DOCSLIB.ORG

Breaking Global Deadlocks: the Future of International Governance

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Breaking Global Deadlocks: the Future of International Governance Breaking Global Deadlocks MEETING REPORT The Future of International Governance Architecture Mexico City Meeting Report #3 The Project March 10-11, 2008 The Centre for International Governance This is one of a series of meeting reports from the Breaking Global Innovation (CIGI), in partnership with the Deadlocks project. These meetings attempt to refine the concept of how Centre for Global Studies at the University leaders play an instrumental role in addressing pressing global issues. of Victoria (CFGS) and with the support Past meetings have included prominent individuals, including former of several other organizations, has since leaders, summit sherpas, and deputy ministers from most of the coun- 2003 led an extended multinational effort tries that have been identified as potential members of a new leaders’ to explore the practical prospects for forum (the G8 countries plus key emerging and regional powers). significant reforms to the institutions This meeting held in Mexico City explored international finance, gov- through which governments decide key ernance mechanisms to address climate change, and the reform of international issues. existing international institutions. The discussion also included debate about the expansion of the G8 to include key emerging powers and the Since its inception, the project has undergone role of a “world steering committee” made up of regional powers and several phases. During the initial phase, the powerful economies. concept of a leader's level G20 summit, or L20, was explored (www.L20.org). This top-level, intergovernmental forum would Global Economic Issues facilitate a commitment to breaking global deadlocks on issues that cannot be resolved This session addressed 21st century challenges to governance through other mechanisms. Pressing global architecture for international finance. There appears to be a crisis issues were examined in depth to test the – the West thinks its values and formulae are universal, whereas hypothesis that a more inclusive and well- many do not accept them. There was a bad start to the 21st prepared summit process would yield century – cooperation and multilateralism were the goals, but significant progress. confrontation and unilateralism prevailed. The global institutions are sixty years old and are outdated. In the finance area, they The project seeks to build upon the L20 include the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World project outcomes by exploring in greater Bank, the Bank of International Settlements (BIS), the Financial depth the importance of leadership in for- Stability Forum, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation mulating policy and catalyzing solutions and Development (OECD)’s Working Party 3, and the Regional to pressing global problems. Development Banks. Available for download at: www.cigionline.org/publications BREAKING GLOBAL DEADLOCKS In 30 years China, India, Brazil, Indonesia, and Korea (if One view was that there must be a Leaders’ “Steering unified) will be among the world’s 10 most influential Committee” and that it should not be based on variable countries. Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Nigeria will each have geometry.1 The question is not whether, but what kind. a population greater than 200 million. The world will be Powers from each region must be included, because the more complex and there will be new demands to address lack of representativeness will decrease legitimacy, and emerging issues. More structures and more international hence effectiveness. The discussion turned to the practical arrangements will be needed. It would be beneficial if a questions of the emerging new financial mechanisms for 16-20 country steering committee would work together, climate change. Climate change should drive developmental but only if the members themselves were to be bound by policies, since without a hospitable climate, development its decisions and rules. The reality is that the decisions of investments will be in vain. Unprecedented amounts of such a steering group will affect other countries. money are being committed to addressing climate change, much of it about to be entrusted to the World Bank and The IMF is being marginalized. Discussion of governance RDBs. The OECD’s Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness reform must go beyond votes, shares and executive board – calling for recipient partner countries to exercise genuine seats. The important factors are institutional memory and ownership over the process – seems to have had little the weight and influence of good people. Participants were influence. The Bali conference’s decision on the governance reminded that John Maynard Keynes wanted to abolish structure of the Climate Change Adaptation Fund has had the BIS, preferring a legal rather than an informal body. no impact. The World Bank will produce another top down Accounting standards, codes, and debt restructuring mechanism where outreach will be for information, not approaches are all informal and non-enforceable. There consultation. There ought to be concern because one cannot was a failure of regulatory agencies to monitor and afford business as usual practices which have plagued supervise; they ignored off balance-sheet activity. Leaders Official Development Assistance (ODA); these approaches could push standards bodies to be more inclusive. have generally led to failure. Instead, multi-faceted approaches should be devised rather than a single delivery Moments of crisis can lead to institutional innovation. The mechanism. Redundancies should also be built in to one-size-fits-all prescription tendered to Asian countries ensure local buy-in, local engagement and local decision- emerging from financial crises cannot be applied to the making. An analogue to the G8 Okinawa Task Force in United States. The world is facing a decentralizing trend, ICT is needed to devise optional financial mechanisms moving to a multi-currency order. This leads to the pre- and governance structures. scription that leaders should push the IMF to accept decentralization and become a central node of networks, It was conceded that starting anew rather than trying to rather than an institution. The IMF should accept regional reform the World Bank is necessary. A new paradigm and arrangements and look to the Regional Development new governance mechanisms needs to be found. Questions Banks as models. were raised concerning potential revenues flows from carbon trading schemes. Who will regulate the system? What new mechanisms can be developed based on a more generalized system of property rights for forests? Future financial flows will be the key element of any deal. The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Centre for International Today, China and India will not join the G8 since they do Governance Innovation or its Board of Directors and/or Board not want to compromise their G77 membership. If the G8 of Governors. does not accept expansion, a parallel institution such as the G20 could be established. Further, the G8’s arrogance Copyright © 2008 The Centre for Global Studies, University of Victoria, British Columbia (www.globalcentres.org), and The Centre for International Governance Innovation, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. (www.cigionline.org). This work is licensed under a Creative 1 Commons Attribution-Non-commercial – No Derivatives License. There was contention on this point – with some arguing that the composition of To view this license, visit (www.creativecommons. org/licenses/ such a group should vary to ensure the presence of the most appropriate countries, which varies depending on the problem at issue. The rejoinder was that personal by-nc-nd/2.5/). For re-use or distribution, please include this relations and institutional memory trump the argument. A consistent group will copyright notice. build empathy and understanding. 2 | Mexico City The Future of International Governance Architecture and obtuseness has created the possibility of a rival bloc Development, Political, and – the G5. At the Leaders level, there are several ways to get to a Leaders’ “Steering Committee.” Perhaps the Five Security Issues (and Indonesia) should convene their own summit meet- ing in 2009 and invite the G8 (having first secured the Climate Change acceptance of the next US president). The history of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change(UNFCCC), the Kyoto Protocol, and Discussion continued on composition. The G5 – the lessons from the Montreal Protocol were reviewed. These Gleneagles 5 – was created with little reflection. Indonesia lessons included the importance of scientific assessments should probably be added. But ultimately the subjects to simplifying issues for decision makers; development of be discussed, climate change or deterioration in the global safe alternatives; availability of funding to assist develop- economy, are more important than composition. Several ing countries; collaboration among industry, academics, participants advised not to build the case for a Leaders’ NGOs and government institutions; and monitoring and Steering Group based on legitimacy criteria; instead, the follow up. The Montreal Protocol evolved over a period of focus should be on effectiveness. The question should be years from a weak agreement with few countries to a robust who are the key players needed to solve the problem, and effective agreement, with manageable mechanisms emphasizing that this was a pre-negotiation steering group and with global adherence. that would send
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Walking the Talk: 2021 Blueprints for a Human Rights-Centered U.S
    Walking the Talk: 2021 Blueprints for a Human Rights-Centered U.S. Foreign Policy October 2020 Acknowledgments Human Rights First is a nonprofit, nonpartisan human rights advocacy and action organization based in Washington D.C., New York, and Los Angeles. © 2020 Human Rights First. All Rights Reserved. Walking the Talk: 2021 Blueprints for a Human Rights-Centered U.S. Foreign Policy was authored by Human Rights First’s staff and consultants. Senior Vice President for Policy Rob Berschinski served as lead author and editor-in-chief, assisted by Tolan Foreign Policy Legal Fellow Reece Pelley and intern Anna Van Niekerk. Contributing authors include: Eleanor Acer Scott Johnston Trevor Sutton Rob Berschinski David Mizner Raha Wala Cole Blum Reece Pelley Benjamin Haas Rita Siemion Significant assistance was provided by: Chris Anders Steven Feldstein Stephen Pomper Abigail Bellows Becky Gendelman Jennifer Quigley Brittany Benowitz Ryan Kaminski Scott Roehm Jim Bernfield Colleen Kelly Hina Shamsi Heather Brandon-Smith Kate Kizer Annie Shiel Christen Broecker Kennji Kizuka Mandy Smithberger Felice Gaer Dan Mahanty Sophia Swanson Bishop Garrison Kate Martin Yasmine Taeb Clark Gascoigne Jenny McAvoy Bailey Ulbricht Liza Goitein Sharon McBride Anna Van Niekerk Shannon Green Ian Moss Human Rights First challenges the United States of America to live up to its ideals. We believe American leadership is essential in the struggle for human dignity and the rule of law, and so we focus our advocacy on the U.S. government and other key actors able to leverage U.S. influence. When the U.S. government falters in its commitment to promote and protect human rights, we step in to demand reform, accountability, and justice.
    [Show full text]
  • 2006-Labour-Fights-A
    o A A Report on Workers’ Rights, Advocacy and International Solidarity www.canadianlabour.ca Labouro Fights AIDSA LABOUR FIGHTS AIDS A report on workers’ rights, advocacy and international solidarity ISBN 0-9689749-1-0 published by the Canadian Labour Congress, 2006 with the assistance of the Government of Canada (International Trade and Labour Program of Human Resources and Social Development Canada and the Canadian International Development Agency), as part of the first International Labour Forum on HIV/AIDS affilliated with the 16th International AIDS Conference ©Canadian Labour Congress, 2006 All rights reserved Design and layout by Tracy Carefoot Visual Printed and bound in Canada by Imprimerie Plantagenet Printing www.canadianlabour.ca Foreword Sisters and Brothers If there is one single truth common to the whole of It is with this tremendous sense of pride that the labour movement, its past as well as its future, I bring you this report from the Canadian Labour it is that working people win when they set aside Congress, “Labour Fights AIDS”. their differences and work together toward a Here, you will see how collective bargaining common good. helps workers living with HIV/AIDS and prevents its We call this solidarity, and it makes even the further spread. You will learn about the work labour most vulnerable workers stronger than they ever unions are doing in countries devastated by this imagined they could be. Through our solidarity, pandemic though the support of individual unions working people have shown we can change the and especially through the Canadian HIV/AIDS future for our families and our communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Debates of the Senate
    CANADA Debates of the Senate 1st SESSION . 37th PARLIAMENT . VOLUME 139 . NUMBER 123 OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Wednesday, June 12, 2002 ^ THE HONOURABLE DAN HAYS SPEAKER CONTENTS (Daily index of proceedings appears at back of this issue). Debates and Publications: Chambers Building, Room 943, Tel. 996-0193 Published by the Senate Available from Communication Canada ± Canadian Government Publishing, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0S9. Also available on the Internet: http://www.parl.gc.ca 2991 THE SENATE Wednesday, June 12, 2002 The Senate met at 1:30 p.m., the Speaker in the Chair. [English] Prayers. Honourable senators will recall the constitutional resolution adopted unanimously as well by the Senate, which led to the SENATORS' STATEMENTS amendment to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms by including section 16(2) relating to official languages in the province of New Brunswick. That amendment to the Constitution was made THE HONOURABLE JIM TUNNEY pursuant to the bilateral amending formula. TRIBUTE ON RETIREMENT Honourable senators are also mindful of the work of this Hon. Joyce Fairbairn: Honourable senators, today I want to say chamber in the protection and promotion of official languages a few words about a good friend of mine in this chamber who has throughout Canada. Therefore, I am confident that all challenged my mind with his knowledge and his wisdom, who has honourable senators will be supportive of the unanimous lifted my spirits with his laughter and unquenchable optimism, adoption on Friday last of a new Official Languages Act by the who has touched my heart with his humanity for those less Legislative Assembly of New Brunswick.
    [Show full text]
  • The Challenges of Inclusive Multilateralism
    The Challenges of Inclusive Multilateralism The 2012 Report of the Global Governance Group October 2012 The 2012 Report of the Global Governance Group Acknowledgements This Report was edited by Álvaro de Vasconcelos, Coordinator of the GG10 Steering Committee. The preparation of the Report received the gener- ous funding and support of the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland. The debates held at the “Evaluating Global Governance Workshop,” in New York on 4-5 June 2012 were crucial for the high quality analysis of the Report. Special thanks are due to the Council on Foreign Relations, in particular Mr. Stewart M. Patrick, who organized the workshop, and to all those who contributed insightful analyses and high-quality research. It was during the meeting in New York that the different authors of this Report decided to organise themselves into a permanent network of in- dependent researchers on multilateral governance under the name of the Global Governance Group (GG10). The publication of the Report was pos- sible with the support from the Economic Policy Research Foundation of Turkey (TEPAV), and from Atila Eralp, coordinator of the Secretariat of the GG10. The preparation of the Report also received the generous support of the EUISS, which that took on the secretariat of the project during its first year 2011, in particular Any Freitas, who played a role in all the phases of elaboration of the Report. I would like also to thank my research assist- ant Gerald Stang for his comments and inputs in the last version of the Report. Finally, thanks are due to Alexandra Barahona de Brito for her thorough revision, comments and language editing work.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada Fund for Africa
    CANADA FUND FOR AFRICA: SUMMATIVE EVALUATION EXECUTIVE REPORT Prepared by: Evaluation Directorate Strategic Policy and Performance Branch Canadian International Development Agency January 2011 Canada Fund for Africa: Summative Evaluation Canada Fund for Africa: Summative Evaluation ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report, prepared by the Evaluation Directorate of the Strategic Policy and Performance Branch (SPPB), consolidates the results of the Summative Evaluation of the Canada Fund for Africa. The evaluation was conducted under the supervision of Jacques Laberge, Evaluation Manager and was assisted by Safeena Alarakhia, Performance Review Officer of the Evaluation Directorate. The Evaluation Team Leader Werner Meier of the Results-Based Management Group prepared the Synthesis Report. Sector experts Keith Ogilvie, Isla Patterson, Jerry Rogers, Michael Miner, Simon Latraverse, Richard Label and Tony Vetter conducted the original background evaluation research. The Evaluation Directorate would like to thank the Evaluation Team for their hard work and diligence, their professional contribution to this important evaluation, and for their collective effort in addressing the challenges of a complex and arduous assignment. We would also like to acknowledge the assistance of the many individuals who made meaningful contributions to the overall evaluation process. This includes our colleagues within CIDA, the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade and Industry Canada as well as CIDA‘s Independent Evaluation Committee. Their readiness to facilitate the evaluation process, share their perspectives and provide valuable feedback on the draft reports was highly appreciated. Our thanks are also extended to the dedicated individuals in Canadian, multilateral and international implementing organisations who took the time from their busy schedules to meet with the team.
    [Show full text]
  • Extraction of Temporal Facts and Events from Wikipedia
    R S V E I T I A N S Universit¨atdes Saarlandes U Max-Planck-Institut f¨urInformatik S S AG5 A I R S A V I E N Extraction of Temporal Facts and Events from Wikipedia Masterarbeit im Fach Informatik Master's Thesis in Computer Science von / by Erdal Kuzey angefertigt unter der Leitung und betreut von / supervised and advised by Prof. Dr. Gerhard Weikum begutachtet von / reviewers Dr. Martin Theobald Second Reviewer April 2011 Hilfsmittelerkl¨arung Hiermit versichere ich, die vorliegende Arbeit selbst¨andigverfasst und keine anderen als die angegebenen Quellen und Hilfsmittel benutzt zu haben. Non-plagiarism Statement I hereby confirm that this thesis is my own work and that I have documented all sources used. Saarbr¨ucken, den 04. April 2011, (Erdal Kuzey) Einverst¨andniserkl¨arung Ich bin damit einverstanden, dass meine (bestandene) Arbeit in beiden Versionen in die Bibliothek der Informatik aufgenommen und damit ver¨offentlichtwird. Declaration of Consent Herewith I agree that my thesis will be made available through the library of the Com- puter Science Department. Saarbr¨ucken, den 04. April 2011, (Erdal Kuzey) To all members of Kuzey family... \Eternity is a very long time, especially towards the end." Stephen Hawking. Acknowledgements First and foremost, I am deeply grateful to my mother and father for their great support. I would not be where I am today without their love and encouragement. I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my advisor and supervisor Prof. Dr. Gerhard Weikum for giving me the opportunity to complete my thesis successfully. His guidance and support during my thesis were invaluable and motivated me for pursuing this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • The Challenges of Inclusive Multilateralism with Dignity in a Context of Climate Change and Scarcity
    Global Governance Group 10 Group Global Governance The Challenges of The world is in transition from unipolarity to polycentrism with a greater Inclusive Multilateralism multiplicity of actors, from states to civil society organisations, private actors, networks, and regional cooperation groups, playing an important role in shaping the future of citizens around the world. A global middle class is demanding a more effective multilateral system to deal with a number The 2013 Report of the of perceived global challenges but in a polycentric world there are both opportunities for greater effectiveness and a danger of fragmentation. The Global Governance Group 10 objective of this Report is to start a process of monitoring the adaptation of international institutions to the new realities of power. To do so, the Report looks at how global governance institutions are responding to global challenges, in particular those of political participation and of development Multilateralism of Inclusive Challenges The with dignity in a context of climate change and scarcity. The Report places the citizens and their aspirations at the heart of the analysis and it is with this perspective that we monitor the challenges of security with emphasis on the application of the principle of responsibility to protect. ISBN 978-9944-927-59-8 published for the Global Governance Group 10 by the Economic Policy Research Foundation of Turkey Secretariat of the GG10 2012-2013 [email protected] © Global Governance Group 10. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, pho- tocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the copyright holder.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Religious Leaders' Statement for the G8 and G20 Summits
    2012 Religious Leaders’ Statement for the G8 and G20 Summits We, religious leaders from G8 and G20 Nations, have come together preceding the 2012 G8 and G20 Summits. We come together in a spirit of pluralism, proclaiming peace and equality. In a tumultuous time of violence and economic instability, we come together to proclaim the best of each of our traditions, offering reflections and recommendations to the G8 and G20 leaders. As the 2015 deadline for the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) draws critically nearer, the G8 and G20 meetings are of vital importance for hundreds of millions of lives across the world. They offer the chance to look beyond the current MDGs, to the next generation of inspirational global goals. We are at a juncture where the political, humanitarian, military, and economic decisions of the G8 and G20 countries hold powerful influence over the lives and well-being of an untold multitude. We have come together in Washington D.C., on the eve of the 38th G8 Summit set to meet in Camp David, Maryland, USA. Members of the Baha’i, Buddhist, Christian, Hindu, Jain, Jewish, Muslim, Shinto, Sikh, and Zoroastrian communities have joined here to continue the work that has been done by religious leaders for previous “G” summits. Religious leaders have, over the past seven years, met to reflect on the global agendas before leaders of the world's most powerful nations and to offer their insights and hopes for the encounters. Our religious traditions are informed by deeply held and widely shared values to work for freedom, justice, and human rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter Aug02
    August 2002 A A V L D 1 2002 Executive Board Table of Contents Presidents Message......................................3 President.........................Pat Blanchard Executive Board Minutes....................................4-9 President-Elect............Terry McElwain Strategic Planning Session Minutes...........................10-12 Vice President.....................Willie Reed OIE Report..............................................................13-14 Immed. Past President......David Zeman Meeting Registration Form........................................15 Secretary/Treasurer..........Alex Ardans Hotel Registration Form.....................................16 Annual Meeting Schedule.....................................17-20 North East.....................Beverly Byrum CL Davis Immunohistochemistry Symposium...................20 South East..........................Fred Hoerr Validation an d Interpretation Workshop Registration.......21 North Central.........................Neil Dyer Annual Meeting Committee Agendas.....................22-26 South Central..................Melissa Libal Bacteriology Case Report Schedule...............................26 North West...................Donal OToole Scientific Sessions and Posters.................................27-34 South West..................Barbara Powers AVMA Congressional Fellow Applications.....................34 AAVLD House of Delegates.................................35-36 Canada Provincial..............Grant Maxie Exhibits and Posters............................................36-37
    [Show full text]
  • The Priorities of the French Presidency of the G8
    INTRODUCTION AND LEADERS’ pERSPECTIVES The priorities of the French presidency of the G8 France will urge G8 members to concentrate on areas where they can have a real impact, such as the internet, green growth and innovation, and nuclear safety By Nicolas he September 2009 G20 Pittsburgh Summit Sarkozy, president, marked a milestone in the reform of global Republic of France governance by making the G20 “the premier forum for international economic cooperation” to reflect the new global balances and the growing role of the emerging countries. In this context, the G8’s role has evolved but the original nature of Tthe forum has remained intact. As a result, the leaders of the most advanced economies are able to conduct direct and informal talks at the 2011 Deauville Summit. During its presidency, France has recommended that the ‘new G8’ focuses on issues where its members can have a genuine impact, avoiding duplication of the G20 agenda. The new common challenges: the internet, innovation, green growth and a sustainable economy, and nuclear safety Internet: This will be the first time that the internet is discussed within the G8 at the level of heads of state and partnership with the countries of the region involved to government. The future of the internet and its development support civil society and economic and social reforms, are major issues concerning both freedom of expression particularly aimed at young people, whose thirst for freedom and communication – as has been demonstrated with sparked off the liberation movements of the Arab people. the Arab Spring – and the global economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Breaking Global Deadlocks MEETING REPORT
    Breaking Global Deadlocks MEETING REPORT The Future of International Governance Architecture Mexico City Meeting Report #3 The Project March 10-11, 2008 The Centre for International Governance This is one of a series of meeting reports from the Breaking Global Innovation (CIGI), in partnership with the Deadlocks project. These meetings attempt to refine the concept of how Centre for Global Studies at the University leaders play an instrumental role in addressing pressing global issues. of Victoria (CFGS) and with the support Past meetings have included prominent individuals, including former of several other organizations, has since leaders, summit sherpas, and deputy ministers from most of the coun- 2003 led an extended multinational effort tries that have been identified as potential members of a new leaders’ to explore the practical prospects for forum (the G8 countries plus key emerging and regional powers). significant reforms to the institutions This meeting held in Mexico City explored international finance, gov- through which governments decide key ernance mechanisms to address climate change, and the reform of international issues. existing international institutions. The discussion also included debate about the expansion of the G8 to include key emerging powers and the Since its inception, the project has undergone role of a “world steering committee” made up of regional powers and several phases. During the initial phase, the powerful economies. concept of a leader's level G20 summit, or L20, was explored (www.L20.org). This top-level, intergovernmental forum would Global Economic Issues facilitate a commitment to breaking global deadlocks on issues that cannot be resolved This session addressed 21st century challenges to governance through other mechanisms.
    [Show full text]
  • A Disjunctive Prime Minister: Assessing David Cameron's Legacy
    A disjunctive Prime Minister: assessing David Cameron’s legacy blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/assessing-david-camerons-legacy/ 1/16/2017 David Cameron’s political career was cut short by last year’s dramatic Brexit vote. Chris Byrne, Nick Randall and Kevin Theakston look back on his time in office, and how the history books will judge him. For David Cameron 2017 will be a year of ‘exciting new challenges’. Chief among these will be joining the after dinner speaking circuit of former prime ministers and working on his memoirs. Both will demand he defend and rationalise his political legacy. The challenge facing him will be to overturn the conclusions arrived at by many commentators in June 2016. For most Cameron’s resignation was further confirmation, if any were needed, that “All political lives, unless they are cut off in midstream at a happy juncture, end in failure”. But Cameron’s premiership deserves an evaluation which recognises both his agency and the constraints arising from the conditions in which he governed. Such an assessment can be constructed by building upon Stephen Skowronek’s account of presidential leadership. This evaluates leadership performance by reference to the leader’s stance towards the prevailing ‘regime’ (a set of ideas, values, policy paradigms and their political interests and supports) and the extent to which that regime is resilient or vulnerable. 1/3 David Cameron, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, at his press conference during the 37th G8 summit in Deauville, France. Credit: Guillaume Palmier. Creative Commons License CC BY 2.0.
    [Show full text]