<<

Running Header: CASE STUDY 1

EDCI 531 Case Study Assignment Example #1, Behaviorism

Monica Giannobile Purdue University BEHAVIORISM CASE STUDY 2

1 Description

2 ABC Learning is an after-school tutoring program for students in grades 3-8. It runs from

3 4-8 p.m. and is held in the community rooms of four libraries across Austin, Texas. It’s free for

4 parents to enroll their students in the program and the tutoring services are provided by

5 volunteers from the community, along with a program staff consisting of a full-time director and

6 three part-time program coordinators. The director and coordinators are trained in education, but

7 volunteers are not required to have an education background. The program supports its

8 volunteers by providing an onboarding session during which they receive resources about basic

9 tutoring practices. Additionally, a trained program specialist is onsite during each tutoring

10 session to provide support as needed.

11 Each enrolled student receives one hour of tutoring from the same volunteer each week

12 during a school semester. At any given time during program hours, there are 4-8 tutoring

13 sessions being held simultaneously within each library community room. At the outset of each

14 semester, the tutor and student agree to a set of behavior rules for participating in the tutoring

15 session, such as being respectful of others and agreeing to pay attention. They also jointly

16 develop a set of learning objectives to guide their work throughout the semester.

17 The program is experiencing a few problems. Despite the rules established at the outset,

18 some students are not engaged in the tutoring sessions. For example, they forget to bring their

19 homework to the session, don’t engage with their tutor’s questions or, in the worst cases, are

20 disruptive of others in the tutoring area. Despite the initial training and onsite support available

21 to them, tutors are frequently ill-equipped to manage such student issues. It’s often hard for them

22 to recall the appropriate strategy in the moment as they’re working with students. Also, the

23 onsite program coordinator is often distracted due to the need to manage so many volunteers and BEHAVIORISM CASE STUDY 3

24 simultaneously. Additionally, in many cases, tutors and learners set goals for the semester that

25 they are unsuccessful in meeting. Potential causes of this include rarely referring to their

26 objectives from the beginning of the semester or the tutor not being knowledgeable enough in

27 how to guide students toward their objectives. For example, a student may set out to improve his

28 or her grade in social studies. When that doesn’t occur despite the student’s efforts in the tutoring

29 sessions, it results in discouragement for both the student and the tutor.

30 Reflective Questions

31 • How might behavioral principles be applied in this situation to strengthen desirable

32 behavior and weaken undesirable behavior for students? For tutors?

33 • How might behavioral principles be applied in this situation to help both students and

34 learners acquire new behaviors?

35 • How might behavioral principles be used to maintain desired behavior once it’s

36 established?

37 • From a behavioral perspective, what are the potential negative impacts of punishment?

38 Are any of those negative impacts present in this example?

39 Potential Solutions

40 In this situation, behavioral tactics for strengthening or maintaining desired behavior are

41 minimal for both students and volunteers. For students, reinforcement could be used to

42 strengthen and maintain adherence to the tutoring behavior rules which, from a behavioral

43 perspective, could also be called a group contingency (Driscoll, 57).

44 One way to strengthen student adherence to the group contingency could be for the

45 program coordinators to establish a token economy at the beginning of each year (Driscoll,

46 57). For the first half of the semester, students could earn tokens from their tutors regularly as BEHAVIORISM CASE STUDY 4

47 a reward for adherence. At the halfway point, they’d be able to trade tokens for a prize from a

48 toy chest filled with items of interest to the students like stickers, books or small toys. This

49 would allow students to receive positive reinforcement continuously, which is necessary to

50 strengthen a response (Driscoll, 49). While continuous reinforcement is needed to establish a

51 behavior, it is not needed to maintain that behavior (Driscoll, 49). To this end, for the second

52 half of the semester, the program coordinator could announce an adjustment to the token

53 system. Instead of earning tokens continuously, the students would only be eligible to earn

54 one token at the end of each tutoring session. That token could be used as admission to a

55 pizza party planned for the end of the semester. In this way, the coordinator would be

56 maintaining the behavior using what Driscoll (2005) describes as the behavioral principles of

57 a fixed interval reinforcement schedule (50) and a response-cost reinforcement strategy (43).

58 For volunteers who need to learn how to apply tutoring best practices, a potential solution

59 that makes use of behavioral principles might be to split the initial onboarding training into a

60 series of modules that are delivered at the rate of one per week over the first half of the

61 semester. Volunteers would need to put the principles from each module into place during

62 their tutoring sessions each week and then relay their experience to the program coordinator,

63 who could either validate or correct the volunteer, then provide praise and award him or her

64 permission to move to the next week’s module. At the end of the semester, the volunteers

65 could receive a certificate of training completion. The praise and certificate would be

66 example of positive reinforcement (Driscoll, 37) of the desired behavior. This behavior might

67 be maintained during the second half of the semester by allowing the tutor to set

68 collaborative goals with the student and then providing an addition to the training certificate

69 each time the tutor is able to help a student meet the goals they established together. BEHAVIORISM CASE STUDY 5

References

Driscoll, M.P. (2005). of learning for instruction (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson

Education. Running Header: SCHEMA THEORY CASE STUDY 1

EDCI 531 Case Study Assignment Example #2, Schema Theory

Monica Giannobile Purdue University SCHEMA THEORY CASE STUDY 2

1 Description

2 ABC Learning is an after-school tutoring program for students in grades 3-8. It runs from

3 4-8 p.m. and is held in the community rooms of four libraries across Austin, Texas. It’s free for

4 parents to enroll their students in the program and the tutoring services are provided by

5 volunteers from the community, along with a program staff consisting of a full-time director and

6 three part-time program coordinators. The director and coordinators are trained in education, but

7 volunteers are not required to have an education background. The program supports its

8 volunteers by providing an onboarding session during which they receive resources about basic

9 tutoring practices. Additionally, a trained program specialist is onsite during each tutoring

10 session to provide support as needed.

11 The program is experiencing a few problems. One key problem is that, in many cases,

12 tutors and learners set goals for the semester that they are unsuccessful in meeting. One reason

13 for this is that, in some cases, the tutor is not knowledgeable enough about either education

14 practices or a content area. As such, they struggle to guide students toward their objectives. For

15 example, one sixth-grade student expressed to a tutor that she wanted to set a goal of

16 understanding the human reproductive process as outlined in her sexual education course. The

17 tutor checked with the trained program specialist to make sure this was an appropriate topic, and

18 was advised to proceed independently. The tutor then asked the student to share her course

19 textbook, which included a number of diagrams showing the various components of human

20 sexual organs. Based on this – and on personal memories of learning about sexual reproduction

21 through novels – the tutor decided on a course of action involving completing biology diagrams

22 from the student’s textbook and reading excerpts from a fictional young novel about dating.

23 Despite completing these activities, at the end of the semester, the student remained confused BEHAVIORISM CASE STUDY 3

24 about the reproductive process and did not improve her grades in her sexual education course at

25 school.

26 Reflective Questions

27 • In the scenario described, does the tutor have enough information to ascertain the

28 learner’s mental model of sexual reproduction? If not, what actions can the tutor take to

29 determine the student’s mental model?

30 • Human sexual reproduction is an uncomfortable topic of discussion for most people. Is it

31 likely that this impacted the mental model of the student? If so, why and what are some

32 ways to mitigate the impacts?

33 • How might the tutor go about developing a pedagogical or conceptual model that’s

34 specific to the student and her goals?

35 • Why do you think working with the textbook diagrams and young adult novel excerpts

36 failed to help the student achieve her goals?

37 Potential Solutions

38 In this situation, the program coordinator and tutor could have worked jointly to develop

39 a plan of action, rather than leaving the tutor to determine a plan of action independently.

40 Had this been the case, it’s more likely that the tutor’s intervention would have aligned with

41 an educational theory rather than being driven by the availability of resources and the tutor’s

42 own personal experiences. In this particular scenario, schema theory could have been

43 applied when determining an approach to assist the student. It’s applicable here because

44 helping the student understand the new of sexual reproduction could be facilitated by

45 understanding and supplementing her existing schema on this topic. BEHAVIORISM CASE STUDY 4

46 In applying schema theory to this situation, the first step could have been for the tutor and

47 coordinator to assess the student’s existing mental model of sexual reproduction by asking

48 her to explain it or by providing her with a related scenario that would give her the

49 opportunity to predict an outcome (Driscoll, 146). Once the tutor and coordinator became

50 familiar with the student’s current understanding of sexual reproduction, the next step could

51 have been to help her adjust her current schema related to sexual reproduction – or acquire a

52 new one – through accretion, tuning, or restructuring (Driscoll, 136). This might have been

53 accomplished by developing materials, such as advance organizers, that activated the

54 student’s prior knowledge and drew clear connections between the content to be learned and

55 what the student already knew (Driscoll, 137-138). Incorporating an item like an advanced

56 organizer along with the biology worksheets might have helped the student draw more of a

57 connection between the diagrams and her current understanding of how sexual reproduction

58 works.

59 In addition to an advance organizer, another approach the tutor and coordinator could

60 have used is to have created textual examples that provided the student with schema signals

61 to help her draw connections between the text and her prior knowledge (Driscoll, 143). In

62 this case, the student may have been better able to understand how excerpts from a young

63 adult novel relate to sexual reproduction.

64 Finally, by incorporating performances of action related to sexual reproduction, the tutor

65 and coordinator could have helped refine the student’s sexual reproduction schema while

66 simultaneously helping her hone her problem-solving skills, which she could then apply to

67 other topics (Driscoll, 148). SCHEMA THEORY CASE STUDY 5

References

Driscoll, M.P. (2005). Psychology of learning for instruction (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson

Education.