DOCSLIB.ORG

Preliminary Hydraulics Study Addendum

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Preliminary Hydraulics Study Addendum PRELIMINARY HYDRAULICS STUDY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ADDENDUM #1 – Addition of Site 1A Downstream of Site 1 in original September 17, 2014 Report SITE 1A – MIDDLE CREEK CROSSING AT SUNSET LAKE ROAD (SR 1301) TIP PROJECT NO. R-2721, R-2828 & R-2829 WAKE AND JOHNSTON COUNTIES TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY SOUTHEAST EXTENSION MULKEY, INC. 6750 Tryon Road P.O. Box 33127 Raleigh, NC 27636 (919) 851-1912 February 16, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Hydraulic Aspects of Environmental Impact II. Preliminary Design and Assessment Checklist III. Project Maps IV. Site Information (Sites 1A) Each site includes the following information (if applicable): Plan View of Site Quad Map Hydraulic/Hydrologic Design FEMA/ FIS Information Photos/Field Notes Miscellaneous I. Hydraulic Aspects of Environmental Impact HYDRAULIC ASPECTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF THE TRIANGLE EXPRESSWAY PROTECTED CORRIDOR BETWEEN NC 55 BYPASS (HOLLY SPRINGS) AND US 64 BYPASS (KNIGHTDALE). TIP PROJECT NO. R-2721, R-2828 AND R-2829 The North Carolina Turnpike Authority (NCTA) proposes to construct a multi-lane facility on new location between NC 55 in Apex and US 64/264 in Knightdale. The proposed typical section that is being considered for the project is a 6 lane median divided facility. The length of the proposed corridor is approximately 30 +/- miles. See the attached quad map for specific locations of the sites. All of the crossings are located in the Neuse River Basin. It was discovered during a recent Agency field meeting that during Functional Designs a project corridor was extended to cover the downstream crossing of Site 1. This created Site 1A, Sunset Lake Road over Middle Creek. This site was never studied in the original report, therefore, it is now being investigated as an additional site (Site 1A), as Addendum #1. The staff of Mulkey, Inc. recently conducted a field investigation and preliminary hydraulic study for the subject stream crossing. In consideration of all aspects noted below, the hydraulic recommendations are summarized as follows: Site 1A is a crossing of Middle Creek on an existing location; Sunset Lake Road. The normal water depth at the proposed site is 2.5 feet. The channel has a base width of 25 feet and a depth of 4.5 feet. Average upstream/downstream top of bank to top of bank measures approximately 35 feet. Recent drift was observed to be 5.0 feet above the stream bed. Debris potential is high and existing timber debris was noted in the upstream portion of the channel during recent site visit. The drainage area for this crossing is 3,554 acres (5.55 square miles). A majority of the area is zoned as Residential or Mixed Use. This crossing is located below headwater. Based on preliminary hydraulic analysis of this site, it is recommended that the proposed structure be a 100 foot bridge. Further detailed analysis will be required during final design in order to adequately address all the impacts associated with the floodplain. The creek is in a FEMA detailed study Special Flood Hazard Zone AE containing a published floodway. The creek is listed on the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) 303(d) list (27-43-15-(1)b1) for impaired streams. This stretch of creek is located in Class C and NSW per NCDWQ classifications for this site. Wake County participates in the National Flood Insurance Regulatory Program. Results of this study were based upon the current Effective FIRM maps for Wake County. The Hydraulics Unit will coordinate with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to determine if a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) and a subsequent final Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) are required for the project. If required, the Division will submit sealed as-built construction plans to the Hydraulics Unit upon project completion certifying the project was built as shown on construction plans. 2 Wetlands were observed sporadically through the entire corridor. NCDOT “Best Management Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters” will be utilized throughout the life of the project. Erosion and sedimentation will be controlled through the specification, installation, and maintenance of more stringent erosion and sedimentation control methods. Existing drainage patterns will be maintained to the extent practicable. Groundwater resources should not be affected by the project, as the roadway approaches are primarily on fill. Nutrient sensitive buffers are located throughout the entire project. There are no water supply watershed critical areas located downstream of this project, therefore Hazardous Spill Basins are not required for this project. It is anticipated that construction of the project will require a United States Army Corps of Engineers 404 individual permit and a 401 Water Quality Certification. 3 R-2721, R-2828, & R-2829 TriEx SUMMARY TABLE OF HYDRAULIC RECOMMENDATIONS EXISTING DA FLOOD DETAILED RECOMMENDED SITE STREAM STRUCTURE (SQ. MI.) ZONE STUDY STRUCTURE 2@142”x 91” 5.55 Yes 1A Middle Creek Yes 100’ Bridge CSPA (3,554 Ac.) (Zone AE) II. Preliminary Design and Assessment Checklist III. Project Maps IV. Site Information (Site 1A) Site 1A North Carolina 12/19/2014 PROJECT NAME: Triangle Expressway SE Ext STREAM NAME: Middle Creek REGION: BLUE RIDGE Site #1A ENGLISH Drainage Area = 5.55 sq. miles METHOD USED: Fact Sheet 007-00 USGS RURAL REGRESSION EQUATIONS (OLD) RURAL EQUATIONS Report 01-4207 FREQUENCY Sand Hills Coastal Plain Blue Ridge FREQUENCY Blue Ridge Coastal Plain Sand Hills (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 2YR 104.31 205.00 470.62 2YR 449.60 205.03 113.50 5YR 172.87 403.98 781.86 5YR 772.15 383.01 184.52 10YR 228.91 586.47 1044.00 10YR 1038.65 539.38 240.71 25YR 312.23 900.89 1434.92 25YR 1437.73 776.38 321.71 50YR 384.25 1182.40 1769.97 50YR 1787.40 989.95 392.18 100YR 465.87 1530.48 2164.26 100YR 2174.40 1234.57 464.95 200YR 574.08 1956.41 2600.89 200YR 2609.58 1514.38 550.85 500YR 694.24 2635.72 3286.80 500YR 3271.56 1946.94 678.13 USGS URBAN REGRESSION EQUATIONS BDF= 11 ( These Equations are used only for comparison) FREQUENCY Sand Hills Coastal Plain Blue Ridge (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 5YR 602.35 1167.88 1954.67 10YR 712.90 1499.02 2364.13 25YR 877.79 2049.04 2973.56 50YR 1033.03 2567.49 3559.78 100YR 1229.65 3261.09 4332.70 200YR 1996.13 4197.26 6619.55 (Based on 2.80xQ10) 500YR 1706.62 5096.07 6107.34 NC REGRESSION EQUATIONS (% Impervious) USGS Fact Sheet 007-00 % Impervious = 45 FEMA FREQUENCY Sand Hills Coastal Plain Blue Ridge Discharge Used FREQUENCY Disharges (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 5YR 1452.53 1848.99 2236.55 10YR 1713.22 2259.51 2662.42 10YR 1050 25YR 2029.25 2918.73 3415.85 50YR 2150 50YR 2286.84 3289.62 3749.97 3700 100YR 2800 100YR 2495.83 3621.47 4037.27 500YR 5200 200YR 4797.01 6326.62 7454.77 (Based on 2.80xQ10) 500YR 6270.38 8269.80 9744.45 (Based on 3.66xQ10) 2050000 FEET 2060000 FEET 710000 FEET 78°49'30"W 78°49'0"W 78°48'30"W 78°48'0"W 710000 FEET E a r t n h L D n r o d 35°42'0"N 35°42'0"N n r e H Dezola St T A reys Ct l l e n h u r s T t im P pa l ZONE AE ni Tr l F am il y C ir cle Rd r D r n D o i e d s s s a l R l h i u C c M r s e g Middle n Millsford Hill Pl g P li n l i i Creek r h e S v Ct e s L Drexel Hill Ct ak O r o Bobbitt Rd o m n Wayfield Ln h L t k u l a Satori Way o t S W C y Concerto e l TOWN OF Smith Rd s n APEX ETJ A 370467 TOWN OF Denham Walk Ct Morganford Pl Dr APEX ETJ se ha y C 370467 lb Co O Rh r yth c m h Dr e s t r a C t October Glory Ln Chaswold Ct 35°41'30"N Ferrington Ct 35°41'30"N S um m e ning Mist Ct r Trackimire Ln Mor R Dinsorette Ln id Lorry Ln Moss MountainLn g Lacuna Woods Ln e Alpharetta Trl C Str Lianfair L t ayw n hit Brook Cross Dr e A Hearn Ct v Peachstone Ct e Derry Down Ln TOWN t Co C ckle r Burr Dr OF CARY e f i n Park D n on r i 370238 ni u M e F Merion Station Dr n R o L r r r Reunion Arb o y m Rig Geoffrey Ct hters Mi a ll W Stephenson Rd s ay y Daysprings Ct t a T W Turnbuckle Ct r l d r y o a R f e Storemont Way t s e W u Bizzell Ct e g n d i i n o W R L n High Ramble Ln n s io w W n o Inkberry Ct eu oods Tr R d l a e M n R o Little White Pine Ct i e n u d n Portwind Ln n Gallent Hedge Trl L io u R Ballytore Dr n Crossvine Ct C e e R R a re n e e z k u a Fargale Ln Carlotta Ct o P n l Presenteer Trl t k io P s y n H y a r rd r e Lynnford Dr ZONE AE nri e d h ge r C C t D k o TOWN OF o r b y TOWN OF l APEX l od Dr Tear Drop C ir o Thriftwo 370467 APEX ETJ H t n 370467 WAKE COUNTY C L Rollsby Ct y e e v UNINCORPORATED AREAS n o r e D Co P g ralb 370368 n S er i ry r u C p n i s r S Dr D ven h o Ha i ves n e C r r e D s t t es C cr t rn Middle Creek ho r T D p a c d S 35°41'0"N 35°41'0"N n t i o n Arro W whe Ba e a Weeping Oak Ct d D nview Ln c r r e H e olly k hock Ln D Kildee Ct r Monarc t h Birch C Dr e t a Ness Dr G s le b n a Lindell Dr G L e Lockett Ln n Ct i lsby R P oo id G g s e g L a n k i e K D Greycrest Ct r Butt C erbiggins Ln olonia l Oa ks Dr Craig Dr Shadow Mist Ct Stargazer Ct r D 2488 t i s Florians Dr D e u r o t n c F B r L Jasmine Rose Ct h Ci k a E t y c is l l Hi M l e m a ghland y l 351.2 l l B S a Dr han non V r Way h D c r e o Misty Lake St D t n n s Sunset Lake Rd i TOWN OF HOLLY e n Hazelmere Dr r o o G y P n m a t L SPRINGS A e m W s d w o r D k n e d o C r Gingerlilly Ct o u f F o d 370403 air a i f w o S e n r a d to P l s e e d D R y r M r L u e Osterville Dr b i l n rm P z F w Sto e n g i in r n e e N v e E k f c l y M R d Logans Call Ct Heritage Meadows Ln Meadows Heritage Fountain Springs Rd Dr TOWN OF ds ar Riley Oaks Ln w Danesway Dr ZONE AE d HOLLY SPRINGS E Dr r s r D ni 370403 o n D i a lag y s el H l l B Turner Dr a TOWN OF HOLLY F r ermo C e l t r C a Arbor Creek D v SPRINGS ETJ P i ap R r 370403 i Dr t C Holmby Ct TOWN OF HOLLY w Ct e o t l l a a 35°40'30"N 35°40'30"N g M s SPRINGS G C p r o o WAKE COUNTY e o e h s 370403 k S Hav e UNINCORPORATED AREAS en Dr b e r r B y o t 370368 t l e D r r b D t e r h Ct lo C t us el a p Middle Creek a g C f a e 700000 FEET L 700000 FEET 78°49'30"W 78°49'0"W 78°48'30"W 78°48'0"W 2050000 FEET 2060000 FEET This digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) was produced through a unique cooperative partnership between the State of North Carolina and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 15A NCAC 02B .0315 NEUSE RIVER BASIN (A) Classifications Assigned
    15A NCAC 02B .0315 NEUSE RIVER BASIN (a) Classifications assigned to the waters within the Neuse River Basin are set forth in the Neuse River Basin Classification Schedule, which may be inspected at the following places: (1) the Internet at https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/water-planning/classification- standards/river-basin-classification; and (2) the following offices of the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality: (A) Raleigh Regional Office 3800 Barrett Drive Raleigh, North Carolina; (B) Washington Regional Office 943 Washington Square Mall Washington, North Carolina; (C) Wilmington Regional Office 127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington, North Carolina; and (D) Division of Water Resources Central Office 512 North Salisbury Street Raleigh, North Carolina. (b) The Neuse River Basin Classification Schedule was amended effective: (1) March 1, 1977 see Paragraph (c) of this Rule; (2) December 13, 1979 see Paragraph (d) of this Rule; (3) September 14, 1980 see Paragraph (e) of this Rule; (4) August 9, 1981 see Paragraph (f) of this Rule; (5) January 1, 1982 see Paragraph (g) of this Rule; (6) April 1, 1982 see Paragraph (h) of this Rule; (7) December 1, 1983 see Paragraph (i) of this Rule; (8) January 1, 1985 see Paragraph (j) of this Rule; (9) August 1, 1985 see Paragraph (k) of this Rule; (10) February 1, 1986 see Paragraph (l) of this Rule; (11) May 1, 1988 see Paragraph (m) of this Rule; (12) July 1, 1988 see Paragraph (n) of this Rule; (13) October 1, 1988 see Paragraph (o) of this Rule; (14) January 1,
    [Show full text]
  • Adopted Capital Improvement Program Fy2019-Fy2023
    STRATEGIC INVESTMENT IN INFRASTRUCTURE ADOPTED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY2019-FY2023 Raleigh BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Capital Improvement Program FY2019 to FY2023 City of Raleigh, North Carolina Adopted by the City Council ................................................................................................................... June 11, 2018 Recommended to the City Council by the City Manager ........................................................................ May 15, 2018 The City Council Nancy McFarlane, Mayor Corey D. Branch, Mayor Pro Tem Kay Crowder David N. Cox Stef Mendell Russ Stephenson Nicole Stewart Richard A. “Dickie” Thompson Executive Staff Ruffin L. Hall ....................................................................................................................................................... City Manager Marchell Adams David ........................................................................................................................ Assistant City Manager James S. Greene, Jr. .......................................................................................................................... Assistant City Manager Tansy Hayward ................................................................................................................................... Assistant City Manager Louis Buonpane .................................................................................................................................................. Chief of Staff Allison
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Management and All Class SA Waters
    Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. July 19, 2019 Subchapter 2B – Surface Water and Wetland Standards, Section .0300 – Assignment of Stream Classifications Effective June 20, 2019 The attached WQS document is in effect for Clean Water Act (CWA) purposes with the exceptions below: • On July 24, 2018, the EPA disapproved the first sentence of the provision at 15A NCAC 02B .0311(t), which states “The Schedule of Classifications and Water Quality Standards for the Cape Fear River Basin was amended effective June 30, 2017 with the reclassification of a section of 18-(71) from upstream mouth of Toomers Creek to a line across the river between Lilliput Creek and Snows Cut from Class SC to Class SC Sw.” o The default Class SC designation remains in effect for CWA purposes. • On March 18, 2009, the EPA disapproved the last sentence of the provision at 15A NCAC 02B .0308(v), which states “Between the last day of May and the first day of November the water quality standard for dissolved oxygen shall not be less than a daily average of 5.0 mg/l with a minimum instantaneous value of not less than 4.0 mg/l.” SECTION .0300 - ASSIGNMENT OF STREAM CLASSIFICATIONS 15A NCAC 02B .0301 CLASSIFICATIONS: GENERAL (a) Schedule of Classifications.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 City of Raleigh Data Book
    City of Raleigh Data Book 2015 Chapter 1: Introduction of the Raleigh Data Book The Raleigh Data Book is an annual publication of updated community information collected by City of Raleigh Department of City Planning staff. The Data Book builds upon the larger, more comprehensive “Community Inventory Report: Background Studies for the Comprehensive Plan” published in 2008. The Community Inventory Report remains the analytical basis for the City of Raleigh’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan and is accessible on-line: http://www.raleighnc.gov/cp Annual Updates of City Data: Raleigh Data Book The City of Raleigh 2030 Comprehensive Plan, adopted in November 2009, provides implementation instructions regarding the monitoring of existing conditions (Action Item IM 3.3). More specifically, Action Item IM 3.4, “Data Book Updates”, states that data in the report will be updated every year. The Raleigh Data Book is published online in conjunction with population estimates conducted by city staff that occurs in January each year. It focuses on topical areas of the Community Inventory Report which have been reviewed through comprehensive planning initiatives during the previous calendar year, with a data benchmark point of December 31st whenever possible. All figures and tables are for the city of Raleigh corporate limits unless otherwise specified. The 2015 Raleigh Data Book updates and/or accompanies the following Community Inventory Report chapters and correlated to 2015 Data Book chapters. Raleigh Data Book 2015 Community Inventory Chapter Page Chapter Numbers 1. Introduction 1 1 2. Demographics & Household Trends 2 5 3. Land Use & Zoning 3 17 4. Economic Development & Employment Trends 4 24 5.
    [Show full text]
  • To the Real Estate Maps of Clarence Lamb Mann
    Index to the Real Estate Maps of Clarence Lamb Mann Primarily Encompassing the City of Raleigh and Wake County, North Carolina (1893 – 1960) Compiled by Charles P. Blunt IV INTRODUCTION From time to time, one “discovers” sources of significant historical value which cannot be utilized in an efficient matter. Such is the case with the set of more than 2,000 maps in the office the Wake County Register of Deeds donated by C.L. Mann after his death in 1961. The greatest majority of these maps encompass the City of Raleigh and Wake County from the 1890’s to 1960. There are a surprising number of maps ranging from the mountains to the coast and in neighboring localities. Below is a photograph that appeared in the 1924 Agromeck (North Carolina State Yearbook) and shows Professor C.L. Mann (about 46 years of age). Behind him is the map cabinet which he donated to Wake County. It contains over 2,000 maps accumulated during this long career. I would like to thank the office of the Register of Deeds of Wake County for allowing me full access to these records, especially Delia Little and her management. Charlie Blunt October, 2016 CONTENTS OF BOOKLET Introduction Contents Access to Maps Tips to Utilize C.L. Mann Real Estate Maps Biography of Carroll Lamb Mann (1877-1961) Arrangement and Highlights of Each Map Drawer Master Index of Names and Places in C.L. Mann Maps Title of Maps in Each Drawer ACCESS TO MAPS This document is intended to be used in conjunction with the C.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Boulevard Bridge Finding of No Significant Impact
    Replacement of Bridge Nos. 227 & 213 on Capital Boulevard (US 70/US 401/NC 50) At Peace Street and Wade Avenue (US 70/NC 50) and Revise the Interchanges Wake County WBS No. 42263.1.1 Federal-Aid Project BRNHS-0070(119)/BRSTP-0070(149) TIP Project B-5121/B-5317 FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration And North Carolina Department of Transportation Division of Highways Submitted pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act 42 U.S.C4332(2)(c) APPROVED: 9/J?/;y Date 1 L) Richard W. Ha~ock~ nager rtJz..._ Project Development and Environmental Analysis North Carolina Department of Transportation Date UW"- John F. Sullivan Ill, P.E., Division Administrator Federal Highway Administration Replacement of Bridge Nos. 227 & 213 on Capital Boulevard (US 70/US 401/NC 50) At Peace Street and Wade Avenue (US 70/NC 50) and Revise the Interchanges Wake County WBS No. 42263.1.1 Federal-Aid Project BRNHS-0070(119)/BRSTP-0070(149) TIP Project B-5121/B-5317 FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT Document Prepared in the Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch with Kim ley-Horn and Associates, Inc. September 2014 qfzq/ltj Date Ahmad AI-Sharawneh, Project Planning Engineer Project Development and Environmental Analysis North Carolina Department of Transportation £ p Derrick Weaver, P.E., Proje ngineer I' tJ "-- Project Development and Environmental Analysis North Carolina Department of Transportation '1 /Z-'i/1'-( Date Teresa Gresham, P.E., Project Manager Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. PROJECT COMMITMENTS Replacement of Bridge Nos. 227 & 213 on Capital Boulevard (US 70/US 401/NC 50) At Peace Street and Wade Avenue (US 70/NC 50) and Revise the Interchanges Wake County WBS No.
    [Show full text]
  • Subchapter 2B ‐ Surface Water and Wetland Standards Sections .0100 – .0300
    Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. August 7, 2020 Subchapter 2B ‐ Surface Water and Wetland Standards Sections .0100 – .0300 Effective April 9, 2020 The attached WQS document is in effect for Clean Water Act (CWA) purposes with the exceptions below: • On July 24, 2018, EPA disapproved the following phrase of the provision at 15A NCAC 02B .0227(b)(2), which states “A part of the Cape Fear River (Cape Fear River Basin) comprised of a section of Index No. 18‐(71) from upstream mouth of Toomers Creek to a line across the river between Lilliput Creek and Snows Cut shall be protected by the Class SC Sw standards as well as the follow site‐specific action.” o The default Class SC designation remains in effect for CWA purposes. • On July 24, 2018, EPA disapproved the following sentence of the provision at 15A NCAC 02B .0227(b)(2)(C), which states “Any new or expanded permitted pollutant discharge of oxygen consuming waste shall not cause the dissolved oxygen of the receiving water to drop more than 0.1 mg/l below the modeled in‐stream dissolved oxygen at total permitted capacity for all discharges.” o The criteria associated with the Class SC designation remains in effect for CWA purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • 15A NCAC 02B .0200 Or to Conform with Applicable State Or Federal Requirements
    SUBCHAPTER 02B - SURFACE WATER AND WETLAND STANDARDS SECTION .0100 - PROCEDURES FOR ASSIGNMENT OF WATER QUALITY STANDARDS 15A NCAC 02B .0101 GENERAL PROCEDURES (a) The rules contained in Sections .0100, .0200 and .0300 of this Subchapter, which pertain to the series of classifications and water quality standards, shall be known as the "Classifications and Water Quality Standards Applicable to the Surface Waters and Wetlands of North Carolina." (b) The Environmental Management Commission (hereinafter referred to as the Commission), prior to classifying and assigning standards of water quality to any waters of the State, shall proceed as follows: (1) The Commission, or its designee, shall determine waters to be studied for the purpose of classification and assignment of water quality standards on the basis of user requests, petitions, or the identification of existing or attainable water uses, as defined by Rule .0202 of this Subchapter, not presently included in the water classification. (2) In determining the best usage of waters and assigning classifications of such waters, the Commission shall consider the criteria specified in G.S. 143-214.1(d). In determining whether to revise a designated best usage for waters through a revision to the classifications, the Commission shall follow the requirements of 40 CFR 131.10 which is incorporated by reference including subsequent amendments and editions. A copy of the most current version of the requirements is available free of charge at https://www.govinfo.gov. (3) When revising the classification of waters, the Division shall collect water quality data within the watershed for those substances that require more stringent control than required by the existing classification.
    [Show full text]
  • Stormwater Management Plan
    City of Raleigh Stormwater Management Plan Permit No. NCS000245 - Updated February 2021 - Final - Prepared by: Brown and Caldwell 1 City of Raleigh NC - Permit No. NCS000245 Updated February 2021 Table of Contents Revision Log .................................................................................................................................................. 5 Certification................................................................................................................................................... 6 Section 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 7 Section 2: MS4 Information .......................................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Permitted MS4 Area.............................................................................................................. 9 2.2 Existing MS4 Mapping ......................................................................................................... 10 2.3 Receiving Waters ................................................................................................................ 10 2.4 MS4 Interconnection .......................................................................................................... 14 2.5 Total Maximum Daily Loads ................................................................................................ 14 2.6 Industrial Facility Discharges..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]