SMSC Evidence
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2021 Secondary Co-Ordinated Admissions Scheme
2021 SECONDARY CO-ORDINATED ADMISSIONS SCHEME This Scheme is formulated in accordance with the School Admissions Code which came into force on 19th December 2014. Trafford LA has formulated this Scheme in relation to each school in the Trafford area. The Governing Bodies/Trusts of the following schools/academies are the admission authorities for the secondary schools to which this scheme applies: Altrincham College; Altrincham Grammar School for Boys; Altrincham Grammar School for Girls; Ashton-on-Mersey School; Blessed Thomas Holford Catholic College; Broadoak School; Flixton Girls’ School; Loreto Grammar School; North Cestrian School; Sale High School; Sale Grammar School; Stretford Grammar School; Stretford High School; St Ambrose College; St Antony's Catholic College; Urmston Grammar School; Wellacre Academy and Wellington School. Trafford LA is the admission authority for Lostock High School. NORMAL ADMISSION ROUND (transfer from primary to secondary school) SEPTEMBER 2021 1. APPLICATION PROCEDURE i) In the autumn term of the offer year all parents of Year 6 children will be invited to submit an application. Information on how to apply will be sent to all parents of pupils resident in Trafford, at their home address. ii) An advertisement will be placed in the local press inviting parents who are resident in Trafford whose children may not currently be attending a Trafford primary school to submit an application. iii) Information will be sent to all parents by 12 September in the offer year and they will be asked to submit their application by 31 October, thereby ensuring that all parents have the statutory 6 week period in which to express their preferences. -
Stretford High School Great Stone Road, Stretford, Manchester, Lancashire, M32 0XA
School report Stretford High School Great Stone Road, Stretford, Manchester, Lancashire, M32 0XA Inspection dates 8–9 May 2013 Previous inspection: Outstanding 1 Overall effectiveness This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2 Summary of key findings for parents and pupils This is a good school. After the previous inspection in 2008, Teaching is usually good with some that is achievement dipped significantly. It has outstanding. Most teachers have good subject recovered strongly in recent years and knowledge and use questioning well to make students now achieve well. students think deeply about what they are Attainment has improved in recent years and learning. is now average and rising. Students behave well in lessons and around The majority of students make the progress the school. They are polite and friendly to each expected of them. The proportion doing other and to the adults working with them. better than this has grown over the last three Most students have positive attitudes to years and now compares favourably to learning. national figures. Students feel very safe in school. Students who are known to be eligible for the Leaders and managers, including the governing pupil premium and students who are disabled body, have a clear view of the school’s or with special educational needs also make strengths and where it could do better. They good progress and achieve well because of drive the school purposefully forward. the highly effective care, guidance and support that the school provides for them. -
Excellence in English What We Can Learn from 12 Outstanding Schools
Excellence in English What we can learn from 12 outstanding schools One of the most pressing issues in English facing a large number of schools today is how to improve from being good to outstanding. The aim of this report is to improve practice in English across all schools and particularly to help them become outstanding. The report provides 12 case studies of schools which are successful in helping their pupils to make outstanding progress in English. Published: May 2011 Reference no: 100229 The Office for Standards in Education, Children's Services and Skills (Ofsted) regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email [email protected]. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected]. -
(2002-2014) on Pupil Sorting and Social Segregation: a Greater Manchester Case Study
WP24 The Effects of English School System Reforms (2002-2014) on Pupil Sorting and Social Segregation: A Greater Manchester Case Study Working Paper 24 August 2017 The Effects of English School System Reforms (2002-2014) on Pupil Sorting and Social Segregation: A Greater Manchester Case Study Stephanie Thomson and Ruth Lupton 1 WP24 The Effects of English School System Reforms (2002-2014) on Pupil Sorting and Social Segregation: A Greater Manchester Case Study Acknowledgements This project is part of the Social Policy in a Cold Climate programme funded by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, the Nuffield Foundation, and Trust for London. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the funders. We would like to thank Somayeh Taheri for her help with the maps in this paper. We would also like to thank John Hills, Anne West, and Robert Walker who read earlier versions for their helpful comments. Finally, sincere thanks to Cheryl Conner for her help with the production of the paper. Any errors that remain are, of course, ours. Authors Stephanie Thomson, is a Departmental Lecturer in Comparative Social Policy at the University of Oxford. Ruth Lupton, is Professor of Education at the University of Manchester and Visiting Professor at The Centre for Analyis of Social Exclusion, The London School of Economics and Political Science. 2 WP24 The Effects of English School System Reforms (2002-2014) on Pupil Sorting and Social Segregation: A Greater Manchester Case Study Contents List of figures ..................................................................................................................................... 3 List of tables ...................................................................................................................................... 3 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 5 2. Changes to School Systems in the four areas .......................................................................... -
Stretford Grammar School Granby Road, Stretford, Manchester, Greater Manchester, M32 8JB
School report Stretford Grammar School Granby Road, Stretford, Manchester, Greater Manchester, M32 8JB Inspection dates 22–23 April 2015 Previous inspection: Good 2 Overall effectiveness This inspection: Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Outstanding 1 Quality of teaching Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Sixth form provision Requires improvement 3 Summary of key findings for parents and pupils This is a good school. Students achieve well. They make good progress Students’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural and their attainment at the age of 16 is well development is a strength of the school. Many above average in all subjects. opportunities are provided for students to consider All groups of students in Key Stages 3 and 4 make a wide range of ethical and topical issues. As a good progress. Disadvantaged students reach the result, they develop well-considered, reasoned same well above average standards as other views which they express articulately and students in the school and much higher than other sensitively. students nationally. The headteacher provides caring, committed and Students show exceptional attitudes towards their clear leadership based on striving for the very best learning and are highly motivated. for all students. He is supported well by the deputy Students learn well because in most classes headteacher and other senior leaders. The systems knowledgeable, skilled and sometimes they have introduced have ensured that middle inspirational teaching secures their interest and leaders have become increasingly effective. makes sure they make fast gains in their The actions taken have continued to improve the knowledge and understanding. -
Full Report (PDF 2
Geraldine Travers Report on Sabbatical 1 March to 24 May 2010 The purpose of my sabbatical was to look at examples of good practice in schools particularly focussing on leadership, literacy and raising achievement. Some of the nine schools I visited provided useful insights into all three foci whereas others were specific to one particular focus. Friday March 5, 2010 Keda Cowling and ‘Toe by Toe’ Baildon Yorkshire Toe by Toe is a programme designed by Keda Cowling to assist the dyslexic, as well as students who experience difficulties in learning to read for a variety of reasons. It has gained an international reputation and I was interested to find out about how it works and the philosophy behind it. Keda was born in 1926 and was a bright child at school however the prevailing economic circumstances of the time meant that she was unable to continue her secondary education and began working in a nearby textile mill. During the war she was put to work in a munitions factory. When the war ended opportunities opened up and Keda completed her education and enrolled in a teachers college. Her early life experiences gave her a great affinity for the underdog. Keda's husband built a house for the family in Baildon next door to school and as Keda was unable to drive it seemed to her to be a good idea to teach at the next-door school. The school had a vacancy for a teacher of second years, which Keda accepted although she had never taught this age group before. -
Ofsted Publication
Transforming religious education Religious education in schools 2006 ̶ 09 This report evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of religious education (RE) in primary and secondary schools and discusses the key issues at the heart of RE teaching today. It is based principally on evidence from visits to 94 primary and 89 secondary schools in England between 2006 and 2009. The sample of schools represented a cross-section, including voluntary controlled schools, but did not include voluntary aided schools, for which there are separate inspection arrangements. The report builds on the findings of an earlier report, Making sense of religion. Age group: 4–18 Published: June 2010 Reference no: 090215 The Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills (Ofsted) regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email [email protected]. You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. -
Specialist Leaders of Education 2018/2019
Specialist Leaders of Education 2018/2019 Specialist Leaders of Education Area Name School Setting Assessment Louise Rainey (also Science) Secondary Julie Sharrock (also whole school curriculum, timetabling, data and tracking, disadvantaged Secondary students and ‘diminishing differences’) Attendance & Behaviour Chris Airey Secondary Chris Hunt (also /Safeguarding/Leadership) Secondary Phil Pemberton Secondary Matthew Reynolds Secondary CPD/Facilitation/Leadership Andrew Dickens (also Maths and ITT) Secondary Jenny Ogunmyiwa Secondary Julie Sharrock (also Leadership, Closing the Gap, Assessment) Secondary Curriculum / Teaching & Kathryn Chapple (also Safeguarding & behaviour) Secondary Learning Data / Progress / Tracking Thom Copestake Secondary EAL Klaudia Giermaniuk Secondary Early Years Alison Dean Primary Jill Dring Primary English Amy Burkes Primary Helen Cleary Secondary Niamh Devlin Secondary Ben Dugdale (also Raising Attainment, Assessment) Secondary Monika Maloszyc-Gibbons Secondary Jill Martland Secondary Claire O’Hara Secondary Nichola Wiggans (also Leader of Curriculum) Primary Jonathan Williams Secondary Lucy Yeomans (also ITT, Leadership of Curriculum) Secondary Finance Edward Vitalis Both Food Technology Lou Clutton Secondary HR Lynette Beckett Both Humanities Sarah Butler (Humanities) Secondary Scott Davenport (RE) Secondary Huw Dickson (History) Secondary Sarah Frost (History / ITT / Leader of Curriculum / CPD) Secondary Laura Lakin (Geography - also Assessment for Learning, Global Learning) Secondary Melissa McMillan -
Secondary School Directory
Secondary School Directory September 2021 TRAFFORD SCHOOLS DIRECTORY SCHOOL: Altrincham College HEADTEACHER: Ms K Earle ADDRESS: Green Lane Timperley Altrincham WA15 8QW TELEPHONE: 0161 980 7173 EMAIL: [email protected] WEBSITE: www.altrinchamcollege.com SCHOOL’S CO-ORDINATES: 378541, 387514 (used to calculate the distance to school) GENDER: Mixed CATEGORY: Academy AGE RANGE: 11-18 TYPE: Secondary 2022 ADMISSION NUMBER: 175 2021 APPLICATIONS: 821 SEPTEMBER 2021 EXPECTED NUMBER ON ROLL: 970 SCHOOL: Altrincham Grammar School for Boys HEADTEACHER: Mr G Wright ADDRESS: Marlborough Road Bowdon Altrincham WA14 2RS TELEPHONE: 0161 928 0858 EMAIL: [email protected] WEBSITE: www.agsb.co.uk SCHOOL’S CO-ORDINATES: 376730, 386682 (used to calculate the distance to school) GENDER: Boys CATEGORY: Academy AGE RANGE: 11-18 TYPE: Secondary Grammar 2022 ADMISSION NUMBER: 202 2021 APPLICATIONS: 875 SEPTEMBER 2021 EXPECTED NUMBER ON ROLL: 1300 27 SCHOOL: Altrincham Grammar School for Girls HEADTEACHER: Ms S Gill ADDRESS: Cavendish Road Bowdon Altrincham WA14 2NL TELEPHONE: 0161 912 5912 EMAIL: [email protected] WEBSITE: www.aggs.trafford.sch.uk SHOOL’S CO-ORDINATES: 376119, 387212 (used to calculate the distance to school) GENDER: Girls CATEGORY: Academy AGE RANGE: 11-18 TYPE: Secondary Grammar 2022 ADMISSION NUMBER: 204 2021 APPLICATIONS: 908 SEPTEMBER 2021 EXPECTED NUMBER ON ROLL: 1350 SCHOOL: Ashton-on-Mersey School HEADTEACHER: Mr L McConaghie ADDRESS: Cecil Avenue Sale Cheshire M33 5BP TELEPHONE: 0161 973 1179 EMAIL: [email protected] -
Applying for Secondary School Places
Applying for School Places 2021 Secondary School Information for Parents This booklet contains information on the transfer from primary to secondary school, all school admissions policies, in-year transfers, travel assistance and other relevant policies. September 2021 Contents 2 Other Languages 3 Introduction 4 How to Contact Trafford School Admissions 5 Timetable for Secondary School Transfer Process 6 How to Apply for Year 7 Secondary School Places 8 Allocation of Places 10 Your Home Address 10 Your Right to Appeal 10 Review of Allocations 11 Waiting Lists 11 Information about OFSTED Inspections/League Tables 12 School Open Days/Evenings 12 Admission to Trafford Grammar Schools 12 In Year Transfers 2021 Academic Year 12 Fair Access Protocol 13 Travel Assistance 16 Other Relevant Policies 18 2021 Co-ordinated Admissions Scheme 23 Co-ordinated Admissions Timetable 24 Types (categories) of Schools 26 2020 Admissions Round Application Outcomes (1 March 2020) 27 Trafford Schools Directory 37 Admission Policy Documents 151 University Technical Colleges and Studio Schools 2 INTRODUCTION The transfer from primary to secondary school is an important milestone in the life of your child. For most children, the transfer to secondary school will be a straightforward process and the information provided in this booklet will help you make your decision. Some parents, where personal circumstances are different, might need more complex and detailed advice. I hope that the information in this booklet will help in even the most difficult of circumstances. In any event, the School Admissions Team is always available to give help and realistic advice. Trafford Local Authority (LA) is responsible for processing applications for transfer to secondary school, for all its residents, for any state funded secondary school, including academy schools and free schools. -
Review of Governance Interim Report – Lostock Hall Academy School, Lancashire
Review of Governance Interim Report – Lostock Hall Academy School, Lancashire Reviewer name Karina Carter, National Leader of Governance School Name of contact Margaret Scrivens Role Chair of Governors Name of school Lostock Hall Academy Contact details Sharon Hurst, Clerk to the Governing Body, [email protected] 01772 646101 Main issues raised by Ofsted The issues highlighted refer to the Governance of the Academy. In addition to requesting a Review of Governance, with a specific focus on the use of pupil premium, the report also stated: School leaders and governors have been complacent and have let the decline in achievement go on for too long. Governors have been slow to tackle the underlying causes of poor performance, such as weak teaching. Until recently the school did not have a clear idea of just how poorly students were doing because systems to check on students’ progress were inadequate. Governors have not challenged the school quickly enough to remove the large gaps in achievement that exist across the school. The Governing Body has not acted sufficiently swiftly to make sure that the funds the school received were targeted at improving achievement for this group of students. Governors bring considerable expertise from the outside world, and show loyalty and commitment to the school. They have developed much more confidence in holding the school to account and have a good grasp of where the strengths and weaknesses are. The very recently reorganised senior leadership team has begun to tackle the barriers to success with urgency and vigour. This team…has a clear line of sight on what needs to be done to improve this school. -
Stretford High School 10032433 Final Report
School report Stretford High School Great Stone Road, Stretford, Manchester, M32 0XA Inspection dates 7–8 June 2017 Overall effectiveness Requires improvement Effectiveness of leadership and management Good Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good Summary of key findings for parents and pupils This is a school that requires improvement Pupils in 2016, including the most able pupils, Teachers do not regularly require pupils to did not make good progress from their starting think deeply. They do not ask pupils to explain points. Current pupils’ progress varies across or extend their answers to questions. subjects and key stages because the quality of Leaders do not have a good view of the impact teaching is inconsistent. of additional funding for disadvantaged pupils Teachers do not build well on pupils’ prior and those in receipt of the catch-up premium knowledge, skills and understanding. As a on pupils’ outcomes. result, the most able pupils are not stretched Pupils’ progress in mathematics and science academically. has been below average, because of poor Some staff do not have high enough teaching over time. New subject leaders are expectations of what pupils should achieve. beginning to take appropriate action, and progress is starting to accelerate in these Some teachers do not check pupils’ learning subjects. carefully in lessons before moving on to the next stage. Some subject leaders do not routinely use information from feeder primary schools to support their curriculum planning or build on pupils’ literacy skills.