DOCSLIB.ORG

Swiss Banks and Palm Oil and Pulp & Paper in Indonesia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Swiss Banks and Palm Oil and Pulp & Paper in Indonesia Swiss banks and palm oil and pulp & paper in Indonesia A research paper prepared for WWF International December 2001 Jan Willem van Gelder Profundo De Bloemen 24 1902 GV Castricum The Netherlands Tel: +31-251-658385 Fax: +31-251-658386 E-mail: [email protected] Contents Summary ..................................................................................................................i Introduction................................................................................................................1 Chapter 1 Influence assessment of financial institutions....................................2 1.1 The financing of companies....................................................................................2 1.2 Private financial institutions ...................................................................................3 1.3 Public financial institutions.....................................................................................5 1.4 Categories of financial services .............................................................................5 1.4.1 Services related to acquiring equity ...............................................................5 1.4.2 Services related to acquiring debt ..................................................................6 1.4.3 Other financial services ..................................................................................7 1.5 Assessing the influence of financial institutions..................................................9 1.5.1 The present role of financial institutions .........................................................9 1.5.2 Directness of the financial service................................................................10 1.5.3 Currency of the financial relation..................................................................10 1.5.4 Financial importance of the service..............................................................10 1.5.5 Influence assessment...................................................................................11 Chapter 2 Overview of the Indonesian oil palm sector ......................................13 2.1 The oil palm production chain ..............................................................................13 2.1.1 Oil palm plantations......................................................................................13 2.1.2 CPO mills .....................................................................................................14 2.1.3 Crushing plants ............................................................................................14 2.1.4 Refineries .....................................................................................................15 2.1.5 Final processing industries...........................................................................15 2.2 The expansion of the Indonesian oil palm sector ...............................................16 2.3 The financing of the Indonesian oil palm expansion..........................................17 2.4 The slackening of the Indonesian oil palm expansion .......................................18 Chapter 3 Indonesian palm oil companies ..........................................................24 3.1 Astra Group ............................................................................................................24 3.1.1 Description of the Astra Group .....................................................................24 3.1.2 Oil palm holdings of the Astra Group ...........................................................24 3.1.3 Financial stakeholders PT Astra Agro Lestari Tbk. ......................................26 3.1.4 Financial stakeholders PT Sumalindo Lestari Jaya Tbk...............................27 3.1.5 Financial stakeholders PT Astra International Tbk.......................................28 3.2 Bakrie Group...........................................................................................................31 3.2.1 Description of the Bakrie Group ...................................................................31 3.2.2 Oil palm holdings of the Bakrie Group..........................................................31 3.2.3 Financial stakeholders PT Bakrie Sumatera Plantations Tbk. .....................32 3.2.4 Financial stakeholders PT Bakrie & Brothers Tbk........................................33 3.3 Barito Pacific Group...............................................................................................35 3.3.1 Description of the Barito Pacific Group ........................................................35 3.3.2 Oil palm holdings of the Barito Pacific Group...............................................35 3.3.3 Financial stakeholders Barito Pacific Timber Tbk. .......................................36 3.4 Johor Group............................................................................................................38 3.4.1 Description of the Johor Group ....................................................................38 3.4.2 Oil palm holdings of the Johor Group...........................................................38 3.4.3 Financial stakeholders Kulim (Malaysia) Berhad .........................................39 3.5 LonSum, Napan and Risjadson Groups...............................................................41 3.5.1 Description of the LonSum, Napan and Risjadson Groups..........................41 3.5.2 Oil palm holdings of the LonSum, Napan and Risjadson Groups ................41 3.5.3 Financial stakeholders PT PP London Sumatra Indonesia Tbk. ..................43 3.5.4 Financial stakeholders PT Pan London Sumatra Plantation ........................45 3.6 Raja Garuda Mas Group ........................................................................................47 3.6.1 Description of the Raja Garuda Mas Group .................................................47 3.6.2 Oil palm holdings of the Raja Garuda Mas Group........................................47 3.6.3 Financial stakeholders PT Asianagro Lestari ...............................................49 3.6.4 Financial stakeholders PT Inti Indosawit Subur ...........................................49 3.6.5 Financial stakeholders PT Kalimantan Sanggar Pusaka .............................49 3.7 Salim Group ............................................................................................................51 3.7.1 Description of the Salim Group ....................................................................51 3.7.2 Oil palm holdings of the Salim Group...........................................................51 3.7.3 Financial stakeholders PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk. ..........................54 3.7.4 Financial stakeholders PT Inti Indosawit Subur ...........................................55 3.7.5 Financial stakeholders First Pacific Company Ltd........................................55 3.8 Sinar Mas Group.....................................................................................................57 3.8.1 Description of the Sinar Mas Group .............................................................57 3.8.2 Oil palm holdings of the Sinar Mas Group....................................................57 3.8.3 Financial stakeholders Golden Agri-Resources Ltd. ....................................62 3.8.4 Financial stakeholders Asia Food & Properties Ltd......................................64 3.9 Sipef Group.............................................................................................................65 3.9.1 Description of the Sipef Group .....................................................................65 3.9.2 Oil palm holdings of the Sipef Group............................................................65 3.9.3 Financial stakeholders S.A. Sipef N.V..........................................................66 Chapter 4 Overview of the Indonesian pulp & paper sector ..............................68 4.1 The pulp & paper production chain......................................................................68 4.2 Expansion of the Indonesian pulp & paper sector..............................................68 4.3 Supplying the Indonesian pulp & paper expansion............................................69 4.4 Financing the Indonesian pulp & paper expansion ............................................70 4.5 The slackening of the Indonesian pulp & paper expansion...............................71 Chapter 5 Indonesian pulp & paper companies..................................................74 5.1 Barito Pacific Group...............................................................................................74 5.1.1 Description of the Barito Pacific Group ........................................................74 5.1.2 Pulp & paper holdings of the Barito Pacific Group .......................................74 5.1.3 Financial stakeholders PT Tanjungenim Lestari Pulp & Paper ....................75 5.1.4 Financial stakeholders Barito Pacific Timber Tbk. .......................................75 5.2 Dirgahayu Group ....................................................................................................78 5.2.1 Description of the Dirgahayu Group .............................................................78 5.2.2 Pulp & paper holdings of the Dirgahayu Group............................................78 5.2.3 Financial stakeholders PT Surabaya Agung Industri Pulp & Kertas Tbk......78 5.3 Raja Garuda Mas Group ........................................................................................79
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2016 Sateri Sustainability Report I 1
    2016 Sateri Sustainability Report I 1 2016 Sateri Sustainability Report 2016 Sateri Sustainability Report I 2 Contents 03 About the Report 04 The CEO’s Message 05 About Sateri 08 Sustainability Management 09 Sustainability Vision 10 Sustainability Policy 11 Sustainability Strategy 13 Sustainability Goals 16 Materiality Analysis 17 Stakeholder Engagement 18 Our Customers and Business Partners 20 Care for Customers and Consumers 26 Care for Business Partners 32 Our Environment 34 Environmental Management 37 Environmental Operations 48 Our Community and Employees 50 Care for Employees 56 Care for the Community 62 Outlook 2017 63 Assurance Statement 65 GRI Index 2016 Sateri Sustainability Report I 3 About the Report This Sustainability Report for 2016 is the first by Sateri, a global leader in the responsible and sustainable production of viscose from plantation wood and a member of the Royal Golden Eagle (RGE) group of resources-based companies. The report states Sateri’s sustainability philosophy and strategy and summarises our sustainability performance and practices in 2016. Sateri believes it is crucial to communicate with all stakeholders and we hope this report helps to promote better understanding of our sustainability efforts and collaborations to build win-win relationships. Reporting Period The reporting period is Jan 1, 2016 to Dec 31, 2016 – not including Linz (Nanjing) Viscose Yarn Co., Ltd. Sateri acquired a majority stake in Linz (Nanjing) in May 2016, so its reporting period runs from June to December 2016. The report will be published every year. Scope of the Report The report covers: • Sateri’s Shanghai headquarters • Sateri’s three viscose mills in China: Sateri (Jiangxi) Chemical Fibre Co., Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Pacific Investments Corporation and Subsidiaries
    Metro Pacific Investments Corporation and Subsidiaries Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2019 and 2018 and Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 and Independent Auditor’s Report SyCip Gorres Velayo & Co. Tel: (632) 891 0307 BOA/PRC Reg. No. 0001, 6760 Ayala Avenue Fax: (632) 819 0872 October 4, 2018, valid until August 24, 2021 1226 Makati City ey.com/ph SEC Accreditation No. 0012-FR-5 (Group A), Philippines November 6, 2018, valid until November 5, 2021 INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT The Board of Directors and Stockholders Metro Pacific Investments Corporation Opinion We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Metro Pacific Investments Corporation and its subsidiaries (the Company), which comprise the consolidated statements of financial position as at December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the consolidated statements of comprehensive income, consolidated statements of changes in equity and consolidated statements of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, and notes to the consolidated financial statements, including a summary of significant accounting policies. In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as at December 31, 2019 and 2018, and its consolidated financial performance and its consolidated cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019 in accordance with Philippine Financial Reporting Standards (PFRSs). Basis for Opinion We conducted our audits in accordance with Philippine Standards on Auditing (PSAs). Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements section of our report.
    [Show full text]
  • Request for Consideration of the Situation of Indigenous Peoples In
    Request for Consideration of the Situation of Indigenous Peoples in Kalimantan, Indonesia, under the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination’s Urgent Action and Early Warning Procedures Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination Seventy-First Session 30 July – 18 August 2007 Submitted by Perkumpulan Sawit Watch Aliansi Masyarakat Adat Nusantara/AMAN (Indigenous People Alliance of the Archipelago) Aliansi Masyarakat Adat Kalimantan Barat (Indigenous People Alliance of West Kalimantan) Lembaga Studi dan Advokasi Masyarakat/ELSAM (Center for Community Study and Advocacy) Wahana Lingkungan Hidup Indonesia/WALHI (Friends of the Earth Indonesia) Perkumpulan Untuk Pembaharuan Hukum Berbasis Masyarakat dan Ekologis/HuMA (Association for Community- and Ecologically-based Legal Reform) Yayasan Padi Indonesia Lembaga Bela Banua Talino Lembaga Gemawan (Lembaga Pengembangan Masyarakat Swandiri/The Institution of Swandiri Society Empowerment) Institut Dayakologi Forest Peoples Programme 6 July 2007 Contents Page Executive Summary 1 Submitting Organizations 4 I. INTRODUCTION 6 II. INDIGENOUS PEOPLES IN INDONESIA 8 III. OIL PALM PLANTATIONS AND INDIGENOUS PEOPLES’ 10 RIGHTS IV. PERSISTENT VIOLATION OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES' 11 RIGHTS IN KALIMANTAN V. INDONESIA IS IN THE ADVANCED STAGES OF ESTABLISHING MASSIVE PALM OIL PLANTATIONS IN INDIGENOUS PEOPLES’ TRADITIONAL TERRITORIES IN 13 KALIMANTAN VI. INDONESIAN LAW DISCRIMINATES AGAINST INDIGENOUS 17 PEOPLES A. The Constitution 17 B. The Basic Agrarian Law 18 C. The 1999 Forestry Act 19 D. The 2004 Plantation Act 20 VII. REQUEST 22 VIII. ANNEXES 23 A. ‘President Admits Indigenous People Mistreated’, Jakarta Post, 10 August 24 2006 B. Oil Palm and Other Commercial Tree Plantations, Mono-cropping: 25 Impacts on Indigenous Peoples’ Land Tenure and Resource Management Systems and Livelihoods, UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues Working Paper, E/C.19/2007/CRP.6 C.
    [Show full text]
  • Oil Palm Plantations and Transboundary Haze: Patronage Networks and Land
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UM Digital Repository HELENA VARKKEY POST-PRINT WETLANDS 1 Oil Palm Plantations and Transboundary Haze: Patronage Networks and Land 2 Licensing in Indonesia’s Peatlands 3 Helena Varkkey 4 5 Department of International and Strategic Studies, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala 6 Lumpur, Malaysia 7 Email: [email protected] 8 Tel: +60123162146 9 Fax: +60323008318 10 1 HELENA VARKKEY POST-PRINT WETLANDS 11 Oil Palm Plantations and Transboundary Haze: Patronage Networks and Land 12 Licensing in Indonesia’s Peatlands 13 By HELENA VARKKEY 14 15 Peatlands in Indonesia are protected by regulations that forbid the conversion of these lands 16 into plantations. However, peat fires here have been found to be a major source of smoke that 17 travels across national boundaries creating regional haze. Despite these regulations, more 18 than a quarter of all Indonesian oil palm plantations are on peat. This paper argues that 19 patronage networks within the Indonesian oil palm sector have been a major factor in the 20 unsustainable use of peatlands there. Rampant patronage politics have made it easy for well- 21 connected companies to skirt regulations to obtain licenses for these lands. Decentralization 22 has further encouraged this practice at the regional level, as regional elites are eager to reap 23 the benefits of local investments. In addition, clients are able to exert their influence over 24 state decision-making to ensure that any changes to the licensing process does not jeopardize 25 their access to these lands.
    [Show full text]
  • RGE Chairman Sukanto Tanoto Addresses Wharton Students in Asia for Course on Sustainable Growth in ASEAN
    RGE Chairman Sukanto Tanoto Addresses Wharton Students in Asia for Course on Sustainable Growth in ASEAN SINGAPORE, May 27, 2015 – RGE welcomed about 50 EMBA and MBA students from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania as they commenced their 5-day visit to Singapore, Malaysia, and Indonesia as part of their Global Modular Course on 'Sustainable Growth in ASEAN'. RGE Chairman, Sukanto Tanoto, addresses visiting Wharton students Addressing the students in Singapore on May 25 as keynote speaker, RGE's Founder and Chairman Sukanto Tanoto spoke about how he scaled and diversified his businesses, which now occupy strategic points in the resource-based manufacturing value chain. With almost 50 years of successful entrepreneur experience under his belt, Mr Tanoto shared candidly about his journey as an entrepreneur, including how he survived the Asian Financial Crisis in the late 1990s, and sought to diversify his business after the crisis. He cited building diverse teams with multiple skill sets, focusing on technology and innovation, and creating shared value and the "3C" values, as success factors that underpin each of RGE's business groups. "We continue to embrace the 3Cs in everything we do: Good for Community, Good for Country, Good for Company. If we do what is good for the community and country, the company will benefit," said Mr Tanoto. The 3Cs are evident in his companies' work, which includes creating direct and indirect employment, partnering and empowering smallholders, developing the communities and infrastructure in its areas of operations, and implementing state-of-the art technologies for sustainability and competitive advantage.
    [Show full text]
  • FPC IR Handout 2019 03 26
    Information Summary for Investors HKEx: 00142 Creating ADR: FPAFY long-term value www.firstpacific.com in Asia Copyright © First Pacific Company Limited 26 March 2019. All rights reserved. Consumer Foods Infrastructure Natural Resources Telecommunications First Pacific owns 50.1% of First Pacific owns 42.0% of First Pacific owns 31.2% of First Pacific owns 25.6% of Indofood and has an MPIC and has economic Philex and Two Rivers, a PLDT which in turn owns economic interest of 40.3% interests of 19.1% in PhiliPPine affiliate, holds 100% of Smart, its mobile in ICBP. Meralco, 26.2% in Global 15.0%. First Pacific holds an telecommunications Business Power, 47.3% of effective economic interest subsidiary. PacificLiGht, 22.2% of of 42.4% in PXP EnerGy, Maynilad, and 41.9% of 31.4% in IndoAgri, and Metro Pacific Tollways. 50.0% in Roxas HoldinGs. 2 Senior Management of First Pacific Joseph H.P. Ng John W. Ryan Stanley H. Yang Exec. Vice President, Chief Investor Relations Exec. Vice President, Manuel V. Pangilinan Chris H. Young Executive Director Group Finance & Sustainability Officer Corp. Development Managing Director and CEO & Chief Financial Officer Ray C. Espinosa Victorico P. Vargas Marilyn A. Associate Director Assistant Director Victorio-Aquino Assistant Director 3 Gross Asset Value of $5.45 Billion Investment Objectives Roxas Holdings o Unlock value, enhance cash flows to deliver $39 mln (0.7%) dividend/distribution returns, grow share price, and Philex finance further investment in value-enhancing PLP $230 Group $338 businesses, taking
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in the Indonesian Flour Milling Sector
    TRENDS IN THE INDONESIAN FLOUR MILLING SECTOR By: Franciscus Welirang Chairman of APTINDO (Association of Flour Producers in Indonesia) Director of PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk (Bogasari Flour Mills) AGIC Indonesia Jakarta, March 5th, 2019 PRE & POST DEREGULATION OF INDONESIAN WHEAT FLOUR INDUSTRY – THE HISTORY PRE Deregulation POST Deregulation (BULOG Era) SUBJECT Total 1970-1998 1999-2009 2010-2014 2015 - 2018 Total 4 4 + 7 = 11 11 + 15 = 26 27+ 4 (-3) 28 Cilegon (3); Tangerang (2); Jakarta (1); Jakarta & Gresik (1); Medan (2); Cilegon (1); Java: 23 Surabaya (1); Tangerang (1); Bekasi (2); Cilegon (-1) Outside Java: 5 Location Makassar (1); Sidoarjo (3); Gresik(3); Tangerang (-1); (Centralized in Semarang (1); Medan (1); Sidoarjo (1); Bekasi (-1); Java ) Cilacap (1); Cilegon (1) Mojokerto (1); Surabaya (1); Semarang (1) Total of Wheat Mill Capacity : +/- 11.8 million MT/year 2 INDONESIAN FLOUR MILLS LOCATION - 2019 (28 Factories) Bogasari Sriboga Wilmar group Agri First Halim Sari (Jakarta; Tng Semarang Medan Medan Cibitung; Surabaya) Manunggal Eastern Pearl Cerestar group Perkasa (Makassar & Cerestar/Harves Cilacap Cilegon) Wings group tar (Cilegon, Gresik, Mdn) Agrofood, Jakaranatama Mojokerto Medan Pioner Sidoarjo Wilmar (Dumai) Purnomo Sidoarjo Mustafamesindo, Batam (relocate) Asia Raya Sidoarjo Crown Tangerang Pakindo Sidoarjo Bungasari Cilegon Murti Jaya Gresik Nutrindo (Mayora) Wilmar Total Cap: +/- 11.8 (Gresik) Cilegon million MT/year Pundi Fugui / Mill Agro Centralized in Java Kencana, Jakaranatama Horizon Sariinti Paramasuka
    [Show full text]
  • (SMG/APP) WWF-Indonesia 8 June 2018 Sinar Mas Gr
    WWF Advisory to Buyers and Investors of Sinar Mas Group / Asia Pulp & Paper (SMG/APP) WWF-Indonesia 8 June 2018 Sinar Mas Group’s Asia Pulp & Paper (SMG/APP) and its pulpwood have had a 30-year history of deforestation, wildlife habitat destruction, peat drainage and conflict with local communities related to the acquisition of land for wood harvesting and pulpwood plantation development in Sumatra and Kalimantan, Indonesia (see timeline of deforestation here). In February 2013, APP committed to halt deforestation under its Forest Conservation Policy (FCP)1 and to disassociate from suppliers that violate the FCP. While WWF believes that Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certification is the best way to get independent and objective verification of a company’s performance on environmentally responsible, socially beneficial and economically viable forest management, it cannot be used to verify the performance of SMG/APP companies, affiliates and their wood suppliers. This is because APP was disassociated by FSC in 20072 due to rampant deforestation, making it the first among a very small number of the most controversial companies in the world FSC has disassociated from. In 2017, Associated Press (AP) reported on the many hidden corporate relationships of APP and highlighted the company’s links to deforestation, despite its public sustainability commitments3, 4, 5. On May 16, Greenpeace announced that they were ending all engagement with APP after its investigation alleged that 8,000 hectares of natural forest and peatland were cleared in violation of APP’s FCP in two concessions which were previously undeclared by APP but are linked to APP and SMG.6 As early as 2015, WWF and other civil society organizations had already reported that one of the two concessions (PT.
    [Show full text]
  • Only Yesterday in Jakarta: Property Boom and Consumptive Trends in the Late New Order Metropolitan City
    Southeast Asian Studies, Vol. 38, No.4, March 2001 Only Yesterday in Jakarta: Property Boom and Consumptive Trends in the Late New Order Metropolitan City ARAI Kenichiro* Abstract The development of the property industry in and around Jakarta during the last decade was really conspicuous. Various skyscrapers, shopping malls, luxurious housing estates, condominiums, hotels and golf courses have significantly changed both the outlook and the spatial order of the metropolitan area. Behind the development was the government's policy of deregulation, which encouraged the active involvement of the private sector in urban development. The change was accompanied by various consumptive trends such as the golf and cafe boom, shopping in gor­ geous shopping centers, and so on. The dominant values of ruling elites became extremely con­ sumptive, and this had a pervasive influence on general society. In line with this change, the emergence of a middle class attracted the attention of many observers. The salient feature of this new "middle class" was their consumptive lifestyle that parallels that of middle class as in developed countries. Thus it was the various new consumer goods and services mentioned above, and the new places of consumption that made their presence visible. After widespread land speculation and enormous oversupply of property products, the property boom turned to bust, leaving massive non-performing loans. Although the boom was not sustainable and it largely alienated urban lower strata, the boom and resulting bust represented one of the most dynamic aspect of the late New Order Indonesian society. I Introduction In 1998, Indonesia's "New Order" ended.
    [Show full text]
  • Indonesia's Year of Living Prosperously
    INDONESIA’S YEAR OF LIVING PROSPEROUSLY Written by William Mellor / Bloomberg News Saturday, 03 July 2010 18:14 The mineral-rich nation once dominated by a dictatorship may grow Faster than Brazil this year. It’s poised to become an emerging-marKet giant—if it can Finally shaKe oFF crony capitalism. IF al-Qaeda-linKed terrorists thought they could drive Foreign investors out of Indonesia, they didn’t recKon with the liKes of Jim Castle. Seven years ago, Castle, a Michigan-born consultant For 100 multinational companies—including Citigroup Inc., Exxon Mobil Corp. and Nestlé SA—was having lunch at Jakarta’s JW Marriott hotel when a trucK bomb detonated outside the building, Killing 12 people and injuring 150. Castle walked away unhurt. Last July, he was less lucKy while hosting a breaKFast meeting at the same hotel. Two suicide bombers strucK in near-simultaneous blasts at the Marriott and the nearby Ritz- Carlton. Nine people died in the attacKs, and Castle clambered From the rubble grazed, dazed and with temporary hearing loss. A year aFter that second escape, Castle, 64, continues to do business in JaKarta and shrugs oFF the dangers he Faces, Bloomberg Markets reports in its July issue. “More people here die From dengue Fever than From terrorist attacKs,” he says. The resilience displayed by Castle, Founder of CastleAsia, is paying ofF as the world’s fourth-most populous nation—home to the single largest Muslim population—basKs in a consumer and resources-driven boom. “Indonesia’s potential is dramatic,” says Hugh Young, who helps manage $260 billion, including Indonesian shares, at Aberdeen Asset Management Plc in Singapore.
    [Show full text]
  • Indonesia: Travel Advice MANILA
    Indonesia: Travel Advice MANILA B M U M KRUNG THEP A R (BANGKOK) CAMBODIA N M T International Boundary A E Medan I PHNOM PENH V Administrative Boundary 0 10 miles Andaman National Capital 0 20 km Sea T Administrative Centre H South A SUMATERA PHILIPPINES Other Town I L UTARA A Major Road N D China Sea MELEKEOKRailway 0 200 400 miles Banda Aceh Mount Sinabung 0 600 kilometres BANDAR SERI BEGAWAN A Langsa BRUNEI I ACEH MALAYSIA S Celebes Medan Y KALIMANTAN A Tarakan KUALA LUMPUR UTARA Pematangsiantar L Tanjung Selor SeaSULAWESI A UTARA PACIFIC SUMATERA M Tanjungredeb GORONTALO Dumai UTARA SINGAPORE Manado SINGAPORE Tolitoli Padangsidempuan Tanjungpinang Sofifi RIAU Pekanbaru KALIMANTAN OCEAN Nias Singkawang TIMUR KEPULAUAN Pontianak Gorontalo Sumatera RIAU Borneo Payakumbuh KALIMANTAN Samarinda SULAWESI Labuha Manokwari Padang (Sumatra) BARAT TENGAH KEPULAUAN Palu MALUKU Sorong SUMATERA Jambi BANGKA BELITUNG KALIMANTAN Maluku Siberut Balikpapan UTARA PAPUA BARAT TENGAH Sulawesi BARAT JAMBI Pangkalpinang Palangkaraya SULAWESI Sungaipenuh Ketapang BARAT Bobong (Moluccas) Jayapura SUMATERA Sampit (Celebes) SELATAN KALIMANTAN Mamuju Namlea Palembang SELATAN Seram Bula Lahat Prabumulih Banjarmasin Majene Bengkulu Kendari Ambon PAPUA Watampone BENGKULU LAMPUNG INDONESIA Bandar JAKARTA Java Sea Makassar New Lampung JAKARTA SULAWESI Banda JAWA TENGAH SULAWESI MALUKU Guinea Serang JAWA TIMUR SELATAN TENGGARA Semarang Kepulauan J Sumenep Sea Aru PAPUA BANTEN Bandung a w a PAPUA ( J a v Surabaya JAWA a ) NUSA TENGGARA Lumajang BALI BARAT Kepulauan
    [Show full text]
  • POTENSI AIR TANAH DANGKAL DI DAERAH KELURAHAN KOTA BARU KECAMATAN PONTIANAK SELATAN - KOTA PONTIANAK (Studi Kasus Jalan Dr
    POTENSI AIR TANAH DANGKAL DI DAERAH KELURAHAN KOTA BARU KECAMATAN PONTIANAK SELATAN - KOTA PONTIANAK (Studi Kasus Jalan Dr. Sutomo – Ampera) Astra Wijaya1, Marsudi2, Robby Irsan1 1Program Studi Teknik Lingkungan, Universitas Tanjungpura, Pontianak 2Program Studi Teknik Sipil, Universitas Tanjungpura, Pontianak email: [email protected] ABSTRAK Daerah Kota Baru, Kelurahan Kota Baru, Kecamatan Pontianak Selatan, Kota Pontianak, tepatnya di jalan Dr. Sutomo sampai jalan Ampera merupakan daerah pemukiman serta perdagangan yang sering mengalami kekurangan air bersih terutama pada musim kemarau. Daerah tersebut sebenarnya sudah terjangkau oleh jaringan Perusahaan Daerah Air Minum (PDAM) namun jumlah air masih terbatas dan kualitas masih kurang baik hanya melayani 78.194 pelanggan dengan cakupan 74,1% penduduk (Perusahaan Daerah Air Minum Kota Pontianak, 2012). Salah satu upaya yang dilakukan untuk mengatasi kekurangan air baku adalah dengan memanfaatkan sumber air tanah bebas sebagai sumber air baku. Penelitian bertujuan untuk mengetahui kuantitas air menurut Kepmen Energi dan SDM No.1451/10/MEM/2000, kualitas air berdasarkan PP No.82 Tahun 2001 kelas I serta arah aliran/pola sebaran didaerah penelitian. Pengukuran tinggi muka air tanah dan pengambilan sampel air tanah pada waktu sebelum hujan/kemarau pada tanggal 3 Februari 2014 dan setelah hujan pada tanggal 1 Maret 2014. Sumur yang dipilih sebanyak 12 titik untuk pengukuran tinggi muka air tanah serta kuantitas air di daerah penelitian sedangkan uji kualitas dipilih 4 sumur dengan metode pengambilan sampel menggunakan grab sampel. Parameter yang di uji adalah TSS, TDS, Besi (Fe), pH, Sulfat (SO4) dan BOD5. Kuantitas air tanah sebelum hujan untuk debit maksimum 0,003645 l/detik sedangkan setelah hujan debit maksimum sebesar 0,004062 l/detik.
    [Show full text]