for real, potential, or perceived conflicts of interest with GM, Stantec has also assessed against the criteria of CDP and GRI. No real, potential or perceived conflicts of interest were identified.

Table 4 Verification Team

Name Role Responsibilities Gizem will oversee the completion of the procedures and deliverables and will issue the verification statements. She will Gizem Gunal- Lead Verifier also lead the teleconference and undertake all project Akgol, P.Eng. management duties using Stantec’s 10-point project management framework.

Design with community in mind

May 14, 2020 Anna M. Prodin, Manager – GM 2100 CONFIDENTIAL Page 7

Reference: Verification and Sampling Plan - General Motors – Global Facilities 2019 GHG & Sustainability Data

Name Role Responsibilities Nicole will review all deliverables for technical soundness and Nicole Flanagan. Quality compliance with Stantec’s standard operating procedures and M.A.Sc., P.Eng. Reviewer the verification criteria. Dan will review verification documentation to confirm all verification activities have been completed and are sufficient for Daniel Hegg, Independent the required level of assurance. He will independently conclude M.Sc., CEM Peer Reviewer on whether the assertions are materially correct as the independent peer reviewer in accordance with ISO 14064-3 and ISO 14065 Catherine Catherine will primarily execute the verification plans during the MacFarlane, Verifier desktop review as well as prepare the draft and final M.A.Sc. Verification Report. Omid will assist with the execution of the verification plans Omid Tayeba, Verifier during the desktop review and the preparation of the draft and M.Sc. final Verification Report.

Project Manager and Lead Verifier – Gizem Gunal-Akgol, P.Eng.

Gizem is a Senior Atmospheric Engineer and the Technical Area Coordinator for Stantec’s Ontario Climate Risk, Resilience and Sustainability Team, providing support in all areas GHG emissions and sustainability for over 13 years. Her work is primarily in GHGs and climate change related projects including verifications, inventories, and sustainability planning. She has worked closely with municipal and government clients, as well as industrial clients in petroleum refining, chemical and energy production, transportation, waste and manufacturing.

Furthermore, Gizem is an experienced Lead Verifier with a certificate for GHG Verification using ISO 14064-3 since 2009. She has worked on over 130 GHG verification projects for corporations in the areas of stationary and mobile combustion, waste, oil and gas production, power generation, industrial and manufacturing processes under all regulatory programs in Canada as well as for voluntary programs such as CDP. She has been the Lead Verifier for some of Canada’s largest and most complex facilities including refineries and oil sands facilities, as well as for large multi-national corporations.

Gizem has actively been leading the development of community and corporate GHG and Energy Management Plans for municipalities across Canada. She also provides her expertise to clients in sustainability research and reviews, having worked with Environment and Climate Change Canada to complete peer reviews to inform the improvement of Canada’s National Inventory Report.

Gizem combines her regulatory and program knowledge with a technical background in emission generation to provide an in-depth understanding of sources and processes that contribute to emissions.

Quality Reviewer - Nicole Flanagan, M.A.Sc., P.Eng.

Nicole Flanagan, M.A.Sc., P.Eng. has 20 years of environmental engineering experience, twelve of which are with Stantec. Nicole specializes in climate change and air emissions across a variety of industrial, government and corporate sectors. She is currently the Technical Leader for Climate Change and

Design with community in mind

May 14, 2020 Anna M. Prodin, Manager – GM 2100 CONFIDENTIAL Page 8

Reference: Verification and Sampling Plan - General Motors – Global Facilities 2019 GHG & Sustainability Data

Sustainability in Canada. Nicole was the lead verifier of some of the first regulatory GHG offsets sold in North America, has completed Environmental Compliance Approvals (ECAs), Section 71 Reports and National Pollutant Release Inventory reporting for a number of clients facilitating regulatory compliance. Her air emission and verification clients have included major corporations, electric utilities, energy companies, petrochemical production facilities as well as oil & gas companies. As a subject matter expert, Nicole provides training on the carbon accounting of inventories, emission reduction projects and validation/verification on behalf of the Canadian Standards Association. She is also a senior technical reviewer for greenhouse emission quantification, reporting and verification, strategic carbon consulting and sustainability. She also spent four years with Environment Canada working on program development and program delivery, which included meeting with stakeholders and administering procedural processes. In 2011, Nicole was responsible for managing Canada’s UNFCCC National Inventory Report Submission. During this time, she developed a strong understanding of the workings of government from a program administration perspective (Greenhouse Gas, NPRI Reporting Division and Canada’s Offset System) as well as from regulatory and instrument development (development of GHG regulations and Pollution Prevention Planning requirements).

Independent Peer Reviewer – Daniel Hegg, M.Sc., CEM, ENV-SP Verifier

Daniel Hegg is a Senior Carbon Mitigation and Climate Resilience Specialist for Stantec Consulting Ltd. Living on Canada’s west coast has deepened Daniel’s passion for the development and implementation of sustainable practices. His unique perspectives and insights cross many important areas such as sustainable asset management, strategic energy and water management, sustainable ROI business case development, triple bottom line accounting, climate change infrastructure risk assessment for the private and public sectors.

In addition to providing strategy and policy advice, Daniel has specialized expertise in climate change mitigation and adaptation planning. Daniel utilizes a modified risk assessment framework designed to align with ISO 31000 Risk Management Standard and the PIEVC Engineering Protocol to assess various assets and their exposure to climate change risks and hazards, determine priority areas, and develop short/medium/long term strategies to build natural and engineering resilience. Daniel has prepared multiple climate-resilience strategies across a variety of sectors including buildings/real estate, forestry, oil and gas, renewable energy, and mining.

Having worked on dozens of facility energy and GHG inventories across a wide range of industry sectors, Daniel has proven expertise in life cycle analysis (LCA), energy management (ISO5001) and climate change mitigation action planning, reporting and setting GHG emissions reduction targets at the community wide and municipal/ corporate planning contexts. To date Daniel has worked on over 175 GHG emission related inventories and offset projects (ISO14064 and ISO14065). Daniel has also worked with various organizations establish sustainability planning and reporting frameworks using GRI, B Corp, and the AA1000 standards. Much of his work has directly helped guide various private and public sector organizations in sustainability and climate action decision-making.

Verifier – Catherine MacFarlane, M.A.Sc.

Ms. Catherine MacFarlane is an Environmental Scientist at Stantec’s office in Saint John, New Brunswick. She has a Bachelor of Science degree from the University of New Brunswick and a Master of Applied Science degree in Environmental Applied Science and Management from Ryerson University.

Design with community in mind

May 14, 2020 Anna M. Prodin, Manager – GM 2100 CONFIDENTIAL Page 9

Reference: Verification and Sampling Plan - General Motors – Global Facilities 2019 GHG & Sustainability Data

Since joining Stantec, she has been consulting in the atmospheric environment and climate sector. Catherine has experience with ambient air and sound monitoring, and GHG inventory development for range of private and public sector clients. She has worked with organizations and municipalities to develop corporate and community GHG inventories and has assisted in the development of sustainability and GHG management, reduction and mitigation plans. Catherine successfully completed the CSA ISO 14064-3 GHG validation/verification training course in 2012 and worked as a verifier on over 80 GHG verification projects under The Climate Registry and mandatory reporting programs in Alberta, British Colombia, Ontario, Quebec, Newfoundland, Nova Scotia and Massachusetts. These verification projects have included facilities in the following sectors: power generation, cogeneration, manufacturing (chemical, lime and brick), oil and gas (including pipelines, refineries, SAG-D, linear facilities, and others), health care facilities and government bodies.

She also assists with regulatory reporting and environmental impact assessment projects. Her work has supported the planning and permitting of transmission line construction, pipeline construction, commercial developments, wind power developments, bridge construction, and mining developments.

Verifier – Omid Tayeba, M.Sc.

Omid is a Senior Air Quality Specialist with over ten years of environmental consulting experience in Canada and Sweden. Omid is a certified GHG-Inventory Quantifier and obtained his GHG verification certificate in ISO 14064-3 from CSA. He has worked on verification projects in Ontario and Alberta in various sectors including: oil and gas, chemical production and manufacturing. He was involved in Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) projects under the Kyoto GHG Protocol in Sweden, helping clients to prepare the Project Design Document for CDM Registry to obtain Certified Emission Reductions (CERs) credits. Omid has worked on both the consulting and industrial sides of the business. This has given him a rounded perspective to environmental issues faced by industries. Areas of expertise include GHG emissions verification and quantification, industrial air emission inventories, air dispersion and noise modeling, permitting and compliance for air and noise, occupational exposure assessments, indoor air quality assessment, and industrial wastewater treatment.

VERIFICATION PLAN

The initial planned verification procedures are provided in Attachment A.

RISK ASSESSMENT

The verification team assesses the overall verification risk and determines whether the risks are material and have been appropriately disclosed. The verification team will assess risk throughout the verification and adjust our sampling plan as required to meet the assurance requirements of the verification and maintain an acceptable level of risk.

Overall risk assessment is a process conducted by the Stantec verification team based on an assessment of inherent risk, control risk, and detection risk. In this case, the preliminary overall risk has been assessed as medium1, based on our preliminary assessment. The rationale for the assessment of overall risk is provided in the following sections.

1 Possible risk ratings are “high”, “medium” and “low”. These are based on inherent, control and detection risks as evaluated by the project team prior to engaging in verification activities.

Design with community in mind

May 14, 2020 Anna M. Prodin, Manager – GM 2100 CONFIDENTIAL Page 10

Reference: Verification and Sampling Plan - General Motors – Global Facilities 2019 GHG & Sustainability Data

INHERENT RISK

Inherent risk is the risk of error that occurs as a result of the lack of capacity by staff; the size/complexity of the organization; the industrial sector; and/or, the technologies or processes being applied in the organization. We regard this risk as medium due to:

• The 2019 environmental metrics are an aggregation of more than 150 facilities spread across the world. There are multiple facilities within the reporting boundary; however, there are a limited number of activities associated with each facility (medium risk). • Stantec has not yet received the entire 2019 data set for this verification (medium risk). • Most environmental metrics calculations are straightforward, based on activity data, and as applicable, emission factors (low risk). • Most of the activity data used in the assertions is directly invoiced (low risk). • Some raw data may not be available in English (medium risk).

CONTROL RISK

Control risk is the risk that the proponent’s control system will not detect and rectify a discrepancy. When assessing the GM information systems and controls for sources of potential errors, omissions and misrepresentations, the following will be taken into consideration:

• Selection and management of the environmental metric data and information • Processes for collecting, processing, consolidating and reporting environmental metric data and information • Systems and processes that ensure the accuracy of the environmental metric data and information • Design and maintenance of the environmental metric information system • Systems and processes that support the environmental metric information system • Results of previous assessments, if available and appropriate

We currently regard this risk as medium due to:

• GM has been proactive in undergoing previous verifications and received positive verification statements (low risk). • GM uses a data management system to support the collection of GHG emission, energy and water information for the whole organization. The GM2100 systems is subject to financial audits (low risk). • GM uses a data management system to track waste globally. The GMR2 system is not subject to financial audits (medium risk).

DETECTION RISK

Detection risk is the risk that Stantec will not identify a material discrepancy. We regard this risk as low due to:

• Our quality management procedures. We are committed to providing exceptional service in accordance with our ISO 9001 and ISO 14065 accreditations. We believe that quality is a basic principle and that quality management is an integral part of all our work. We take a systematic approach to quality management to comply with requirements and to achieve continual improvement. The cornerstone of our quality management system is an entrenched process of Senior and

Design with community in mind

May 14, 2020 Anna M. Prodin, Manager – GM 2100 CONFIDENTIAL Page 11

Reference: Verification and Sampling Plan - General Motors – Global Facilities 2019 GHG & Sustainability Data

Independent Peer Review which sees that our deliverables have been vetted by experienced and knowledgeable people in our firm. • Level of assurance. This is a limited level of assurance engagement. Stantec takes a risk-based approach to the verification which means that not all information will be reviewed; however, Stantec will design the sampling plan to target potentially material items in the Assertions to keep detection risk low.

SITE VERIFICATION PROCEDURES

Stantec will not conduct any site visits as part of this verification. For verifications conducted to a limited level of assurance, a site visit is not required.

TELECONFERENCE(S)

Since there are no planned site visits, following the desktop review, Stantec will hold a series of teleconferences with GM. The purpose of the calls is to provide an opportunity for Stantec to conduct verification procedures with GM staff that were involved with the collection and compilation of data and quantification of the GHG and sustainability assertions, as well as to review GM’s data collection systems. Stantec will also assess consistency with the program’s requirements and previous year’s methodologies and appropriateness of methods applied. During the teleconferences, the verifiers will pose questions regarding processes and procedures at GM and may request to be sent samples of documentation to support the verification. Gizem Gunal-Akgol (Lead Verifier) will lead the teleconferences on behalf of Stantec.

INFORMATION REQUEST

Attachment B contains a list of documentation and data required by Stantec to complete the verification procedures. This list of data will be updated as needed through the verification process to track the requests and the outcome of the requests.

Design with community in mind

May 14, 2020 Anna M. Prodin, Manager – GM 2100 CONFIDENTIAL Page 12

Reference: Verification and Sampling Plan - General Motors – Global Facilities 2019 GHG & Sustainability Data

FINALIZING THE VERIFICATION PLAN

The initial verification procedures may be adjusted to reflect changes to the risk identified during the verification and any additional verification procedures deemed necessary to provide a limited level of assurance. The final Verification Report will capture any changes to risk, the verification procedures, or the assertions since the issuance of the initial Verification and Sampling Plan.

Should you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me directly.

Regards,

STANTEC CONSULTING LTD. This letter was reviewed and approved for transmittal by:

Gizem Gunal-Akgol, P.Eng. Daniel Hegg, M.Sc., CEM. Lead Verifier and Project Manager Independent Peer Reviewer 100-300 Hagey Boulevard Waterloo, ON N2L 0A4 400-655 Tyee Road Victoria, ON V9A 6X5 Tel: (519) 569-8126 Fax: (519) 579-6733 Tel: (250) 389-2538 Fax: (250) 382-0514 [email protected] [email protected]

Attachment: Attachment A Verification Procedure Attachment B Data Request Table gg \\cd1002-f11\ghg\general_motors_global_160900942_2019\2_val_ver_plan\val_or_ver_plan\dft_vplan_gmglobal_20200514.docx

Design with community in mind

May 14, 2020 Anna M. Prodin, Manager – GM 2100 CONFIDENTIAL

Attachment A Verification Procedure

Design with community in mind

Attachment A: Initial Planned Verification Procedures

Line Item Inherent Risk Control Risk Detection Risk Attribute Type of Verification Procedure Description of Procedure and Sampling Overall Reported Assertion Medium – this is not the first year Low – this is not the first year of Low - Stantec will perform Completeness Test of detail – inspection, inquiry • Inspect GHG Inventory Management Plan of reporting. However, the GHG, reporting; GM has undergone sufficient verification procedures (or other available documentation) for water, waste and energy previous verification of GHG to provide a limited level of compliance with program criteria. assertion for 2019 consists of emissions and reporting to assurance statement. • Assess environmental information system over 150 facilities spread across CDP. Two data management and its controls for potential sources of error, the world, with various emission systems support the activity omissions and misrepresentations sources and technologies. Some data used within the line items • Assess the reporting boundary for facilities are excluded from below. completeness, transparency and compliance certain metric/reporting program with reporting program/criteria. boundaries. Accuracy Test of detail – inspection, inquiry • Inspect that all recorded totals are

accurately and transparently reported Consistency Test of detail – inspection, inquiry • Assess for changes in the reporting boundary from previous reporting periods Scope 1 - Stationary Medium – well known technology Low –GM has a data Low - Stantec can trace natural Completeness Test of detail – inspection, • Inquire on data aggregation and quality Combustion – Natural Gas and operation is not complicated. management system for the gas data and perform trend reconciliation assurance and control procedures. collection of activity data that is analysis to detect anomalies. Invoices are from third party Accuracy Test of detail – inquiry, inspection, • subject to financial audits. Review invoices (consumption data) for providers. Stantec can perform verification tracing, recalculation three months of the year for the top highest procedures to confirm Some supporting documents are Test of control - analytical test – natural gas consuming facilities (the facilities consistency of methodologies. not in English. correlation, profile which, in combination, represent 50% of emissions from natural gas consumption). • Recalculate all annual natural gas emissions. • Review emission factors for appropriateness. Cut-off Test of detail – inspection • For the samples examined, confirm dates of data are accurate, complete, and only 2019 data has been incorporated into the emissions calculations. Consistency Test of detail – inquiry, inspection • Assess whether quantification and aggregation methodologies are consistent with previous periods. Scope 1 - Stationary Low – well known technology Low –GM has a data Low – Stantec can trace data Completeness Test of detail – inspection, • Inquire on data aggregation and quality Combustion – Coke, Fuel and operation is not complicated management system for the and perform trend analysis to reconciliation assurance and control procedures. Oil, Diesel, Propane, (metered consumption or collection of activity data that is detect anomalies. Accuracy Test of detail – inquiry, inspection, • Limestone (process) invoices). subject to financial audits. Recalculate coke combustion emissions for Stantec can perform verification tracing, recalculation all facilities with coke consumption reported. Invoices are from third party procedures to confirm Test of control - analytical test – • Check that emissions from sources that are providers. consistency of methodologies. correlation, profile less than 0.5% of the total Scope 1 emissions are reasonable (oil, diesel, propane, limestone and landfill gas). • Review emission factors for appropriateness. Cut-off Test of detail – inspection • For the samples selected, confirm dates of data are accurate, complete, and only 2019 data has been incorporated into the emissions calculations. Attachment A: Initial Planned Verification Procedures

Line Item Inherent Risk Control Risk Detection Risk Attribute Type of Verification Procedure Description of Procedure and Sampling Consistency Test of detail – inquiry, inspection • Assess whether quantification and aggregation methodologies are consistent with previous periods. Scope 1 - Use of Medium – calculations are based Medium – data management Low – Stantec can trace data Completeness Test of detail – inspection, • Inquire on data aggregation and quality Refrigerant, GMNA only on storage quantities, robustness systems for this item are and perform trend analysis to reconciliation assurance and control procedures. (hydrofluorocarbons and of data collection system is unknown. detect anomalies. Accuracy Test of detail – inquiry, inspection, • perfluorocarbons) unknown. Review quantities used against storage Stantec can perform verification tracing, recalculation documentation for three months of the year procedures to confirm Test of control - analytical test – for the top highest emitting facilities (the consistency of methodologies. correlation, profile facilities which, in combination, represent 50% of emissions of refrigerant). • Recalculate all refrigerant emissions. • Review emission factors for appropriateness. Cut-off Test of detail – inspection • For the samples examined, confirm dates of data are accurate, complete, and only 2019 data has been incorporated into the emissions calculations. Consistency Test of detail – inquiry, inspection • Assess whether quantification and aggregation methodologies are consistent with previous periods. Scope 1 - Mobile GHG High – well known technology Medium – data management Low – Stantec can trace data Completeness Test of detail – inspection, • Inquire on data aggregation and quality Emissions, GMNA only and operation is not complicated. systems for this item are and perform trend analysis to reconciliation assurance and control procedures. (Gasoline, Diesel, LPG) It is unknown what the volumes unknown. detect anomalies. Accuracy Test of detail – inquiry, inspection, • of fuel are based on and Review quantities used against invoices or Stantec can perform verification tracing, recalculation other source data for three months of the robustness of data collection procedures to confirm Test of control - analytical test – year for the top highest emitting facilities (the system is also unknown. consistency of methodologies. correlation, profile facilities which, in combination, represent 50% of mobile emissions). • Recalculate all mobile emissions. • Review emission factors for appropriateness. Cut-off Test of detail – inspection • For the samples examined, confirm dates of data are accurate, complete, and only 2019 data has been incorporated into the emissions calculations. Consistency Test of detail – inquiry, inspection • Assess whether quantification and aggregation methodologies are consistent with previous periods. Scope 2 - Electricity Use Medium - well known technology Low –GM has a system for the Low - Stantec can trace Completeness Test of detail – inspection, • Inquire on data aggregation and quality and operation is not complicated. collection of consumption electricity data and perform trend reconciliation assurance and control procedures. information. analysis to detect anomalies. Invoices are from third party Accuracy Test of detail – inquiry, inspection, • Review electricity invoices for three months providers. Stantec can perform verification tracing, recalculation of the year for the top highest electricity procedures to confirm Some supporting documents are Test of control - analytical test – consuming facilities (the facilities which, in consistency of methodologies. not in English. correlation, profile combination, represent 50% of emissions from electricity consumption). • Recalculate all annual electricity emissions. Attachment A: Initial Planned Verification Procedures

Line Item Inherent Risk Control Risk Detection Risk Attribute Type of Verification Procedure Description of Procedure and Sampling • Review emission factors for appropriateness. Cut-off Test of detail – inspection • For the samples selected, confirm dates of data are accurate, complete, and only 2019 data has been incorporated into the emissions calculations. Consistency Test of detail – inquiry, inspection • Assess whether quantification and aggregation methodologies are consistent with previous periods. Scope 2 - Purchased Steam Low – well known technology Low –total emissions from Low – Stantec can trace data Completeness Test of detail – inspection, • Inquire on data aggregation and quality and Delivered Heat and operation is not complicated these sources are low. and perform trend analysis to reconciliation assurance and control procedures. (metered consumption or detect anomalies. Accuracy Test of detail – inquiry, inspection, • invoices). Check that emissions from sources that are Stantec can perform verification tracing, recalculation less than 0.5% of the total Scope 2 procedures to confirm Test of control - analytical test – emissions are reasonable (purchased steam consistency of methodologies. correlation, profile and delivered heat). Cut-off Test of detail – inspection • For the sample selected, confirm dates of data are accurate, complete, and only 2019 data has been incorporated into the emissions calculations. Consistency Test of detail – inquiry, inspection • Assess whether quantification and aggregation methodologies are consistent with previous periods. Scope 3 – Fuel and Energy Medium –fuel and energy related Low –GM has a system for data Low - Stantec can trace Completeness Test of detail – inspection, • Inquire on data aggregation and quality Related Activities (Category Scope 3 emissions are collection. assumptions and vouch source reconciliation assurance and control procedures. 3) calculated based on Scope 1 & data. Accuracy Test of detail – inquiry, inspection, • Scope 2 totals which had low to Recalculate annual emissions from fuel and Stantec can re-perform tracing, recalculation energy related activities, based on total high risks identified. quantification and confirm Scope 1 & 2 quantities reviewed. consistency of methodologies. • Test of control - analytical test – Review emission factors for correlation, profile appropriateness. Cut-off Test of detail – inspection • Confirm dates of data are accurate, complete, and only 2019 data has been incorporated into the emissions calculations. Consistency Test of detail – inquiry, inspection • Assess whether quantification and aggregation methodologies are consistent with previous periods. Scope 3 – Upstream Medium – calculations currently Low –GM has a system for data Low - Stantec can trace Completeness Test of detail – inspection, • Inquire on data aggregation and quality Transportation (Category 4) unknown collection. assumptions and vouch source reconciliation assurance and control procedures. data. Accuracy Test of detail – inquiry, inspection, • Recalculate annual emissions from Stantec can re-perform tracing, recalculation upstream transportation quantification and confirm • Review emission factors for appropriateness consistency of methodologies. Test of control - analytical test – (if applicable). correlation, profile Attachment A: Initial Planned Verification Procedures

Line Item Inherent Risk Control Risk Detection Risk Attribute Type of Verification Procedure Description of Procedure and Sampling Cut-off Test of detail – inspection • Confirm dates of data are accurate, complete, and only 2019 data has been incorporated into the emissions calculations. Consistency Test of detail – inquiry, inspection • Assess whether quantification and aggregation methodologies are consistent with previous periods. Scope 3 – Business Travel Low – simple calculation based Low – mileage information Low – Stantec can trace Completeness Test of detail – inspection, • Inquire on data aggregation and quality (Air Travel Only) (Category on mileage. provided by third party based assumptions and vouch source reconciliation assurance and control procedures. 6) on financial accounting. data. Accuracy Test of detail – inquiry, inspection, • Recalculate annual emissions from air Stantec can re-perform tracing, recalculation travel. quantification and confirm • Review emission factors for consistency of methodologies. Test of control - analytical test – appropriateness. correlation, profile Cut-off Test of detail – inspection • Confirm dates of data are accurate, complete, and only 2019 data has been incorporated into the emissions calculations. Consistency Test of detail – inquiry, inspection • Assess whether quantification and aggregation methodologies are consistent with previous periods. Scope 3 – Downstream Medium – calculations currently Low –GM has a system for data Low - Stantec can trace Completeness Test of detail – inspection, • Inquire on data aggregation and quality Transportation (Category 9) unknown collection. assumptions and vouch source reconciliation assurance and control procedures. data. Accuracy Test of detail – inquiry, inspection, • Recalculate annual emissions from Stantec can re-perform tracing, recalculation downstream transportation quantification and confirm • Review emission factors for appropriateness consistency of methodologies. Test of control - analytical test – (if applicable). correlation, profile Cut-off Test of detail – inspection • Confirm dates of data are accurate, complete, and only 2019 data has been incorporated into the emissions calculations. Consistency Test of detail – inquiry, inspection • Assess whether quantification and aggregation methodologies are consistent with previous periods. Scope 3 – Use of Sold Medium – Emissions are based Low –GM has a system for data Low - Stantec can trace Completeness Test of detail – inspection, • Inquire on data aggregation and quality Products (Mobile on a number of assumptions collection. assumptions and vouch source reconciliation assurance and control procedures. Combustion Emissions) (average vehicle lifetime, data. Accuracy Test of detail – inquiry, inspection, • (Category 11) average annual kilometres Recalculate annual emissions for all Stantec can re-perform tracing, recalculation facilities. driven). quantification and confirm • Vouch select emission factors and source of Quantification is relatively consistency of methodologies. various assumptions relating to lifetime straightforward. Test of control - analytical test – correlation, profile kilometres driven. Cut-off Test of detail – inspection • Confirm dates of data are accurate, complete, and only 2019 data has been incorporated into the emissions calculations. Attachment A: Initial Planned Verification Procedures

Line Item Inherent Risk Control Risk Detection Risk Attribute Type of Verification Procedure Description of Procedure and Sampling Consistency Test of detail – inquiry, inspection • Assess whether quantification and aggregation methodologies are consistent with previous periods. Scope 3 – Purchase and Medium – GM uses an Low –GM has a system for data Low - Stantec can trace data and Completeness Test of detail – inspection, • Inquire on data aggregation and quality Use of Goods and Services appropriate and transparent third collection. perform trend analysis to detect reconciliation assurance and control procedures. (Category 1) / Capital party model for these anomalies. Accuracy Test of detail – inquiry, inspection, • Goods (Category 2) calculations. Recalculate a sample of emissions and Stantec can perform verification tracing, recalculation reaggregate annual emissions from the procedures to confirm purchase and use of goods and consistency of methodologies. services/capital. Test of control - analytical test – • correlation, profile Review source of emission factors and third- party model. Cut-off Test of detail – inspection • Confirm dates of data are accurate, complete, and only 2019 data has been incorporated into the emissions calculations. Consistency Test of detail – inquiry, inspection • Assess whether quantification and aggregation methodologies are consistent with previous periods. Energy Use (MWh) Low – simple aggregation of Low – Control Risk is assessed Low - Aggregation can be easily Completeness n/a • n/a – rely on above Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions above. conducted. Accuracy Test of detail – recalculation • as identified above. Recalculate energy use. Cut-off n/a • n/a – rely on above Consistency n/a • n/a – rely on above Renewable Energy Use Medium – basis of data and Medium – data management Low - Stantec can trace Completeness Test of detail – inspection, • Inquire on data aggregation and quality including: calculations are unknown. systems for this item are assumptions and vouch source reconciliation assurance and control procedures. unknown. data. Renewable Energy Accuracy Test of detail – inquiry, inspection, • Review source data for three months of the Certificate (REC) credits Stantec can re-perform tracing, recalculation year for appropriate sample of credits (tCO2e); GHG reductions quantification and confirm Test of control - analytical test – obtained. applied (tCO2e); Renewable consistency of methodologies. correlation, profile • Recalculate reductions applied and % of electricity use (%) total electricity use. • Review reduction factors for appropriateness. Cut-off Test of detail – inspection • For the samples selected, confirm dates of data are accurate, complete, and only 2019 data has been incorporated into the emissions calculations. Consistency Test of detail – inquiry, inspection • Assess whether quantification and aggregation methodologies are consistent with previous periods. Year Over Year Low – one calculation for inputs Low – GM has a sufficient Low – two parameters and one Accuracy Test of detail – recalculation • Recalculate year over year metric Performance- Global that are verified above. system in place, compounded calculation are easy to reproduce Energy by low complexity. by Stantec. Year Over Year Low – one calculation for inputs Low – GM has a sufficient Low – two parameters and one Accuracy Test of detail – recalculation • Recalculate year over year metric Performance - Water that are verified above. system in place, compounded calculation are easy to reproduce by low complexity. by Stantec. Attachment A: Initial Planned Verification Procedures

Line Item Inherent Risk Control Risk Detection Risk Attribute Type of Verification Procedure Description of Procedure and Sampling Year Over Year Low – one calculation for inputs Low – GM has a sufficient Low – two parameters and one Accuracy Test of detail – recalculation • Recalculate year over year metric Performance - GHG that are verified above. system in place, compounded calculation are easy to reproduce Emissions by low complexity. by Stantec. Water Use Medium – relatively simple Low –GM has a system for data Low - Stantec can trace water Accuracy Test of detail –recalculation • Review water invoices for three months of parameters, however there are collection. data and perform trend analysis the year for the top highest water consuming numerous facilities spread across to detect anomalies. facilities (the facilities which, in combination, the world with various sources. Stantec can perform verification represent 50% of water consumption). procedures to confirm • Recalculate annual water use consistency of methodologies. Consistency Test of detail - inspection • Consistent facilities and consumption metrics Completeness Test of detail - inspection • Assess completeness of inventory Cut-off Test of detail - inspection • Confirm dates of data are accurate, complete, and only 2019 data has been incorporated. Transparency Test of detail - inspection • Is reporting sufficiently transparent Waste Medium – relatively simple Low –GM has a system for data Low - Stantec can trace waste Accuracy Test of detail –recalculation • Review waste data for one month of the year parameters, however there are collection. data and perform trend analysis for the top highest waste producing facilities numerous facilities spread across to detect anomalies. (the facilities which, in combination, the world with various sources. Stantec can perform verification represent 50% of waste production). procedures to confirm • Recalculate annual waste consistency of methodologies. Consistency Test of detail - inspection • Consistent facilities and waste metrics Completeness Test of detail - inspection • Assess completeness of inventory Cut-off Test of detail - inspection • Confirm dates of data are accurate, complete, and only 2019 data has been incorporated. Transparency Test of detail - inspection • Assess that reporting sufficiently transparent Global Production Medium – relatively simple Low – GM reports total Low – Stantec can trace total Accuracy Test of detail –recalculation • Conduct a trend analysis for production year parameters, however there are production to various entities as production to various financial over year to determine potential anomalies. numerous facilities spread across it is their main product reports • Trace production records to data reported to the world with various sources. regulators (or other reporting entity) Consistency Test of detail - inspection • Consistent facilities and metrics Completeness Test of detail - inspection • Reaggregate total production Cut off Test of detail - inspection • Confirm dates of data are accurate, complete, and only 2019 data has been incorporated. Transparency Test of detail - inspection • Assess that reporting sufficiently transparent Number of landfill-free Low – relatively simple Low –GM has a system for data Low - Stantec can trace Completeness Test of detail - inspection • Inquire on data aggregation and quality facilities (total, %) parameters collection. assumptions and vouch source assurance and control procedures. data. Accuracy Test of detail – inquiry, inspection, • Review methodology used to determine if a Stantec can re-perform tracing facility is landfill free quantification and confirm • Sample certificates associated with landfill consistency of methodologies. free facilities Attachment A: Initial Planned Verification Procedures

Line Item Inherent Risk Control Risk Detection Risk Attribute Type of Verification Procedure Description of Procedure and Sampling Transparency Test of detail - inspection • Assess that reporting sufficiently transparent GRI 302 – Energy Low – simple aggregation of Low – Control Risk is assessed Low - Aggregation can be easily Accuracy Test of detail –recalculation • Rely on energy verification above Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions above. conducted. Consistency Test of detail - inspection • as identified above. Consistent facilities and consumption metrics Completeness Test of detail - inspection • Assess completeness of inventory Cut-off Test of detail - inspection • Inspect that energy values are for 2019 Transparency Test of detail - inspection • Assess that reporting sufficiently transparent GRI 303 - Water Medium – relatively simple Low –GM has a system for data Low - Stantec can trace water Accuracy Test of detail –recalculation • Rely on water verification above parameters, however there are collection. data and perform trend analysis Consistency Test of detail - inspection • numerous facilities spread across to detect anomalies. Consistent facilities and consumption metrics the world with various sources. Stantec can perform verification procedures to confirm Completeness Test of detail - inspection • Assess completeness of inventory consistency of methodologies. Cut-off Test of detail - inspection • Inspect that waste values are for 2019 Transparency Test of detail - inspection • Assess that reporting sufficiently transparent GRI 305 Emissions Low – activity data assessed Low –GM has a data Low - Stantec can trace data and Accuracy Test of detail –recalculation • Rely on Scope 1 & 2 verification above above and well-established management system for the perform trend analysis to detect Consistency Test of detail - inspection • emission factors. collection of activity data that is anomalies. Consistent facilities and consumption metrics subject to financial audits. Stantec can perform verification procedures to confirm Completeness Test of detail - inspection • Assess completeness of inventory consistency of methodologies. Cut-off Test of detail - inspection • Inspect that emissions values are for 2019 Transparency Test of detail - inspection • Assess that reporting sufficiently transparent

GRI 305 – 7 Total Nitrogen Low – relatively simple Low –GM has a data Low - Stantec can trace data and Completeness Test of detail - inspection • Inquire on data aggregation and quality Oxides (NOx), Sulfur Oxides parameters, activity data management system for the perform trend analysis to detect assurance and control procedures. (SOx), and other significant assessed above. collection of activity data that is anomalies. Accuracy Test of detail –recalculation • air emissions subject to financial audits. Recalculate a sample of emissions and Stantec can perform verification reaggregate annual emissions procedures to confirm • Vouch select emission factors consistency of methodologies. Cut-off Test of detail - inspection • Confirm dates are accurate, complete, and only 2019 data has been incorporated into the emissions calculations Transparency Test of detail - inspection • Assess that reporting sufficiently transparent GRI 306 Effluents and Medium – relatively simple Low –GM has a system for data Low - Stantec can trace waste Accuracy Test of detail –recalculation • Rely on waste verification above Waste parameters, however there are collection. data and perform trend analysis Consistency Test of detail - inspection • numerous facilities spread across to detect anomalies. Consistent facilities and consumption metrics the world with various sources. Stantec can perform verification procedures to confirm Completeness Test of detail - inspection • Assess completeness of inventory consistency of methodologies. Cut-off Test of detail - inspection • Inspect that waste values are for 2019 Transparency Test of detail - inspection • Assess that reporting sufficiently transparent

May 14, 2020 Anna M. Prodin, Manager – GM 2100 CONFIDENTIAL

Attachment B Data Request Table

Design with community in mind

Item N° Information Requested Environmental metrics management plan, GHG inventory management plan, or a similar document that summarizes the calculations, methodologies, sources of emission factors and other calculation G1 inputs, data management, quality management systems, etc.

G2 Complete list of GM Global facilities in 2019, including any facilities that were not included in environmental reporting (GHG/energy, water and waste).

G3 Description of changes to quantification methodologies and reporting boundaries between 2019 and 2018 and since the baseline (if any).

G4 Description of mergers, acquisitions, or divestitures which occurred in 2019.

G5 Description of changes to geographical and/or organizational boundaries between 2019 and 2018 and since the baseline (if any).

G6 Description of GM's organizational boundaries for 2019 reporting - e.g. financial control, operational control etc.

G7 Description of the GM2100 and GMR2 systems including how data is collected and incorporated into the systems, what quality assurance quality controls are used, etc. How has GM dealt with leased properties for reporting in 2019? Does GM have a policy with regard to how environmental metrics from leased properties are included or excluded from the reporting G8 boundary?

G9 Summary of annual metrics

G10 Complete list of 2019 assertions on all GHGs and environmental parameters. [FINAL]

G11 Facility invoice key spreadsheets for all facilities where an invoice/metered data is requested (see items below)

G12 Global warming potential values applied for 2019

S1A Draft 2019 GHG/energy calculation spreadsheets for GM Global Facilities, including a complete facility list and summary/breakdown by scope and by facility.

S1E Final 2019 GHG/energy calculation spreadsheets for GM Global Facilities, including a complete facility list and summary/breakdown by scope and by facility.

S2 2019 Spreadsheet detailing emission factors used for GHG emissions.

S3 Emission factors (and source of emission factors) associated with purchased steam and delivered heat.

S4 Source of HHVs for Scope 1 Emissions

S5 Calculations, emission factors and total electricity emissions for market-based electricity assertion.

S6 As part of your data management system, do you archive sources for calculation inputs such as emission factors? Provide links to or actual documents which contain the emission factors used.

S7 2019 monthly natural gas invoices or metered data for select facilities

S11 2019 monthly electricity invoices or metered data for select facilities

S15 Total emissions of and data supporting quantity of Refrigerants used for reporting in Scope 1

S16 Total emissions of and data supporting fuel quantity in calculation of on-site transportation emissions for Scope 1 reporting

S17 International Energy Agency (IEA), World CO2 Emissions From Fuel Combustion Database

T1 2019 Scope 3 - Cat 1 & 2 Purchased Goods and Services and Capital Goods calculation spreadsheets, model results and supporting information for GM Global Facilities.

T2 2019 Scope 3 - Cat 3 Fuel & Energy calculation spreadsheets and supporting information for GM Global Facilities.

T3 2019 Scope 3 - Cat 11 Use of Sold Product calculation spreadsheets and supporting information for GM Global Facilities.

T4 2019 Scope 3 - Cat 6 Employee Travel calculation spreadsheets and supporting information (air travel) Item N° Information Requested T6 2019 Scope 3- Cat 4 spreadsheets and supporting information (upstream transportation)

T7 2019 Scope 3- Cat 9 spreadsheets and supporting information (downstream transportation)

T8 2019 Scope 3 HFC and PFC data

A1A 2019 water calculation spreadsheets for GM Global Facilities, including a complete facility list and summary/breakdown of water use by facility - Draft.

A1E 2019 water calculation spreadsheets for GM Global Facilities, including a complete facility list and summary/breakdown of water use by facility - Final.

A2 Water data to support water consumption totals for select facilities

W1 2019 waste calculation spreadsheets for GM Global Facilities, including a complete facility list and summary/breakdown of waste by facility.

W2 Waste reports to support waste totals for select facilities

W3 Supporting documentation for the numbers in the waste reports for one month per facility.

W4 Monthly waste reports for select facilities. Two months requested: May and September, 2019.

W5 Template and instructions for entering data into GMR2

W6 Monthly waste tracking data 2019

O1 2019 global production data (vehicles produced and reported)

O2 Renewable Energy Assertion calculation spreadsheets.

O3 Renewable Energy Assertion supporting data including REC certificates.

O4 Renewable Energy Assertion supporting information for sample of certificates including the following (list to be provided upon receipt of initial data).

O5 Provide facility emissions data in support of Nox, Sox, and other significant air emissions.

O6 Provide EFs used in calculating Nox, Sox, and other significant air emissions.

O7 Landfill free facilities Assertion i.e. number and % of facilities

O8 List of landfill free facilities

O9 Explanation of methodology used to determine if facility is landfill free

O10 Sample of certificates associated with landfill free facilities (sample to be determined upon receipt of list)

VERIFICATION REPORT – 2019 GREENHOUSE GAS AND SUSTAINABILITY DATA ASSERTIONSGENERAL MOTORS COMPANY – GLOBAL FACILITIES

Appendix C Verification Statement July 10, 2020

Appendix C VERIFICATION STATEMENT

2019 VERIFICATION STATEMENT – GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY

Statement of Verification Introduction Stantec Consulting Ltd. (Stantec) was contracted by General Motors Company (GM) to conduct an independent third-party verification of a selection of greenhouse gas (GHG) and sustainability data assertions (the assertions) for their Global Facilities.

In this work, GM was responsible for the collection of activity data used in the calculations, data management, and completion of the calculations.

Stantec was responsible for planning and executing the verification to deliver an opinion to a limited level of assurance as to whether the GHG and sustainability data assertions are presented fairly and in accordance with the verification criteria. Stantec is accredited with the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), a member of the International Accreditation Forum (IAF), in accordance with ISO 14065 (Accreditation ID #0805 issued to Stantec Consulting Ltd. for greenhouse gas (GHG) verification and validation).

Intended User The results of the verification will be used by GM for internal and external sustainability reporting, and for reporting to CDP. The users of this statement are GM, shareholders and the public.

Verification Objective The objective of the verification was to assess whether the GHG and sustainability data assertions (as presented in Table 1) for GM’s 2019 operations are accurately prepared in accordance with appropriate criteria.

Verification Boundaries The boundaries of the verification include GM owned and operated facilities within General Motors North America (GMNA), General Motors South America (GMSA) and General Motors International Operations (GMIO). A subset of these facilities have been excluded from the GHG and sustainability data assertions due to unavailability of data, and a list of these excluded facilities has been provided to Stantec and included in the detailed verification report for transparency.

Reporting Period The verification was conducted for the period of January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019.

GHG and Sustainability Data Assertions The GHG and sustainability data assertions are provided in Table 1.

1

2019 VERIFICATION STATEMENT – GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY

Table 1. General Motors Global Facilities - 2019 GHG and Sustainability Data Assertions

Parameter Assertion Units Notes Metric tonnes of carbon dioxide Scope 1 GHG Emissions - Total 1,589,700 - equivalent (tCO2e)

Scope 2 GHG Emissions (Location - 4,381,970 tCO2e Based)

Scope 2 GHG Emissions (Market - 3,721,875 tCO2e Based)

Scope 3 GHG Emissions Fuel & Energy 322,403 tCO2e - not in Scope 1 & 2 (Category 3)

Scope 3 GHG Emissions Business 40,051 tCO2e Air travel only Travel, Air (Category 6)

Includes emissions Scope 3 GHG Emissions Use of Sold from vehicle travel 190,123,729 tCO2e Product (Category 11) and air conditioning systems

Total Energy Use 15,650,685 MWh -

Total Water Use 31,254,916 m3 -

Does not include waste from Total Waste 1,770,387 metric tonnes construction, demolition and remediation

Waste per Vehicle Produced 222 kg per vehicle -

Total renewable electricity 1,636,792 MWh -

Total electricity use 7,478,378 MWh -

Renewable electricity as a percentage 21.9% % - of total electricity use

Total GHG reductions applied due to 660,094 tCO2e - renewable electricity use

Number of landfill-free facilities 94 # Facilities -

Year Over Year Performance Location-Based Scope 1 & 2 GHG emissions -5.4 % (Scopes 1 & 2) (negative value represents decrease)

2

2019 VERIFICATION STATEMENT – GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY

Parameter Assertion Units Notes

Year Over Year Performance Total Energy Use -9.9 % Scopes 1 & 2 (negative value represents decrease)

Year Over Year Performance M-Schedule Total Water Use -14.5 % (saleable vehicles) (negative value represents decrease)

Year Over Year Performance Vehicles Produced -15.4 % - (negative value represents decrease)

Year Over Year Performance Waste per Vehicle -0.9 % - (negative value represents decrease)

GRI 302-1 Total Energy Use 15,650,685 MWh -

GRI 303-1 Total Water Use 31,254,916 m3 -

GRI 305-1 Total Scope 1 GHG 1,589,700 tCO2e - Emissions

GRI 305-2 Total Scope 2 GHG 4,381,970 tCO2e Location-Based Emissions

Category 6 is air travel only. Category 3: 322,403 Category 11 GRI 305-3 Total Scope 3 GHG Category 6: 40,051 tCO2e includes emissions Emissions Category 11: from vehicle travel 190,123,729 and air conditioning systems

Does not include GRI 305-7 NOx, SOx and other SOx (as SO2): 0.03 thousand metric combustion of significant air emissions NOx: 11.5 tonnes mobile fuels

Does not include GRI 306-2 Total Waste waste from (excluding construction, demolition and 1,770,387 metric tonnes construction, remediation) demolition and remediation

M-Schedule Production 7,332,373 # Vehicles (saleable vehicles)

3

2019 VERIFICATION STATEMENT – GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY

Verification Criteria Stantec has conducted sufficient and appropriate procedures to express a limited level of assurance opinion as to whether the GHG and sustainability data assertions for 2019 as quantified by GM satisfy the requirements of the following criteria:

• ISO 14064 Greenhouses Gases – Part 1: Specification with guidance at the organization level for quantification and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions and removals, 2006;

• World Resources Institute (WRI)/World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (Revised Edition), March 2004;

• WRI/WBCSD, Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and Reporting Standard;

• WRI/WBCSD, GHG Protocol Scope 2 Guidance: An Amendment to the GHG Corporate Standard;

• CDP Guidance for the 2019 reporting year (CDP Guidance); and

• GRI Sustainability Reporting Guidelines (2011).

Verification Standards The verification is being conducted in accordance with ISO14064:3, the AA1000 AccountAbility Principles Standard (2008) and Stantec’s Standard Operating Procedures developed for accreditation to ISO 14065.

Verification Opinion Based on the processes and procedures completed, there is no evidence that GM’s stated GHG and sustainability data assertions for the 2019 calendar year are not, in all material respects, fairly stated in accordance with the criteria noted herein.

4

2019 VERIFICATION STATEMENT – GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY

Verifier’s Independence, Impartiality, and Competence Stantec provides this conclusion as an independent verifier. Prior to entering into an assurance agreement Stantec assesses for any real, potential, or perceived conflict. Stantec continues to monitor for compromised impartiality throughout the engagement. No real, potential or perceived conflicts of interest were identified throughout the course of this verification.

Stantec provides this report to GM in accordance with our terms of agreement. We consent to its public release. Because of the inherent limitations in any verification, Stantec accepts no responsibility by use of a third party. Stantec has undertaken all assignments in its role as an environmental engineering consulting firm using professional effort consistent with ISO 14064:3. Stantec has assessed the 2019 GHG and sustainability data assertions for GM Global Facilities using reasonably ascertainable information. The assessment represents the conditions in the subject area at the time of the assessment. Stantec did not conduct direct GHG emissions monitoring or other environmental sampling and analysis in conjunction with this verification statement.

STANTEC CONSULTING LTD.

Gizem Gunal-Akgol, P.Eng Daniel Hegg, M.Sc., CEM Lead Verifier Independent Peer Reviewer Environmental Services Environmental Services Tel: (519) 569-8126 Tel: (250) 389-2538

Issued July 10, 2020 in Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

5