DOCSLIB.ORG

Full Edition 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Full Edition 1 WAKE FOREST JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW VOLUME 14 NUMBER 1 FALL 2013 AN EXAMINATION OF BASEL III AND THE NEW U.S. BANKING REGULATIONS Andrew L. McElroy .................................................................. 5 HOW TO KILL COPYRIGHT: A BRUTE-FORCE APPROACH TO CONTENT CREATION Kirk Sigmon ........................................................................... 26 THE MIXED USE OF A PERSONAL RESIDENCE: INTEGRATION OF CONFLICTING HOLDING PURPOSES UNDER I.R.C. SECTIONS 121, 280A, AND 1031 Christine Manolakas ............................................................... 62 OPEN SOURCE MODELS IN BIOMEDICINE: WORKABLE COMPLEMENTARY FLEXIBILITIES WITHIN THE PATENT SYSTEM? Aura Bertoni ......................................................................... 126 PRIVATE FAIR USE: STRENGTHENING POLISH COPYRIGHT PROTECTION OF ONLINE WORKS BY LOOKING TO U.S. COPYRIGHT LAW Michał Pękała ....................................................................... 166 THE DMCA’S SAFE HARBOR PROVISION: IS IT REALLY KEEPING THE PIRATES AT BAY? Charles K. Lane .................................................................... 192 PERMISSIBLE ERROR?: WHY THE NINTH CIRCUIT’S INCORRECT APPLICATION OF THE DMCA IN MDY INDUSTRIES, LLC V. BLIZZARD ENTERTAINMENT, INC. REACHES THE CORRECT RESULT James Harrell ........................................................................ 211 ABOUT THE JOURNAL The WAKE FOREST JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW is a student organization sponsored by Wake Forest University School of Law, which is dedicated to the examination of business and intellectual property in the legal context. Originally established as the Wake Forest Intellectual Property Law Journal in 2001, the new focus and form of the Journal, adopted in 2010, provides a forum for the exploration of business law and intellectual property issues generally, as well as the points of intersection between the two, primarily through the publication of legal scholarship. The Journal publishes four print issues annually. Additionally, the Journal sponsors an annual symposium dedicated to the implications of intellectual property law in a specific context. In 2009, the Journal launched an academic blog for the advancement of professional discourse on relevant issues, with content generated by both staff members and practitioners, which is open to comment from the legal community. The Journal’s student staff members are selected for membership based upon academic achievement, performance in an annual writing competition, or extensive experience in the fields of business or intellectual property. The Journal invites the submission of legal scholarship in the form of articles, notes, comments, and empirical studies for publication in the Journal’s published print issues. Submissions are reviewed by the Manuscripts Editor, and decisions to extend offers of publication are made by the Board of Editors in conjunction with the Board of Advisors and the Faculty Advisors. The Board of Editors works closely and collaboratively with authors to prepare pieces for publication. Manuscript submissions should be accompanied by a cover letter and curriculum vitae, and may be sent electronically to [email protected] or by mail to: Manuscripts Editor Wake Forest Journal of Business and Intellectual Property Law Wake Forest University School of Law P.O. Box 7206 Reynolda Station Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27109 COPYRIGHT © 2013 WAKE FOREST JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW ISSN 2164-6937 (Print) ISSN 2164-6945 (Online) BOARD OF ADVISORS DANNY M. AWDEH BARBARA LENTZ Finnegan Henderson Farabow Professor, Wake Forest Garrett & Dunner LLP University School of Law Washington, DC Winston-Salem, North Carolina CHARLES W. CALKINS JAMES L. LESTER Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton MacCord Mason PLLC LLP Greensboro, North Carolina Winston-Salem, North Carolina JUSTIN R. NIFONG KENNETH P. CARLSON Olive Law Group Constangy, Brooks & Smith, LLP Cary, North Carolina Winston-Salem, North Carolina MICHAEL S. MIRELES TRIP COYNE Professor, University of the Williams Mullen Pacific, McGeorge School of Law Wilmington, North Carolina Sacramento, California RODRICK J. ENNS ALAN PALMITER Enns & Archer LLP Professor, Wake Forest Winston-Salem, North Carolina University School of Law Winston-Salem, North Carolina EDWARD R. ERGENZINGER, JR., PH.D. ABBY PERDUE Ward & Smith, P.A. Associate Professor, Wake Forest University School of Law Raleigh, North Carolina Winston-Salem, North Carolina JASON D. GARDNER Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton COE W. RAMSEY LLP Brooks Pierce Atlanta, Georgia Raleigh, North Carolina STEVEN GARDNER T. ROBERT REHM, JR. Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, Smith, Anderson, Blount, LLP Dorsett, Mitchell, & Jernigan, Winston-Salem, North Carolina LLP ROB HUNTER Raleigh, North Carolina The Clearing House Payments SIMONE ROSE Company, LLC Professor, Wake Forest Winston-Salem, North Carolina University School of Law Winston-Salem, North Carolina Editor-in-Chief NATHAN G. HARRILL Managing Editor STEPHEN C. PRITCHARD Manuscripts Editor Notes and Comments CORY H. HOWARD Editors REBEKAH P. GARCIA Symposium Editor CHARLES K. LANE W. NICOLAS HARPER Executive Articles Development Editor Editors CLAIRE E. LITTLE ELISE J. ARSENAULT Marketing Editor MEGAN E. DRIGGERS JOHN W. TOTH SEAN P. GANNAWAY Articles Editors Senior Notes and Comments Editor LESLIE A. EVANS JACOB A. LOPES ROBERT C. HENDERSON III GARIN P. SCOLLAN Editorial Staff LINDSEY M. CHESSUM MEREDITH C. HEARN EMILY THORNTON STEPHEN S. DEGROW VICTORIA T. KEPES ZACHARY M. UNDERWOOD CHRISTOPHER R. DI GIROLAMO MICHAEL R. NORSWORTHY CAITLIN E. VAMVAKARIS CHRISTINE M. DONNELLY ASHLEY E. SADLER CHRISTOPHER M. WASSON REBECA E. ECHEVARRIA CAMERON STANTON EBBIE S. YAZDANI JAMES R. HARRELL BEN REED ZAKARIN Staff Members JOSHUA R. ADAMS JOHN G. HODNETTE ASHLEY N. QUARANTA DEREK M. BAST DAVID C. HOPPER B. CHASE SMITH SAMANTHA B. BERNER ANTHONY R. KEYS JUAN R. SOSA ASHLEY R. BROMPTON JINGBANG (REX) LI BRAY TAYLOR MELISSA C. BRYSON SCOTT L. MCEVOY BRINSON TAYLOR JUSTIN DAVID COOK JAMES P. MILLER ALEXANDER R. TELARIK JORDAN R. DONGELL JESSE MILLER JEB S. VAUGHN ZACHARY K. DUNN ERICA L. NAVALANCE STEPHEN J. WHITE CAITLIN S. HALE HANNAH NICHOLES REBECCA S. WINDER NATHANIEL C. HARRIS ANDREW W. POWELL CHRISTINE CARR YORK M. RILEY PHILLIPS Faculty Advisors BARBARA R. LENTZ ALAN R. PALMITER ABBY PERDUE SIMONE A. ROSE WAKE FOREST JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW VOLUME 14 FALL 2013 NUMBER 1 AN EXAMINATION OF BASEL III AND THE NEW U.S. BANKING REGULATIONS Andrew L. McElroy† I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................. 7 II. ANALYSIS ......................................................................... 9 A. THE RE-DEFINITION OF REGULATORY CAPITAL AND THE MINIMUM CAPITAL RATIO .............................. 9 B. THE CAPITAL CONSERVATION BUFFER ...................... 10 C. THE COUNTERCYCLICAL CAPITAL BUFFER ................ 13 D. GLOBAL SYSTEMICALLY IMPORTANT BANKS ............ 15 E. THE LEVERAGE RATIO ................................................ 17 F. LIQUIDITY REQUIREMENTS ......................................... 20 G. THE LIQUIDITY COVERAGE RATIO ............................. 21 H. THE NET STABLE FUNDING RATIO ............................. 23 III. CONCLUSION ................................................................ 25 † J.D., Stanford Law School; M.Fin., Princeton University; Sc.B., Brown University. The author is a corporate law attorney at Sullivan & Cromwell in New York. He would like to give a special thank you to his family and friends, especially his loving parents. He would also like to thank Professors Joseph Grundfest and Michael Klausner for their guidance and support. Additionally, the Author would like to thank the editors and staff members of the Wake Forest Journal of Business and Intellectual Property Law for their many hours of hard work to prepare this Article for publication. 6 WAKE FOREST J. [VOL. 14 BUS. & INTELL. PROP. L. ABSTRACT The Basel III framework represents a sea change in the banking industry in terms of the capital charges and liquidity requirements that banks will face. In order to respond to these new regulatory challenges, banks must adapt their decision-making paradigm in a strategic way that responds to the new rules and allows them to remain competitive. This framework, however, is a complex mosaic of consultative documents, incremental enhancements, revisions to those documents, academic research studies, and other references. With the publication of the revised Basel III capital rules in June 2011, the United States capital rules in June 2012, and the Basel III liquidity rules in January 2013, the major regulatory pieces are now in place, and the new banking regime is coming into focus. This Article synthesizes the relevant documents and explains their importance within the broader regulatory framework. 2013] [BASEL III AND THE NEW 7 U.S. BANKING REGULATIONS] I. INTRODUCTION The United States banking agencies have recently begun implementing the most sweeping reforms of U.S. banking law since the introduction of risk-based capital adequacy requirements in 1989.1 Now, as then, U.S. banking agencies are implementing much of the Basel framework, and the changes to U.S. banking law will be far- reaching: the re-definition of regulatory capital, the introduction of risk-based capital adequacy tests, a modification of the leverage ratio, and the introduction of liquidity requirements. The true
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Monetizing Infringement
    University of Colorado Law School Colorado Law Scholarly Commons Articles Colorado Law Faculty Scholarship 2020 Monetizing Infringement Kristelia García University of Colorado Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/articles Part of the Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons, Intellectual Property Law Commons, Law and Economics Commons, and the Legislation Commons Citation Information Kristelia García, Monetizing Infringement, 54 U.C. DAVIS L. REV. 265 (2020), available at https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/articles/1308. Copyright Statement Copyright protected. Use of materials from this collection beyond the exceptions provided for in the Fair Use and Educational Use clauses of the U.S. Copyright Law may violate federal law. Permission to publish or reproduce is required. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Colorado Law Faculty Scholarship at Colorado Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of Colorado Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Monetizing Infringement Kristelia García* The deterrence of copyright infringement and the evils of piracy have long been an axiomatic focus of both legislators and scholars. The conventional view is that infringement must be curbed and/or punished in order for copyright to fulfill its purported goals of incentivizing creation and ensuring access to works. This Essay proves this view false by demonstrating that some rightsholders don’t merely tolerate, but actually encourage infringement, both explicitly and implicitly, in a variety of different situations and for one common reason: they benefit from it.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1: Synthesis
    7 | SYNTHESIS CHAPTER 1. SYNTHESIS This chapter provides the rationale and context for Enquiries into Intellectual Property’s Economic Impact and highlights its most significant findings. In doing so, the chapter presents the major themes of the overall report, which are 1) the importance of various types of intellectual property as sources of growth and innovation in today’s economies; and 2) the effects on IP systems and stakeholders of major developments such as content digitisation, the growth of the Internet, and globalisation. The statistical data for Israel are supplied by and under the responsibility of the relevant Israeli authorities or third party. The use of such data by the OECD is without prejudice to the status of the Golan Heights, East Jerusalem and Israeli settlements in the West Bank under the terms of international law. It should be noted that statistical data on Israeli patents and trademarks are supplied by the patent and trademark offices of the relevant countries. ENQUIRIES INTO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY'S ECONOMIC IMPACT © OECD 2015 8 | SYNTHESIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Key challenges • Copyright appears to be the type of IP that has been attracting business investment at the highest growth rate and it is undergoing statutory review in many countries, yet there are fewer empirical studies about copyright than about patents. Encouraging and enabling the collection and availability of more data on copyright would facilitate data-driven copyright policy. In fact, robust evidence on the use of IP rights generally and on their economic and social impacts is essential for sound IP systems. Presently, however, relatively little concrete evidence is available to support the common assumption that IP rights encourage greater innovation and creativity.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2019 Vol.21, No.3 Screenwriter Film | Television | Radio | Digital Media
    CANADIAN CANADA $7 SUMMER 2019 VOL.21, NO.3 SCREENWRITER FILM | TELEVISION | RADIO | DIGITAL MEDIA A Rock Star in the Writers’ Room: Bringing Jann Arden to the small screen Crafting Canadian Horror Stories — and why we’re so good at it Celebrating the 23rd annual WGC Screenwriting Awards Emily Andras How she turned PM40011669 Wynonna Earp into a fan phenomenon Congratulations to Emily Andras of SPACE’s Wynonna Earp, Sarah Dodd of CTV’s Cardinal, and all of the other 2019 WGC Screenwriting Award winners. Proud to support Canada’s creative community. CANADIAN SCREENWRITER The journal of the Writers Guild of Canada Vol. 21 No. 3 Summer 2019 ISSN 1481-6253 Publication Mail Agreement Number 400-11669 Publisher Maureen Parker Editor Tom Villemaire [email protected] Contents Director of Communications Lana Castleman Cover Editorial Advisory Board There’s #NoChill When it Comes Michael Amo to Emily Andras’s Wynonna Earp 6 Michael MacLennan How 2019’s WGC Showrunner Award winner Emily Susin Nielsen Andras and her room built a fan and social media Simon Racioppa phenomenon — and why they’re itching to get back in Rachel Langer the saddle for Wynonna’s fourth season. President Dennis Heaton (Pacific) By Li Robbins Councillors Michael Amo (Atlantic) Features Mark Ellis (Central) What Would Jann Do? 12 Marsha Greene (Central) That’s exactly the question co-creators Leah Gauthier Alex Levine (Central) and Jennica Harper asked when it came time to craft a Anne-Marie Perrotta (Quebec) heightened (and hilarious) fictional version of Canadian Andrew Wreggitt (Western) icon Jann Arden’s life for the small screen.
    [Show full text]
  • Amd Driver 17.11.2 Download DRIVER RADEON V17.11.2 for WINDOWS 7 DOWNLOAD
    amd driver 17.11.2 download DRIVER RADEON V17.11.2 FOR WINDOWS 7 DOWNLOAD. The headline changes to switch optimization between graphics support for free. Rx vega radeon setting enhanced sync - amd rx vega radeon relive. 330 free download the release notes for free. Show me where to locate my serial number or snid on my device. The system might tells you it is not supported but do not mind that. Issues with access violations, Community. Gpu workload, a new toggle in radeon settings that can be found under the gaming, global settings options. Power supply power to manually requires some computer hardware. Amd for radeon products such as 17. Windows operating systems only or select your device. This package includes laptop and patience. Ethereum + OpenCL Benchmarks With The Latest AMDGPU-PRO. This toggle will allow you to switch optimization between graphics or compute workloads on select radeon rx 500, radeon rx 400, radeon r9 390, radeon r9 380, radeon r9 290 and radeon r9 285 series graphics products. The radeon software adrenalin 2020 edition 20.3.1 configuration scored an average of 139.1 fps, while the 20.2.2 edition configuration scored an average of 133.1 fps, showing an 5% uplift driver over driver. Download new and previously released drivers including support software, bios, utilities, firmware and patches for intel products. The amd product verification tool, donlot driver number of. Download latest reply on this page. A4-6300 apu with the samsung devices. This is a number for mac. Downloaded 5193 times, i was created, and 11.
    [Show full text]
  • SAPPHIRE R9 285 2GB GDDR5 ITX COMPACT OC Edition (UEFI)
    Specification Display Support 4 x Maximum Display Monitor(s) support 1 x HDMI (with 3D) Output 2 x Mini-DisplayPort 1 x Dual-Link DVI-I 928 MHz Core Clock GPU 28 nm Chip 1792 x Stream Processors 2048 MB Size Video Memory 256 -bit GDDR5 5500 MHz Effective 171(L)X110(W)X35(H) mm Size. Dimension 2 x slot Driver CD Software SAPPHIRE TriXX Utility DVI to VGA Adapter Mini-DP to DP Cable Accessory HDMI 1.4a high speed 1.8 meter cable(Full Retail SKU only) 1 x 8 Pin to 6 Pin x2 Power adaptor Overview HDMI (with 3D) Support for Deep Color, 7.1 High Bitrate Audio, and 3D Stereoscopic, ensuring the highest quality Blu-ray and video experience possible from your PC. Mini-DisplayPort Enjoy the benefits of the latest generation display interface, DisplayPort. With the ultra high HD resolution, the graphics card ensures that you are able to support the latest generation of LCD monitors. Dual-Link DVI-I Equipped with the most popular Dual Link DVI (Digital Visual Interface), this card is able to display ultra high resolutions of up to 2560 x 1600 at 60Hz. Advanced GDDR5 Memory Technology GDDR5 memory provides twice the bandwidth per pin of GDDR3 memory, delivering more speed and higher bandwidth. Advanced GDDR5 Memory Technology GDDR5 memory provides twice the bandwidth per pin of GDDR3 memory, delivering more speed and higher bandwidth. AMD Stream Technology Accelerate the most demanding applications with AMD Stream technology and do more with your PC. AMD Stream Technology allows you to use the teraflops of compute power locked up in your graphics processer on tasks other than traditional graphics such as video encoding, at which the graphics processor is many, many times faster than using the CPU alone.
    [Show full text]
  • INTELLECTUAL PRIVILEGE: Copyright, Common Law, and The
    INTELLECTUAL PRIVILEGE Copyright, Common Law, and the Common Good TOM W. BELL Arlington, Virginia Founders’ Copyright 2014 by Tom Bell. (See opposite for more information.) Second printing, April 2018 Printed in the United States of America Mercatus Center at George Mason University 3434 Washington Blvd., 4th Floor Arlington, VA 22201 www.mercatus.org 703-993-4930 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Bell, Tom W. Intellectual privilege : copyright, common law, and the common good / Tom W. Bell. pages cm ISBN 978-0-9892193-8-9 (pbk.) -- ISBN 978-0-9892193-9-6 (e-book (kindle)) 1. Copyright--United States. I. Title. KF2994.B45 2014 346.7304’82--dc23 2014005816 COPYRIGHT NOTE Not long ago, in “Five Reforms for Copyright” (chapter 7 of Copyright Unbalanced: From Incentive to Excess, published by the Mercatus Center at George Mason University in 2012), I suggested that the United States should return to the kind of copyright the Founders supported: the one they created in their 1790 Copyright Act. The Founders’ copyright had a term of only fourteen years with the option to renew for another fourteen. It conditioned copyright on the satisfaction of strict statutory formali- ties and covered only maps, charts, and books. The Founders’ copyright protected only against unauthorized reproductions and offered only com- paratively limited remedies. This book follows through on that policy advice. The Mercatus Center and I agreed to publish it under terms chosen to recreate the legal effect of the Founders’ 1790 Copyright Act. For example, the book’s copy- right will expire in 2042 (if not before), and you should feel free to make a movie or other derivative work at any time.
    [Show full text]
  • Register of Copyr1ght.S
    SIXTY-NINTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE REGISTER OF COPYR1GHT.S FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 1966 COPYRIGHT OFFICE THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS IL.C. Card No. 10-36017 This report is reprinted from the Annual Report of the Libdnof Congreee for the fiscal year ending June 30,1966 Contents THECOPYRIGHT OFFICE ............................ 1 The Year's Copyright Business ......................... 2 Official publications .............................. 4 Copyright Contributions to the Library of Congress ................ 4 Administrative Developments ........................... 4 Problems of Registrability ........................... 5 Organizational Problems ............................ 5 Notices of Intention To Use ...................... : ... 5 Legislative Developments ............................ 6 Judicial Developments ..............................8 Performing Rights and Community Antenna Systems ............... 8 Rights of Exhibition and Copying ....................... 10 Author's "Moral Right" ........................... 11 Subject Matter of Copyright ......................... 13 Publication ................................. 16 Notice of Copyright ............................. 17 Copyright Registration ............................ 19 Ownership. Assignment. and Renewal of Copyright ............... 21 Infringement and Remedies .........................23 Other Judicial Developments .........................26 International Developments .......................... 28 Tables: International Copyright Relations of the United States as of December
    [Show full text]
  • Exceptions and Limitations to Intellectual Property Rights with Special Reference to Patent and Copyright Law
    EXCEPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO PATENT AND COPYRIGHT LAW Thesis submitted to Cochiin Uniiversiity of Sciience and Technollogy for the award of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Faculty of Law By SALEENA K. B Under the guidance of Prof. Dr. N. S. GOPALAKRISHNAN (Director, IUCIPRS, CUSAT) SCHOOL OF LEGAL STUDIES COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY COCHIN-682 022 2011 School of Legal Studies Cochin University of Science and Technology Kochi – 682 022, Kerala, India Ph: 91-484-2862487 (O), 2577542 (R) Prof. Dr. N. S. GOPALAKRISHNAN Fax: 91-484-2575463(Direct), 2577595 Professor HRD Chair on IPR E-mail:[email protected] ; [email protected] This is to certify that this thesis entitled “Exceptions and Limitations to Intellectual Property Rights with Special Reference to Patent and Copyright Law” submitted by Ms. Saleena K.B for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, is to the best of my knowledge, the record of bonafide research carried out under my guidance and supervision from 13.09.2006 at School of Legal Studies, Cochin University of Science and Technology. This thesis or any part thereof has not been submitted elsewhere for any other degree. Cochin Dr. N. S. Gopalakrishnan 19/10/2011 (Research Guide) This is to certify that the important research findings included in the thesis entitled “Exceptions and Limitations to Intellectual Property Rights with Special Reference to Patent and Copyright Law” have been presented in a research seminar at School of legal Studies, Cochin University of Science and technology on 2nd May 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • AMD Catalyst™ Software Suite Version 12.3 Release Notes
    Page 1 of 4 AMD Catalyst™ Software Suite Version 12.3 • Back Release Notes Last Updated 3/28/2012 Article Number 158 This article provides information on the latest posting of AMD’s software suite, AMD Catalyst™12.3. This particular software suite updates the AMD display driver and the AMD Catalyst Control Center/ AMD Vision Engine Control Center. This unified driver has been updated to provide enhanced level of power, performance, and reliability. Package Content The AMD Catalyst software suite 12.3 contains the following: • AMD display driver version 8.951 • HydraVision™ for Windows Vista ® and Windows ® 7 • Southbridge/IXP Driver • AMD Catalyst Control Center version 8.951 / AMD Vision Engine Control Center version 8.951 Important! Caution! • The AMD Catalyst Control Center/ AMD Vision Engine Control Center requires that the Microsoft® .NET Framework SP1 be installed for Windows XP and Windows Vista. Without .NET SP1 installed, the AMD Catalyst Control Center / AMD Vision Engine Control Center will not launch properly and the user will see an error message. Notes. • When installing the AMD Catalyst driver for Windows operating system, the user must be logged on as Administrator or have Administrator rights to complete the installation of the AMD Catalyst driver. • The Catalyst driver requires Windows 7 Service Pack 1 to be installed. • These release notes provide information on the AMD display driver only. For information on the ATI Multimedia Center™, HydraVision, HydraVision Basic Edition, Remote Wonder, or the Southbridge/IXP driver, please refer to their respective release notes found at : http://support.amd.com/. • AMD Eyefinity technology gives gamers access to high display resolutions.
    [Show full text]
  • System Requirements for Virtual Classes Updated 5/11/2020
    System Requirements for Virtual Classes Updated 5/11/2020 See also: ​Software List for Virtual Classes​ (includes installation instructions) After signing up your child for one of Empow’s virtual classes, it is highly advised to install the appropriate software or create an account for the class. Each class description will contain one or more of the following tools, and all classes require Zoom. Please take careful note of which operating systems (OSes) are required for the software that your child will be using in classes they are registered in. In most cases a computer is required rather than a tablet. Zoom: Supported OSes: Windows XP+, Mac OS 10.7+, Linux, ChromeOS Supported Tablets: iPad 2 or later with iPadOS 13+, Android 4.0+ with 1Ghz processor or better Required: ​Microphone Recommended: ​Headphones Recommended: ​Webcam Install AND Account creation required https://zoom.us/download EV3 Programming: OS requirements: Windows Vista or later, or Mac OS 10.6 - 10.14 ---​ ​DOES NOT WORK IN OS 10.15 Catalina Other requirements: Dual core processor - 2.0 Ghz or higher, 2GB of RAM, 2GB of hard drive space. Install required. https://www.lego.com/en-us/themes/mindstorms/downloads Scroll down the page to find the download for either Mac or Windows. Telephone #: 617-395-7527 x300 Website: empow.me Flowlab: Recommended Browsers: Chrome, Firefox, Safari No install required. HUE Animation PC requirements: Windows 10, 8, 7 or XP and graphics drivers with OpenGL 2.0 support Mac requirements: OS X 10.5 (Leopard) to macOS 10.14 (Mojave). ​DOES NOT
    [Show full text]
  • The 2019 Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market: Some Progress, a Few Bad Choices, and an Overall Failed Ambition Séverine Dusollier
    The 2019 Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market: Some progress, a few bad choices, and an overall failed ambition Séverine Dusollier To cite this version: Séverine Dusollier. The 2019 Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market: Some progress, a few bad choices, and an overall failed ambition. Common Market Law Review, Kluwer Law International, 2020, 57 (4), pp.979 - 1030. hal-03230170 HAL Id: hal-03230170 https://hal-sciencespo.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03230170 Submitted on 19 May 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. COMMON MARKET LAW REVIEW CONTENTS Vol. 57 No. 4 August 2020 Editorial comments: Not mastering the Treaties: The German Federal Constitutional Court’s PSPP judgment 965-978 Articles S. Dusollier, The 2019 Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market: Some progress, a few bad choices, and an overall failed ambition 979-1030 G. Marín Durán, Sustainable development chapters in EU free trade agreements: Emerging compliance issues 1031-1068 M. Penades Fons, The effectiveness of EU law and private arbitration 1069-1106 Case law A. Court of Justice EU judicial independence decentralized: A.K., M.
    [Show full text]
  • New Copyright Law of Poland Analysis of Library-Related Provisions
    NEW COPYRIGHT LAW OF POLAND ANALYSIS OF LIBRARY-RELATED PROVISIONS Act No. 83 of February 4, 1994, on Copyright and Neighboring Rights (as amended up to May 20, 2016) Written by Barbara Szczepańska Edited by Teresa Hackett and Barbara Szczepańska August 2016 On 20 November 2015, Poland’s new copyright law entered into force bringing library services in Poland into the twenty-first century. This document sets out to analyze the key amendments related to libraries. The centrepiece for libraries of the new legislation are provisions that enable digitization for socially beneficial purposes, such as education and preservation of cultural heritage. The new law also implements two important European Union Directives, the Directive on orphan works and the Directive on public lending right. The Polish copyright reform process, which began in 2012, was characterized by its transparency and multi-stakeholder engagement. The library community participated for the first time in high-level policy discussions on copyright, and librarians became recognized as important stakeholders in a national reform process. While it is early days to assess the impact of the new legislation, and some practical processes have yet to be put in place, the library community is working hard to raise awareness and train librarians on what the changes will mean for library activities and services in Poland. We hope that this document serves as a useful analysis for librarians and policy-makers involved in copyright law reform around the world. Copyright reform in Poland EIFL provided assistance from 2012-2016 to ‘Copyright reform in Poland’, a project to support libraries and the national copyright reform process.
    [Show full text]