DOCSLIB.ORG

Table 5 - Areas in Multiple States

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Table 5 - Areas in Multiple States Table 5 - Areas in Multiple States * Unit is in two or more States + Special Area that is part of a proclaimed National Forest Unit Name State NFS Acreage Other Acreage Total Acreage Apache National Forest* Arizona 1,195,318 28,328 1,223,646 New Mexico 610,047 36,010 646,057 Apache National Forest* Totals 1,805,365 64,338 1,869,703 Ashley National Forest* Utah 1,282,445 14,288 1,296,733 Wyoming 96,012 8,514 104,526 Ashley National Forest* Totals 1,378,457 22,802 1,401,259 Bitterroot National Forest* Idaho 467,536 242 467,778 Montana 1,127,124 69,553 1,196,677 Bitterroot National Forest* Totals 1,594,660 69,795 1,664,455 Black Hills National Forest* South Dakota 1,074,884 260,037 1,334,921 Wyoming 175,967 26,632 202,599 Black Hills National Forest* Totals 1,250,851 286,669 1,537,520 Black Kettle National Grassland* Oklahoma 30,688 1,838 32,526 Texas 577 0 577 Black Kettle National Grassland* Totals 31,265 1,838 33,103 Cache National Forest* Idaho 263,739 531 264,270 Utah 436,861 516,874 953,735 Cache National Forest* Totals 700,600 517,405 1,218,005 Caribou National Forest* Idaho 971,019 94,638 1,065,657 Utah 7,095 1,970 9,065 Wyoming 7,785 1,942 9,727 Caribou National Forest* Totals 985,899 98,550 1,084,449 Cherokee National Forest* North Carolina 328 0 328 Tennessee 657,956 569,087 1,227,043 Cherokee National Forest* Totals 658,284 569,087 1,227,371 Coronado National Forest* Arizona 1,651,807 61,869 1,713,676 New Mexico 68,127 2,940 71,067 Coronado National Forest* Totals 1,719,934 64,809 1,784,743 2018 Land Areas Report Refresh Date: 10/13/2018 Table 5 - Areas in Multiple States * Unit is in two or more States + Special Area that is part of a proclaimed National Forest Unit Name State NFS Acreage Other Acreage Total Acreage Custer National Forest* Montana 1,115,653 88,203 1,203,856 South Dakota 73,887 4,302 78,189 Custer National Forest* Totals 1,189,540 92,505 1,282,045 Eldorado National Forest* California 702,685 190,966 893,651 Nevada 56 0 56 Eldorado National Forest* Totals 702,741 190,966 893,707 George Washington National Forest* Virginia 960,878 677,901 1,638,779 West Virginia 106,363 52,016 158,379 George Washington National Forest* Totals 1,067,241 729,917 1,797,158 Inyo National Forest* California 1,843,964 105,887 1,949,851 Nevada 113,551 5,040 118,591 Inyo National Forest* Totals 1,957,515 110,927 2,068,442 Jefferson National Forest* Kentucky 878 53,712 54,590 Virginia 707,331 907,478 1,614,809 West Virginia 19,192 11,566 30,758 Jefferson National Forest* Totals 727,401 972,756 1,700,157 Kaniksu National Forest* Idaho 902,763 212,921 1,115,684 Montana 457,175 35,630 492,805 Washington 267,371 115,157 382,528 Kaniksu National Forest* Totals 1,627,309 363,708 1,991,017 Klamath National Forest* California 1,645,676 202,479 1,848,155 Oregon 26,809 231 27,040 Klamath National Forest* Totals 1,672,485 202,710 1,875,195 Kootenai National Forest* Idaho 46,624 20 46,644 Montana 1,763,680 343,252 2,106,932 Kootenai National Forest* Totals 1,810,304 343,272 2,153,576 Land Between the Lakes Other* Kentucky 107,466 39 107,505 Tennessee 63,776 0 63,776 Land Between the Lakes Other* Totals 171,242 39 171,281 2018 Land Areas Report Refresh Date: 10/13/2018 Table 5 - Areas in Multiple States * Unit is in two or more States + Special Area that is part of a proclaimed National Forest Unit Name State NFS Acreage Other Acreage Total Acreage Manti-La Sal National Forest* Colorado 27,051 41 27,092 Utah 1,243,067 67,544 1,310,611 Manti-La Sal National Forest* Totals 1,270,118 67,585 1,337,703 Ouachita National Forest* Arkansas 1,430,651 583,558 2,014,209 Oklahoma 353,235 356,969 710,204 Ouachita National Forest* Totals 1,783,886 940,527 2,724,413 Rita Blanca National Grassland* Oklahoma 15,655 241 15,896 Texas 77,366 865 78,231 Rita Blanca National Grassland* Totals 93,021 1,106 94,127 Rogue River National Forest* California 51,578 6,679 58,257 Oregon 577,493 50,122 627,615 Rogue River National Forest* Totals 629,071 56,801 685,872 Sawtooth National Forest* Idaho 1,731,187 69,389 1,800,576 Utah 71,845 20,319 92,164 Sawtooth National Forest* Totals 1,803,032 89,708 1,892,740 Siskiyou National Forest* California 31,543 5,923 37,466 Oregon 1,058,526 66,338 1,124,864 Siskiyou National Forest* Totals 1,090,069 72,261 1,162,330 Targhee National Forest* Idaho 1,307,036 49,925 1,356,961 Wyoming 332,338 2,215 334,553 Targhee National Forest* Totals 1,639,374 52,140 1,691,514 Toiyabe National Forest* California 645,700 47,939 693,639 Nevada 3,246,246 298,146 3,544,392 Toiyabe National Forest* Totals 3,891,946 346,085 4,238,031 Umatilla National Forest* Oregon 1,095,441 97,414 1,192,855 Washington 311,035 8,014 319,049 Umatilla National Forest* Totals 1,406,476 105,428 1,511,904 Wallowa National Forest* Idaho 4,660 0 4,660 Oregon 994,445 70,448 1,064,893 Wallowa National Forest* Totals 999,105 70,448 1,069,553 2018 Land Areas Report Refresh Date: 10/13/2018 Table 5 - Areas in Multiple States * Unit is in two or more States + Special Area that is part of a proclaimed National Forest Unit Name State NFS Acreage Other Acreage Total Acreage Wasatch National Forest* Utah 876,572 154,671 1,031,243 Wyoming 37,706 9,906 47,612 Wasatch National Forest* Totals 914,278 164,577 1,078,855 White Mountain National Forest* Maine 42,521 10,673 53,194 New Hampshire 724,609 91,964 816,573 White Mountain National Forest* Totals 767,130 102,637 869,767 White Mountain Purchase Unit* Maine 7,675 21,799 29,474 New Hampshire 29,312 5,519 34,831 White Mountain Purchase Unit* Totals 36,987 27,318 64,305 2018 Land Areas Report Refresh Date: 10/13/2018.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2021 to 06/30/2021 Boise National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2021 to 06/30/2021 Boise National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring Nationwide Gypsy Moth Management in the - Vegetation management Completed Actual: 11/28/2012 01/2013 Susan Ellsworth United States: A Cooperative (other than forest products) 775-355-5313 Approach [email protected]. EIS us *UPDATED* Description: The USDA Forest Service and Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service are analyzing a range of strategies for controlling gypsy moth damage to forests and trees in the United States. Web Link: http://www.na.fs.fed.us/wv/eis/ Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Nationwide. Locatable Mining Rule - 36 CFR - Regulations, Directives, In Progress: Expected:12/2021 12/2021 Sarah Shoemaker 228, subpart A. Orders NOI in Federal Register 907-586-7886 EIS 09/13/2018 [email protected] d.us *UPDATED* Est. DEIS NOA in Federal Register 03/2021 Description: The U.S. Department of Agriculture proposes revisions to its regulations at 36 CFR 228, Subpart A governing locatable minerals operations on National Forest System lands.A draft EIS & proposed rule should be available for review/comment in late 2020 Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=57214 Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - Not Applicable. These regulations apply to all NFS lands open to mineral entry under the US mining laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Areas of the National Forest System, As of September 30, 2019
    United States Department of Agriculture Land Areas of the National Forest System As of September 30, 2019 Forest Service WO Lands FS-383 November 2019 Metric Equivalents When you know: Multiply by: To fnd: Inches (in) 2.54 Centimeters Feet (ft) 0.305 Meters Miles (mi) 1.609 Kilometers Acres (ac) 0.405 Hectares Square feet (ft2) 0.0929 Square meters Yards (yd) 0.914 Meters Square miles (mi2) 2.59 Square kilometers Pounds (lb) 0.454 Kilograms United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Land Areas of the WO, Lands National Forest FS-383 System November 2019 As of September 30, 2019 Published by: USDA Forest Service 1400 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20250-0003 Website: https://www.fs.fed.us/land/staff/lar-index.shtml Cover Photo: Mt. Hood, Mt. Hood National Forest, Oregon Courtesy of: Susan Ruzicka USDA Forest Service WO Lands and Realty Management Statistics are current as of: 10/17/2019 The National Forest System (NFS) is comprised of: 154 National Forests 58 Purchase Units 20 National Grasslands 7 Land Utilization Projects 17 Research and Experimental Areas 28 Other Areas NFS lands are found in 43 States as well as Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. TOTAL NFS ACRES = 192,994,068 NFS lands are organized into: 9 Forest Service Regions 112 Administrative Forest or Forest-level units 503 Ranger District or District-level units The Forest Service administers 149 Wild and Scenic Rivers in 23 States and 456 National Wilderness Areas in 39 States. The Forest Service also administers several other types of nationally designated
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 National Wilderness Awards Announcement
    Forest Washington 1400 Independence Avenue, SW Service Office Washington, DC 20250 File Code: 2320 Date: July 1, 2011 Route To: Subject: 2011 National Wilderness Awards Announcement To: Regional Foresters, Station Directors, Area Director, IITF Director, Deputy Chiefs I am pleased to announce the recipients of the 2011 National Wilderness Awards. These awards honor individuals and groups for excellence in wilderness stewardship. This national award encompasses education, traditional skills and minimum tools leadership, and overall wilderness stewardship. The 2011 National Wilderness Award recipients are: Aldo Leopold Award for Overall Wilderness Stewardship Program Stanislaus Wilderness Volunteers—The Stanislaus Wilderness Volunteer organization is being recognized for sponsoring two wilderness ranger interns to assist the Stanislaus wilderness crew with invasive species management in wilderness areas. The Stanislaus Volunteer organization started their own wilderness intern program, and increased the group’s capacity to complete wilderness stewardship projects by 20 percent. The Stanislaus Volunteer organization is also a leader in wilderness and Leave No Trace education. The organization secured a grant from the Tides Foundation California Wilderness Grassroots Fund to co-sponsor a Leave No Trace Master Educator course in partnership with the Stanislaus National Forest and Yosemite National Park. Bob Marshall Award for Individual Champion of Wilderness Stewardship Deb Gale, Bitterroot National Forest—Deb is active in regional and national wilderness issues. She served as Co-chair for the Chief’s Wilderness Advisory Group from 2005-2008, and has taken a leadership role on the Anaconda-Pintler, Frank Church, and Selway-Bitterroot Wilderness Management Teams. These three wilderness teams have complex coordination needs because they are managed by multiple National Forests, multiple Forest Service Regions, and multiple States.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Natural Areas on National Forest System Lands in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, and Western Wyoming: a Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and Educators
    USDA United States Department of Agriculture Research Natural Areas on Forest Service National Forest System Lands Rocky Mountain Research Station in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, General Technical Report RMRS-CTR-69 Utah, and Western Wyoming: February 2001 A Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and E'ducators Angela G. Evenden Melinda Moeur J. Stephen Shelly Shannon F. Kimball Charles A. Wellner Abstract Evenden, Angela G.; Moeur, Melinda; Shelly, J. Stephen; Kimball, Shannon F.; Wellner, Charles A. 2001. Research Natural Areas on National Forest System Lands in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, and Western Wyoming: A Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and Educators. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-69. Ogden, UT: U.S. Departmentof Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 84 p. This guidebook is intended to familiarize land resource managers, scientists, educators, and others with Research Natural Areas (RNAs) managed by the USDA Forest Service in the Northern Rocky Mountains and lntermountain West. This guidebook facilitates broader recognitionand use of these valuable natural areas by describing the RNA network, past and current research and monitoring, management, and how to use RNAs. About The Authors Angela G. Evenden is biological inventory and monitoring project leader with the National Park Service -NorthernColorado Plateau Network in Moab, UT. She was formerly the Natural Areas Program Manager for the Rocky Mountain Research Station, Northern Region and lntermountain Region of the USDA Forest Service. Melinda Moeur is Research Forester with the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain ResearchStation in Moscow, ID, and one of four Research Natural Areas Coordinators from the Rocky Mountain Research Station. J. Stephen Shelly is Regional Botanist and Research Natural Areas Coordinator with the USDA Forest Service, Northern Region Headquarters Office in Missoula, MT.
    [Show full text]
  • Interior Columbia Basin Mollusk Species of Special Concern
    Deixis l-4 consultants INTERIOR COLUMl3lA BASIN MOLLUSK SPECIES OF SPECIAL CONCERN cryptomasfix magnidenfata (Pilsbly, 1940), x7.5 FINAL REPORT Contract #43-OEOO-4-9112 Prepared for: INTERIOR COLUMBIA BASIN ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT PROJECT 112 East Poplar Street Walla Walla, WA 99362 TERRENCE J. FREST EDWARD J. JOHANNES January 15, 1995 2517 NE 65th Street Seattle, WA 98115-7125 ‘(206) 527-6764 INTERIOR COLUMBIA BASIN MOLLUSK SPECIES OF SPECIAL CONCERN Terrence J. Frest & Edward J. Johannes Deixis Consultants 2517 NE 65th Street Seattle, WA 98115-7125 (206) 527-6764 January 15,1995 i Each shell, each crawling insect holds a rank important in the plan of Him who framed This scale of beings; holds a rank, which lost Would break the chain and leave behind a gap Which Nature’s self wcuid rue. -Stiiiingfieet, quoted in Tryon (1882) The fast word in ignorance is the man who says of an animal or plant: “what good is it?” If the land mechanism as a whole is good, then every part is good, whether we understand it or not. if the biota in the course of eons has built something we like but do not understand, then who but a fool would discard seemingly useless parts? To keep every cog and wheel is the first rule of intelligent tinkering. -Aido Leopold Put the information you have uncovered to beneficial use. -Anonymous: fortune cookie from China Garden restaurant, Seattle, WA in this “business first” society that we have developed (and that we maintain), the promulgators and pragmatic apologists who favor a “single crop” approach, to enable a continuous “harvest” from the natural system that we have decimated in the name of profits, jobs, etc., are fairfy easy to find.
    [Show full text]
  • Ashley National Forest Recreation Fee Highlights, 2016
    United States Department of Agriculture Sawtooth National Forest Credit to Tony Baril 2015 Share the Experience Ashley National Forest Recreation Fee Program Accomplishment Highlights 2016 Repairing the Pump Improving Shoulder Seasons Iron Springs Group Campground is a popular site for family Unloading reunions, Boy Scout vault voilet groups, and youth at Lucerne group outings. One boat ramp. of the water pumps for the water system failed forty feet below ground. Seasonal recreation employees The Lucerne boat ramp is one of the busiest areas used scaffolding and on the Flaming Gorge National Recreation Area Repairing the Iron Springs equipment to remove Campground water system and is used throughout the year. The Forest shuts forty feet of the pump down the water system during winter to prevent assembly to replace the broken valve and return frozen and broken pipes, but leaves the boat ramp potable water to the campground. Campground open. Through leveraging grant funding from Utah recreation fee revenue covered the approximately Division of Wildlife Resources of $17,000 using $3,500 in labor and supplies. $5,000 of recreation fee revenue, the Forest purchased and installed a vault toilet at Lucerne for shoulder season and winter use. Recreation Fee Dollars Recreation fee dollars are an investment The Tale of a Tall Tank in outdoor recreation. They support and enhance: The Buckboard water system is a full treatment system that • Public safety supplies potable water to the campground, boat ramp, marina, • Recreation site maintenance and and RV park. The water storage tank was in need of repairs and improvements maintenance such as new lower access hatch, an overflow • Educational experiences pipe, and repainting the structure to prevent corrosion.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 07/01/2008 to 09/30/2008 Clearwater National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 07/01/2008 to 09/30/2008 Clearwater National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring Nationwide National Forest System Land - Regulations, Directives, Completed Actual: 04/09/2008 04/2008 Gina Owens Management Planning - Orders 202-205-1187 Proposed Rule [email protected] EIS Description: The Agency proposes to publish a rule at 36 CFR part 219 to finish rulemaking on the land management planning rule issued on January 5, 2005 (2005 rule). The 2005 rule guides development, revision, and amendment of land management plans. Web Link: http://www.fs.fed.us/emc/nfma/2008_planning_rule.html Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - All units of the National Forest System. Agency-wide. Projects Occurring in more than one Region (excluding Nationwide) 07/01/2008 Page 1 of 10 Clearwater National Forest Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring in more than one Region (excluding Nationwide) Geothermal Leasing - Regulations, Directives, In Progress: Expected:12/2008 02/2009 Peter Gaulke Programmatic Environmental Orders DEIS NOA in Federal Register 703-605-4796 Impact Statement 06/13/2008 [email protected] EIS Est. FEIS NOA in Federal *NEW LISTING* Register 11/2008 Description: The Bureau of Land Management and Forest Service are preparing a joint Programmatic Environmental Impac Statement to analyze the leasing of BLM and USFS administered lands with moderate to high potential for geothermal resources in 11 western states.
    [Show full text]
  • USDA Forest Service Guidelines for Consultants for Identifying, Recording, & Evaluating Archaeological Resources in UTAH April 20, 2020
    USDA Forest Service Guidelines for Consultants for Identifying, Recording, & Evaluating Archaeological Resources in UTAH April 20, 2020 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION & CONTACTS ....................................................................................................................... 2 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................................................ 4 Policy ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Professional Qualifications ....................................................................................................................... 4 Bids ............................................................................................................................................................ 4 Permits for Archaeological Investigations ................................................................................................ 5 Project Numbers ....................................................................................................................................... 5 Site Numbers ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Discoveries ................................................................................................................................................ 5 Confidentiality ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Studies on the Genus Carex on the Idaho Panhandle National Forests
    STUDIES IN THE GENUS CAREX ON THE IDAHO PANHANDLE NATIONAL FORESTS by Steven L. Caicco Natural Heritage Section Nongame Wildlife/Endangered Species Program Bureau of Wildlife December 1988 Idaho Department of Fish and Game 600 South Walnut Street, P.O. Box 25 Boise, Idaho 83707 Jerry M. Conley, Director Cooperative Challenge Grant Project Idaho Panhandle National Forests Idaho Department of Fish and Game Contract No. 53-0281-7-163 ABSTRACT Eleven of thirteen species of the genus Carex (sedges) which have been designated as Sensitive Species within Region 1 of the U.S. Forest Service are known to occur in Idaho. In this study, the status of these thirteen species, plus one other species of sedge, on the Idaho Panhandle National Forests was investigated through herbaria searches and field surveys. In individual reports, the taxonomy, description, range, habitat, collection record, and conservation status of nine of the fourteen species are discussed. Each species discussion ends with recommendations for land managers and field personnel. The other five species of sedge are more briefly discussed. TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT...................................................... i TABLE OF CONTENTS............................................. ii LIST OF APPENDICES............................................ ii INTRODUCTION.................................................. 1 INDIVIDUAL SPECIES REPORTS Carex aenea Fern. ............................................ 2 Carex buxbaumii Wahl. ........................................ 4 Carex californica
    [Show full text]
  • Uinta NF Ranger Stations
    United States Department of Agriculture The Enchantment of Forest Service Intermountain Region Ranger Life in the Hills UINTA NATIONAL FOREST JULY 2016 Administrative Facilities of the Uinta National Forest, 1905-1965 Historic Context & Evaluations Forest Service Report No. UWC-16-1328 Cover: Lake Creek Ranger Station, 1949 Pleasant Grove Ranger Station, 1965 “I had a carpenter hired and boarded up the house around the foundation. It was from 6 in. to 2 feet off the ground and skunks and animals frequently got under the house, which detracted some of the enchantment of Ranger Life in the Hills.” Aaron Parley Christiansen, April 26, 1919 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior Geological
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Mineral resource potential of national forest RARE II and wilderness areas in Montana Compiled by Christopher E. Williams 1 and Robert C. Pearson2 Open-File Report 84-637 1984 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. 1 Present address 2 Denver, Colorado U.S. Environmental Protection Agency/NEIC Denver, Colorado CONTENTS (See also indices listings, p. 128-131) Page Introduction*........................................................... 1 Beaverhead National Forest............................................... 2 North Big Hole (1-001).............................................. 2 West Pioneer (1-006)................................................ 2 Eastern Pioneer Mountains (1-008)................................... 3 Middle Mountain-Tobacco Root (1-013)................................ 4 Potosi (1-014)...................................................... 5 Madison/Jack Creek Basin (1-549).................................... 5 West Big Hole (1-943)............................................... 6 Italian Peak (1-945)................................................ 7 Garfield Mountain (1-961)........................................... 7 Mt. Jefferson (1-962)............................................... 8 Bitterroot National Forest.............................................. 9 Stony Mountain (LI-BAD)............................................. 9 Allan Mountain (Ll-YAG)............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 07/01/2021 to 09/30/2021 Ashley National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 07/01/2021 to 09/30/2021 Ashley National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring Nationwide Locatable Mining Rule - 36 CFR - Regulations, Directives, On Hold N/A N/A Sarah Shoemaker 228, subpart A. Orders 907-586-7886 EIS [email protected] d.us *UPDATED* Description: The U.S. Department of Agriculture proposes revisions to its regulations at 36 CFR 228, Subpart A governing locatable minerals operations on National Forest System lands.A draft EIS & proposed rule should be available for review/comment in late 2020 Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=57214 Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - Not Applicable. These regulations apply to all NFS lands open to mineral entry under the US mining laws. More Information is available at: https://www.fs.usda.gov/science-technology/geology/minerals/locatable-minerals/current-revisions. Projects Occurring in more than one Region (excluding Nationwide) 07/01/2021 07:16 pm MT Page 1 of 10 Ashley National Forest Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring in more than one Region (excluding Nationwide) Amendments to Land - Land management planning In Progress: Expected:12/2020 01/2021 John Shivik Management Plans Regarding - Wildlife, Fish, Rare plants Objection Period Legal Notice 801-625-5667 Sage-grouse Conservation 08/02/2019 [email protected] EIS Description: The Forest Service is considering amending its land management plans to address new and evolving issues arising since implementing sage-grouse plans in 2015.
    [Show full text]