DOCSLIB.ORG

Peary Caribou (Rangifer Tarandus Pearyi) Tuktu Tuktuinak Tuktuaraaluit Tuttunguluurat Caribou De Peary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Peary Caribou (Rangifer Tarandus Pearyi) Tuktu Tuktuinak Tuktuaraaluit Tuttunguluurat Caribou De Peary SPECIES STATUS REPORT Peary Caribou (Rangifer tarandus pearyi) Tuktu Tuktuinak Tuktuaraaluit Tuttunguluurat Caribou de Peary in the Northwest Territories Threatened December 2012 Status of Peary Caribou in the NWT Species at Risk Committee status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of species suspected of being at risk in the Northwest Territories (NWT). Suggested citation: Species at Risk Committee. 2012. Species Status Report for Peary Caribou (Rangifer tarandus pearyi) in the Northwest Territories. Species at Risk Committee, Yellowknife, NT. © Government of the Northwest Territories on behalf of the Species at Risk Committee ISBN: 978-0-7708-0203-5 Production note: The drafts of this report were prepared by Roger McMillan (traditional and community knowledge component) and Kim Poole and Anne Gunn (scientific knowledge component), prepared under contract with the Government of the Northwest Territories, and edited by Joanna Wilson and Michelle Henderson. For additional copies contact: Species at Risk Secretariat c/o SC6, Department of Environment and Natural Resources P.O. Box 1320 Yellowknife, NT X1A 2L9 Tel.: (855) 783-4301 (toll free) Fax.: (867) 873-0293 E-mail: [email protected] www.nwtspeciesatrisk.ca ABOUT THE SPECIES AT RISK COMMITTEE The Species at Risk Committee was established under the Species at Risk (NWT) Act. It is an independent committee of experts responsible for assessing the biological status of species at risk in the NWT. The Committee uses the assessments to make recommendations on the listing of species at risk. The Committee uses objective biological criteria in its assessments and does not consider socio-economic factors. Assessments are based on species status reports that include the best available Aboriginal traditional knowledge, community knowledge and scientific knowledge of the species. The status report is approved by the Committee before a species is assessed. ABOUT THIS REPORT This species status report is a comprehensive report that compiles and analyzes the best available information on the biological status of Peary caribou in the NWT, as well as existing and potential threats and positive influences. Full guidelines for the preparation of species status reports, including a description of the review process, may be found at www.nwtspeciesatrisk.ca. Environment and Natural Resources, Government of the Northwest Territories, provides full administrative and financial support to the Species at Risk Committee. Cover illustration photo credit: John A. Nagy, GNWT Status of Peary Caribou in the NWT Assessment of Peary Caribou The Northwest Territories Species at Risk Committee met in Behchokö, Northwest Territories on December 4, 2012 and assessed the biological status of Peary Caribou in the Northwest Territories. The assessment process and objective biological criteria used by the Species at Risk Committee are available at www.nwtspeciesatrisk.ca. Status: Threatened in the Northwest Territories Likely to become endangered in the Northwest Territories if nothing is done to reverse the factors leading to its extirpation or extinction Reasons for the assessment: Peary Caribou fits criteria (a) and (c) for Threatened (a) – There is evidence that the population is declining in such a way that it could disappear from the Northwest Territories in our children’s lifetime (c) – There is evidence that the population size is small and there is a decline and change [fluctuation] in population size such that it could disappear from the Northwest Territories in our children’s lifetime • All three Peary caribou subpopulations in the Northwest Territories display similar trends. High abundance was recorded in either the 1970s or 80s (Banks and northwest Victoria Islands) or the early 1960s (western Queen Elizabeth Islands), followed by steep declines (averaging >90%), with little evidence for recovery to historic higher numbers over a 20 year period. • The only evidence of some recovery has been seen in the Queen Elizabeth Islands. • The sustained low numbers (estimated 7,250 individuals) and high population variability between survey years suggest high vulnerability to further declines. • A key influence that likely halted the decline of Peary caribou in the 1990s was the restriction of hunting, especially of female caribou. • There does not seem to be an imminent threat (i.e. they are not facing imminent extinction), but they are very vulnerable to random catastrophic events. Page ii of 137 Status of Peary Caribou in the NWT • Peary caribou only exist in the Northwest Territories and Nunavut. Northwest Territories and Nunavut cannot count on a rescue effect from each other, because Peary caribou numbers are low across their entire range. Threats to Peary Caribou and its habitat are: • Aspects of climate change alter availability of forage and ability to move between islands; • Increasing frequency of severe weather events due to climate change; • Potential disturbance from industrial exploration and development and human activity; • Potential competition for food and space with muskoxen; • Potential for overharvesting; and • Predation on Peary caribou by wolves is a threat due to small population size of Peary caribou. Positive influences on Peary Caribou and its habitat are: • Peary caribou are listed as Endangered under the federal Species at Risk Act and a recovery strategy must be developed by 2014; • Harvest quotas and voluntary restrictions on harvest; • Strong co-management and community leadership has resulted in the harvest quotas being reduced substantially and carefully monitored; • Habitat management is well-defined through Community Conservation Plans and the Inuvialuit Land Administration’s practice of seeking approval from local Hunters and Trappers Committees before approving development-related proposals; • Some incidental habitat protection through Aulavik National Park and Migratory Bird Sanctuary No.1; and • Some aspects of climate change could be beneficial to Peary caribou. These include warmer winters and more available high quality forage in summer. Page iii of 137 Status of Peary Caribou in the NWT Recommended measures to conserve Peary Caribou and its habitat are: • Reproduce historical studies on forage quantity, quality and snow conditions on Banks Island to better determine the effects of climate change on Peary caribou ecology; • Conduct frequent population surveys on Peary caribou; • Cooperate with other jurisdictions to ensure effective management of this trans-boundary species; • Commit funding to continue the collection and documentation of traditional knowledge on Peary caribou; • Monitor the effects of permafrost change on Peary caribou ecology; and • Substantially improve weather monitoring in the Arctic. Page iv of 137 Status of Peary Caribou in the NWT Executive Summary Traditional and Community Knowledge Scientific Knowledge Description Tuktuk (singular: Tuktu, Peary caribou, or Peary caribou (Rangifer tarandus pearyi) are Rangifer tarandus pearyi) are recognized by small in stature and have noticeably short legs Inuvialuit based on their smaller size, lighter and face. The winter coat is distinctive in being colour, and different taste and texture of the white with a pale brown back in early winter. meat compared to other groups of caribou. In summer, the coat is slate grey on the back Inuvialuit have historically used them as a and does not have the pronounced flank stripe primary source of food and clothing while typical of barren-ground caribou. The pale living and traveling on Banks Island and gray antler velvet is a striking distinguishing Northwest Victoria Island. They remain a characteristic compared to the brown velvet of preferred source of food for residents of Sachs barren-ground or woodland caribou. Harbour and Ulukhaktok. Distribution Peary caribou live on the islands of the Peary caribou are restricted to the High Arctic Canadian Arctic archipelago. Within the (Queen Elizabeth Islands) and the mid-Arctic Arctic islands of the NWT, records of islands of Canada, as well as the very northern community and traditional knowledge pertain extension of the mainland (Boothia Peninsula). almost exclusively to Banks Island and In the Northwest Territories (NWT), Peary Northwest Victoria Island; little has been caribou live on Banks Island, northwest documented for the Western Queen Elizabeth Victoria Island and the western Queen Islands. Elizabeth Islands. There have been observed movements of The current distribution in the NWT covers caribou between Banks and Northwest Victoria approximately 144,000 km2 and is naturally Island. On Northwest Victoria Island, Peary discontinuous (fragmented) by island caribou are found north of Ulukhaktok, geography and caribou behaviour into three predominantly north and northeast of Minto geographical subpopulations (sometimes called Page v of 137 Status of Peary Caribou in the NWT Traditional and Community Knowledge Scientific Knowledge Inlet and west of the Shaler Mountains. On herds). Surveys and observations have Banks Island, Peary caribou range across most indicated a halt to in migration between eastern of the island. Peary caribou are also known to coastal Banks and northwest Victoria islands, live on Melville Island and other islands in the and abandonments of three of the smaller Western Queen Elizabeth group. western Queen Elizabeth Islands. Observations of Peary caribou are made mainly in the context of hunting them for food, and this practice has declined over time in both Sachs Harbour
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Volume 11, 1958
    CONTENTS Vol. XI, 1958 NO.1 Meetings of the Arctic Circle 1 Officers and Committee members for 19i8 1 Operation Hazen 1957 Z By Piper Cub to the extreme north of Canada 7 The National Film Board Expedition to Eureka, 1956 10 Ornithological research at Pelly Bay in the summer of 1956 11 An electric storm over the north pole 13 Subscriptions for 1958 13 Change of Address 14 Editorial Note 14 NO. Z The Eskimos 15 National Museum expedition to Adelaide Peninsula, 1957 Z4 Geographical Branch survey on Melville Peninsula, 1957 Z7 Inuvik Z9 Arviligjuarmiut names for birds and mammals 30 Change of Address 34 Editorial Note 34 NO.3 Eighty-fifth Meeting 35 Eighty-sixth Meeting 35 The Trail of '98 by the Gravel River Route 35 Road Programme in northern Canada 5Z Department of Transport icebreakers 55 Appointment to the Northwest Territories Council 57 Gazetteer of the Northwest Territories and Yukon 57 "New Aklavik" postmark 57 Subscriptions for 1959 58 - Change of Address 58 • Editorial Note 58 -z­ NO.4 Activities of the Geological Survey of Canada in the Canadian Arctic, 1958 59 Archaeological work in Ungava and Mansel Island 66 Anthropological field work at Great Whale River and Povung­ nituk 68 Geographical Branch survey on Melville Peninsula, 1958 71 "Eskimo Yo-Yo" 74 Change of Address 75 Editorial Note 75 - • THE ARCTIC CIRCLE THE COMMITTEE 1958 Officers President: Dr. D.C. Rose Vice-President: Mr. L.A.C.O. Hunt Secretary: Mr. D. Snowden Publications Secretary: Mr. C.J. Marshall (Mr. J.E. Clelan Treasurer: Miss Mary Murphy Editor: Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • INUVIALUIT LANGUAGE and IDENTITY: PERSPECTIVES on the SYMBOLIC MEANING of INUVIALUKTUN in the CANADIAN WESTERN ARCTIC by Alexand
    INUVIALUIT LANGUAGE AND IDENTITY: PERSPECTIVES ON THE SYMBOLIC MEANING OF INUVIALUKTUN IN THE CANADIAN WESTERN ARCTIC by Alexander C. Oehler B.A., University of Northern British Columbia, 2010 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN BRITISH COLUMBIA July 2012 © Alexander C. Oehler, 2012 Abstract: The revitalization of ancestral languages has been an issue of great concern to Aboriginal communities across North America for several decades. More recently, this concern has also found a voice in educational policy, particularly in regions where Aboriginal land claims have been ratified, and where public schools fall under a mandate to offer curricula that meet the needs of Aboriginal students. This research seeks to explore the cultural significance of Inuvialuktun, a regional Inuit language comprised of three distinct dialects traditionally spoken by the Inuvialuit of the northern Northwest Territories, Canada. More specifically, the research seeks to examine the role of current Inuvialuktun language revitalization efforts in the establishment of Inuvialuit collective and individual identities across several age groups. Tying into the sociolinguistic discourse on ancestral language revitalization in North America, the research seeks to contribute a case study from a region underrepresented in the literature on language and identity. The applied aim of the study is to provide better insight on existing language ideologies and language attitudes subscribed to by current and potential learners of Inuvialuktun in the community of Inuvik, NWT. Data obtained by the study is intended to aid local and territorial language planners in identifying potential obstacles and opportunities regarding language learner motivation.
    [Show full text]
  • (Late Tertiary) As Seen from Prince Patrick Island, Arctic Canada’ JOHN G
    ARCTIC WL. 43, NO. 4 (DECEMBER 1990) P. 393-403 Beaufort Formation (Late Tertiary) as Seen from Prince Patrick Island, Arctic Canada’ JOHN G. FYLES’ (Received 20 March 1990; accepted in revked form 14 June 1990) ABSTRACT. The Beaufort Formation, in its typearea on Prince Patrick Island, is a single lithostratigraphicunit, a few tens of metres thick, consisting of unlithified sandy deposits of braided rivers. Organicbeds in the sand have yielded more than 200 species of plants and insects and probably originated during the Pliocene, when the area supported coniferous forest. ThisBeaufort unit forms the thin eastern edge of a northwest-thickeningwedge of sand and gravel beneath the western part of the island. These largely unexposed beds,up to several hundred metres thick, include the Beaufort unit and perhaps other older or younger deposits.On the islands northeast and southwest of PrincePatrick Island (MeighenIsland to Banks Island),the name BeaufortFormation has been appliedto similar deposits of late Rrtiary age. Most recorded Beaufort beds on these islands are stratigraphically and paleontologically equivalentto the “type” Beaufort, but a few sites that have been called Beaufort (suchas Duck Hawk Bluffsand the lower unit at Ballast Brook,on Banks Island) differ stratigraphicallyand paleontologically from the “type” Beaufort. This paper recommends that these deposits (probably middle Miocene) and others like them be assigned new stratigraphic names and not be included in the Beaufort Formation as now defined. Informal names Mary Sachs gravel (Duck HawkBluffs) and Ballast Brookbeds are proposed as an initial step. Formal use of the name Beaufort Formation shouldrestricted be to the western Arctic Islands.
    [Show full text]
  • Hot Rocks from Cold Places: a Field, Geochemical and Geochronological Study from the High Arctic Large Igneous P Rovince (HALIP) at Axel Heiberg Island, Nunavut
    ! !"#$%"&'($)*"+$,"-.$/-0&1(2$3$451-.6$71"&81+5&0-$09.$ 71"&8*"9"-":5&0-$;#<.=$)*"+$#81$!5:8$3*&#5&$>0*:1$ ?:91"<($/*"@59&1$A!3>?/B$0#$3C1-$!15D1*:$?(-09.6$ E<90@<#$ $ $ by Cole Girard Kingsbury A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Earth Sciences Ottawa – Carleton Geoscience Centre and Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario © 2016 Cole Girard Kingsbury ! ! !"#$%&'$() ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) The geology of the Arctic is greatly influenced by a period of widespread Cretaceous magmatic activity, the High Arctic Large Igneous Province (HALIP). Two major tholeiitic magmatic pulses characterize HALIP: an initial 120 -130 Ma pulse that affected Arctic Canada and formally adjacent regions of Svalbard (Norway) and Franz Josef Land (Russia). In Canada, this pulse fed lava flows of the Isachsen Formation. A second 90-100 Ma pulse that apparently only affected the Canadian side of the Arctic, fed flood basalts of the Strand Fiord Formation. The goal of this thesis is to improve understanding of Arctic magmatism of the enigmatic HALIP through field, remote sensing, geochemical and geochronology investigations of mafic intrusive rocks collected in the South Fiord area of Axel Heiberg Island, Nunavut, and comparison with mafic lavas of the Isachsen and Strand Fiord Formations collected from other localities on the Island. Ground-based and remote sensing observations of the South Fiord area reveal a complex network of mafic sills and mainly SSE-trending dykes. Two new U-Pb baddeleyite ages of 95.18 ± 0.35 Ma and 95.56 ± 0.24 Ma from South Fiord intrusions along with geochemical similarity confirm these intrusions (including the SSE-trending dykes) are feeders for the Strand Fiord Formation lavas.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical and Legal Study of Sovereignty in the Canadian North : Terrestrial Sovereignty, 1870–1939
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository University of Calgary Press University of Calgary Press Open Access Books 2014 A historical and legal study of sovereignty in the Canadian north : terrestrial sovereignty, 1870–1939 Smith, Gordon W. University of Calgary Press "A historical and legal study of sovereignty in the Canadian north : terrestrial sovereignty, 1870–1939", Gordon W. Smith; edited by P. Whitney Lackenbauer. University of Calgary Press, Calgary, Alberta, 2014 http://hdl.handle.net/1880/50251 book http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 International Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca A HISTORICAL AND LEGAL STUDY OF SOVEREIGNTY IN THE CANADIAN NORTH: TERRESTRIAL SOVEREIGNTY, 1870–1939 By Gordon W. Smith, Edited by P. Whitney Lackenbauer ISBN 978-1-55238-774-0 THIS BOOK IS AN OPEN ACCESS E-BOOK. It is an electronic version of a book that can be purchased in physical form through any bookseller or on-line retailer, or from our distributors. Please support this open access publication by requesting that your university purchase a print copy of this book, or by purchasing a copy yourself. If you have any questions, please contact us at ucpress@ ucalgary.ca Cover Art: The artwork on the cover of this book is not open access and falls under traditional copyright provisions; it cannot be reproduced in any way without written permission of the artists and their agents. The cover can be displayed as a complete cover image for the purposes of publicizing this work, but the artwork cannot be extracted from the context of the cover of this specificwork without breaching the artist’s copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Regions Regulations Règlement Sur Les Régions R-108-98 Fauniques R-108-98
    WILDLIFE ACT LOI SUR LA FAUNE WILDLIFE REGIONS REGULATIONS RÈGLEMENT SUR LES RÉGIONS R-108-98 FAUNIQUES R-108-98 INCLUDING AMENDMENTS MADE BY MODIFIÉ PAR R-075-99 (CIF 31/08/99) R-075-99 (EEV 1999-08-31) This consolidation is not an official statement of the La présente codification administrative ne constitue pas law. It is an office consolidation prepared by le texte officiel de la loi; elle n'est établie qu'à titre Legislation Division, Department of Justice, for documentaire par les Affaires législatives du ministère convenience of reference only. The authoritative text de la Justice. Seuls les règlements contenus dans les of regulations can be ascertained from the Revised Règlements révisés des Territoires du Nord-Ouest Regulations of the Northwest Territories, 1990 and the (1990) et dans les parutions mensuelles de la Partie II monthly publication of Part II of the Northwest de la Gazette des Territoires du Nord-Ouest ont force Territories Gazette. de loi. Copies of this consolidation and other Government of On peut également obtenir des copies de la présente the Northwest Territories publications can be obtained codification et d'autres publications du gouvernement at the following address: des Territoires du Nord-Ouest en communiquant avec : Canarctic Graphics Canarctic Graphics 5102-50th Street 5102, 50e Rue P.O. Box 2758 C.P. 2758 Yellowknife NT X1A 2R1 Yellowknife NT X1A 2R1 Telephone: (867) 873-5924 Téléphone : (867) 873-5924 Fax: (867) 920-4371 Télécopieur : (867) 920-4371 WILDLIFE ACT LOI SUR LA FAUNE WILDLIFE REGIONS RÈGLEMENT SUR LES RÉGIONS REGULATIONS FAUNIQUES The Commissioner, on the recommendation of the Le commissaire, sur la recommendation du Minister, under section 98 of the Wildlife Act and every ministre, en vertu de l’article 98 de la Loi sur la faune enabling power, makes the Wildlife Regions et de tout pouvoir habilitant, prend le Règlement sur les Regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Frederick J. Krabbé, Last Man to See HMS Investigator Afloat, May 1854
    The Journal of the Hakluyt Society January 2017 Frederick J. Krabbé, last man to see HMS Investigator afloat, May 1854 William Barr1 and Glenn M. Stein2 Abstract Having ‘served his apprenticeship’ as Second Master on board HMS Assistance during Captain Horatio Austin’s expedition in search of the missing Franklin expedition in 1850–51, whereby he had made two quite impressive sledge trips, in the spring of 1852 Frederick John Krabbé was selected by Captain Leopold McClintock to serve under him as Master (navigation officer) on board the steam tender HMS Intrepid, part of Captain Sir Edward Belcher’s squadron, again searching for the Franklin expedition. After two winterings, the second off Cape Cockburn, southwest Bathurst Island, Krabbé was chosen by Captain Henry Kellett to lead a sledging party west to Mercy Bay, Banks Island, to check on the condition of HMS Investigator, abandoned by Commander Robert M’Clure, his officers and men, in the previous spring. Krabbé executed these orders and was thus the last person to see Investigator afloat. Since, following Belcher’s orders, Kellett had abandoned HMS Resolute and Intrepid, rather than their return journey ending near Cape Cockburn, Krabbé and his men had to continue for a further 140 nautical miles (260 km) to Beechey Island. This made the total length of their sledge trip 863½ nautical miles (1589 km), one of the longest man- hauled sledge trips in the history of the Arctic. Introduction On 22 July 2010 a party from the underwater archaeology division of Parks Canada flew into Mercy Bay in Aulavik National Park, on Banks Island, Northwest Territories – its mission to try to locate HMS Investigator, abandoned here by Commander Robert McClure in 1853.3 Two days later underwater archaeologists Ryan Harris and Jonathan Moore took to the water in a Zodiac to search the bay, towing a side-scan sonar towfish.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 12, 1959
    THE ARCT IC CIRCLE THE COMMITTEE 1959 Officers President: Dr. D.C. Rose Vice -Presidents Mr. L.A.C.O. Hunt Secretary: Mr. D. Snowden Treasurer: Mr. J .E. Cleland Publications Secretary: Miss Mary Murphy Editor: Mrs .G.W. Rowley Members Mr. Harvey Blandford Mr. Welland Phipps Mr. J. Cantley Mr. A. Stevenson Mr. F..A. Cate Mr. Fraser Symington L/Cdr. J.P. Croal, R.C.N. Mr. J .5. Tener Miss Moira Dunbar Dr. R. Thorsteinsson W IC K. R. Greenaway, R.C.A.F. Dr. J.S. Willis Mr. T .H. Manning Mr. J. Wyatt Mr. Elijah Menarik CONTENTS VOLUME XlI, 1959 NO.1 Meetings of the Arctic Circle 1 Officers and Committee Members for 1959 Z Research in the Lake Hazen region of northern Ellesmere Island in the International Geophysical Year Z Anthropological work in the Eastern Arctic, 1958 13 Geomorphological studies on Southampton Island, 1958 15 Bird Sanctuaries in Southampton Island 17 Subscriptions for 1959 18 Change of Address 18 Editorial Note 18 NO. Z U.S. Navy airship flight to Ice Island T3 19 Firth River archaeological activities. 1956 and 1958 Z6 A light floatplane operation in the far northern islands, 1958 Z9 Change of Address 31 Editorial Note 31 NO.3 Meetings of the Arctic Circle 3Z The Polar Continental Shelf Project, 1959 3Z Jacobsen-McGill Arctic Research Expedition to Axel Heiberg Island 38 Biological work on Prince of Wales Island in the summer of 1958 40 Geographical Branch Survey in southern Melville Peninsula, 1959 43 Pilot of Arctic Canada 48 Subsc riptions for 1960 50 Change of Address 51 • Editorial Note 51 I NO.4 Meetings of the Arctic Circle 52 Officers and Committee Members for 1960 52 Some factors regarding northern oil and gas 53 Nauyopee.
    [Show full text]
  • Wolf-Sightings on the Canadian Arctic Islands FRANK L
    ARCTIC VOL. 48, NO.4 (DECEMBER 1995) P. 313–323 Wolf-Sightings on the Canadian Arctic Islands FRANK L. MILLER1 and FRANCES D. REINTJES1 (Received 6 April 1994; accepted in revised form 13 March 1995) ABSTRACT. A wolf-sighting questionnaire was sent to 201 arctic field researchers from many disciplines to solicit information on observations of wolves (Canis lupus spp.) made by field parties on Canadian Arctic Islands. Useable responses were obtained for 24 of the 25 years between 1967 and 1991. Respondents reported 373 observations, involving 1203 wolf-sightings. Of these, 688 wolves in 234 observations were judged to be different individuals; the remaining 515 wolf-sightings in 139 observations were believed to be repeated observations of 167 of those 688 wolves. The reported wolf-sightings were obtained from 1953 field-weeks spent on 18 of 36 Arctic Islands reported on: no wolves were seen on the other 18 islands during an additional 186 field-weeks. Airborne observers made 24% of all wolf-sightings, 266 wolves in 48 packs and 28 single wolves. Respondents reported seeing 572 different wolves in 118 separate packs and 116 single wolves. Pack sizes averaged 4.8 ± 0.28 SE and ranged from 2 to 15 wolves. Sixty-three wolf pups were seen in 16 packs, with a mean of 3.9 ± 2.24 SD and a range of 1–10 pups per pack. Most (81%) of the different wolves were seen on the Queen Elizabeth Islands. Respondents annually averaged 10.9 observations of wolves ·100 field-weeks-1 and saw on average 32.2 wolves·100 field-weeks-1· yr -1 between 1967 and 1991.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Discovered the Northwest Passage? Janice Cavell1
    ARCTIC VOL. 71, NO.3 (SEPTEMBER 2018) P.292 – 308 https://doi.org/10.14430/arctic4733 Who Discovered the Northwest Passage? Janice Cavell1 (Received 31 January 2018; accepted in revised form 1 May 2018) ABSTRACT. In 1855 a parliamentary committee concluded that Robert McClure deserved to be rewarded as the discoverer of a Northwest Passage. Since then, various writers have put forward rival claims on behalf of Sir John Franklin, John Rae, and Roald Amundsen. This article examines the process of 19th-century European exploration in the Arctic Archipelago, the definition of discovering a passage that prevailed at the time, and the arguments for and against the various contenders. It concludes that while no one explorer was “the” discoverer, McClure’s achievement deserves reconsideration. Key words: Northwest Passage; John Franklin; Robert McClure; John Rae; Roald Amundsen RÉSUMÉ. En 1855, un comité parlementaire a conclu que Robert McClure méritait de recevoir le titre de découvreur d’un passage du Nord-Ouest. Depuis lors, diverses personnes ont avancé des prétentions rivales à l’endroit de Sir John Franklin, de John Rae et de Roald Amundsen. Cet article se penche sur l’exploration européenne de l’archipel Arctique au XIXe siècle, sur la définition de la découverte d’un passage en vigueur à l’époque, de même que sur les arguments pour et contre les divers prétendants au titre. Nous concluons en affirmant que même si aucun des explorateurs n’a été « le » découvreur, les réalisations de Robert McClure méritent d’être considérées de nouveau. Mots clés : passage du Nord-Ouest; John Franklin; Robert McClure; John Rae; Roald Amundsen Traduit pour la revue Arctic par Nicole Giguère.
    [Show full text]
  • Documenting Linguistic Knowledge in an Inuit Language Atlas
    Document generated on 10/01/2021 7:23 p.m. Études Inuit Studies Documenting Linguistic Knowledge in an Inuit Language Atlas Documenter les connaissances linguistiques dans un atlas en langue inuit Kumiko Murasugi and Monica Ittusardjuat Curriculum scolaire inuit Article abstract Inuit School Curriculum The traditional method of orally transmitting language is weakening with the Volume 40, Number 2, 2016 passing of fluent Elders and language erosion in contemporary Inuit society. Language documentation is a vital component of language maintenance and URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1055437ar revitalization. In this paper we present a pilot online, multimedia DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1055437ar cybercartographic Atlas of the Inuit Language in Canada, the goal of which is to help protect and strengthen the vitality of Inuit dialects through the documentation of their words. The main component of the atlas is a See table of contents multidialectal database of written and spoken words. We discuss the role of dictionaries in language documentation, introduce the features of the atlas, explore the appeal of the atlas to different types of users (in particular, Publisher(s) language learners), and present future directions for the atlas project. Centre interuniversitaire d’études et de recherches autochtones (CIÉRA) ISSN 0701-1008 (print) 1708-5268 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Murasugi, K. & Ittusardjuat, M. (2016). Documenting Linguistic Knowledge in an Inuit Language Atlas. Études Inuit Studies, 40(2), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.7202/1055437ar Tous droits réservés © La revue Études Inuit Studies, 2019 This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online.
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic Show Trial
    Documents on Canadian Arctic Sovereignty and Security ARCTIC SHOW TRIAL The Trial of Alikomiak and Tatamigana, 1923 Introduced by Ken Coates and William R. Morrison Documents Compiled by P. Whitney Lackenbauer and Kristopher Kinsinger Documents on Canadian Arctic Sovereignty and Security (DCASS) ISSN 2368-4569 Series Editors: P. Whitney Lackenbauer Adam Lajeunesse Managing Editor: Ryan Dean Arctic Show Trial: The Trial of Alikomiak and Tatamigana, 1923 Introduced by Ken Coates and William R. Morrison Documents compiled by P. Whitney Lackenbauer and Kristopher Kinsinger DCASS Number #9, 2017 Cover design: Whitney Lackenbauer Cover credits: Glenbow Archives PA-3886-29-1 (front) and PA-3886-29-6 (back). Centre for Military, Security and Centre on Foreign Policy and Federalism Strategic Studies St. Jerome’s University University of Calgary 290 Westmount Road N. 2500 University Dr. N.W. Waterloo, ON N2L 3G3 Calgary, AB T2N 1N4 Tel: 519.884.8110 ext. 28233 Tel: 403.220.4030 www.sju.ca/cfpf www.cmss.ucalgary.ca Arctic Institute of North America University of Calgary 2500 University Drive NW, ES-1040 Calgary, AB T2N 1N4 Tel: 403-220-7515 http://arctic.ucalgary.ca/ Copyright © the authors/editors, 2017 Permission policies are outlined on our website http://cmss.ucalgary.ca/research/arctic-document-series Arctic Show Trial: The Trial of Alikomiak and Tatamigana, 1923 Introduced by Ken Coates and William R. Morrison Documents compiled and edited by P. Whitney Lackenbauer and Kristopher Kinsinger The Trial of Alikomiak and Tatamigana Contents Foreword ............................................................................................................... viii Introduction “To Make These Tribes Understand”: The Trial of Alikomiak and Tatamigana, by Ken Coates and William R.
    [Show full text]