Warren County Morris Canal Greenway 25-Year Action Plan 399 Recommendationsintroduction : Greenway-Wide

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Warren County Morris Canal Greenway 25-Year Action Plan 399 Recommendationsintroduction : Greenway-Wide greenway Hardwick Township Blairstown Township Frelinghuysen Township Knowlton Township Allamuchy Township Hope Township Independence Township Liberty Township H ackettstow n Belvidere White Township Manseld Township Oxford Township Harmony Township Washington Borough Washington Township June 2012 Lopatcong Franklin Township Township Phillipsburg Greenwich Township Alpha Borough Pohatcong Township Acknowledgements Technical Advisory Project Team Committee Warren County Planning Department David Dech, Planning Director Dennis Bertland Richard Miller, Principal Planner Brett Bragin Albert Krouse, Senior Planner Don Brinker Brian Appezzato, Senior Planner David Detrick Elizabeth Roy, Principal Planning Aide* John Handlos Warren County Department of Land Mike Helbing Preservation James Lee, Jr. James Lee, III Corey Tierney, Director of Land Preservation Robert Smith, P.E. Langan Engineering Myra Snook Michael Szura, LLA, ASLA, Director of Landscape Architecture + Planning Nate Burns, RLA, ASLA, LEED-AP BD+C, Warren County Project Manager Board of Chosen Dan Badgely, LLA, ASLA, PP, Landscape Architect Freeholders Rachael Griffith, Staff Landscape Architect Heritage Conservancy Everett A. Chamberlain, Director Richard D. Gardner, Deputy Director Jeffrey Marshall, President Jason L. Sarnoski Karen Williamson, RLA, CPSI, Landscape Architect 4Ward Planning Todd Poole, Managing Principal North Jersey Transportation Planning Authority Scott Rowe, Manager Corridor Studies and Project Planning *Morris Canal Committee Staff Planner Megan Kelly, Principal Planner Regional and Subregional Studies Many thanks to all those who attended and participated in focus group sessions, stakeholder meetings and public open houses. Your comments and concerns played a vital part in the planning process and will contribute to the success of the Morris Canal Greenway. Morris Canal Greenway 25-Year Action Plan Table of Contents Morris Canal Greenway 25-Year Action Plan Executive Summary i Introduction 1 Purpose of this Plan 2 A Brief History 6 Why Tell the Morris Canal Story? 8 Current State of the Canal and its Resources 11 Project Approach and Methodology 12 Existing Features Study Area 17 Land Use 18 General Greenway Description 19 Transportation and Linkage Assessment 26 Land Development Plans and Regulations 28 Existing Organizational Structure 32 Demographic Analysis 38 Local and Regional Trails and Businesses 44 Economic Benefits 50 Natural Resources 55 Field View and Greenway Segments 58 Historic Assessment and Evaluation 60 Visioning and Public Process A Vision for the 25-Year Action Plan 81 Economic and Public Benefits Economic Benefits of the Morris Canal Greenway 91 Prospective Opportunities 99 Morris Canal Greenway 25-Year Action Plan Table of Contents Recommendations Introduction 104 Overall Greenway Trail Considerations 106 Greenway Segments Recommendations Segment 1: Morris Canal Arch to Lock Street 114 Segment 2: Lock Street to Route 22 132 Segment 3: Route 22 to Plane 9 West 146 Segment 4: Plane 9 West to Bread Lock Park 164 Segment 5: Bread Lock Park to Meadow Breeze Park 178 Segment 6: Meadow Breeze Park to Washington Borough 188 Segment 7: Washington Borough to Port Colden 198 Segment 8: Port Colden to Port Murray 212 Segment 9: Port Murray to Rockport Pheasant Farm 226 Segment 10: Rockport Pheasant Farm to Florence Kuipers Park 236 Segment 11: Florence Kuipers Park to Saxton Falls 250 Segment 12: Saxton Falls to Waterloo Village 262 Greenway-Wide Recommendations Resource Preservation Recommendations 270 School Education Recommendations 281 Public Education Recommendations 288 Economic Development and Funding Recommendations 313 Operations Recommendations 342 Land Use and Policy Recommendations 361 Public Participation Recommendations 371 Organizational Structure Alternatives and Recommendations 384 Study and Recommendations Maps Study Area Land Cover South Land Cover North Land Use Capability South Land Use Capability North Zoning South Zoning North Morris Canal Greenway 25-Year Action Plan Table of Contents Historic Resources South Historic Resources North Natural Resources South Natural Resources North Greenway Segments Map Physical Canal Conditions Recommendations Maps Appendicies Appendix A Review of Existing Planning Documentation Appendix B NJ DEP- Historic Preservation Office of New Jersey and National Registers of Historic Places Appendix C Meeting Minutes and List of Attendees Appendix D Volunteer Group Promotional Material and Information Examples Appendix E Recommendations from the Master Plans for Lock 7 West and Plane 9 West Appendix F Complete List of Opportunities and Constraints Appendix G Model Ordinance Appendix H Morris Canal Survey Index Appendix I Land Owners Survey Results Appendix J Rails to Trails and Liability Appendix K Master List of Action Plan Recommendations Appendix L Additional Canal-Related Sources Morris Canal Greenway 25-Year Action Plan Executive Summary Executive Summary What is the Morris Canal and Why is it Important? In 1821, many of the then 24 U.S. states were separated from one another because of poor transportation arteries. Because roads were not always suitable for heavy transportation, hauling by wagon was expensive and slow. In place of roads, canals were able to provide a more viable means of transportation to fuel growth. In New Jersey, Morristown businessman George P. McCulloch, brought together a group of citizens, to propose what would become the Morris Canal. By September 1825, 30 miles were under contract with 700 men digging the canal bed. Construction of the locks and inclined planes began later. Compared to other canals, the Morris Canal had to do quite a bit of climbing to go from the Delaware River to New York City. From Easton, the canal climbed step by step from one plateau to another and across lakes and rivers until it reached the Lake Hopatcong area, its summit level. From there, it descended to tide level at Newark. Locks overcame small changes in elevations, and inclined planes, used for the first time, overcame changes in elevation greater than 20 feet. On November 4, 1831, the first trip from Newark to Phillipsburg on the 90-mile canal was completed in about five days. In 1836, an 11.75- mile extension to Jersey City was added, making the main line of the canal 102.15 miles long. When all the navigable waters, including other feeder canals controlled by the canal company were combined, the full waterway covered 109.26 miles. Within this distance were 23 inclined planes and 34 locks consisting of feeder, outlet, tide, guard, and lift locks. Unfortunately, the canal became a victim of progress. While canals, including the Morris, enjoyed growth, railroads increasingly encroached on canal business. Even though the Morris Canal transferred east-bound shipments of coal from the Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad between 1856 and 1870, the maximum of 146,359 tons in 1867 dropped to 80,977 tons the following year and disappeared altogether after 1870. The loss of coal business to the Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad amounted to about 34.4% of the entire coal business transacted by the Morris Canal at that time. It would take another 31 years, though, before the legislature would pass a resolution on March 31, 1903, to investigate and recommend legislation to abandon the canal. As expected, the Photo of the canal near Brass Castle. Photo courtesy Photo of the Port Delaware. Photo courtesy of New of New Jersey State Archives Jersey State Archives Morris Canal Greenway 25-Year Action Plan i Executive Summary study commission reported there was no longer an economic reason to keep operating the canal and recommended abandoning it. On March 12, 1922, the legislature created a commission tasked with transferring the Morris Canal to the state. Eight months later, on November 29, 1922, the state of New Jersey acquired the canal with the exception of property within the town limits of Phillipsburg and Jersey City. In 1924, a bill provided that the Morris Canal and Banking Company continue as a corporation holding the property as trustee for the state, that members of the Board of Conservation and Development be made directors of the corporation. This meant that operation of the canal would end, that Lake Hopatcong, Lake Musconetcong, Cranberry Lake, Bear Pond, Saxton Falls, and Greenwood Lake be retained for public use, and that remaining property be sold.1 The Morris Canal is among 41 places listed in the National Register of Historic Places in Warren County. Each of these places tell stories about the people who lived in and “grew” the county. These historic places tell stories about transportation, architecture, engineering, commerce, politics, community planning, industry, education, religion and more. They tell stories about what challenged and inspired people’s lives. Today, they inspire newer generations of historians, artists, engineers, and others seeking to learn from and apply the past to the present by reading about and examining the artifacts we preserve. Today, people who time their fast-paced lives by the minute would be vexed by the slow- moving Morris Canal. People don’t know what it was like to live and work in the early 1800s, before trains were introduced, when waterways, including canals, were the transportation highways that helped build America. Today, canals, like other historic sites, are a reminder of that slower past. Boats left dock only when full and moved very slowly. It took five days to travel from Jersey City to Phillipsburg and
Recommended publications
  • OPEN SPACE and RECREATION PLAN UPDATE - 2009 for Township of Green County of Sussex
    OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION PLAN UPDATE - 2009 for Township of Green County of Sussex Compiled by The Land Conservancy with Township of Green of New Jersey Open Space Committee A nonprofit land trust May 2009 OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION PLAN UPDATE - 2009 for Township of Green County of Sussex Compiled by The Land Conservancy of Township of Green New Jersey with Open Space Committee a nonprofit land trust May 2009 OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION PLAN UPDATE - 2009 for Township of Green County of Sussex Produced by: The Land Conservancy of New Jersey Partners for Greener Communities Team: “Partnering with Communities to Preserve Natural Treasures” David Epstein, President Barbara Heskins Davis, AICP/P.P., Vice President, Programs Holly Szoke, Communications Director Kenneth Fung, GIS Manager Samantha Rothman, Planning Consultant Casey Dziuba, Planning Intern For further information please contact: The Land Conservancy of New Jersey Township of Green 19 Boonton Avenue Open Space Committee Boonton, NJ 07005 150 Kennedy Road (973) 541-1010 Andover, NJ 07821 Fax: (973) 541-1131 (908) 852-9333 www.tlc-nj.org Fax: (908) 852-1972 www.greentwp.com Copyright © 2009 All rights reserved Including the right of reproduction in whole or in part in any form without prior consent May 2009 . Acknowledgements The Land Conservancy of New Jersey wishes to acknowledge the following individuals and organizations for their help in providing information, guidance, and materials for the Green Township Open Space and Recreation Plan Update. Their contributions have been instrumental
    [Show full text]
  • Geospatial Analysis: Commuters Access to Transportation Options
    Advocacy Sustainability Partnerships Fort Washington Office Park Transportation Demand Management Plan Geospatial Analysis: Commuters Access to Transportation Options Prepared by GVF GVF July 2017 Contents Executive Summary and Key Findings ........................................................................................................... 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 6 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................. 6 Sources ...................................................................................................................................................... 6 ArcMap Geocoding and Data Analysis .................................................................................................. 6 Travel Times Analysis ............................................................................................................................ 7 Data Collection .......................................................................................................................................... 7 1. Employee Commuter Survey Results ................................................................................................ 7 2. Office Park Companies Outreach Results ......................................................................................... 7 3. Office Park
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Significant Views Along the Circuit
    PROTECTING SIGNIFICA NT VIEWS ALONG THE CIRCUIT: A VISUAL ASSESSMENT OF LAND CONSERVATION PRIORITIES FOR VIEWSHEDS ALONG THE CIRCUIT THE TRAILS RADNOR TRAIL March 2019 PREPARED BY: APPALACHIAN MOUNTAIN CLUB Catherine Poppenwimer Patricia McCloskey, AICP Dave Publicover PROTECTING SIGNIFICANT VIEWS ALONG THE CIRCUIT Contents Acknowledgments............................................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................................... 4 The Circuit ....................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Protecting Views Along The Circuit ................................................................................................................................ 4 Radnor Trail .................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Study Area Landscape ............................................................................................................................................... 5 Results for the Radnor Trail .............................................................................................................................................. 7 Radnor
    [Show full text]
  • Musconetcong River National Wild and Scenic Rivers Study
    Musconetcong River National Wild and Scenic Rivers Study River Management Plan Prepared by: Musconetcong River Management Council Musconetcong Watershed Association Heritage Conservancy National Park Service June 2011 Update The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the U.S. Government. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute their endorsement by the U.S. Government. Musconetcong National Wild and Scenic River Management Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This management plan proposes a strategy for managing the Musconetcong River and its many outstanding resource values. It was prepared as part of a study to evaluate the Musconetcong River for inclusion in the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. The Musconetcong River drains a 157.6 square mile watershed area in northern New Jersey, and as a major tributary to the Delaware River, is part of the 12,755 square mile Delaware River watershed. The Musconetcong River is a boundary water for its entire length, first dividing Morris and Sussex counties, then Hunterdon and Warren counties. All or portions of 26 municipalities lie within the natural boundaries of the Musconetcong watershed. Fourteen municipalities fall within the river segments eligible for National Wild and Scenic Rivers designation. The impetus for the Musconetcong National Wild and Scenic Rivers study can be traced back to 1991, when petitions were circulated calling for the protection of the Musconetcong River under both the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System and New Jersey Wild and Scenic Rivers program. In 1992, Congress passed legislation authorizing the National Park Service to study the eligibility and potential suitability of the Lower Delaware River for addition to the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Terminologies
    FISH TERMINOLOGIES Monument Type Thesaurus Report Format: Hierarchical listing - class Notes: Classification of monument type records by function.
    [Show full text]
  • LRM 9/27/01 Complete
    Public Meeting of NEW JERSEY LAKE RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY TASK FORCE LOCATION: Borough Hall DATE: September 27, 2001 Mt. Arlington, New Jersey 11:00 a.m. MEMBERS OF TASK FORCE PRESENT: Senator Anthony R. Bucco (Vice-Chairman) Assemblyman Reed Gusciora Carmen Armenti Matthew Garamone Dirk C. Hofman John Hutchison III James E. Mumman Frances Smith Mark Smith John Terry ALSO PRESENT: James Requa (representing Martin Bierbaum) Zina M. Gamuzza Director of Communications Hearing Recorded and Transcribed by The Office of Legislative Services, Public Information Office, Hearing Unit, State House Annex, PO 068, Trenton, New Jersey for Assemblyman Corodemus TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Anthony Albanese Chairman Lake Hopatcong Commission Mt. Arlington Borough, New Jersey 11 Arthur Crane representing Hibernia Fire Company Rockaway Township, New Jersey 12 Kenneth H. Klipstein Bureau Chief Division of Watershed Management New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection 20 Peter Rand Chairman Lake Arrowhead Club Denville, New Jersey 25 Charles Weldon representing Indian Lake Denville, New Jersey 30 Robert Caldo representing Cozy Lake Association Jefferson Township, New Jersey 31 Clifford R. Lundin, Esq. President Lake Hopatcong Protective Association Mt. Arlington Borough, New Jersey 33 John Inglesino Freeholder Morris County, New Jersey, and TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Mayor Rockaway Township, New Jersey 36 Joseph Nametko representing Lake Musconetcong Regional Planning Board Roxbury Township, New Jersey 38 Ronald Gatti Township Manager Byram Township, New Jersey 40 Schuyler Martin President Lake Swannanoa Sentinal Society Jefferson Township, New Jersey 43 Fred Suljic County Planning Director Division of Planning Sussex County, New Jersey 49 Senator Robert E. Littell District 24 52 mlc: 1-55 SENATOR ANTHONY R.
    [Show full text]
  • Pohatcong Valley Groundwater Contamination, Franklin Township
    ^ SDMS Document 106275 Pohatcong Valley Groundwater Contamination Franklin Township, Washington Township, Washington Boro Warren County, New Jersey Reference A - Base Maps 1 - u.S.G.S. Composite - Belvidere, Bloomsbury, Washington, and High Bridge Quads 2 - New Jersey State Map 3 - Warren County Road Map 4 - Washington Township Tax Maps 5 - Franklin Township Tax Maps 6 - New Jersey Atlas - Sheet 24 Reference B - Potable Water Analyses 1 - Memo - Brass Castle/Broadway Well Contamination 2 - Memo - Washington Boro Well Contamination Problem 3 - Correspondence - Warren County Health Dept. to Residents 4 - Positive TCE Results - Warren County Health Dept. Survey 5 - Laboratory Analyses Reference C - Hydrogeology and Water Supply Data 1 - Memo - Pohatcong Valley Hydrogeology 2 - New Jersey Atlas Geologic Overlay - Sheet 24 3 - New Jersey Atlas Water Supply Overlay - Sheet 24 4 - Well Tabulation Sheet 5 - Well Records and Logs 6 - Memo - Groundwater Use "Kittatinny" Limestone Aquifer 7 - Memo - Irrigation Wells 100018 ^ .:> /'// >m' (^ 'i( •/).-:' m '/ •I . //// V. ^^N^^ ^''« -'/, v^:-;: :^•< • t'-Ciujtle >} V' A :-:yj 7: / 'i^.X 4il2 ^•J\ UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 2?- / V GEOLOGICAL SURVEY % ^ N//^>; / /v'- BELVIDERE QUADRANGLE '^"^^^^-^^^^^ ^, /^ \ ^^r NEW JERSEY-PENNSYLVANIA V • /r \ .1 V, leJN ^5 MINUTE SERIES gOPOGRAPHIC)'/ 2^_A ^/„ BL' MSBURY QUADRANGLE ' \ NEW JERSEY \ \. 7 5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOCRAPHICJ '^ /alley '^1 '-7 \. '7, yr,-. 'Ha -.0^' A \ ../. 'C7 A 6M -j-V '355 .^ 1^ •/^. ^ r^M. "08 i-S ah enj iroii^J ^^>^ 0^ o o H u.«rN^- T7T*' CO tjq K r ^ .'"'.'V J^-^. >>«\ /^^^^^: iNpTo; y • •x ^^^.^ WASHINGTON QUADRANGLE ^' A NEW JERSEY 7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC) ^^ ^^^^^^^ ' / / HIGH BRIDGE QUADRANGLE ^^S^r^'y^ Aj/',/ "NEW JERSEY .
    [Show full text]
  • Photograph Collection Index
    Warren County Library Local History Photograph Collection From the collection of Frank T. Dale with contributions by Fred W. Heilich III Index 2011 Please note that a name listed in this index does not always indicate a portrait or photograph of that person; it could indicate that the person’s house, property, or business is the subject of the photograph. ACKERMAN, JIM See NJ – WARREN COUNTY – MANSFIELD TOWNSHIP – ROCKPORT……….v.15 ACKERSON, CHARLES T. (1845-1929) See NJ – WARREN COUNTY – CEMETERIES……….v.9 ACKERSON, LILLIAN (1872-1897) See NJ – WARREN COUNTY – CEMETERIES……….v.9 ACKERSON, MARY T. SNYDER (1846-1922) See NJ – WARREN COUNTY – CEMETERIES……….v.9 ADAMS, ABI See NJ – WARREN COUNTY – KNOWLTON TOWNSHIP……….v.14 ADAMS, AMI See NJ – WARREN COUNTY – KNOWLTON TOWNSHIP……….v.14 ADAMS, ANN See NJ – WARREN COUNTY – KNOWLTON TOWNSHIP……….v.14 ADAMS, DANIEL See NJ – WARREN COUNTY – KNOWLTON TOWNSHIP……….v.14 ADAMS, JESSE See NJ – WARREN COUNTY – ALLAMUCHY TOWNSHIP – HOMES……….v.4 ADAMS, JOSEPH See NJ – WARREN COUNTY – KNOWLTON TOWNSHIP……….v.14 ADAMS, MARY See NJ – WARREN COUNTY – KNOWLTON TOWNSHIP – CENTERVILLE……….v.14 ALBERTSON See NJ – WARREN COUNTY – FRELINGHUYSEN TOWNSHIP – SHILOH……….v.11 See NJ – WARREN COUNTY – KNOWLTON TOWNSHIP – WARRINGTON……….v.14 ALBERTSON CREEK See NJ – WARREN COUNTY – FRELINGHUYSEN TOWNSHIP – SHILOH……….v.11 ALBERTSON, CLARA See NJ – WARREN COUNTY – FRELINGHUYSEN TOWNSHIP – HOWARD’S VILLAGE……….v.11 See also NJ – WARREN COUNTY – SCHOOLS……….v.16 ALBERTSON, CLARISSA WHITE (1835-1898) See NJ – WARREN COUNTY – CEMETERIES……….v.9
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Warren County Transportation Plan
    Technical Memorandum 2: Needs Assessment Warren County Transportation Plan Tech Memo 2.1 Previous Studies Tech Memo 2.2 Equity Assessment Tech Memo 2.3 WikiMap Tech Memo 2.4 Data Assessment JANUARY 2021 Technical Memorandum 2.1: Previous Studies Warren County Transportation Plan SEPTEMBER 2020 Technical Memorandum 2.1 Previous Studies Contents Warren County Transportation Plan ........................................................................................................ 3 Liberty Township Master Plan ................................................................................................................. 3 Warren County Strategic Growth Plan-Transportation Technical Study .................................................... 3 Knowlton Township Master Plan Reexamination Report .......................................................................... 3 Washington Borough Downtown Redevelopment Plan ............................................................................ 4 Phillipsburg Walkable Community Workshop Report ............................................................................... 4 Morris/Warren County Rail Corridor Study .............................................................................................. 4 Phillipsburg Master Plan Reexamination Report ...................................................................................... 4 New Jersey Statewide Freight Plan .......................................................................................................... 5 Plan 2045:
    [Show full text]
  • FEMA Flood Insurance Study, Warren County
    VOLUME 1 OF 2 WARREN COUNTY, NEW JERSEY (ALL JURISDICTIONS) COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER ALLAMUCHY, TOWNSHIP OF 340480 ALPHA, BOROUGH OF 340576 BELVIDERE, TOWN OF 340481 Warren County BLAIRSTOWN, TOWNSHIP OF 340482 FRANKLIN, TOWNSHIP OF 340563 FRELINGHUYSEN, TOWNSHIP OF 340564 GREENWICH, TOWNSHIP OF 340483 HACKETTSTOWN, TOWN OF 340484 HARDWICK, TOWNSHIP OF 340528 HARMONY, TOWNSHIP OF 340485 HOPE, TOWNSHIP OF 340486 INDEPENDENCE, TOWNSHIP OF 340487 KNOWLTON, TOWNSHIP OF 340488 LIBERTY, TOWNSHIP OF 340489 LOPATCONG, TOWNSHIP OF 340574 MANSFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF 340491 OXFORD, TOWNSHIP OF 340492 PHILLIPSBURG, TOWN OF 340493 POHATCONG, TOWNSHIP OF 340494 WASHINGTON, BOROUGH OF 340495 WASHINGTON, TOWNSHIP OF 340496 WHITE, TOWNSHIP OF 340497 PRELIMINARY: AUGUST 31, 2009 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 34041CV001A NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data. Selected Flood Insurance Rate Map panels for the communities within Warren County contain information that was previously shown separately on the corresponding Flood Boundary and Floodway Map panels (e.g., floodways, cross sections). In addition, former flood hazard zone designations have been changed as follows: Old Zone New Zone A1 through A30 AE V1 through V30 VE B X C X Part or all of this FIS may be revised and republished at any time. In addition, part of this FIS may be revised by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shropshire Enlightenment: a Regional Study of Intellectual Activity in the Late Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Centuries
    The Shropshire Enlightenment: a regional study of intellectual activity in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries by Roger Neil Bruton A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of History and Cultures College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham January 2015 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract The focus of this study is centred upon intellectual activity in the period from 1750 to c1840 in Shropshire, an area that for a time was synonymous with change and innovation. It examines the importance of personal development and the influence of intellectual communities and networks in the acquisition and dissemination of knowledge. It adds to understanding of how individuals and communities reflected Enlightenment aspirations or carried the mantle of ‘improvement’ and thereby contributes to the debate on the establishment of regional Enlightenment. The acquisition of philosophical knowledge merged into the cultural ethos of the period and its utilitarian characteristics were to influence the onset of Industrial Revolution but Shropshire was essentially a rural location. The thesis examines how those progressive tendencies manifested themselves in that local setting.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Groundwater Resources of Greenwich Township, Warren County, New Jersey
    Evaluation of Groundwater Resources of Greenwich Township, Warren County, New Jersey M2 Associates Inc. 56 Country Acres Drive Hampton, New Jersey 08827 (908) 238-0827 EVALUATION OF GROUNDWATER RESOURCES OF GREENWICH TOWNSHIP, WARREN COUNTY,NEW JERSEY NOVEMBER 8, 2005 Prepared for: Greenwich Township Planning Board 321 Greenwich Street Stewartsville, New Jersey 08886 Prepared by: Matthew J. Mulhall, P.G. M2 Associates Inc. 56 Country Acres Drive Hampton, New Jersey 08827 (908) 238-0827 EVALUATION OF GROUNDWATER RESOURCES OF GREENWICH TOWNSHIP, WARREN COUNTY,NEW JERSEY TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1 GEOLOGY ...................................................................................................................... 5 LOCATION ..................................................................................................................... 5 POPULATION DENSITY.................................................................................................... 6 PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCE ............................................................................................ 6 TOPOGRAPHY ................................................................................................................ 6 SURFACE WATER .......................................................................................................... 7 Watersheds............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]