NCSL Executive Committee Minutes of Winter Meeting Salt Lake City, Utah Jan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NCSL Executive Committee Minutes of Winter Meeting Salt Lake City, Utah Jan NCSL Executive Committee Minutes of Winter Meeting Salt Lake City, Utah Jan. 9, 2016 President Curt Bramble called the meeting to order. The following officers and members were present: Officers Senator Curt Bramble, Utah, President Senator Mike Gronstal, Iowa, President-Elect Karl Aro, Maryland, Staff Chair Raul Burciaga, New Mexico, Staff Vice Chair Peggy Piety, Indiana, Immediate Past Staff Chair Executive Committee Members Senator Pamela Althoff, Illinois Stephanie Barrett, Vermont Senator Randi Becker, Washington Wayne Kidd, Utah Martha Carter, Nebraska Representative Greg Leding, Arkansas Lore Christopher, Oregon Debra Levine, New York Senator Bill Cowsert, Georgia Ken Levine, Texas Randy Dowell, Oklahoma Senator Karen McConnaughay, Illinois Representative Dan Flynn, Texas Representative Jeff Morris, Washington Sarah Freeman, Indiana Francois Ouimet, MNA, Quebec Sonia Gavin, Montana Representative Joyce Peppin, Minnesota Senator Kemp Hannon, New York Representative Scott Saiki, Hawaii Senator Wayne Harper, Utah Jim Smith, North Dakota John Heining, Texas Representative Greg Snowden, Mississippi Senator Sara Howard, Nebraska Chuck Truesdell, Kentucky Russell Humphrey, Tennessee Martha Wigton, Georgia Senator Neville James, U.S. Virgin Islands Representative Art Wittich, Montana Wendy Jackson, Wisconsin Speaker Robin Vos, Wisconsin Representative Jay Kaufman, Massachusetts Jan Yamane, Hawaii Representative Helene Keeley, Delaware Senator Delores Kelley, Maryland Representative Brian Kennedy, Rhode Island A quorum was present with 42 members in attendance. Several guests and NCSL staff also were present. APPROVAL OF MINUTES NCSL President Curt Bramble called for a motion to approve the minutes from the NCSL Executive Committee meeting held in Nashville, Tenn., on Oct. 17. The Executive Committee unanimously approved the minutes from the fall meeting. 1 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR’S REPORT NCSL Executive Director William Pound called the members’ attention to the NCSL Public Affairs report, noting that it shows an increasingly vigorous public affairs effort. Pound remarked that NCSL Director of Public Affairs Mick Bullock has done an excellent job. Bullock joined NCSL a little more than a year ago and has done a terrific job in developing and enhancing the visibility of NCSL in the media. Pound thanked Christine Csizmadia with the Nuclear Energy Institute for securing the support by Nuclear Energy Matters for the Friday evening opening reception. Pound also recognized the State Government Affairs Council for its continuing support of the Thursday evening welcome reception. Pound reported that NCSL has been working on a demographic study of state legislatures over the past year. The study was conducted by former NCSL Director Karl Kurtz and constitutes the most complete examination of state legislatures and their membership that has been conducted in recent years. Pound explained that a presentation of the results of the study took place at the NCSL Capitol Forum held in Washington, D.C., in December, and that a summary of the findings would be presented to the Executive Committee. The full presentation can be found online at http://www.ncsl.org/Portals/1/Documents/public/execlscc/Demographics_011516.pdf. STATE LEGISLATIVE DEMOGRAPHICS PRESENTATION Kurtz began his presentation by noting that he is a white male Protestant, a member of the silent generation, and that he holds a graduate degree. Kurtz explained that he chose to introduce himself in that fashion because it illustrates the focus of the study: an examination of six demographic characteristics of state legislators. The study looks at something which political scientists refer to as descriptive representation. The study asks: To what extent do our 7,383 state legislators look like the rest of America? The data illustrated that while legislatures are more diverse than they have ever been in the past, they are not as diverse as the general public. Kurtz prefaced his presentation by explaining how NCSL obtained the data for the study. The data used in the study was self-reported by legislators. NCSL contracts with KnowWho, a company that supplies the information used to maintain NCSL legislative directories that are used by NCSL staff for official purposes. KnowWho uses an automated method of scraping websites. Therefore, if a legislator says that he or she was born in 1960, KnowWho would capture that. Beginning with self-reported data as a base, NCSL then conducted independent research, contacting clerks, secretaries and other staff in the legislature to obtain information. Finally, NCSL staff conducted independent online research to fill in remaining gaps in the data. Kurtz told the committee that while he would be reporting exclusively on national data, the NCSL website provides an interactive map that offers information specific to individual states and provides a comparison of individual state legislatures to the population of each respective state. Data can be found online here: http://www.ncsl.org/research/about-state-legislatures/who-we-elect-an-interactive-graphic.aspx. Kurtz reported that there has been a very significant increase in the representation of women and minorities dating back to 1971. There are six times as many women legislators today as there were in 1971, but that was also true in 2009. In other words, gains in representation have leveled off for women. The same is true of African Americans. The largest growth in African-American representation occurred 2 beginning in the 1970s and since 2009 has mostly leveled off. The number of Hispanic legislators continues to rise, as is reflected in the data from before the 2015 elections. When comparing women and minorities to the population as a whole, women constitute 24 percent of state legislators, but they’re 51 percent of the population. Blacks make up 9 percent of state legislators and of Congress, which is fairly close to their 13 percent share of the general population. While Hispanics are growing in number in state legislatures, they’re still only at 5 percent compared to their 17 percent share of the general population. Geographically, women hold the largest number of state legislative seats in the West and in the Northeast. In terms of partisan affiliation, 34 percent of the Democratic legislators in the country are women and 17 percent of Republicans are women. Women make up majorities among the Democratic legislators in four states: Colorado, Idaho, Montana and Utah. Of course in three of those four states - Idaho, Montana and Utah – those women are part of a very distinct minority party status as Democrats, so they are relatively small caucuses. Kurtz said data shows minority legislators are very much concentrated in the coastal and border states. Minorities make up one-third of Democratic legislators across the country and 5 percent of Republican legislators. The majority of the Democrats in nine states in the South, mostly the Deep South, are African American. Minorities also make up the majority of the Democrats in California, Arizona and Nevada. Kurtz reported that there is a broad age range among state legislators; the youngest state legislator in the country currently is 19 years old and the oldest is 94 years of age. The average among all state legislators is 56. There is not huge variation from state to state with respect to age, but New Hampshire’s legislature is easily the oldest with an average of 66 years of age. There were no significant partisan differences between Democrats and Republicans in terms of the age of members. However, Kurtz reported, the data do reflect significant differences in age in term-limited legislatures. On average, legislators in term-limited states were three years younger than legislators in non-term-limited states. This is not surprising, as there are fewer senior members by definition in term- limited legislatures. Kurtz reasoned that if there are fewer senior members, members will be relatively younger. Kurtz further explained that a decrease in the average age of members is the only impact on the makeup of legislatures that can be attributed to term limits. When arguments were made in favor of term limits in the early 1990s, some of the key arguments centered upon an anticipated increase in representation of women and minorities. That has not been the case, Kurtz reported, stating that there are no significant differences between term-limited and non-term-limited states in terms of the numbers of minority or women members. Generationally, the U.S. adult population is pretty much equally divided among millennials, genxers and baby boomers. In state legislatures, however, baby boomers significantly predominate. Millennials are underrepresented relative to their share of the population. Over time, however, the number of millennial legislators is growing as members of that generation age. In 2009, millennials made up only 1 percent of the members of state legislatures; by 2015 they made up 5 percent. 3 Kurtz told the committee state legislators are much better educated than the general public. Democrats and Republicans are equally matched in terms of members who have a bachelor’s degree, but Democrats have a higher proportion of members with advanced degrees. There are only a very small portion of legislators who have less than a bachelor’s degree. It may be that legislators without a college education are substantially under-counted. In collecting data, NCSL was unable to obtain information about education for 23 percent of state legislators. Congress has a substantially higher proportion of members with advanced degrees than state legislatures. Thirty nine percent of congressional members are attorneys by profession, compared to only 17 percent of state legislators. Kurtz said the order in which he addressed each area of demographics during the presentation reflects the order in which the data are most concrete. Data on age, for example, are much softer than that on gender, race or ethnicity. The numbers are especially nebulous for religious affiliation. Protestants and Catholic legislators predominate: 56 percent of state legislators are either Protestant, Catholic or identify as members of other Christian denominations.
Recommended publications
  • 2021 Legislative Wrap up Document
    UTAH LEAGUE OF CITIES AND TOWNS LEGISLATIVE2021 WRAP UP #Cities Work INTRODUCTION 2021 was a legislative session like no other: new Governor, new legislators, COVID-19, Zoom voting, and an earlier start date after several 2020 special sessions. ULCT successfully nav- igated the 2021 General Session by relying on the League’s pillars: respecting the roles of state and local government, collaborating with stake- holders, and targeting policy-focused outcomes. ULCT took a hands-on approach with over 60 bills—testifying, negoti- ating, writing language, 245 and other advocacy BILLS TRACKED work—in addition to the INTRODUCTION 245 bills we tracked. Despite many bills preempt- ing local government authority, ULCT effectively defeated legislation mandating digital billboards, expanding short-term rentals, and increasing bureaucracy around fees, to name a few. ULCT invested significant resources negotiating and amending two preemptive land use bills, and will continue discussions with legislators on inspec- tions, building design elements, and internal ac- cessory dwelling units. Several bills supporting and improving law enforcement were passed due to the efforts of the Love, Listen, Lead Task Force, a joint ULCT and Utah Chiefs of Police Association endeavor. The Legislature also passed an unprec- edented investment in transit and transportation projects, efforts supported by the ULCT Board. Ultimately, our success comes back to the unpar- alleled involvement by our members. Thank you! Of course, the session also created plenty of is- sues for the 2021 interim, including continuing discussions on water, land use, public safety, and much more. We encourage members to engage with the League through the Legislative Policy Committee, ULCT conferences, and League com- munications.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Policy Committee
    Legislative Policy Committee December 14, 2020 Agenda 1. Legislative logistics 2. Housing 3. Public safety 4. Fees 5. Other legislation 6. Outreach 7. Homework 8. Recognition of Governor Herbert Legislative Outlook Unprecedented 2021 session! VALUE PILLARS Policy Tiers Green: update to tier Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Water conservation Land Use Task Force: Land Use Task Force: Rainy day funds -PID -Annexation/incorporation Housing: -Annexation/incorporation -Low impact development Gun preemption -Building fees -Gravel pits -Development agreements -Impact fees -Low impact development -Water provider review of plat State homeless coordinator/plan -ADU -Development agreements -Building permits/vesting -Permitting & inspection authority -Water provider review of plat -Impact fees Anonymous code complaints -HRZ, other affordable housing tools -Building permits/vesting -Boundary line adjustment -Impact fees -Land use training Eminent domain Trust in public safety: -Boundary line adjustment -Officer discipline process -Land use training Convention and tourism Enterprise funds -Training assessment -Data collection Transportation/Air quality Emergency authority ULCT will engage on bills that impact trust & ULCT prism GIA and notice of claim Rainy day funds Marijuana, tobacco (land use, licensing) Municipal fees and taxes (in general) State homeless coordinator/plan Gun preemption Economic development/incentives Fireworks Metro Townships JRI investment CRA/RDA (Sen. Harper) Public safety individual privacy EMS Legal notice/print news Transportation utility
    [Show full text]
  • WFRC Budget Committee May 3, 2021 AGENDA
    41 N. Rio Grande Street, Suite 103 Salt Lake City, UT 84101 (801) 363-4250 www.wfrc.org Jeff Silvestrini, Chair Mayor, Millcreek Jeff Scott, Vice Chair Commissioner, Box Elder County WFRC Budget Committee Mark Allen May 3, 2021 Mayor, Washington Terrace Len Arave Mayor, North Salt Lake Ron Bigelow Mayor, West Valley AGENDA Mike Caldwell There will be a meeting of the Budget Committee on Tuesday, May 3, 2021 Mayor, Ogden at 2:00pm via Zoom Meeting Robert Dahle https://us02web.zoom.us/j/81123176628?pwd=RXVUSGZPQlZIZVNGbWN4YzJ Mayor, Holladay Jim Harvey OTk54UT09 Meeting ID: 811 2317 6628 Passcode: 419043 Commissioner, Weber County One tap mobile +12532158782,,81123176628# Scott Jenkins Commissioner, Weber County The agenda for the meeting will be as follows: Randy Lewis Mayor, Bountiful 1. Welcome and Introductions Erin Mendenhall ACTION: Approve Minutes from WFRC Budget meeting held March 11, 2021 Mayor, Salt Lake City ACTION: Financial statements/check registers for February and March 2021, Mike Newton and Budget/expenditure report to date Councilmember, Morgan County Mark Shepherd 2. ACTION: Recommend approval of WFRC’s FY22 budget, Unified Planning Mayor, Clearfield Work Program (UPWP) and Goals Bob Stevenson Commissioner, Davis County 3. ACTION: Approve Resolution to change signatures on the PTIF account Derk Timothy Mayor, Bluffdale 4. Fraud Risk Assessment FY21 Troy Walker Mayor, Draper Executive Director’s Report Scott Wardle 5. Councilmember, Tooele County Jenny Wilson 6. Other Business Mayor, Salt Lake County Next meeting (tentative): August 12, 2021 Aimee Winder-Newton Councilmember, Salt Lake County Senator Wayne Harper Utah State Senate Informational materials can be located on WFRC’s website at www.wfrc.org.
    [Show full text]
  • April 2017 Newsletter
    1 April 2017 Volume 42 Issue 4 THE UTAH TAXPAYER A Publication of the Utah Taxpayers Association If Congress Acts, What Will APRIL 2017 Volume 42 Federal Tax Reform Look Like? With Congress’s failure to repeal and replace the Affordable If Congress Acts, What Will Care Act, attention in Washington, D.C. appears to be turning Federal Tax Reform Look towards federal tax reform. This is a needed change as the Like? Page 1 United States has not seen any comprehensive tax reform since My Corner: Employed by 1986. The nation’s economy has evolved since the 1980’s and Page 2 Utah’s Tax Watchdog for 40 the tax code needs to be reformed to match the economic Years activity of today’s world. Page 2 Currently the federal tax code imposes high marginal rates on 2017 Legislative Session: A both businesses and individuals. According to the Washington, Page 4 D.C. based Tax Foundation, the United States has one of the Mixed Bag of Success, Tax Increases Page 5 highest corporate income tax rates in the world. Significant tax reform would be targeted at lowering those rates. The struggle 2017 Legislative Scorecard for the reform will be how to do it such that it best benefits the Released, 34 “Friend of the United States overall. Taxpayer” Awarded Page 7 The U.S. tax system is complex. The Tax Foundation has stated that individuals spent 8.9 billion hours complying with Utah’s Income Tax Rate the Internal Revenue Tax Code in 2016 and figures that the Ranks Second Highest total cost for tax compliance in 2016 was $409 billion.
    [Show full text]
  • House Senate Rating
    2010 Utah Legislature Rated How interest groups rated Utah lawmakers The "Red/Blue Index" standardizes and averages scores, so that the higher the number, the "redder" conservative a member is,and the lower the number, the "bluer" liberal. UTAH HOUSE MEMBERS Tribune Tribune Red/Blue Red/Blue Member Affiliation Index Member Affiliation Index Eric Hutchings R-Kearns 85.4 Jack Draxler R-N. Logan 65.0 Keith Grover R-Provo 84.8 Kay McIff R-Richfield 64.0 Stephen Sandstrom R-Orem 84.8 Ron Bigelow R-West Valley 62.2 Mike Morley R-Spanish Fk. 84.6 Doug Aagard R-Kaysville 62.0 Kenneth Sumsion R-Lehi 84.6 Melvin Brown R-Coalville 61.4 Craig Frank R-Pleasant Grove 84.6 Evan Vickers R-Cedar City 61.4 Merlynn Newbold R-S. Jordan 84.6 Johnny Anderson R-Taylorsville 61.2 Michael Noel R-Kanab 84.4 Todd Kiser R-Sandy 60.2 Brad Daw R-Orem 84.2 Jim Dunnigan R-Taylorsville 60.0 Christopher Herrod R-Provo 84.0 Ronda Menlove R-Garland 58.2 Wayne Harper R-West Jordan 82.0 Becky Edwards R-N. Salt Lake 55.0 Francis Gibson R-Mapleton 81.8 James Gowans D-Tooele 52.2 Rebecca Lockhart R-Provo 81.0 Steven Mascaro R-W. Jordan 51.6 Greg Hughes R-Draper 81.0 Neal Hendrickson D-West Valley 49.6 Ryan Wilcox R-Ogden 80.4 Jim Bird R-West Jordan 49.6 Carl Wimmer R-Herriman 80.2 Richard Greenwood R-Roy 48.2 John Dougall R-Am.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah DRAFT State Profile and Data Sheet
    8/03/2015 Utah DRAFT State Profile and Data Sheet Utah Demographic Information: Total Population: 2.94 million Growth Rate (since 2001): 1.2% Largest Populated Counties: Salt Lake 1,029,655 Utah 516,564 Davis 306,479 Weber 231,236 Square Miles: 82,169 College Degree (Bachelors or higher): 30.3% Economic Indicators: Total Civilian Labor Force: 1.4 million Current Unemployment: 3.8% State GDP (nominal): 141 billion (2014) Latest GDP Growth Estimate: 5.02% % of U.S. GDP: .84% GDP Per Capita: $48,580 Income Per Capita: $28,184 Utah CMAQ Funding: EPA Non-Attainment Counties: $ 10,750,409 Utah Political Landscape: State Governor: Gary Herbert (R) Committees of Note: Majority Leader—Senate: Ralph Okerlund (R) Natural Resources, Agriculture, Majority Leader—House: Jim Dunnigan (R) and Environment: Senate President: Wayne L. Niederhauser (R) Lee B. Perry (R), Chair H Scott K. Jenkins (R), Chair S House Speaker: Greg Hughes (R) Transportation: U.S. Senators: Johnny Anderson (R), Chair H Alvin B. Jackson (R), Chair S Orrin Hatch (R) Mike Lee (R) Natural Resources, Agriculture, U.S. Representatives by District: and Environmental Quality Rob Bishop (R) - 1st Jason Chaffetz (R) - 3rd Appropriations Subcommittee: Chris Stewart (R) - 2nd Mia Love (R) - 4th David P. Hinkins (R), S Utah Department of Transportation: Mike K. McKell (R), H Executive Director : Regional Directors: Carlos Braceras Kris Peterson Nathan Lee Teri Newell Rick Torgerson Deputy Director: (Northern Utah and (Central Utah) (Southern Wasatch (Central and Northern Wasatch Front) Front and Uintah Basin) Southern Utah) Shane Marshall Utah Legislative Landscape: Utah could have the first commercial oil sands mine in the 14 AFV Bills Proposed in 2015—5 bills enacted: United States by year’s end.
    [Show full text]
  • LPC Supplemental Materials
    LPC Supplemental Materials December 14, 2020 • Draft legislation: Single-Family Housing Modifications (Rep. Ward) • HB 374 Building Regulation Amendments: Municipal Plan Review and Building Inspection Times • State of the HBA update from Executive Officer Paul Ray • Deseret News: Utahns Trust City Over State Government in Planning for Growth, Group Says • Deseret News: Housing Affordability in Utah Entering Perilous Territory Study Says • Gardner Policy Institute: Housing Affordability: What Are Best Practices and Why Are They Important? • SB 163 White Paper- Community Reinvestment Agency Amendments (Sen. Harper) • Key legislative committee rosters, freshmen legislators, find your legislator • Utah Policy: Messages to new legislators from ULCT • Fees information: Mandator Fees in the State System of Higher Education (State Auditor) Rep. Ward will attend LPC and field questions from members about his internal ADU legislation. We have communicated to him that members have voiced concerns about restricting city standards for internal ADUs and changing the statutory definition of “single-family limit” (10-9a-505.5(1)) to remove the reference to “unrelated” individuals. If you have concerns about these or other parts of his bill, please come prepared to explain and provide specific examples where changing this authority or definition is detrimental to your city. Review Rep. Ward’s update draft here: https://www.ulct.org/Home/ShowDocument?id=2046 12/4/2020 HB 374 Building Regulation Amendments: Municipal Plan Review and Building Inspection Times In House Bill 374 (2020 GS 4th Sub. Rep. Ray) the Legislature asked municipalities to examine whether cities and towns met land use process deadlines—plan review and building inspections— in the face of unprecedented population growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Did You Know?
    You’ve heard about Proposition 2, but DID YOU KNOW? A Washington DC lobbying organization (Marijuana Policy Project) representing the marijuana industry (big growers and distributors), whose stated purpose is to legalize recreational marijuana, is the primary backer of Utah’s petition, spending millions to change laws in Utah and two other states in 2018. It’s about MONEY. CHILDREN • The only penalty for those who possess • Children and teens could obtain without a medical card is an infraction and 9 permission to use a very high potency a maximum $100 fine. THC marijuana.1 • Until July 2020, even without a medical • Utah law already allows children with marijuana card, a person claiming a intractable seizures to seek treatment by “qualifying condition” can use, possess or physicians using CBD oil2 or prescription manufacture marijuana products under the Epidiolex3 to help reduce seizures. initiative’s affirmative defense provision if they are charged.10 • The highest youth marijuana use in the country is in states that have legalized • Qualifying conditions are so broad (e.g., marijuana, even for medical purposes and chronic pain, nausea, autism) as to allow use is increasing.4 nearly anyone to qualify for a recommendation.11 LACK OF REGULATION NO Rx, NO PHARMACIES • Local city and county officials will be unable to prevent marijuana growing • No pharmacists and pharmacies - people warehouses or dispensaries from operating without medical training (“budtenders”) in your community except within 300 ft. will sell marijuana products (including of residential neighborhoods and 600 ft of THC) through marijuana dispensaries in 12 churches, schools and parks.5 your community.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Legislative Scorecard
    12 March 2016 Utah Taxpayers Association - 2016 Legislative Scorecard The Utah Taxpayers Association annually releases a legislative scorecard ranking Utah’s legislators by their votes on the most important tax-related bills considered during the most recent legislative session. Out of 81 bills the Utah Taxpayers Association tracked during the 2016 Legislature, 19 of the most important tax-related bills were used in rating Utah’s 104 legislators. In the House, seven bills supported by the Taxpayers Association received no dissenting votes, therefore, the lowest possible score for a Representative (unless there were absences) is 41%. In the Senate, twelve bills supported by the Taxpayers Association passed without a dissenting vote, meaning the lowest possible Senator score (unless there were absences) is 71%. Senate Summary House Summary The average score in the Senate is 91.4%, out of The average score in the House is 80%, out of the the 17 votes scored. Two Senators received a 17 votes scored. Six Representatives received a perfect 100% score: Lincoln Fillmore and Howard perfect 100% score: Dan McCay, Steve Eliason, Stephenson. The next highest scoring senators Justin Fawson, Sophia Dicaro, Fred Cox, and are Deidre Henderson, Wayne Harper, Al Kraig Powell. The Highest scoring Democrats are Jackson, Brian Shiozawa, Luz Escamilla, and Susan Duckworth and Mark Wheatley, scoring Karen Mayne (also the highest scoring 87.5%. Democrats) with 94.1%. No representative scored below 70.5%. The No senators scored below 80%. The lowest lowest scoring Republicans are Mel Brown, Jake Senate scores are associated with absences on Anderegg, Mike Noel, scoring 80%.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah Grassroots
    2018 Legislative Report GrassRoots Committed to Promoting the Principles of Limited Government, Constitution, Representative Government, Participatory Republic, Free Market Economy, Family, and Separation of Powers UtahGrassRoots.org Annual Report on Utah’s Legislature April 2018 Where have all the good bills gone? Roberts Tops House; Dayton Leads Senate Prospects for a tax cut were quickly dashed, despite having Marc Roberts received a perfect score on this year’s $382 million in ongoing revenues and one-time GrassRoots report. Rounding out the top 10% in the House increase of $102 million, the Utah Legislature chose were Brian Greene (R-UT), Ken Ivory (R-SL), Travis to continue the trend of raising taxes. If HJR 20 is Seegmiller (R-WA), Adam Robertson (R-UT), Norman passed Utah drivers will see a 33% increase in their Thurston (R-UT) and Kim Coleman (R-SL). gasoline tax. Another bill, HB 293, is projected to cause property tax revenue to the state increase by Senate Summary: Margaret Dayton (R-UT) received the $125 million by H.B. 293. top score in the Senate. Increased revenue will be spent on changing the name of Governor: Governor Herbert received a 21% compared Utah Transit Authority which lawmakers are hoping to his lifetime average of 41%. Herbert’s previous scores Utah’s citizens will forget the years of misuse of taxpayer were: 71% (2010); 73% (2011); 75% (2012); 28% (2013); dollars. While the bill has some good provisions as the old 29% (2014); 41% (2015), 24% (2016), 27% (2017). saying goes, “You can put lipstick on a pig but it’s still a pig.” Averages: The House received an average score of 46% which is equal to the Representatives lifetime score.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Utah Elections Update
    2016 Utah Elections Update Publication — 11/10/2016 Utah's Election: The results for many of the swing seats in Utah were greatly delayed by late return posting from Salt Lake County. The first statewide mail-in balloting did not go as smoothly as planned and the lack of Election Day Kate Bradshaw in-person polling locations resulted in long lines with voters still waiting to cast ballots in many Salt Lake County locations until after 11:00 pm. This Director of Government Affairs had a particular impact on many of the down ballot races, particularly for 801.799.5711 the State House, where the margins are razor thin. The Salt Lake County Salt Lake City clerk acknowledges they still have many ballots to count over the next few [email protected] days as results are finalized. Some races in the State House are close enough that we likely won't know the victor until the final canvass is complete. You can follow the return updates at elections.utah.gov. Utah Federal Offices: Overview: The Republican Party will continue to hold all of Utah's U.S. Senate and Congressional seats. In each of the Utah races, the incumbent won. Given the Republican control of the 115th Congress, the Utah delegation is well positioned to keep or gain important chairmanships or leadership positions. U.S. Senate: Incumbent Republican Senator Mike Lee easily cruised to victory against Democratic challenger Misty Snow in a 68% to 27% victory. This was never a serious test for Lee, but did feature a first for Utah with the first transgender candidate in Snow.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Utah Legislature Rated This Combines, Standardizes and Averages Rankings Issued by 6 Special-Interest Groups
    2012 Utah Legislature Rated This combines, standardizes and averages rankings issued by 6 special-interest groups. Higher scores mean members are 'redder' conservative; lower scores are 'bluer' liberal. Conservatives have higher rates of losses and being forced into primaries this year. Utah Senate Members Member Affiliation Rating Member Affiliation Rating Casey Anderson2 R-Cedar City 86% Allen Christensen R-North Ogden 74% Howard Stephenson R-Draper 84% Michael Waddoups R-Taylorsville 73% Mark Madsen R-Eagle Mountain 84% David Hinkins R-Orangeville 72% Jerry Stevenson R-Layton 82% Todd Weiler R-Woods Cross 71% Scott Jenkins R-Plain City 82% Peter Knudson R-Brigham City 66% Stephen Urquhart R-St. George 80% Kevin Van Tassell R-Vernal 63% Margaret Dayton R-Orem 80% Lyle Hillyard R-Logan 57% Stuart Adams R-Layton 79% Gene Davis D-Salt Lake 44% Stuart Reid R-Ogden 77% Karen Mayne D-West Valley 43% Daniel Thatcher R-West Valley 77% Ben McAdams D-Salt Lake 40% Wayne Niederhauser R-Sandy 77% Karen Morgan D-Cottonwood Heights 39% Aaron Osmond R-West Jordan 76% Pat Jones D-Holladay 38% Curt Bramble R-Provo 75% Ross Romero1 D-Salt Lake 32% Ralph Okerlund2 R-Monroe 74% Luz Robles D-Salt Lake 31% John Valentine R-Orem 74% Utah House Members Member Affiliation Ratting Member Affiliation Rating Ken Sumsion1 R-American Fork 93% Ronda Menlove R-Garland 70% Craig Frank1 R-Pleasant Grove 91% Stewart Barlow R-Fruit Heights 70% Mike Morley R-Spanish Fork 90% LaVar Christensen R-Draper 69% John Dougall2 R-Highland 89% Jim Dunnigan R-Taylorsville 67% Curt Oda R-Clearfield 88% Johnny Anderson R-Taylorsville 67% Brad Daw2 R-Orem 88% V.
    [Show full text]