DOCSLIB.ORG

SUPPORTING REPORT E Fauna

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SUPPORTING REPORT E Fauna Southern EL 3251 Fauna Survey Client: Heathgate Resources Pty Ltd May 2006 Environmental and Biodiversity Services Table of Contents Acknowledgements .................................................................................................1 Executive Summary.................................................................................................2 1. Introduction .........................................................................................................3 1.1 Site description ...................................................................................3 1.2 Climate ...............................................................................................4 1.3 Land use.............................................................................................4 2. Methodology.....................................................................................................7 2.1 Background research..........................................................................7 2.2 Field survey ........................................................................................7 2.3 Trapping sites .....................................................................................7 2.4 Pitfall traps..........................................................................................7 2.5 Elliott traps..........................................................................................7 2.6 Cage traps ..........................................................................................8 2.7 Active searching..................................................................................8 2.8 Bird survey..........................................................................................8 2.9 Spotlighting.........................................................................................8 2.10 Anabat bat detector.............................................................................8 2.11 Harp traps...........................................................................................9 2.12 Opportunistic observations..................................................................9 2.13 Weather conditions .............................................................................9 3. Fauna habitats within the project site...........................................................10 3.1 Sclerolaena spp. Herbland on high and low gibber plains .................10 3.2 Eucalyptus camaldulensis Very Open Woodland ..............................11 3.3 Eremophila spp. / Acacia spp. / Santalum lanceolatum Tall Shrubland . .........................................................................................................11 3.4 Acacia victoriae Tall Shrubland over chenopods...............................11 4. Survey results ................................................................................................12 4.1 Mammals ..........................................................................................12 4.2 Reptiles and amphibians...................................................................13 4.3 Birds .................................................................................................14 4.4 Comparison between survey sites and habitats ................................14 4.5 Comparison with previous fauna records ..........................................15 5. Discussion ......................................................................................................16 5.1 General discussion ...........................................................................16 5.2 Birds .................................................................................................17 5.3 Mammals ..........................................................................................17 5.4 Reptiles and amphibians...................................................................18 6. Recommendations .........................................................................................20 References .........................................................................................................21 Southern EL 3251Fauna Survey Environmental and Biodiversity Services Appendix 1 M Trapping sites for the Beverley Fauna Survey ....................................22 Appendix 2 M Trapping effort for the Beverley Fauna Survey ...................................23 Appendix 3 M Mammal species recorded during the Beverley Fauna Survey ...........24 Appendix 4 M Reptile species recorded during the Beverley Fauna Survey..............25 Appendix 5 M Bird species recorded during the Beverley Fauna Survey...................26 Appendix 6 M Fauna species previously recorded within or in the vicinity of the project area ..................................................................................................28 Appendix 7 - General site photographs ....................................................................32 Southern EL 3251Fauna Survey Environmental and Biodiversity Services Acknowledgements The survey team comprised of the following people: Dr Travis How (Environmental and Biodiversity Services) M Survey Co- ordinator Dr Leanne Pound (Environmental and Biodiversity Services) M Field Assistant Gavin Baird (Environmental and Biodiversity Services) M Field Assistant Loraine Jansen (Sub-consultant) M Mammals Graham Carpenter (Sub-consultant) M Birds John Morley (Volunteer) We would like to thank the following people for their assistance and for information provided during the project: Mal Wedd (Environment Manager, Exploration & Development Group M Heathgate Resources Pty Ltd) Sue Carter (Senior Environmental Officer, Heathgate Resources Pty Ltd) Sally Modystach (Project Co-ordinator M URS Australia Pty Ltd) Frank Badman (Badman Environmental M Vegetation) Mark Hutchinson (Reptiles M South Australian Museum) Lynne Kajar (Field Equipment M Department for Environment and Heritage) Matt McDowell (Biological Survey Co-ordinator M South Australian Museum) Terry Reardon (Bats M South Australian Museum) Carolyn Secombe (Reptiles M South Australian Museum) David Stemmer (Mammals M South Australian Museum) Cath Kemper (Mammals M South Australian Museum) Southern EL 3251Fauna Survey 1 Environmental and Biodiversity Services Executive Summary A fauna survey was conducted in the southern half of the Exploration Lease 3251 (an area surrounding the existing Beverley Uranium Mine), north east of Arkaroola, South Australia in March 2006. A total of nine sites representing four different habitat types were surveyed for fauna species following a standard biological survey methodology developed by the Department for Environment and Heritage (Owens 2000). The dominant habitat types within the project area were: Sclerolaena spp. Herbland on high and low gibber plains (would be a Mitchell Grass (Astrebla pectinata) plain in better years) Eucalyptus camaldulensis Very Open Woodland Eremophila spp. / Acacia spp. / Santalum lanceolatum Tall Shrubland Acacia victoriae Tall Shrubland over chenopods Major findings of the survey were: Mammals - A total of 147 observations of 20 mammal species were made, of which only four are considered to be introduced. Reptiles - A total of 84 observations of 24 reptile species were made, all of which were native species. No amphibian species were observed however little suitable habitat was observed within the project area. Birds - A total of 892 observations of 48 bird species were made, with only one of these an introduced species. No species of conservation significance were observed during the survey. However, one notable capture was a Pseudomys hermannsburgensis (Sandy Inland Mouse). This record (voucher specimen lodged with the South Australian Museum) is a range extension for this species of over 80km. Gunninah Environmental Consultants completed a fauna survey at the Beverley Mine site as part of the Environmental Impact Statement in 1998. A total of six sites were implemented and the survey was undertaken over a six night period. A similar list of fauna species was recorded compared to the current survey. The Gunninah 1998 survey recorded four reptile species, four mammal species and 20 bird species which were not recorded in the current survey. The current survey recorded three reptile species, two mammal species and ten bird species which were not recorded in the Gunninah 1998 survey. None of the additional species recorded by Gunninah in 1998 were of conservation significance. The annual fauna monitoring at the Beverley Mine site, which re-surveys the trapping site put in by Gunninah Environmental Consultants, has recorded an additional two bird species and three reptile species which were not recorded by Gunninah or during the current fauna survey. None of the additional species are considered to be of conservation significance. It is recommended that mining operation in the area be planned and undertaken such that the impact on the biological environment, including habitat for fauna species, is minimised. An appropriate monitoring program should be incorporated in the Mining and Rehabilitation Program. Southern EL 3251Fauna Survey 2 Environmental and Biodiversity Services 1. Introduction This report documents a fauna survey undertaken in the southern half of the Exploration Lease 3251 in an adjacent to the existing Beverley Uranium Mine. The existing project site is approximately 600 km north of Adelaide and 30 km north east of Arkaroola. The field
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lake Pinaroo Ramsar Site
    Ecological character description: Lake Pinaroo Ramsar site Ecological character description: Lake Pinaroo Ramsar site Disclaimer The Department of Environment and Climate Change NSW (DECC) has compiled the Ecological character description: Lake Pinaroo Ramsar site in good faith, exercising all due care and attention. DECC does not accept responsibility for any inaccurate or incomplete information supplied by third parties. No representation is made about the accuracy, completeness or suitability of the information in this publication for any particular purpose. Readers should seek appropriate advice about the suitability of the information to their needs. © State of New South Wales and Department of Environment and Climate Change DECC is pleased to allow the reproduction of material from this publication on the condition that the source, publisher and authorship are appropriately acknowledged. Published by: Department of Environment and Climate Change NSW 59–61 Goulburn Street, Sydney PO Box A290, Sydney South 1232 Phone: 131555 (NSW only – publications and information requests) (02) 9995 5000 (switchboard) Fax: (02) 9995 5999 TTY: (02) 9211 4723 Email: [email protected] Website: www.environment.nsw.gov.au DECC 2008/275 ISBN 978 1 74122 839 7 June 2008 Printed on environmentally sustainable paper Cover photos Inset upper: Lake Pinaroo in flood, 1976 (DECC) Aerial: Lake Pinaroo in flood, March 1976 (DECC) Inset lower left: Blue-billed duck (R. Kingsford) Inset lower middle: Red-necked avocet (C. Herbert) Inset lower right: Red-capped plover (C. Herbert) Summary An ecological character description has been defined as ‘the combination of the ecosystem components, processes, benefits and services that characterise a wetland at a given point in time’.
    [Show full text]
  • Kowari Monitoring in Sturts Stony Desert 2008
    Kowari Dasycercus byrnei Distribution Monitoring in Sturts Stony Desert, South Australia, Spring 2007 Peter Canty & Robert Brandle – Science & Conservation, SA Dept Environment & Heritage, 2008 For SA Arid Lands Natural Resources Management Board i Contents Page Summary iii List of Figures, Photos and Tables iv Acknowledgments vi Project Aims 1 Methods 1 Results 8 Discussion 12 Conclusions 14 Recommendations 15 Bibliography 16 Appendices 17 1. The Kowari Habitat Assessment Datasheet 18 2. Satellite Images of Trapsites 19 3. Key Healthy Sand Mound Indicators 25 4. Other Mammal Species Likely to be Confused with Kowaris 43 5. Kowari Survey – Clifton Hills and Pandie Pandie Station December 2007 (Pedler & Read) 47 ii Summary: This paper reports on a presence/absence population status and distribution survey primarily for the Kowari (Dasycercus byrnei) in areas of known or likely habitat in Sturts Stony Desert, north-eastern South Australia. The survey was carried out between 27th August to 11th September 2007 on Mulka, Cowarie, Pandie Pandie, Innamincka and Cordillo Downs pastoral leases. The Kowari’s major habitat areas on Clifton Hills Pastoral Lease were not sampled as access was not approved by the property manager. Monitoring traplines followed typical Kowari survey standards with aluminium box/treadle traps (Elliott Type A) placed 100 metres apart on 10 kilometre long transects sampling ideal habitat over two trap-nights. The only variation from this standard was the pairing of traps at each station, one having bait specifically for Kowaris and other carnivorous species, the other baited for general sampling. Trapping was carried out at 6 locations over 12 nights with an approximate intensity of 400 trap-nights per sample.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Animal Keepers Species List
    Revised NSW Native Animal Keepers’ Species List Draft © 2017 State of NSW and Office of Environment and Heritage With the exception of photographs, the State of NSW and Office of Environment and Heritage are pleased to allow this material to be reproduced in whole or in part for educational and non-commercial use, provided the meaning is unchanged and its source, publisher and authorship are acknowledged. Specific permission is required for the reproduction of photographs. The Office of Environment and Heritage (OEH) has compiled this report in good faith, exercising all due care and attention. No representation is made about the accuracy, completeness or suitability of the information in this publication for any particular purpose. OEH shall not be liable for any damage which may occur to any person or organisation taking action or not on the basis of this publication. Readers should seek appropriate advice when applying the information to their specific needs. All content in this publication is owned by OEH and is protected by Crown Copyright, unless credited otherwise. It is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0), subject to the exemptions contained in the licence. The legal code for the licence is available at Creative Commons. OEH asserts the right to be attributed as author of the original material in the following manner: © State of New South Wales and Office of Environment and Heritage 2017. Published by: Office of Environment and Heritage 59 Goulburn Street, Sydney NSW 2000 PO Box A290,
    [Show full text]
  • Witchelina Expedition II – Biological Survey 2016 Data Report for The
    Witchelina Expedition II – Biological Survey 2016 Data Report for the Nature Foundation Darren Niejalke Expedition Science Coordinator Scientific Expedition Group on behalf of the Nature Foundation of South Australia Mon 12th– Friday 23rd September 2016 Biological Survey of SA Survey No. – 1028 Site Survey Code prefix – WIT Report Date JULY 2018 1 Table of Contents Contents 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................................. 3 1.2 Objectives................................................................................................................................ 3 1.3 Scope of this report ................................................................................................................. 3 2 Method ........................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 BSSA Survey Sites ................................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Fauna Survey ........................................................................................................................... 4 2.3 Flora Condition (Jessup) survey .............................................................................................. 5 3 Results and Discussion ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Predictive Framework and Review of the Ecological Impacts of Exotic Plant Invasions on Reptiles and Amphibians
    A predictive framework and review of the ecological impacts of exotic plant invasions on reptiles and amphibians Leigh J. Martin* and Brad R. Murray Plant Functional Biology and Climate Change Cluster, Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, NSW 2007, Australia *Author for correspondence (Tel: + 61 2 9514 8346; Fax: + 61 2 9514 4079; E-mail: [email protected]). 2 ABSTRACT The invasive spread of exotic plants in native vegetation can pose serious threats to native faunal assemblages. This is of particular concern for reptiles and amphibians because they form a significant component of the world’s vertebrate fauna, play a pivotal role in ecosystem functioning and are often neglected in biodiversity research. A framework to predict how exotic plant invasion will affect reptile and amphibian assemblages is imperative for conservation, management and the identification of research priorities. Here, we present a new predictive framework that integrates three mechanistic models. These models are based on exotic plant invasion altering: (1) habitat structure; (2) herbivory and predator-prey interactions; (3) the reproductive success of reptile and amphibian species and assemblages. We present a series of testable predictions from these models that arise from the interplay over time among three exotic plant traits (growth form, area of coverage, taxonomic distinctiveness) and six traits of reptiles and amphibians (body size, lifespan, home range size, habitat specialisation, diet, reproductive strategy). A literature review provided robust empirical evidence of exotic plant impacts on reptiles and amphibians from each of the three model mechanisms. Evidence relating to the role of body size and diet was less clear-cut, indicating the need for further research.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue of Protozoan Parasites Recorded in Australia Peter J. O
    1 CATALOGUE OF PROTOZOAN PARASITES RECORDED IN AUSTRALIA PETER J. O’DONOGHUE & ROBERT D. ADLARD O’Donoghue, P.J. & Adlard, R.D. 2000 02 29: Catalogue of protozoan parasites recorded in Australia. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 45(1):1-164. Brisbane. ISSN 0079-8835. Published reports of protozoan species from Australian animals have been compiled into a host- parasite checklist, a parasite-host checklist and a cross-referenced bibliography. Protozoa listed include parasites, commensals and symbionts but free-living species have been excluded. Over 590 protozoan species are listed including amoebae, flagellates, ciliates and ‘sporozoa’ (the latter comprising apicomplexans, microsporans, myxozoans, haplosporidians and paramyxeans). Organisms are recorded in association with some 520 hosts including mammals, marsupials, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fish and invertebrates. Information has been abstracted from over 1,270 scientific publications predating 1999 and all records include taxonomic authorities, synonyms, common names, sites of infection within hosts and geographic locations. Protozoa, parasite checklist, host checklist, bibliography, Australia. Peter J. O’Donoghue, Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia 4072, Australia; Robert D. Adlard, Protozoa Section, Queensland Museum, PO Box 3300, South Brisbane 4101, Australia; 31 January 2000. CONTENTS the literature for reports relevant to contemporary studies. Such problems could be avoided if all previous HOST-PARASITE CHECKLIST 5 records were consolidated into a single database. Most Mammals 5 researchers currently avail themselves of various Reptiles 21 electronic database and abstracting services but none Amphibians 26 include literature published earlier than 1985 and not all Birds 34 journal titles are covered in their databases. Fish 44 Invertebrates 54 Several catalogues of parasites in Australian PARASITE-HOST CHECKLIST 63 hosts have previously been published.
    [Show full text]
  • South West Queensland QLD Page 1 of 89 21-Jan-11 Species List for NRM Region South West Queensland, Queensland
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • (Marcr) 2010 - 2011
    Cairn Hill Magnetite-Copper-Gold Project Mining and Rehabilitation Compliance Report (MARCR) 2010 - 2011 26 July 2011 Reference No. Cairn Hill ML 6303 MARCR 2010-2011 Rev1 Document / Project Summary Information Mine Owner Termite Resources NL Mine Operator Termite Resources NL Primary Contact Person Simon Parsons, General Manager – Cairn Hill Contact Details Level 2, 16 Vardon Avenue, Adelaide 5000 Tel: +61 8 8227 0277 Fax: +61 8 8232 6740 Email: [email protected] Name of Mining Operation Cairn Hill Commodity Mined Magnetite-Copper-Gold Document Title Cairn Hill Magnetite – Copper – Gold Mining Project Mining and Rehabilitation Compliance Report (MARCR) 2010 – 2011 ML Granted 17 April 2008 ML Number ML 6303 Recipient: Mr Hans Bailiht – Principal Mining Regulator (Metallic & Uranium), Inspector of Mines Mining Regulation & Rehabilitation Branch Primary Industries and Resources South Australia GPO Box 1671 ADELAIDE SA 5001 Author: A Woidt – Termite Resources NL Reviewer: S Staines – Termite Resources NL Approved by: S Parsons – Termite Resources NL Date: 26 July 2011 Distribution: PIRSA (3 hard copies, 1 electronic copy), Termite Resources NL (2 hard copies, 1 electronic copy), IMX Resources (1 hard copy, 1 electronic copy) Cairn Hill ML 6303 MARCR 2010-2011 Rev1 i Contents 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 General ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Phylogeny and Revised Classification of Squamata, Including 4161 Species of Lizards and Snakes
    BMC Evolutionary Biology This Provisional PDF corresponds to the article as it appeared upon acceptance. Fully formatted PDF and full text (HTML) versions will be made available soon. A phylogeny and revised classification of Squamata, including 4161 species of lizards and snakes BMC Evolutionary Biology 2013, 13:93 doi:10.1186/1471-2148-13-93 Robert Alexander Pyron ([email protected]) Frank T Burbrink ([email protected]) John J Wiens ([email protected]) ISSN 1471-2148 Article type Research article Submission date 30 January 2013 Acceptance date 19 March 2013 Publication date 29 April 2013 Article URL http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/13/93 Like all articles in BMC journals, this peer-reviewed article can be downloaded, printed and distributed freely for any purposes (see copyright notice below). Articles in BMC journals are listed in PubMed and archived at PubMed Central. For information about publishing your research in BMC journals or any BioMed Central journal, go to http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/authors/ © 2013 Pyron et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. A phylogeny and revised classification of Squamata, including 4161 species of lizards and snakes Robert Alexander Pyron 1* * Corresponding author Email: [email protected] Frank T Burbrink 2,3 Email: [email protected] John J Wiens 4 Email: [email protected] 1 Department of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University, 2023 G St.
    [Show full text]
  • Main Roads Western Australia Great Northern Highway SLK 568 Pit Expansion Biological Survey
    Main Roads Western Australia Great Northern Highway SLK 568 Pit Expansion Biological Survey November 2010 This Great Northern Highway SLK 568 Pit Expansion Biological Survey (“Report”): 1. has been prepared by GHD Pty Ltd (“GHD”) for Main Roads Western Australia (MRWA); 2. may only be used and relied on by MRWA; 3. must not be copied to, used by, or relied on by any person other than [insert name of client] without the prior written consent of GHD; 4. may only be used for the purpose of clearing permit application (and must not be used for any other purpose). GHD and its servants, employees and officers otherwise expressly disclaim responsibility to any person other than MRWA arising from or in connection with this Report. To the maximum extent permitted by law, all implied warranties and conditions in relation to the services provided by GHD and the Report are excluded unless they are expressly stated to apply in this Report. The services undertaken by GHD in connection with preparing this Report: x were limited to those specifically detailed in section 7 of this Report; x did not include a Level 2 fauna survey. The opinions, conclusions and any recommendations in this Report are based on assumptions made by GHD when undertaking services and preparing the Report (“Assumptions”), including (but not limited to): x All data supplied by government agencies and regulators is correct at time of search. GHD expressly disclaims responsibility for any error in, or omission from, this Report arising from or in connection with any of the Assumptions being incorrect.
    [Show full text]
  • A LIST of the VERTEBRATES of SOUTH AUSTRALIA
    A LIST of the VERTEBRATES of SOUTH AUSTRALIA updates. for Edition 4th Editors See A.C. Robinson K.D. Casperson Biological Survey and Research Heritage and Biodiversity Division Department for Environment and Heritage, South Australia M.N. Hutchinson South Australian Museum Department of Transport, Urban Planning and the Arts, South Australia 2000 i EDITORS A.C. Robinson & K.D. Casperson, Biological Survey and Research, Biological Survey and Research, Heritage and Biodiversity Division, Department for Environment and Heritage. G.P.O. Box 1047, Adelaide, SA, 5001 M.N. Hutchinson, Curator of Reptiles and Amphibians South Australian Museum, Department of Transport, Urban Planning and the Arts. GPO Box 234, Adelaide, SA 5001updates. for CARTOGRAPHY AND DESIGN Biological Survey & Research, Heritage and Biodiversity Division, Department for Environment and Heritage Edition Department for Environment and Heritage 2000 4thISBN 0 7308 5890 1 First Edition (edited by H.J. Aslin) published 1985 Second Edition (edited by C.H.S. Watts) published 1990 Third Edition (edited bySee A.C. Robinson, M.N. Hutchinson, and K.D. Casperson) published 2000 Cover Photograph: Clockwise:- Western Pygmy Possum, Cercartetus concinnus (Photo A. Robinson), Smooth Knob-tailed Gecko, Nephrurus levis (Photo A. Robinson), Painted Frog, Neobatrachus pictus (Photo A. Robinson), Desert Goby, Chlamydogobius eremius (Photo N. Armstrong),Osprey, Pandion haliaetus (Photo A. Robinson) ii _______________________________________________________________________________________ CONTENTS
    [Show full text]
  • A Biological Survey of Mount Willoughby Indigenous Protected Area
    21941.05 - Willoughby Cover 17/5/05 1:40 PM Page 1 A Biological Survey of Mount Willoughby Indigenous Protected Area South Australia www.environment.sa.gov.au A BIOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THE MT WILLOUGHBY INDIGENOUS PROTECTED AREA, SOUTH AUSTRALIA OCTOBER 2003 by R. Brandle, B. Sparrow, J. N. Foulkes and A. C. Robinson Biological Survey and Monitoring Section Science and Conservation Directorate Department for Environment and Heritage South Australia 2005 i Mt Willoughby I. P. A. Biological Survey The Biological Survey of the Mt Willoughby I. P. A. South Australia was carried out as a consultancy to the Tjirilia Foundation with funds from the Indigenous Protected Areas Fund of the Commonwealth of Australia The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Environment Australia or the State Government of South Australia. The report may be cited as: R. Brandle, B. Sparrow, J. N. Foulkes and A. C. Robinson (2005). A Biological Survey of the Mt Willoughby Indigenous Protected Area, South Australia - October 2003. (Department for Environment and Heritage, South Australia). Limited hard copies of the report were prepared, but it can also be accessed from the Internet on: http://www.environment.sa.gov.au/biodiversity/biosurveys AUTHORS R. Brandle, B. Sparrow, J. N. Foulkes and A. C. Robinson, Biological Survey and Monitoring, Science and Conservation Directorate, Department for Environment and Heritage. PO Box 1047 Adelaide 5001 CARTOGRAPHY AND DESIGN Science and Conservation Directorate, Department for Environment and Heritage. © Department for Environment and Heritage 2005 Cover Photograph View SW across breakaway hills from above survey site BRU00501 on the Mt Willoughby I.
    [Show full text]