Letters to the Editor

Deligne/Zimin Initiative to preserving the Russian mathematical that our paper’s result was not new, Support Young Mathematicians school. and, worse yet, that he believes that As Russian mathematicians and We are deeply grateful to Pierre period three does not imply chaos!!! members of the American Mathe- Deligne for his noble initiative, which Ruelle seems to be aware of only the matical Society, the undersigned feel has already done a great deal to help first of our three conclusions: it is their pleasant duty to inform young Russian mathematicians to (I) (All Periods Exist.) For each positive integer k, there is a point fellow members via the Notices of a survive without giving up research. of period k. The Sharkovsky (1964) remarkable philanthropic initiative This initiative is a continuation of Theorem stated by Ruelle is indeed supporting young Russian research the generous international solidar- ity to Russian scientists which the a more general theorem than part (I), mathematicians undertaken by Pierre American Mathematical Society im- but our theorem does not stop here. Deligne and continued by the Russian plemented in the 1990s and is con- (II) (.) There is an uncount- philantropist D. B. Zimin. In 2004 tinuing today. able set S ⊂ J which satisfies: For Deligne wrote in a letter to one of us: We are extremely grateful to Dmi- every p , q ∈ S with p = q , “I just won the Balzan Prize. Half the try Zimin for his chivalrous support | n − n | = prize amount is for me to spend on lim infn →∞ F (p ) F (q ) 0, of Russian fundamental science, in a research project agreed to by the particular mathematics. D. B. Zimin a n d Balzan Foundation. I believe that one is one of the very few Russian busi- lim sup |F n (p ) − F n (q )| > 0. of the most useful ways to spend this n →∞ nessmen contributing money for the money (500,000 Swiss francs) would (III) (Divergence from Periodic Or- support of Russian mathematics. be for the benefit of the struggling bits.) The above set S can be chosen Russian school of mathematics.” so that in addition, (1) is satisfied for —Yu. Ilyashenko each p ∈ S and each Together with several collabora- Moscow Independent University, q ∈ J . tors of the Independent University Steklov Math. Institute of Moscow, Deligne implemented this Dyson’s elegant statement refers to (III). There is also a large literature idea by organizing the “Pierre Deligne —A. Sossinsky that recognizes (II) and refers to it as Contest for Young Mathematicians”, Moscow Independent University, “Chaos in the sense of Li and Yorke” a yearly individual competition of Institute of Mechanics research projects for young Russian, or “Li-Yorke chaos”. We support Dy- son’s view that the definition of chaos Ukrainian, and Byelorus mathemati- —A. Vershik cians, whose laureates are granted depends on the context; that is, it St. Petersburg Branch of Steklov depends on what you know about a a sizable three-year fellowship. To- Math. Institute gether with Victor Vassiliev, Deligne system or what you want to prove. There is a rich tradition of chaos in heads the jury of the contest, which (Received February 20, 2009) topology, where exponential diver- is run along lines similar to those gence of trajectories is not a useful used by the American NSF. Since Response to David Ruelle concept. 2005 Deligne comes to Moscow each Tien-Yien Li and I were delighted I fear that Ruelle’s version of chaos December to supervise the final de- to read ’s beautiful would leave mathematicians without liberations. During the past four article in the February Notices that a method of dealing with the simplest years, sixteen fellowships have been refers to our paper “Period three im- situations when he asserts “chaos oc- granted, and the money coming from plies chaos” as “one of the immortal curs if the exponential divergence is the Balzan foundation (having in gems in the literature of mathemat- present for long-term behavior, i.e., mind the future payments to recent ics”. We prove one theorem in the on an .” One of the most winners) has been entirely exhausted, paper, and Dyson reports on what famous examples of chaos is the but Deligne intends to continue the we may assume is his favorite part map α − x2 which has a chaotic at- contest by using his personal funds. of it. Assume there is a continuous tractor for a set of α having positive In 2006 the Russian philanthropic function F from an interval J to itself, measure (M. Jacobson). But there foundation “Dynasty” has organized and—to be brief—we assume there is also an open dense set in which the “D. B. Zimin Dynasty Foundation is a “period three” point a ∈ J ; that there is an attracting periodic . Contest for Young Mathematicians” is, F (F (F (a ))) = a = F (a ). Dyson Since it can be shown that there with the same jury and according to simply wrote “An orbit is defined to is only one attractor for this map, the same rules. According to the cor- be chaotic, in this context [emphasis such an α has no chaotic attractor. If responding agreement, this contest added], if it diverges from all periodic Ruelle (who is a superb mathemati- will run for two more years, after orbits.” cian) can prove there is a chaotic at- which it may be continued. The con- But then the June Notices came tractor for α = 3 /2, then I will declare tinuation of these two contests will with a Letter to the Editor by David his definition usable! He simply needs undoubtedly play a crucial role in Ruelle that made two assertions, to prove an infinite set of lemmas:

1232 NOTICES OF THE AMS VOLUME 56, NUMBER 10 Letters to the Editor for each positive integer N, there is Yorke prove that (for suitable maps an alternative perspective of nonneg- no periodic attractor of period N. I of the interval) the existence of a pe- ligible value for discussing the educa- make the following conjecture in the riodic point of period three implies tional opportunities that have arisen spirit of Gödel. a complicated situation reminiscent from the availability of computers. Conjecture. The map 3/2 − x2 has of the homoclinic tangle discovered As will immediately become evident, a chaotic attractor and there is no by Poincaré in his study of the three- what follows is primarily oriented proof of that fact using the usual body problem. Clearly, period three toward instruction through so-called axioms of set theory. implies Li-Yorke chaos. But when “honours” undergraduate calculus I believe that this impossibility of chaos in the solar system is discussed classes, assuming (perhaps some- proof would apply to the large class (Wisdom, Laskar, …), or other ap- what unrealistically) that, in such an of smooth dynamical systems that plications to the real world, another environment, an uncompromising alternate densely between chaotic concept of chaos is used, which refers approach to the subject is permitted. and periodic attractors to “chaotic” behavior for initial con- Most of the relevant memories as a parameter is varied. Ruelle says ditions in a set of positive volume in have their origin in the mathemat- “chaos” should apply only to attrac- the (phase) space where the dynamics ics department of the University of tors. (There are proofs for certain takes place. This condition (rather Capetown and date back to 1934. The very special cases like 2 − x2 .) than uncountability) must be im- offerings in that department included Attractor basins can be — posed because sets of measure zero courses in “applied mathematics”. due to the presence of chaos on an are physically invisible in the present There, you learned to formulate sim- uncountable compact invariant set situation. There has been a semantic ple settings from classical mechanics on the basin boundary. He would shift and, if the map x  a x(1 − x) in terms of differential equations, a leave us with no term for such sets!! of [0, 1] to itself has, for some value pursuit leading to inspiring enlight- After Ruelle said that chaos means of a , an attracting orbit of period 3, enment about the true significance “neighboring trajectories diverge ex- most people would not call this map of calculus. In stark contrast to this, ponentially,” he asserted that period chaotic (this is because the orbit of the introductory courses in formal three does not imply chaos! Here is Lebesgue almost every point tends calculus were as discouraging then a compromise. We can define chaos to the nonchaotic attracting period 3 as they are now. in this context as “exponential di- orbit). This being said, the map under In this last context, present educa- vergence for all trajectories on some discussion not only exhibits Li-Yorke tional practice is still operating in a uncountable compact invariant set”. chaos, but also what Yorke at some conceptual desert, being focused on In the spirit of mathematical fun, point described as transient chaos unenlightening manipulative tricks I propose the following conjecture (this is only transient, but visible on of formal differentiation and integra- using this concept. a set of positive Lebesgue measure). tion, the life of many of these being Conjecture. Assume F is a con- As to the very interesting problem supported by the suppression of tinuously differentiable map from an of logical decidability raised by Yorke complex numbers,1 and the need interval J to itself. Then period three (to decide if a point belongs to a set of for most of them having been made implies chaos. physical interest in parameter space), obsolete by the computer. This could be facet (IV) of the im- I think it has to be reinterpreted in In the context of numerical cal- proved theorem. And people could case one has physical applications culus, educational neglect was jus- still define chaos as they please. in mind. This is because physical tifiable in view of the absurdly large parameters have an interval of un- requirements of time and labor. —James Yorke certainty attached to them. One is (Memories dating back to 1942 are of University of Maryland thus led to perturbation problems spending hundreds of days calculat- [email protected] in differentiable dynamics, and Jim ing military firing tables with the help Yorke knows that those are usually of a Friden desk calculator.) Nowa- (Received July 10, 2009) very hard. days, computer-assisted pursuit of numerical calculus could easily be Reply to Yorke —David Ruelle made far more enlightening than the “Period three implies chaos” by Li IHES standard introduction to calculus. and Yorke is a beautiful paper, and [email protected] Unfortunately, even the modern much quoted, including by myself. mathematical computer software is This paper is at the origin of the use (Received July 15, 2009) mostly oriented toward applications of the word chaos in what has become in the precomputer style. In any case, “”, a multidisciplinary Calculus and Computers in the current products are much too endeavor involving mathematical, Mathematical Education big for student use. numerical, and physical techniques, It could well be argued that too 1 The novelist William Styron, whose imagi- that has contributed among other much has already been written about nation is of unsurpassable breadth and things to the explanation of the this topic. However, it is at least analytic depth, confesses in one of his short “Kirkwood gaps” in the rings of aster- conceivable that some of this hyper essays that he flunked “trigonometry” four oids between Mars and Jupiter. Li and senior citizen’s memories might yield times in succession.

NOVEMBER 2009 NOTICES OF THE AMS 1233 Letters to the Editor

The educational potential of com- puters can be illustrated most easily by elementary examples from classi- cal mechanics. Construct, by simple numerical integration, orbits like that of the earth around the sun, the path of a projectile—in a vacuum or affected by velocity-dependent air resistance. More generally, explore paths generated when the accelera- tion depends in various ways on posi- tion, velocity, time, and path length from the origin. Actually, in amateurish ways, I have written quite a number of old- fashioned c-programs for such pur- poses. It takes my low-level computer less than a second to produce an image file for a typical orbit. Sig- nificant additional benefits come from observing the effects of varying the relevant parameters and the er- rors resulting from large integration steps. Instead of the annual appearance In celebration of our twenty-fifth year, Budapest Semesters in of “new” calculus texts, which are Mathematics will host a gala reunion and mathematics conference often degraded in response to the disastrous backlash from the mid- in Budapest for BSM alumni, mathematicians who wrote letters of twentieth century’s “New Math”, recommendation for them and those people who have supported the mathematical education needs com- puter software enabling students to program over the past quarter century. create simple programs for tasks like the above from recipes they can Visit www.bsmath.hu for more information. write in a computer language as close as possible to ordinary text. Surely, development of such a language and associated compilers would be a re- warding project.

—Gerhard Hochschild University of California, Berkeley [email protected]

(Received July 19, 2009)

Editor’s Note: In my Letter from the Editor “My First Forty” (June/July, 2009 Notices), I referred to a cone model for mathematical interests, which was attributed to an anony- mous colleague. That colleague was Donald I. Knutson. Don, as my col- umn indicated, had moved on from academic mathematics, but retained his connections with the mathemati- cal community, and I wondered if he would see and recognize the refer- ence. Don passed away in July. —Andy Magid

1234 NOTICES OF THE AMS VOLUME 56, NUMBER 10